What is *Follow the Science* by Sharyl Attkisson about?

*Follow the Science* exposes systemic corruption in the pharmaceutical industry, documenting how Big Pharma, government agencies, and media outlets collude to prioritize profits over public safety. The book reveals financial ties between vaccine advocates and manufacturers, undisclosed vaccine injuries, and efforts to suppress dissenting voices. Attkisson supports her claims with exclusive evidence, including leaked documents and insider testimonies.

Who should read *Follow the Science*?

This book is essential for readers interested in public health controversies, investigative journalism, or vaccine policy debates. It appeals to healthcare professionals, policymakers, and citizens concerned about corporate influence on medical research. Attkisson’s findings are particularly relevant for those skeptical of mainstream narratives about drug safety.

Is *Follow the Science* worth reading?

Yes—the book combines rigorous investigative reporting with shocking case studies, such as Pfizer’s first documented severe Covid vaccine injury in a child. Attkisson’s Emmy-winning credibility and reliance on primary sources make it a compelling critique of institutional conflicts of interest.

What evidence does Sharyl Attkisson present about pharmaceutical industry corruption?

Attkisson cites financial ties between vaccine promoters and manufacturers, secret government acknowledgments of vaccine-linked autism cases, and collusion between pharmaceutical companies and media outlets to suppress adverse event reports. She also details how medical schools receive industry-funded curricula that downplay risks.

How does *Follow the Science* critique Big Pharma’s influence on medical education?

The book reveals that pharmaceutical companies fund biased training materials for doctors, emphasizing drug benefits while minimizing risks. Attkisson argues this creates systemic bias in healthcare, with practitioners unknowingly disseminating industry-friendly narratives to patients.

Does *Follow the Science* address Covid-19 vaccine controversies?

Yes—it highlights the case of a child who suffered severe neurological damage during Pfizer’s Covid vaccine trial, alleging the incident was initially obscured. Attkisson also examines financial incentives behind rapid vaccine approvals and censorship of safety concerns.

What examples of media collusion with Big Pharma does the book describe?

Attkisson documents undisclosed partnerships between news outlets and pharmaceutical advertisers, including suppressed investigations into vaccine injuries and pre-scripted talking points distributed to journalists. These practices allegedly skewed coverage toward uncritical promotion of industry claims.

How does *Follow the Science* portray the government’s role in pharmaceutical oversight?

The book accuses regulatory agencies of prioritizing corporate interests over public safety, citing leaked conversations where officials privately admitted vaccine risks while publicly denying them. Attkisson argues this revolving-door dynamic enables systemic failures in safety monitoring.

跟着科学走: 意识形态如何损害证据

在科学、政策和公共讨论的交汇点上，一个令人不安的趋势正在显现：**意识形态对证据的腐蚀**。当预设的结论先于实证研究时，真理往往成为第一个牺牲品。

### 腐蚀的过程

意识形态并非总是通过直接的审查来发挥作用；它通常通过更微妙的机制渗透到研究中：

1. **确认偏误**：研究人员倾向于寻找、解释和支持那些能够证实其现有信念的信息。
2. **选择性发表**：与流行叙事相悖的研究结果往往面临更高的出版门槛，或者干脆被束之高阁。
3. **语言的武器化**：中立的术语被带有价值判断的语言所取代，从而在数据呈现之前就预设了结论。

### 为什么这很重要

当证据被意识形态化时，后果是深远的：

* **公众信任的丧失**：当科学被视为党派斗争的工具时，机构的公信力就会崩溃。
* **错误的政策决策**：基于意识形态而非现实的政策注定会失败，往往还会伤害到它们本意要帮助的人。
* **学术自由的萎缩**：由于担心违反非正式的意识形态准则，学者们可能会进行自我审查。

### 寻求客观性

为了对抗这种趋势，我们必须重新致力于：

* **证伪性**：科学的力量不在于证明我们是对的，而在于不断尝试证明我们是错的。
* **透明度**：公开数据、方法和潜在的利益冲突。
* **智识谦逊**：承认我们的理解是有限的，且容易受到偏见的影响。

正如[理查德·费曼](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Feynman)曾经指出的那样：*“首要原则是你不能欺骗自己——而你正是最容易被欺骗的人。”* book cover

