What is *Winning Now, Winning Later* by David M. Cote about?

*Winning Now, Winning Later* provides a framework for balancing short-term business performance with long-term strategic investments. David M. Cote, former Honeywell CEO, shares proven strategies to avoid costly short-term practices while fostering sustainable growth, drawing from his experience growing Honeywell’s market cap from $20B to $120B. The book offers tools for leaders to navigate recessions, leadership transitions, and investor pressures.

Who should read *Winning Now, Winning Later*?

This book is essential for CEOs, executives, and managers seeking to align quarterly results with multi-year goals. Entrepreneurs and mid-career professionals will gain actionable insights on decision-making, resource allocation, and cultivating organizational resilience. It’s particularly valuable for leaders in tech, manufacturing, or data-driven industries facing shareholder demands.

What are David M. Cote’s credentials for writing this book?

Cote led Honeywell’s transformation into a $120B company during his 16-year CEO tenure. He served on the Simpson-Bowles Commission under President Obama and received *Barron’s* “World’s Best CEO” recognition five times. His hands-on experience balancing operational efficiency with R&D investments grounds the book’s principles in real-world success.

What are the Three Principles of Short- and Long-Term Performance?

Cote’s core framework emphasizes: - **Intellectual rigor**: Challenging binary thinking to pursue conflicting goals simultaneously - **Strategic transparency**: Honest conversations about business challenges and opportunities - **Process discipline**: Systematically aligning daily operations with long-term vision. These principles enabled Honeywell to outperform the S&P 500 by 2.5x.

How does *Winning Now, Winning Later* suggest balancing immediate and future goals?

The book advises: - Identifying short-term practices that undermine long-term value (e.g., excessive cost-cutting) - Strategic R&D investments with clear ROI timelines - Maintaining growth initiatives during recessions - Using data-driven metrics to track dual objectives. Cote demonstrates how Honeywell increased automation investments while delivering consistent quarterly growth.

What makes *Winning Now, Winning Later* different from other leadership books?

Unlike theoretical frameworks, Cote’s approach was battle-tested at Honeywell during the 2008 crisis and multiple leadership transitions. The book combines operational playbooks with psychological strategies to counter investor myopia. It uniquely addresses sustaining dual focuses across economic cycles, supported by 25+ case studies.

What key quote summarizes the book’s philosophy?

“The same discipline that delivers short-term results becomes the foundation for long-term success”. This reflects Cote’s belief that operational excellence and strategic vision are mutually reinforcing, not opposing forces. Another pivotal analogy compares leadership to engineering the Panama Canal – requiring simultaneous precision and long-range planning.

Does *Winning Now, Winning Later* address common leadership mistakes?

Yes, it identifies pitfalls like: - Over-indexing on quarterly earnings at the expense of R&D - Failing to communicate long-term visions to stakeholders - Neglecting cultural foundations during rapid scaling. Cote shares how he avoided these at Honeywell by tying 30% of executive bonuses to 5-year metrics.

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법

연쇄 창업 CEO가 전하는 리더십의 비밀

데이비드 코트

4.04(542 Reviews)

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법 개요

전 Honeywell CEO인 데이비드 코트(David Cote)가 장기적인 성공을 구축하는 동시에 즉각적인 성과를 달성하는 방법을 공개합니다. 그의 "원 하니웰(One Honeywell)" 이니셔티브는 수백만 달러를 절감하고 기업 문화를 변화시켰습니다. 당신의 비즈니스도 이 두 가지 기간 모두에서 번창할 수 있을까요? 그 답은 당신을 놀라게 할지도 모릅니다.

전달 방식을 선택하세요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법의 같은 아이디어를 담았습니다. 나에게 맞는 목소리, 깊이, 속도를 고르고 언제든 바꿔 보세요.

1장

The Balancing Act: How to Win Now and Later

What if the greatest business dilemma was actually a false choice? In 2002, David Cote took over as CEO of Honeywell, a company in crisis with $20 billion market capitalization. By 2018, Honeywell's value had soared to $120 billion, generating 800% returns and beating the S&P 500 by 2.5 times. The secret? Rejecting the supposed trade-off between short-term results and long-term investments. Cote's philosophy-that businesses can and must deliver on both timeframes simultaneously-forms the backbone of this Wall Street Journal bestseller. Warren Buffett called it "an inspiring blueprint for smart, thoughtful business strategies," while Jim Collins praised it as "a leadership classic." Beyond financial success, Cote's approach created 2,500 401(k) millionaires among Honeywell employees, 95% of whom were below executive level. His insights offer a roadmap for any leader seeking to build sustainable success without sacrificing immediate performance.

