What is How Learning Works by Susan A. Ambrose about?

How Learning Works by Susan A. Ambrose presents seven research-based principles that explain how students learn and how educators can apply these insights to improve teaching effectiveness. The book bridges cognitive science research with practical classroom strategies, addressing common teaching challenges like why students struggle to apply knowledge, cling to misconceptions, or use ineffective study strategies. It provides instructors with actionable approaches across all disciplines and institution types.

Who is Susan A. Ambrose and what are her credentials?

Susan A. Ambrose is a Senior Vice Provost at Northeastern University and a leading expert in teaching and learning. She co-authored How Learning Works with Michael W. Bridges, Marsha C. Lovett, Michele DiPietro, and Marie K. Norman, drawing on over twenty-nine years of consulting experience with faculty about effective instruction. Her work focuses on translating cognitive science and educational psychology research into practical teaching strategies that enhance student learning outcomes.

Who should read How Learning Works?

How Learning Works is essential for college faculty members, graduate students, instructional designers, faculty developers, and librarians seeking to improve their teaching effectiveness. The book also benefits K-12 educators and anyone involved in curriculum design or educational leadership. Whether you're a novice instructor or experienced professor, the research-based principles apply across disciplines, cultures, and educational contexts, making it valuable for educators at any experience level.

Is How Learning Works by Susan A. Ambrose worth reading?

How Learning Works is widely regarded as an essential read for educators, receiving critical acclaim since its 2010 publication. The book effectively bridges the gap between learning research and practical classroom application, offering concrete strategies rather than abstract theory. Its seven principles resonate across disciplines and cultures, from Latin America to Asia, providing instructors with evidence-based approaches that directly address common teaching challenges and enhance student learning outcomes.

What are the seven principles in How Learning Works?

The seven principles of How Learning Works address fundamental aspects of student learning: * prior knowledge can help or hinder learning * knowledge organization affects application * motivation determines learning engagement * mastery requires skill integration and practice * goal-directed practice with feedback enhances learning * course climate impacts student success * self-directed learning requires metacognitive skills Each principle is supported by cognitive science research and accompanied by specific classroom implementation strategies.

How does prior knowledge affect learning according to How Learning Works?

Prior knowledge serves as the foundation for new learning, influencing how students filter and interpret information, according to How Learning Works. When activated effectively through strategies like brainstorming, prior knowledge enhances retention and understanding by helping students connect new concepts to existing frameworks. However, inaccurate prior knowledge or misconceptions can hinder learning, requiring educators to assess students' existing understanding and address faulty assumptions before introducing new material.

What does How Learning Works say about student motivation?

How Learning Works identifies motivation as the force that determines, directs, and sustains learning behaviors. The book recommends connecting course material to students' interests, providing authentic real-world tasks that demonstrate practical application, and clearly articulating learning goals to boost confidence and engagement. Understanding what motivates students—including value, expectancy, and environment factors—helps instructors create learning experiences that energize rather than discourage student participation and persistence.

How does knowledge organization impact learning in How Learning Works?

Knowledge organization determines whether students can retrieve and apply information effectively, according to How Learning Works. The book emphasizes that students need to organize information in structured, interconnected ways rather than isolated facts to facilitate transfer and problem-solving. Instructors should provide initial organizing schemes like concept maps or frameworks, then monitor how students process information to ensure they're building meaningful connections rather than simply memorizing disconnected pieces.

学习是如何运作的

关于明智教学的七个基于研究的原则

苏珊·A·安布罗斯

4.12(1362 Reviews)

《学习是如何运作的》概述

通过《学习之道》（How Learning Works）开启卓越教学之门——这本基于研究的指南被全球教育工作者誉为“瑰宝”。作为跨越学科与文化的学术基石，它将卡内基梅隆大学数十年的专业经验浓缩为可操作的原则，从而彻底改变知识在思维之间传递的方式。