《跟着科学走》摘要

意识形态如何损害证据在科学、政策和公共讨论的交汇点上，一个令人不安的趋势正在显现：**意识形态对证据的腐蚀**。当预设的结论先于实证研究时，真理往往成为第一个牺牲品。 ### 腐蚀的过程意识形态并非总是通过直接的审查来发挥作用；它通常通过更微妙的机制渗透到研究中： 1. **确认偏误**：研究人员倾向于寻找、解释和支持那些能够证实其现有信念的信息。 2. **选择性发表**：与流行叙事相悖的研究结果往往面临更高的出版门槛，或者干脆被束之高阁。 3. **语言的武器化**：中立的术语被带有价值判断的语言所取代，从而在数据呈现之前就预设了结论。 ### 为什么这很重要当证据被意识形态化时，后果是深远的： * **公众信任的丧失**：当科学被视为党派斗争的工具时，机构的公信力就会崩溃。 * **错误的政策决策**：基于意识形态而非现实的政策注定会失败，往往还会伤害到它们本意要帮助的人。 * **学术自由的萎缩**：由于担心违反非正式的意识形态准则，学者们可能会进行自我审查。 ### 寻求客观性为了对抗这种趋势，我们必须重新致力于： * **证伪性**：科学的力量不在于证明我们是对的，而在于不断尝试证明我们是错的。 * **透明度**：公开数据、方法和潜在的利益冲突。 * **智识谦逊**：承认我们的理解是有限的，且容易受到偏见的影响。正如[理查德·费曼](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Feynman)曾经指出的那样：*“首要原则是你不能欺骗自己——而你正是最容易被欺骗的人。”*

莎里尔·阿特基松

4.26(480 Reviews)

《跟着科学走》摘要概述

在《追随科学》（*Follow the Science*）一书中，艾美奖得主、记者谢丽尔·阿特基森（Sharyl Attkisson）揭露了大型制药公司如何操纵研究、沉默批评者，并将利润置于人民之上。疫苗推广者与行业内部人士之间那些令人震惊的联系，将如何让你对所听到的关于“追随科学”的一切产生怀疑？

选择讲述方式

用不同学习方式探索《跟着科学走》摘要

来自《跟着科学走》的相同理念。选择适合你的声音、深度和节奏，随时切换。

第 1 章

When Science Becomes a Weapon: Unmasking the Hidden Forces Behind Medical "Truth"

In a world where "follow the science" has become a rallying cry, investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson delivers a bombshell expose that has rocked the medical establishment. Her book has become required reading in medical ethics courses at top universities and sparked heated debates in scientific circles. With over 100,000 copies sold in its first month, this New York Times bestseller has been praised by doctors, researchers, and patients alike for its unflinching examination of how science has been corrupted by profit motives and political agendas. Even celebrities like Joe Rogan and Russell Brand have featured discussions about its revelations, calling it "the most important book about modern healthcare ever written." As Robert F. Kennedy Jr. noted, "This book doesn't just challenge our understanding of medicine-it forces us to question everything we've been told about health by authorities we've trusted our entire lives."

第 2 章

The Manufactured Reality of Modern Medicine

We live in an artificial reality carefully constructed by pharmaceutical companies and their government partners. This manufactured world determines which health issues receive attention and which are ignored, based not on public health needs but on profit potential. The system is so thoroughly corrupted that prescription drugs have become the third leading cause of death in America, according to Danish physician Dr. Peter Gtzsche-yet this epidemic receives virtually no media coverage. The architecture of this deception is breathtaking in its scope. Drug companies fund most scientific research, design medical education programs, and provide the bulk of advertising revenue for media outlets. Meanwhile, our government subsidizes unhealthy food production, allows known toxins in our environment, and incentivizes a medical system that reduces patients to target numbers achievable only through expensive pharmaceuticals. This corruption extends to the very definition of medical terms. When COVID vaccines failed to prevent disease transmission as promised, the CDC quietly changed its definition of "vaccine" in 2021, removing the phrase "protecting the person from that disease" and replacing it with merely "stimulate the body's immune response." This fundamental alteration-moving the goalposts without public discussion-epitomizes how scientific language is manipulated to protect corporate interests rather than public health. The cost of this system is measured not just in dollars but in human suffering. The price of vaccinating children has skyrocketed from $10 in 1975 to thousands today, while chronic disease rates have exploded. Our health agencies prioritize propaganda and silencing critics rather than addressing these emergencies. When faced with evidence of harm from their recommended treatments, they respond not with scientific curiosity but with censorship and character assassination. Yet there may be a silver lining to this broken system-the bad actors finally went too far. With COVID's blatant disinformation campaigns, illogical mandates, and vicious attacks on dissenting scientists, a diverse coalition has formed of liberals, conservatives, and nonpartisans who previously never questioned public health narratives. Parents, doctors, researchers, and officials are now looking beyond COVID, asking what else health authorities have misled us about. This collective awakening may be our path to redemption.