2장

Intellectual Rigor: The Foundation of Dual-Horizon Leadership

The fundamental challenge of achieving both short and long-term success isn't about processes or strategies-it's about adopting a more intellectual mindset. When I arrived at Honeywell, I found executives avoiding tough questions and relying on accounting tricks rather than finding innovative ways to support both immediate results and future investments. This intellectual laziness was epidemic. Meetings were filled with meaningless jargon and misleading analytics designed to make businesses look good rather than reveal truth. Most leaders didn't understand their businesses, customers, operations, technologies, or markets. During one customer visit I expected to discuss a new product, only to learn the customer was finalizing a lawsuit against us-something my team was completely unaware of. The solution required continuous intellectual effort-challenging ourselves and our teams to think harder about customers, markets, and processes. I called this the "Any Ninny" theory: any ninny could improve a single metric without much thought, but great leaders probe deeper to resolve tensions between competing priorities. While conventional wisdom claimed you couldn't have both high margins and high volume, or reduced inventory and excellent customer delivery, I believed intellectual discipline allows leaders to achieve seemingly conflicting goals simultaneously. To improve decision-making at Honeywell, I modeled critical inquiry myself, interrupting presentations with probing questions. I pushed leaders beyond incrementalism-the tendency to consider only short-term implications while ignoring long-term consequences. When leaders wanted to expand existing high-cost plants rather than establish presence in low-cost locations, I challenged them to think more deeply. By considering hidden costs and implications, the equation often changed dramatically. I shared an anecdote about the Panama Canal's chief engineer whose math teacher advised: "If you have five minutes to solve a problem, use the first three to figure out how you're going to do it." This resonated throughout Honeywell, with executives taking their "three minutes" before making critical decisions. Asking leaders to make more rigorous decisions required me to work harder too. I prepared key questions before meetings, informed myself about businesses and trends, and traveled to plants and customers in about a hundred countries. I read five newspapers daily plus business publications, met with diverse thought leaders, and spent time in quiet reflection. As Pascal noted, conveying thoughts clearly and concisely demonstrates true comprehension.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

3장

Strategic Planning: Balancing Today and Tomorrow

Upon becoming CEO, I discovered Honeywell trapped in destructive short-termism. Despite forecasting $2.36 EPS, our actual earnings would only reach $2.05-a shocking 20% decline. When I investigated, I found business leaders had been forced to accept unrealistic targets while finance demanded they "just get it done" regardless of consequences. To fix this, I first eliminated quick fixes that kept everyone focused on short-term results at tomorrow's expense. It took eighteen months to eliminate all aggressive accounting practices. We declined every request for transactions that would help make quarterly numbers but harm long-term interests. Some executives couldn't adapt and left the company. I was transparent with investors that our performance would lag initially as we straightened out the business, causing our stock to drop 25%. This hurt, but we believed our performance would track upward once we were running strategically. Despite having a formal strategic planning process, Honeywell's presentations were essentially worthless. Leaders had no real understanding of how to run their businesses over five years, set unrealistic targets to please bosses, and buried their lack of substance in hundreds of pages of charts. Starting in 2003, I required concise three-to-four-page executive summaries highlighting the basic plan, scrutinized every word, and challenged vague claims about "competitive strengths." To make planning more substantive and regular, I established growth and operations days with follow-up consultations every six weeks. These meetings required leaders to prepare concise ten-page presentations with current financial and operational data, forcing them to gather and analyze information regularly rather than treating strategy as an annual event. Rather than implementing dramatic cost-cutting through mass layoffs and closures, I advocate for "perpetual restructuring"-a gradual approach where you keep fixed costs steady while growing sales year over year. By operating more efficiently and doing slightly more each year with the same resources, you can deliver part of the added profits to investors while setting aside portions for R&D, geographic expansion, and strategic portfolio management. This measured approach allowed us to boost R&D investment from 3.3% to 5.5% of sales while improving operating margins from 8% to 16% and almost doubling sales. The magic lies in creating organizational flexibility-Darwin's key insight wasn't just "survival of the fittest" but survival of the most flexible.

