What is *Collaborating with the Enemy* by Adam Kahane about?

*Collaborating with the Enemy* explores strategies for working effectively with adversaries in complex, polarized situations. It challenges the myth that collaboration requires agreement, offering frameworks like "stretch collaboration" to transform conflict into productive partnerships. The book draws on real-world examples, including peace processes in South Africa and Colombia, to illustrate how to navigate mistrust and systemic challenges.

Who should read *Collaborating with the Enemy*?

Leaders, negotiators, and professionals facing entrenched conflicts or cross-sector collaboration challenges will find this book invaluable. It’s particularly relevant for those in politics, organizational development, or community-building roles seeking practical tools to work with opposing groups without compromising core values.

Is *Collaborating with the Enemy* worth reading?

Yes, for its actionable insights on turning adversarial relationships into opportunities. Kahane’s blend of theory and real-case studies—like Guatemala’s post-civil war efforts—provides a roadmap for navigating today’s polarized environments. Critics praise its pragmatic approach to complex collaboration beyond superficial consensus.

What is the "enemyfying syndrome" in *Collaborating with the Enemy*?

Enemyfying refers to labeling others as adversaries, oversimplifying conflicts into "us vs. them." This mindset escalates tension and stifles problem-solving. Kahane argues overcoming it requires embracing both conflict and connection, focusing on shared goals rather than differences.

How does *Collaborating with the Enemy* define "stretch collaboration"?

Stretch collaboration rejects rigid control, advocating for iterative experimentation amid discord. It combines three shifts: embracing conflict (not avoiding it), testing solutions through action (not over-planning), and engaging fully without domination. This approach is exemplified in Kahane’s work on drug policy reform in the Americas.

What are the four options for dealing with difficult collaborators?

Kahane outlines four choices: - **Forcing**: Imposing your solution. - **Adapting**: Accepting others’ terms. - **Exiting**: Withdrawing from the situation. - **Collaborating**: Co-creating mutually acceptable paths. The book argues collaboration becomes viable when we abandon illusions of control.

How does *Collaborating with the Enemy* apply to workplace conflicts?

The book advises reframing workplace tensions as shared challenges rather than personal battles. For example, teams can use "stretch" techniques like rotating leadership roles or prototyping solutions incrementally—methods Kahane tested in corporate and NGO settings.

What real-world examples support *Collaborating with the Enemy*'s theories?

Key cases include: - **South Africa’s post-apartheid reconciliation**: Facilitating dialogue between former enemies. - **Colombian peace talks**: Integrating guerrilla groups into governance. - **Guatemala’s post-war recovery**: Rebuilding trust through grassroots collaboration.

적과의 협력

동의하지 않거나, 좋아하지 않거나, 신뢰하지 않는 사람들과 함께 일하는 법

아담 카헤인

3.22(2234 Reviews)

적과의 협력 개요

적들이 가득한 세상에서, 아담 카헤인(Adam Kahane)은 갈등을 포용하는 급진적인 접근 방식인 "스트레치 협업(stretch collaboration)"을 제안합니다. 넬슨 만델라가 지지하고 다보스 포럼에서 찬사를 받은 이 프레임워크는 전 세계 수천 개의 연합체를 변화시켰습니다. 신뢰하지 않는 사람들과도 협업할 수 있을까요? 이 책이 그 방법을 보여줍니다.

전달 방식을 선택하세요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

적과의 협력의 같은 아이디어를 담았습니다. 나에게 맞는 목소리, 깊이, 속도를 고르고 언제든 바꿔 보세요.

1장

When Enemies Must Work Together: The Radical Art of Stretch Collaboration

In a world increasingly divided by ideology, politics, and values, Adam Kahane's "Collaborating with the Enemy" arrives as a timely antidote to our polarized discourse. This groundbreaking work has been compared to classics like Sun Tzu's "The Art of War" and Machiavelli's "The Prince" for its practical wisdom on navigating human conflict. Drawing from his twenty-five years facilitating high-stakes collaborations across the globe-from South Africa's transition from apartheid to Colombia's peace process-Kahane challenges our fundamental assumptions about how to work with those we don't agree with, like, or trust. The book has developed a cult following among leaders across sectors, with former Colombian President and Nobel Peace Prize winner Juan Manuel Santos crediting Kahane's work as "one of the most significant events in the country's search for peace." What makes this book particularly remarkable is how it transforms the seemingly impossible-working productively with enemies-into a learnable skill set that applies equally to international conflicts, corporate boardrooms, and family dinner tables.

