What is *Static* by Amy Goodman about?

*Static* examines the collusion between government, corporate interests, and mainstream media to manipulate public perception, particularly during the Bush administration. Amy and David Goodman expose lies about war, torture, and media censorship while amplifying marginalized voices of activists and dissidents. The book combines investigative reporting with firsthand accounts to challenge power structures and advocate for grassroots democracy.

Who should read *Static* by Amy Goodman?

This book is ideal for readers seeking critical analysis of U.S. politics, media bias, and corporate influence. Activists, journalists, and students of political science will benefit from its unflinching critique of power and its celebration of dissent. Those interested in post-9/11 wars, government transparency, or independent journalism will find it particularly relevant.

Is *Static* by Amy Goodman worth reading?

Yes, *Static* remains a vital resource for understanding media complicity in state propaganda and wartime disinformation. Its blend of rigorous reporting and grassroots perspectives offers a counter-narrative to mainstream coverage. The book’s themes of accountability and resistance resonate in today’s climate of misinformation and corporate consolidation of media.

What are the main themes in *Static*?

- **Government deception**: Exposes fabricated justifications for war and illegal surveillance. - **Media as megaphone**: Critiques corporate media’s role in legitimizing state power. - **Grassroots resistance**: Highlights activists, soldiers, and families challenging official narratives. - **Free press advocacy**: Calls for independent journalism to counter propaganda.

How does *Static* critique mainstream media?

The Goodmans argue that corporate media outlets often parrot government talking points instead of holding power accountable. They document cases where journalists prioritized access over truth, such as uncritical reporting on the Iraq War’s false premises. The book contrasts this with independent media’s role in amplifying dissent.

What quotes from *Static* are most impactful?

- **“Breaking the sound barrier”**: Refers to elevating suppressed voices in public discourse. - **“Democracy is not a spectator sport”**: Emphasizes civic engagement to counter authoritarianism. - **“The media should be a mirror reflecting reality, not a megaphone for power”**: Condemns journalistic complacency.

How does *Static* relate to Amy Goodman’s other works?

Like *The Exception to the Rulers* and *Breaking the Sound Barrier*, *Static* continues Goodman’s focus on systemic corruption and media reform. It expands on her critiques of the Iraq War and torture programs while reinforcing her advocacy for independent journalism as a democratic safeguard.

Is *Static* by Amy Goodman still relevant in 2025?

Yes. Issues like corporate media consolidation, government surveillance, and wartime propaganda persist. The book’s warnings about eroding press freedoms and its blueprint for grassroots resistance remain urgent amid ongoing debates over disinformation and AI-generated content.

스태틱 요약

에이미 구드먼

4.06(382 Reviews)

스태틱 요약 개요

"정적(Static)"에서 에이미 굿맨과 데이비드 굿맨은 정부와 언론이 어떻게 진실을 조작하는지 폭로합니다. 2006년에 발표된 이 용기 있는 폭로서는 오늘날의 "가짜 뉴스" 시대를 예견했으며, 에이미에게 대안 노벨상을 안겨주었습니다. 당신의 주의가 분산되어 있는 동안, 침묵을 강요당했던 어떤 목소리들이 이에 맞서 싸우고 있을까요?

전달 방식을 선택하세요

다양한 학습 방식으로 스태틱 요약 살펴보기

스태틱의 같은 아이디어를 담았습니다. 나에게 맞는 목소리, 깊이, 속도를 고르고 언제든 바꿔 보세요.

1장

Media's Battlefield: Truth in the Age of Manufactured Consent

In a world increasingly dominated by corporate media conglomerates and government propaganda, Amy Goodman's "Static" stands as a defiant beacon of journalistic integrity. Published during the height of the Iraq War, this explosive expose became an instant New York Times bestseller, resonating with readers hungry for unfiltered truth. Celebrities from Susan Sarandon to Michael Moore have championed Goodman's fearless reporting, while her daily program "Democracy Now!" has grown from a small radio show to a multimedia phenomenon broadcast on over 500 stations worldwide. What makes this book particularly compelling is its timing - released when mainstream media was at its most compliant with power, "Static" dared to document the machinery of deception operating at the highest levels of government and media. As one reviewer noted, "In an era when journalists were either embedded with troops or in bed with power, Goodman remained defiantly unembedded."