4장

Tackling Legacy Issues: Cleaning House for Future Growth

In 2003, a fatal accident at Honeywell's Baton Rouge chemical plant revealed deeper systemic problems when plant leaders dismissed it as "unlucky" rather than addressing fundamental safety failures. This incident exposed just one of many serious threats facing the company, including billions in asbestos liabilities, environmental cleanup costs, an underfunded pension, and aggressive accounting practices. These legacy issues stemmed from short-term thinking by previous leaders who prioritized quarterly results over long-term health. When I became CEO, I committed to fixing these issues immediately, even at the expense of short-term earnings. We set aside $1.5 billion to settle asbestos lawsuits, increased environmental remediation funding from $80 million to $250 million annually, allocated nearly $900 million to properly fund our pension (with another $4.5 billion during the Great Recession), invested in company-wide safety training, and spent two years strengthening our financial reporting. Our proactive approach built tremendous goodwill. When arsenic was discovered in a Baltimore playground from one of our old industrial sites, we immediately funded the cleanup without waiting for lawsuits. This earned appreciation from a U.S. Senator who personally thanked me. Though investors were initially skeptical about our liability reserves, they eventually recognized our wisdom as costs decreased as a percentage of profits over time. Beyond resolving past issues, we worked to prevent new problems. We audited our facilities in developing countries, discovering and fixing subpar conditions in cafeterias, bathrooms, and dormitories. We incorporated Health, Safety, and Environmental concerns directly into our Honeywell Operating System, making safety discussions mandatory at every meeting. We empowered employees to identify problems and implement solutions through kaizen improvement events. Leaders often view safety and environmental improvements as inherently costly, but process improvements can actually reduce costs while preventing harm. Over fifteen years, we invested $3.5 billion to resolve our major environmental liabilities. Environmental incidents declined 93% between 2005-2018, energy efficiency improved 70% since 2004, and our safety record is now 80% better than industry average. The Onondaga Lake cleanup near Syracuse represents one of our proudest accomplishments. Once called "America's most polluted lake" due to industrial contamination including mercury from Allied Chemical (now Honeywell), we agreed to a $451 million cleanup plan in 2006. By 2015, swimming was allowed again, with fish and birds returning and contaminant levels plummeting. We contained business risk while doing the right thing environmentally, even though the short-term costs were significant.

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

5장

Process Excellence: The Hidden Hero of Sustainable Success

Process improvement is the invisible hero of sustainable business success. At Honeywell, we transformed operations through the Honeywell Operating System (HOS), which standardized processes across all facilities while engaging frontline workers in continuous improvement. Unlike typical initiatives that fade away, HOS permanently improved quality, safety, and efficiency while reducing costs and environmental impact. The genesis of HOS came during one of my reflective "X days," when I realized half our 115,000 employees worked in manufacturing. Most factory workers want to contribute intellectually but lack formal channels to improve processes. The challenge was consistency-our plants operated with no standardized approach, with managers constantly implementing their latest weekend reading inspiration, creating endless churn without sustainable progress. After visiting Toyota's training facility, our leaders returned eager to implement changes everywhere immediately. I cautioned restraint. Unlike Toyota, which could implement its system in new plants with carefully selected employees, we had factories that were decades old with entrenched workforces. Rushing implementation would cause workers to dismiss it as another "program of the month." We took a phased approach, piloting in ten plants for six months, tracking improvements in safety, quality, delivery, cost, and inventory. After analyzing what worked, we revised our approach, adding critical elements like ensuring plant managers truly bought in. With our methodology refined, we rolled out HOS to 30 plants, investing heavily in support and making leadership changes where needed. Over a decade of relentless implementation, we saw dramatic results. Typical plants generated hundreds of process improvement ideas, reducing costs 15-20% while similarly improving safety, inventory, delivery, and quality. Factories could do more with fewer people and 20-30% less floor space. HOS also boosted worker engagement, even in unionized facilities that typically resisted corporate initiatives. Process improvement isn't just for production lines-it works for back-office functions too. We launched "Functional Transformation," requiring five-year strategic plans from functional leaders with business leaders participating in reviews. Over ten years, as Honeywell doubled in size, functional budgets declined by about $1 billion (44% as percent of sales) while service quality improved. Revolutionary change sounds appealing but carries enormous risks. If market dimensions change 4% annually and you don't evolve with them, after a decade you'll face an enormous gap requiring disruptive revolution just to catch up. At Honeywell, we flourished by challenging ourselves through HOS, process change, and cultural transformation to constantly improve and get better at improving. Enhancing processes incrementally and sustainably became fundamental to our culture, informing how we ran everything.

