What is *Right Kind of Wrong* by Amy Edmondson about?

*Right Kind of Wrong* explores how to reframe failure as a catalyst for growth, distinguishing between preventable "basic failures," unavoidable "complex failures," and productive "intelligent failures." Amy Edmondson, a Harvard leadership expert, combines research and case studies to teach readers how to embrace uncertainty, learn from mistakes, and build psychological safety in teams. The book emphasizes actionable strategies to fail wisely in careers and organizations.

Who should read *Right Kind of Wrong*?

Leaders, managers, innovators, and anyone navigating high-stakes environments will benefit from this book. It’s particularly relevant for professionals in tech, healthcare, or education seeking to foster cultures of learning and resilience. Edmondson’s insights also resonate with individuals overcoming setbacks or pursuing creative risks.

Is *Right Kind of Wrong* worth reading?

Yes—critics praise its blend of academic rigor and accessibility, though some note repetitive sections. Readers gain a structured framework to analyze failures, with tools like the "Failure Spectrum" and "Intelligent Failure Checklist." Endorsements from Adam Grant and Daniel Pink highlight its value for personal and professional growth.

What are the main concepts in *Right Kind of Wrong*?

Key ideas include: - **Psychological safety**: Creating environments where teams can admit mistakes without blame. - **Failure taxonomy**: Categorizing failures as basic (preventable), complex (systemic), or intelligent (productive experiments). - **Learning loops**: Using reflection and feedback to convert failures into improvements.

How does *Right Kind of Wrong* define "intelligent failure"?

Intelligent failures occur in novel situations where outcomes are uncertain, involve hypothesis-testing, and produce learnings outweighing costs. Examples include pharmaceutical trials or startups pivoting based on early feedback. Edmondson argues these failures are essential for innovation.

What quotes from *Right Kind of Wrong* are notable?

- **“Failure is not the opposite of success; it’s a stepping stone.”** - **“Psychological safety isn’t about being nice—it’s about candor.”** These emphasize embracing vulnerability and honest communication to drive progress.

How does *Right Kind of Wrong* compare to Edmondson’s *The Fearless Organization*?

While *The Fearless Organization* focuses on psychological safety’s role in team performance, *Right Kind of Wrong* expands the scope to individual and organizational resilience through failure analysis. Both books interconnect but serve distinct purposes: one builds safe environments, the other leverages those environments for growth.

What critiques exist about *Right Kind of Wrong*?

Some readers find the failure taxonomy overly academic or repetitive if familiar with Carol Dweck’s mindset work. Others note it underemphasizes systemic barriers to failure tolerance in hierarchical organizations.

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약

실패를 배우는 것이 어떻게 우리를 번창하게 만드는가

에이미 에드먼슨

3.92(2341 Reviews)

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약 개요

하버드 대학교 에이미 에드먼드슨 교수의 수상작 "가장 인간적인 실수(Right Kind of Wrong)"를 통해 왜 실패가 당신의 가장 큰 자산인지 확인해 보세요. 파이낸셜 타임스 2023년 올해의 비즈니스 도서로 선정된 이 책은 혁신을 주도하는 세 가지 유형의 실패를 밝혀냅니다. 다니엘 핑크는 이 책을 필수 도서로 꼽으며 다음과 같이 말했습니다. "실패로부터 배우는 것보다 더 중요한 기술은 없다."

전달 방식을 선택하세요

다양한 학습 방식으로 두 번째 기회는 없다 요약 살펴보기

두 번째 기회는 없다의 같은 아이디어를 담았습니다. 나에게 맞는 목소리, 깊이, 속도를 고르고 언제든 바꿔 보세요.

1장

When Failing Becomes a Masterclass in Success

The Right Kind of Wrong isn't just another business book-it's a revolutionary framework for understanding one of humanity's most feared experiences. Harvard professor Amy Edmondson, named the #1 management thinker globally in 2021, delivers what Angela Duckworth calls "a master class in navigating failure." This book has become required reading in top business schools and a favorite among executives at companies like Microsoft, where CEO Satya Nadella credits similar thinking for transforming their culture. What makes Edmondson's approach so powerful is that it reframes failure not as something to avoid but as something to leverage strategically. Drawing from her pioneering work on psychological safety-research that Google identified as the key factor in high-performing teams-Edmondson shows why our relationship with failure determines our capacity for innovation, learning, and ultimately, success.