2장

The Propaganda Machine: Manufacturing Consent for War

The Bush administration's propaganda apparatus extended far beyond Iraq, operating as a sophisticated psychological warfare operation targeting both foreign and domestic audiences. Despite legal prohibitions against using foreign propaganda on American citizens, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld dismissed these concerns with chilling candor: "When you speak today, there's no one audience." Pentagon briefings explicitly identified the American "home audience" as targets for information warfare. This propaganda machine worked with remarkable efficiency. In Iraq, U.S. officials planted stories in local newspapers with headlines like "IRAQI ARMY DEFEATS TERRORISM" alongside articles claiming Iraqi security forces were "a viable fighting force" - even as military leaders privately acknowledged no Iraqi battalions could operate independently. Meanwhile, the administration deliberately inflated Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's role to falsely connect Saddam Hussein with 9/11 and portray the insurgency as foreign-led. "Villainize Zarqawi/leverage xenophobia response," stated one military briefing with stunning frankness. When U.S. psychological operations officers leaked a supposed Zarqawi letter to the New York Times, General Mark Kimmitt later boasted it was "the most successful information campaign to date." The government's "information war" included tracking journalists' phone calls to identify whistleblowers, with Attorney General Alberto Gonzales threatening prosecution for publishing classified information. The message was unmistakable: either participate in the administration's narrative or become its target. Why did this propaganda succeed? Because the corporate media, compromised by its own complicity in promoting administration lies, abandoned its watchdog role. Celebrity journalists like Judith Miller and Bob Woodward, once crusading reporters, became willing conduits for government disinformation. For three years, the New York Times danced to the administration's tune, with Miller's dispatches serving as a conveyor belt for fabrications from Iraqi exiles connected to the CIA-created Iraqi National Congress. Have you ever wondered why certain perspectives dominate our news while others remain invisible? The answer lies in what media critics call "the access of evil" - journalists trading truth for access, creating an illusion of balanced coverage that viewers mistake for reality.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

스태틱 요약의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

3장

The Access of Evil: How Media Surrenders Its Independence

Today's corporate media suffers from a fundamental corruption: journalists trade truth for access, creating an illusion of news that viewers mistake for reality. This extends to the one-sided debates dominating network and cable news. During Bush's first term, 69 percent of journalists appearing on Sunday shows were conservatives, and 58 percent of all guests were Republicans. In the critical months before the Iraq invasion, less than 1 percent of "experts" appearing on major networks represented antiwar organizations. This isn't "mainstream" media - it's extreme media that cheerleads for war while marginalizing dissent. Instead of learning what's actually happening, we get static - a veil of distortion, lies, omissions and half-truths obscuring reality. As bodies piled up in Iraq and New Orleans, many wondered where journalism had gone wrong. The New York Times' handling of its NSA wiretapping story perfectly illustrates this surrender of journalistic independence. In December 2005, the Times published James Risen and Eric Lichtblau's explosive report revealing the Bush administration's illegal wiretapping of U.S. citizens. But buried in the ninth paragraph was an astonishing admission: the Times had delayed publication for a full year at the White House's request - meaning they withheld this vital information until after Bush's 2004 reelection. Editor Bill Keller's explanation defied journalistic principles: administration officials had "assured" Times editors that "legal checks" were in place. This from the same regime that had declared torture, preemptive war, and offshore gulags legal. The story was finally published only because Risen planned to reveal it in an upcoming book, forcing the paper's hand. What we need instead is media that creates static of another kind: "criticism, opposition, or unwanted interference." People aren't waiting for corporate media to reform - they're building this alternative media now through blogs, independent media centers, and citizen journalism. Democracy Now! exemplifies this tradition, bringing forth dissidents, activists, whistleblowers and those most affected by power's decisions. With lives and freedoms at stake, we need fiercely independent journalism that informs rather than deceives.

4장

America's Secret Gulag: Extraordinary Rendition and Torture

Maher Arar's nightmare began innocently enough. The 33-year-old Canadian computer engineer was changing planes at JFK Airport when he was detained, interrogated for hours without legal counsel, and repeatedly denied his rights because he wasn't an American citizen. Despite his desperate protests that he would be tortured if sent to Syria, U.S. officials ignored him. They chained him, flew him on a CIA "torture taxi" to Jordan where he was beaten, then delivered him to Syrian authorities. In Syria, he was brutally tortured with cable beatings and imprisoned in what he described as "an underground grave" - a cell just three feet wide, six feet deep, and seven feet high, with rats and no proper sanitation. He remained in this "torture chamber" for over ten months. After Canadian government intervention, Arar was finally released without charges in October 2003. Years later, he still suffers nightmares, fears flying, and struggles with the "terrorist" label that destroyed his career. "I never thought human beings could treat other human beings like that," he reflected. Arar wasn't an isolated case but part of a systematic program called "extraordinary rendition" that began under Clinton but expanded dramatically after 9/11. Hundreds of suspects were kidnapped globally and sent to countries known for torture. When Arar sued U.S. officials including John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller, Judge David Trager dismissed the case, ruling that even decisions leading to torture are "most appropriately reserved to the Executive and Legislative branches" when national security is involved. This judicial capitulation prompted Center for Constitutional Rights president Michael Ratner to observe that the idea of torture as legitimate was "seeping into not just the administration and the executive, [but] into the judiciary." As Arar himself noted, "When a court will not act because of 'national security,' there is no longer any difference between the West and the Third World." The CIA's extraordinary rendition program operated with shocking impunity. In Milan, Italy, CIA agents kidnapped Egyptian cleric Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr (Abu Omar) off the street in broad daylight. While the agents lived lavishly in luxury hotels, Abu Omar was subjected to brutal torture in Egypt. The CIA deliberately misled Italian authorities about his whereabouts, claiming he had fled to the Balkans. Italian prosecutors eventually issued arrest warrants for 22 CIA operatives, marking the first time a foreign government attempted to prosecute U.S. intelligence agents. When Washington Post reporter Dana Priest exposed the CIA's secret prison network in Eastern Europe, her newspaper withheld the specific countries involved at the request of "senior U.S. officials." This decision to withhold crucial information drew criticism from media watchdogs who argued that exposing abuse is precisely what a free press should do. The consequences of such media complicity are not theoretical - in 1961, both The New Republic and The New York Times withheld crucial information about the CIA's planned Bay of Pigs invasion at the Kennedy administration's request. After the disastrous operation left 114 invaders dead and nearly 1,200 captured, President Kennedy himself lamented, "If you had printed more about the operation, you would have saved us from a colossal mistake."

