What is *Criminal (In)Justice* by Rafael A. Mangual about?

*Criminal (In)Justice* critiques modern criminal justice reforms like decarceration and depolicing, arguing they disproportionately harm vulnerable communities. Mangual uses data to challenge narratives linking crime to poverty or COVID-19, disputes claims that incarceration destabilizes families, and emphasizes the risks of lenient pretrial and post-conviction policies. The book advocates balancing reform with evidence-based crime control measures.

Who should read *Criminal (In)Justice*?

This book is essential for policymakers, legal professionals, and advocates engaged in criminal justice debates. It also appeals to readers seeking data-driven counterarguments to progressive reform claims, particularly those interested in urban safety, policing efficacy, and the societal costs of depolicing.

Is *Criminal (In)Justice* worth reading?

Yes, for its rigorous analysis of policing and incarceration statistics often overlooked in reform discourse. Mangual’s synthesis of academic research, policy journalism, and real-world examples provides a compelling critique of radical decarceration efforts, making it a vital resource for understanding the trade-offs of criminal justice policy.

How does *Criminal (In)Justice* critique decarceration?

Mangual argues decarceration ignores the antisocial tendencies of repeat offenders and risks increasing violence in high-crime areas. He highlights cases where lenient policies allowed dangerous individuals to reoffend, asserting that incarceration remains a critical tool for protecting at-risk communities.

What data does *Criminal (In)Justice* use to challenge reform narratives?

The book cites studies showing crime rates correlate more closely with offender behavior than systemic inequities. It disputes the “mass incarceration” narrative by contextualizing prison populations and challenges claims of widespread police brutality using force incident statistics.

What is the “false-positive problem” discussed in *Criminal (In)Justice*?

This concept refers to the societal cost of under-policing: failing to intervene in potential criminal scenarios to avoid penalizing innocents. Mangual argues that overcautious policing strategies disproportionately harm communities plagued by violence by enabling unchecked criminal activity.

How does *Criminal (In)Justice* address police use of force?

Mangual contends that police violence is rare relative to interactions and often justified. He critiques reforms like defunding, arguing they undermine proactive policing strategies that reduce crime, particularly in neighborhoods demanding stronger law enforcement.

What are the main criticisms of *Criminal (In)Justice*?

Critics may argue the book underestimates systemic racism in policing and overstates the risks of reform. Mangual acknowledges the system’s imperfections but insists radical changes risk sacrificing public safety for ideological goals.

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의

살아남기 그리고 감옥 가지 않기 : 미국 내 제1의 형사 사법 도서

라파엘 A. 맨구얼

4.16(212 Reviews)

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의 개요

"Criminal (In)Justice"에서 라파엘 망구알(Rafael Mangual)은 구체적인 데이터를 통해 대중적인 개혁 담론에 도전하며, 치안 활동의 축소가 어떻게 취약 계층 공동체에 가장 큰 피해를 주는지 밝혀냅니다. 전 NYPD 국장 빌 브래튼(Bill Bratton)이 "필독서"라고 칭한 이 책은, 우리가 범죄 통제 시스템을 해체할 때 진정으로 대가를 치르는 이가 누구인지 묻는 도발적인 탐구서입니다.

전달 방식을 선택하세요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의의 같은 아이디어를 담았습니다. 나에게 맞는 목소리, 깊이, 속도를 고르고 언제든 바꿔 보세요.

1장

The Price of Criminal Justice Reform: A Critical Analysis

When 24-year-old Brittany Hill was gunned down while shielding her one-year-old daughter in Chicago, the tragedy wasn't just a random act of violence. The shooters were Michael Washington, a man with nine felony convictions including murder who was out on parole, and Eric Adams, who was on probation for a weapons charge. This horrific incident exemplifies what Rafael Mangual calls "criminal (in)justice" - preventable tragedies occurring because our system fails to incapacitate repeat offenders who clearly refuse to live within the law. In today's cultural climate, criticizing the criminal justice system's inequities is socially expected. The dominant narrative portrays America as an oppressive carceral state driven by overpolicing, coercive prosecution, and systemic racism. Yet this perspective, according to Mangual, fundamentally misapprehends reality. The book "Criminal (In)Justice" has become a lightning rod in policy circles, with conservative commentators praising its data-driven approach while progressive critics argue it overlooks structural factors. Since its 2022 publication, the book has influenced policy debates in multiple states considering criminal justice reforms.