选择讲述方式

一本书，多种聆听方式。

来自《学习是如何运作的》的相同理念。选择适合你的声音、深度和节奏，随时切换。

第 1 章

The Science of Learning: Unlocking How Students Master Knowledge

Ever found yourself wondering why some students effortlessly grasp complex concepts while others struggle despite putting in hours of study? "How Learning Works" by Susan A. Ambrose and her colleagues at Carnegie Mellon University has become a cornerstone text in higher education for good reason. Endorsed by Nobel Prize winner Herbert Simon and praised by educational psychologists worldwide, this book distills decades of learning research into seven powerful principles that transform teaching effectiveness. What makes this work particularly valuable is how it bridges rigorous cognitive science with practical classroom applications-something rarely achieved in educational literature. As Oprah Winfrey once noted in her book club selection process, "When education meets accessibility, that's when real change happens." This book exemplifies that intersection, explaining why even the most brilliant professors sometimes fail to reach their students, and providing evidence-based solutions that work across disciplines.

第 2 章

The Foundation: How Prior Knowledge Shapes Learning

Imagine walking into a room where everyone is speaking a language you barely understand. That's how many students feel when encountering new course material without adequate prior knowledge. What students already know fundamentally shapes how they interpret, organize, and incorporate new information. Prior knowledge acts as both foundation and filter. When accurate and activated appropriately, it creates mental "hooks" on which new knowledge can hang. Studies show people learn facts about familiar subjects twice as efficiently as unfamiliar ones-new knowledge literally "sticks" better when it has something to stick to. This explains why a business student might grasp marketing concepts more readily than physics principles, or why a history major might excel in literature courses that reference historical contexts they already understand. However, prior knowledge can also impede learning in several ways. Sometimes students possess accurate knowledge but fail to activate it when needed. In one fascinating study, students who knew how to solve one problem couldn't apply the same solution to an analogous problem until prompted-then 80% succeeded. This demonstrates why instructors should explicitly connect new material to relevant concepts students already know. More problematically, students often bring insufficient or inaccurate knowledge to learning situations. A statistics professor might discover students claiming competence with statistical tests can't actually select appropriate ones for specific data sets. Or students might misunderstand "negative reinforcement" in psychology because their everyday association of "negative" with "bad" interferes with learning the technical definition (removing something to increase behavior). Perhaps most challenging are deeply entrenched misconceptions that resist correction. Research shows 94% of students maintained incorrect beliefs about seasonal changes even after watching an explanatory video! These misconceptions persist because they've been reinforced over time, contain accurate elements alongside inaccuracies, and often work adequately for everyday explanations. Effective instructors address these challenges by first assessing what students know through diagnostic quizzes, concept mapping activities, or analyzing error patterns. They then activate relevant knowledge through exercises that prompt students to articulate existing knowledge before introducing new material. When gaps exist, they provide appropriate remediation-from self-study materials to review sessions or course redesign. For misconceptions, they employ "bridging analogies" that start with students' accurate knowledge and gradually build toward correct understanding, as when physics instructors help students understand that tables exert force by bridging from springs to foam to wood to solid tables.