2장

The Collaboration Paradox: More Necessary Yet More Difficult

We face an increasing paradox in our complex, interconnected world: collaboration is becoming simultaneously more essential and more challenging. The more we need to work together, the harder it becomes-especially with those we consider opponents. This dynamic plays out across sectors, from global climate negotiations to local community projects, where interdependence demands cooperation even as differences intensify. This paradox manifests in what Kahane calls the "enemyfying syndrome"-our tendency to treat others as the cause of our problems. We differentiate ourselves from "those people," seeing them as opponents or enemies. This syndrome creates self-perpetuating cycles of fear and blame that pervade politics, workplaces, and even family life. For example, in corporate mergers, departments often view other units as threats rather than partners, while in environmental disputes, activists and industry representatives frequently demonize each other instead of seeking common ground. While enemyfying simplifies complex realities into black and white categories, making it easier to mobilize action, it ultimately obscures challenges, amplifies conflicts, narrows problem-solving possibilities, and distracts us with unrealizable dreams of decisive victory. Consider how political discourse increasingly frames issues as zero-sum battles between good and evil, making compromise seem like betrayal rather than progress. The central challenge of collaboration lies in its dual meaning: "to work jointly with" but also "to cooperate traitorously with the enemy." We must work with others to move forward, yet worry about betraying our principles when working with those we disagree with. This challenge grows more acute as people become increasingly individualistic, diverse, and vocal, with fluid identities and affiliations. Social media amplifies these divisions, creating echo chambers that reinforce our biases and deepen mistrust of others. As hierarchies break down and complexity increases, we increasingly need to work with opponents-yet find it increasingly difficult. This collaborative challenge emerges from declining authoritarianism (a positive development) but risks producing fragmentation and polarization (a negative outcome) if we fail to meet it effectively. Kahane's personal experiences highlight this challenge. During a workshop with 33 national leaders addressing their country's critical problems, when some organizers criticized his facilitation behind his back, he became defensive and mistrustful-ironically reproducing the same dynamics of mistrust and fragmentation that the larger project aimed to address. This small conflict revealed how easily we can fall into the enemyfying trap, even when our explicit goal is collaboration. Similar patterns emerge in international peace negotiations, where facilitators must navigate complex webs of historical grievances and competing interests while maintaining their own objectivity. The paradox becomes particularly evident in crisis situations, where the need for swift, coordinated action often collides with deep-seated divisions and mistrust. Whether addressing global pandemics, climate change, or economic inequality, the very urgency that demands collaboration often intensifies the forces that make it difficult. Understanding this paradox is the first step toward developing more effective approaches to working across differences.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

적과의 협력의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

3장

Beyond the Collaboration Default: Four Response Options

Despite our increasing interconnectedness in the modern world, collaboration isn't always the optimal response when facing problematic situations. Leaders and organizations need to develop a nuanced understanding of when to collaborate, not just how to do it effectively. This requires careful assessment of context, power dynamics, and potential outcomes. When facing challenging situations-whether in politics, business, or personal life-we have four fundamental response options: collaborating, forcing, adapting, or exiting. Each serves different purposes and comes with distinct advantages and risks. We typically pursue collaboration when we want to create change but recognize we can't achieve it alone. While collaboration often produces more effective and sustainable solutions with broader stakeholder buy-in, it also carries significant risks: the process can be frustratingly slow, require uncomfortable compromises, or dilute essential principles and values. Forcing becomes viable when we possess sufficient power and believe we know the best course of action. This might involve using authority, resources, or influence to implement changes unilaterally. While forcing can achieve quick results, it frequently generates resistance and resentment, potentially undermining long-term success. Adapting involves finding creative ways to function within constraints we cannot change, requiring resilience and flexibility. Exiting-whether from a relationship, organization, or situation-represents a clean break when other options prove unfeasible. Kahane illustrates these dynamics through his extensive work with Thai leaders during political unrest in 2010. The team identified three distinct approaches to their country's challenges: We Adapt (individuals focus on personal welfare while deferring larger issues to authorities), We Force (pushing for top-down solutions through political movements and protests), and We Collaborate (developing cross-factional, bottom-up solutions). Though initial consensus favored collaboration for addressing Thailand's complex challenges, many participants reverted to forcing or adapting as tensions escalated, ultimately leading to a military coup in 2014. This case demonstrates how crisis conditions can strain collaborative commitments. Successful collaboration requires mutual recognition of interdependence and shared interest in joint problem-solving. Sometimes this means waiting patiently for others' collaboration readiness to increase or actively working to make collaborative approaches more attractive. The Mont Fleur Scenario Exercise in South Africa (1991) showcases collaboration's transformative potential when diverse leaders from across the deeply divided society worked together to envision and support South Africa's transition from apartheid. However, Kahane's subsequent experiences revealed numerous situations where collaboration proved suboptimal or impossible-from companies protecting competitive advantages to governments deliberately avoiding engagement with opposition groups for strategic reasons. Understanding these response options helps leaders make more informed choices about when to pursue collaboration versus alternative approaches. The key lies in recognizing that while collaboration often produces superior outcomes, it isn't universally applicable or always the most effective response to complex challenges.