6장

Building a High-Performance Culture: One Honeywell

When I took over as Honeywell CEO, I discovered a fractured culture where legacy Honeywell ("red") and AlliedSignal ("blue") employees maintained separate, dysfunctional identities, while acquired Pittway employees operated independently. This cultural chaos was destroying the business, making talent retention impossible and preventing strategic execution. I prioritized building a unified culture as essential to achieving both short-term results and long-term growth. In my second month as CEO, I defined five key strategic initiatives (growth, productivity, cash, people, and operational enablers) and developed twelve core behaviors to shape Honeywell's culture. These behaviors weren't revolutionary-including customer focus, getting results, fostering teamwork, and self-awareness-but we committed to implementing them relentlessly. We branded this unified approach as "One Honeywell," focusing everyone on serving customers rather than maintaining subcultures. I devoted about a quarter of my time to culture-building, constantly talking about it and attending multiple training sessions monthly. The annual senior leadership meeting was transformed from a one-day cafeteria event to a prestigious three-day gathering with carefully selected leaders from diverse backgrounds. Beyond formal events, leaders demonstrated the Twelve Behaviors through their actions, recognizing that acculturation happens when people see principles in practice, not just through rational information transfer. In 2014, Honeywell nearly sold its Friction Materials business at a $75 million loss. Because I had internalized the "learning mindset" behavior emphasizing self-awareness, I called an additional review meeting despite initial approval and team resistance. During this late-night conference call from China, I discovered previously unexplained financial nuances that made the deal worse than initially presented. By backing out, Honeywell later sold the same business for $25 million less of a loss. While the Twelve Behaviors formed the core of our culture, I pushed additional principles that supported high performance. Timeliness wasn't explicitly listed but became non-negotiable-meetings started and ended on schedule, and deadlines were strictly kept. Integrity was another principle I emphasized relentlessly, building trust with all stakeholders through accurate metrics, transparent accounting, environmental responsibility, and strict legal compliance. Cultural change requires relentless repetition and personal commitment from leadership. We never changed the Five Initiatives or Twelve Behaviors throughout my tenure, providing crucial consistency. As Mark James noted, I was like a "big annoying bear" who kept showing up until people changed their behavior and eventually embraced the culture. Town halls provided opportunities for straight talk with employees, and we implemented accountability mechanisms that tied compensation and promotions to cultural adherence. The cultural transformation directly drove our performance, as exemplified by Darius Adamczyk, who initially joined reluctantly through an acquisition but stayed because he recognized Honeywell's genuine performance-based meritocracy. He eventually became our successful chairman and CEO. Though difficult to quantify, our culture undeniably enabled our turnaround and sustained performance by attracting and retaining top talent while making Honeywell a great workplace for 130,000 employees.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

