What is Evidence-Informed Learning Design about?

This book teaches L&D professionals how to create training programs using scientifically validated methods, combining Mirjam Neelen's 15+ years at organizations like Novartis and Google with learning science research. It debunks myths like the 70/20/10 model while providing frameworks for designing practice-heavy, measurable learning experiences that drive real workplace performance improvements.

Who should read Evidence-Informed Learning Design?

Corporate trainers, instructional designers, and HR leaders seeking research-based methods to improve workplace training ROI. It’s particularly valuable for L&D teams in regulated industries like pharmaceuticals or tech needing compliant, scalable skill development solutions. The book assumes basic instructional design knowledge but explains complex concepts clearly.

Is Evidence-Informed Learning Design worth reading in 2025?

Yes, its focus on timeless learning principles and adaptive frameworks makes it particularly relevant for 2025’s challenges of AI integration and rapid reskilling needs. The evidence-based approach helps organizations cut through trend-driven solutions to build future-proof training programs, with updated examples reflecting modern digital workplace realities.

What are the key concepts in Evidence-Informed Learning Design?

- **Practice Engineering**: 40% of learning time should involve deliberate practice - **Myth Busting**: Disproves common L&D assumptions like self-directed learning effectiveness - **Research Synthesis**: Teaches how to evaluate and apply learning science studies - **Data-Driven Design**: Metrics framework for tracking skill transfer to workplaces

How does Neelen’s approach differ from traditional L&D methods?

Neelen rejects intuition-based design in favor of cognitive load-optimized learning sequences. Unlike traditional models focused on content delivery, her method prioritizes spaced practice intervals and performance support tools. The book shows how to replace popular but unsupported concepts like learning styles with evidence-based alternatives.

What famous quotes come from Evidence-Informed Learning Design?

- *“Designing without evidence is like building skyscrapers without engineering principles”* - *“Practice isn’t part of learning – practice is learning”* - *“Our obsession with novelty makes us forget 80 years of proven science”*

How does the book address modern skills development challenges?

Chapter 9 specifically tackles rapid reskilling needs through modular, just-in-time learning architectures. Neelen provides a 5-step framework for identifying critical skills gaps and designing targeted micro-practice environments. Includes case studies from pharmaceutical sales training and tech onboarding programs.

How does this compare to other L&D books like *Make It Stick*?

While both emphasize evidence-based practice, Neelen’s work focuses specifically on corporate application rather than academic settings. It offers more implementation tools like ROI calculators and stakeholder alignment templates compared to theoretical works. The book uniquely addresses hybrid learning ecosystems and digital adoption challenges.

근거 중심 교육 설계

성과 향상을 위한 교육 설계

미리암 닐렌 & 폴 A. 커슈너

4.17(54 Reviews)

근거 중심 교육 설계 개요

"근거 기반 학습 설계(Evidence-Informed Learning Design)"는 유행을 거부하고 과학적 엄격함을 채택함으로써 교육에 혁신을 일으키고 있습니다. 리처드 클라크(Richard Clark)와 도널드 테일러(Donald Taylor)가 지지하는 이 방식은 L&D 업계의 각성제와도 같습니다. 이 방식이 미슐랭 3스타 레스토랑에 비유된다는 사실을 알고 계셨나요? 오직 최고의 재료만이 탁월한 경험을 만들어내는 곳 말입니다.

전달 방식을 선택하세요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

근거 중심 교육 설계의 같은 아이디어를 담았습니다. 나에게 맞는 목소리, 깊이, 속도를 고르고 언제든 바꿔 보세요.