스태틱 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

5장

Watching You: The Surveillance State Unleashed

In 1971, during another era of government deception and an unpopular foreign war, anonymous activists calling themselves the "Citizens' Commission to Investigate the FBI" broke into an FBI office in Media, Pennsylvania, stealing over a thousand documents. These were mailed to various news outlets, revealing the existence of COINTELPRO - the FBI's counterintelligence program designed to "neutralize" domestic political groups. Despite Attorney General John Mitchell's pressure to suppress the story, the Washington Post published the revelations, exposing how the FBI recruited local officials to spy on campus and black activist groups. Three decades later, the federal government has resumed spying on innocent Americans exercising their free speech rights. Sarah Bardwell experienced this firsthand when FBI agents and Denver police in SWAT gear showed up at her door in 2004, claiming to be investigating "suspected terrorists" regarding potential actions at upcoming political conventions. When Bardwell and her roommates declined to answer questions, agents took notes on items in their home and threatened "more intrusive effort" for their "noncooperation." Two years later, she admitted, "We don't talk about politics anymore. There's been a toning down of everything we do." The Thomas Merton Center in Pittsburgh became a target of an FBI "international terrorism investigation" simply for opposing the Iraq War. Secret FBI files obtained by the ACLU revealed the center was monitored for handing out antiwar leaflets, with one memo noting that an activist "appeared to be of Middle Eastern descent." Tim Vining, the center's former director, explained they were targeted for trying to build relationships with the Muslim community. Pentagon spies even infiltrated a meeting at a Quaker Meeting House in Florida where activists were planning a protest against military recruiters in high schools. This surveillance was part of a secret Pentagon database tracking "threats," which monitored dozens of peaceful antiwar protests, including demonstrations by military families. The most far-reaching surveillance program was the NSA's warrantless eavesdropping, exposed by the New York Times in December 2005 - after the paper had withheld the story for over a year at the White House's request. AT&T whistleblower Mark Klein revealed the company built secret eavesdropping rooms in their main switching centers. NSA whistleblower Russell Tice explained that bypassing the FISA court suggested the program was "a lot bigger" than acknowledged - likely "a vacuum cleaner approach." Despite administration claims that the program "saved thousands of lives," virtually all NSA tips led to dead ends or innocent Americans, with FBI agents joking that new domestic terrorism tips meant more "calls to Pizza Hut." As Russell Tice, a lifelong Republican who voted for Bush, warned Congress: "The freedom of the American people cannot be protected when our constitutional liberties are ignored and our nation has decayed into a police state."