2장

The Geographic Reality of Crime in America

Crime in America isn't evenly distributed - it's hyper-concentrated both geographically and demographically. This concentration means that seemingly minor geographic shifts can dramatically alter one's risk of victimization. In New York City, for example, the Upper East Side precinct saw just one shooting and one homicide in 2020, while just two miles north at 125th Street, another precinct recorded 20 shootings and 10 homicides. Most Americans live in areas with virtually no murders. County-level analysis shows just 2 percent of US counties (containing 28 percent of the population) account for about 50 percent of all murders, while 54 percent of counties see no murders at all in a given year. Chicago exemplifies this stark concentration. In 2019, the city's overall murder rate was 18.2 per 100,000, but its ten most violent community areas (home to just 15.6 percent of the population) experienced 53 percent of all killings, with murder rates ranging from 40.8 to a staggering 131.9 per 100,000. Meanwhile, 28 other community areas (25.4 percent of the population) recorded one or fewer homicides each, yielding a collective murder rate of just 1.6 per 100,000. These disparities reveal that when we speak of a city's crime problem, we're often really talking about intense violence concentrated in specific neighborhoods, primarily affecting Black and Latino communities. This concentration isn't just academic - it shapes daily life for millions of Americans. Growing up in 1990s Brooklyn, Mangual lived with constant anxiety about being mugged or beaten. When his parents moved the family to suburban Long Island, that fear vanished. Years later, he made the same decision for his son, moving from East Harlem to safer Forest Hills. What about those who can't make such moves? This question drives much of Mangual's analysis. The most important disparity we need to address, he argues, isn't racial representation in prisons but rather the vast gulf between America's most dangerous and safest neighborhoods.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

3장

The Myth of Poverty as Crime's Root Cause

The common belief that crime stems primarily from poverty and inequality doesn't hold up against the data. Take Thaddeus "T.J." Jimenez, who after winning a $25 million wrongful conviction settlement in 2012, returned to his Chicago neighborhood to rebuild his gang. Despite his newfound wealth, he was arrested for shooting an unarmed man while livestreaming the crime. For decades, we've been told that improving socioeconomic indicators would reduce urban crime. Yet New York City's remarkable crime decline from 1990-2018 (when homicides fell from 2,262 to 295) occurred while poverty rates actually increased slightly from 18.8% to 19.5%. During the Great Recession, when Black male unemployment nearly doubled in NYC, homicides continued to fall. Nationally, violent crime dropped 15% between 2007-2010 despite unemployment doubling, and America's violent crime rate declined by over 30% between 1981-2016 despite income inequality growing by 20%. This disconnect between crime and socioeconomic factors has been documented by criminologists like Barry Latzer, who notes that Black Americans experienced significant economic improvements in the mid-20th century (including poverty rates for Black male household heads dropping from 70.8% to 21.5% between 1949-1969), yet homicide victimization rates increased substantially during this period. What distinguishes offenders isn't merely poverty-millions in similar economic circumstances never commit violent crimes-but rather attributes like entitlement, antisocial personality disorders (present in 40-70% of male prisoners versus 2-4% of the general male population), and substance abuse disorders (affecting around 60% of inmates). These factors appear more predictive of criminal behavior than poverty alone. Have you ever wondered why some people raised in poverty become productive citizens while others turn to crime? The answer lies less in economic circumstances and more in personality traits and cultural influences. This insight challenges prevailing wisdom but helps explain why economic improvements don't consistently reduce crime rates.