1장

The Bridge to Better Learning: When Science Meets Practice

In 1831, soldiers of the 60th Rifle Corps marched across one of Europe's first suspension bridges near Manchester. Their synchronized steps created a resonant frequency that matched the bridge's natural vibration, causing it to collapse and injuring twenty men. The British Army responded by investigating the incident and issuing a standing order for soldiers to "break step" when crossing bridges-a practical application of evidence that saved lives. This incident serves as a perfect metaphor for the learning profession today, where practitioners often ignore scientific evidence in favor of intuition, fads, and personal beliefs. "Evidence-Informed Learning Design" by Mirjam Neelen and Paul Kirschner has become a cornerstone text for learning professionals seeking to build their practice on solid foundations rather than shifting sands. Since its publication, it has influenced countless training programs and sparked important conversations about how we design learning experiences in workplaces worldwide.

2장

Building on Scientific Foundations: The Learning Sciences

The learning sciences form the backbone of evidence-informed learning design-an interdisciplinary field focused on advancing scientific understanding of learning while improving instructional methodologies. After 50 years of research, learning scientists have reached consensus on several key principles: learning should focus on deeper conceptual understanding rather than just facts, exemplified by teaching problem-solving strategies instead of mere formulas; quality instruction must be balanced with active learner participation through methods like guided discovery and collaborative projects; effective learning environments have identifiable features including clear goals, appropriate challenge levels, and meaningful feedback loops; learning builds on prior knowledge by connecting new information to existing mental models; reflection enhances learning through deliberate practice and self-assessment; and transfer of learning to new situations matters more than mere comprehension, demonstrated when learners can apply concepts across different contexts. These principles draw from multiple influential theories including behaviorism (learning as observable performance changes through stimulus-response associations, like programmed instruction and reinforcement schedules), cognitive science (examining mental processes like perception, memory and reasoning, including cognitive load theory and information processing models), and constructivism (individuals imposing meaning on the world based on previous experiences, as seen in inquiry-based learning and social learning theory). Newer influences include neuroscience, revealing how brain plasticity affects learning, and artificial intelligence, which offers insights into pattern recognition and adaptive learning, though their practical applications for learning design remain limited due to the complexity of translating laboratory findings to real-world settings. Despite this rich scientific foundation, many learning professionals make decisions based on intuition or trends rather than evidence. This creates what the authors call the "Photoshop explanation" phenomenon-a situation where self-proclaimed experts ("quacksperts") spread unverified information, making it difficult to distinguish fact from fiction. Common examples include learning styles theory, right/left brain learning, and brain training games, which persist despite lack of scientific support. In this environment, opinions often trump empirical evidence, resulting in ineffective methods being embraced while proven approaches like spaced practice and retrieval practice are ignored. The solution? Learning professionals must adopt Daniel Willingham's four-step framework for evaluating claims: 1) Strip it and flip it (examine language for vagueness or manipulation, particularly watching for buzzwords and oversimplified promises); 2) Trace it (investigate evidence sources, looking for peer-reviewed research and replication studies); 3) Analyze it (apply critical thinking to evaluate claims, considering alternative explanations and potential biases); and 4) Decide whether to implement the approach based on contextual factors and available resources. By following respected researchers who do quality research-to-practice work, such as those published in peer-reviewed journals and established educational research institutions, learning professionals can build their practice on solid evidence rather than shifting trends. This approach ensures that learning design decisions are grounded in scientific principles rather than popular but unproven methodologies.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

