1장
The Happiness Industry: When Wellbeing Became Big Business
When the World Economic Forum gathered in 2014, something unusual happened. The global elite weren't just discussing economic indicators-they were meditating with Matthieu Ricard, a Buddhist monk dubbed "the happiest man in the world" based on neuroscientific measurements of his brain. Delegates received wearable devices tracking their physical activity, a symbol of how happiness has become central to economic management. This shift represents a profound transformation: our emotions are now subject to objective measurement, blending psychological, economic, and medical expertise in unprecedented ways.
The happiness industry isn't just a Davos phenomenon. Governments measure "national well-being," corporations employ "chief happiness officers," and schools teach positive psychology. But should we be suspicious when global elites embrace happiness so enthusiastically? William Davies argues these technologies serve specific political and economic interests rather than genuine human flourishing. For two centuries, we've repeatedly been sold the utopia that moral and political questions can be solved through measuring human feelings-with those benefiting most having interests in social control and profit.
2장
The Philosophical Roots of Happiness Science
Jeremy Bentham experienced his "eureka" moment at eighteen when reading Joseph Priestley's statement that "the good and happiness of the members" should determine everything relating to the state. This insight launched utilitarianism-the theory that right action produces maximum happiness for the population overall.
Bentham was full of contradictions: an intellectual who disliked intellectualism, a legal theorist who thought law rested on nonsense, and a hedonist who insisted on accounting for every pleasure. His unhappy childhood under a domineering father shaped his thinking, including his thwarted love life when his father vetoed a relationship because the woman wasn't wealthy enough.
He became a fierce critic of both the legal establishment and revolutionary movements, dismissing "natural rights" as "nonsense upon stilts." Instead, he pioneered evidence-based policymaking, arguing that government should be guided purely by empirical data rather than moral principles. For Bentham, happiness was the only "real" political concern, rooted in the physiological fact that "nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure."
Bentham's psychological theory emerged partly from his own unhappy experiences and strong empathy for others' suffering. He believed the common capacity to suffer should reorient the state toward relieving pain and promoting pleasure. Unlike abstract concepts like "justice," he saw happiness as rooted in tangible physical reality.
His utilitarian project faced a critical challenge: how to measure the intensity of pleasure and pain. Without standardized measurement, his entire political philosophy would collapse into mere guesswork. He proposed two possible measures: pulse rate and money. These two paths-"money or the body, economics or physiology, payment or diagnosis"-set the stage for the entanglement of psychological research and capitalism that would define the 20th century and beyond.
3장
The Science of Measuring Inner Experience
On October 22, 1850, Gustav Fechner experienced a breakthrough in Leipzig, realizing the mind-body problem might be solvable through mathematics. Unlike Bentham's empiricism, Fechner-a theologian-physicist with an eclectic background-developed "psychophysics," proposing that mind and matter were separate entities with a stable mathematical relationship.
Fechner's innovation came from applying the newly formulated principle of conservation of energy to philosophical questions. Rather than reducing mind to matter, he suggested that energy traversed the border between mind and body while obeying mathematical laws. From 1855, he conducted experiments lifting objects of different weights to test how physical changes correlated to subjective sensations, introducing the concept of a "just noticeable difference."
This quest for "mind-reading" technology aims to bypass speech entirely, potentially creating a "silent democracy" where experts determine what's good for us without hearing our voices. What's lost is the recognition that humans have reasons for their feelings that may be as significant as the feelings themselves.
Modern attempts to measure happiness range from cameras tracking smiles at festivals to wearable devices monitoring stress levels. Like sonar mapping the ocean floor, these technologies aim to make subjective experience visible and comparable. Yet a perpetual uneasiness persists-no measure ever seems adequate to happiness's philosophical importance.
This reveals the central paradox of happiness science: if happiness has the grand philosophical status Bentham grants it as life's ultimate purpose, how could such a profound entity be scientifically measured? Conversely, if happiness is merely physical sensation, why should such mundane brain activity carry fundamental political importance?