7장

Leadership Excellence: Quality Over Quantity

When Honeywell's Aerospace division president and CFO unexpectedly resigned simultaneously, we announced their replacements within 48 hours-something possible only because we took succession planning seriously. For sustained performance, having the right executive leadership is crucial-talented senior leaders committed to company strategies and capable of executing them. The right number matters too: maintaining a relatively small, stable leadership corps that punches above its weight allows organizations to remain nimble while growing. Improving leadership quality isn't simply about firing weak performers and replacing them with better people. During my early years at Honeywell, we transitioned out several top leaders but avoided radical house-cleaning, keeping as many existing leaders as possible to maintain stability. The key improvements came through tightening our people processes, particularly the management resource reviews (MRRs). We increased their rigor and frequency, requiring leaders to either identify viable successors for positions or acknowledge gaps. We transformed our previously weak performance review system by requiring managers to write appraisals themselves rather than having employees self-evaluate. Despite complaints about time constraints, I emphasized that spending twenty hours annually on ensuring you have the best people performing at high levels was an essential investment for any leader. By timing appraisals to coincide with salary decisions, we ensured managers took them seriously. For years, Honeywell had been too soft on underperformers. We made it clear that nobody was indispensable, and I personally removed several key leaders who delivered numbers but undermined our cultural values. We shifted responsibility for improvement onto the underperformers themselves rather than burdening their managers with excessive coaching. While meaningful work is crucial for motivating talented people, money absolutely matters too. We prioritized fairness in compensation, evaluating leaders on their total performance rather than just budget goals. To encourage long-term thinking, we structured compensation with average short-term pay (50th-70th percentile) but exceptional long-term compensation (90th percentile) through stock options and restricted stock. At Honeywell, we invested extraordinary time ensuring we hired top-notch people. For our 200 most senior leadership positions, our HR leader and I personally interviewed final candidates. These interviews served multiple purposes: quality control, signaling the job's importance to candidates, and communicating expectations. We emphasized internal hiring not just for continuity but because we believed the best talent was often already within our organization, overlooked due to credentials or past positions. Like Tom Brady, who sat on the bench before becoming football's greatest quarterback, many potential stars are already in your organization but haven't been given the opportunity to shine. Organizations often suffer from "leadership bloat"-too many leaders creating excessive bureaucracy. At Honeywell, we challenged this by giving every functional and business leader targets for incrementally reducing leadership positions. When any of our top 740 leaders departed, we questioned whether the position was truly necessary or if responsibilities could be redistributed. This approach reduced bureaucratic drag and lowered costs, allowing us to compensate the remaining leaders more generously.

8장

Driving Growth: Seeds for Tomorrow's Harvest

Growth requires strategic reinvestment of value created through process improvements and efficiency gains. While returning some surplus to shareholders and addressing legacy issues, we directed significant resources toward growth initiatives spanning customer experience, R&D, and globalization. I learned the importance of customer service at age twelve working in my father's garage. He taught me that washing windshields and keeping bathrooms clean were crucial differentiators-customers could buy gas anywhere, but these touches gave them reason to choose us. At Honeywell, I found we talked about "delighting" customers but failed to deliver. Through improved metrics, auditing, and making customer service central to our culture initiatives, we shifted this mindset and saw quick improvements in both customer satisfaction and revenue. When I arrived, Honeywell was severely underinvesting in new products. We tripled R&D spending over fifteen years while dramatically improving efficiency. First, we expanded our high-quality, low-cost R&D centers in India, China, and the Czech Republic from 500 to 10,000 employees. We transformed R&D budgeting from a system where business units claimed their "share" regardless of impact to a centralized approach that analyzed potential projects and directed funds to those with the greatest business potential. We improved R&D by focusing on delivering better user experiences. We created the "Honeywell User Experience" (HUE) initiative to become the "Apple of the industrial sector," hiring experts, creating design rooms, and establishing awards. The Experion Orion Console exemplifies our success-a revolutionary control panel for industrial facilities that's simpler and more intuitive, helping plants achieve greater safety and efficiency. When I joined Honeywell, 75% of global GDP was outside the US, but only 40% of our sales came from there-a 35-point gap representing opportunity. Rather than attacking many regions simultaneously, we focused on China and India first. Under Shane Tedjarati's leadership, we transformed our approach to become "insiders" capable of competing with the best local companies. We upgraded our leadership talent with local Chinese leaders rather than expats, developed local sourcing, gave teams more autonomy, and located R&D facilities in-country to design products with features local consumers wanted. Companies can't pursue all growth avenues with the same intensity. You must prioritize based on your organization's strengths and weaknesses. This requires patience-you must till the soil, plant seeds, and nurture growth over several seasons without shortcuts. Our consistent investment in growth initiatives delivered $11.5 billion in organic growth from 2002-2017, complementing the $6.5 billion from acquisitions and divestitures. If you want to grow, you must plant seeds.