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

轻松跟读，《学习是如何运作的》中的每个词都会随音频实时高亮。

第 3 章

Knowledge Organization: The Architecture of Understanding

Have you ever wondered why experts can seemingly pluck solutions from thin air while novices struggle through methodical steps? The difference lies largely in how their knowledge is organized. Experts unconsciously maintain complex networks connecting important elements within their domains, organizing knowledge around meaningful features and abstract principles. Students, by contrast, typically haven't developed such connected ways of organizing information. This difference becomes apparent in how people approach problems. When presented with physics problems, novices organize them by surface features ("pulley problems," "inclined plane problems"), while experts categorize by underlying physical principles (conservation of energy, Newton's laws). Similarly, chess masters don't memorize more individual pieces than novices; they recognize meaningful patterns that represent strategic situations. The density of connections in knowledge structures matters tremendously. Novices typically have sparse connections among knowledge elements-either disconnected nodes or simple chain structures. Art History students might organize paintings chronologically without understanding deeper stylistic relationships, while Anatomy students might memorize body parts without grasping cross-system functional relationships. These limited organizations impede learning by making information retrieval difficult and allowing contradictory propositions to coexist unnoticed. Knowledge organization isn't merely an academic concern-it directly impacts performance. Studies show that when students are provided with organizational structures for new information, they learn 60-350% better than when left to deduce structures themselves. This dramatic improvement occurs because well-organized knowledge allows efficient access, enables processing information in meaningful chunks, and facilitates building larger knowledge networks. To help students develop more effective knowledge organizations, instructors can create concept maps that visualize relationships between ideas, analyze tasks to identify appropriate knowledge organization for specific assignments, and share the organizational structure of courses and individual lectures. Using contrasting cases helps students identify deep features rather than superficial similarities, while making connections between concepts explicit builds more flexible knowledge application. Monitoring students' knowledge organization through concept mapping exercises, sorting tasks, and patterns of mistakes reveals misconceptions that can be addressed directly. The goal isn't imposing a single "correct" organization-different organizations serve different purposes-but helping students develop rich, interconnected structures based on meaningful features that match the tasks they need to perform.

第 4 章

Motivation: The Engine That Drives Learning

Why do some students eagerly tackle challenging material while others do the minimum required? The answer lies in motivation-the personal investment in reaching desired outcomes that influences the direction, intensity, persistence, and quality of learning behaviors. Motivation requires two essential components: subjective value and expectancies for success. Value comes in multiple forms: attainment value (satisfaction from mastery), intrinsic value (enjoyment), and instrumental value (helping accomplish other goals). These sources often work in combination-a task initially done for a grade may develop intrinsic value as knowledge grows. Expectancies are equally crucial: outcome expectancies (belief that actions lead to desired outcomes) and efficacy expectancies (belief in one's capability to execute necessary actions). Students' attributions for past successes and failures strongly influence these expectancies-attributing success to ability or effort builds confidence, while attributing failure to controllable factors maintains motivation. Consider two contrasting scenarios: Professor Hill assumes students share his passion for primary sources in Continental Philosophy, while Professor Robles tries to motivate through warnings about course difficulty. Both approaches fail because they don't address both value and expectancies. Professor Hill's students don't see value in working with primary sources, while Professor Robles' warnings about difficulty undermine students' expectations for success. When students value a goal, expect success, and perceive a supportive environment, motivation is highest. Different combinations of these factors create distinct behavioral patterns ranging from rejecting to highly motivated. Understanding these dynamics allows instructors to strategically enhance student motivation. To establish value, instructors can connect material to students' interests through relevant topics, provide authentic real-world tasks that demonstrate practical applications, and explicitly show relevance to students' academic progression. Demonstrating the importance of higher-level skills to future professional lives helps students recognize the value of skills like writing and teamwork across disciplines. Building positive expectancies requires ensuring alignment between objectives, assessments, and teaching strategies, identifying appropriate challenge levels, providing early success opportunities, clearly articulating expectations, and delivering targeted feedback. Educating students about attribution patterns for success and failure helps them develop realistic expectations. Addressing both value and expectancies simultaneously can be achieved by providing flexibility and control through meaningful choices aligned with students' goals, which contributes to their sense of ownership and expectation of success. Giving students opportunities to reflect on their learning helps them identify the value of their work and develop specific strategies that leverage their strengths, bolstering expectations for future success.