근거 중심 교육 설계의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

3장

Designing Learning Experiences: Beyond Content Delivery

What exactly are "learning experiences" and how do we design them effectively? The term "learning experience design" acknowledges that while we can't design learning itself-which happens in an individual's brain-we can design experiences that facilitate effective, efficient, and enjoyable learning. This approach embraces learning's contextual nature, occurring across various settings from classrooms to workplaces, online platforms, and informal learning environments. Unfortunately, many workplace learning solutions suffer from atomistic design, which creates three key problems: artificially dividing knowledge from skills acquisition, fragmenting complex goals into isolated parts with separate learning activities for each objective, and failing to support learning transfer to real-world contexts. For example, a sales training program might separately teach product knowledge, communication skills, and negotiation techniques without integrating these elements into realistic scenarios that reflect actual sales situations. Designing holistic learning experiences requires starting with a strong foundation: identifying actual performance problems through observation rather than assumptions; determining if learning can truly address the issue; clarifying measurable success criteria; and understanding learners' needs. This involves conducting thorough needs assessments, shadowing top performers, and gathering data about common challenges and mistakes. All steps should focus on authentic learning tasks that mirror real-life situations across five dimensions: the task itself, physical context, social context, assessment results, and performance criteria. For instance, medical training might incorporate simulated emergency scenarios in mock hospital rooms with team dynamics and time pressures that match actual workplace conditions. The authors introduce the concept of "three-star learning experiences" that embody two "holy trinities": 1) effective, efficient, and enjoyable learning, and 2) techniques, tools, and ingredients to achieve learning. Effective learning means learners acquire what they need in the allotted time, demonstrating measurable improvement in performance. Efficient learning requires less time or mental effort while maintaining quality, often achieved through careful sequencing and scaffolding of learning activities. Enjoyable doesn't mean "fun" but rather creating experiences where learners feel accomplishment and increased self-efficacy, such as through progressive challenges that build confidence. These three elements must be balanced-improving one should never harm the others. For example, making learning more "enjoyable" by adding game elements shouldn't reduce effectiveness by distracting from core learning objectives. Similarly, efforts to increase efficiency shouldn't compromise the depth of learning or learner engagement. Success requires careful consideration of cognitive load, motivation theory, and performance support tools that can enhance learning without creating unnecessary complexity. The design process should incorporate regular feedback loops and iterative improvements based on learner performance and responses. This might include pilot testing, gathering user feedback, measuring learning outcomes, and adjusting design elements accordingly. Effective learning experiences also consider the broader organizational context, ensuring alignment with business goals and integration with existing systems and processes.

4장

Eyes Wide Open: Confronting Professional Blind Spots

Despite significant advances in learning sciences over the past decades, many practitioners continue to operate without incorporating crucial research findings into their design decisions. The learning profession often operates with "eyes closed" by systematically ignoring or dismissing evidence that contradicts established practices or deeply held beliefs. This troubling pattern reveals an immature profession struggling to build a solid scientific foundation, where practitioners frequently lack awareness of learning sciences or actively resist applying evidence-based approaches in workplace contexts. Several interconnected factors contribute to this professional blindness: learning professionals come from diverse educational and career backgrounds with varying levels of scientific literacy; many practitioners struggle to critically evaluate and interpret research data; and some incorrectly assume that research conducted on students in educational settings cannot be meaningfully applied to adult workers in corporate environments. The challenge is compounded when stakeholders view learning professionals merely as service providers rather than strategic partners and subject matter experts, often forcing practitioners to implement stakeholders' intuition-based approaches instead of evidence-backed solutions. To overcome these challenges, learning professionals must develop robust skills for evaluating research trustworthiness and validity. This includes carefully examining research methodology and design (with randomized controlled trials representing the highest standard of evidence), sample size and scale (larger participant numbers typically produce more reliable and generalizable results), participant dropout rates and their potential impact on findings, data quality measures (including both reliability and validity metrics), and any potential conflicts of interest that might influence the results. Gorard's "sieve" framework provides a systematic approach through six essential categories: design, scale, dropout, outcomes, fidelity, and validity. This framework helps practitioners rate a study's trustworthiness on a scale from 0 to 4 stars, offering a practical tool for evidence evaluation. Learning professionals should exercise particular caution when encountering commercially driven research, especially when companies investigate their own products or services without proper scientific controls or peer review. Critical analysis should focus on several key aspects: identifying who conducted and funded the research, examining the robustness of the study design and methodology, tracking primary source references rather than relying on secondary citations, and carefully scrutinizing how outcomes were measured and reported. By developing these analytical skills, practitioners can better distinguish between legitimate scientific evidence and marketing materials disguised as research. The path forward requires learning professionals to embrace their role as evidence-based practitioners while actively working to expand their scientific literacy. This includes staying current with peer-reviewed research, participating in professional development focused on research methodology, and building networks with academic researchers in the learning sciences. Only by keeping our eyes wide open and maintaining high standards for evidence can the profession mature and deliver consistently effective learning solutions.

