What is
Every Man's Battle by Stephen Arterburn about?
Every Man's Battle is a Christian self-help guide addressing sexual temptation, offering strategies for men to achieve "sexual integrity" through spiritual discipline and behavioral changes. The revised edition incorporates modern challenges like technology and neuroscience insights, framing lust as a battle requiring vigilance and accountability. Critics argue it oversimplifies addiction and normalizes harmful behaviors.
Who should read
Every Man's Battle?
The book targets Christian men struggling with pornography, infidelity, or compulsive sexual behavior. It appeals to those seeking a faith-based approach to purity, though its conservative framing of gender roles and critiques of its therapeutic validity may limit its relevance for broader audiences.
Is
Every Man's Battle worth reading?
While praised for sparking conversations about male sexuality in Christian circles, the book faces criticism for portraying women as "temptation grenades" and men as inherently predatory. Supporters highlight its actionable steps, but critics caution against its lack of psychological depth and potential to shame readers.
What are the main concepts in
Every Man's Battle?
Key ideas include "bouncing the eyes" (avoiding lustful glances), "starving the mind" of sexual stimuli, and pursuing accountability. The authors emphasize behavioral control over addressing emotional roots, advocating strict boundaries with media and relationships. A controversial metaphor describes women as "vessels of sexual fulfillment".
What criticisms exist about
Every Man's Battle?
Critics condemn its normalization of marital coercion, victim-blaming rhetoric, and depictions of women as dangerous objects. Survivors credit the book with exacerbating guilt in unhealthy relationships, citing passages that equate refusing sex with enabling sin. Others critique its failure to address trauma or neurobiological factors in addiction.
How does
Every Man's Battle use biblical examples?
The book reinterprets David and Bathsheba’s story through Uriah’s perspective, portraying Bathsheba as a cherished “ewe lamb” to contrast David’s lust. This framing aims to inspire men to protect their spouses’ purity, though some argue it distorts the narrative’s focus on power abuse.
What practical advice does
Every Man's Battle offer?
Strategies include avoiding R-rated movies, installing internet filters, and confessing temptations to an accountability partner. The authors advocate drastic measures like quitting jobs or moving homes to avoid “stumbling blocks,” prioritizing external behavior over internal healing.
How does the revised edition address modern issues?
The updated version discusses social media, dating apps, and pornography’s neurochemical effects, urging readers to “rewire” their brains through abstinence. It retains the original’s controversial metaphors but adds testimonials of men who credit the book with saving their marriages.
What quotes are central to
Every Man's Battle?
Notable lines include:
- “My eyes were ravenous heat seekers locking on any target with sensual heat”.
- “I’d merely exchanged masters” (on swapping porn for marital entitlement).
Critics argue such imagery reinforces objectification rather than redemption.
Are there alternatives to
Every Man's Battle?
Books like The Great Sex Rescue or Worthy of Her Trust offer less shaming, relationship-focused approaches to purity. Secular options like The Porn Trap emphasize cognitive-behavioral strategies over spiritual warfare, addressing root causes like trauma or anxiety.
How does Stephen Arterburn’s background influence the book?
Arterburn, a bestselling author and founder of New Life Ministries, blends evangelical theology with self-help frameworks. His radio show and counseling clinics inform the book’s pastoral tone, though some question his lack of clinical expertise in sexual health.
What impact has
Every Man's Battle had on Christian culture?
The book shaped evangelical discourse on male sexuality, popularizing “purity culture” concepts. However, survivors of abuse cite its teachings as enabling spousal coercion and guilt, with one reviewer noting it “laid the groundwork for our marriage ending”.