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

轻松跟读，《跟着科学走》摘要中的每个词都会随音频实时高亮。

第 3 章

Down the Rabbit Hole: A Journalist's Awakening

My journey into the dark underbelly of medical science began unexpectedly after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. As a CBS News correspondent, I was reassigned from my regular beat to cover terrorism-related stories, including the planned restart of smallpox vaccination in response to bioterrorism fears. Though I'd had little previous interest in medical reporting, I quickly recognized familiar scandal components: money driving decisions, government-corporate partnerships, and propaganda controlling narratives. The smallpox vaccine carried substantial risks-including potential deaths and contagion-compared to an unquantifiable terrorist threat. When I reported that NBC journalist David Bloom's death at age 39 while embedded with troops in Iraq occurred after receiving both smallpox and anthrax vaccines, most media outlets ignored this bombshell revelation. His death certificate should have been reported for vaccine adverse event tracking but wasn't until my story aired. Similar cases emerged, including Army Reservist Rachel Lacy, whose death certificate explicitly listed "recent smallpox and anthrax vaccination(s)" as contributors to her death after receiving five different shots in one day. The military eventually admitted vaccines "might have led to" her death, but only after significant pressure. These experiences removed blinders I didn't realize I was wearing, revealing scientific scandals all around that few journalists were covering fully. I began to see how the perversion of science had become so commonplace it was costing countless lives, all while being protected by a wall of silence from the very institutions tasked with safeguarding public health.

第 4 章

The Corruption of Medical Research

The scientific research process-supposedly our gold standard for determining medical truth-has been thoroughly compromised by financial interests. In 2006, three young, single Black mothers-Sharrissa Cook, Bernita Lewis, and Survonda Banks-enrolled their extremely premature infants in what they were told was simply a "support group" at University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital. In reality, they had unwittingly placed their fragile babies into the SUPPORT Baby Oxygen study, a government-funded experiment that Dr. Michael Carome of Public Citizen later called "egregious and shocking" in its ethical deficiencies. The study aimed to identify the lowest oxygen level that would prevent eye damage in premature infants while still preventing brain damage and death. Researchers kept babies in either high or low oxygen groups regardless of individual needs, and shockingly altered oxygen monitors to give false readings so staff wouldn't adjust levels. Parents weren't informed about death risks. More high-oxygen babies developed vision disorders while low-oxygen preemies were more likely to die. When ethics watchdogs found consent violations, researchers and officials pushed back fiercely, eventually pressuring the ethics office to back down. By 2024, the FDA had weakened informed consent requirements, allowing researchers to bypass it for studies they deem "minimal risk"-a disturbing regression in research ethics. This pattern of corruption extends to drug approvals. In 2021, the FDA approved Biogen's Alzheimer's drug aducanumab (Aduhelm) despite the company initially halting clinical trials when interim results showed the drug wouldn't work. Nine months later, Biogen inexplicably reversed course, claiming they'd reexamined the data with FDA collaboration and found evidence of effectiveness. In an unprecedented move, the FDA presented a joint briefing with Biogen rather than an independent analysis, with FDA's Dr. Billy Dunn calling a previously "futile" study a "home run." The FDA's own advisory committee harshly criticized this collaboration as biased and inappropriate. With a price tag of $56,000 per patient annually, critics warned the drug could bankrupt Medicare while offering false hope to millions of families. When Dunn later left the FDA amid calls for his resignation, he quickly landed a director position at Prothena, a company developing similar brain drugs-completing the revolving door between regulator and industry.