근거 중심 교육 설계에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

5장

Facing Fallacies and Myths: Zombie Ideas That Won't Die

Learning myths persist like zombies that refuse to die, causing significant damage to the field. These myths waste money, resources, time, and effort while distracting professionals from evidence-based approaches. Four main reasons make these myths indestructible: 1) The complexity of scientific evidence makes it hard for practitioners to grasp; 2) Myths strengthen our sense of belonging to groups and provide cultural guidance; 3) The overwhelming availability of information means much unreliable content spreads rapidly; 4) The "Photoshop effect" where, since anything can be manipulated, no experts can be trusted. Several persistent myths deserve debunking: Myth 1: Neuroquatsch (Neuro-nonsense) Brain science has spawned stubborn neuromyths in workplace learning. The most persistent myth is that anything with "neuro" or "brain" in its name is automatically beneficial. While neuroscience can inform learning theory, it faces several problems when applied directly to learning: the "goals problem" (neuroscience can't inform learning design decisions), the "vertical problem" (studying isolated cognitive functions is too simplistic for learning), and the "horizontal problem" (difficulty marrying neuroscientific and learning theories). Despite neuroscientific evidence disproving learning styles, workplace professionals continue pigeonholing people into categories. Cognitive differences between people exist on continuums rather than in distinct categories; self-report measures used to determine learning styles are unreliable; and with at least 71 different learning style models, there are over 2 trillion possible combinations, making practical application impossible. Myth 2: What learners say they prefer is good for them The belief that learners' expressed preferences should guide instructional design is misguided. While learners can provide valuable feedback on certain aspects (like application relevance), their suggestions about how they learn best often don't align with evidence-based approaches. Research typically shows that effective instructional methods benefit all learners regardless of their preferences. Richard Clark found that learner preferences were typically uncorrelated or negatively correlated to learning outcomes-learners often don't benefit from their preferred approaches. Myth 3: Google can replace human knowledge Many believe we no longer need to learn facts since Google provides instant access to information. This overlooks a crucial point: we need knowledge to interpret the information Google provides. Knowledge differs from data and information-data are raw numbers, information is processed data, and knowledge is how we interpret these in our heads. While Google can enhance our memory by helping us find information we partially recall or look up procedures for routine tasks, it becomes nearly useless for complex, non-recurrent skills and ill-structured problems. Myth 4: 21st-century skills are more important than domain-specific knowledge Despite widespread popularity, "21st-century skills" lack clear definition. They're broadly described as transferable competencies like problem-solving, decision-making, communication and collaboration that supposedly transcend specific domains. However, our cognitive architecture relies on long-term memory (LTM), which distinguishes humans from other species by its virtually limitless capacity. What we think of and even how we think is overwhelmingly determined by our knowledge held in LTM. If problem-solving were truly a generic skill, people with no domain knowledge should theoretically outperform those with domain expertise when applying "strategic" problem-solving skills. Research comparing experts and novices contradicts this. Experts possess schemas for encoding multiple elements as single units, acquire skills without needing to recall rules, have automated many complex processes, and use strong domain-specific approaches. The relationship between knowledge and "21st-century skills" is actually the inverse of what's commonly claimed-domain-specific knowledge in our long-term memory actually supports and enables all so-called 21st-century skills.