4장

The Fatal Flaw in Conventional Collaboration

Our default collaboration mode assumes control, but this approach simply doesn't work in complex, contentious situations. Conventional collaboration follows a three-step model: smart people analyze the problem and solution, get approval from authorities, and have subordinates execute the plan. This rationalist approach assumes "there is one best solution" that strategists must identify before addressing implementation. Kahane's physics-trained approach proved fundamentally unsuited for "wicked problems" where there is no undisputable public good or objective definition of equity. The starting assumption that "there is one right answer" leaves no room for others' perspectives, creating dangerous certainty. As Kahane observed in Thailand, every leader claimed to know "the truth" about their political crisis. We cling to being right to protect our identity-what German psychologist Anja Koehne calls "feeling superior as a condition of being." This reveals why conventional collaboration fails in complex situations: it cannot accommodate multiple truths or perspectives. When hospital CEO Susan Jones launched a collaborative transformation project, she made three critical mistakes: First, she focused only on "the good of the whole," papering over different departmental perspectives and ignoring that only her interests fully aligned with the institution's. Second, she pushed for a single problem statement and solution in a complex situation where no one truly knew what would work without experimentation. Third, she assumed a hierarchical model where higher-level people change lower-level people, making everyone defensive. The transformation ultimately failed, with staff responding with cynicism and resistance. Similarly, when parents John and Mary tried to help their financially troubled son Bob with a directive approach-offering a narrow compromise with clear boundaries-their controlled collaboration failed because it didn't address underlying issues. Their constricted approach prevented genuine progress and left everyone more frustrated than before. Collaboration cannot require agreeing on a single truth but must find ways to move forward beyond such agreements-just as successful marriages establish dialogue about perpetual problems rather than solving them. Conventional collaboration is becoming obsolete as complexity increases and control decreases.

적과의 협력에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

5장

Stretch Collaboration: Embracing the Uncomfortable

Stretch collaboration offers an alternative approach by abandoning the illusion of control. While conventional collaboration assumes we can control the focus, goal, plan, and each person's role (like a team following a road map), stretch collaboration offers a way forward without being in control (like multiple teams rafting a river). This approach acknowledges that in complex situations, no single person or group can fully control or predict the outcome. It requires stretching in three dimensions, each uncomfortable but essential for collaborating in complex situations: 1. Embracing both conflict and connection when team members have different perspectives and interests. This means maintaining relationships while actively engaging with disagreements rather than avoiding them. For instance, in workplace settings, team members might openly discuss conflicting priorities while affirming their shared commitment to organizational success. 2. Experimenting with multiple possibilities to discover what works step by step. Instead of trying to plan everything in advance, teams test various approaches simultaneously. This might involve running several pilot projects, gathering feedback, and adjusting course based on real-world results rather than theoretical planning. 3. Stepping fully into the situation and being open to changing ourselves. This requires participants to acknowledge that they are part of the system they're trying to change, not external observers. Leaders must be willing to examine and modify their own behaviors and assumptions. When John and Mary deal with their son Bob's mortgage payment troubles using stretch collaboration, they acknowledge their loving connection while openly discussing their different perspectives. Though they don't agree on the problem or solution, they try modest new actions: John guarantees a bank loan, Mary helps Bob's wife find work, and they spend more time together as a family. Each person also focuses on changing their own behavior rather than trying to control others. John examines his tendency to solve problems with money alone, while Mary reflects on her habit of offering unsolicited advice. The approach proves particularly valuable in complex organizational settings. For example, when multiple departments face conflicting priorities, stretch collaboration allows them to maintain productive relationships while acknowledging and working through their differences. A manufacturing team might disagree with marketing about product features, but instead of forcing consensus, they might run small-scale tests of different approaches while maintaining open dialogue. Though uncomfortable, this stretching toward greater conflict and connection offers more hope than conventional approaches. As Kahane notes, "For most people, stretch collaboration is unfamiliar and uncomfortable"-but increasingly essential in our complex world. The discomfort often comes from three sources: the need to hold opposing ideas simultaneously, the uncertainty of not having a fixed plan, and the vulnerability of personal change. However, this discomfort is precisely what makes the approach effective in dealing with complex challenges that resist simple solutions. Success in stretch collaboration isn't measured by achieving perfect harmony or complete resolution, but by developing more nuanced and effective ways of working together through difficulty. Organizations that embrace this approach often find they can address challenges that seemed intractable under conventional collaborative methods.