2장

The Failure Landscape: Not All Failures Are Created Equal

Imagine this: A five-year-old girl lies on an operating table in 1951 as Dr. Clarence Dennis attempts groundbreaking heart surgery using an experimental heart-lung bypass machine. Despite meticulous preparation, the operation reveals an unexpected condition-multiple heart holes rather than one-leading to uncontrollable bleeding and the child's death. A month later, a second attempt on a two-year-old fails when human error causes air to enter the blood supply. Devastating failures, certainly. Yet these very failures were essential steps toward medical progress. Today, millions of successful open-heart surgeries are performed annually using descendants of Dennis's machine. This illustrates Edmondson's central insight: not all failures are equal. Some deserve blame, others deserve celebration, and most fall somewhere in between. Edmondson identifies three distinct types of failure that create a comprehensive "failure landscape": Intelligent failures occur in new territory where answers aren't knowable in advance. These failures are valuable precisely because they generate new knowledge that couldn't be obtained any other way. When scientists experience 70% failure rates in their experiments, they're not making mistakes-they're exploring unknown territory where failure is the only path to discovery. Basic failures happen in known territory where procedures exist but aren't followed. These are preventable mistakes like burning cookies because you forgot to set a timer or causing a traffic accident while texting. Unlike intelligent failures, basic failures waste resources without generating new knowledge. Complex failures involve multiple factors converging unexpectedly in familiar settings. The Torrey Canyon oil spill exemplifies this: ocean currents, fog, mechanical issues, and time pressure combined to create Britain's worst environmental disaster. No single factor was sufficient to cause the catastrophe-it required multiple small problems aligning in just the wrong way. Understanding these distinctions helps us respond appropriately to different failure types. When Thomas Edison said he hadn't failed but found 10,000 ways that wouldn't work, he was celebrating intelligent failure. When Paul O'Neill transformed Alcoa by focusing on worker safety, he was preventing basic failures. And when aviation experts developed Crew Resource Management after analyzing crashes, they were addressing complex failures by improving communication systems.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

3장

The Psychology of Failure: Why We're Wired to Fail at Failing

Why is failing well so difficult? Our brains are literally wired against it. Edmondson identifies three fundamental barriers: aversion (our instinctive emotional response), confusion (lacking a practical framework for distinguishing failure types), and fear (social stigma). Our negativity bias makes us process negative information more readily than positive, remember negative events more vividly, and notice bad more quickly than good. This bias likely offered survival advantages to early humans, as rejection from the tribe could mean death. We also suffer from loss aversion-the tendency to overweigh losses compared to equivalent gains. Research by Eskreis-Winkler and Fishbach reveals we actually learn less from failure than success. In multiple studies, participants who received failure feedback performed worse on subsequent tests than those who received success feedback. The researchers concluded that failure is "ego threatening, which causes people to tune out." Interestingly, when observing others' failures rather than experiencing our own, we learn just as effectively as from successes. Social media exacerbates our reluctance to share failures by emphasizing curated perfection. Studies show platforms like Instagram harm self-esteem and body image, particularly for teenage girls. Facebook's own leaked internal research confirmed that Instagram makes body image issues worse for one-third of teen girls. Our brains process failure through two pathways: the "low road" (fast, instinctive, automatic processing) and the "high road" (slow, thoughtful, rational processing). When we encounter failure, our natural tendency is to process it through the low road, triggering immediate fear responses in the amygdala. While this fast pathway can be lifesaving in true emergencies, in modern life we're more often activated by perceived threats than real ones. Against these powerful psychological forces, Edmondson offers cognitive reframing as the antidote. Carol Dweck's research contrasts fixed mindsets (believing abilities are innate) with growth mindsets (viewing challenges as opportunities to learn). By pausing to challenge our automatic thoughts, reframing them, and choosing learning over knowing, we can break the link between what happens to us and how we respond.

4장

Situation Awareness: Matching Your Approach to Context

One of Edmondson's most valuable insights is that our approach to failure should vary dramatically depending on the situation we're in. She illustrates this through an exercise called the Electric Maze, where participants must find a path through beeping and non-beeping squares. Most teams fail because they hesitate, fearing mistakes when stepping on beeping squares-not realizing that discovering both beeping and non-beeping squares provides valuable information. The key insight: we often bring an execution mindset to learning tasks, misconstruing the context and creating unnecessary anxiety. Practicing the science of failing well requires awareness of two dimensions: how much is known (degree of novelty) and what's at stake (level of risk). Contexts range from consistent (like following a recipe) to variable (like teaching a class) to novel (like starting a business). The rule of thumb is to cheerfully accept failures with low consequences while taking measures to prevent high-stakes failures. Julia Child exemplified this when she lightheartedly recovered from kitchen mishaps on television, making cooking approachable for viewers. Lack of situation awareness leads to preventable failures, often due to "naive realism"-the erroneous sense that we see reality objectively rather than through filters created by our background or expertise. This cognitive bias makes us interpret variable or novel situations as predictable, causing overconfidence that leads to preventable failures. When Coca-Cola launched Dasani water in the UK, they failed to anticipate cultural differences. Unlike in the US where bottled water was seen as convenient and healthy, UK consumers viewed bottled water as coming from natural springs. Though Coca-Cola correctly labeled Dasani as "purified water," they failed to anticipate cultural differences. When testing revealed the water exceeded legal limits for bromate (a carcinogen), negative publicity forced a recall of half a million bottles. The company never returned Dasani to the UK market and wrote off 7 million in advertising. Similarly, the 2013 launch of HealthCare.gov demonstrates the consequences of underestimating novelty. Despite two years of development and over a billion dollars in funding, the website designed to implement the Affordable Care Act failed spectacularly on launch day-only six people could properly use it. Federal officials "failed to recognize the enormity of the undertaking," ignored warnings, and created an environment where reporting problems felt unsafe.