6장

Manufacturing Reality: Fake News and Paid Propaganda

By 2006, the Bush administration faced numerous scandals, policy failures and PR disasters - from the Iraq quagmire to Hurricane Katrina's devastation. With 70% of Americans disapproving of their president, the administration turned to propaganda, spending $1.6 billion on advertising and public relations between 2003-2005 to promote its policies. Creating the illusion of a free Iraqi media was a priority. The Pentagon paid the Lincoln Group to plant propaganda in Iraqi newspapers while the U.S.-backed Al-Sabah newspaper became a dangerous place for Iraqi journalists to work. Staff received death threats and faced bombing attempts, eventually walking out in protest over lack of editorial independence. The Harris corporation, which landed the media contract despite little journalism experience, had strong Republican Party ties and donated heavily to GOP candidates. Meanwhile, the Pentagon's propaganda campaign violated its own directive prohibiting psychological operations targeting U.S. media. In one instance, a Marine spokesperson appeared on CNN announcing a Fallujah invasion that wouldn't begin for weeks - an elaborate psychological operation. The Iraqi National Congress, paid $340,000 monthly by the Defense Department, planted false stories about WMDs and fabricated a meeting between Saddam Hussein and bin Laden. Domestically, the Bush administration created an alternate reality through fake television news segments distributed to local stations. Government agencies spent $250 million producing hundreds of these segments featuring pseudo-reporters delivering propaganda about Medicare, the Transportation Security Administration, and the Iraq War. The Government Accountability Office labeled these "covert propaganda" and declared them illegal, but the White House instructed agencies to disregard these findings. The propaganda extended to paying pundits. Armstrong Williams received $240,000 to promote the No Child Left Behind Act, promising to be a "one-stop propaganda shop" delivering "favorable commentaries." Columnist Maggie Gallagher received $41,500 from HHS and the Justice Department to promote Bush's marriage initiatives while writing supportive columns without disclosure. Conservative columnist Mike McManus got $10,000 for similar work. When real journalists became troublesome, the administration employed fake ones. Jeff Gannon (actually James Guckert), a male escort and webmaster of gay porn sites, obtained White House press credentials before publishing his first article for the Republican-affiliated Talon News/GOPUSA. At a rare presidential press conference, Bush called on Gannon who delivered a softball question attacking Democrats. Meanwhile, legitimate journalists faced barriers. New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd was initially denied press credentials, while Helen Thomas, dean of the White House press corps who had covered presidents since Kennedy, was moved to the back row and rarely called upon after asking challenging questions about Iraq. These propaganda efforts succeeded in confusing the public. A December 2005 Harris poll showed many Americans still believed discredited justifications for invading Iraq: 41% believed Saddam Hussein had "strong links to al Qaeda," 22% thought he helped plan 9/11, and 26% believed Iraq had WMDs when invaded. Among U.S. troops, 90% believed the mission was "to retaliate for Saddam's role in the 9/11 attacks."

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

스태틱 요약의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

7장

The Mighty Wurlitzer: CIA's Media Manipulation

The relationship between corporate media and the U.S. government has been systematically cultivated for decades. From the 1950s to the 1970s, over 400 American journalists secretly worked for the CIA in what was sometimes called "Operation Mockingbird." At its peak in the 1960s, this propaganda network included more than 800 news organizations and individuals, with America's top media executives willingly participating in the deception. Beyond merely influencing journalists, the CIA created an entire parallel universe of Agency-backed media worldwide. The CIA owned or subsidized over fifty media outlets, mostly overseas. The Agency employed at least a dozen full-time agents in American news organizations, often with management's knowledge, while another dozen foreign news organizations were infiltrated by paid CIA agents. About twenty-two American news organizations employed journalists who simultaneously worked for the CIA, and roughly a dozen American publishing houses printed more than 1,000 CIA-produced or subsidized books. Though legally prohibited from disseminating propaganda within the United States, the CIA accepted that some of its disinformation would inevitably reach American audiences as "blowback" or "domestic fallout." Some former employees even admitted that certain propaganda efforts, especially during the Vietnam War, were carried out with their eventual U.S. impact in mind. The Mighty Wurlitzer continues operating today, though in evolved forms. Modern journalists like former New York Times reporter Judith Miller serve government interests without direct payment. Miller received Pentagon security clearance during the Iraq War that gave her access to classified information but restricted her from discussing sensitive matters with her editors. Her apocalyptic and ultimately false reporting about Iraq's WMDs received prominent placement in America's most influential newspaper. Craig Pyes, who worked with Miller on an al Qaeda series, complained to Times editors in 2000: "She is an advocate... She has turned in a draft... that is little more than dictation from government sources... filled with unproven assertions and factual inaccuracies." As a senior CIA official presciently noted in 1977: "The pendulum will swing, and someday we'll be recruiting journalists again... I see a lot of them, and I know they're ripe for the plucking."