从《跟着科学走》摘要中收获更多

每日获取新洞见，探索 10 万+ 条课程内容
文字实时高亮，与音频同步
保存你的书库，在所有设备上随时访问

第 5 章

The Pharmaceutical Industry's Control Mechanisms

Twenty-five years ago, pharmaceutical companies and media corporations successfully lobbied to make America one of few countries allowing prescription drug TV advertising. By 2020, pharma accounted for 75% of televised ad spending-$4.58 billion annually. This creates an inevitable conflict where media companies censor information that threatens their pharmaceutical revenue stream. Similarly, politicians influenced by pharma's $497 million in annual lobbying serve industry interests over constituents. Organizations like PhRMA ($27.6 million) and major companies like Pfizer and Merck spend millions each to influence government decisions on Medicare coverage and favorable legislation. This influence extends to controlling scientific data. Companies like Novartis ($51.6 billion revenue) and its spinoff Syngenta ($16 billion) effectively "buy up" academic institutions through research funding, ensuring scientists avoid discovering safety risks in their products. The NIH's $33 billion in annual grants purchases similar control over America's research landscape, favoring studies benefiting pharmaceutical partners while avoiding those that might unearth inconvenient facts. Scientists who "go rogue" face orchestrated campaigns of discreditation. When Berkeley biology professor Tyrone Hayes discovered the herbicide atrazine could feminize male frogs-causing some to develop both testes and ovaries at levels thirty times below EPA drinking water safety limits-Syngenta orchestrated a comprehensive campaign to destroy his credibility. They paid third parties to write critical op-eds, enlisted academics as critics, manipulated internet searches, and funded columnists who attacked Hayes without disclosing their Syngenta connections. Despite overwhelming evidence of environmental harm-the EPA's own assessment concluded atrazine likely affects 54% of all species-the agency reregistered the herbicide in 2020, demonstrating how industry influence can override scientific findings. Hayes noted the broader concern that of 80,000 human-made chemicals, most haven't been studied with atrazine's depth, leaving significant knowledge gaps about their effects on human health.

第 6 章

The Hidden Mechanisms of Scientific Manipulation

After years of investigation, I've identified ten key mechanisms that pharmaceutical companies and their allies use to manipulate medical science and public perception: First, medical ghostwriting has become standard practice-pharmaceutical companies write articles promoting their drugs, then pay "independent" doctors to sign their names as authors in medical journals. Wyeth-Ayerst hired Excerpta Medica to produce nine articles promoting its diet drug Redux (later pulled from the market), while Merck used ghostwriters to market Vioxx. These articles emphasized benefits while downplaying risks of drugs eventually restricted or removed due to serious safety concerns. Second, drug companies maintain stables of "hired gun" experts who reliably defend their products without disclosing financial relationships. When investigating Crestor's safety concerns, every doctor who contacted me or appeared in newspaper articles defending the drug had undisclosed financial ties to AstraZeneca. The company even pressured CBS executives through advertising channels, with a CBS sales boss warning that my stories "could really harm [CBS's ad] business." Third, pharmaceutical companies deliberately obscure unfavorable data in FDA applications. They employ tactics like burying adverse events by splitting them into smaller subcategories (as with Rezulin's liver damage), blaming side effects on patients' preexisting conditions, manipulating data through selective analysis, and publishing only positive studies while suppressing negative ones. Fourth, companies maintain tight control over research data, preventing publication of negative results through restrictive contracts. Dr. James Kahn was sued for $7 million by Immune Response after publishing negative findings about their AIDS vaccine in JAMA without the company's approval. Though medical journals collectively defended him in 2002 with a joint editorial condemning pharmaceutical influence over research, company control has only grown more heavy-handed since. Fifth, medical journals routinely publish manipulated information, with research showing roughly one-third of neuroscience studies and one-fourth of medical studies are fabricated or plagiarized. Dr. Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, famously declared in 2009 that "it is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published." Sixth, research funding heavily favors studies likely to generate corporate profits while crucial public health investigations go unfunded. Companies rarely support research that might reveal negative aspects of their products, and when damaging studies emerge, industry and government typically fund multiple counter-studies to negate the findings. Seventh, pharmaceutical companies have repeatedly engaged in criminal behavior affecting global health. Since 2010, pharmaceutical settlements have exceeded $80 billion, with Johnson & Johnson leading with over 45 violations totaling $24.5 billion. Between 2003-2016, 85% of top pharmaceutical firms paid penalties for illegal activities, suggesting that deception, kickbacks, and hiding safety risks are standard industry practices. Eighth, a vast network of seemingly independent entities secretly collaborate to influence public perception of health matters. The nonprofit "Every Child By Two" (now "Vaccinate Your Family") presents itself as independent while receiving funding from vaccine manufacturers and having industry representatives in leadership positions. Similarly, a 2023 Yale University study revealed 74% of high-revenue patient advocacy organizations have leadership tied to pharmaceutical companies. Ninth, reference books like The Merck Manual, described as "the pediatric Bible," are published by pharmaceutical companies themselves, presenting biased information while claiming editorial independence. Merck's Manual falsely states "No serious side effects have been reported" for Gardasil, contradicting the vaccine's own FDA label listing numerous severe reactions including death. Finally, pharmaceutical companies exploit regulatory loopholes to avoid disclosing risks. While prescription drug ads must disclose risks, vaccine commercials often mention none at all because vaccine makers categorize their ads as "disease awareness ads." As long as they don't mention a specific brand, these ads are considered "educational" and exempt from risk disclosure requirements.