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

5장

System Awareness: Seeing Beyond Individual Parts

Systems thinking-the third essential competency for failing well-means expanding your focus from "here and now" to include "elsewhere and later." Two fundamental questions drive this perspective: Who else will be affected by this decision? What additional consequences might occur in the future? These questions help reveal the intricate web of relationships and downstream effects that often remain hidden in complex organizations. The Beer Game, a classic classroom exercise developed by MIT professor Jay Forrester, powerfully demonstrates how systems create unintended consequences. In this simulation, four people form a beer supply chain: retailer, wholesaler, distributor, and factory. Each player makes weekly ordering decisions without communicating with teammates except through orders and deliveries. Even experienced executives consistently generate the same problematic patterns, showing how system structure influences behavior more than individual skill. The simulation quickly produces frustrating oscillations in ordering patterns and inventory levels, with typical results showing massive overordering followed by costly excess inventory. Despite each player making seemingly rational decisions to minimize their local costs, the combined effect creates wasteful system-wide cost overruns often 10 times higher than necessary. The fundamental cause is players optimizing their individual performance without considering system-wide impacts, a pattern that repeats in real organizations daily. Systems thinking helps us recognize that failures often stem from complex relationships within systems rather than single-point failures. For example, when an airplane crashes, investigators typically find multiple contributing factors rather than one clear cause. This perspective doesn't absolve us of responsibility but helps us recognize that we operate within larger systems with relationships beyond our complete control. Organizations can design systems that reinforce key priorities like quality, safety, or innovation through multiple complementary elements. 3M exemplifies this approach with interconnected components: a company golf course encouraging informal connections across departments, the Technical Forum for sharing ideas across divisions, and the famous 15% policy allowing engineers to pursue experimental projects on company time. These elements create a reinforcing cycle of innovation and collaboration. The Post-it Note's development illustrates this system at work-Spencer Silver's "failed" adhesive became a breakthrough product because 3M's system connected him with Arthur Fry, who saw its potential for bookmarks. The product might never have succeeded in a more traditionally structured organization. Toyota's Production System creates "a community of scientists" where problems are viewed as opportunities for improvement rather than failures to be hidden. The Andon Cord system, which allows any worker to halt production upon detecting a potential quality issue, symbolizes the system's ethos: valuing employee input about problems to enable immediate correction and learning. This approach creates multiple feedback loops that catch issues early and turn them into improvement opportunities. As plant manager Fujio Cho memorably told an executive: "Please talk to us about your problems so we can work on them together." This system thinking approach has helped Toyota maintain industry-leading quality while continuously improving efficiency. The key insight is that successful organizations don't just focus on individual components but design integrated systems where multiple elements reinforce desired behaviors and outcomes. They recognize that sustainable success requires understanding and managing the complex web of relationships that influence how work actually gets done.

6장

Mastering the Science of Failing Well

How do we thrive as fallible human beings? Thriving begins with accepting our fallibility - not just intellectually understanding it, but emotionally embracing it as part of the human condition. Self-acceptance takes courage but brings freedom-being honest with oneself is the first step toward honesty with others. Failing well means preventing basic failures when possible, anticipating complex ones, and cultivating an appetite for intelligent failures that lead to growth and innovation. However, the license to fail is unequally distributed across society. As scholar Adam Bradley powerfully points out, "One of the greatest underrecognized privileges of whiteness might be the license it gives some to fail without fear." For minorities, individual failures often reflect badly on entire groups, creating an unfair burden where personal setbacks can reinforce negative stereotypes. Women in academic science similarly lack the luxury of failing unobtrusively, feeling intense pressure to succeed lest they inadvertently close doors for others following in their footsteps. This "representative burden" creates additional stress and can inhibit the very risk-taking that drives innovation. Several essential practices can help build a healthy relationship with failure: Persistence, as powerfully exemplified by Sara Blakely's Spanx journey. At 27, while selling fax machines door-to-door, she cut the feet off pantyhose to create footless shapewear. She faced constant rejection - manufacturers dismissed her, patent lawyers laughed at her idea, and retailers were skeptical. For two years, she worked on Spanx at night while keeping her day job. Her unwavering persistence eventually made her the youngest self-made female billionaire according to Forbes, transforming a $5,000 investment into a billion-dollar company. Reflection, demonstrated by professional musicians who maintain detailed practice journals to document their sessions, emotional states, goals, and mistakes. Rob Knopper, a Metropolitan Opera Orchestra percussionist, coaches musicians on learning from mistakes after "failing through years of unsuccessful auditions." He advocates keeping systematic practice journals that track specific obstacles, attempted solutions, and outcomes. This methodical approach turns failures into data points for improvement rather than sources of shame. Accountability, which requires the courage to acknowledge your contribution to failures without spiraling into emotional devastation or shame. It means directly stating "I did it" rather than succumbing to our hardwired fundamental attribution error - the tendency to blame external factors for our failures while attributing others' failures to their character. True accountability involves examining our role while maintaining perspective about the broader context. Apologizing effectively, which research from the University of Ohio shows increases positive emotions and forgiveness while reducing negative feelings and even lowering heart rates in both parties. Effective apologies contain three key elements: expressing genuine remorse, accepting clear responsibility, and offering concrete ways to make amends. The focus should be on impact rather than intention, acknowledging how our actions affected others regardless of what we meant to do. Studies show that apologies containing these elements repair trust significantly better than partial apologies or explanations.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