从《学习是如何运作的》中收获更多

每日获取新洞见，探索 10 万+ 条课程内容
文字实时高亮，与音频同步
保存你的书库，在所有设备上随时访问

第 5 章

Mastery Development: Beyond Simple Knowledge Acquisition

What separates true mastery from mere familiarity with a subject? Tasks that seem simple to instructors often involve complex combinations of skills. Like learning to drive requires integrating numerous steps, facts, and skills, academic mastery follows a similar pattern: students must acquire component skills, practice integrating them, and know when to apply what they have learned. Expertise follows a four-stage developmental trajectory from novice to expert: "unconscious incompetence" (not knowing what they don't know), "conscious incompetence" (awareness of knowledge gaps), "conscious competence" (deliberate skill application), and finally "unconscious competence" (automatic, instinctive performance). This progression creates an "expert blind spot"-instructors struggle to break down skills, skip steps unconsciously, underestimate learning time, and overestimate students' transfer abilities. Consider Professor Solomon's Industrial Management course, where student groups underperform on team projects despite doing well individually. The professor expected group projects to exceed individual work quality because more people can share the workload and generate ideas. However, successful teamwork requires not just content knowledge but also process skills like delegating tasks, coordinating efforts, resolving conflicts, and synthesizing contributions-skills the professor assumed students already possessed. Similarly, Professor Kozol's acting students mastered fundamental movement, voice, and speech skills separately but struggled to integrate them effectively in performance. When students must combine multiple skills simultaneously, performance often degrades due to cognitive load limitations-the total information-processing demands exceed what people can manage. Experts experience less cognitive load because their highly practiced component skills become automated, requiring fewer cognitive resources. Mastery also requires knowing when and where to apply skills. Transfer-applying skills learned in one context to another-is a central educational goal yet occurs neither often nor automatically. Students struggle with transfer because they may associate knowledge too closely with the original learning context, or they may lack understanding of underlying principles-the "why" behind practices. Research shows transfer improves when students combine concrete experience with abstract principles, make structured comparisons between cases, engage in analogical reasoning, use visual representations, articulate causal relationships, and receive prompting from instructors. In one study, students who memorized a military strategy couldn't apply it to an analogous medical problem until prompted to consider the connection-showing how a little guidance can significantly improve transfer. To build mastery, instructors should systematically identify component skills by repeatedly asking "What would students need to know to achieve this task?" and decomposing complex tasks until all components are identified. Providing focused practice increases automaticity and fluency, while temporarily constraining tasks reduces cognitive load while students develop integration skills. To facilitate transfer, instructors should discuss conditions of applicability, provide diverse practice contexts, ask students to generalize to larger principles, and use structured comparisons to help identify deep features versus surface characteristics.

第 6 章

The Practice-Feedback Loop: Refining Performance Through Iteration

Not all practice is equal. Students must focus on areas needing improvement rather than what they already know, and without proper feedback, even focused practice can entrench errors. Goal-directed practice coupled with targeted feedback creates an effective learning cycle that maximizes learning efficiency. Research shows learning is best fostered when practice focuses on specific goals, targets appropriate challenge levels, and occurs with sufficient frequency. Deliberate practice-working toward specific goals-predicts continued learning better than generic practice. Expert musicians spend time monitoring performance against particular goals, then pushing toward new ones. Goals focus students' attention on relevant material and allow progress monitoring. However, instructors often fail to convey specific goals clearly to students. Professor Strait's vague criteria of "substantive anthropological arguments" carried specific meaning to her but not to her novice students, who defaulted to prior experience. Effective goals are stated as observable student behaviors that can be measured, like "explaining a concept to a particular audience" rather than vague directives like "understanding a concept." Practice must be at an appropriate challenge level-neither too hard (causing struggle and errors) nor too easy (requiring little effort). This connects to Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development, where instructional scaffolding-adding structure and support-helps students practice at appropriate challenge levels. This support can come from peers or written prompts, and maintains motivation by helping students feel tasks are reasonable. Even high-quality practice requires sufficient quantity for benefits to accumulate. The learning curve isn't linear-early and late phases show flatter improvement than the middle phase. This occurs partly because measurement tools are less sensitive at extremes, and partly because practice tasks often pose inappropriate challenges-too difficult for beginners and too easy for experts. Goal-directed practice must be paired with targeted feedback to maximize learning. Like a GPS that not only shows distance from destination but provides directions, effective feedback identifies how current performance differs from goals and suggests adjustments. Research shows feedback is most effective when it identifies specific aspects needing improvement rather than providing generic evaluations. Timing feedback properly involves both how soon it's given (typically earlier is better) and how often (more frequently is generally better). More frequent feedback typically leads to more efficient learning by helping students address errors before they become entrenched. However, immediate feedback isn't always ideal-in some cases, delayed feedback better supports the development of self-correction skills. To create effective goal-directed practice, instructors should make learning goals explicit, use rubrics to communicate performance criteria clearly, build in multiple shorter practice opportunities, incorporate scaffolding, and provide examples of target performance. For effective feedback, they should look for patterns of errors across student work, prioritize feedback on key aspects, balance feedback on strengths and weaknesses, and consider providing feedback at the group level when appropriate.

