4
The Trap of the "Golden" Competition 11:18 Lena: One of the most common ways this sabotage happens is through "triangulation." It’s like a play with three characters: the narcissist at the top, and two other people at the bottom competing for their attention. In this listener’s case, the other woman was trying to force a triangle. She wanted to be the "golden" option, making the listener the "scapegoat."
11:38 Nia: Triangulation is such a classic "divide and conquer" move. The person at the top—the saboteur in this scenario—gets to feel like the ultimate prize. They feed off the drama and the "narcissistic supply" of having two people stressed out over them. It’s a way to avoid accountability, too. If things get messy, they can just blame the "jealous" partner or the "obsessive" pursuer.
11:59 Lena: But here’s the thing: the triangle only works if everyone plays their part. If the partner refuses to be the "prize" and the listener refuses to "compete," the whole structure falls apart. The saboteur is left standing alone in a triangle that’s just a straight line.
12:15 Nia: Right! And the way the partner responded was a masterclass in breaking a triangle. By pointing out the "blood on her shoes," he didn't just reject her; he de-valued the game itself. He was saying, "I’m not a prize to be won through sabotage, and I’m not interested in a competition that requires hurting the person I love."
12:32 Lena: It’s so powerful because triangulation thrives on insecurity. It exploits our basic human need to belong and be chosen. When someone says, "Look, I’m better than her," or "He likes me more," it triggers that primal fear of being replaced. That’s why our heart rate spikes and our "fight or flight" kicks in.
12:53 Nia: And for "driven women"—as Annie Wright calls them—this can be a huge trap. We’re used to working hard to solve problems. We think if we can just "manage" the situation better, or be "better" than the saboteur, we can win. But you can’t "win" a rigged game. The only way to win is to stop playing.
8:34 Lena: Exactly. The saboteur wants you to exert all your energy trying to "defend your territory." They want you exhausted and reactive. Because when you’re reactive, you’re easier to paint as the "crazy" one. It’s that DARVO pattern again: Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender.
13:29 Nia: Let’s break that down for a second. If the listener had confronted the woman directly, the woman likely would have used DARVO. She would *deny* she was doing anything wrong ("I was just being friendly!"), *attack* the listener's character ("You're so insecure and controlling"), and then *reverse* the roles so *she* was the victim of the listener's "unprovoked aggression."
13:52 Lena: It’s a perfect circle of manipulation. And it’s why so many women feel like they’re "losing their mind" in these situations. You’re being hit, but when you point to the bruise, you’re told there’s nothing there. But the partner in this story didn't let that happen. He saw the bruise. He saw the intent.
14:12 Nia: He saw the "blood." And that’s the key. When you stop looking at the "niceness" of the actions and start looking at the *impact* of the intent, the manipulation loses its power. If someone’s "friendly" behavior is making you feel unsafe and small, it’s not friendly. It’s an attack.
14:35 Lena: It’s also important to note that this kind of "jealousy induction" is a documented strategy. Research by Shahida Arabi and others shows that narcissists and psychopaths use jealousy to gain power and control. They want to see you "work" for their approval. They want to see you sweat. It’s a form of "narcissistic supply."
14:54 Nia: But in this case, the partner didn't give her that supply. He gave her "the blood on her shoes" instead. He showed her that her "game" wasn't a secret—it was a mess. It was visible. And that is the ultimate defeat for a covert saboteur. They rely on their actions being "invisible" to the outside world.
15:18 Lena: It reminds me of the "phantom third party" tactic. Sometimes the saboteur will even make up competitors or use vague "everyone says" comments to make you feel like you’re on thin ice. They want you in a constant state of hypervigilance, always looking for the "other woman" who might be better, smarter, or more "understanding."
15:37 Nia: It’s emotional blackmail. It’s saying, "If you don't do exactly what I want, there’s someone else waiting in the wings who will." It’s an attempt to keep you in a state of "compliance through fear." But when you have a secure bond—what we call a "couple bubble"—that fear doesn't have a place to take root.
15:59 Lena: The "couple bubble" is such a great image. It’s that safe space where both partners agree to protect each other’s vulnerability. In this story, the bubble stayed intact. The saboteur tried to pop it, but the partner reinforced the walls. He prioritized his partner’s emotional safety over the "social validation" of being pursued.
Nia: And that’s the "both/and" we have to hold. You can be a strong, capable person *and* you can be targeted by a systematic campaign of sabotage. Being targeted isn't a sign of weakness; it’s often a sign that you have something—a success, a connection, an identity—that the saboteur wants for themselves.