7장

Creating a Culture Where Failure Fuels Success

While individuals can practice the science of failing well, it's most effective within a healthy failure culture. Several key practices and structural elements can help build such cultures in important communities and organizations: Call attention to context and set realistic expectations. When Captain Ben Berman tells his flight crew "I've never flown a perfect flight, and it's not going to happen today," he's normalizing imperfection and creating psychological safety. Similarly, when Children's Hospital COO Julie Morath acknowledges that "healthcare is a complex error-prone system," she's creating space for honest discussions about mistakes. This contextual framing helps team members understand that perfection isn't the goal - continuous learning and improvement are. Encourage systematic failure sharing through structured programs. C&A CEO Giny Boer established "Failure Fridays" where colleagues share mistakes and lessons learned in a supportive environment. These sessions aren't just about confessing errors - they're opportunities to extract valuable insights and prevent similar mistakes across the organization. The concept has spread globally through initiatives like the Failure Institute's "Fuckup Nights" events, now spanning 300+ cities, where entrepreneurs and professionals share failure stories in celebratory environments. Academic Melanie Stefan's "CV of Failures" concept (later popularized by economist Johannes Haushofer) encourages professionals to document their setbacks alongside successes, showing that failure is a natural part of any career journey. Reward and recognize productive failure through formal programs. Grey Advertising's "Heroic Failure Award," launched by Tor Myhren after his own Super Bowl ad failure, celebrates bold creative attempts that didn't succeed but advanced learning. Before creating E*Trade's successful talking baby campaign, Myhren's previous failure taught valuable lessons about risk-taking in advertising. Similarly, Tata Group's "Dare to Try Award" celebrates innovation attempts that failed but demonstrated courage and learning potential. NASA's "Lean Forward, Fail Smart Award," created in response to the Columbia disaster, recognizes teams who identify and address potential failures before they become catastrophic. Monitor cultural health through communication patterns. A healthy failure culture can be diagnosed by examining the flow and nature of information: if you're only hearing good news, progress reports, agreement, and "all's well" messages, it's likely that problems are being suppressed rather than addressed. Look for organizations where bad news travels fast, problems are surfaced early, dissent is welcomed, and requests for help are viewed as signs of wisdom rather than weakness. Leaders should actively encourage and reward these positive communication patterns while addressing any signs of failure-avoidance or problem-hiding behaviors. Build failure resilience through systematic learning processes. Organizations should establish clear protocols for analyzing failures, extracting lessons, and implementing improvements. This includes regular after-action reviews, blameless post-mortems, and structured learning sessions that focus on system improvements rather than individual blame.