4장
When Money Became the Measure of Feeling
Joseph Priestley, whose work inspired Bentham, heavily influenced England's industrial middle class. William Stanley Jevons, born into a Unitarian family in 1835, was immersed in this tradition from childhood. After briefly studying chemistry and working as a gold assayer in Australia, his experience with precision instruments for weighing precious metals would later influence his economic theories.
Money performs two contradictory functions: store of value and medium of exchange. This contradiction manifests in its physical design and creates psychological havoc. Liberal economics attempts to manage this bipolar character through the concept of "value"-a mysterious entity inside goods that makes them equivalent to money.
Jevons, along with Walras and Menger, revolutionized economics by shifting value determination from producers to consumers. Unlike earlier economists who focused on factories and labor, Jevons centered his theory on the psychology of pleasure and pain, viewing economics as the science of "maximizing pleasure." This shift coincided with profound economic changes-department stores opened, nationwide rail networks moved goods faster, and retail culture with paper money emerged. Capitalism transformed into an arena of psychological experiences where physical objects merely served as props for sensations.
Yet Jevons left a fundamental question unanswered: if markets work effectively, why is a science of pleasure necessary at all? Post-Jevons economists increasingly distanced themselves from psychological theories, developing preference theory instead. By the 1930s, economics had completely divorced from psychology-economists no longer needed to know how much pleasure a pizza gives someone, only whether they prefer pizza to salad.
The concept of homo economicus-that calculating, self-interested figure constantly pursuing personal advantage-began as a market theory but expanded dramatically in the late twentieth century to become a theory of justice itself. Economic valuation techniques now settle public moral controversies, as seen when Alaska used "willingness to pay surveys" to determine Exxon's $2.8 billion fine for the Valdez oil spill. The public may speak, but only in the language of metrics and prices, mimicking calculators rather than expressing moral judgments.
5장
The Psychology of Consumer Manipulation
In 1879, Wilhelm Wundt designated part of his Leipzig University office as the world's first psychology laboratory. This symbolic separation marked psychology as distinct from both physiology and philosophy, suggesting the psyche exists in its own domain between natural biology and philosophical ideas. His lab built instruments to test responses to stimuli, borrowed tools to time neural reflexes, and created tachistoscopes to measure attention.
Wundt's laboratory transformed him into an academic celebrity, attracting ambitious scholars to Leipzig and overseeing an astonishing 187 doctoral projects during his career. American scholars, hungry for expertise, flocked to German universities-fifty thousand in total before WWI. Though these Americans found Wundt's philosophical approach distasteful, they were captivated by his laboratory technology. Unlike their European counterparts who pursued psychology as philosophical inquiry, American psychologists aimed to provide management tools for industry.
In 1913, animal psychologist John B. Watson delivered a lecture at Columbia University that launched behaviourism, explicitly offering psychology's services to "the educator, the physician, the jurist and the businessman." Watson revelled in provocation, declaring thinking as observable as baseball and famously claiming he could turn any child into a successful businessman through conditioning. This approach established a fundamental power imbalance between psychologist and subject. Unlike Wundt, who experimented on informed subjects, Watson preferred ignorant ones, requiring deception to prevent subjects from adjusting their behavior.
Behaviourism found its perfect commercial application after Watson's academic disgrace in 1920, when his affair with graduate student Rosalie Rayner became public. Forced out of Johns Hopkins University, Watson joined J. Walter Thompson advertising agency at four times his academic salary. Watson advised colleagues they weren't selling products but producing psychological responses-don't appeal to existing emotions, but trigger new ones. For Johnson & Johnson, he marketed washing powder by targeting mothers' anxiety, fear and desire for purity.
Watson reluctantly acknowledged humans' tendency to speak, calling it "verbal behaviour" that could play a role in psychological research. Market research techniques moved fluidly between corporate departments, sociology, and political campaigns in the 1930s. The tension between behaviourist techniques and quasi-democratic consumer voice persists in modern marketing-behaviourists want to bypass what people say they feel to manipulate emotions directly, while those who listen often discover desires for authenticity that no product can deliver.
