What is
The Social Sex: A History of Female Friendship about?
The Social Sex traces the evolution of female friendship from ancient times to modern pop culture, challenging historical dismissals of women’s bonds. Marilyn Yalom and Theresa Donovan Brown analyze literary salons, religious communities, and feminist movements to show how women redefined friendship as a social force. The book blends historical records, letters, and cultural analysis, though critics note its rushed modern-era coverage.
Who should read
The Social Sex?
This book suits readers interested in feminist history, sociology, or cultural studies. Undergraduates benefit from its curated primary sources, while general audiences gain insights into friendship’s role in women’s empowerment. Fans of Yalom’s earlier works like A History of the Wife or How the French Invented Love will appreciate her signature blend of scholarship and accessibility.
Is
The Social Sex worth reading?
Yes, for its rich historical narratives about figures like Hildegard von Bingen and Jane Addams. While the modern analysis feels superficial, the first two-thirds offer compelling evidence of friendship’s cultural impact. Critics praise its archival depth but caution against oversimplified conclusions about contemporary dynamics.
What historical examples of female friendship does the book highlight?
Key examples include:
- Medieval mystics: Hildegard von Bingen and Richardis von Stade’s spiritual partnership.
- 17th-century salons: Madame de Sévigné’s intellectual circles in France.
- 19th-century reformers: Jane Addams and Ellen Starr’s Hull House collaboration.
These cases demonstrate friendships that challenged societal norms.
How does
The Social Sex address LGBTQ+ relationships?
The book examines “romantic friendships” and “Boston marriages,” arguing pre-20th-century societies lacked labels for same-sex love. Yalom proposes a “continuum” of emotional/physical intimacy, using letters to show how women navigated boundaries in repressive eras.
What critiques exist about
The Social Sex?
Critics highlight:
- Uneven pacing: Deep historical analysis contrasts with a shallow modern section.
- Outdated feminism: Some passages downplay modern gender struggles.
- Corporate bias: Overemphasis on white-collar professionals in contemporary examples.
How does
The Social Sex use primary sources?
Yalom leverages letters, diaries, and religious texts to reconstruct friendships. For example, Abigail Adams’ correspondence with Mercy Otis Warren reveals Revolutionary War-era camaraderie. The 20th-century analysis relies more on pop culture (Sex and the City) than archival material.
What key quote summarizes the book’s thesis?
“True friendship is not so different from true love.” This line captures Yalom’s argument that women’s bonds have historically rivaled romantic relationships in emotional depth, despite cultural erasure.
How does
The Social Sex compare to Marilyn Yalom’s other books?
Unlike A History of the Breast’s biological focus or Birth of the Chess Queen’s symbolic analysis, this work emphasizes social dynamics. It shares How the French Invented Love’s interdisciplinary approach but centers women’s agency over cultural narratives.
Why is
The Social Sex relevant in 2025?
As debates about online friendships and workplace equality persist, the book’s historical context helps reframe modern issues. Its analysis of women’s networks in male-dominated fields remains pertinent to DEI initiatives.
What frameworks does the book use to analyze friendship?
Three key lenses:
- Community-building: Convents, salons, and labor unions as friendship incubators.
- Emotional labor: How women’s letter-writing sustained long-distance bonds.
- Cultural resistance: Friendships as acts of defiance in restrictive societies.
How does
The Social Sex address race and class?
Limitedly – most examples feature Western, educated women. The authors acknowledge this gap but don’t fully explore cross-cultural or working-class dynamics beyond brief mentions of Lowell factory girls.