What is *Zucked* by Roger McNamee about?

*Zucked* exposes Facebook’s unchecked power, detailing how its algorithms manipulate user behavior, enable political polarization, and threaten democracy. Roger McNamee, an early mentor to Mark Zuckerberg, combines insider insights with critiques of surveillance capitalism, microtargeting, and events like the Cambridge Analytica scandal. The book serves as a urgent call for regulatory oversight to curb tech giants’ ethical failures.

Who should read *Zucked* by Roger McNamee?

This book is essential for policymakers, tech ethicists, and anyone concerned about social media’s societal impact. Entrepreneurs, journalists, and students studying data privacy or digital ethics will gain critical insights into Silicon Valley’s unchecked growth and its consequences for democracy.

Is *Zucked* worth reading?

Yes. McNamee’s firsthand accounts of Facebook’s rise, coupled with analysis of its role in election interference and addiction-driven design, offer a compelling case for tech accountability. Its blend of memoir and investigative reporting makes it a vital resource for understanding modern digital risks.

What are the main ideas in *Zucked*?

- **Surveillance capitalism**: Facebook monetizes user data through microtargeting and behavioral manipulation. - **Addiction by design**: Algorithms exploit psychological vulnerabilities to keep users engaged. - **Democratic threats**: Platforms amplify misinformation, enabling foreign interference and extremist echo chambers. - **Regulatory failure**: McNamee argues for urgent government intervention to limit data exploitation.

How does *Zucked* explain Facebook’s impact on democracy?

The book highlights Facebook’s role in the 2016 U.S. election and Brexit, where Russian operatives spent just $100,000 to sway voters via targeted ads. McNamee argues that the platform’s preference bubbles and algorithmic amplification of divisive content undermine informed public discourse.

What does *Zucked* reveal about the Cambridge Analytica scandal?

McNamee details how Cambridge Analytica harvested millions of user profiles to create psychographic models, tailoring political ads to exploit individual biases. He frames this as a systemic failure of Facebook’s lax data policies and prioritization of growth over accountability.

How does *Zucked* critique Facebook’s corporate culture?

The book condemns Facebook’s “move fast and break things” ethos, accusing leadership of ignoring societal harm for profit. McNamee describes Zuckerberg and Sandberg as dismissive of concerns about misinformation, polarization, and privacy breaches.

What solutions does *Zucked* propose for regulating social media?

- **Transparency mandates**: Require platforms to disclose how algorithms prioritize content. - **Data privacy laws**: Limit collection and sharing of user information. - **Antitrust enforcement**: Break up monopolies to reduce centralized power. - **Public oversight**: Create independent agencies to audit tech companies.

페이스북의 배신

어느 예상치 못한 활동가의 교육

로저 맥나미

3.7(3235 Reviews)

페이스북의 배신 개요

페이스북 멘토에서 내부 고발자로: 로저 맥나미(Roger McNamee)의 내부자 폭로는 소셜 미디어가 어떻게 정신을 하이재킹하고 민주주의를 위협하는지 밝혀냅니다. 세일즈포스의 마크 베니오프와 인터넷의 선구자 빈트 서프가 극찬한 이 뉴욕 타임스 베스트셀러는 묻습니다: 기술의 약속이 우리의 가장 큰 취약점이 될 때 어떤 일이 벌어질까요?

전달 방식을 선택하세요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

페이스북의 배신의 같은 아이디어를 담았습니다. 나에게 맞는 목소리, 깊이, 속도를 고르고 언제든 바꿔 보세요.

1장

The Digital Reckoning: How Facebook Became a Threat to Democracy

In 2016, a disturbing realization hit Roger McNamee, a longtime tech investor and early Facebook advisor: the platform he had championed for a decade was being weaponized to undermine democracy. His book "Zucked" chronicles this journey from Facebook evangelist to critic, offering a rare insider's perspective on Silicon Valley's most controversial company. The book has resonated with tech industry leaders, policymakers, and celebrities alike - even Barack Obama reportedly keeps it on his nightstand. As social media's influence on society has grown increasingly contentious, McNamee's warnings have proven prophetic, making this one of the most cited works in the ongoing debate about technology's role in society. What began as one investor's concerns has evolved into a global conversation about the responsibilities tech platforms have to their users and to democracy itself.