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

9장

Navigating Downturns: Protecting the Future During Crisis

In 2018, I discovered a nine-page letter I'd written to future Honeywell CEOs in 2011, capturing our successful navigation of the Great Recession. Two key strategies emerge for managing downturns while maintaining long-term growth: First, prepare proactively before recessions hit hard by cutting costs while preserving growth initiatives. Second, even during cost-cutting, position for the inevitable recovery. We took preventative action in July 2008 by selling our Consumable Solutions business to B/E Aerospace for $1.05 billion, generating a $623 million pre-tax gain. Rather than returning this money to shareholders, we invested $200 million in restructuring-consolidating plants and laying off about 3,000 employees-saving us $50 million in 2009. I also instructed leaders to base their 2009 plans on significant sales declines, despite resistance from our Aerospace division. When 2009 sales declined more than anticipated, we faced tough decisions about where to cut costs. Our guiding principle was avoiding actions that would compromise long-term performance. We maintained necessary staffing and materials to deliver products, continued funding all process improvement initiatives, and sustained development of promised products and services. Our fundamental goal was ensuring customers felt no negative impact, recognizing that without strong customer performance, both investors and employees would suffer. During the Great Recession, we prioritized maintaining our talent base rather than resorting to layoffs. Research shows layoffs harm innovation, morale, performance, corporate reputation, and customer retention. Instead, we implemented furloughs-having employees stay home without pay for periods-which preserved jobs and our knowledge base while costing less than layoffs. Though initially welcomed, multiple rounds of furloughs damaged morale, but I remained firm on the furlough strategy, knowing it preserved our industrial base for the eventual recovery. During recessions, supply chain disruptions compound dramatically-a 7% reduction in end-market demand can cascade into 25% order reductions from customers, 40% reductions in our orders to suppliers, and 50-60% cuts further down the chain. I anticipated this problem and directed our business leaders, especially in short-cycle businesses, to work with suppliers during the recession's depths to secure priority access when demand returned. By negotiating better terms, prices, and priority status with suppliers while competitors weren't thinking ahead, our businesses outpaced rivals during the recovery. Our combined savings allowed us to outperform competitors without sacrificing growth programs. Our earnings per share rose 78 percent from 2006-2012, more than doubling our competitors' average increase. Our performance continued to outpace the S&P 500 for the next decade as our investments in R&D, HOS, culture, and globalization bore fruit. Recessions severely test a leader's commitment to balancing short and long-term strategies. However, the groundwork laid before the crisis pays dividends during tough times. Our cultural investments meant leaders voluntarily sacrificed bonuses and employees endured furloughs without losing faith. Our stronger leadership corps communicated effectively, maintaining morale. By strengthening your organization from the inside out and positioning for long-term growth while maintaining decent quarterly results, you'll weather even the fiercest economic storms-just as Honeywell did.

10장

Leadership Transition: Ensuring Continuity of Excellence

No matter how diligently you've built for the future while delivering today's profits, your accomplishments remain fragile during leadership transitions. Despite analysts' concerns about Honeywell's CEO succession, we implemented an unusually intensive, decade-long process to select and transition to our new CEO, Darius Adamczyk. This methodical approach prevented the confusion and infighting that typically damage companies during transitions. Beginning in 2007, approximately ten years before my planned retirement, we identified potential internal successors who could serve for at least a decade. We focused on executives around forty years old who were top performers with CEO potential. Over several years, we gave these candidates progressively larger responsibilities to test their capabilities. Darius joined our candidate pool after the Metrologic acquisition in 2008, having doubled our Scanning and Mobility business to $1.5 billion and successfully transformed our $3.5 billion Process Solutions business. Finding conventional CEO selection strategies inadequate, I developed Honeywell's own process focusing on six key criteria: an intense desire to win, intelligence, independent thinking, courage, curiosity, and the ability to motivate and build culture. By 2014, we had identified our finalists including Darius. Without formal announcements, we gave each finalist a significant "leap" job to observe their decision-making abilities. In late 2015, we challenged finalists to prepare strategic plans for Honeywell and present them to the board. Darius stood out by showing independent thinking, courage, and drive. We implemented a two-year transition process rather than a quick handover. During the first year, Darius served as COO while I remained responsible for performance. In the second year, Darius became CEO while I remained as executive chairman, providing guidance only when requested. I moved to a smaller office and publicly affirmed his authority, making it clear Honeywell needed to evolve under his leadership. Our arrangement worked because we both approached it with the right mindset. I was ready to transfer decision-making and work as a partner rather than boss. I openly acknowledged Honeywell wasn't perfect and needed to continue evolving under his leadership. Darius was eager to learn while asserting his authority, never feeling threatened by asking for help. We both put our egos aside for the company's sake, which built trust and allowed the organization to experience the transition as a natural process rather than an abrupt shift. I made sure to address emerging problems before stepping down so Darius wouldn't face unpleasant surprises. During my final year, I accepted some financial hits by missing consensus by 2 cents and refinancing debt with a big upfront expense-moves that made me look worse but positioned Darius for success by lowering future interest expenses. Having experienced unexpected messes when I became CEO, I was determined to leave Honeywell in a "clean" state so my successor could focus immediately on growth rather than firefighting. When activist investor Third Point Management recommended spinning off our Aerospace business six weeks before my retirement, we approached it constructively rather than defensively. Thanks to Darius's portfolio analysis work, we had better ideas-spinning out parts of our Homes and Buildings Technologies and Turbocharger businesses instead. Darius's plan won over investors, sending our share price up 32% in 2017. During his first two years as CEO, Honeywell delivered a 55% total shareholder return compared to 32% for the S&P 500. Our rigorous selection process had identified the right leader, even though Darius wasn't initially on our list of contenders.