4장

The Critical Role of Incarceration in Public Safety

Despite growing popularity of anti-incarceration sentiment, reducing prison populations risks releasing serious offenders who will continue to victimize vulnerable communities. Reformers frequently cite America's high incarceration rate compared to other nations as evidence of overincarceration, but this comparison masks critical differences in crime rates and resources. Countries like the UK impose mandatory minimum sentences for illegal firearm possession (5 years) that far exceed typical US sentences for similar offenses (15 months median). Another key difference is America's wealth and capacity to spend on law enforcement compared to countries like Brazil, which has higher violent crime but lower imprisonment rates due to resource constraints rather than less punitive approaches. Incarceration serves two crucial functions: incapacitation and deterrence. Nearly 40% of violent felons commit their crimes while on probation, parole, or pretrial release, as evidenced by studies in Baltimore and Chicago where the average shooter or killer had nearly 12 prior arrests. While incarceration clearly reduces crime through incapacitation (even critics acknowledge it contributed to the 1990s crime decline), the evidence on whether prison itself causes more crime post-release is far more ambiguous than reform advocates suggest. Most studies find imprisonment has little impact on recidivism probability, with criminogenic effects primarily appearing in settings without rehabilitative programming. This suggests prison reform rather than decarceration is the logical solution. The push for mass decarceration ignores that American imprisonment is primarily reserved for serious offenders with extensive criminal histories who pose genuine public safety risks. Imagine living in a neighborhood where the same violent offenders cycle in and out of the justice system, repeatedly victimizing the community. This reality confronts millions of Americans in high-crime areas. The debate around post-conviction incarceration involves complex trade-offs between justice concerns and public safety, but the data clearly shows imprisonment is reserved for serious offenders with lengthy criminal histories who are highly likely to reoffend.

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

5장

Rethinking Pretrial Detention and Bail Reform

The debate around pretrial detention centers on approximately 631,000 jail inmates in the US, nearly three-quarters of whom are awaiting case disposition. This represents a significant portion of America's incarcerated population and raises fundamental questions about the balance between individual liberty and public safety. While acknowledging that cash bail systems can place undue burdens on individual liberty, particularly for low-income defendants, Mangual argues that reforms must carefully consider the public safety benefits of pretrial detention, especially for high-risk offenders with histories of violence or flight risk. There are legitimate concerns about people being detained for months without conviction, often losing jobs, housing, and family connections in the process. However, these individual hardships must be weighed against broader public safety interests. Recent data from multiple jurisdictions shows that defendants released pretrial have significant rates of re-arrest - in some cities, up to 20% are arrested for new offenses while awaiting trial. A better approach would reorient pretrial release around objective risk assessment rather than financial ability, incorporating factors like criminal history, community ties, and the nature of current charges. Unfortunately, many jurisdictions have implemented sweeping reforms aimed at reducing jail populations without proper consideration of safety impacts. Cities like New York, Chicago, and Philadelphia have eliminated cash bail for many offenses, leading to concerning patterns of repeat offending by released defendants. These reforms, while well-intentioned, often fail to distinguish between low-risk defendants who deserve release and high-risk individuals who pose genuine threats to public safety. Evidence suggests these efforts have harmed public safety, with multiple studies showing increases in both violent and property crime following bail reform implementation. Meanwhile, reform advocates have overstated the collateral consequences of incarceration, including impacts on children of incarcerated individuals. While family separation is undoubtedly traumatic, this leads to a crucial question: are children always better off with their parents present, regardless of those parents' behavior? Research indicates that in cases involving violent offenders or those with substance abuse issues, temporary separation through incarceration may actually create safer environments for children. The path forward requires more nuanced approaches that maintain pretrial detention as a tool for public safety while implementing reforms to prevent unnecessary detention of low-risk defendants. This could include expanded use of supervised release programs, electronic monitoring for medium-risk defendants, and expedited case processing to reduce lengthy pretrial stays.