2장

The Perfect Storm: How Facebook's Design Enabled Manipulation

Facebook emerged at a unique moment in technological history. For fifty years, Silicon Valley had operated under tight engineering constraints - never enough processing power, memory, storage, or bandwidth to meet customer needs. This environment rewarded skilled, experienced engineers making difficult trade-offs. But just as Facebook launched, these constraints transformed into accelerators as computational resources became abundant and affordable. The cost of storage plummeted from $10 per gigabyte in 2000 to mere cents by 2004, while processing power continued to follow Moore's Law of doubling every two years. This fundamental shift enabled platforms like Facebook to develop in ways previously impossible. The "lean startup" model emerged as open source software and cloud services dramatically reduced infrastructure costs. Amazon Web Services, launched in 2006, allowed startups to rent server capacity by the hour instead of purchasing expensive hardware. Startups could launch minimum viable products quickly, gather data, and iterate rapidly. Facebook's "Move fast and break things" motto perfectly embodied this philosophy - forget strategy, build something, try it in the market, fix mistakes, repeat. This approach led to rapid innovation but also created systemic vulnerabilities as features were deployed without thorough security testing or ethical consideration. Zuckerberg's privileged background as the child of medical professionals prepared him well for success, but his particular advantage was unique to his era - the ability to build a team of inexperienced people his own age whom he could completely mold. Unlike previous tech generations where experienced engineers were essential, Facebook didn't need them. The simplification of development tools and abundance of computing resources meant that young programmers could quickly build complex systems. Zuck could build with young people who bought completely into his vision, creating a culture of unwavering loyalty and shared beliefs about technology's role in society. Silicon Valley simultaneously embraced libertarianism, prioritizing individual achievement over collective good. This philosophy absolved entrepreneurs of responsibility for their actions' broader impacts while conferring advantages on the already privileged. The "meritocracy" inside tech companies often led to homogeneous workforces of predominantly white and Asian males, narrowing the range of acceptable ideas and potentially affecting product design. Studies showed that by 2014, major tech companies' technical workforces were often less than 2% Black and 3% Hispanic, with women representing only about 15% of technical roles. Economically, Reagan-era neoliberalism had replaced government regulation with market forces. While deregulation generally favored incumbents over startups in most sectors, Silicon Valley thrived as large tech companies struggled to keep pace with rapid technological change. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 had effectively removed many barriers to digital platform growth. These internet platforms achieved unprecedented scale through network effects, free products, and riding broadband adoption waves. Facebook's user base grew from 1 million in 2004 to over 100 million by 2008, achieving a scale and influence that traditional media companies had taken decades to build. The result was a perfect storm: a platform designed to maximize engagement without regard for consequences, led by a homogeneous team with little experience or perspective beyond their own, operating in an environment with minimal regulatory oversight. When combined with Facebook's unprecedented global reach, this created the conditions for manipulation at a scale never before possible in human history. The platform's algorithms, optimized for engagement, inadvertently amplified divisive content and misinformation, while its massive user base made it an irresistible target for both commercial and political manipulation campaigns.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

