What is *Think Again* by Adam Grant about?

*Think Again* explores the power of questioning assumptions, updating beliefs, and embracing intellectual humility. Adam Grant argues that rethinking—both individually and collectively—helps navigate a rapidly changing world. The book is structured into three sections: rethinking personal opinions (Individual), fostering productive debates (Interpersonal), and applying these skills in education/workplaces (Collective).

Who should read *Think Again* by Adam Grant?

This book suits professionals, leaders, and anyone seeking to improve decision-making or foster innovation. It’s particularly valuable for those in dynamic fields (e.g., tech, education) where adaptability is crucial. Readers interested in psychology, communication, or overcoming cognitive biases will find actionable strategies.

Is *Think Again* worth reading?

Yes—*Think Again* offers evidence-based insights on overcoming overconfidence and engaging in constructive dialogue. Grant blends research (e.g., the Dunning-Kruger effect, task vs. relationship conflict) with real-world examples like the Mann Gulch fire survival story. Practical frameworks, such as “thinking like a scientist,” make it a standout for personal and professional growth.

What are the main concepts in *Think Again*?

Key ideas include: - **Confident humility**: Balancing self-assurance with openness to new evidence. - **Task vs. relationship conflict**: Prioritizing problem-solving over personal disputes. - **Scientist mindset**: Testing hypotheses instead of preaching/prosecuting opinions. - **Joy of being wrong**: Viewing mistakes as learning opportunities.

How does Adam Grant suggest winning debates in *Think Again*?

Grant advocates “persuasive listening”—asking “how” questions to understand opposing views—rather than arguing “why.” He emphasizes reducing stereotype-driven thinking and creating psychological safety for others to reconsider their positions.

What is the “scientist mindset” in *Think Again*?

This approach involves treating opinions as hypotheses to test, not identities to defend. Grant contrasts it with counterproductive mindsets: **preacher** (defending beliefs), **prosecutor** (attacking others), and **politician** (seeking approval). Thinking like a scientist encourages curiosity and evidence-based updates.

How does *Think Again* address workplace conflict?

The book distinguishes **task conflict** (healthy debates about ideas) from **relationship conflict** (toxic personal disputes). Grant highlights how organizations like Bridgewater Associates use task-focused disagreements to drive innovation while maintaining team cohesion.

What critiques exist about *Think Again*?

Some argue Grant’s emphasis on constant rethinking may undervalue conviction in leadership. Others note the strategies require mutual buy-in, which can be challenging in hierarchical environments. However, most praise its research-backed methods for fostering adaptability.

싱크 어게인

모르는 것이 무엇인지 아는 것의 힘

애덤 그랜트

3.96(48 Reviews)

싱크 어게인 개요

"싱크 어게인(Think Again)"에서 와튼 스쿨의 최우수 교수인 애덤 그랜트는 우리에게 지적 겸손을 받아들일 것을 제안합니다. 브레네 브라운의 추천을 받고 35개 언어로 번역된 이 밀리언셀러는 다음과 같은 질문을 던집니다. 당신의 가장 큰 강점이 지식이 아니라, 자신이 모른다는 사실을 기꺼이 인정하는 태도라면 어떨까요?

전달 방식을 선택하세요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

싱크 어게인의 같은 아이디어를 담았습니다. 나에게 맞는 목소리, 깊이, 속도를 고르고 언제든 바꿔 보세요.

1장

Challenging Certainty: The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know

Ever noticed how a toddler can ask "why" a hundred times in a row, yet as adults, we rarely question our own beliefs? Adam Grant's "Think Again" arrives as a timely antidote to our era of polarization and certainty. The book has garnered praise from thought leaders like Daniel Kahneman and Malcolm Gladwell, who calls it "an urgent read in today's divisive world." Since its 2021 release, it's become a cultural touchstone, appearing on Barack Obama's reading list and inspiring millions to reconsider their approach to knowledge. The book's central premise-that intelligence is not about how much we know but about how we respond when we don't know-resonates deeply in our information-saturated age. Grant, an organizational psychologist at Wharton and host of the popular WorkLife podcast, doesn't just tell us to rethink; he demonstrates why it might be the most valuable skill we can develop in a rapidly changing world.

