Kapitel 1
The Innovation Paradox: Why We're Tired of the Next Big Thing
In a world obsessed with innovation, something strange has happened. The very concept meant to energize and inspire has begun to exhaust us. Alf Rehn's "Innovation for the Fatigued" arrives at a critical moment when "innovation fatigue" has become epidemic in organizations worldwide. Despite being named one of Europe's top management thinkers by Thinkers50, Rehn doesn't offer another set of innovation platitudes. Instead, he delivers a refreshing critique that has earned praise from innovation experts like Antonio Nieto-Rodriguez, who calls it "an absolute must-read" for embracing innovation 4.0. The book has become required reading in corporate innovation programs at companies like Microsoft and IBM, who recognize that their previous approaches have led to diminishing returns. As we face unprecedented global challenges requiring genuine creativity, Rehn's perspective couldn't be more timely: we don't need more innovation talk-we need deeper innovation thinking.
Kapitel 2
The Crisis at the Heart of Innovation
Innovation has undergone a troubling transformation. What once energized organizations now often exhausts them. In 2006, when Rehn introduced innovation initiatives to corporate audiences, he was met with universal enthusiasm and genuine excitement about possibilities. By 2018, similar presentations received notably mixed reactions-many showing clear signs of what he terms "innovation fatigue," with executives visibly wincing at the mere mention of innovation workshops or brainstorming sessions.
We now live in what Rehn calls "the golden age of innovation chatter." Over 100 books on innovation are published monthly, alongside countless articles, podcasts, TED talks, and social media content. Yet this torrent of information has become repetitive and boring, recycling the same advice: look outside your industry, listen to diverse groups, experiment with customers, embrace failure. The literature endlessly references the same companies (Apple, Airbnb, Amazon, Google, Facebook, Netflix, Tesla), creating a shallow, homogeneous discourse that fails to acknowledge the complexity of true innovation. These case studies, while impressive, have become corporate folklore rather than practical guides.
The term "innovation" has lost meaning through overuse, now applied indiscriminately to everything from minor product tweaks to revolutionary developments. A company changing its logo calls it innovation; a restaurant adding a new menu item calls it innovation; a software update becomes "groundbreaking innovation." This dilution has created an environment where innovation fatigue is normal and expected. People still want to innovate but are served recycled cliches rather than meaningful problem-solving discussions. Rehn calls this "shallow innovation"-a style-over-substance approach dominating both literature and corporate practice, where the appearance of innovation matters more than actual progress.
This emptying of meaning has created both opportunities and dangers. Companies can freely market themselves as innovative without accountability, using innovation-washing similar to greenwashing. But internally, the concept no longer energizes teams-it fatigues them. Despite abundant resources, innovation labs, and dedicated innovation departments, organizations fail to nurture genuine innovation, getting distracted by innovation industry trends rather than developing ideas from within. Many companies invest millions in innovation theaters-fancy spaces with colorful Post-its and whiteboards-while failing to address fundamental organizational barriers to creative thinking.
In contrast, "deep innovation" focuses on creating meaningful change rather than following trends. While shallow innovation creates beach-finding apps and food delivery services, deep innovation tackles climate change and develops renewable energy solutions. While shallow innovation launches another makeup brand or social media platform, deep innovation builds sustainable sewage systems for megacities and develops breakthrough medical treatments. Deep innovation isn't about following trends but solving wicked problems-complex challenges with no easy solutions. This makes it difficult for corporations to embrace despite its greater importance, as it requires longer time horizons, higher risk tolerance, and comfort with uncertainty. Organizations must choose between the easy path of shallow innovation and the challenging but meaningful pursuit of deep innovation.
Kapitel 3
How Ideas Die in Organizations
Most ideas don't die from active opposition but from neglect. Rather than being overtly killed by "Those Who Don't Get It," ideas typically perish through passive indifference-the stifled yawn, the lack of engagement, the promise to "think about it later" that never materializes.
Consider this scenario: an enthusiastic employee presents an idea and is met with lukewarm responses that appear superficially supportive but actually signal disinterest. "That's interesting," a manager says with a blank expression. "We should definitely look into that... when we have time." This quiet death through neglect is far more common than direct criticism, leaving potentially valuable ideas "unloved, uncared for, utterly alone and ignored."
