What is Doctored by Charles Piller about?

*Doctored* by Charles Piller exposes widespread fraud and institutional corruption in Alzheimer's disease research. The book investigates manipulated data, corporate greed, and regulatory failures that derailed progress toward a cure. It centers on whistleblower Matthew Schrag's discovery of falsified studies supporting the amyloid hypothesis—a flawed theory that dominated research for decades. Piller argues these deceptions betrayed patients and wasted billions in resources.

Who should read Doctored by Charles Piller?

This book is essential for medical professionals, policymakers, and anyone affected by Alzheimer’s disease. Researchers will gain insights into scientific integrity, while fans of investigative journalism (like *Empire of Pain*) will appreciate its gripping narrative. It’s also critical for those questioning pharmaceutical ethics or regulatory oversight in healthcare. Families navigating Alzheimer’s will find it both enlightening and alarming.

Is Doctored by Charles Piller worth reading?

Yes, *Doctored* is a vital, award-winning exposé. Named an *Economist* Best Book of 2025, it combines forensic rigor with human tragedy, revealing how scientific fraud delayed Alzheimer’s breakthroughs. Piller’s investigation into manipulated data and institutional arrogance offers lessons in accountability, making it indispensable for understanding medical ethics. The narrative is praised as a "riveting must-read master class."

Who is Charles Piller, the author of Doctored?

Charles Piller is an award-winning investigative journalist for *Science* magazine, specializing in scientific misconduct. Prior to *Doctored*, he reported for the *Los Angeles Times* and *STAT*, uncovering public health failures globally. His accolades include the AAAS/Kavli Science Journalism Award and NIHCM Trade Journalism honors. Piller’s earlier books address biological warfare and societal trust in technology.

What is the amyloid hypothesis in Alzheimer's research?

The amyloid hypothesis claims Alzheimer’s is caused by amyloid protein plaques in the brain. *Doctored* reveals how this theory was propped up by fraudulent studies, including Sylvain Lesné’s 2006 paper with manipulated images. Piller shows how the hypothesis diverted funding from promising alternatives, delaying effective treatments despite evidence contradicting its validity.

Who is Matthew Schrag in Doctored?

Matthew Schrag is a Vanderbilt University neurologist and the book’s central whistleblower. His forensic analysis exposed falsified data in Alzheimer’s studies, including Lesné’s work and Cassava Sciences’ drug simufilam. Piller portrays Schrag as a hero who risked his career to challenge institutional power, embodying scientific integrity against systemic corruption.

What role did Sylvain Lesné play in the Alzheimer's scandal?

Sylvain Lesné, a neuroscientist at the University of Minnesota, authored a seminal 2006 study linking amyloid proteins to Alzheimer’s symptoms. *Doctored* details how his research contained doctored images that misled the scientific community for years. The paper’s retraction undermined the amyloid hypothesis and highlighted lax peer-review processes.

How does Doctored critique Big Pharma and regulators?

Piller condemns pharmaceutical companies for prioritizing profit over patients, citing Cassava Sciences’ promotion of simufilam despite data irregularities. He also rebukes regulatory bodies like the FDA and NIH for ignoring fraud red flags, enabling trials on vulnerable patients. The book argues that financial incentives and institutional inertia perpetuated false hopes.

《造假医学》摘要

阿尔茨海默病治愈探索中的欺诈、傲慢与悲剧

查尔斯·皮勒

3.98(452 Reviews)

《造假医学》摘要概述

《造假》（*Doctored*）揭露了一场震惊阿尔茨海默病研究界的十亿美元科学欺诈案，揭示了数百篇论文背后被操纵的数据。作为《经济学人》评选出的“2025年度最佳图书”，这部调查性的重磅著作提出了一个问题：造假的科学是如何影响数百万弱势患者的治疗方案的？