8장

Voices of Hope and Resistance

In times of universal deceit, truth-telling becomes revolutionary. Despite facing war, corruption, and state-sanctioned torture, independent thinkers, activists, and journalists worldwide are speaking truth to power. Democracy Now! breaks the sound barrier by broadcasting diverse, dissenting voices - from the powerful to the grassroots, the celebrated to the marginalized. Alice Walker, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of The Color Purple, reflects on her arrest at an anti-Iraq War protest outside the White House: "When you're able to gather your own forces and deal with your own fears... and you gather with all of the other people who are just as small as you are, but you're together." Though war may never end externally, Walker sees anti-war activism as crucial for internal peace: "What we're trying to do is stop it in ourselves." South African journalist Allister Sparks, who gained fame exposing apartheid abuses, identifies a critical media problem: the "elite consensus" where journalists become embedded with their sources. Senior reporters covering specific beats become part of the elite they report on - socializing with sources, thinking like them, and growing dependent on maintaining access. This dependency makes journalists reluctant to challenge official narratives: "The last thing they want to do is give offense to the source by suggesting that the source is not telling the truth." Amira Hass, daughter of a Holocaust survivor and the only Jewish Israeli journalist living in Palestinian territories, explains her decision to immerse herself in occupied communities: "I wanted to experience life under occupation day by day and night by night, not just on visits." Her decade of reporting from Gaza and the West Bank has earned mixed reactions - some Israelis call her a traitor while military officials acknowledge her accuracy. Robert Fisk of the London Independent argues that media's refusal to show the true horrors of war enables more conflicts. "If you saw what I saw when I go to wars-with civilians or the wounded in hospitals-you would never, ever dream of supporting a war again," he explains. Fisk criticizes how journalists seek proximity to power rather than challenging it, emphasizing journalists must challenge power consistently, "even if the politicians and the prime minister, even if your readers hate you." Arundhati Roy, acclaimed Indian author and activist, delivered a powerful speech at Riverside Church in New York six weeks after the Iraq invasion. Speaking as "a subject of the American Empire," she criticized the U.S. government's self-granted right to wage war at will, using "Democracy" as its "sly new war cry." Roy argued that Americans are paying for these "liberation" wars with their own freedoms. She urged Americans to confront empire by isolating and disabling its working parts, supporting independent media, and joining the battle in millions: "If you join the battle, not in your hundreds of thousands, but in your millions, you will be greeted joyously by the rest of the world... History is giving you the chance. Seize the time."

스태틱 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

9장

Breaking Through the Static

The battle for truth in our media landscape continues today with mounting intensity. As corporate consolidation accelerates - with just six major conglomerates now controlling 90% of American media - and government propaganda grows more sophisticated through data analytics and targeted messaging, the need for independent, uncompromising journalism has never been more critical. The voices highlighted in "Static" remind us that challenging power is not just possible but essential for democracy's survival in an era of information warfare. When journalists trade access for truth - like the widespread self-censorship during the Iraq War - when media companies prioritize profit over public interest through clickbait and sensationalism, when government officials manipulate information with impunity through selective leaks and strategic misinformation - we all lose. The cost is measured not just in misleading headlines but in eroded public trust and weakened democratic institutions. Yet the examples of courage throughout this book demonstrate that individuals can make a profound difference. From Edward Snowden exposing mass surveillance programs to Chelsea Manning revealing military misconduct, from independent journalists like Amy Goodman reporting from Standing Rock to citizen journalists documenting police brutality - these are the forces that break through the static of manufactured consent. The digital age has created new challenges but also new opportunities for truth-telling. Social media platforms can amplify independent voices while simultaneously spreading misinformation. Encryption tools protect sources while surveillance technology threatens them. As we navigate this increasingly complex information environment, perhaps the most important lesson is that media is not something that happens to us - it's something we actively participate in creating. By supporting independent journalism through subscriptions and donations, by questioning official narratives through fact-checking and research, by amplifying marginalized voices through sharing and engagement, and by speaking truth to power in our own communities and workplaces, we contribute to a more democratic media landscape. The static may be loud - amplified by algorithmic echo chambers, corporate interests, and state propaganda - but the truth is louder still. We see this in the impact of investigative reporting that exposes corruption, in viral videos that capture injustice, in grassroots movements that shift public discourse. And in that truth, documented and defended by countless brave individuals, lies our hope for a more just and peaceful world. The future of media depends not on corporate boardrooms or government agencies, but on ordinary people committed to seeking and sharing truth.

★★★★★

스태틱 요약 완독을 축하합니다

“23일째 매일 사용하고 있어요. 이제 제 일상의 한 부분이 되었습니다.”

jayallen

스태틱 요약의 핵심 주제

corporate media bias
manufactured consent
independent journalism
government propaganda
information warfare

스태틱 요약의 명문장

When a court will not act because of 'national security,' there is no longer any difference between the West and the Third World.

스태틱 요약의 등장인물

Amy GoodmanAuthor and host of Democracy Now!
Donald RumsfeldDefense Secretary who managed war propaganda
Judith MillerJournalist used as a conduit for disinformation
Bill KellerNew York Times editor who delayed the NSA story
Maher ArarCanadian engineer subjected to rendition

저자 소개

수상 경력에 빛나는 저널리스트이자 *Democracy Now!*의 진행자인 에이미 굿맨(Amy Goodman)은 기업 미디어와 정치 권력 구조에 대한 날카로운 비판을 담은 저서, **정적: 정부의 거짓말쟁이들, 미디어 치어리더들, 그리고 이에 맞서 싸우는 사람들(Static: Government Liars, Media Cheerleaders, and the People Who Fight Back)**의 공동 저자입니다.

하버드 대학에서 인류학을 전공하고 조사 전문 기자가 된 굿맨의 경력은 수십 년에 걸쳐 정부의 부패, 기업의 부정행위, 그리고 주류 언론이 외면한 풀뿌리 운동을 폭로해 왔습니다. 전 세계 1,400개 방송국을 통해 송출되는 *Democracy Now!*의 총괄 프로듀서이자 진행자로서 그녀가 보여준 선구적인 작업은 독립 저널리즘 분야에서 그녀의 권위를 확고히 하고 있습니다.