6장

The First Stretch: Embracing Conflict and Connection

In conventional collaboration, we focus on working harmoniously to achieve what's best for the whole team. This works in simple, controlled situations where perspectives and interests align. But in complex, uncontrolled situations where perspectives and interests conflict, we need to work with both our conflicts and our connections-to fight as well as talk. Kahane's experience in Guatemala initially epitomized his belief that connecting through dialogue was the key to collaboration. Ten years later, activist Clara Arenas explained why she and colleagues had publicly refused to participate in further dialogues-the government expected them to abandon strikes and protests while dialoguing, effectively disarming their primary means of achieving objectives. This tension stayed with Kahane until three experiences shifted his understanding: environmentalist David Suzuki refusing to engage with oil executives without prior agreement on fundamental principles; reflections on Nelson Mandela's legacy revealing how Mandela strategically employed both dialogue and confrontation; and Thailand's military coup attempting to impose collaboration by suppressing dissent. These experiences revealed that true collaboration requires both engaging harmoniously and asserting forcefully-suppressing either suffocates the social system. The key insight is that social systems consist of multiple overlapping "holons"-entities that are simultaneously wholes and parts of larger wholes. A person is a whole within a team, which is a whole within an organization, and so on. Each has distinct needs and interests. Claiming to focus on "the good of the whole" is misleading-it really means prioritizing whichever whole matters most to the speaker. Every holon has two essential drives: power and love. Following theologian Paul Tillich, Kahane defines power as "the drive of everything living to realize itself," manifested through asserting, differentiation, and individuation. Love is "the drive towards the unity of the separated," manifested through engaging, homogenization, and integration. As Martin Luther King Jr. said, "Power without love is reckless and abusive, and love without power is sentimental and anemic." Using psychologist Barry Johnson's polarity mapping, Kahane explains that power and love function like inhaling and exhaling-we need both alternately, not simultaneously. When collaborating, we must cycle between engaging (love) and asserting (power). Most people default to their comfort zone (either love or power) under stress, often weakening their stronger drive or outsourcing their weaker one. As former Alcan CEO David Culver said: "When I feel myself wanting to be compassionate, I try to be tough, and when I feel myself wanting to be tough, I try to be compassionate." The key is noticing feedback that signals imbalance and making the corresponding rebalancing move.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