Even our micro-behaviors-subtle cues like unresponsiveness, unsmiling exteriors, or occasional yawns-can effectively communicate disinterest and disapproval without words. Most people don't recognize how powerfully these signals affect others, creating environments deeply inhospitable to creativity even when they have no conscious intention of suppressing ideas.
The broken windows theory demonstrates how small signs of disorder can trigger cascading negative behaviors. In Philip Zimbardo's famous experiment, an abandoned car in the Bronx was quickly vandalized while an identical car in Palo Alto remained untouched until Zimbardo himself damaged it-after which passersby joined in destroying it. The key insight isn't about neighborhood quality but about signals: the Bronx car appeared uncared for (missing license plates), while the Palo Alto car seemed maintained until someone "broke the window," signaling it was fair game.
For companies, this reveals how small signs of neglect can have outsized effects on innovation culture. Though organizations claim to value creativity, the many "broken windows" in their processes often go unnoticed, gradually undermining their innovation potential.
Rehn illustrates this with a chemical company's failed idea competition. Despite generating over 700 submissions, the initiative damaged the innovation culture when participants received impersonal rejection emails. One senior engineer who had enthusiastically submitted five carefully developed ideas, working evenings and weekends, received five identical messages stating only: "Thank you for taking part in the idea competition. We got many excellent submissions, could only shortlist a few, and unfortunately your idea was not among them." His disillusionment revealed how innovation cultures die not through dramatic failures but through small, thoughtless acts of disrespect.
Kapitel 4
Building Cultures of Deep Creativity
Creating a culture of innovation requires nurturing a supportive environment where ideas can flourish. The very word "culture" derives from Latin "cultus" meaning "care" or "cultivation"-agricultural terms suggesting attentive nurturing. Yet discussions of innovation culture often fixate on risk-taking and experimentation rather than care, focusing on mavericks and successful projects instead of the underlying environment.
After more than a decade researching innovation cultures, Rehn has identified four critical elements that distinguish truly deep innovation cultures from shallow ones: respect, reciprocity, responsibility, and reflection. While organizations don't need equal strength in all four areas, the absence of any one signals trouble.
Respect forms the foundation of healthy innovation cultures, though it may seem too "soft" for innovation discussions. In over 80% of companies with innovation culture problems, people reported feeling their ideas weren't respected, directly causing innovation fatigue. Christine Porath's global survey of 20,000 people found respect was the most desired leadership behavior, yet increasingly rare.
Creating a culture of respect requires patience and vigilance. Leaders must model key behaviors: taking ideas seriously, allowing civil dissent, rewarding kindness, and paying attention to micro-behaviors like body language and word choice that can either nurture or destroy psychological safety.
Importantly, respect doesn't mean avoiding criticism. The most innovative organizations excel at productive criticism. From Steve Jobs and Jeff Bezos to Pixar's endless questioning and top ad agencies' critical atmospheres, creative powerhouses thrive on rigorous critique. Productive criticism shows respect by demonstrating you've listened to and engaged with someone's idea. Being yawned at often hurts more than tough questions.
Reciprocity means understanding that demanding innovation without providing support is futile. Truly innovative companies like 3M (with its famous 15% rule) and Google (with its 20% time) reciprocate their innovation demands with concrete support. Innovation can't thrive when it's just another demand piled onto existing responsibilities.
Leaders can build reciprocity by ensuring every idea receives feedback, promoting "givers" who support others' ideas, pairing innovation expectations with allocated resources, and actively discouraging the practice of ignoring others' ideas.
Responsibility involves making innovation everyone's concern rather than allowing non-engagement to become acceptable. In shallow cultures, people may be polite when ideas are presented but feel no obligation to participate in developing them. Deep innovation cultures encourage people to "call nonsense on nonsense," respect uncertainty and doubt, balance perspectives, and show vulnerability about not understanding new concepts.
Reflection is the fourth and most fickle element. Shallow innovation thinking thrives when unchallenged, which explains why innovation theater persists despite widespread fatigue. True innovation cultures don't just "do innovation"-they continuously question and challenge it, ensuring organizational learning rather than getting trapped in shallow innovation games.