2장

The Mindsets That Shape Our Thinking

When smokejumper Wagner Dodge found himself and his crew trapped by a rapidly advancing wildfire in Mann Gulch in 1949, he made a counterintuitive decision. Instead of continuing to run uphill with his team, he lit an "escape fire" that burned the grass in front of him, creating a fuel-free zone where he could safely lie down as the wildfire passed over. His crew, baffled by this unprecedented strategy, refused to follow him. Tragically, twelve men perished while Dodge survived. This disaster illustrates a crucial distinction in how we approach challenges. Most of us operate in one of three mental modes: preacher, prosecutor, or politician. As preachers, we defend our sacred beliefs against challenge. As prosecutors, we look for flaws in others' reasoning. As politicians, we campaign for approval from our audience. Each mode serves a purpose, but all three close us off from rethinking our positions. The alternative is to think like a scientist. Scientists don't defend existing knowledge-they revise it. They don't just seek to prove themselves right; they actively look for ways they might be wrong. This mindset treats knowledge as a hypothesis to be tested rather than a truth to be protected. The scientific approach proves valuable far beyond laboratories. In a study of Italian entrepreneurs, those trained to think scientifically generated over $12,000 in revenue compared to just $300 for the control group. Why? The scientific thinkers pivoted twice as often, abandoning failed hypotheses rather than remaining wedded to original strategies. This difference in thinking explains why BlackBerry, once commanding nearly half the U.S. smartphone market, collapsed to less than 1% by 2014. Co-founder Mike Lazaridis, despite his technical brilliance, dismissed touchscreens and focused exclusively on physical keyboards. When Apple introduced the iPhone, Lazaridis scoffed: "Try typing on a touchscreen without looking at it-impossible." He remained in preacher mode, defending BlackBerry's approach rather than rethinking it, even as evidence mounted that consumers wanted something different. Intelligence doesn't guarantee adaptability. In fact, being smart can make us more vulnerable to fixed thinking. Studies show that math experts are better at analyzing data only when it doesn't contradict their ideological views. When it does, their analytical skills become liabilities, deployed to protect rather than test their beliefs.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

싱크 어게인의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

3장

The Confidence Paradox

When Ursula Mercz gradually lost her vision, she insisted she could see despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. This neurological condition, Anton's syndrome, reveals a profound truth about human cognition: we all have blind spots that leave us "blind to our blindness." This cognitive blindness manifests in the Dunning-Kruger effect, where those with the least knowledge often have the most inflated self-assessments. In one study, participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic estimated themselves to be in the 62nd percentile. The least competent believed they outperformed most peers when they actually ranked near the bottom. This overconfidence appears across cultures but is most pronounced where management quality is poorest. It creates a dangerous situation where those who most need to improve are least likely to recognize it. The confidence paradox reveals itself in contrasting approaches to leadership. When Halla Tomasdottir was encouraged to run for Iceland's presidency despite feeling unqualified, she experienced impostor syndrome. Meanwhile, Davi Oddsson, partly responsible for Iceland's economic collapse, confidently ran without relevant qualifications. The sweet spot isn't a Goldilocks balance between confidence and humility, but rather what Grant calls "confident humility"-believing in your ability while questioning your tools and methods. This allows us to reexamine old knowledge while pursuing new insights. Impostor syndrome, typically viewed as detrimental, can actually provide three benefits: it motivates harder work, encourages smarter work by putting us in a beginner's mindset, and makes us better learners by encouraging us to seek insights from others. In a hospital study, nurses with doubts about their leadership capabilities were more effective leaders because they sought second opinions from colleagues. As Halla discovered during her presidential campaign, impostor feelings can be fuel for growth rather than signs of inadequacy. Rather than waiting for confidence to rise, she built it through achieving challenging goals. Her uncertainty about traditional campaign methods led her to rethink strategies-personally answering social media messages, holding Facebook Live sessions, and running a positive campaign that resonated with voters.