6장

The Complex Impact of Parental Incarceration on Children

The common reform narrative suggests imprisonment universally harms children by "tearing families apart." However, research reveals a more nuanced reality, particularly when examining the prevalence of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) among incarcerated parents. Studies consistently show that 40-70% of prisoners exhibit ASPD symptoms, compared to just 1-3% in the general population. This disorder, characterized by persistent patterns of manipulative and aggressive behavior, frequently appears alongside substance use disorders, creating particularly dangerous home environments. Research indicates that children living with parents suffering from both ASPD and substance abuse face significantly higher risks of physical abuse, emotional trauma, and developmental challenges. Contrary to conventional wisdom, parental incarceration can sometimes benefit children, especially those living in volatile situations. A groundbreaking 2021 American Economic Review study found that parental incarceration reduced children's likelihood of future incarceration by 4.9 percentage points and improved their socioeconomic outcomes, including higher high school graduation rates and increased college attendance. Similar positive effects emerged in studies from North Carolina, Norway, and Colombia, where parental incarceration correlated with increased educational attainment and reduced juvenile delinquency rates. These findings suggest that removing highly antisocial parents from households can create more stable environments for child development. The potential dangers of keeping children with unfit parents are illustrated through numerous tragic cases. In one particularly disturbing instance, a mother with multiple domestic violence arrests nearly killed her six-year-old son during a drug-induced episode. Despite her extensive history of violence and substance abuse, she had retained custody due to policies prioritizing family preservation. Similar cases across the country demonstrate how rigid adherence to family reunification can sometimes place children in harm's way. When the Ohio study showing potential benefits was published in 2021, it faced significant backlash from academics who seemed to prioritize ideological commitments to decarceration over empirical evidence. Critics attempted to discredit the methodology despite its robust design and peer review process. This resistance highlights a broader problem in criminal justice reform: the tendency to dismiss evidence that challenges prevailing narratives about incarceration's effects. This mindset-privileging ethical considerations over evidence that challenges decarceration-underlies many criminal justice failures in recent years. Cases of repeat offenders causing harm to innocent victims have increased in jurisdictions with aggressive decarceration policies. Without confronting this ideological resistance and acknowledging the complex realities of parental incarceration, implementing moderate, evidence-based approaches will remain difficult. This may ultimately cause more children to suffer than necessary, as policies continue to prioritize keeping families together regardless of the circumstances or potential risks to child welfare.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

7장

The Reality of Police Use of Force

Following George Floyd's murder, police reform became a central focus in criminal justice debates, with over 30 states passing more than 140 new police oversight laws by April 2021. Cities also enacted significant changes, from Minneapolis voting to dismantle its police department to New York increasing officer liability and civilian oversight. This reform push continued despite 2020 seeing the largest single-year homicide spike in national history. While nearly 1,000 annual police killings sounds jarring, proper context undermines claims of a systemic police violence problem. Analyzing 2018 data, Mangual notes 93% of the 990 fatal police shootings involved armed suspects. Using Vice News data, he estimates police discharged firearms approximately 3,037 times that year. When contextualized against 686,665 full-time officers making over 10 million arrests and 61.5 million public contacts, these numbers reveal that only 0.44% of officers discharged firearms and only 0.03% of arrests resulted in shootings. Similarly, Bureau of Justice Statistics data shows just 2.8% of police-initiated contacts involved force or threats of force, with only 0.3% involving firearms. A trauma medicine study analyzing over 1 million police calls found force used in just 1 of 128 arrests, with 98% of those incidents resulting in no or mild injuries. While defunding police could reduce use-of-force incidents, criminological literature overwhelmingly shows this would increase crime and cost more lives. Research shows each additional officer prevents approximately 0.1 homicides, with effects twice as large for Black victims. Contrary to militarization concerns, police shootings have actually declined dramatically since the 1970s. NYPD officers shot and injured 221 people in 1971 versus just 13 in 2019. Chicago police wounded about 100 civilians annually between 1974-1978, compared to just 34 firearm discharges in 2019.

8장

The False Narrative of Qualified Immunity

Mangual systematically dismantles the popular belief that qualified immunity serves as an impenetrable shield protecting police officers from accountability for misconduct. Through comprehensive analysis of litigation data, he demonstrates that victims of police misconduct regularly receive substantial compensation through civil settlements. A detailed examination of NYPD lawsuits from 2015-2018 reveals telling statistics: only 3% of cases were resolved in favor of police defendants, while 35% resulted in settlements. The top 10 settlements during this period exceeded $41.7 million, with individual cases often reaching seven-figure amounts. These numbers directly contradict the narrative that qualified immunity prevents victims from obtaining justice. Further supporting this argument, a landmark 2017 Yale Law Journal study conducted an extensive analysis of qualified immunity cases, finding that the doctrine successfully protected officers in merely 3.9% of applicable cases. A 2020 follow-up study provided additional insight, revealing that civil rights attorneys don't systematically decline cases that might be vulnerable to qualified immunity dismissal. This suggests that qualified immunity doesn't create the chilling effect on civil rights litigation that its critics often claim. The real financial protection for officers, Mangual argues, comes from indemnification policies rather than qualified immunity. Statistical evidence shows that 99.98% of damages in police misconduct cases are paid by government entities rather than individual officers. This arrangement ensures victims receive compensation while protecting officers from personal financial ruin, achieving a balance between accountability and practical law enforcement operations. Regarding mental health crisis response, Mangual provides a nuanced analysis of alternative intervention programs. While acknowledging some success stories like Oregon's CAHOOTS (Crisis Assistance Helping Out On The Streets), he identifies significant practical limitations to scaling such programs. In Eugene, Oregon, CAHOOTS handled 17% of 911 calls in 2019, primarily focusing on non-violent situations like welfare checks and transportation assistance. However, even this widely-praised program required police backup in approximately 1.5% of cases (1 in 67 calls), highlighting the continuing need for law enforcement involvement. The challenge of completely separating mental health response from policing becomes clear when examining the numbers: New York City alone faces nearly 180,000 mental health-related calls annually. This volume, combined with the projected national shortage of mental health professionals (estimated to reach 250,000 by 2025), makes complete diversion from police response logistically impossible. Moreover, data shows that roughly 20% of calls initially classified as public health-related ultimately require police intervention due to safety concerns or criminal activity, demonstrating the complex interplay between mental health and public safety responses.