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

轻松跟读，《学习是如何运作的》中的每个词都会随音频实时高亮。

第 7 章

Course Climate and Student Development: The Social Context of Learning

Students are not merely intellectual beings but also social and emotional ones, and these dimensions interact within the classroom environment to influence learning outcomes. While college students experience significant social, emotional, and intellectual development, these emotions can overwhelm their intellect if they haven't learned to channel them productively. Student-centered teaching requires recognizing the complex challenges college students face. Beyond academic demands, students aged 17-22 are establishing independence, building new social networks, negotiating differences with peers, managing finances, making decisions about personal behaviors, and encountering ideas that challenge their existing values. Chickering's model systematically accounts for developmental changes through seven cumulative vectors: developing competence (intellectual, physical, interpersonal), managing emotions, developing autonomy, establishing identity, freeing interpersonal relationships, developing purpose, and developing integrity. These vectors shape how students engage with course content, their motivation, and their sense of identity in their chosen field. Intellectual development progresses through qualitative shifts in thinking. In early stages, students exhibit dualistic thinking, viewing knowledge as absolute right/wrong statements delivered by authorities. When challenged by questions without clear answers, they move to multiplicity, where knowledge becomes a matter of opinions, all seemingly equally valid. With sufficient emphasis on evidence-based reasoning, students advance to relativism, recognizing that opinions must be evaluated according to disciplinary standards. Social identity development-how students identify with certain social groups-is particularly salient for college students. Various models follow similar trajectories culminating in positive group identity. The process begins with a naive stage without prejudice, followed by acceptance of societal messages about different groups. Many students remain here unless challenged, potentially moving to resistance where they become acutely aware of societal "isms." Successfully navigating this stage leads to redefinition and internalization, where identity becomes one aspect of self rather than a defining feature. Course climate encompasses the intellectual, social, emotional, and physical environments in which students learn. It's shaped by faculty-student interaction, instructor tone, stereotyping, course demographics, student-student interaction, and the perspectives represented in course content. Beyond obviously offensive stereotypes, subtle stereotype activation can profoundly impact learning through "stereotype threat." This occurs when members of stereotyped groups fear being judged according to those stereotypes, negatively affecting their performance regardless of ability. Simply having African American students indicate their race before taking a standardized test activated negative stereotypes and significantly depressed their performance. Course climate extends beyond identity factors to how instructors communicate with students. Even identical course policies worded differently-punitively versus encouragingly-significantly influence students' perceptions of instructor approachability and willingness to seek help. When students perceive faculty as interested in their academic problems, approachable outside class, and treating them as individuals rather than numbers, this positively impacts retention, graduate school attendance rates, and self-reported critical thinking skills. To promote student development and productive climate, instructors should model inclusive language and behavior, use multiple diverse examples, establish ground rules for interaction, ensure course content doesn't marginalize students, set up processes to get feedback on climate, anticipate sensitive issues, address tensions early, turn discord into learning opportunities, and facilitate active listening.