8장

The Transformative Power of Intelligent Failure

Ray Dalio's dramatic failure provides a powerful lesson in humility. At age 33, the Bridgewater Associates founder bet everything on an economic prediction that proved catastrophically wrong. He had confidently predicted a global economic depression when Latin American countries defaulted on their debt in 1982. Instead of a recession, the U.S. economy began one of its longest growth periods, leaving Dalio broke and forced to lay off his employees. Though devastating, this failure transformed his thinking from "I'm right" to asking "How do I know I'm right?" This fundamental shift in mindset led him to develop his famous "radical transparency" approach and principles-based decision-making system that helped him build Bridgewater into the largest, most profitable hedge fund in history, managing over $150 billion in assets. Similarly, when Barbe-Nicole Ponsardin Clicquot was widowed at 27 in 1805 France, she faced an unexpected opportunity in a male-dominated industry. Rather than retreating to quiet domesticity as society expected, she continued the struggling champagne business she had started with her husband Francois, despite terrible business conditions during Napoleon's wars. The business nearly collapsed multiple times, with entire shipments lost to pirates and warfare. After years of relentless failures and experimentation, she revolutionized champagne production with her ingenious "pupitres" rack design that allowed bottles to be tilted and rotated at precise angles, efficiently clearing sediment and enabling high-volume production of clear sparkling wine. This innovation, known as "remuage" or riddling, became the industry standard. By summer 1815, Veuve Clicquot was shipping thousands of bottles to Russia and across Europe, establishing the brand as a symbol of luxury and excellence. These stories reveal failure as essential to success-accepting what you can't control while taking thoughtful risks and learning continuously. The science of failing well isn't about avoiding failure but about failing intelligently-making failures small enough to survive but meaningful enough to learn from. This approach requires three key elements: maintaining a growth mindset that views failures as learning opportunities, creating systems to capture and analyze lessons from failures, and developing the resilience to persist through setbacks. Successful innovators typically fail hundreds of times before achieving breakthrough success, but they fail forward, using each setback to refine their approach and challenge their assumptions. Modern companies like Google X embrace this philosophy through their "rapid iteration" approach, celebrating fast failures and maintaining "post-mortem" documentation of failed projects. Amazon's Jeff Bezos frequently reminds shareholders that Amazon's success is built on "billions of dollars of failures," including the Fire Phone and other unsuccessful ventures that ultimately led to winning innovations like AWS and Alexa. These examples demonstrate how intelligent failure, when properly harnessed, becomes a powerful catalyst for innovation and growth.

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

9장

Embracing Our Fallibility as the Path to Excellence

Discernment lies at the heart of failing well. We must develop the wisdom to distinguish between different types of failures, assess situations accurately, and confront our own shortcomings. The framework of failure types isn't about rigid classifications but helping us think differently to take thoughtful action. Whether facing small daily setbacks or major professional defeats, our ability to accurately categorize and learn from these experiences determines their ultimate value. Though confronting ourselves is the hardest part of failing well, it's ultimately the most liberating. As Billie Jean King wisely observed: "For me, losing a tennis match isn't failure. It's research." This mindset shift transforms defeats from crushing blows into valuable data points. Consider how Thomas Edison viewed his thousands of unsuccessful attempts at creating the light bulb not as failures but as successfully identifying ways that wouldn't work. Similarly, James Dyson's journey through 5,126 failed prototypes before creating his revolutionary vacuum cleaner demonstrates how persistence through failure leads to breakthrough innovation. In a world increasingly characterized by uncertainty and rapid change, our ability to fail well may be the most important skill we can develop. This is particularly evident in rapidly evolving fields like technology and entrepreneurship, where the mantra "fail fast, fail forward" has become a guiding principle. Companies like Google actively encourage calculated risk-taking and learning from failure, maintaining "post-mortem" practices to extract maximum learning from unsuccessful projects. Even their ambitious "moonshot" projects, with their high failure rates, are viewed as essential learning opportunities. The science of failing well isn't just about making peace with our fallibility-it's about leveraging it as our greatest source of wisdom, resilience, and ultimately, success. This approach requires developing specific habits: maintaining detailed failure logs, conducting regular self-assessments, seeking feedback from trusted mentors, and creating safe spaces for honest discussion of mistakes. Organizations that institutionalize these practices, like hospitals conducting mortality and morbidity conferences, transform individual failures into collective learning opportunities. By reframing failure as a necessary component of growth rather than something to be avoided, we can transform our relationship with this inevitable human experience. This mindset shift allows us to innovate boldly, learn continuously, and build the emotional resilience necessary for long-term achievement. Success, viewed through this lens, becomes not the absence of failure but rather the culmination of failing well-intelligently, reflectively, and with an unwavering commitment to growth.

★★★★★

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약 완독을 축하합니다

“23일째 매일 사용하고 있어요. 이제 제 일상의 한 부분이 되었습니다.”

jayallen

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약의 핵심 주제

intelligent failure
psychological safety
growth mindset
error management
organizational learning

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약의 명문장

Not all failures are equal.
Our brains are literally wired against it.
Failure is 'ego threatening, which causes people to tune out.'
Social media exacerbates our reluctance to share failures.
We often bring an execution mindset to learning tasks.

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약의 등장인물

Amy EdmondsonAuthor and Harvard professor of management
Dr. Clarence DennisSurgeon who pioneered heart-lung bypass machines
Paul O'NeillFormer Alcoa CEO focused on worker safety

저자 소개

*올바른 실패(Right Kind of Wrong: The Science of Failing Well)*의 저자인 에이미 에드먼드슨(Amy C. Edmondson)은 세계적인 조직 리더십 전문가이자 하버드 경영대학원의 노바티스 리더십 및 경영학 교수입니다. 심리적 안정감과 팀 역학 분야의 선구적인 연구자인 에드먼드슨의 연구는 조직이 어떻게 실패를 혁신의 촉매제로 활용할 수 있는지를 탐구하며, 이는 이 비즈니스 및 자기계발서의 핵심 주제이기도 합니다.