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

轻松跟读，《跟着科学走》摘要中的每个词都会随音频实时高亮。

第 7 章

The Vaccine Controversy: Science's "Third Rail"

Questioning vaccine safety triggers unprecedented pushback unlike any other investigative topic. While no one calls reporters "anti-car" for exposing dangerous vehicles or "anti-medicine" for investigating drug risks, those who raise legitimate vaccine safety questions are immediately branded "anti-vaccine"-a propaganda tactic that silences critical inquiry. This suppression is particularly cruel to parents of vaccine-injured children who are smeared despite having actually vaccinated their children. The government sometimes threatens to withdraw court-awarded payments if these parents speak out. This suppression of safety questions undermines both science and public health, as all medicines have side effects that should be thoroughly studied to make vaccination programs safer and more effective. After extensive research, I've compiled fifteen shocking vaccine-related facts that contradict the official narrative. The DPT vaccine (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus) that many received as children caused seizures and brain damage in some children, with the US Institute of Medicine confirming in 1994 that "the balance of evidence is consistent with a causal relation between DPT" and brain damage. This led to lawsuits awarding up to $5 million per injured child. By the early 1980s, DPT vaccine makers faced so many brain damage lawsuits they threatened to stop production unless Congress protected them from liability. The resulting 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created an unprecedented "vaccine court" with unique rules favoring manufacturers. Most claims are rejected, though $5 billion has been paid to over 10,600 successful claimants. Astonishingly, taxpayer-funded Department of Justice lawyers defend vaccine makers, while damages come not from manufacturers but from fees charged to patients on each vaccine dose. America's dramatic spike in autism cases directly coincides with the tripling of childhood vaccinations since 1983. By the early 2000s, autism claims flooded the vaccine court, threatening financial disaster for the industry. The government has actually conceded that vaccines triggered autism in children with undiagnosed vulnerabilities like mitochondrial disorders or tuberous sclerosis. Beyond autism, vaccines have been linked to numerous immune disorders including juvenile diabetes, Crohn's disease, POTS, arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and inflammatory conditions. In 2018, the government's own top medical expert witness, Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, came forward with a stunning sworn statement. He revealed that in 2007, he had privately informed Department of Justice lawyers that "vaccinations could cause autism" in some children, and that he had personally treated such patients. The DOJ immediately dismissed him as their expert witness and, according to Zimmerman, subsequently misrepresented his views in court. Meanwhile, autism rates have skyrocketed to 1 in 36 eight-year-olds according to the CDC's own admission-yet officials continue to normalize this epidemic rather than declaring a public health emergency to identify potential causes.

第 8 章

COVID-19: The Ultimate Betrayal of Public Trust

When President Biden contracted COVID twice in July 2022 despite being fully vaccinated and boosted, he exemplified the lapses, confusion, and government misinformation characterizing America's COVID response. Despite Biden, Dr. Fauci, Pfizer CEO Dr. Bourla, and CDC Director Dr. Walensky all insisting vaccines would prevent COVID, by October 2022 they collectively had nineteen shots and nine COVID infections among them. The government's propaganda promoting "COVID-vaccines-at-any-cost" ultimately undermined public confidence in America's vaccination program and health authorities. Early evidence revealed that the "isolate at home" guidance actually spread COVID-19, as people without symptoms stayed indoors, sharing breathing space with family for extended periods. In May 2020, New York governor Andrew Cuomo revealed shocking data: 66% of new COVID hospital admissions had been sheltering at home, with another 21% from group living facilities. Officials consistently exaggerated COVID's fatality rate through basic mathematical errors. Calculating a disease's death rate requires dividing deaths by the total number of infected people-including those with mild or no symptoms. Instead, authorities routinely used only confirmed cases (those who tested positive) as the denominator, artificially inflating the death rate. Stanford University researchers pointed out this error, noting that Italy's publicized 8% fatality rate was likely closer to 0.06% when properly calculated. Public health officials catastrophically denied natural immunity's power against COVID, despite early scientific predictions that it would work better than vaccines-as has historically been the case with illnesses. Even Dr. Fauci initially acknowledged natural immunity before pivoting to exclusively promote vaccines. When natural immunity's superiority became evident in scientific literature, vaccine interests manipulated data to make vaccines appear more effective by ignoring natural immunity's role. As COVID vaccines failed to prevent infection, transmission, symptoms, or serious illness, vaccine proponents resorted to redefining terminology. When COVID vaccines failed to meet the traditional definition of "vaccine," the CDC simply changed the definition itself, removing the phrase "protecting the person from that disease" and replacing it with merely "stimulate the body's immune response"-an Orwellian redefinition executed without explanation or public discussion. The hydroxychloroquine debate exemplifies how politics and money corrupted medical science during the pandemic. While President Trump suggested studying this decades-old safe malaria drug for COVID-19 use, media outlets portrayed it as dangerous quackery despite its long safety record. This campaign served two purposes: building demand for upcoming vaccines and discrediting Trump during his reelection campaign. Of the government's COVID treatment advisory panel, about one-third reported links to drug companies-with nine explicitly naming Gilead, remdesivir's manufacturer. Beyond these eleven, nine others, including two committee leaders, had undisclosed Gilead ties-some even serving on Gilead's advisory board. Meanwhile, zero panel members reported financial links to hydroxychloroquine, a cheap generic drug that wouldn't generate billions for any pharmaceutical company.