적과의 협력의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

7장

The Second Stretch: Experimenting a Way Forward

In conventional collaboration, we move forward by agreeing on the problem, solution, and implementation plan. This works in simple, controlled situations, but complex scenarios require experimentation: taking steps, observing results, and adjusting accordingly. We cannot control the future, but we can influence it. Kahane describes how a drug policy project required abandoning control. His team assembled 46 diverse leaders from across the Americas, focusing on what could happen rather than what should happen-a crucial framing that shifted entrenched positions toward creative possibility. Despite tensions between government officials and reformers, the carefully structured process allowed the team to work freely and democratically, producing an unprecedented report discussing radical alternatives to the war on drugs. The project didn't solve the drug problem but created new narratives and relationships that helped unstick a system frozen for forty years. Kahane realized that influencing situations we cannot control requires giving up control itself. The team made progress precisely because they stopped trying to force agreement on either problems or solutions. In stretch collaboration, we discover our path forward rather than knowing it in advance-a process both exciting and unnerving. As Deng Xiaoping captured when describing China's economic transition: "We are crossing the river by feeling for stones." This principle appears in Karl Weick's story of lost soldiers who found their way using the wrong map-demonstrating that teams progress not through perfect planning but through action, learning, and mutual support. The creative process demands what poet John Keats called "negative capability"-being comfortable with "uncertainties, mysteries, and doubts without any irritable reaching after fact and reason." Stretch collaboration is daunting precisely because it demands this patient experimentation not privately, but publicly with opponents on issues that matter deeply. Open listening is the essential practice for experimenting a way forward. It enables discovering options not yet apparent by cultivating fresh noticing-what Zen master Shunryu Suzuki calls "beginner's mind," where possibilities abound compared to the expert's few. The Vision Guatemala team demonstrated how shifting listening patterns can transform collaboration, progressing through Otto Scharmer's four modes of listening: downloading (listening only from within one's own story), debating (listening objectively to judge correctness), dialoguing (listening empathetically from inside others), and presencing (listening from the whole system). All four modes are legitimate, but if we remain stuck in downloading and debating, we merely reenact existing realities. Creating new possibilities requires dialoguing and presencing.

8장

The Third Stretch: Stepping Into the Game

The third stretch demands moving from sidelines into direct engagement, requiring a fundamental shift in how we approach collaborative challenges. In conventional collaboration, we focus on changing what others are doing, which works in controlled situations like managing a team project or organizing an event. But in complex scenarios - whether addressing climate change, resolving community conflicts, or transforming organizational culture - we must shift focus to our own contributions and behaviors. When faced with challenging situations, we habitually focus on what others should be doing rather than examining our own role. This manifests in common phrases like "If only they would..." or "They need to understand that..." After experiencing rejection in a project, Kahane stewed in humiliation for months until encountering Martin Buber's wisdom: focusing on what others should do rather than beginning with ourselves contains a "fundamental error." This pattern of blaming others-asking "How can we get them to...?"-reveals a hierarchical mindset that separates us into heroes and villains, making genuine collaboration impossible. We can relate to situations either as directors/spectators (apart from and above the action) or as cocreators (part of the situation). Directors view themselves as external problem-solvers, while cocreators recognize their embeddedness in the system they're trying to change. In stretch collaboration, we must see ourselves as cocreators. As Bill Torbert notes, "If you are not part of the problem, then you cannot be part of the solution." This requires a profound shift in perspective - seeing ourselves as "part of" rather than "apart from" the situation-like saying "I am traffic" rather than "I am in traffic." This shift applies equally to environmental issues, social conflicts, and organizational challenges. This means fully engaging with the risk of being changed or hurt-being like the pig in a ham omelet (committed) rather than the chicken (merely involved). True engagement requires vulnerability and the willingness to be transformed by the collaborative process. The transformative moment in collaboration comes when participants realize they themselves-not just others-must change. This might mean acknowledging unconscious biases, questioning long-held assumptions, or adapting cherished ways of working. When we blame others, we feel unhappy and helpless; when we commit to what we can do, we become alert and energetic. This shift from blame to responsibility creates momentum and opens new possibilities for action. The essential practice is attending to ourselves-whenever we notice ourselves blaming others, we must return to the simple question: what must we do next? This requires developing new habits of self-reflection and personal accountability, regularly asking questions like "How am I contributing to this situation?" and "What can I change about my approach?" Success in stretch collaboration depends on this willingness to step fully into the game, accepting both the risks and responsibilities of being an active participant rather than a distant observer. This might mean initiating difficult conversations, acknowledging mistakes, or being the first to model the change we seek in others.