페이스북의 배신의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

3장

The Engagement Machine: How Facebook Captures and Holds Attention

At its core, Facebook is an attention-harvesting machine. Its algorithms are designed to maximize "time on site" by any means necessary. As former Google design ethicist Tristan Harris explains, platforms compete in a "race to the bottom of the brain stem," targeting low-level emotions like outrage and fear. Short videos, animated GIFs, and sensational headlines outperform factual content because the "space of falsehoods" can expand freely while truth remains fixed. Facebook's algorithms feed users content similar to what has engaged them before, refining their understanding with every click and share. With billions of monthly users generating data, Facebook's AI knows users better than they realize, and sells access to this data to advertisers. The platform's persuasive technology eliminates stopping cues, creates unpredictable rewards, and triggers social validation loops that humans find nearly impossible to resist. This design naturally pushes users into filter bubbles where they surround themselves with like-minded people. When content comes from trusted sources, users relax their vigilance, making them vulnerable to misinformation. Research shows groups of like-minded people become more extreme over time, and as few as 1-2% of coordinated actors can steer group conversations. Facebook's claim to be "just a platform" deflects responsibility for these effects, despite engineering every aspect of the user experience. The competition for attention rewards extreme views, as recommendation algorithms push users toward increasingly radical content. Users further isolate themselves in "preference bubbles," rejecting outside information and prioritizing tribal loyalty over facts, undermining democracy by eliminating common ground. In preference bubbles, facts and expertise become enemies to be defeated. As intelligence expert Clint Watts explains, "Whoever gets the most likes is in charge; whoever gets the most shares is an expert." These bubbles actively reject reality in favor of alternative facts that support their worldview. Facebook doesn't create preference bubbles but provides the perfect incubation environment, as its algorithms feed users who engage with one piece of disinformation more of the same. Platforms employ ten manipulation tools from Stanford professor B.J. Fogg's persuasive technology playbook. User control is an illusion - Facebook's interface design limits actions to those serving its interests while exploiting "dark patterns" to trick users. Terms of service are deliberately difficult to find and understand, protecting the company while giving it nearly unlimited permission. "Bottomless bowl" news feeds eliminate natural stopping cues, maximizing time on site. Notifications exploit the "foot in the door" strategy, appearing personal while actually being algorithmically generated to serve the platform's economic interests. Social psychology tools include exploiting our need for approval (the Like button), desire for reciprocity (following back, accepting friend requests), and fear of missing out (FOMO). Photo tagging brilliantly creates cycles of reciprocity while building Facebook's facial recognition database. For teenagers especially, these psychological triggers magnify already stressful social dynamics to harmful levels.

4장

From Social Network to Surveillance Machine: Facebook's Evolution

Facebook began as TheFacebook.com in February 2004, created by Harvard sophomore Mark Zuckerberg. Within a month, over half of Harvard students had registered, drawn by the exclusivity and real-name policy that made it a trusted network for campus social life. The site quickly expanded to other elite universities, starting with Stanford, Columbia, and Yale, creating a sense of prestige that drove rapid adoption. By June, the company relocated to Palo Alto and received its first venture funding of $500,000 from PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel, who recognized its potential to revolutionize human connection. Unlike predecessors Friendster and MySpace, which struggled with technical limitations and identity verification, Facebook's genius lay in conceptualizing the platform as a "social graph" - a network of nodes with information flowing between them. This mathematical approach, combined with requiring real identity, simplified the system architecture while creating a more authentic user experience. Where MySpace allowed creative freedom but suffered from fake profiles and spam, Facebook's structured format and identity verification helped it overcome the scaling challenges that had destroyed its competitors. The clean interface and standardized profiles became hallmarks of the platform's success. After its 2012 IPO raised sixteen billion dollars at a $104 billion valuation, Facebook faced intense Wall Street pressure to monetize its massive user base. The company's evolution from basic demographic targeting to sophisticated behavioral advertising was remarkable in both scope and speed. Facebook integrated data from third-party brokers, tracked users across the internet through "Like" buttons, and developed powerful tools like Custom Audiences (enabling businesses to target existing customers) and Lookalike Audiences (finding users similar to current customers). The introduction of the Facebook Pixel allowed unprecedented tracking of user behavior across websites, creating detailed consumer profiles. This relentless focus on metrics drove explosive growth: monthly active users increased from 1 billion in 2012 to 2.1 billion in 2017, while annual revenue soared from $5 billion to $40.7 billion. Despite controversies over measurement accuracy, including lawsuits about video metrics being inflated by up to 900%, Facebook's market dominance gave it leverage to dismiss concerns with minimal fixes. Advertisers, dependent on the platform's reach, had little choice but to accept Facebook's terms. The real power came from metadata - the digital breadcrumbs users leave behind with every interaction. Beyond explicit posts and likes, Facebook collected information about device types, location patterns, browsing habits, and social connections. This metadata allowed Facebook to offer advertisers unprecedented targeting capabilities, transforming advertising from broad demographic targeting to individualized manipulation based on psychological profiles and emotional triggers. The platform could identify everything from relationship status changes to pregnancy likelihood before users announced them. Facebook's business model fundamentally depends on maximizing engagement through emotional triggers, particularly fear and anger, which drive the highest rates of interaction. The platform's algorithms create a personalized reality for each user, carefully curating content to elicit emotional responses that increase time spent on the site. Like television and radio before it, Facebook has transformed citizens into passive consumers while becoming our de facto public square. However, unlike traditional media, this digital town hall is controlled by a single profit-maximizing entity with unprecedented power to shape public discourse through algorithmic manipulation and data harvesting. The platform that began as a college social network has evolved into perhaps the most sophisticated surveillance machine in human history.