4장

Finding Joy in Being Wrong

Nobel Prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman demonstrates a rare quality: the joy of being wrong. When surprised by research findings, rather than getting defensive, his eyes light up as he exclaims, "That was wonderful. I was wrong." For Kahneman, discovering he's wrong feels joyful because it means he's learned something new. His secret? He refuses to let beliefs become part of his identity: "My attachment to my ideas is provisional. There's no unconditional love for them." This requires two key detachments: separating your present from your past self, and detaching opinions from identity. Research shows that feeling detached from past selves can reduce depression over time. As Ray Dalio puts it, "If you don't look back at yourself and think, 'Wow, how stupid I was a year ago,' then you must not have learned much." This approach powers exceptional forecasting. Jean-Pierre Beugoms stands out as an exceptional forecaster who correctly predicted Trump's nomination when experts gave him only 6% odds. What makes great forecasters like Jean-Pierre successful isn't just intelligence but their willingness to update beliefs frequently. The best forecasters updated predictions four times per question (versus the average two), treating opinions as hunches rather than facts. Even Jean-Pierre struggled with his Trump prediction, eventually changing his forecast to Clinton when contemplating a Trump presidency kept him awake at night. Rather than being defensive about this error, he freely admits falling victim to desirability bias and even laughs at himself. Being able to laugh at ourselves indicates comfort with being wrong, and research shows people who make fun of themselves tend to be happier. Jean-Pierre's technique involves listing conditions under which he would change his mind about a prediction, preventing attachment to bad forecasts. This approach stands in stark contrast to Ted Kaczynski (the Unabomber), whose manifesto shows disturbing conviction with no consideration of alternative views or possibility of being wrong. When encountering new information, we have a choice: we can stubbornly attach opinions to our identities or operate like scientists committed to pursuing truth-even if it means proving ourselves wrong.

싱크 어게인에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

5장

The Art of Productive Disagreement

The Wright brothers exemplify productive conflict, having "thought together" by arguing constantly. Though they shared credit equally for inventing the airplane, their success came not from harmony but from passionate disagreements that lasted weeks or months. Their father, despite being a bishop, encouraged intellectual debate by including atheist books in his library. This foundation of constructive argument helped the brothers develop courage to fight for ideas and resilience to lose disagreements without losing resolve. Their heated propeller design arguments transformed into productive innovation as they shifted into scientist mode, focusing less on defending positions and more on understanding how different solutions might work. This approach led them to realize they were both wrong-all existing propeller designs were flawed. Their breakthrough came when they invented a revolutionary two-propeller system spinning in opposite directions, functioning like rotating wings. Research across thousands of teams shows that while relationship conflict (personal, emotional clashes) hurts performance, moderate task conflict (debates about ideas and opinions) early in a team's life can boost creativity and decision-making. At Pixar, director Brad Bird deliberately recruited "pirates" and "black sheep" for The Incredibles-disagreeable people who questioned established methods. Despite technical leaders claiming the film would require a decade and $500 million, Bird's team of misfits completed it in four years while lowering production costs. The key insight is that agreeableness is about seeking social harmony, not cognitive consensus-it's possible to disagree without being disagreeable. The Wright brothers exemplified this dynamic, with typically gentle Orville becoming "a good scrapper" when working with his more disagreeable brother Wilbur. Grant argues that rethinking requires a "challenge network" of trusted disagreeable people who question our assumptions and help overcome blind spots. In a great argument, an adversary isn't a foil but a propeller-with divergent perspectives allowing thinking to take flight rather than remaining grounded.

6장

Opening Minds Through Conversation

When trying to persuade others, expert negotiators use several key strategies that differ from average ones. They focus on finding common ground (devoting over a third of their preparation to it), present fewer but stronger reasons rather than diluting their case with weak points, avoid defend-attack spirals by expressing curiosity instead of dismissiveness, and ask more questions. In his debate against Project Debater (an IBM AI), Harish Natarajan won over the audience by emphasizing common ground. He began by stating "I think we disagree on far less than it may seem" and acknowledged their alignment on the problem of poverty before objecting to subsidies as a solution. This approach demonstrates that changing minds requires showing we're open to changing our own. By conceding good points, we signal we're not preachers or prosecutors with agendas, but scientists seeking truth. As Grant notes, "Being reasonable literally means that we can be reasoned with." When facing hostility, Grant learned to shift from viewing arguments as wars to treating them as dances. Rather than attacking or retreating when someone becomes hostile, he discovered the power of sidestepping-having a conversation about the conversation itself. After being heckled during a talk about creativity, Grant waited for a break, approached his critic privately, and asked what evidence would change their mind. This technique of showing tranquility in the face of anger often defuses tension. Grant now believes that having "strong opinions, weakly held" is a mistake-expressing uncertainty about strongly held views can be more effective. Research shows that moderate confidence is more persuasive than either high or low confidence in courtrooms. When we admit the holes in our arguments and focus on our strongest points, we invite others to join us as partners rather than opponents. As Grant concludes, "If we approach an argument as a war, there will be winners and losers. If we see it more as a dance, we can begin to choreograph a way forward."