Kapitel 5
The Imagination Premium
For innovation cultures to create value, they need ideas to nurture and develop. While strong innovation cultures naturally capture existing organizational ideas, they must also cultivate curiosity and imagination to generate not just more ideas, but better ones.
The innovation industry craves clear, step-by-step processes that can be packaged into books or consulting models, and business leaders desire surefire innovation methods. However, true innovation stems from elements that can't be flowcharted-there's no checklist for respect, no 2x2 matrix for creativity.
Leaders must accept this fundamental uncertainty and embrace human imagination, despite its reputation as childish or non-serious in business contexts. Imagination-our mind's capacity to think the previously unthinkable-often faces resistance in corporate settings, where managers frequently request "realistic" or "practical" ideas. Yet almost every great innovation began as a tremendous leap of imagination, from flight to smartphones-before realization, innovations are simply figments of imagination.
We're approaching an era where AI, big data, and analytics will be as commonplace as electricity or internet access-no longer competitive advantages but basic requirements. In this coming "Imagination Age" that succeeds the Information Age, as digital tools become ubiquitous and data processing becomes nearly free, imagination becomes the true differentiator.
To understand imagination, we must grasp how layered human thought truly is. Building on Kahneman's Systems 1 and 2, imagination requires digging deeper-from instinctive topsoil to the hard-to-reach sedimentary rock of imagination. Most organizational thinking relies on routines and learned patterns (System 1), which help navigate familiar situations but introduce biases. When facing complexity, we engage System 2's analytical thinking. However, the true challenge comes when organizations face situations not covered by existing knowledge or practices, requiring them to move beyond comfortable thinking patterns into deeper imaginative territory.
Organizations naturally develop comfort zones that limit creative thinking. Conferences exemplify this-removing everyday annoyances while surrounding participants with like-minded individuals, potentially reinforcing consensus rather than challenging thinking. Similarly, organizational structures often cluster similar skillsets together, with engineers eating lunch with engineers and account managers socializing with other account managers.
Play-defined as exploratory activity following only its own internal logic-offers a powerful way to break creativity's dependence on established thinking. Unlike typical corporate experiments constrained by existing mindsets, play represents a deliberate break from the known.
Kapitel 6
Diversity: The Missing Ingredient in Innovation
Innovation thinking suffers from troubling machismo. From Menlo Park to Microsoft, innovation has traditionally been viewed as a man's world, with companies paying lip service to diversity without extending it to innovation work. Emily Chang's "Brotopia" reveals persistent gender bias in how we conceptualize innovation, with society more likely to reference Steve Jobs than Hedy Lamarr-despite her pioneering work on technologies that made Bluetooth and WiFi possible.
We celebrate Edison and Bell but forget Josephine Cochrane's dishwasher invention or Gertrude Belle Elion's groundbreaking medical innovations that cured some cancers and saved countless lives. Had a man accomplished what Elion did, he'd likely be a household name rather than nearly forgotten.
There's an undeniable element of privilege to innovation. Being financially secure creates opportunities to innovate that aren't available to everyone. Even Steve Jobs, often portrayed as rising from humble beginnings, had parents who spent their life savings to move to a better school district and later funded his expensive college education.
The narrow definition of innovation has created a system that primarily funds solutions for problems that young, affluent men face-hence the abundance of food delivery apps, dating apps, gaming technologies, and ways to anonymously pay for entertainment. Meanwhile, innovations addressing challenges faced by poor single women, non-Caucasian consumers, elderly people, or those with disabilities receive far less attention.
Lack of diversity in innovation presents a triple threat to companies: it limits innovation efforts to narrow market segments, reduces the pool of novel ideas, and harms financial performance. McKinsey's research shows gender-diverse companies outperform peers by 21 percent, while ethnically diverse companies outperform by 33 percent.
Monocultures-organizations dominated by a single demographic group-are innovation killers. Research shows that innovative teams need both psychological safety (feeling safe to share ideas) and cognitive diversity (different problem-solving approaches). Psychological safety creates environments where ideas aren't routinely killed, while cognitive diversity ensures ideas develop in optimal ways.
