3
Navigating the Legal Maze of the Companies Act 4:07 Jackson: You mentioned earlier that the rules changed a bit back in 2013 and then again with some updates around 2016. For someone trying to keep their company compliant today, what are the "must-know" sections of the Companies Act? It feels like there’s a lot of legalese to wade through.
4:24 Nia: It can definitely feel like an alphabet soup! But if we boil it down, there are a few heavy hitters. First, there’s Section 134(5)(e). This is a big one for directors. It requires the Board of Directors of listed companies to state that they’ve laid down internal financial controls and that those controls are "adequate and operating effectively."
4:43 Jackson: So the directors are actually on the hook? It's not just something they can delegate to the finance team and forget about?
4:49 Nia: Oh, they are absolutely on the hook. They have to sign off on a Directors’ Responsibility Statement. And it’s not just listed companies. Rule 8 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules says the Board Report for *all* companies needs to state details about the adequacy of these controls.
5:03 Jackson: That’s a lot of responsibility. And what about the auditors? I know they have a specific role in reporting this to the government.
5:10 Nia: Right, that’s Section 143(3)(i). The statutory auditors have to give an opinion on whether the company has an adequate internal financial controls system in place and if it’s actually working. This is in addition to their opinion on the financial statements themselves.
5:26 Jackson: I remember reading that there was some confusion about who exactly this applies to—like, does a small mom-and-pop shop need the same level of auditing as a massive conglomerate?
5:36 Nia: That’s a great question, and it’s where the MCA—the Ministry of Corporate Affairs—stepped in with some exemptions. As of now, certain private companies are exempt from the *auditor* reporting on ICFR. This includes One Person Companies and "Small Companies."
5:50 Jackson: And "Small Company" has a very specific definition, right?
5:55 Nia: It does! And it actually just changed. As of December 2025, the thresholds were revised. Now, a "Small Company" is one with a paid-up capital of less than 10 crore rupees and a turnover of less than 100 crore rupees.
6:09 Jackson: Okay, so if I’m under those limits, I’m in the clear?
6:13 Nia: Well, here’s the "pro-tip" for business health: you might be exempt from the *auditor* reporting on it, but the *directors* are still responsible for safeguarding assets and preventing fraud. Section 134 still applies to you. So even if the auditor doesn’t have to write a report about it, you still need to have those controls in place to protect the business.
6:31 Jackson: It’s like saying you’re exempt from a professional home inspection, but you still need to make sure your front door actually locks so your stuff doesn't get stolen.
2:27 Nia: Exactly! And there’s one more catch—to keep those exemptions, you have to be up to date with your filings. If you default on filing your financial statements or annual returns, you lose that exemption for the year. It’s the law’s way of saying, "If you want the lighter touch on regulation, you have to at least do the basic paperwork on time."
7:00 Jackson: That’s a really important distinction. The responsibility for the controls exists even when the reporting requirement is relaxed. It’s about the fundamental health of the company, not just satisfying a regulator.