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

싱크 어게인의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

7장

Breaking Down Tribal Barriers

At a Red Sox game, Grant was shocked when 37,000 fans erupted into a "Yankees suck!" chant despite playing against the Oakland A's. This tribal hatred runs so deep that Boston parents teach children to detest anything in pinstripes, and neuroscientists can observe Red Sox fans' brain regions linked to pleasure activate when seeing the Yankees fail. These rivalries extend beyond sports into business and politics, where people don't just identify with their group but actively "disidentify" with rivals, defining themselves by what they're not. This prejudice can lead people to harm or cheat rivals, as demonstrated by Ohio State students who were four times more likely to lie to University of Michigan students than to students from non-rival schools. How can we overcome such deep-seated prejudices? Grant tried several approaches with baseball fans. Creating an "overview effect" by having them reflect on their common identity as baseball lovers failed. Humanizing individual rival fans also fell short-when Red Sox fans read a personal story about a Yankees fan, they saw that person as "not your typical Yankees fan," an exception rather than a reason to reconsider their stereotypes. What finally worked was reflecting on the arbitrariness of sports rivalries. When Red Sox and Yankees fans considered how they would support the opposite team if born elsewhere, they selected less spicy hot sauce for rival fans, assigned easier math problems, and were less likely to view the rival's failure as their success. Dismantling stereotypes requires counterfactual thinking-imagining how our beliefs would differ under different circumstances. Questions like "How would your stereotypes be different if you'd been born of another race or in another culture?" help people recognize the arbitrary nature of their beliefs. Daryl Davis, a Black musician, demonstrates this approach when confronting white supremacists. When a KKK leader claimed Black people had "criminal genes," Davis cleverly turned the argument around, challenging him to name Black serial killers while listing numerous white ones. This planted doubt that eventually led the man to quit the KKK. By approaching supremacists with genuine curiosity, helping them see how their beliefs were inherited rather than reasoned, and building connection through shared interests like music, Davis has helped over 200 white supremacists leave hate groups. One former Imperial Wizard not only left the KKK but later asked Davis to be his daughter's godfather.

8장

The Power of Asking Questions

When Marie-Helene Etienne-Rousseau hesitated to vaccinate her premature son Tobie, neonatologist Arnaud Gagneur used a radically different approach than most vaccine advocates. Rather than preaching or prosecuting, he interviewed Marie-Helene with genuine curiosity, asking open-ended questions about her decision not to vaccinate. This approach-motivational interviewing-led Marie-Helene to not only vaccinate Tobie but also her older children, creating ripples in her anti-vaccination community. The process involves three key techniques: asking open-ended questions, engaging in reflective listening, and affirming the person's desire and ability to change. Studies show remarkable effectiveness-in Arnaud Gagneur's research, after just one motivational interviewing session, mothers were 9% more likely to fully vaccinate their children two years later. This approach has been validated in over a thousand controlled trials worldwide, successfully helping people stop smoking, overcome addictions, improve health behaviors, and even resolve conflicts between separated parents. Betty Bigombe demonstrated extraordinary listening when she hiked through Ugandan jungles to make peace with warlord Joseph Kony. Rather than preaching or prosecuting, she visited displaced people's camps, announcing she came not to lecture but to listen. Her patient, nonjudgmental attention earned their trust-they called her "Megu" (mother) despite her representing the government they viewed as oppressors. Research confirms that empathetic, attentive listening makes people less anxious and defensive, encouraging deeper exploration of their views. Great listeners make their audiences feel smart rather than trying to appear smart themselves. When vaccine-hesitant Marie-Helene expressed concerns about autism, Dr. Arnaud didn't bombard her with facts but asked about her sources, acknowledged information conflicts, and requested permission before sharing expertise. Listening offers others our scarcest gift: attention. It demonstrates respect and care, making people more willing to consider our perspective.