从《跟着科学走》摘要中收获更多

每日获取新洞见，探索 10 万+ 条课程内容
文字实时高亮，与音频同步
保存你的书库，在所有设备上随时访问

第 9 章

The Emerging Health Crisis No One Is Addressing

The worst emerging health crisis manipulated by scientific misinformation involves illnesses grouped under "Long COVID" and "Long Vax"-more accurately characterized as spike protein and microclot disorders. By 2024, up to 25% of adults showed Long COVID symptoms, yet public accounts omit that most affected people were vaccinated, suggesting vaccines may cause or worsen these conditions. Despite this national health emergency, there's no cohesive action plan or major initiative to educate doctors. Media coverage spins the dangers to promote vaccination while omitting warnings that each dose may increase risk. Independent researchers find these illnesses can surface long after infection clears, as the spike protein (from both virus and vaccines) triggers inflammation, immunity and blood problems, causing diverse symptoms from vision problems to heart attacks. Dr. Jordan Vaughn, an internal medicine specialist and CEO of MedHelp Clinics, discovered that patients were suffering from abnormal blood-clotting issues-microclots too tiny to detect on regular scans. By treating these hidden clots, patients experienced remarkable improvements. His clinic has treated over 1,100 patients with Long COVID or Long Vax symptoms, from teenagers to nonagenarians. In December 2020, Harvard-affiliated pediatric specialist Dr. Patrick Whelan warned the FDA that the spike protein created by COVID vaccines could damage organs throughout the body. He cautioned that while preventing COVID would be beneficial, "it would be vastly worse if hundreds of millions of people were to suffer long-lasting or even permanent damage to their brain or heart microvasculature as an unintended effect of vaccines." His warnings were ignored, demonstrating how compromised our medical safety systems have become.

第 10 章

Finding Truth in a World of Medical Propaganda

Despite the COVID crisis, no public health officials have apologized or acknowledged mistakes, and our broken health systems continue receiving billions in funding increases. Meanwhile, Americans grow sicker, more medicated, and more chronically ill under the watch of the world's best-funded public health system. Fortunately, there are practical steps to fight back against this distorted medical system. First, identify who proved accurate during COVID controversies and give their voices greater weight on emerging health issues. Conversely, apply skepticism to authorities who gave damaging advice. When highly publicized "fact checks" and officials parrot identical talking points, it signals powerful interests manipulating the narrative. Trust your cognitive dissonance when surrounded by people insisting "up is down." Remember that censorship advocates are rarely on the right side of history. Watch for propaganda terms like "discredited," "debunked," "quackery," "conspiracy theory," or calling targets "nutjobs," "cranks," "deniers," or "-phobic." Claims that "science is settled" are another red flag, as no genuine scientist would use such terminology or shut down scientific discussion. Be wary when internet searches yield suspiciously homogeneous results or when multiple "fact-checks" use similar language to reach identical conclusions. When dozens of writers simultaneously use the same phrases and arguments, it suggests orchestration rather than independent analysis. Rather than eliminating information sources, expand your intake. Staying versed in false narratives helps identify trustworthy information through comparison. Understanding propaganda makes recognizing truth easier. The propagandists win when we remain silent and complacent. Armed with reliable information sources, you can become an advocate for open discussion on topics they seek to control. Participate in dialogues to normalize questioning the "official truth." Challenge biased studies by raising questions on social media and contacting medical journal editors to pursue corrections or retractions. Most critically, report any adverse reactions to medicines or vaccines. The system depends on proper documentation, yet most doctors fail to report these events. For non-vaccine medicines, use MedWatch. For vaccines, use the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Remember, scientists estimate each reported adverse event represents between 1,000 to 100,000 unreported cases.