6장
The Managed Mind at Work
Employee disengagement has become a serious economic concern-Gallup studies show only 13% of the global workforce is properly engaged, with active disengagement costing the US economy up to $550 billion annually. This manifests as absenteeism, presenteeism, and chronic low-level mental health problems. For governments, this means lost economic output and increased healthcare costs as disengaged workers gradually sink into generalized inactivity.
Confronted with ambiguous personal problems, managers outsource to consultants who claim scientific authority over others' well-being. These range from qualified practitioners to ill-informed bullies. In the UK, companies like Atos conduct "work capability assessments" with often cruel results, including finding terminally ill people "fit to work." Meanwhile, elite executives pay thousands for "Corporate Athlete" courses and wellness strategies, creating a stark contrast between the punitive approach for the poor and the luxury approach for the wealthy.
The 1840s discovery of energy conservation excited industrialists, but the 1865 discovery of entropy caused anxiety about human fatigue in factories. By the 1880s, physical exhaustion became a serious economic concern. Into this context stepped Frederick Winslow Taylor, who observed factory floors with scientific detachment, identifying inefficiencies in work processes. His breakthrough came at Bethlehem Steel in the 1890s, where he studied pig iron loading, breaking production into individual tasks to be rationalized.
In 1928, Harvard researcher Elton Mayo interviewed female workers at an Illinois telephone plant, asking unusual questions like "If given three wishes, what would they be?" Unlike Taylor's focus on physical productivity, Mayo sought psychological insights into worker happiness. His Hawthorne Studies became legendary in management science, suggesting that workers performed better simply because they were being observed and given attention.
Mayo's approach transformed management from a technique for controlling physical labor into a "soft" psychological skill. Rather than focusing on bodies and money, managers would now manipulate social relationships and feelings to boost productivity-a psychosomatic intervention similar to a placebo.
In 1925, nineteen-year-old medical student Hans Selye noticed something obvious yet profound-all sick patients looked sick, regardless of their specific condition. This insight led him to develop the concept of "stress"-a non-specific biological response to excessive demands. The study of stress became interdisciplinary, particularly relevant to workplace dynamics, where occupational health research in the 1960s revealed how power structures and job design directly impact physical and mental health.
Contemporary corporate wellness programs represent a fusion of healthcare and performance management. Modern workplaces increasingly resemble medical facilities, with employers offering gym memberships and counseling while implementing comprehensive monitoring through "Health 2.0" technologies. Rather than fulfilling the political hope that workplace dialogue might lead to empowerment, we're witnessing Frederick Taylor's scientific management returning in digital form.
7장
The Competitive Pursuit of Happiness
In 1977, sixteen-year-old William Hague injected unexpected youthful energy into Britain's Conservative Party conference with his criticism of the "socialist state." He mocked a London school that supposedly limited children to winning just one race each "for fear that to win more would make the other pupils seem inferior." Yet this competitive culture correlates strongly with depression rates, which are highest in unequal societies like the US and UK. Studies show depression affects not just "losers" but also "winners," with professional athletes twice as likely to experience depression.
Hague's speech came at a pivotal moment when Britain reached peak equality but market deregulation arguments were gaining credibility. The 1960s challenged traditional authority with cultural relativism, raising fundamental questions: How could legitimate decisions be made without shared values? The solution emerged in measurement-replacing qualitative judgments with quantitative ones. Instead of determining what was "good" or "bad," society shifted to measuring "how much."
Chicago's Hyde Park neighborhood forms an eerie sanctuary of peace and scholarship within Chicago's South Side. This isolated cocoon was significant in developing the "Chicago School" of economics that shaped neoliberal policies. The Chicago School economists shared certain traits: a sense of being outsiders, suspicion of government, and a fundamental belief that economics was an objective science of human behavior separate from moral considerations.
The Chicago School developed a devastating critique of regulatory authority, arguing that regulators acted from self-interest rather than public interest. They claimed large corporations generate welfare that liberals failed to recognize-perhaps even more if given free rein. By 1970, Friedman was arguing that a corporation's only moral duty was to maximize profits. Their message to those complaining about corporate dominance was brutal: start your own giant company or accept there's something wrong with you, not society.