★★★★★

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법 완독을 축하합니다

100만 명 이상의 학습자가 사랑합니다

“23일째 매일 사용하고 있어요. 이제 제 일상의 한 부분이 되었습니다.”

jayallen

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법의 핵심 주제

dual-horizon leadership
short-termism mitigation
intellectual rigor
perpetual restructuring
strategic resource allocation

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법의 명언

Intellectual laziness was epidemic.
Any ninny could improve a single metric without much thought.
Leaders had no real understanding of how to run their businesses.
Eliminated quick fixes that kept everyone focused on short-term results.
Darwin's key insight wasn't just 'survival of the fittest' but survival of the most flexible.

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법의 등장인물

David M. CoteAuthor and former CEO of Honeywell
Blaise PascalPhilosopher cited regarding clear communication

저자 소개

데이비드 M. 코트(David M. Cote)는 위닝 나우, 위닝 레이터(Winning Now, Winning Later): 단기 성과를 내면서 장기 투자를 병행하는 기업의 성공 전략의 저자이며, 16년의 재임 기간 동안 허니웰 인터내셔널(Honeywell International)을 혁신적으로 변화시킨 것으로 잘 알려진 저명한 경영자이자 변혁적 CEO입니다.

펨브로크 아카데미를 졸업하고 뉴햄프셔 대학교를 나온 코트는 운영 전문성과 전략적 선견지명을 결합하였으며, 이는 그의 리더십 지침서의 핵심 주제이기도 합니다. 그의 경력은 GE의 수석 부사장에서 TRW Inc.의 CEO에 이르기까지 상징적인 역할들을 아우르며, JP모건 체이스와 뉴욕 연방준비은행의 이사회 멤버로도 활동했습니다.

코트의 통찰력은 허니웰의 시가총액을 200억 달러에서 1,200억 달러로 성장시킨 경험에서 비롯되었으며, 이를 통해 치프 이그제큐티브(Chief Executive) 매거진의 "올해의 CEO" 선정 및 호레이쇼 앨저 상(Horatio Alger Award) 수상 등의 영예를 안았습니다. 그의 후속작인 *리더가 되는 법(How to Be a Leader)*은 실용적인 리더십 프레임워크를 더욱 확장하여 다루고 있습니다.

CNBC와 C-SPAN의 빈번한 논평가로도 활동하는 코트는 미-인도 CEO 포럼의 자문역을 맡았으며 심슨-볼스 위원회(Simpson-Bowles Commission)의 공동 의장을 역임했습니다. 위닝 나우, 위닝 레이터는 즉각적인 성과와 지속적인 성장 사이의 균형을 맞추기 위한 로드맵으로서 업계 리더들과 글로벌 기업들로부터 찬사를 받아왔습니다.

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법 요약 다운로드

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법 요약을 무료 PDF 또는 EPUB으로 받으세요. 인쇄하거나 오프라인에서 언제든 읽을 수 있습니다.