그녀의 통찰은 수십 년간 고성과 팀을 연구한 결과에서 비롯되었으며, 특히 MBA 프로그램에서 널리 가르치는 베스트셀러 *두려움 없는 조직(The Fearless Organization)*과 *티밍(Teaming)*에 자세히 기술되어 있습니다.

Thinkers50이 선정한 2023년 경영 사상가 1위에 오른 에드먼드슨은 TED 강연(조회수 400만 회 이상)과 하버드 비즈니스 리뷰의 *아이디어캐스트(IdeaCast)*와 같은 팟캐스트를 통해 자신의 연구를 활발히 공유하고 있습니다. 그녀의 프레임워크는 회복 탄력성이 있고 학습 중심적인 문화를 구축하려는 포춘 500대 기업과 여러 기관에서 채택되고 있습니다. 올바른 실패는 그녀의 획기적인 연구를 실행 가능한 전략으로 요약하여, 성공에 있어 실패의 역할을 재정의하는 선도적인 목소리로서 그녀의 명성을 공고히 해줍니다.

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약 다운로드

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약을 무료 PDF 또는 EPUB으로 받으세요. 인쇄하거나 오프라인에서 언제든 읽을 수 있습니다.

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

The Fearless Organization

Amy C. Edmondson

Kathryn Schulz

Matthew Syed

Amy Shoenthal

Elizabeth Day

Susan Kahn

Manu Kapur

Succeeding when you're supposed to fail

Rom Brafman

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약에 관한 자주 묻는 질문

더 알아보기

학습 계획

Beyond Blame: Correcting the Fundamental Attribution Error

In an increasingly polarized world, understanding why we judge others unfairly is a critical leadership and social skill. This plan is ideal for managers, educators, and anyone looking to improve their emotional intelligence by mastering the psychological roots of human behavior.

1 h 15 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Thinking, Fast and Slow: Decision Toolkit

In an era of information overload, understanding the mechanics of human judgment is a critical superpower for leaders and professionals. This toolkit is essential for anyone looking to minimize cognitive errors and master the psychological drivers behind every choice we make.

3 h 15 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Unshakable: The Mistake-Proof Mindset

This plan is essential for athletes who struggle with performance anxiety or the tendency to dwell on errors. It provides the mental tools needed to transition from self-doubt to instinctive, high-stakes execution.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Think like Nassim taleb

In an increasingly volatile world, traditional linear thinking often leads to catastrophic failure. This plan is essential for decision-makers, investors, and strategists who want to move beyond mere resilience and learn to profit from uncertainty.

5 h 30 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Science of Self-Sabotage

This plan is essential for high-achievers and chronic caretakers who feel stuck in repetitive patterns of failure or burnout. It offers a deep dive into the neurobiology of behavior, making it ideal for anyone looking to reclaim control over their choices and mental well-being.

30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Stop the Self-Punishment Cycle

High achievers and perfectionists often fall into a trap where self-criticism becomes a barrier to progress rather than a motivator. This plan provides the tools to dismantle negative internal dialogues and build the resilience needed to face uncertainty without self-punishment.

48 m•2 섹션

학습 계획

The Arrival Fallacy and the Science of Satisfaction

High-achievers often find themselves trapped in a cycle of chasing milestones that never yield the expected joy. This plan is essential for anyone struggling with burnout or the 'what's next' syndrome, offering a scientific roadmap to decouple identity from external validation.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

The Science of Unbreakable Discipline

Traditional grit often fails because it ignores how the brain actually functions. This plan is designed for high-performers and chronic procrastinators who want to leverage neuroscience and environmental design to achieve long-term goals without the constant struggle of mental fatigue.

2 h•4 섹션

컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 제작 | 샌프란시스코에서 개발

BeFreed는 호기심 넘치는 글로벌 커뮤니티를 하나로 연결합니다

4.7

평균 평점

앱 평가 7.84천 개 이상

BeFreed 커뮤니티

정말이지 아직 앱을 다 써 보지도 않았는데, 며칠 써 본 것만으로도 깊은 인상을 받았어요… BeFreed는 제가 써 본 어떤 학습 앱과도 차원이 달라요. 몰입감이 엄청나고 집중력도 실제로 좋아져서, 스마트폰을 하염없이 스크롤하는 분들께 딱이에요!

@ladyInfinity

정확히 23일 전에 BeFreed를 구입했는데, 그날부터 하루도 빠짐없이 쓰고 있어요. 제 일상 업무 흐름과 학습 습관에 완전히 자리 잡았어요.