第 8 章

Self-Directed Learning: Developing Metacognitive Skills

Why do some students continue to struggle despite putting in hours of effort? Consider Melanie, who starts her history paper at the last minute, and John, who studies diligently but ineffectively for chemistry exams. Both perform below expectations without understanding why. Despite different approaches, both students fail to recognize the shortcomings in their strategies or adapt to new intellectual challenges. The core issue is metacognition-the process of reflecting on and directing one's own thinking. To become self-directed learners, students must learn to assess the demands of the task, evaluate their own knowledge and skills, plan their approach, monitor their progress, and adjust their strategies as needed. Research models of metacognition share the fundamental concept that learners must engage in cyclical processes to monitor and control their learning. Students often struggle with accurately assessing tasks, frequently ignoring assignment instructions and defaulting to familiar strategies from previous educational experiences. They also typically overestimate their abilities, with weaker students being particularly poor at self-assessment. When planning, students tend to spend too little time on this crucial phase compared to experts, and their plans often don't match the task requirements. Research shows that students who naturally monitor their progress and explain concepts to themselves while learning achieve better outcomes, and teaching self-monitoring skills improves learning gains. However, even when students identify problems in their approach, they may resist changing strategies due to perceived costs in time and effort. Students' beliefs about intelligence and learning profoundly influence their metacognitive processes. Whether they view learning as fast and easy or slow and difficult, and whether they perceive intelligence as fixed or malleable affects their approach to learning. Students who believe intelligence is fixed see little reason to invest effort, while those who believe it's malleable engage more deeply with challenging material. To help students develop metacognitive skills, instructors should be more explicit than they might think necessary about task requirements, providing clear performance criteria with assignments. Early, performance-based assessments with timely feedback help students accurately evaluate their abilities. For complex assignments, providing model plans with interim deadlines helps students understand the components of complex tasks and their logical sequencing. Equipping students with simple heuristics for self-correction, requiring reflection and annotation of work, and including formal reflection requirements in assignments all help students develop metacognitive awareness. "Exam wrappers"-short handouts completed when exams are returned-guide students through analyzing their performance and connecting it to study methods. Addressing students' limiting beliefs about learning directly, broadening their understanding of knowledge types, and giving realistic expectations about skill development timeframes all support metacognitive development. Modeling your own metacognitive processes by "thinking aloud" and providing scaffolding that gradually diminishes as students develop mastery further enhance these essential skills.

从《学习是如何运作的》中收获更多

每日获取新洞见，探索 10 万+ 条课程内容
文字实时高亮，与音频同步
保存你的书库，在所有设备上随时访问

第 9 章

Applying the Principles: A Continuous Improvement Approach to Teaching

The seven learning principles we've explored are powerful tools that explain a wide range of learning behaviors and inform effective course design. What's particularly valuable is recognizing that these same principles apply to us as instructors, as we too are still learning about teaching. Teaching is a complex activity requiring constant adaptation, and most of us lack formal pedagogical training. Rather than seeking static perfection, we should approach teaching as a process of progressive refinement guided by these very principles. Like our students, we possess prior knowledge that affects our teaching. This includes our content expertise (necessary but insufficient), misconceptions (like believing good teaching requires an entertaining personality), and our own learning experiences (which may not translate to our students). Learning about our students provides crucial context that helps us build on our prior knowledge and tailor our teaching appropriately. Many instructors begin with compartmentalized teaching knowledge organized by course features rather than deeper principles. The learning principles presented in this book offer a more meaningful structure for organizing teaching knowledge, creating a flexible framework that transfers across different teaching contexts. Our motivation to improve teaching depends on both value and expectancy. We value efficiency-strategies that require upfront investment but yield long-term time savings (like rubrics) satisfy this need. Maintaining motivation requires setting realistic teaching goals, perhaps focusing on improving just one or two aspects per semester rather than attempting wholesale changes. Teaching mastery requires acquiring component skills, integrating them, and applying them appropriately. Discussion facilitation alone demands multiple subskills: posing questions, listening empathetically, maintaining flow, correcting misconceptions, and managing time. We need fluency in each skill to reduce cognitive load, plus the ability to determine when and where different teaching strategies are most applicable. Developing teaching mastery requires coupling practice with feedback. End-of-semester evaluations come too late for immediate improvement; formative feedback throughout the term from early evaluations, student management teams, colleagues, and teaching centers is more valuable. When we think of teaching as deliberate practice, we can target specific skills needing development. As instructors, we undergo intellectual development-moving from seeking pedagogical "magic bullets" to understanding teaching as contextual decision-making focused on student learning. Our teaching identity also evolves as we develop competence, autonomy, integrity, and appropriate classroom presence. The principles in this book help us become more metacognitive about our teaching. Self-directed improvement requires engaging in a cyclical process: assessing our strengths and weaknesses, planning effective approaches, monitoring progress, evaluating outcomes, and making adjustments. Being aware of our core beliefs about teaching and learning is essential-if we view teaching as a developable skill rather than an innate talent, we're more likely to engage in continuous improvement through reflection, collaboration, and professional development. By applying these principles to our own practice, we not only become more effective teachers but also model the very learning processes we hope to instill in our students-creating a virtuous cycle of improvement that benefits everyone in the educational community.