싱크 어게인에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

9장

Embracing Complexity in a Polarized World

Despite Al Gore's passionate advocacy in "An Inconvenient Truth," by 2018 only 59% of Americans saw climate change as a major threat. The binary framing of the issue as "believers vs. deniers" has contributed to polarization. In reality, there's a spectrum of at least six perspectives on climate change, from alarmed believers to dismissive deniers, with most Americans falling somewhere in between. Coleman's research shows that presenting complex issues as having many shades of gray rather than just two opposing sides dramatically improves the chances of finding common ground. In his experiment, when participants read an article framing gun control as a complex issue with multiple perspectives (rather than a binary debate), 100% of pairs were able to draft joint statements on abortion-compared to just 46% who read a "both-sides" article. This demonstrates how "complexifying" issues disrupts overconfidence cycles and spurs rethinking. When exposed to complexity, people assert fewer opinions, ask more questions, and show twice as much interest in finding common ground as defending their own views. Scientists effectively communicate complexity by including caveats and contingencies in their work. Research shows that news reports that acknowledge limitations of scientific studies maintain reader interest while promoting more flexible beliefs. In polarized discussions, perspective-taking (imagining others' views) often fails because we're terrible mind readers. Research shows this approach can actually make us less receptive to rethinking our positions and more confident in our inaccurate judgments. What works better is perspective-seeking: actually talking to people to understand their nuanced views. When Christian Cooper refused to make a simple judgment about a racist incident in Central Park, his nuanced assessment expressed mixed emotions and uncertainty, signaling his willingness to rethink the situation and encouraging others to do the same. By recognizing the complex power dynamics of systemic racism rather than making binary judgments, we can foster deeper discussions about justice.

10장

Rethinking Education and Organizations

Erin McCarthy, Wisconsin's Teacher of the Year, transforms social studies by cultivating curiosity and encouraging students to question established knowledge. Rather than presenting textbooks as absolute truth, she intentionally assigns outdated materials to demonstrate how historical narratives evolve. Through creative exercises-like writing textbook sections that marginalize boys to help them understand historical exclusion of women-she teaches students to think critically about whose perspectives are included or omitted. Her culminating assignment has eighth graders rewrite textbook chapters to include overlooked historical elements. Despite students reporting greater enjoyment and perceived effectiveness from lectures, research shows they actually learn more from active learning methods. In a physics experiment, students gained more knowledge from active problem-solving sessions than from passive lectures, even though they enjoyed the lectures more. Ron Berger, a public elementary school teacher who moonlighted as a carpenter, built his teaching philosophy around the constant revision of thinking. Rather than beginning with established knowledge, he presented students with "grapples"-problems to work through individually, then in pairs, and finally as a class. Berger embraced confusion as a catalyst for exploration and required multiple drafts of projects, creating a classroom culture where rethinking was celebrated, not ridiculed. "Quality means rethinking, reworking, and polishing," he explained. In organizations, psychological safety proves crucial for learning. When engineer-turned-professor Amy Edmondson studied medical errors, she discovered that teams with psychological safety reported more mistakes but actually made fewer-they simply felt safe enough to admit them. By acknowledging mistakes openly, they could diagnose root causes and prevent recurrences. At the Gates Foundation, experts feared strategy reviews with Bill Gates, whose broad knowledge could expose flaws in their work. This fear discouraged risk-taking, leading teams to propose safe, incremental strategies rather than bold experiments. A more effective approach emerged: managers sharing their past experiences with receiving feedback and their future development goals. By admitting imperfections, they normalized vulnerability and made a public commitment to remain open. In performance cultures, "best practices" can become frozen in time, preventing ongoing improvement. Process accountability-evaluating how carefully options are considered-creates deeper thinking. At Amazon, important decisions require six-page memos explaining problems, past approaches, and how proposed solutions serve customers.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