Deep innovation cultures don't require constant harmony-quite the opposite. Research consistently shows that some degree of disharmony, conflict, and constraints makes teams more creative. What's needed is "respectful disharmony"-the ability to communicate about difficult topics and disagreements while maintaining respect and reciprocity.
Organizations often have cognitive surplus trapped in isolated islands that rarely engage in creative cross-pollination. "Cultural brokers"-people with multicultural experience who ease interactions between diverse groups-measurably increase team creativity by merging ideas from different cultures and enhancing idea-sharing. Cultural brokerage extends beyond ethnic diversity to bridging divides between departments, age groups, educational backgrounds, and even personality types.
Kapitel 7
Building Resilient Innovation
Innovation has become increasingly detached from meaning, filled with buzzwords and empty rhetoric. Philosopher Harry Frankfurt's essay "On Bullshit" helps explain much of modern innovation talk. Unlike lies, which have a relationship with truth (even if inverted), bullshit is "unconnected to a concern with the truth"-language used not to communicate but to impress or bamboozle. This phenomenon is particularly evident in corporate innovation theaters, where companies host hackathons and innovation labs that generate excitement but rarely produce lasting change.
When everything can be labeled "innovation," the term loses meaning, becoming an empty status marker rather than a meaningful concept. This leads to absurdities like "smarter socks" with sensors that communicate with your iPhone-over-solving non-problems. Similar examples include blockchain-enabled toasters and AI-powered water bottles that remind you to drink water. Innovation fatigue reflects a broader crisis of meaning in work, with Gallup finding only 15% of employees globally engaged with their jobs. This disengagement costs organizations billions in lost productivity and missed opportunities for genuine innovation.
Purpose drives innovation-studies show over 60% of executives believe it supports innovation capabilities and helps deal with disruption. Companies like Patagonia demonstrate this through their commitment to environmental sustainability, which drives both product innovation and business practices. Yet many companies fail to translate this understanding into meaningful action. Take the CEO who proudly declared his company's purpose was "Excellence!"-a technically valid but meaningless statement that provides no real guidance. Compare this to Bempu, whose bracelet monitors infant body temperature to prevent hypothermia in developing countries. Their purpose-"Simply saving lives"-creates genuine meaning and engagement, leading to focused innovation efforts with measurable impact.
Innovation, like creativity and strategy, requires balanced tension. Too little challenge creates "strategic boredom," while unrealistic expectations lead to "strategic burnout." The sweet spot lies in having just enough stress to feel challenged without becoming overwhelmed. Companies like 3M achieve this balance by allowing employees to spend 15% of their time on side projects while maintaining clear strategic goals and deadlines.
Shallow innovation is safer and easier than deeper innovation. It's more readily recognized as "innovation," more likely to receive positive media coverage, and more easily understood by stakeholders and financial actors. Examples include superficial product updates or digital interfaces that add complexity without solving real problems. Breaking this cycle requires conversations about ambition, daring, and courage that push innovation cultures beyond award-winning novelties toward meaningful impact and change. Organizations like Tesla demonstrate this by pursuing fundamental innovations in electric vehicle technology rather than incremental improvements to existing systems.
Innovation requires courage-not the heroic kind, but the courage to do something different that might not receive immediate approval. For managers building deep innovation cultures, this means creating foundations for others' courage. Three types of courage are essential: the courage to allow employees to act without explicit permission, as demonstrated by Google's original "20% time" policy; the courage to say 'no' to innovation itself when appropriate, exemplified by Apple's selective approach to feature development; and the courage to govern by embedding notions of risk and responsibility in organizational structures, as seen in Amazon's "Day 1" philosophy and its acceptance of calculated failures.
Kapitel 8
Time, Velocity, and Rhythm in Innovation
Innovation doesn't operate on a single timeline but dances to multiple rhythms. While innovation discourse often fetishizes speed ("Move fast and break things!"), real innovation requires understanding various temporal modes. Leaders must recognize that different innovation types demand different timescales-running a project requiring long gestation like an agile sprint will underdeliver, while treating quick experiments as multi-year endeavors creates inertia.