페이스북의 배신에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

5장

The Warning Signs: Early Evidence of Facebook's Harmful Effects

McNamee's suspicions about Facebook began in February 2016 when he noticed an alarming pattern: misogynistic anti-Hillary content was spreading virally through Bernie Sanders-associated Facebook Groups at an unprecedented rate. The content's rapid proliferation and coordinated messaging suggested artificial amplification rather than organic user behavior. This observation became the first in a series of red flags that would ultimately reveal deeper systemic issues within Facebook's platform. Several troubling incidents quickly accumulated. A particularly concerning case involved the discovery of third-party data brokers purchasing and selling information from Black Lives Matter supporters directly to law enforcement agencies, effectively enabling surveillance of civil rights activists. The Brexit referendum's unexpected outcome raised additional alarms, as analysis showed Facebook's algorithm had systematically favored emotionally charged, fear-based messaging that may have significantly influenced voter behavior. Additionally, investigative journalists uncovered that Facebook's advertising tools were being exploited to enable housing discrimination, allowing property advertisers to exclude specific racial and ethnic groups from seeing their listings-a clear violation of fair housing laws. By November 2016, McNamee felt compelled to act. He composed a detailed two-page memo to both Zuckerberg and Sandberg, outlining specific examples of how malicious actors were weaponizing the platform. He drew parallels to Johnson & Johnson's exemplary handling of the 1982 Tylenol crisis, where the company immediately pulled all products nationwide and implemented tamper-proof packaging, prioritizing public safety over short-term profits. However, Facebook's leadership approached these warnings as merely a public relations challenge rather than a fundamental threat to democracy and user safety. The post-2016 election period marked a crucial turning point when McNamee joined forces with Tristan Harris, whose background as Google's design ethicist had led him to expose the sophisticated psychological manipulation techniques embedded in social media platforms. Harris had documented specific examples of how features like infinite scroll, autoplay, and notification systems were designed to exploit human psychological vulnerabilities to maximize engagement. Their subsequent meeting with Senator Mark Warner proved pivotal in understanding the scope of Russian interference. They presented evidence suggesting a sophisticated disinformation campaign that began as early as 2013-2014, targeting contentious social issues including immigration, gun rights, and racial tensions. Their analysis revealed how Russian operatives had likely exploited Facebook's Lookalike Audiences tool to precisely target both passionate activists and potential non-voters, while simultaneously creating seemingly authentic Facebook Groups on opposing sides of controversial issues to amplify social division. The validity of their concerns was soon confirmed through extensive journalistic investigations. Though Facebook initially maintained its neutrality, the company's security vice president eventually disclosed evidence of Russian interference: $100,000 spent on 3,000 ads from 470 fake accounts. While these numbers appeared modest, researcher Jonathan Albright's groundbreaking analysis revealed the true scale of the operation-posts from just six Russian-sponsored Groups had generated 340 million shares, demonstrating how Facebook's algorithm could amplify divisive content to massive reach with minimal financial investment. This revelation highlighted the platform's fundamental vulnerability to manipulation and its role in exacerbating societal divisions.