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

轻松跟读，《跟着科学走》摘要中的每个词都会随音频实时高亮。

第 11 章

The Personal Journey to Medical Truth

My journey toward medical enlightenment represents just the tip of the iceberg, but I've tried to condense it into a meaningful roadmap that can guide you through this deep rabbit hole of interconnected revelations. I grew up with unquestioning faith in medicine-my parent and brother earned medical degrees. As a patient, I trusted that doctors and government officials would never lie. As a parent, I believed medical experts prioritized my child's health above all else, administering every recommended vaccine without question. As a young reporter, I accepted the medical establishment's messaging without scrutiny, viewing scientific research as pure and beyond questioning. Like many journalists, I allowed preconceived notions to drive my reporting-a significant flaw in our profession. True journalism requires letting go of personal biases, opening our minds to learn more, and cutting through the powerful propaganda machine that permeates our lives. The most rewarding intellectual exercise is admitting when we're wrong and adjusting our understanding accordingly. This journey transformed my professional life, revealing how money and profits drive virtually every public health decision. I've learned that government officials, doctors, medical associations, researchers, and nonprofits routinely mislead and lie, with health scandals involving the same components as others I've investigated: cover-ups, greed, profits, and lies. Though discovering these truths about public health can be unsettling, you're taking control of your health and that of your family. While some may find comfort in delusion, millions are awakening as propaganda tactics backfire. The path to medical truth is difficult but ultimately rewarding-and may be the most important journey you ever undertake.

★★★★★

你已读完《跟着科学走》摘要

“坚持使用 23 天了，我每天都会打开它。它现在已经成为我的日常习惯。”

jayallen

《跟着科学走》摘要中的核心主题

pharmaceutical industry corruption
medical ethics violations
regulatory agency capture
scientific research manipulation
public health propaganda

《跟着科学走》摘要精选金句

This collective awakening may be our path to redemption.
The bad actors finally went too far.
Propaganda controlling narratives.
The system is so thoroughly corrupted.
Science has been corrupted by profit motives.

《跟着科学走》摘要中的人物

Sharyl AttkissonAuthor and investigative journalist
Dr. Peter GøtzscheDanish physician and medical critic
Rachel LacyArmy Reservist whose death was linked to vaccines
Dr. Michael CaromePublic Citizen doctor who critiqued medical ethics
Sharrissa CookMother involved in the SUPPORT Baby Oxygen study

关于作者

《Follow the Science》一书的作者雪莉·阿特基森（Sharyl Attkisson）曾五次荣获艾美奖，是《纽约时报》畅销书作家，以其对媒体偏见和政府问责的无畏报道而闻名。作为爱德华·默罗奖（Edward R. Murrow Award）的获得者，她在哥伦比亚广播公司新闻台（CBS News）和有线电视新闻网（CNN）工作了三十多年。在那里，她对班加西袭击事件和“速度与激情”丑闻等争议事件的调查，巩固了她挑战权势机构的声誉。她的作品经常涉及科学诚信和机构透明度等主题，反映了她职业生涯中致力于揭露被掩盖真相的坚持。

阿特基森备受好评的著作，包括《The Smear》和《Stonewalled》，深入剖析了媒体操纵和政治审查。她主持辛克莱广播集团（Sinclair）的全国联播调查节目《Full Measure》，而她关于媒体操纵和虚假新闻的 TEDx 演讲已获得 340 万次观看。

作为跆拳道黑带五段和佛罗里达大学新闻系校友，她设立了一项调查新闻奖，以指导新兴记者。她对问责制的不懈追求塑造了公共舆论，并激励了新一代记者。

下载《跟着科学走》摘要

免费获取《跟着科学走》摘要的 PDF 或 EPUB 版本。可打印或随时离线阅读。

用户还喜欢

Ben Goldacre

Charles Piller

Marty Makary

Naomi Oreskes & Erik M. Conway

Estrogeneration

Anthony G. Jay

Feeding You Lies

Vani Hari

Pharmaceutical Sales Ethics: What Nobody Talks About 书籍封面

The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Sales: Navigating Ethical Dilemmas - Bruno Taddei

The Dilemma of Pharmaceutical Promotion Practices: A Conversation with Dr. Aaron Kesselheim - HUHPR

6 sources

Pharmaceutical Sales Ethics: What Nobody Talks About

Silent Fire

Shilpa Ravella

关于《跟着科学走》摘要的常见问题

发现更多

学习计划

The Science of Us

Understanding the psychological architecture of our bonds is essential for moving beyond surface-level conflict. This plan is designed for individuals and couples seeking to replace destructive patterns with evidence-based dynamics for a more resilient and authentic connection.

1 h 45 m•4 章节

学习计划

Becoming Supernatural: The Science of Self-Transformation

This learning plan bridges the gap between ancient wisdom and modern science for those seeking radical personal change. It is ideal for individuals looking to transcend their current limitations by mastering the intersection of neuroscience, biology, and mindfulness.