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

9장

The Cultural Dynamics Behind Police Interactions

Mangual shares compelling personal anecdotes from his youth as a Latino teenager who deliberately cultivated a tough image through specific choices in clothing, attitude, and demeanor. He recalls wearing oversized clothing, adopting an aggressive walking style, and maintaining what he calls a "don't mess with me" facial expression. He and his friends would frequent upscale malls, taking satisfaction in watching "rich kids" cross to the other side when they approached. This behavioral choice came into sharp focus one day when an older white woman clutched her purse fearfully upon seeing him, a moment that forced him to confront the broader implications of his cultivated image. Drawing extensively on sociologist Elijah Anderson's groundbreaking work, particularly "Code of the Street," he explains how many young men in urban areas deliberately project tough personas as a survival mechanism. Anderson's research meticulously documents how youth "profile" or "represent" themselves through carefully constructed appearances suggesting gang or drug involvement. This includes specific fashion choices like designer clothing, particular brands associated with street culture, distinctive walking styles, and practiced facial expressions. These behaviors serve as essential protection in neighborhoods governed by what Anderson terms the "code of the street," where respect and the credible threat of vengeance are paramount for personal safety. This deliberate projection of street identity, Mangual argues, significantly contributes to police misidentification and false positives in ways that many critics of law enforcement overlook. He provides examples of how young men might wear gang colors without gang affiliation, adopt threatening postures as preventive measures, or display expensive items to project status - all behaviors that can trigger police attention. While acknowledging that police bias exists and requires addressing, Mangual suggests the false-positive problem is more complex than simple racial prejudice, rooted in cultural behaviors specifically designed to communicate toughness and command respect. Geographic crime concentration plays a crucial role in shaping where police operate and consequently where false positives occur. Mangual presents data showing that in many cities, 50% or more of violent crime occurs in just 5% of street segments. He challenges the prevalent view that racial disparities in police encounters stem primarily from bias, noting that departments deploy officers based on sophisticated crime mapping and empirical trends. This concentration of policing in high-crime areas means that mistakes and misidentifications will disproportionately happen in these heavily policed neighborhoods, creating a complex feedback loop between community behavior, police presence, and instances of misidentification.

10장

Race and Criminal Justice: A Nuanced Perspective

Mangual acknowledges undeniable racial disparities in criminal justice statistics but challenges the conclusion that these disparities constitute evidence of systemic racism. He argues that critics play an unfair game with language, as their definition of "systemic racism" refers to racially disparate outcomes regardless of intentions, rather than actual racial animus. This framing allows critics to level charges they can't support-that America's criminal justice system is characterized by widespread racial animus. Mangual emphasizes that contextualizing racial disparities often reveals they shrink significantly once relevant, race-neutral factors are controlled for. He cites research showing that concentrated enforcement in high-crime areas can lead to racial disparities in police interactions, but regression analyses accounting for local crime rates frequently reduce or eliminate evidence of racial bias. Drug enforcement often serves as a pretextual attack on violent crime, not merely targeting drug use. He presents data showing significant overlap between drug and violent offenders, including that 70% of Baltimore murder suspects had prior drug arrests. He notes that Black communities themselves supported punitive drug laws, with the Congressional Black Caucus co-sponsoring the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, because drug-related violence disproportionately ravaged Black neighborhoods. Black and Latino communities have disproportionately benefited from the dramatic decline in violent crime since the 1990s. Using New York City data, he shows the gun homicide rate for Black New Yorkers fell from nearly 40 per 100,000 in 1993 to about 10 per 100,000 by 1999, while the white rate fell from about 3 to 1 per 100,000. The crime decline's impact on Black men's life expectancy is "roughly equivalent to the impact of eliminating obesity altogether."