6장

Finding Focus: Evidence-Based Tools and Techniques

After debunking myths, the authors turn to evidence-based approaches for designing effective learning experiences. They present several key tools and techniques: Complex Skills Design Complex skills require an integrated approach rather than teaching fragmented pieces. The first critical step is designing learning tasks based on the hierarchy of constituent skills, using real-life tasks organized from simple (yet authentic) to complex categories. Each task class should provide appropriate guidance that fades as learners progress, with two main categories of support: supportive information (helping with non-recurrent aspects through conceptual models) and procedural information (enabling recurrent aspects through just-in-time displays and feedback). Effective Tools Common computer programs serve as both productivity tools and "mindtools" that enhance thinking. Spreadsheets help develop critical thinking about variables and relationships. Search engines build complex information problem-solving skills. Word processors improve writing skills through features like Outline view. Research consistently shows handwritten notes produce better learning outcomes than digital note-taking. When writing by hand, we process information more deeply because we must paraphrase, analyze and synthesize content due to writing's slower pace. While multimedia can be effective for learning, it's merely a vehicle-the instructional methodology remains the critical factor. Common assumptions about multimedia learning (that it automatically leads to more learning, is more motivating, or adapts to learning styles) lack convincing evidence. Direct Instruction Despite misconceptions that direct instruction is boring or outdated, it's one of the most effective techniques for teaching novice learners. Direct instruction consists of six steps: reviewing previous material, stating objectives, presenting new material, guiding practice with feedback, assigning independent practice with feedback, and periodic review. Research consistently shows positive effects on learning outcomes across hundreds of studies spanning 50 years. Feedback Feedback is perhaps the most powerful technique for supporting learning, with John Hattie finding an effect size of 0.79 (twice the average of other educational interventions). Effective feedback aims to reduce the gap between current understanding and desired goals through three key focuses: feed up (Where am I going?), feed back (How am I doing?), and feed forward (Where to next?). Three key types of feedback serve different purposes: corrective feedback (single-loop) simply indicates right/wrong answers; directive feedback (double-loop) shows better ways to complete tasks; and epistemic feedback (triple-loop) prompts learners to think about why and how to improve through guiding questions. The effectiveness of feedback depends on clear learning objectives, making feedback a habit that learners actively use, proper timing, and consideration of the learner's skill level and prior knowledge.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

근거 중심 교육 설계의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

7장

Evidence-Based Learning Ingredients

The authors introduce five fundamental "ingredients" that form the foundation of effective learning design: 1. Worked Examples Worked examples demonstrate both the product (beginning state, goal state and solution) and process (problem-solving steps with rationale) of solving problems. They're particularly effective for novices who haven't yet developed problem-solving schemas because they reduce extraneous cognitive load, allowing learners to use their limited cognitive resources more effectively for schema construction and automation. 2. Spaced Learning Spaced learning involves tackling learning in multiple short sessions rather than cramming the same material into one long session. This approach strengthens memory traces through repeated retrieval from long-term memory. Each review session not only returns retention to 100% but also makes the forgetting curve progressively less steep. Learning across different settings enhances retention because learners must mentally reinstate prior learning contexts differently each time, strengthening memory through context updating and integration. 3. Retrieval Practice Retrieval practice involves actively remembering previously learned information. Unlike passive rereading, retrieval practice forces learners to pull information from long-term memory, significantly improving both storage strength and retrieval strength. Meta-analysis found retrieval practice outperforms all other learning strategies, including rereading (the most common approach) and restudying, with a high effect size of 0.61. 4. Interleaving Interleaving involves varying the types of exercises and alternating between related topics when practicing. Unlike blocked practice where learners complete similar problems in sequence, interleaving mixes up problem types so learners must identify which strategy to apply. This approach costs nothing extra but yields significant benefits: learners must decide which approach to use, recognize distinguishing elements between problems, make fewer errors long-term, and achieve better transfer of knowledge to novel situations. 5. Double-Barrelled Learning Double-barrelled learning leverages our dual cognitive processing systems to enhance learning through appropriate combinations of words and images. Based on Paivio's dual coding theory, this approach recognizes that humans process verbal and visual information through separate yet connected cognitive subsystems. When properly combined, words and images create stronger memory traces because images get coded twice (visually and verbally), while utilizing both visual and verbal working memory capacity.