@jayallen

솔직히 이 앱은 제 기대를 전부 뛰어넘었어요. 어떤 주제든 오디오로 만들어 달라고 할 수 있고, 결과물이 놀라워요. 제 전문 분야는 심리치료 쪽이고 여러 학문이 얽혀 있는데도 답변이 아주 정확해요.

@Raguipa

제일 고마운 건 스크롤하는 시간이 확 줄었다는 거예요. 검색하는 시간은 줄고 흡수하는 시간은 늘었어요. 오디오북 전권, 팟캐스트, 학습 플랜의 조합이 정말 훌륭해요.

@colonyofcreatorsNGO

저는 24년째 PhotoReading 속진 학습 강사로 일하고 있어요… 책과 독서, 배움이 제 전문인데, BeFreed는 정보를 소화하기 쉽게 전달하는 혁신적인 방식을 정말 잘 구현했어요.

@BeFreed user

단순한 책 요약 앱이 아니에요. '재미' 스타일을 써 봤는데, 전통적인 방식보다 훨씬 나은 요약이고 아이디어를 이해하기도 쉬워요. 이것만으로도 값어치를 해요.

@austinakon

이 앱이 정말 좋아요. 며칠 써 봤는데 듣는 걸 멈출 수가 없어요. 시작하기에 이보다 좋을 수 없어요.

@jcrules328

정말 마음에 들어요. 한 달 정도 써 봤는데 숨은 보석을 찾은 기분이에요. BeFreed로 제가 원하는 주제를 직접 만들 수 있어서 좋고, 목소리도 훌륭한 데다 내레이션 선택지가 무궁무진해요.

@DanielCZ

정말이지 아직 앱을 다 써 보지도 않았는데, 며칠 써 본 것만으로도 깊은 인상을 받았어요… BeFreed는 제가 써 본 어떤 학습 앱과도 차원이 달라요. 몰입감이 엄청나고 집중력도 실제로 좋아져서, 스마트폰을 하염없이 스크롤하는 분들께 딱이에요!

@ladyInfinity

정확히 23일 전에 BeFreed를 구입했는데, 그날부터 하루도 빠짐없이 쓰고 있어요. 제 일상 업무 흐름과 학습 습관에 완전히 자리 잡았어요.

@jayallen

솔직히 이 앱은 제 기대를 전부 뛰어넘었어요. 어떤 주제든 오디오로 만들어 달라고 할 수 있고, 결과물이 놀라워요. 제 전문 분야는 심리치료 쪽이고 여러 학문이 얽혀 있는데도 답변이 아주 정확해요.

@Raguipa

제일 고마운 건 스크롤하는 시간이 확 줄었다는 거예요. 검색하는 시간은 줄고 흡수하는 시간은 늘었어요. 오디오북 전권, 팟캐스트, 학습 플랜의 조합이 정말 훌륭해요.

@colonyofcreatorsNGO

저는 24년째 PhotoReading 속진 학습 강사로 일하고 있어요… 책과 독서, 배움이 제 전문인데, BeFreed는 정보를 소화하기 쉽게 전달하는 혁신적인 방식을 정말 잘 구현했어요.

@BeFreed user

단순한 책 요약 앱이 아니에요. '재미' 스타일을 써 봤는데, 전통적인 방식보다 훨씬 나은 요약이고 아이디어를 이해하기도 쉬워요. 이것만으로도 값어치를 해요.

@austinakon

이 앱이 정말 좋아요. 며칠 써 봤는데 듣는 걸 멈출 수가 없어요. 시작하기에 이보다 좋을 수 없어요.

@jcrules328

정말 마음에 들어요. 한 달 정도 써 봤는데 숨은 보석을 찾은 기분이에요. BeFreed로 제가 원하는 주제를 직접 만들 수 있어서 좋고, 목소리도 훌륭한 데다 내레이션 선택지가 무궁무진해요.

@DanielCZ

유용한 정보와 아이디어를 8~15분짜리 팟캐스트 스타일 오디오로 압축해서 들을 수 있다는 게 정말 좋아요. 원래 팟캐스트는 군더더기가 많아서 안 좋아했는데, 여기는 그걸 싹 걷어냈어요.

@BeFreed user

박사 과정을 마무리하는 중이라 낯선 자료를 많이 읽어야 해요… BeFreed에서는 프롬프트만 입력하면 앱이 자료를 찾아서 오디오 팟캐스트로 만들어 줘요. BeFreed의 과정이 NotebookLM보다 더 매끄럽게 느껴져요.

@Brad

아침을 준비하거나 산책하거나 출퇴근할 때 들을 것을 YouTube에서 자주 찾곤 했는데, BeFreed는 광고도 군더더기도 없이 훨씬 더 딱 맞는 걸 들려줘요!