6장

Cambridge Analytica: The Scandal That Changed Everything

March 2018 brought near-daily revelations about social media's harmful effects. A study in Science magazine found disinformation spreads 70% more often than factual stories and six times faster on Twitter, with humans (not bots) preferring to share falsehoods. More seriously, a UN report accused Facebook of enabling religious persecution and ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya in Myanmar, with a UN investigator declaring that "Facebook has now turned into a beast." Then came the Cambridge Analytica bombshell. On March 16, Facebook preemptively announced the suspension of Cambridge Analytica and its parent SCL Group, attempting to get ahead of a massive story that broke the next day in The Observer, The Guardian, and The New York Times. The revelation: Cambridge Analytica had harvested 50 million Facebook profiles through researcher Aleksandr Kogan's personality test app, which collected data not just from the 270,000 test-takers but from all their friends. This data was used to build psychological profiles of American voters to target them with personalized political advertisements. The revelation was particularly damning as Facebook was operating under a 2011 FTC consent decree barring deceptive privacy practices, with potential penalties of $40,000 per violation - potentially trillions in fines. Facebook's attempts to minimize the fallout backfired spectacularly. Security VP Alex Stamos tried to reframe the story by denying it was a "data breach" since Kogan had authorization to harvest data for research purposes. This inadvertently confirmed that such harvesting was routine, suggesting every Facebook user profile in that era was likely harvested at least once. Cambridge Analytica merged Facebook's data with US voter files, matching at least 30 million profiles to voter records - approximately 13% of all eligible American voters. This combination allowed for exceptionally precise ad targeting within Facebook. Given that Trump won the electoral college by just 77,744 votes across three states while losing the popular vote by nearly 3 million, it seemed virtually impossible that Cambridge Analytica's data set hadn't influenced the outcome. Further investigation revealed Facebook had known about the connection between Kogan and Cambridge Analytica since December 2015, yet had taken minimal action - merely sending letters demanding data destruction without verification. Most damning was the revelation that Facebook had hired and continued to employ Joseph Chancellor, Kogan's partner in the data harvesting operation. The Cambridge Analytica story confirmed people's worst fears about Facebook - that relentless growth pursuit had led the company to disregard moral obligations to users, with potentially decisive consequences in a presidential election. The national conversation had reached a new level, creating a real test for Facebook with no good way to spin the story.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

페이스북의 배신의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

7장

Facebook's Failed Response: Deny, Delay, Deflect, Dissemble

Despite mounting evidence of Facebook's harmful effects, the company consistently responded with the same playbook: deny, delay, deflect, dissemble, and only apologize when truth became unavoidable. This pattern prompted technology scholar Zeynep Tufekci to frame Facebook's history as a "fourteen-year apology tour." Facebook's business is operationally simpler than similarly sized companies, allowing for highly centralized decision-making. Zuckerberg and Sandberg sit atop an organizational "antenna" with just a handful of others, while everyone else operates in the "loaf of bread" below. Sandberg's team-based management philosophy - "When we succeed, we do so as a team. When we fail, it is a team failure" - works well during good times but eliminates accountability for mistakes. With no individual credit, team members rarely challenge Zuckerberg, and when confronted with Russian interference, the company lacked the muscles to handle this unprecedented friction. Facebook's own employees live in their own preference bubble, convinced of their mission's nobility and rejecting criticism. They respond to every problem with more AI, more code, and more short-term fixes - not because they're bad people, but because success has warped their perception of reality. Zuckerberg's congressional testimony in April 2018 featured strategic timing that minimized preparation by senators, many of whom demonstrated limited understanding of Facebook's business model. Zuckerberg deployed a "run out the clock" strategy with long-winded answers and caught a lucky break when the FBI's raid on Michael Cohen's office diverted media attention. House members proved more prepared, with Representatives Castor, Lujan, and Kennedy exposing Facebook's extensive surveillance practices-including tracking non-users and collecting 29,000 data points on average users. After strong Q1 2018 earnings (revenue near $12 billion, profits up 63%, and 2.2 billion monthly active users), the company seemed to believe the crisis had passed. At their F8 developer conference, Facebook barely mentioned Cambridge Analytica and announced new features like a dating service and Clear History tool, treating the scandals as mere bumps in the road. The Clear History tool raised questions about Facebook's true intentions. While offering users the ability to clear browsing data might seem privacy-focused, it could also signal that Facebook no longer needs this historical data because its AI behavioral prediction engines have become sophisticated enough. These AI systems possess insurmountable advantages: infinite resources, detailed profiles of billions of users, complete understanding of location and relationships, and economic incentives to manipulate attention regardless of consequences.