★★★★★

你已读完《学习是如何运作的》

深受 100 万+ 学习者喜爱

“坚持使用 23 天了，我每天都会打开它。它现在已经成为我的日常习惯。”

jayallen

《学习是如何运作的》核心主题

prior knowledge activation
cognitive knowledge organization
expert novice gap
misconception correction
evidence based pedagogy

《学习是如何运作的》经典语录

Prior knowledge acts as both foundation and filter.
Motivation requires two essential components: subjective value and expectancies for success.

《学习是如何运作的》主要人物

Susan A. AmbroseLead author and educator at Carnegie Mellon
Herbert SimonNobel Prize winner who endorsed the book's work

关于作者

Susan A. Ambrose 是《学习之道：助力卓越教学的七种研究型原则》(How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching) 的作者，也是高等教育领域应用教育心理学和认知科学的顶尖专家。她拥有卡内基梅隆大学美国历史学博士学位，曾担任该校负责教育事务的副教务长及埃伯利教学卓越中心 (Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence) 主任，在那里她开创了以学习研究为基础的教师发展项目。

她的工作架起了认知心理学、教育理论与实际教学策略之间的桥梁，将复杂的研究转化为教育工作者可操作的原则。Ambrose 曾在卡内基梅隆大学和东北大学担任领导职务，目前在东北大学继续担任教育学与历史学教授。

她曾担任美国工程教育协会和国家科学基金会 (NSF) 的访问学者，并获得了包括 NSF 和阿尔弗雷德·P·斯隆基金会 (Alfred P. Sloan Foundation) 在内的机构提供的重大资助。《学习之道》已被翻译成多种语言，并被国际上的大学教师和 K-12 教师广泛使用，成为循证教学法领域的奠基性著作。

下载《学习是如何运作的》摘要

免费获取《学习是如何运作的》摘要的 PDF 或 EPUB 版本。可打印或随时离线阅读。

用户还喜欢

How We Learn

Stanislas Dehaene

How We Learn

Benedict Carey

Learning That Sticks

Bryan Goodwin & Tonia Gibson & Kristin Rouleau

Uncommon Sense Teaching

Barbara Oakley

Design for how people learn

Julie Dirksen

Science-Backed Secrets to Transform Your Learning Forever 书籍封面

How to Learn Better: Proven Strategies from Make It Stick and Huberman Lab - Leap with AI

Learning Retention: Best Practices to Improve Retention - Whatfix

6 sources

Science-Backed Secrets to Transform Your Learning Forever

Learn Better

Ulrich Boser

The Learning Power Approach

Guy Claxton

关于本书的常见问题

发现更多

学习计划

The science of teaching

This learning plan bridges the gap between cognitive science and classroom practice, providing educators with a rigorous foundation in how the human brain learns. It is ideal for teachers, instructional designers, and educational leaders looking to replace intuition with evidence-based strategies that guarantee student success.

3 h 44 m•4 章节

学习计划

How to study and learn

This plan bridges the gap between cognitive science and practical application for anyone looking to optimize their brain's potential. It is ideal for students, professionals, and lifelong learners who want to stop wasting time on ineffective habits and start mastering complex subjects faster.

4 h 28 m•4 章节

学习计划

Learn engaging teaching methods for fun study

This plan is essential for educators and trainers looking to move beyond traditional lectures and foster genuine excitement for learning. It bridges the gap between cognitive science and classroom practice, making it ideal for anyone wanting to boost student retention and engagement.