选择讲述方式

用不同学习方式探索《造假医学》摘要

来自《造假医学》的相同理念。选择适合你的声音、深度和节奏，随时切换。

第 1 章

When Science Betrays: The Alzheimer's Deception

In the quiet corridors of research labs across America, a devastating fraud has unfolded-one that has cost billions in wasted resources and delayed hope for millions suffering from one of humanity's most terrible afflictions. Charles Piller's "Doctored" pulls back the curtain on how the quest to understand and treat Alzheimer's disease became corrupted by fabricated data, conflicts of interest, and institutional failures. The book has become required reading in medical ethics courses at Harvard and Stanford, with Bill Gates calling it "a wake-up call for how we fund and evaluate scientific research." The investigation began with a single whistleblower's discovery but expanded into a shocking expose of how the dominant theory of Alzheimer's disease-the amyloid hypothesis-has been propped up by questionable research while alternative approaches were systematically sidelined. As we face an aging population with Alzheimer's cases projected to triple by 2050, this scientific scandal carries implications far beyond academia.

第 2 章

The Price of Hope: A Family's Alzheimer's Journey

Stephen Price, a 74-year-old retired construction contractor from rural New Jersey, is losing himself piece by piece to Alzheimer's disease. Six years into his diagnosis, he enrolled in a clinical trial for simufilam, an experimental drug that promised not just to slow his decline but potentially reverse it-a holy grail in Alzheimer's treatment. His son Matt, a Harvard-trained epidemiologist, accompanies him to appointments, watching with scientific understanding and personal heartbreak as his father struggles with daily tasks that once came naturally. "I have to handle things differently," Stephen explains, describing how interruptions now derail his thoughts completely. His wife Toni has adapted their home and routines to accommodate his changing abilities, while living with the knowledge that Stephen carries two copies of the APOE4 gene-dramatically increasing not only his Alzheimer's risk but potentially his children's as well. This genetic reality drives Stephen's participation in clinical trials. "He's doing it for society," Matt explains, "and for future patients who might include his own children." Before simufilam, Stephen had participated in a psilocybin trial at Johns Hopkins that temporarily helped him accept his illness and alleviated his depression when conventional medications failed. Matt described it as "among the most meaningful experiences" in his father's life. Simufilam offered an entirely different kind of hope. The drug supposedly repairs filamin A, a brain protein that can block amyloid-beta plaques-widely considered hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease. If successful, it might slow or even reverse Stephen's cognitive decline, allowing him to recapture aspects of himself that were slipping away. But as months passed in the trial, Stephen's condition continued deteriorating. After eighteen months, he struggled with basic cognitive tasks-remembering simple words, drawing shapes, recalling the day or his location. Though he maintained some routines like Tai Chi, his independence was rapidly diminishing. Sometimes he looked confused about which end of a fork to hold. The family continued supporting his independence while recognizing the painful reality that "what's possible for him is shrinking." The evidence was clear: Alzheimer's was winning, and simufilam was failing.