@BeFreed user

이 플랫폼의 가장 큰 장점은 활용도예요. 다루지 못하는 주제가 말 그대로 하나도 없어요. 무엇을 던져도 다 소화해요… 제한이 전혀 없으면서 약속을 실제로 지키는 학습 도구는 정말 드물어요.

@jayallen

BeFreed는 환상적이에요. 디자인이 편해서 헤매는 시간은 줄고 배우는 시간은 늘었어요. 오디오북, 팟캐스트, 학습 플랜의 조합은 천재적이에요. 제 하루가 완전히 달라졌어요.

@BeFreed user

처음엔 이탈리아어로 팟캐스트를 만드는 방법을 이해하는 데 시간이 좀 걸렸는데, 알고 나니까 — 와! 정말 대단해요! 어떤 주제든 설명해 달라고 하면 정말 똑똑하게 잘 설명해 줘요!

@matteo77

BeFreed는 제가 매일 쓰는 오디오북 앱이 됐어요… 제일 마음에 드는 건 텍스트를 넣으면 이동 중에도 들을 수 있는 오디오로 만들어 준다는 점이에요.

@kotanzu1

유용한 정보와 아이디어를 8~15분짜리 팟캐스트 스타일 오디오로 압축해서 들을 수 있다는 게 정말 좋아요. 원래 팟캐스트는 군더더기가 많아서 안 좋아했는데, 여기는 그걸 싹 걷어냈어요.

@BeFreed user

박사 과정을 마무리하는 중이라 낯선 자료를 많이 읽어야 해요… BeFreed에서는 프롬프트만 입력하면 앱이 자료를 찾아서 오디오 팟캐스트로 만들어 줘요. BeFreed의 과정이 NotebookLM보다 더 매끄럽게 느껴져요.

@Brad

아침을 준비하거나 산책하거나 출퇴근할 때 들을 것을 YouTube에서 자주 찾곤 했는데, BeFreed는 광고도 군더더기도 없이 훨씬 더 딱 맞는 걸 들려줘요!

@BeFreed user

이 플랫폼의 가장 큰 장점은 활용도예요. 다루지 못하는 주제가 말 그대로 하나도 없어요. 무엇을 던져도 다 소화해요… 제한이 전혀 없으면서 약속을 실제로 지키는 학습 도구는 정말 드물어요.

@jayallen

BeFreed는 환상적이에요. 디자인이 편해서 헤매는 시간은 줄고 배우는 시간은 늘었어요. 오디오북, 팟캐스트, 학습 플랜의 조합은 천재적이에요. 제 하루가 완전히 달라졌어요.

@BeFreed user

처음엔 이탈리아어로 팟캐스트를 만드는 방법을 이해하는 데 시간이 좀 걸렸는데, 알고 나니까 — 와! 정말 대단해요! 어떤 주제든 설명해 달라고 하면 정말 똑똑하게 잘 설명해 줘요!

@matteo77

BeFreed는 제가 매일 쓰는 오디오북 앱이 됐어요… 제일 마음에 드는 건 텍스트를 넣으면 이동 중에도 들을 수 있는 오디오로 만들어 준다는 점이에요.

@kotanzu1

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

지금 바로 학습 여정을 시작하세요

5장

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약 개요

다양한 학습 방식으로 두 번째 기회는 없다 요약 살펴보기

When Failing Becomes a Masterclass in Success

The Failure Landscape: Not All Failures Are Created Equal

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Psychology of Failure: Why We're Wired to Fail at Failing

Situation Awareness: Matching Your Approach to Context

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

System Awareness: Seeing Beyond Individual Parts

Mastering the Science of Failing Well

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Creating a Culture Where Failure Fuels Success

The Transformative Power of Intelligent Failure

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Embracing Our Fallibility as the Path to Excellence

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약 완독을 축하합니다

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약의 핵심 주제

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약의 명문장

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약의 등장인물

저자 소개

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약 다운로드

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약에 관한 자주 묻는 질문

What is Right Kind of Wrong by Amy Edmondson about?

Who should read Right Kind of Wrong?

Is Right Kind of Wrong worth reading?

What are the main concepts in Right Kind of Wrong?

더 알아보기

BeFreed는 호기심 넘치는 글로벌 커뮤니티를 하나로 연결합니다

다양한 학습 방식으로 두 번째 기회는 없다 요약 살펴보기

When Failing Becomes a Masterclass in Success

The Failure Landscape: Not All Failures Are Created Equal

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Psychology of Failure: Why We're Wired to Fail at Failing

Situation Awareness: Matching Your Approach to Context

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

System Awareness: Seeing Beyond Individual Parts

Mastering the Science of Failing Well

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Creating a Culture Where Failure Fuels Success

The Transformative Power of Intelligent Failure

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Embracing Our Fallibility as the Path to Excellence

두 번째 기회는 없다 요약 완독을 축하합니다

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

더 알아보기