싱크 어게인의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

11장

Escaping Tunnel Vision in Life and Career

In confronting the question "What do you want to be when you grow up?", we often fall into identity foreclosure-settling prematurely on a career path without proper exploration. Through the story of his cousin Ryan, a neurosurgeon who followed a predetermined path despite growing doubts, Adam Grant illustrates how tunnel vision can lead us to the wrong destination. When we commit to plans that aren't working, we often double down rather than rethink-a pattern called escalation of commitment. This happens because we're constantly searching for self-justifications to soothe our egos and validate past decisions. Ironically, grit-the celebrated combination of passion and perseverance-can have a dark side when it comes to rethinking. Gritty people are more likely to overplay losing hands and persist in impossible tasks. Identity foreclosure affects all kinds of life plans, from career choices to relationships. Once committed, these plans become part of our identity, making it difficult to change course. Students who are most certain about their career paths at twenty often have the deepest regrets by thirty because they haven't done enough rethinking. The solution? Schedule regular career checkups by asking: When did you form your current aspirations, and how have you changed since? Have you reached a learning plateau? These questions activate rethinking cycles and help maintain humility about predicting your future. Though happiness is highly valued-from Bhutan's Gross National Happiness to America's Declaration of Independence-the pursuit of happiness can paradoxically lead to misery. Psychologists find that people who value happiness most are often less happy with their lives and more prone to depression. Rather than searching for jobs that make us happiest, we're better off pursuing work where we can learn and contribute most. Passions are often developed through effort, not discovered-entrepreneurs' enthusiasm grows with momentum and mastery. As we age, meaning becomes more important, and we find it in actions that benefit others. The evolution of career self-esteem typically progresses from "I'm not important" to "I'm important" to "I want to contribute to something important." Even without major career changes, we can find meaning through "job crafting"-like hospital custodian Candice Walker, who redefined her cleaning role to include emotionally supporting cancer patients, calling her workplace the "House of Hope." Our identities and lives are open systems-we don't need to stay tethered to old images of who we want to be. Rethinking our daily actions with humility, doubt, and curiosity can free us from familiar surroundings and former selves, leading to more fulfilling lives.

★★★★★

싱크 어게인 완독을 축하합니다

100만 명 이상의 학습자가 사랑합니다

“23일째 매일 사용하고 있어요. 이제 제 일상의 한 부분이 되었습니다.”

jayallen

싱크 어게인의 핵심 주제

intellectual humility
scientific mindset
cognitive bias
rethinking strategies
confident humility

싱크 어게인의 명언

Intelligence is traditionally viewed as the ability to think and learn. Yet in a turbulent world, there’s another set of cognitive skills that might matter even more: the ability to rethink and unlearn.
If knowledge is power, knowing what we don’t know is wisdom.
Intelligence doesn't guarantee adaptability.
Scientists don't defend existing knowledge-they revise it.
We all have blind spots that leave us 'blind to our blindness.'

싱크 어게인의 등장인물

Adam GrantAuthor and organizational psychologist at Wharton
Wagner DodgeSmokejumper who survived the Mann Gulch fire
Mike LazaridisBlackBerry co-founder who resisted touchscreens
Halla TomasdottirIcelandic presidential candidate

저자 소개

뉴욕 타임스 1위 베스트셀러인 *싱크 어게인(Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don’t Know)*의 저자 애덤 그랜트(Adam Grant)는 조직 심리학자이자 와튼 스쿨 교수로, 동기 부여, 창의성, 의사 결정에 접근하는 방식을 재정립한 인물로 명성이 높습니다.

심리학과 비즈니스 분야의 선구적인 목소리를 내는 그랜트의 저작은 가설을 재고하고, 지적 겸손을 수용하며, 혁신을 촉진하는 주제를 탐구합니다. 이러한 개념들은 그가 7년 연속 최우수 교수로 선정된 펜실베이니아 대학교에서의 연구에 기반을 두고 있습니다.

3,500만 회 이상의 조회수를 기록한 TED 강연과 인기 팟캐스트 WorkLife 및 ReThinking으로 잘 알려진 그랜트는 최첨단 과학을 실행 가능한 통찰력으로 변환해 전달합니다. 관대함에 관한 *기브 앤 테이크(Give and Take)*와 비순응성에 관한 *오리지널스(Originals)*를 포함한 그의 이전 저서들은 전 세계적으로 수백만 부가 판매되었으며, 본 플랫폼에서 싱크 어게인과 함께 요약본으로 만나보실 수 있습니다.

그랜트는 구글(Google) 및 NBA와 같은 조직의 자문을 맡고 있으며, 2021년 뉴욕 타임스에 기고한 '무기력(languishing)'에 관한 에세이는 그해 해당 매체에서 가장 많이 읽힌 기사가 되었습니다. 싱크 어게인은 45개 언어로 번역되어 인지적 유연성에 관한 현대의 고전으로서 그 입지를 굳혔습니다.