Between 1957-1958, psychiatrists Ronald Kuhn and Nathan Kline accidentally discovered drugs that didn't target specific disorders but simply made people feel "more truly themselves" by restoring optimism. These early antidepressants revealed that sadness could be viewed in neurochemical terms. By the late 1960s, psychologists were studying depression without assuming underlying neurosis, with Martin Seligman's "learned helplessness" experiments laying groundwork for positive psychology.
The DSM-III, published in 1980, represented a revolutionary shift in psychiatric practice. Mental illness became something detectable purely through observation and classification, without requiring explanation of underlying causes. Psychiatry lost its capacity to identify problems in society or economy, as mental syndromes were no longer viewed as potentially understandable responses to external circumstances.
In a society valuing optimized personal growth, disorders of personal collapse become inevitable. Depression represents not simply unhappiness but the inability to pursue happiness-sufferers lose the mental and physical resources to pursue things that might make them happy. A culture valuing only optimism produces pathologies of pessimism; a competitive economy turns defeatism into disease.
8장
The Monetization of Social Connection
Imagine entering a coffee shop and discovering your cappuccino has been paid for by the previous customer-with the expectation you'll do the same for the next person. This "pay-it-forward" pricing appears to defy market logic. Yet UC Berkeley researchers discovered people typically pay more under this model than conventional pricing. While appearing to challenge the cold rationality of markets by revealing our social and moral motivations, behavioral economics ultimately instrumentalizes these insights for control.
Generosity has become big business. Corporations seek market freedom while limiting it for others, maintaining executive autonomy while gaining customer commitment. Free offerings disguise market relationships, with even gratitude being monetized. Corporations now project friendship through social media, tweeting conversationally at each other. The "sharing economy" (Airbnb, Uber) teaches businesses that people enjoy purchasing more when it feels like friendship. Marketers see payment as a "pain point" requiring anaesthetizing with social experiences.
Social networks have become tools for health policy intervention. Medical sociologist Nicholas Christakis demonstrated to government policymakers how problems like obesity and depression move through social networks like contagions. Research shows loneliness is a greater health risk than smoking, leading to practices like "social prescribing" where doctors recommend joining choirs or organizations. Positive psychology promotes gratitude, giving and empathy as alternatives to cold market exchange-yet ultimately justifies this altruism through self-interest: giving makes the giver happier.
In 1893, four-year-old Jacob Moreno played "God" with neighborhood children as his "angels," launching himself from a stack of chairs and breaking his arm. As an adult psychoanalyst, he developed theories where individuals were gods in their social worlds, limited only by their social groups-which themselves could be improved. In New York, Moreno developed sociometry to study how individuals could remain "free agents" while forming harmonious social groups. His breakthrough came at Sing Sing prison and later at the New York Training School for Girls, where he created the first visual sociometric maps showing webs of connections between people.
The case of a teenage World of Warcraft addict reveals how social media addiction stems from seeking human interaction without sacrificing personal autonomy. This represents an extreme version of widespread social media addiction, estimated to affect 38% of American adults. Social media users compulsively seek validation while maintaining complete control over interactions, creating vicious cycles where relationships are reduced to psychological pleasure-delivery systems.
Traditional critiques of capitalism's individualism and materialism now come from unexpected sources-marketing gurus, self-help authors, and behavioral economists. Yet rather than offering systemic alternatives, they merely provide slightly modified theories of individual psychology. This "neoliberal socialism" celebrates sharing and empathy but only as habits that economically successful individuals practice.
9장
The Surveillance of Happiness
Business practices don't spread naturally-they require cultural and political barriers to be forcefully broken down. JWT's global expansion encountered significant resistance when attempting to profile European consumers in the 1920s. British researchers were arrested conducting door-to-door surveys, a Copenhagen interviewer was thrown down stairs, and the German Automobile Manufacturer's Association threatened to sue for "business espionage."
Three technological and cultural shifts have transformed psychological surveillance: First, "big data" from digitized everyday transactions creates vast analyzable records. Second, cultural narcissism has been harnessed as research opportunity-while people resist traditional surveys, they eagerly share thoughts, tastes and opinions on platforms like Facebook. Third, computers can now "read" human emotions through sentiment analysis and facial scanning technologies.