적과의 협력에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

9장

Learning to Stretch: The Path to Mastery

Learning these unfamiliar behaviors requires practice, curiosity, openness, and self-reflection. The primary obstacle is overcoming the comfort of habitual patterns, requiring you to loosen attachment to fixed positions and identities. The way forward isn't about perfection but about developing awareness of your actions and their impacts, enabling quicker adaptation and learning. Moving from unconscious incompetence to conscious incompetence to conscious competence to unconscious competence requires loosening attachment to opinions, positions, and identities. This shift from declarative ("It must be this way") to subjunctive ("It could be this way") thinking can feel both frightening and liberating. As tai chi teacher Wolfe Lowenthal notes about push hands practice, our inability to deal gently with opponents reveals our own stuckness, and the real progress comes from confronting ourselves. Counterintuitively, those we consider enemies can become our greatest teachers by forcing us to pause and find new approaches when they don't conform to our expectations. Paradoxically, your enemies can be your greatest teachers, as they force you to find fresh ways forward when others don't do what you want. The Colombian peace process illustrates this principle dramatically. In 1996, Juan Manuel Santos visited South Africa and learned about Mont Fleur from Nelson Mandela. This led to the Destino Colombia project, bringing together forty-two representatives of Colombia's violent conflict. Despite initial fear and mistrust, the process enabled unprecedented dialogue. One evening, communist leader Jaime Caicedo, paramilitary commander Ivan Duque, and retired general Juan Salcedo stayed up late talking and playing guitar together-a connection that later saved Caicedo's life when Duque convinced his boss to call off an assassination. Santos, who became president in 2010 and won the Nobel Peace Prize for negotiating peace with the FARC in 2016, credited this early collaboration as "one of the most significant events in the country's search for peace." The project demonstrated that people with contradictory positions could find ways to work together-not by ignoring their differences or forcing agreement, but by stretching beyond conventional collaboration to embrace conflict and connection, experiment their way forward, and step fully into the game. In our increasingly divided world, this approach offers not just a methodology but a mindset-one that acknowledges the messy reality of human differences while providing practical tools for making progress despite them. As Kahane reminds us, the question isn't whether we can eliminate conflict, but whether we can learn to collaborate effectively even with those we consider enemies. The answer, his work suggests, is a challenging but hopeful yes.

★★★★★

적과의 협력 완독을 축하합니다

100만 명 이상의 학습자가 사랑합니다

“23일째 매일 사용하고 있어요. 이제 제 일상의 한 부분이 되었습니다.”

jayallen

적과의 협력의 핵심 주제

stretch collaboration
conflict resolution
navigating polarization
adversarial cooperation
strategic compromise

적과의 협력의 명언

We differentiate ourselves from 'those people'.
Collaboration is becoming more essential and more challenging.
Social media amplifies divisions.
Compromise seem like betrayal rather than progress.
Collaboration isn't always the optimal response.

적과의 협력의 등장인물

Adam KahaneAuthor and facilitator of high-stakes conflict
Juan Manuel SantosFormer Colombian President and Nobel Peace Prize

저자 소개

『적과의 협력: 동의하지도, 좋아하지도, 믿지도 않는 사람들과 함께 일하는 법』(Collaborating with the Enemy: How to Work with People You Don’t Agree with or Like or Trust)의 저자인 아담 카헤인(Adam Kahane)은 갈등 해결 및 협력적 문제 해결 분야에서 세계적으로 인정받는 전문가입니다. 리오스 파트너스(Reos Partners)의 이사인 카헤인은 지난 30년 동안 기업, 정부, 시민 사회의 리더들이 복잡한 과제를 해결할 수 있도록 혁신적인 프로세스를 설계해 왔습니다. 그의 활동은 50개국 이상에 걸쳐 있으며, 경영진, 활동가, 정치인, 풀뿌리 조직가들 사이의 대화를 촉진해 왔습니다.

리더십, 협상, 시스템 변화에 뿌리를 둔 이 책은 쉘(Shell)에서의 물리학, 경제학, 시나리오 플래닝 배경을 바탕으로 격차를 해소하는 카헤인의 전문성을 반영하고 있습니다. 넬슨 만델라가 추천한 『복잡한 문제 해결하기』(Solving Tough Problems)와 『변혁적 시나리오 플래닝』(Transformative Scenario Planning)을 포함한 그의 다른 영향력 있는 저서들도 대화와 시스템적 변혁이라는 유사한 주제를 탐구합니다. 카헤인의 방법론은 유수 MBA 과정에서 교육되고 있으며 유엔(UN)과 같은 국제기구에서도 적용되고 있습니다.

캐나다 훈장(Member of the Order of Canada) 수훈자인 그의 저서들은 20개 언어로 번역되어 그 글로벌한 관련성을 입증하고 있습니다. 그의 최신작인 『시스템 변혁을 위한 일상의 습관』(Everyday Habits for Transforming Systems, 2025)은 실천적이고 대규모적인 변화 전략의 선구자로서 그의 유산을 더욱 공고히 하고 있습니다.