4 h 8 m•4 章节

学习计划

Mastering the Laws of Human Nature

This learning plan is essential for professionals who want to move beyond surface-level interactions and understand the psychological drivers of behavior. It is particularly valuable for aspiring leaders and women navigating complex corporate environments who need to master both self-regulation and social influence.

2 h•4 章节

学习计划

Understanding human mind

This learning plan bridges the gap between biological neuroscience and practical psychology to reveal how our brains construct reality. It is ideal for curious minds, professionals, and students seeking to master their cognitive processes and understand the hidden drivers of human behavior.

5 h 31 m•4 章节

学习计划

Rewire Your Mind for Mastery

This plan is designed for lifelong learners and professionals seeking a cognitive edge in a rapidly changing world. By combining neuroscience, metacognition, and social psychology, it provides a comprehensive toolkit for personal and professional evolution.

1 h 30 m•3 章节

学习计划

The Architecture of a Cultivated Mind

This plan is designed for lifelong learners and professionals seeking to deepen their intellectual foundations beyond surface-level information. It provides the essential tools for anyone looking to master critical thinking, classical literacy, and the rigorous discipline of self-directed study.

1 h 30 m•3 章节

学习计划

The Human Book: Decoding Hidden Intent

In an era of complex communication, understanding what remains unsaid is a critical competitive advantage. This plan is essential for leaders, negotiators, and recruiters who need to master behavioral baselines, facial analysis, and linguistic markers to navigate high-stakes interactions.

1 h 30 m•3 章节

由哥伦比亚大学校友在旧金山创建

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

查看更多网络上关于 BeFreed 的讨论

由哥伦比亚大学校友在旧金山创建

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

查看更多网络上关于 BeFreed 的讨论

开启你的学习之旅，就是现在

第 7 章

学习是如何运作的

概述《学习是如何运作的》概述

一本书，多种聆听方式。

The Science of Learning: Unlocking How Students Master Knowledge

The Foundation: How Prior Knowledge Shapes Learning

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

Knowledge Organization: The Architecture of Understanding

Motivation: The Engine That Drives Learning

从 《学习是如何运作的》中收获更多

Mastery Development: Beyond Simple Knowledge Acquisition

The Practice-Feedback Loop: Refining Performance Through Iteration

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

Course Climate and Student Development: The Social Context of Learning

Self-Directed Learning: Developing Metacognitive Skills

从 《学习是如何运作的》中收获更多

Applying the Principles: A Continuous Improvement Approach to Teaching

你已读完 《学习是如何运作的》

《学习是如何运作的》核心主题

《学习是如何运作的》经典语录

《学习是如何运作的》主要人物

关于作者

下载《学习是如何运作的》摘要

用户还喜欢

关于本书的常见问题

What is How Learning Works by Susan A. Ambrose about?

Who is Susan A. Ambrose and what are her credentials?

Who should read How Learning Works?

Is How Learning Works by Susan A. Ambrose worth reading?

发现更多

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

一本书，多种聆听方式。

The Science of Learning: Unlocking How Students Master Knowledge

The Foundation: How Prior Knowledge Shapes Learning

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

Knowledge Organization: The Architecture of Understanding

Motivation: The Engine That Drives Learning

从 《学习是如何运作的》中收获更多

Mastery Development: Beyond Simple Knowledge Acquisition

The Practice-Feedback Loop: Refining Performance Through Iteration

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

Course Climate and Student Development: The Social Context of Learning

Self-Directed Learning: Developing Metacognitive Skills

从 《学习是如何运作的》中收获更多

Applying the Principles: A Continuous Improvement Approach to Teaching

你已读完 《学习是如何运作的》

用户还喜欢

发现更多

《学习是如何运作的》概述

从《学习是如何运作的》中收获更多

从《学习是如何运作的》中收获更多

你已读完《学习是如何运作的》

从《学习是如何运作的》中收获更多

从《学习是如何运作的》中收获更多

你已读完《学习是如何运作的》