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

Winning

Jack Welch & Suzy Welch

Playing to Win

A. G. Lafley, Roger L. Martin

Competing for the Future

Gary Hamel

HOW TO LEAD

David M. Rubenstein

Lessons from the Titans

Scott Davis & Carter Copeland & Rob Wertheimer

Built to Last

Jim Collins

When They Win, You Win

Russ Laraway

The Power of Little Ideas

David C. Robertson

이 책에 대한 FAQ

이 학습 계획의 일부

학습 계획

Be a CEO

5 h 54 m•4 에피소드

더 알아보기

학습 계획

The Conqueror’s Code: Strategic Leadership

In an era of constant disruption, traditional management is no longer enough to sustain growth. This plan is designed for aspiring executives and entrepreneurs who need to blend bold vision with tactical agility and robust governance to build lasting organizations.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Become a better operator

Effective operations are the backbone of any successful organization, yet many leaders struggle to bridge the gap between strategy and execution. This plan is designed for aspiring COOs and managers who want to master systems thinking and build scalable processes for high-growth environments.

5 h 13 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Architecture of the Comeback

This learning plan is essential for leaders facing professional adversity or career transitions. It provides a historical blueprint for resilience, making it ideal for executives and entrepreneurs who need to turn setbacks into strategic advantages.

1 h 12 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Power and winning

This plan is designed for ambitious professionals and leaders who need to navigate complex competitive landscapes. It provides the psychological tools and strategic framework necessary to command authority and achieve consistent victory in any field.

5 h 46 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The High-Growth Leadership Playbook

In fast-scaling environments, traditional management often leads to burnout and missed deadlines. This playbook is designed for high-growth leaders who need to shift from tactical oversight to strategic empowerment to sustain team performance. It provides the psychological and behavioral tools necessary to build a self-sustaining, high-energy culture.

2 h•4 섹션

학습 계획

The First 90 Days: From Peer to Leader

Transitioning from a teammate to a manager is one of the most challenging career shifts. This plan provides a structured roadmap for new leaders to establish authority while maintaining trust and delivering measurable results.

2 h•4 섹션

학습 계획

The High-Performance Manager's Playbook

This playbook is essential for new and mid-level managers struggling to balance execution with strategic leadership. It provides the tactical tools needed to shift from doing the work to driving results through others and protecting deep work.

2 h•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Laws of Corporate Survival

In high-stakes corporate environments, technical skill alone is rarely enough to ensure longevity. This plan is designed for ambitious professionals who need to master soft power, protective maneuvers, and assertive communication to thrive amidst organizational complexity.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

지금 바로 학습 여정을 시작하세요

10장

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법

개요승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법 개요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

The Balancing Act: How to Win Now and Later

Intellectual Rigor: The Foundation of Dual-Horizon Leadership

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Strategic Planning: Balancing Today and Tomorrow

Tackling Legacy Issues: Cleaning House for Future Growth

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Process Excellence: The Hidden Hero of Sustainable Success

Building a High-Performance Culture: One Honeywell

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Leadership Excellence: Quality Over Quantity

Driving Growth: Seeds for Tomorrow's Harvest

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Navigating Downturns: Protecting the Future During Crisis

Leadership Transition: Ensuring Continuity of Excellence

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법 완독을 축하합니다

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법의 핵심 주제

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법의 명언

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법의 등장인물

저자 소개

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법 요약 다운로드

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

이 책에 대한 FAQ

What is Winning Now, Winning Later by David M. Cote about?

Who should read Winning Now, Winning Later?

What are David M. Cote’s credentials for writing this book?

What are the Three Principles of Short- and Long-Term Performance?

이 학습 계획의 일부

Be a CEO

더 알아보기

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

The Balancing Act: How to Win Now and Later

Intellectual Rigor: The Foundation of Dual-Horizon Leadership

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Strategic Planning: Balancing Today and Tomorrow

Tackling Legacy Issues: Cleaning House for Future Growth

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Process Excellence: The Hidden Hero of Sustainable Success

Building a High-Performance Culture: One Honeywell

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Leadership Excellence: Quality Over Quantity

Driving Growth: Seeds for Tomorrow's Harvest

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Navigating Downturns: Protecting the Future During Crisis

Leadership Transition: Ensuring Continuity of Excellence

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법 완독을 축하합니다

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

이 학습 계획의 일부

Be a CEO

더 알아보기

승자의 선택 : 단기 실적과 장기 전략을 동시에 잡는 법 개요