8장

The Learner in the Driver's Seat

The final section shifts focus to empowering learners to take control of their own development. Workers face multiple forms of professional obsolescence in today's rapidly changing organizations. Continuous learning through self-directed and self-regulated approaches is especially crucial in knowledge-intensive workplaces where formal learning experiences aren't always effective for solving complex, novel problems. Self-Directed Learning (SDL) and Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) SDL and SRL are often used interchangeably but have fundamental differences. SDL functions at the macro-level (overall learning process/trajectory), while SRL operates at the micro-level (specific task-focused learning). Both are higher-order metacognitive skills that must be trained within particular domains to transfer effectively. Our faulty mental models about learning create significant barriers to effective SDL/SRL. We often misjudge the quality of our learning outcomes, incorrectly believe errors should be avoided during learning, and tend to overvalue innate differences like talent or intelligence while undervaluing practice and effort. Learning professionals can help learners overcome these faulty mental models both explicitly (teaching "tips and tricks" about learning, explaining domain knowledge's role in SDL/SRL) and implicitly (enabling learners to compare self-assessments with external evaluations). They can provide guidance materials like structured conversation frameworks and reflection prompts to help learners establish goals, monitor progress, and evaluate their learning approaches. Personal Learning Networks (PLNs) A personal learning network is a trusted network of connections that supports continuous professional learning. Effective PLN engagement involves four key behaviors: consuming (discovering information), creating (authoring resources), connecting (with people and information sources), and contributing (sharing knowledge back to the network). When building a PLN, seek people who offer different perspectives, share values you appreciate, demonstrate passion and expertise in relevant areas, inspire you, can be trusted, provide fresh thinking, and offer reality checks on your ideas. Organizations must move beyond supporting individual learning to become true "learning organizations" that constantly learn collectively and transform themselves to better use knowledge. They can foster this symbiosis by developing shared vision, encouraging continuous learning, promoting teamwork, providing necessary freedom and trust, and creating technology-enabled environments.

근거 중심 교육 설계에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

9장

Building Bridges That Won't Collapse

The authors use the dramatic collapse of the Broughton suspension bridge in 1831 as a powerful metaphor for the current state of learning design. Just as the bridge failed because its engineers didn't understand the principles of mechanical resonance, many learning initiatives fail because practitioners ignore established scientific evidence in favor of popular but unproven methods. This historical example serves as a stark reminder that good intentions without solid scientific backing can lead to spectacular failures. Learning professionals must break free from three common pitfalls: relying on personal beliefs rather than evidence, disregarding research that contradicts their preferred approaches, and chasing every new trend that promises revolutionary results. These behaviors mirror the pre-scientific era of engineering, when bridge builders relied more on tradition and intuition than mathematical principles and physical laws. The concept of "idle innovation" is introduced as a crucial counterbalance to the industry's constant push for novelty. This approach advocates for thoughtful pauses in the pursuit of new methods, allowing time to critically evaluate what truly works. Just as modern bridge engineers carefully study structural principles before innovation, learning designers should thoroughly understand cognitive science and learning research before implementing new approaches. The authors emphasize a whole-task design approach, which considers all elements of the learning experience in context, similar to how engineers must consider all forces acting on a bridge. This includes understanding cognitive load, information processing, motivation, and transfer of learning. Successful learning experiences, like successful bridges, must balance multiple factors and constraints. By learning from past failures in both education and engineering, practitioners can build more resilient learning solutions. The authors point to specific examples where evidence-based practices have produced superior results: spaced practice over massed practice, retrieval practice over passive review, and worked examples for novice learners. These proven techniques, like the principles of modern bridge engineering, have emerged from rigorous testing and systematic observation rather than intuition or popular opinion. The ultimate goal is to create learning experiences that are not only effective and efficient but also enjoyable and sustainable - structures that, like well-designed bridges, can reliably serve their purpose for years to come. This requires a commitment to evidence-based practice, continuous evaluation of outcomes, and the courage to abandon popular but ineffective methods in favor of scientifically-supported approaches.