**통치자들에 대한 예외(The Exception to the Rulers)**와 **Democracy Now!: 미국을 변화시키는 운동들을 취재한 20년(Democracy Now!: Twenty Years Covering the Movements Changing America)**을 포함한 굿맨의 또 다른 뉴욕 타임즈 베스트셀러들은 체제적 불평등과 활동가들의 회복력을 더욱 심도 있게 분석합니다. '바른 살림상(Right Livelihood Award)'과 하버드 대학의 'I.F. 스톤 저널리즘 독립상'을 수상한 굿맨의 저술은 현장 보도와 예리한 분석을 결합하여 소외된 목소리를 증폭시킵니다.

*정적(Static)*은 권력에 도전하고 뉴스의 책무성을 재정의하려는 그녀의 수십 년에 걸친 사명을 반영하며, 진보 미디어의 핵심 인물로서 그녀의 위상을 공고히 합니다.

스태틱 요약 다운로드

스태틱 요약을 무료 PDF 또는 EPUB으로 받으세요. 인쇄하거나 오프라인에서 언제든 읽을 수 있습니다.

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

The silenced majority

Amy Goodman & Denis Moynihan

Unfreedom of the Press

Mark Levin

The War on Journalism

Andrew Fowler

Democracy Awakening

Heather Cox Richardson

Republic of Lies

Anna Merlan

Autocracy, Inc

Anne Applebaum

I Have Nothing to Hide

Heidi Boghosian

Blowout

Rachel Maddow

스태틱 요약에 관한 자주 묻는 질문

이 학습 계획의 일부

학습 계획

Learn about John Kiriakou

3 h 36 m•3 에피소드

더 알아보기

학습 계획

Truth, Trust, and Public Reason

In an era of deep polarization and digital manipulation, understanding the architecture of truth is a vital survival skill. This plan is designed for citizens, professionals, and students who want to navigate modern information ecosystems with skepticism and intellectual integrity.

1 h 12 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Jon Stewart and the Satiric Corrective

This plan explores how satire functions as a vital corrective to media distortion and political theater. It is ideal for media professionals, leaders, and aspiring creators who want to master the art of high-stakes creative management and truth-telling through humor.

1 h 15 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Dismantle Fallacies and Debate Unshakable

In an era of misinformation and polarized discourse, the ability to think critically is a vital survival skill. This plan is designed for professionals, activists, and students who need to defend their ideas against manipulative rhetoric and master the art of persuasive communication.

1 h 45 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

The Shadow Governance of Gossip

This plan is essential for sociologists, community leaders, and professionals navigating complex organizational politics. It reclaims gossip as a sophisticated survival mechanism and a primary tool for informal governance in both physical and digital spaces.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Combat logical fallacies

In an era of misinformation, the ability to think critically is a vital survival skill. This plan is designed for professionals, students, and citizens who want to sharpen their decision-making and resist manipulation in complex public and private debates.

5 h 25 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Gramsci y la fábrica del consenso

Este plan es esencial para comprender cómo se moldea nuestra percepción de la realidad a través de la cultura y la tecnología. Es ideal para estudiantes de ciencias sociales, comunicadores y ciudadanos interesados en desmantelar las narrativas invisibles del poder.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

The Dizziness of Freedom

This learning plan is designed for individuals feeling paralyzed by modern life's endless choices or lost in societal expectations. It provides a roadmap for anyone seeking to reclaim their agency and transition from passive conformity to an authentic, self-determined existence.

2 h•4 섹션

학습 계획

Surviving the Algorithmic Age

In an era where algorithms dictate our reality, understanding the mechanics of digital influence is essential for mental autonomy. This plan is designed for students, professionals, and daily internet users who want to move beyond passive scrolling and master their information environment.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 제작 | 샌프란시스코에서 개발

BeFreed는 호기심 넘치는 글로벌 커뮤니티를 하나로 연결합니다

4.7

평균 평점

앱 평가 7.84천 개 이상

BeFreed 커뮤니티

정말이지 아직 앱을 다 써 보지도 않았는데, 며칠 써 본 것만으로도 깊은 인상을 받았어요… BeFreed는 제가 써 본 어떤 학습 앱과도 차원이 달라요. 몰입감이 엄청나고 집중력도 실제로 좋아져서, 스마트폰을 하염없이 스크롤하는 분들께 딱이에요!

@ladyInfinity

정확히 23일 전에 BeFreed를 구입했는데, 그날부터 하루도 빠짐없이 쓰고 있어요. 제 일상 업무 흐름과 학습 습관에 완전히 자리 잡았어요.