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

轻松跟读，《造假医学》摘要中的每个词都会随音频实时高亮。

第 3 章

The Unlikely Whistleblower: Matthew Schrag's Journey

In his modest Vanderbilt University office, neurologist and neuroscientist Matthew Schrag maintains a small medical museum of antique reflex hammers, medical manuals, and an old microscope-tributes to medicine's long history of scientific inquiry. A sign on his desk declares "Everything Is Figureoutable," though Alzheimer's disease has thus far defied this optimistic motto. This personal collection reflects not just his passion for medical history, but his belief in the methodical progression of scientific understanding. Unlike many elite researchers, Schrag's scientific journey began humbly at the University of North Dakota-a stark contrast to the Harvard pedigrees common in his field. Under neuropharmacologist Othman Ghribi, he learned western blot analysis-a technique that separates proteins by size to reveal their presence in tissue samples. This seemingly technical skill would later prove crucial in his scientific investigations. During these formative years, Schrag developed a meticulous attention to detail and a fundamental understanding of protein analysis that would set him apart from his peers. After completing his rigorous training at Yale, where he further honed his expertise in neurodegenerative diseases, Schrag established himself at Vanderbilt in 2015. There, he focused on cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA)-a condition where amyloid plaques attack blood vessels in the brain and which affects approximately 85-95% of Alzheimer's patients. His lab features striking fluorescent images of diseased brain tissue, displaying what he calls "great beauty within disease and death." Through thousands of hours examining western blots and microscopic images, Schrag developed an intimate understanding of what scientific data should look like, including subtle patterns and irregularities that others might miss. Despite the scientific community's long-held belief that science "self-corrects," Schrag recognized a troubling reality: revolutionary but false findings can persist for years without proper scrutiny, leading to wasted resources and even human suffering. He observed how the academic system actively disincentivizes replication efforts, as "negative results" are difficult to publish and can damage a researcher's career prospects. This systemic flaw particularly concerned him in Alzheimer's research, where billions of dollars and countless patient hopes hung in the balance. When approached about investigating Cassava Sciences' simufilam research in 2021, Schrag immediately spotted suspect images but worried about career consequences. The irregularities he noticed included duplicated gel bands and manipulated images that suggested data manipulation. Despite the modest $18,000 payment and significant personal risk to his career and reputation, he ultimately felt compelled to act because a drug seemingly based on misconduct was being administered to hundreds of Alzheimer's patients in clinical trials. "This is my scientific space," he explained when asked why he'd blown the whistle, adding that his position as an Alzheimer's researcher gave him both the expertise and moral obligation to speak up. "The most important thing is that we get all of this right because many people's lives depend on it." His decision to come forward would not only challenge a billion-dollar pharmaceutical company but also spark a broader conversation about scientific integrity in Alzheimer's research.

第 4 章

The Olympic Scientist: Lindsay Burns and Cassava Sciences

Lindsay Burns emerged from the remote ranchlands of Big Timber, Montana with exceptional drive and talent. Born to a family that balanced western ranching heritage with East Coast education, Burns showed competitive spirit from an early age-winning local sack races at seven and conducting tree surveys at ten. Following family tradition, she attended Milton Academy and then Harvard, where she excelled in both psychobiology and rowing. Despite her lightweight status (under 130 pounds), Burns showed extraordinary determination in rowing-competing through a cracked rib, practicing on weekends by scaling the boathouse walls, and eventually winning a silver medal at the 1996 Atlanta Olympics. Her hometown celebrated with "Lindsay Burns Day," honoring her unbridled determination and competitive drive that would later characterize her scientific work. After her Olympic success, Burns turned to drug development, joining Pain Therapeutics in 2002. Led by CEO Remi Barbier (whom she later married), the company focused on developing "Remoxy," an abuse-deterrent oxycodone formulation. Burns formed a crucial research partnership with Hoau-Yan Wang, a CUNY professor with expertise in brain dopamine receptors. Together, they focused on filamin A, a brain protein affecting opioid receptors, ultimately sharing fourteen patents. When Pain Therapeutics faced failure after the FDA repeatedly rejected Remoxy, Barbier desperately needed a new direction. Wang and Burns provided it: repurposing their filamin A research for Alzheimer's disease. While most experts believe Alzheimer's involves tau tangles inside neurons and amyloid-beta plaques between cells, Wang and Burns proposed a novel hypothesis-claiming misfolded filamin A causes inflammation and promotes formation of these problematic proteins. Barbier quickly pivoted, renaming the company "Cassava Sciences"-oddly chosen from the street where he and Burns lived, despite cassava root being falsely touted as a brain-health remedy while some varieties actually contain cyanide. Wang's research methods bordered on the fantastical. He claimed to revivify frozen brain tissue-some preserved for years-to test simufilam's effects. This "zombie science" supposedly showed the drug countering Alzheimer's by addressing insulin resistance in the brain. Respected scientists found the claims implausible-"It's hard for me to imagine how you could get any life from that tissue," noted UCSF's Roger Nicoll. Yet Wang attracted elite coauthors from institutions like Harvard and Rush University, lending credibility to his work. When Cassava's early clinical trial of simufilam initially failed, with the drug showing no reduction in tau or other Alzheimer's biomarkers, the stock plummeted 75% overnight. Months later, Barbier blamed "mistakes" by a lab contractor and announced a miraculous turnaround-not only had biomarkers improved, but patients showed memory improvements after just one month. The company's market value skyrocketed to $5.4 billion, making the Barbier-Burns family worth $147 million on paper.