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

11장

Finding Balance in Criminal Justice Reform

Mangual concludes by summarizing his key arguments against decarceration, noting that reducing America's incarceration rate by 70% to match other developed nations would require releasing violent offenders. He counters the conventional wisdom that American prisons are filled with nonviolent offenders, asserting incarceration is largely reserved for serious, violent criminals. He challenges the idea that children benefit when their parents avoid prison, citing evidence that many prisoners' antisocial behavior means children may be better off without them around. Addressing the depolicing movement that gained momentum after George Floyd's murder, he argues that new restrictions on police are unlikely to significantly reduce force incidents because such incidents are already rare. The author moves beyond statistics to emphasize the human cost of violent crime, sharing a personal story of finding crime scene photos in his detective father's briefcase as a child. He contrasts his own trauma from merely seeing photos with the devastating experience of a six-year-old girl who witnessed her father's murder on a New York street. While data is important in policy debates, we must remember the horrific realities of violence and what's at stake for vulnerable communities if decarceration and depolicing increase crime. Critics focusing exclusively on racial disparities in enforcement outcomes miss the most important output of America's criminal justice system: massive crime declines that disproportionately benefited minority communities. This complicates claims of systemic racism, as it's difficult to explain why a system allegedly rigged against Black and brown Americans would benefit them almost exclusively when achieving its stated goals. While acknowledging individual injustices occur, any meaningful discussion must weigh the disproportionate benefits of crime reduction against the disproportionate costs of enforcement.

★★★★★

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의 완독을 축하합니다

100만 명 이상의 학습자가 사랑합니다

“23일째 매일 사용하고 있어요. 이제 제 일상의 한 부분이 되었습니다.”

jayallen

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의의 핵심 주제

repeat offender incapacitation
crime geographic concentration
public safety disparities
incarceration policy analysis
urban violence data

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의의 명언

Crime in America isn't evenly distributed - it's hyper-concentrated.
The most important disparity isn't racial representation in prisons.
What distinguishes offenders isn't merely poverty.
Prison reform rather than decarceration is the logical solution.
Nearly 40% of violent felons commit their crimes while on probation.

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의의 등장인물

Rafael A. MangualAuthor and legal policy expert
Brittany HillVictim of a fatal shooting in Chicago
Thaddeus "T.J." JimenezGang leader who returned to crime after a payout
Barry LatzerCriminologist who studied crime and economics
Michael WashingtonRepeat offender involved in a fatal shooting

저자 소개

Criminal (In)Justice: What the Push for Decarceration and Depolicing Gets Wrong and Who It Hurts Most의 저자인 라파엘 A. 망구알(Rafael A. Mangual)은 형사 사법 정책 전문가이자 맨해튼 연구소(Manhattan Institute)의 닉 오넬(Nick Ohnell) 펠로우입니다.

그의 저서는 현대의 개혁 운동을 비판하며, 경찰력 감축과 탈투옥 정책이 소외된 지역 사회에 불균형적인 피해를 준다고 주장합니다. 이러한 관점은 그의 법률적 훈련, 경찰 활동 및 공공 안전 이니셔티브(Policing and Public Safety Initiative)의 연구 책임자 역할, 그리고 미국 시민권 위원회(U.S. Commission on Civil Rights) 산하 뉴욕주 자문 위원회에서의 활동을 바탕으로 형성되었습니다.

폭스 뉴스(Fox News)의 빈번한 논평가이자 월스트리트 저널(The Wall Street Journal) 및 *시티 저널(City Journal)*의 기고가인 망구알은 NYPD 형사의 아들로서 겪은 배경을 바탕으로, 통계적 엄밀함과 도시 범죄 역학에 대한 직접적인 통찰력을 결합합니다.

그의 연구는 윌리엄 바(William Barr) 전 법무장관과 빌 브래튼(Bill Bratton) 전 NYPD 국장과 같은 인물들로부터 찬사를 받았으며, 법 집행 및 공공 안전에 관한 국가적 논쟁에서 그의 영향력을 공고히 하고 있습니다.

