Bad Men Do what Good Men Dream by Robert I. Simon Summary

Bad Men Do What Good Men Dream by Robert I. Simon explores the psychological parallels between criminal behavior and the hidden impulses of ordinary individuals. Through case studies of psychopaths, serial killers, and everyday people, Simon argues that everyone harbors dark desires, but self-control and ethics separate "good" from "bad" actions. The book blends forensic psychiatry, moral psychology, and real-world examples to dissect how societal norms shape behavior.

This book is ideal for true crime enthusiasts, psychology students, and mental health professionals seeking insights into criminal psychology. It’s also accessible to general readers interested in understanding the universal struggle between moral choices and repressed urges. Simon’s clinical expertise makes it particularly valuable for forensic practitioners.

Yes, for its thought-provoking analysis of human behavior, though some critics note uneven editing. Readers praise its balance of academic rigor and readability, with gripping case studies that challenge assumptions about morality. However, those seeking a purely clinical textbook may find its anecdotal approach lacking.

Key ideas include:

• The “dark side” of human behavior exists on a continuum, not as a binary of good vs. evil.
• Criminal acts often stem from universal human impulses exacerbated by poor impulse control.
• Self-awareness and societal structures help mitigate harmful actions.

Simon illustrates these through analyses of psychopathy, sexual violence, and everyday moral compromises.

Simon rejects the “monster” myth, arguing criminals share psychological traits with non-criminals but lack restraint. He emphasizes environmental triggers, childhood trauma, and cognitive distortions as catalysts for violence. For example, he compares a rapist’s entitlement to workplace bullying, framing both as power-driven acts.

Some readers question Simon’s theories as overly speculative, citing limited empirical data. Others note repetitive case studies and a tendency to generalize. However, most agree the book succeeds as an introductory text for understanding criminal psychology’s ethical complexities.

Simon juxtaposes extreme cases (e.g., serial killers) with relatable scenarios (e.g., workplace envy) to show how similar impulses manifest differently. A corporate executive’s manipulative tactics, for instance, mirror a con artist’s deceit but stay within legal bounds.

Yes—Simon argues that recognizing universal dark urges is the first step toward self-control. By analyzing how criminals rationalize actions, readers learn to identify and navigate their own ethical gray areas. The book offers no prescriptive solutions but promotes introspection.

Dr. Simon is a renowned forensic psychiatrist, former AAPL president, and author of over 200 publications. His textbook Clinical Psychiatry and the Law was cited in a landmark Supreme Court case. He has decades of experience assessing violent offenders and advising courts.

Unlike dense academic texts, Bad Men Do What Good Men Dream uses narrative-driven analysis to engage lay readers while maintaining clinical rigor. It’s often compared to Jon Ronson’s The Psychopath Test but delves deeper into ethical frameworks.

Its themes of moral ambiguity and impulse control remain critical amid rising discussions about AI ethics, social media behavior, and mental health crises. Simon’s warnings about denying humanity’s dark side resonate in an era of polarized discourse.