@jayallen

솔직히 이 앱은 제 기대를 전부 뛰어넘었어요. 어떤 주제든 오디오로 만들어 달라고 할 수 있고, 결과물이 놀라워요. 제 전문 분야는 심리치료 쪽이고 여러 학문이 얽혀 있는데도 답변이 아주 정확해요.

@Raguipa

제일 고마운 건 스크롤하는 시간이 확 줄었다는 거예요. 검색하는 시간은 줄고 흡수하는 시간은 늘었어요. 오디오북 전권, 팟캐스트, 학습 플랜의 조합이 정말 훌륭해요.

@colonyofcreatorsNGO

저는 24년째 PhotoReading 속진 학습 강사로 일하고 있어요… 책과 독서, 배움이 제 전문인데, BeFreed는 정보를 소화하기 쉽게 전달하는 혁신적인 방식을 정말 잘 구현했어요.

@BeFreed user

단순한 책 요약 앱이 아니에요. '재미' 스타일을 써 봤는데, 전통적인 방식보다 훨씬 나은 요약이고 아이디어를 이해하기도 쉬워요. 이것만으로도 값어치를 해요.

@austinakon

이 앱이 정말 좋아요. 며칠 써 봤는데 듣는 걸 멈출 수가 없어요. 시작하기에 이보다 좋을 수 없어요.

@jcrules328

정말 마음에 들어요. 한 달 정도 써 봤는데 숨은 보석을 찾은 기분이에요. BeFreed로 제가 원하는 주제를 직접 만들 수 있어서 좋고, 목소리도 훌륭한 데다 내레이션 선택지가 무궁무진해요.

@DanielCZ

정말이지 아직 앱을 다 써 보지도 않았는데, 며칠 써 본 것만으로도 깊은 인상을 받았어요… BeFreed는 제가 써 본 어떤 학습 앱과도 차원이 달라요. 몰입감이 엄청나고 집중력도 실제로 좋아져서, 스마트폰을 하염없이 스크롤하는 분들께 딱이에요!

@ladyInfinity

정확히 23일 전에 BeFreed를 구입했는데, 그날부터 하루도 빠짐없이 쓰고 있어요. 제 일상 업무 흐름과 학습 습관에 완전히 자리 잡았어요.

@jayallen

솔직히 이 앱은 제 기대를 전부 뛰어넘었어요. 어떤 주제든 오디오로 만들어 달라고 할 수 있고, 결과물이 놀라워요. 제 전문 분야는 심리치료 쪽이고 여러 학문이 얽혀 있는데도 답변이 아주 정확해요.

@Raguipa

제일 고마운 건 스크롤하는 시간이 확 줄었다는 거예요. 검색하는 시간은 줄고 흡수하는 시간은 늘었어요. 오디오북 전권, 팟캐스트, 학습 플랜의 조합이 정말 훌륭해요.

@colonyofcreatorsNGO

저는 24년째 PhotoReading 속진 학습 강사로 일하고 있어요… 책과 독서, 배움이 제 전문인데, BeFreed는 정보를 소화하기 쉽게 전달하는 혁신적인 방식을 정말 잘 구현했어요.

@BeFreed user

단순한 책 요약 앱이 아니에요. '재미' 스타일을 써 봤는데, 전통적인 방식보다 훨씬 나은 요약이고 아이디어를 이해하기도 쉬워요. 이것만으로도 값어치를 해요.

@austinakon

이 앱이 정말 좋아요. 며칠 써 봤는데 듣는 걸 멈출 수가 없어요. 시작하기에 이보다 좋을 수 없어요.

@jcrules328

정말 마음에 들어요. 한 달 정도 써 봤는데 숨은 보석을 찾은 기분이에요. BeFreed로 제가 원하는 주제를 직접 만들 수 있어서 좋고, 목소리도 훌륭한 데다 내레이션 선택지가 무궁무진해요.

@DanielCZ

유용한 정보와 아이디어를 8~15분짜리 팟캐스트 스타일 오디오로 압축해서 들을 수 있다는 게 정말 좋아요. 원래 팟캐스트는 군더더기가 많아서 안 좋아했는데, 여기는 그걸 싹 걷어냈어요.

@BeFreed user

박사 과정을 마무리하는 중이라 낯선 자료를 많이 읽어야 해요… BeFreed에서는 프롬프트만 입력하면 앱이 자료를 찾아서 오디오 팟캐스트로 만들어 줘요. BeFreed의 과정이 NotebookLM보다 더 매끄럽게 느껴져요.

@Brad

아침을 준비하거나 산책하거나 출퇴근할 때 들을 것을 YouTube에서 자주 찾곤 했는데, BeFreed는 광고도 군더더기도 없이 훨씬 더 딱 맞는 걸 들려줘요!

@BeFreed user

이 플랫폼의 가장 큰 장점은 활용도예요. 다루지 못하는 주제가 말 그대로 하나도 없어요. 무엇을 던져도 다 소화해요… 제한이 전혀 없으면서 약속을 실제로 지키는 학습 도구는 정말 드물어요.

