An Ordinary Man by Richard Norton Smith Summary

An Ordinary Man explores Gerald R. Ford’s journey from a modest Midwestern upbringing to the U.S. presidency, emphasizing his integrity, crisis management during Watergate, and efforts to restore national trust. The biography reveals Ford’s underrated leadership, pivotal decisions like Nixon’s pardon, and his commitment to bipartisanship.

History enthusiasts, political science students, and readers interested in post-Watergate governance will find value in this deep dive into Ford’s presidency. It’s also ideal for leadership scholars studying humility in crisis management.

Yes—Smith’s meticulous research and engaging narrative offer fresh insights into Ford’s legacy, balancing his achievements (economic stabilization, diplomatic strides) with critiques (e.g., handling of the Warren Commission). The book reshapes perceptions of Ford as a “transitional” leader.

Key themes include integrity over ambition, the restoration of public trust, and principled compromise. Ford’s Midwestern values, congressional pragmatism, and willingness to prioritize country over party recur throughout.

Ford is depicted as a consensus-builder who valued transparency and stability. His hands-on approach to Congress, willingness to work across aisles, and focus on healing post-Watergate divisions define his leadership.

Ford pardoned Nixon to halt national divisiveness and refocus on pressing issues like inflation and foreign policy. Smith argues this controversial decision, though politically costly, exemplified Ford’s belief in “merciful justice”.

The book counters the “accidental president” narrative by highlighting Ford’s strategic foresight, legislative acumen, and resilience during economic crises. It positions him as a proactive stabilizer, not a placeholder.

His Grand Rapids upbringing instilled humility, fiscal conservatism, and a service-oriented mindset. These values shaped his policy priorities (budget discipline, civil rights) and aversion to Washington elitism.

Smith’s focus on Ford’s character over political spectacle sets it apart. Unlike sensationalized accounts, it emphasizes quiet competence—making it a standout in leadership literature.

The book acknowledges criticism of Ford’s handling of the Warren Commission and economic policies but contextualizes these within era-specific challenges. Smith contrasts short-term disapproval with long-term historical reappraisal.

• “Truth is the glue of government.”
• “I want to be remembered as a healer.”

These lines underscore Ford’s belief in transparency and national unity post-Watergate.

In an era of political polarization, Ford’s emphasis on civility, institutional respect, and bipartisan problem-solving offers timely lessons. Smith frames his presidency as a model for bridging divides.