★★★★★

근거 중심 교육 설계 완독을 축하합니다

100만 명 이상의 학습자가 사랑합니다

“23일째 매일 사용하고 있어요. 이제 제 일상의 한 부분이 되었습니다.”

jayallen

근거 중심 교육 설계의 핵심 주제

instructional design research
cognitive load theory
learning science application
evidence-based training
educational myth debunking

근거 중심 교육 설계의 명언

Opinions often trump empirical evidence.
Learning builds on prior knowledge.
Reflection enhances learning.
Transfer of learning to new situations matters more than mere comprehension.
Effective learning means learners acquire what they need in the allotted time.

근거 중심 교육 설계의 등장인물

Mirjam NeelenCo-author and learning design professional
Paul A. KirschnerCo-author and researcher in learning sciences
Daniel WillinghamResearcher who created a claim evaluation framework

저자 소개

*증거 기반 학습 설계: 성과 향상을 위한 교육 개발(Evidence-Informed Learning Design: Creating Training to Improve Performance)*의 저자인 미리암 닐렌(Mirjam Neelen)과 폴 A. 커슈너(Paul A. Kirschner)는 기업 학습 및 교육 심리학 분야에서 세계적으로 인정받는 전문가입니다. 닐렌은 액센추어(Accenture), 구글(Google), 노바티스(Novartis) 등에서 리더십 역할을 수행하며 15년 이상의 기업 현장 경험을 쌓았으며, 전 세계 인력을 위한 학습 아키텍처를 설계하고 있습니다.

네덜란드 오픈 유니버시티(Open University of the Netherlands)의 명예 교수인 커슈너는 교수 설계 연구 분야의 독보적인 인물로, 학습은 어떻게 일어나는가(How Learning Happens) 및 *학습과 교육에 관한 도시 전설(Urban Myths about Learning and Education)*과 같은 기초 문헌의 공동 저자이기도 합니다. 이들의 협업은 영향력 있는 블로그인 '3-Star Learning Experiences'로 이어졌으며, 이곳에서 그들은 이 책의 핵심 원칙인 효과적이고(effective), 효율적이며(efficient), 즐거운(enjoyable) 교육을 옹호합니다.

이 책은 수십 년간의 동료 검토(peer-reviewed) 연구를 기업 트레이너와 교수 설계자를 위한 실행 가능한 전략으로 통합하며, 신경과학적 미신(neuromyths)을 타파하는 동시에 AI 강화 학습과 같은 현대적 과제를 다룹니다. 12개 언어로 번역된 이 책은 대학의 L&D 프로그램과 다국적 기업 교육 부서의 표준 교재가 되었습니다. 커슈너의 이전 저작들은 교사 교육에 널리 채택되었으며, 닐렌의 산업 모델은 포춘 500대 기업 전반에 걸쳐 구현되고 있습니다.

근거 중심 교육 설계 요약 다운로드

근거 중심 교육 설계 요약을 무료 PDF 또는 EPUB으로 받으세요. 인쇄하거나 오프라인에서 언제든 읽을 수 있습니다.

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

Design for how people learn

Julie Dirksen

E-learning by design

William Horton

Evidence-Based Strategies for Teaching Excellence 책 표지

Effective Evidence-Based Teaching Techniques Explained

6 sources

Evidence-Based Strategies for Teaching Excellence

The Learning and Development Handbook

Michelle Parry-Slater

Play to Learn

Sharon Boller and Karl M. Kapp

Instructional Design: Beyond the Production Trap 책 표지

AI in Instructional Design: What’s Changed and What Matters Next

Generative AI for Instructional Design: Changes, Chances, Challenges - AACE

8 sources

Instructional Design: Beyond the Production Trap

The Art and Science of Training

Elaine Biech

Learning That Sticks

Bryan Goodwin & Tonia Gibson & Kristin Rouleau

이 책에 대한 FAQ

더 알아보기

학습 계획

Learn Market and UX Research

This learning plan bridges the gap between raw data and human behavior, providing a comprehensive toolkit for evidence-based decision making. It is ideal for aspiring researchers, product managers, and designers who want to create products that resonate deeply with users and drive business success.