@jayallen

BeFreed는 환상적이에요. 디자인이 편해서 헤매는 시간은 줄고 배우는 시간은 늘었어요. 오디오북, 팟캐스트, 학습 플랜의 조합은 천재적이에요. 제 하루가 완전히 달라졌어요.

@BeFreed user

처음엔 이탈리아어로 팟캐스트를 만드는 방법을 이해하는 데 시간이 좀 걸렸는데, 알고 나니까 — 와! 정말 대단해요! 어떤 주제든 설명해 달라고 하면 정말 똑똑하게 잘 설명해 줘요!

@matteo77

BeFreed는 제가 매일 쓰는 오디오북 앱이 됐어요… 제일 마음에 드는 건 텍스트를 넣으면 이동 중에도 들을 수 있는 오디오로 만들어 준다는 점이에요.

@kotanzu1

유용한 정보와 아이디어를 8~15분짜리 팟캐스트 스타일 오디오로 압축해서 들을 수 있다는 게 정말 좋아요. 원래 팟캐스트는 군더더기가 많아서 안 좋아했는데, 여기는 그걸 싹 걷어냈어요.

@BeFreed user

박사 과정을 마무리하는 중이라 낯선 자료를 많이 읽어야 해요… BeFreed에서는 프롬프트만 입력하면 앱이 자료를 찾아서 오디오 팟캐스트로 만들어 줘요. BeFreed의 과정이 NotebookLM보다 더 매끄럽게 느껴져요.

@Brad

아침을 준비하거나 산책하거나 출퇴근할 때 들을 것을 YouTube에서 자주 찾곤 했는데, BeFreed는 광고도 군더더기도 없이 훨씬 더 딱 맞는 걸 들려줘요!

@BeFreed user

이 플랫폼의 가장 큰 장점은 활용도예요. 다루지 못하는 주제가 말 그대로 하나도 없어요. 무엇을 던져도 다 소화해요… 제한이 전혀 없으면서 약속을 실제로 지키는 학습 도구는 정말 드물어요.

@jayallen

BeFreed는 환상적이에요. 디자인이 편해서 헤매는 시간은 줄고 배우는 시간은 늘었어요. 오디오북, 팟캐스트, 학습 플랜의 조합은 천재적이에요. 제 하루가 완전히 달라졌어요.

@BeFreed user

처음엔 이탈리아어로 팟캐스트를 만드는 방법을 이해하는 데 시간이 좀 걸렸는데, 알고 나니까 — 와! 정말 대단해요! 어떤 주제든 설명해 달라고 하면 정말 똑똑하게 잘 설명해 줘요!

@matteo77

BeFreed는 제가 매일 쓰는 오디오북 앱이 됐어요… 제일 마음에 드는 건 텍스트를 넣으면 이동 중에도 들을 수 있는 오디오로 만들어 준다는 점이에요.

@kotanzu1

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

지금 바로 학습 여정을 시작하세요

6장

스태틱 요약

스태틱 요약 개요

다양한 학습 방식으로 스태틱 요약 살펴보기

Media's Battlefield: Truth in the Age of Manufactured Consent

The Propaganda Machine: Manufacturing Consent for War

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Access of Evil: How Media Surrenders Its Independence

America's Secret Gulag: Extraordinary Rendition and Torture

스태틱 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Watching You: The Surveillance State Unleashed

Manufacturing Reality: Fake News and Paid Propaganda

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Mighty Wurlitzer: CIA's Media Manipulation

Voices of Hope and Resistance

스태틱 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Breaking Through the Static

스태틱 요약 완독을 축하합니다

스태틱 요약의 핵심 주제

스태틱 요약의 명문장

스태틱 요약의 등장인물

저자 소개

스태틱 요약 다운로드

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

스태틱 요약에 관한 자주 묻는 질문

What is Static by Amy Goodman about?

Who should read Static by Amy Goodman?

Is Static by Amy Goodman worth reading?

What are the main themes in Static?

이 학습 계획의 일부

Learn about John Kiriakou

더 알아보기

BeFreed는 호기심 넘치는 글로벌 커뮤니티를 하나로 연결합니다

다양한 학습 방식으로 스태틱 요약 살펴보기

Media's Battlefield: Truth in the Age of Manufactured Consent

The Propaganda Machine: Manufacturing Consent for War

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Access of Evil: How Media Surrenders Its Independence

America's Secret Gulag: Extraordinary Rendition and Torture

스태틱 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Watching You: The Surveillance State Unleashed

Manufacturing Reality: Fake News and Paid Propaganda

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Mighty Wurlitzer: CIA's Media Manipulation

Voices of Hope and Resistance

스태틱 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Breaking Through the Static

스태틱 요약 완독을 축하합니다

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

이 학습 계획의 일부

Learn about John Kiriakou

더 알아보기