적과의 협력 요약 다운로드

적과의 협력 요약을 무료 PDF 또는 EPUB으로 받으세요. 인쇄하거나 오프라인에서 언제든 읽을 수 있습니다.

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

Facilitating Breakthrough

Adam Kahane

Becoming Brave Together

Chris Deaver & Ian Clawson

Possible

William Ury

Collaborative Intelligence: Thinking with People Who Think Differently

Dawna Markova

Radical Collaboration, 2nd Edition

James Tamm

Getting Along

Amy Gallo

Choose Your Enemies Wisely

Patrick Bet-David

Leading Without Authority

Keith Ferrazzi & Noel Weyrich

이 책에 대한 FAQ

더 알아보기

학습 계획

Conflict management

Conflict is inevitable in any workplace or relationship, but how you handle it determines whether it becomes destructive or productive. This learning plan equips professionals, managers, and anyone who deals with challenging interpersonal dynamics with the skills to transform conflicts into opportunities for growth and collaboration.

4 h 40 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Hidden Language of Trust

In an era of digital disconnect, mastering the nuances of human behavior is essential for effective leadership and conflict resolution. This plan is designed for professionals and negotiators who need to read between the lines and build psychological safety in high-stakes environments.

2 h 18 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Lead with Radical Candor

In today's fast-paced work environment, leaders often struggle to balance directness with empathy. This plan is designed for managers and aspiring leaders who need to drive performance through honest communication while building deep, lasting rapport with their teams.

1 h 12 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Merge CIA Operator & Nassim Taleb Thinking

This plan bridges the gap between elite field intelligence and modern philosophical risk management. It is designed for leaders and strategists who must navigate unpredictable, high-stakes environments where traditional analysis is insufficient.

6 h 31 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Lead Through Friction

In high-pressure environments, the ability to manage conflict and negotiate effectively is a critical differentiator for success. This plan is designed for emerging and established leaders who need to transform workplace friction into productive, trust-based collaboration.

47 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Negotiating

Effective negotiation is a critical skill for leaders and professionals looking to drive value and resolve conflict. This plan is ideal for anyone seeking to move beyond basic bargaining into advanced psychological mastery and strategic deal-making.

5 h 38 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Strategist's Toolkit for Human Dynamics

In high-stakes environments, understanding the hidden layers of human behavior is a critical survival skill. This plan is designed for leaders and professionals who need to identify predatory tactics and apply strategic decision-making to win in competitive social landscapes.

1 h 45 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

The Art of Conversational Competence

In an era where communication defines professional success, mastering the nuances of human interaction is essential. This plan is designed for leaders and professionals who need to navigate high-stakes conflicts and persuade diverse audiences with poise.

2 h•4 섹션

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

지금 바로 학습 여정을 시작하세요

5장

적과의 협력

개요적과의 협력 개요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

When Enemies Must Work Together: The Radical Art of Stretch Collaboration

The Collaboration Paradox: More Necessary Yet More Difficult

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Beyond the Collaboration Default: Four Response Options

The Fatal Flaw in Conventional Collaboration

적과의 협력에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Stretch Collaboration: Embracing the Uncomfortable

The First Stretch: Embracing Conflict and Connection

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Second Stretch: Experimenting a Way Forward

The Third Stretch: Stepping Into the Game

적과의 협력에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Learning to Stretch: The Path to Mastery

적과의 협력 완독을 축하합니다

적과의 협력의 핵심 주제

적과의 협력의 명언

적과의 협력의 등장인물

저자 소개

적과의 협력 요약 다운로드

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

이 책에 대한 FAQ

What is Collaborating with the Enemy by Adam Kahane about?

Who should read Collaborating with the Enemy?

Is Collaborating with the Enemy worth reading?

What is the "enemyfying syndrome" in Collaborating with the Enemy?

더 알아보기

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

When Enemies Must Work Together: The Radical Art of Stretch Collaboration

The Collaboration Paradox: More Necessary Yet More Difficult

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Beyond the Collaboration Default: Four Response Options

The Fatal Flaw in Conventional Collaboration

적과의 협력에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Stretch Collaboration: Embracing the Uncomfortable

The First Stretch: Embracing Conflict and Connection

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Second Stretch: Experimenting a Way Forward

The Third Stretch: Stepping Into the Game

적과의 협력에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Learning to Stretch: The Path to Mastery

적과의 협력 완독을 축하합니다

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

더 알아보기

적과의 협력 개요