싱크 어게인 요약 다운로드

싱크 어게인 요약을 무료 PDF 또는 EPUB으로 받으세요. 인쇄하거나 오프라인에서 언제든 읽을 수 있습니다.

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

Originals

Adam Grant

Hidden Potential: The Science of Achieving Greater Things

Adam Grant

Think twice

Michael J. Mauboussin

Anatomy of a Breakthrough

Adam Alter

Rebel Ideas

Matthew Syed

Give and Take: Why Helping Others Drives Our Success

Adam M. Grant Ph.D.

Option B

Sheryl Sandberg & Adam Grant

Thinking 101

Woo-kyoung Ahn

이 책에 대한 FAQ

더 알아보기

학습 계획

Thinking, Fast and Slow: Decision Toolkit

In an era of information overload, understanding the mechanics of human judgment is a critical superpower for leaders and professionals. This toolkit is essential for anyone looking to minimize cognitive errors and master the psychological drivers behind every choice we make.

3 h 15 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Think like Nassim taleb

In an increasingly volatile world, traditional linear thinking often leads to catastrophic failure. This plan is essential for decision-makers, investors, and strategists who want to move beyond mere resilience and learn to profit from uncertainty.

5 h 30 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Resilient Mindset: From Overthinking to Action

In an era of constant distractions and high pressure, the ability to transition from paralysis to action is a critical professional skill. This plan is designed for high-performers and chronic overthinkers who want to build lasting resilience and navigate complex interpersonal dynamics with composure.

2 h•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Art of Detachment for Overthinkers

This plan is essential for high-achievers and chronic overthinkers who feel paralyzed by their own thoughts. It provides a roadmap to reclaim mental energy by mastering the balance between professional ambition and emotional detachment.

2 h 30 m•5 섹션

학습 계획

The Science of Better Judgment

In an era of information overload, the ability to think clearly is a competitive advantage. This plan is essential for leaders and professionals who need to minimize predictable errors and remain rational under pressure.

2 h 18 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

The Management Shadow: Taleb/Kahneman/Greene

In an era of radical uncertainty, traditional management frameworks often fail because they ignore human irrationality and the impact of rare events. This plan is designed for leaders and strategists who want to master the hidden psychological and systemic forces that govern success and power.

4 h 43 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Strategist's Guide to Clear Thinking

In an era of information overload, the ability to think structurally and argue ethically is a critical leadership asset. This guide is designed for professionals and decision-makers who need to strip away noise, validate evidence, and lead through high-level persuasion and debate.

2 h•4 섹션

학습 계획

Unshakable: The Mistake-Proof Mindset

This plan is essential for athletes who struggle with performance anxiety or the tendency to dwell on errors. It provides the mental tools needed to transition from self-doubt to instinctive, high-stakes execution.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

지금 바로 학습 여정을 시작하세요

11장

싱크 어게인

개요싱크 어게인 개요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

Challenging Certainty: The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know

The Mindsets That Shape Our Thinking

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Confidence Paradox

Finding Joy in Being Wrong

싱크 어게인에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Art of Productive Disagreement

Opening Minds Through Conversation

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Breaking Down Tribal Barriers

The Power of Asking Questions

싱크 어게인에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Embracing Complexity in a Polarized World

Rethinking Education and Organizations

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Escaping Tunnel Vision in Life and Career

싱크 어게인 완독을 축하합니다

싱크 어게인의 핵심 주제

싱크 어게인의 명언

싱크 어게인의 등장인물

저자 소개

싱크 어게인 요약 다운로드

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

이 책에 대한 FAQ

What is Think Again by Adam Grant about?

Who should read Think Again by Adam Grant?

Is Think Again worth reading?

What are the main concepts in Think Again?

더 알아보기

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

Challenging Certainty: The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know

The Mindsets That Shape Our Thinking

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Confidence Paradox

Finding Joy in Being Wrong

싱크 어게인에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Art of Productive Disagreement

Opening Minds Through Conversation

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Breaking Down Tribal Barriers

The Power of Asking Questions

싱크 어게인에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Embracing Complexity in a Polarized World

Rethinking Education and Organizations

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Escaping Tunnel Vision in Life and Career

싱크 어게인 완독을 축하합니다

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

더 알아보기

싱크 어게인 개요