8장

The Path Forward: Protecting Democracy from Platform Power

With 2.2 billion monthly users on its core platform and billions more across WhatsApp, Messenger, and Instagram, Facebook directly influences nearly 40 percent of the world's population - far greater reach than IBM's monopoly ever achieved. Unlike Coca-Cola's 1.9 billion daily beverages, Facebook influences elections and enables hate speech. This monopoly power may explain why Facebook felt little urgency to address obvious product flaws - users simply had nowhere else to go. The success of tech giants has distorted entrepreneurship, forcing startups to either avoid competing with giants or design businesses to be acquired by them. This has led to a flood of trivial startups targeting billionaires or services "your mother used to do for you." Regulations like GDPR impose compliance costs that disproportionately burden startups. Harvard professor Jonathan Zittrain's proposal to extend fiduciary rules to data-intensive companies would require platforms to prioritize user interests over profits when handling sensitive data. Unlike doctors and lawyers who must safeguard client privacy, internet platforms currently sell access to private information. A fiduciary standard would create compelling incentives for data privacy and security while giving consumers legal remedies beyond the arbitration currently forced by terms of service. Regulation could help address Facebook's problems, including requiring filter bubble-free views, data ownership for users, fiduciary responsibility for consumer data, data portability, and transparency. Economic policy should limit monopoly-class players and prevent acquisitions and cross-subsidies. As users, we have more power than we realize - platforms need our attention. We can resist becoming sheep by insisting on human-driven technology. Engaging with diverse opinions is essential for democracy, requiring us to break out of filter bubbles, invest time in being better informed, and apply critical thinking to all content. Making these changes may require an effort comparable to the campaign against smoking. The greatest threat to global order in our lifetime has been enabled by internet platforms. If we want to avoid an authoritarian future, we need to reduce their influence. Whatever good comes from these platforms cannot justify harm to billions and destabilization of vital institutions. Playing nice hasn't worked. Internet platforms have poisoned political discourse in democracies worldwide not because of social networking itself, but because of entrepreneurs' choices to monetize it. Internet platforms have inverted the traditional relationship - instead of technology serving humanity, humans now serve technology. The solution requires returning to human-driven technology as the Next Big Thing - shifting from exploiting psychological weaknesses to serving users' needs, possibly with government subsidies similar to those for energy or agriculture.

★★★★★

페이스북의 배신 완독을 축하합니다

100만 명 이상의 학습자가 사랑합니다

“23일째 매일 사용하고 있어요. 이제 제 일상의 한 부분이 되었습니다.”

jayallen

페이스북의 배신의 핵심 주제

surveillance capitalism
algorithmic manipulation
attention economy
digital democracy threats
silicon valley ethics

페이스북의 배신의 명언

Facebook is an attention-harvesting machine.
User control is an illusion.
Facebook doesn't create preference bubbles but provides the perfect incubation environment.

페이스북의 배신의 등장인물

Roger McNameeTech investor and early Facebook advisor
Tristan HarrisFormer Google design ethicist

저자 소개

벤처 캐피털리스트이자 기술 산업의 저명한 비판가인 로저 맥나미(Roger McNamee)는 소셜 미디어가 민주주의와 개인정보 보호에 가하는 위험을 폭로한 저서 *『저커버그 당하다: 페이스북의 재앙』(Zucked: Waking Up to the Facebook Catastrophe)*의 저자입니다.

1982년부터 실리콘밸리에서 활동해 온 베테랑인 맥나미는 엘리베이션 파트너스(Elevation Partners)와 실버 레이크 파트너스(Silver Lake Partners)를 공동 설립했습니다. 2006년부터 2009년까지 마크 저커버그의 멘토 역할을 했던 페이스북과 같은 기업들에 투자하며 쌓은 폭넓은 경험을 바탕으로, 그는 현재 기술 분야의 견제받지 않는 권력을 비판하고 있습니다.

2016년 대선 이후 시작된 그의 소셜 미디어 규제 옹호 활동은 그를 기술적 책임감을 강조하는 핵심적인 목소리로 자리매김하게 했습니다. 그는 타임(TIME) 지를 비롯해 MSNBC, CNBC 등에 출연하며 활발히 활동해 왔습니다.

맥나미의 이전 저서로는 닷컴 버블 이후의 경제 지형을 분석한 *『뉴 노멀』(The New Normal, 2004)*과 음악과 반문화 예술을 융합한 『문앨리스 레전드』(The Moonalice Legend) 시리즈가 있습니다.

그는 인디그래프(Indiegraf)와 로큰롤 명예의 전당 이사회 멤버로 활동 중이며, 위키미디어 재단을 공동 설립하기도 했습니다. *『저커버그 당하다』*는 2019년 타임 지의 커버 스토리인 "페이스북의 경종(The Facebook Wake-Up Call)"에 소개되며 기술 개혁의 중심점이 되었습니다.

페이스북의 배신 요약 다운로드

페이스북의 배신 요약을 무료 PDF 또는 EPUB으로 받으세요. 인쇄하거나 오프라인에서 언제든 읽을 수 있습니다.