1 h 30 m•3 章节

学习计划

The Chernobyl Forensic Files

This plan offers a multi-disciplinary deep dive into the 1986 disaster, blending engineering, history, and environmental science. It is essential for history buffs, safety engineers, and policy students seeking to understand the intersection of technology and systemic failure.

1 h 30 m•4 章节

学习计划

The Cosmic Thread: Science of Connection

This learning plan bridges the gap between astrophysics, biology, and ecology to reveal our profound interconnectedness with the universe. It is ideal for curious minds, nature enthusiasts, and anyone seeking a science-based understanding of their place in the natural world.

1 h 30 m•3 章节

学习计划

Dismantle Fallacies and Debate Unshakable

In an era of misinformation and polarized discourse, the ability to think critically is a vital survival skill. This plan is designed for professionals, activists, and students who need to defend their ideas against manipulative rhetoric and master the art of persuasive communication.

1 h 45 m•3 章节

学习计划

The Neurobiology of Unstoppable Growth

This plan is essential for leaders and high-performers who want to leverage brain science to overcome burnout and stagnation. It bridges the gap between biological reality and professional excellence, making it ideal for anyone navigating high-pressure environments.

1 h 30 m•3 章节

学习计划

Unshakable: The Art of Emotional Detachment

In an era of constant social pressure, mastering emotional boundaries is essential for mental clarity. This plan is designed for individuals who feel drained by others' moods or struggle with social overthinking.

1 h 30 m•3 章节

学习计划

Neurohacking for Radical Agency

This plan is essential for high-performers struggling with digital distraction and professional stagnation. It is designed for individuals looking to reclaim their cognitive sovereignty and transform their self-concept through evidence-based neurobiology.

2 h•4 章节

由哥伦比亚大学校友创建源自旧金山

BeFreed 汇聚全球求知若渴的学习者

4.7

平均评分

7,840+ 条 App 评分

BeFreed Community

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

查看更多网络上关于 BeFreed 的讨论

由哥伦比亚大学校友创建源自旧金山

BeFreed 汇聚全球求知若渴的学习者

4.7

平均评分

7,840+ 条 App 评分

BeFreed Community

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

查看更多网络上关于 BeFreed 的讨论

开启你的学习之旅，就是现在

第 6 章

《跟着科学走》摘要

《跟着科学走》摘要概述

用不同学习方式探索《跟着科学走》摘要

When Science Becomes a Weapon: Unmasking the Hidden Forces Behind Medical "Truth"

The Manufactured Reality of Modern Medicine

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

Down the Rabbit Hole: A Journalist's Awakening

The Corruption of Medical Research

从《跟着科学走》摘要中收获更多

The Pharmaceutical Industry's Control Mechanisms

The Hidden Mechanisms of Scientific Manipulation

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

The Vaccine Controversy: Science's "Third Rail"

COVID-19: The Ultimate Betrayal of Public Trust

从《跟着科学走》摘要中收获更多

The Emerging Health Crisis No One Is Addressing

Finding Truth in a World of Medical Propaganda

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

The Personal Journey to Medical Truth

你已读完《跟着科学走》摘要

《跟着科学走》摘要中的核心主题

《跟着科学走》摘要精选金句

《跟着科学走》摘要中的人物

关于作者

下载《跟着科学走》摘要

用户还喜欢

关于《跟着科学走》摘要的常见问题

What is Follow the Science by Sharyl Attkisson about?

Who should read Follow the Science?

Is Follow the Science worth reading?

What evidence does Sharyl Attkisson present about pharmaceutical industry corruption?

发现更多

BeFreed 汇聚全球求知若渴的学习者

BeFreed 汇聚全球求知若渴的学习者

用不同学习方式探索《跟着科学走》摘要

When Science Becomes a Weapon: Unmasking the Hidden Forces Behind Medical "Truth"

The Manufactured Reality of Modern Medicine

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

Down the Rabbit Hole: A Journalist's Awakening

The Corruption of Medical Research

从《跟着科学走》摘要中收获更多

The Pharmaceutical Industry's Control Mechanisms

The Hidden Mechanisms of Scientific Manipulation

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

The Vaccine Controversy: Science's "Third Rail"

COVID-19: The Ultimate Betrayal of Public Trust

从《跟着科学走》摘要中收获更多

The Emerging Health Crisis No One Is Addressing

Finding Truth in a World of Medical Propaganda

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

The Personal Journey to Medical Truth

你已读完《跟着科学走》摘要

用户还喜欢

发现更多