4 h 46 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The science of teaching

This learning plan bridges the gap between cognitive science and classroom practice, providing educators with a rigorous foundation in how the human brain learns. It is ideal for teachers, instructional designers, and educational leaders looking to replace intuition with evidence-based strategies that guarantee student success.

3 h 44 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

learning & Development

This plan is essential for professionals looking to move beyond simple training and into strategic talent development. It is ideal for HR leaders and instructional designers who want to bridge the gap between learning theory and measurable organizational results.

4 h 56 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

design！

This comprehensive design learning path is essential for anyone looking to build or elevate their design career in today's innovation-driven landscape. It's ideal for aspiring designers seeking structured skill development, product managers wanting to think more like designers, entrepreneurs needing to create user-centered solutions, and experienced designers aiming to reach strategic leadership levels. The curriculum bridges foundational knowledge with cutting-edge practice, ensuring you're prepared for both current design challenges and future AI-integrated workflows.

4 h 29 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Education

This learning plan bridges the gap between theoretical psychology and modern classroom innovation. It is essential for aspiring educators, school leaders, and instructional designers looking to master both traditional pedagogy and the future of AI-driven learning.

5 h 58 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

design leader mindset

Design leaders today must navigate beyond craft excellence to drive strategic business impact and cultural transformation. This learning plan is essential for experienced designers moving into leadership roles, current design managers seeking to elevate their strategic influence, and organizational leaders who want to build design-led cultures that foster innovation and deliver exceptional user experiences.

3 h 57 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Master design thinking for systemic change

In a world of increasing complexity, traditional problem-solving approaches often fall short. This learning plan equips professionals, change-makers, and leaders with integrated design and systems thinking capabilities to address complex challenges and create sustainable, transformative solutions.

4 h 59 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Read the Room and Spot the Lie

This plan is essential for professionals who need to navigate high-stakes negotiations or lead complex teams. It benefits recruiters, managers, and investigators by merging neuroscience with practical behavioral analysis to ensure authentic communication.

1 h 45 m•3 섹션

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

지금 바로 학습 여정을 시작하세요

5장

근거 중심 교육 설계

개요근거 중심 교육 설계 개요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

The Bridge to Better Learning: When Science Meets Practice

Building on Scientific Foundations: The Learning Sciences

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Designing Learning Experiences: Beyond Content Delivery

Eyes Wide Open: Confronting Professional Blind Spots

근거 중심 교육 설계에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Facing Fallacies and Myths: Zombie Ideas That Won't Die

Finding Focus: Evidence-Based Tools and Techniques

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Evidence-Based Learning Ingredients

The Learner in the Driver's Seat

근거 중심 교육 설계에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Building Bridges That Won't Collapse

근거 중심 교육 설계 완독을 축하합니다

근거 중심 교육 설계의 핵심 주제

근거 중심 교육 설계의 명언

근거 중심 교육 설계의 등장인물

저자 소개

근거 중심 교육 설계 요약 다운로드

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

이 책에 대한 FAQ

What is Evidence-Informed Learning Design about?

Who should read Evidence-Informed Learning Design?

Is Evidence-Informed Learning Design worth reading in 2025?

What are the key concepts in Evidence-Informed Learning Design?

더 알아보기

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

The Bridge to Better Learning: When Science Meets Practice

Building on Scientific Foundations: The Learning Sciences

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Designing Learning Experiences: Beyond Content Delivery

Eyes Wide Open: Confronting Professional Blind Spots

근거 중심 교육 설계에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Facing Fallacies and Myths: Zombie Ideas That Won't Die

Finding Focus: Evidence-Based Tools and Techniques

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Evidence-Based Learning Ingredients

The Learner in the Driver's Seat

근거 중심 교육 설계에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Building Bridges That Won't Collapse

근거 중심 교육 설계 완독을 축하합니다

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

더 알아보기

근거 중심 교육 설계 개요