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

Think Like Zuck

Ekaterina Walter

The Age of Surveillance Capitalism

Shoshana Zuboff

An Ugly Truth

Sheera Frenkel & Cecilia Kang

Jeff Horwitz

Zoë Schiffer

Ben Mezrich

Max Fisher

Christopher Wylie

이 책에 대한 FAQ

더 알아보기

학습 계획

The Digital Power Grab

In an era where data is the new oil, understanding the intersection of technology and political power is essential for maintaining democratic integrity. This plan is designed for policy advocates, tech ethics students, and concerned citizens who want to understand how surveillance capitalism reshapes our social and political institutions.

1 h 12 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Billionaires, Bots, and the Ballot

In an era where tech giants and high-net-worth individuals wield unprecedented power, understanding the mechanics of modern democracy is essential. This plan is ideal for political analysts, tech policy advocates, and concerned citizens looking to navigate the intersection of private capital and state machinery.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Social media effects review

Social media has become deeply embedded in daily life, yet most users remain unaware of its engineered design and far-reaching consequences on mental health and society. This learning plan is essential for anyone who uses social media and wants to understand its true impact while developing practical strategies to navigate the digital world more mindfully and intentionally.

4 h 32 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Surviving the Algorithmic Age

In an era where algorithms dictate our reality, understanding the mechanics of digital influence is essential for mental autonomy. This plan is designed for students, professionals, and daily internet users who want to move beyond passive scrolling and master their information environment.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

The Social X-Ray Vision Plan

In an era of digital noise, the ability to read people accurately is a superpower for leaders, negotiators, and anyone seeking deeper connections. This plan is designed for professionals and social navigators who want to master the hidden mechanics of human interaction and influence.

1 h 45 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Social Intelligence Blueprint

In an era of digital disconnect, mastering high-level social observation is a critical competitive advantage. This plan is designed for professionals and leaders who need to accurately read people and command presence in complex group environments.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

self promotion on X

In today's digital economy, X (formerly Twitter) remains one of the most powerful platforms for building personal brands, establishing thought leadership, and creating business opportunities. This learning plan is essential for entrepreneurs, creators, professionals, and anyone looking to amplify their voice, grow their influence, and leverage social media for career or business advancement in an increasingly competitive attention economy.

4 h 30 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Find daily alternatives to SM

This learning plan is essential for anyone feeling overwhelmed by social media's grip on their daily life and seeking to reclaim their time, attention, and relationships. It's particularly valuable for professionals, students, and creators who recognize that constant digital distraction is preventing them from doing their best work and experiencing genuine human connection. By following this structured approach, you'll transform your relationship with technology from reactive and draining to intentional and life-enhancing.

4 h 13 m•4 섹션

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

지금 바로 학습 여정을 시작하세요

2장

페이스북의 배신

개요페이스북의 배신 개요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

The Digital Reckoning: How Facebook Became a Threat to Democracy

The Perfect Storm: How Facebook's Design Enabled Manipulation

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Engagement Machine: How Facebook Captures and Holds Attention

From Social Network to Surveillance Machine: Facebook's Evolution

페이스북의 배신에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Warning Signs: Early Evidence of Facebook's Harmful Effects

Cambridge Analytica: The Scandal That Changed Everything

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Facebook's Failed Response: Deny, Delay, Deflect, Dissemble

The Path Forward: Protecting Democracy from Platform Power

페이스북의 배신 완독을 축하합니다

페이스북의 배신의 핵심 주제

페이스북의 배신의 명언

페이스북의 배신의 등장인물

저자 소개

페이스북의 배신 요약 다운로드

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

이 책에 대한 FAQ

What is Zucked by Roger McNamee about?

Who should read Zucked by Roger McNamee?

Is Zucked worth reading?

What are the main ideas in Zucked?

더 알아보기

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

The Digital Reckoning: How Facebook Became a Threat to Democracy

The Perfect Storm: How Facebook's Design Enabled Manipulation

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Engagement Machine: How Facebook Captures and Holds Attention

From Social Network to Surveillance Machine: Facebook's Evolution

페이스북의 배신에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Warning Signs: Early Evidence of Facebook's Harmful Effects

Cambridge Analytica: The Scandal That Changed Everything

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Facebook's Failed Response: Deny, Delay, Deflect, Dissemble

The Path Forward: Protecting Democracy from Platform Power

페이스북의 배신 완독을 축하합니다

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

더 알아보기

페이스북의 배신 개요