As digital surveillance advances, researchers can analyze vast data streams like Twitter's 500 million daily tweets to measure happiness. University of Pittsburgh psychologists have built algorithms that score tweets on a 1-9 happiness scale by assigning values to words. Mobile "mood tracking" apps like Moodscope, Track Your Happiness, and Mappiness now allow researchers to gather real-time emotional data directly from users. These technologies bypass traditional survey limitations, where cultural norms and memory affect self-reporting.
The Hudson Yards development in Manhattan exemplifies the new "quantified community" approach, where an entire urban environment becomes a vast psychology lab. Unlike traditional surveys requiring specific research questions, this project collects massive data on pedestrian flows, traffic, energy use, and resident health by default-gathering everything first and determining applications later.
The happiness industry is now developing technologies that unify different measures of well-being. Russia's Alfa-Bank created an Activity Savings Account linking fitness tracking to financial rewards, while Moscow's subway experimented with exercise-based ticket payments. These innovations attempt to merge bodily and monetary indicators into a single measurement system-the ultimate utilitarian dream. Yet this monistic approach fundamentally misunderstands happiness, which cannot be reduced to a single quantifiable index.
10장
Beyond the Happiness Industry
Working outdoors, particularly with nature, offers recognized psychological benefits. Growing Well, a ten-acre vegetable farm in Cumbria, has proven highly successful as a mental health intervention. The project's founder, Beren Aldridge, views it not as a medical treatment but as a business structured as a cooperative where volunteers can participate in decision-making and management at various levels.
How we explain and respond to human unhappiness is fundamentally an ethical and political question about where we place blame. Beyond behaviorist and utilitarian approaches, alternative traditions recognize that disempowerment occurs through social, political, and economic structures-not neural errors. Research consistently shows mental illness correlates with economic inequality, unemployment, lack of workplace autonomy, and materialistic values. The critical issue is power distribution-when people feel buffeted by forces beyond their control, they're more vulnerable to psychological breakdown.
Since the 1980s, successive "decades of the brain" have dramatically increased public investment in neuroscience. Obama's BRAIN Initiative is projected to cost $3 billion, while the European Commission invested nearly 2 billion in neuroscience projects between 2007-13. The Pentagon has been a major driver of neuroscience in the US, seeing opportunities to influence enemy combatants and produce more "resilient" soldiers. This utilitarian, biological and behaviorist approach to human life has acquired near-monopoly status because the greatest sources of power and wealth have ensured its dominance.
When faced with the harsh, rationalist science of mind that reduces everything to mechanical forces, the temptation to embrace mysticism grows stronger. Mindfulness and positive psychology exemplify this, shifting seamlessly between scientific facts about brains and quasi-Buddhist practices. This creates two separate languages-one for the powerful experts and another for the powerless public-undermining inclusive political deliberation.
Witnessing someone's brain "light up" requires expensive technology-an fMRI scanner costs $1 million with annual operating costs of $100,000-$300,000. These technologies increasingly translate our everyday language of moods and choices into physical brain regions. Psychology repeatedly errs by modeling itself on physiology or biology-whether through Jevons' mechanical mind, Watson's observable behavior, Selye's bodily stress, or marketers' brain-based decisions.
Psychology and social science remain possible under Wittgenstein's conditions-they're simply more straightforward. Understanding others through their behavior and speech isn't fundamentally different from everyday human understanding. The most important methodology remains simple: just ask people what they're feeling. That this approach isn't taken seriously by managerial elites isn't surprising-it requires deliberation, credits people with legitimate interpretations of their circumstances, and demands listening skills that have been submerged in societies privileging observation over hearing.
What if even a fraction of the billions spent monitoring, predicting and visualizing our minds were redirected toward designing alternative political-economic systems? Many psychiatrists and psychologists recognize that mental health problems often stem from broader social, political or economic breakdowns rather than individual pathology. Businesses organized around dialogue and cooperative control could offer an alternative to psychological management techniques that corporations have relied on since the 1920s. While complete workplace democracy isn't realistic, current hierarchical structures are failing even on efficiency grounds.