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의 요약 다운로드

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의 요약을 무료 PDF 또는 EPUB으로 받으세요. 인쇄하거나 오프라인에서 언제든 읽을 수 있습니다.

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

The New Jim Crow

Michelle Alexander

Locking up Our Own

James Forman Jr.

Justice at Work

Marc Doussard

Podem abolir les presons?

Angela Y. Davis

Unfair

Adam Benforado

Crime & punishment

Russell Marks

Culture, Crime, and the Crisis of Accountability 책 표지

21 sources

Culture, Crime, and the Crisis of Accountability

Black Agenda

Anna Gifty Opoku-Agyeman

이 책에 대한 FAQ

더 알아보기

학습 계획

Batman's Legal and Domestic Downfall

This plan is essential for those analyzing the intersection of extralegal justice and modern governance. It serves legal scholars, tech innovators, and public policy experts looking to replace volatile human vigilantism with stable, automated systems.

1 h 15 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

The Citizen's Guide to Strategic Liberation

This guide is essential for activists and civic leaders seeking to understand the structural mechanics of political change. It provides a rigorous framework for those looking to transition from reactive protest to strategic, nonviolent liberation efforts.

1 h 12 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Inside the Criminal Mind

This plan offers a deep dive into forensic psychology and behavioral analysis for those fascinated by criminology. It is essential for aspiring investigators, legal professionals, or true crime enthusiasts seeking to understand the 'why' behind the world's most complex crimes.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

The Gotham Courtroom Chaos Chronicles

This course is essential for legal professionals and urban planners interested in the intersection of vigilante justice and administrative law. It provides a unique analytical framework for anyone looking to understand the liability risks of high-stakes heroics and staff management.

1 h 45 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Psychologie noir

This learning plan provides critical insights into the darker aspects of human behavior and the mechanics of manipulation. It is essential for professionals in law enforcement, psychology, or anyone seeking to protect themselves from predatory personalities.

5 h 40 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Architecture of American Racism

This learning plan provides a comprehensive structural analysis of how systemic inequality was intentionally built into American institutions. It is essential for educators, policymakers, and advocates seeking to understand the historical roots of modern social and economic disparities.

3 h•6 섹션

학습 계획

The Anatomy of a Murderous Idea

This plan is essential for students of literature and philosophy seeking to understand the psychological depths of Crime and Punishment. It is ideal for anyone interested in the intersection of morality, criminal psychology, and the arduous path toward spiritual atonement.

1 h•3 섹션

학습 계획

Johan Liebert

This plan provides a deep dive into criminal psychology and the mechanics of manipulation. It is ideal for students of psychology, true crime enthusiasts, or anyone seeking to understand the darkest aspects of human behavior.

5 h 34 m•4 섹션

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

지금 바로 학습 여정을 시작하세요

6장

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의

개요흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의 개요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

The Price of Criminal Justice Reform: A Critical Analysis

The Geographic Reality of Crime in America

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Myth of Poverty as Crime's Root Cause

The Critical Role of Incarceration in Public Safety

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Rethinking Pretrial Detention and Bail Reform

The Complex Impact of Parental Incarceration on Children

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Reality of Police Use of Force

The False Narrative of Qualified Immunity

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Cultural Dynamics Behind Police Interactions

Race and Criminal Justice: A Nuanced Perspective

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Finding Balance in Criminal Justice Reform

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의 완독을 축하합니다

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의의 핵심 주제

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의의 명언

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의의 등장인물

저자 소개

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의 요약 다운로드

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

이 책에 대한 FAQ

What is Criminal (In)Justice by Rafael A. Mangual about?

Who should read Criminal (In)Justice?

Is Criminal (In)Justice worth reading?

How does Criminal (In)Justice critique decarceration?

더 알아보기

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

The Price of Criminal Justice Reform: A Critical Analysis

The Geographic Reality of Crime in America

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Myth of Poverty as Crime's Root Cause

The Critical Role of Incarceration in Public Safety

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Rethinking Pretrial Detention and Bail Reform

The Complex Impact of Parental Incarceration on Children

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Reality of Police Use of Force

The False Narrative of Qualified Immunity

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Cultural Dynamics Behind Police Interactions

Race and Criminal Justice: A Nuanced Perspective

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Finding Balance in Criminal Justice Reform

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의 완독을 축하합니다

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

더 알아보기

흑인 범죄와 미국의 정의 개요