Speed often drives innovation because velocity brings energy-when people feel momentum, they more readily accept novel ideas and experiments. Organizations can become lethargic without a sense of urgency. The "burning platform" metaphor represents an extreme time-shift technique where leaders declare business-as-usual will lead to organizational death. While powerful for creating urgency, this alarm can only be sounded once-like the boy who cried wolf, managers who constantly invoke crisis lose credibility.
Agile development represents a temporal shift in innovation-emphasizing quick bursts of activity with continuous follow-up rather than lengthy structured plans. These compressed timeframes change assumptions about what's possible, making organizations more action-focused while reducing experimentation costs.
Every organizational moment can be "innovation meaningful." Leaders must recognize both how ideas can be killed through momentary micro-aggressions and how purposeful actions in key moments can build stronger innovation cultures. Creating memorable moments-whether highlighting risk-taking or stopping everything to showcase exemplary work-clarifies what innovation means in practice.
Despite our social imagination of innovators as impatient and action-oriented, true innovation leadership requires patience. Many transformative innovations develop over decades-the internet took 40-50 years from early research to widespread adoption. Consider Chester Carlson's xerography invention: patented in 1942, it took 17 years to become "the most successful single product of all time," transforming a small company into a multi-billion dollar giant.
Sometimes the best way to encourage innovation is to temporarily disregard it entirely. Just as Miles Davis understood that not playing a note could be more powerful than playing it, strategic innovation pauses create both calm and tension. Breaks allow people to focus elsewhere without guilt while making the eventual return to innovation more meaningful.
An organization that wants to be innovative needs to design for slack-breaking out of the mindset that slack equals waste. Without space for imaginative thinking, companies waste their cognitive surplus needed to compete. Initiatives like capping overtime, discouraging after-hours emails, encouraging napping, and implementing fewer and shorter meetings have proven to improve efficiency rather than limit it.
Kapitel 9
From Shallow Innovation to Meaningful Change
The innovation industry produces what Rehn provocatively calls "innovation pornography"-glib, spurious presentations of innovation that, like pornography, offer cleaned-up versions of reality. While pornography simplifies and polishes the messy complexities of real human sexuality, innovation literature similarly presents unrealistically perfect narratives about innovation processes.
Innovation stories in magazines like Fast Company or at TED talks follow a predictable formula: genius gets idea, overcomes doubters, finds supporters, and triumphantly succeeds. But real innovation starts with half-baked ideas developed through messy processes. Help sometimes makes things worse; opposition sometimes strengthens ideas. Prototypes often look nothing like original concepts. The process includes crises, arguments, lost faith, and confusion.
The problem arises when managers believe these sanitized innovation stories. The Pygmalion effect (where high expectations improve performance) and its opposite, the Golem effect (where low expectations decrease performance), powerfully shape organizational outcomes. Leaders entranced by shallow innovation books look for specific behaviors, and when they don't see them, treat their organization as deficient. This creates a self-fulfilling prophecy where the organization becomes demoralized and confirms the leader's negative assessment.
We need to return to an approach that emphasizes humility and care rather than impossible expectations. For fatigued organizations, we must find new ways to talk about, criticize, and evaluate innovation. We need to think like farmers rather than robber barons looking for the next raid.
To build resilient innovation cultures that defeat fatigue, remember these principles: First, little things matter-a single yawn can kill an idea, while small acts of respect can engage innovation. Culture is built from millions of subtle interactions, not just fancy mission statements. Second, nurture ideas rather than just generating them-respect, responsibility, reciprocity, and reflection are essential. Third, true imagination beats everything-it's our advantage in an age of AI and data. Fourth, embrace multiple forms of diversity-not just of people but of rhythms, spaces, and perspectives. Finally, purpose and ambition drive deep innovation-we need less but better innovation aimed at meaningful problems.
Innovation is too important to treat with kid gloves or demean with fairy tales. Criticism helps hone innovation and curb its excesses. We live in a world that claims to love innovation yet opts for easy solutions and quick thrills. With wicked problems like fake news, aging societies, inequality, and environmental damage, we need deep innovation more than ever-innovation aimed at impact rather than PR.