从《造假医学》摘要中收获更多

每日获取新洞见，探索 10 万+ 条课程内容
文字实时高亮，与音频同步
保存你的书库，在所有设备上随时访问

第 5 章

The French Connection: Sylvain Lesne's Rise and Fall

In France's coastal Luc-sur-Mer, Sylvain Lesne grew up amid D-Day history, developing both ambition and a gambling spirit reflected in the town's casino culture. Handsome, athletic, and fluent in English, Lesne became a popular ambassador for Alzheimer's research while his graduate work garnered over a thousand citations-extraordinary early influence. Twenty years before the scandal broke, Denis Vivien, one of Lesne's PhD advisors, discovered troubling evidence when Lesne submitted immunostaining images that looked "too beautiful" to be real. When another student couldn't replicate Lesne's findings, Vivien confronted him. Despite Lesne's denial of wrongdoing, Vivien withdrew the paper before publication "to preserve my scientific integrity" and severed contact with Lesne. Though Vivien implemented lab audit systems afterward, he never warned the wider scientific community or Lesne's other mentors. Without speaking to anyone from Caen, Karen Ashe, an illustrious Alzheimer's researcher at the University of Minnesota, hired Lesne as a postdoctoral fellow in 2002-a decision that would later profoundly impact both their careers and Alzheimer's research itself. Ashe, born to high-achieving Chinese immigrants, had an extraordinary pedigree-graduating from Harvard at 17 and completing both an MD and PhD within a decade. Her scientific brilliance was evident early, from her childhood brain-shaped school project to becoming the first Asian American at St. Paul Academy. Ashe's groundbreaking work with Stanley Prusiner on prions contributed to his Nobel Prize, and her development of transgenic mice that produced human amyloid proteins revolutionized Alzheimer's research. The synergy between Ashe's scientific genius and Lesne's experimental prowess proved electric-she recognized his talent for isolating amyloid oligomers and promoted him as "brilliant." Together they achieved remarkable breakthroughs, including Ashe's stunning discovery that mice could actually recover memory after tau protein production was halted. Then came the breathtaking moment that captured the field's imagination: Ashe and Lesne discovered A*56, a previously unknown amyloid-beta oligomer. When purified from mouse brains and injected into rats, it instantly impaired their memory. Published in Nature, the finding was hailed as "the first substance ever identified in brain tissue in Alzheimer's research that has been shown to cause memory impairment." The discovery provided crucial support for the amyloid hypothesis when skepticism was mounting. Leading experts called it "clearly a key finding," while Sam Gandy predicted it would become "the target" for research. Less than two weeks after publication, Ashe won the $100,000 Potamkin Prize, and later received a $5 million donation for her research center. Lesne was promoted to assistant professor with his own NIH-funded lab.

第 6 章

The Amyloid Mafia: How a Hypothesis Became Dogma

In November 2022, Harvard professor Dennis Selkoe, one of the most celebrated Alzheimer's researchers, confronted Piller over lunch about media pessimism regarding anti-amyloid drugs. With remarkable verbal acumen and persuasiveness, Selkoe claimed to be "on the right side of history," noting he had waited decades for "objective evidence" that reducing amyloid improves cognitive outcomes. The "amyloid mafia" describes influential figures who steer funding and opportunities toward the amyloid hypothesis while marginalizing alternatives. Former NIH director Zaven Khachaturian called it "an infallible belief system" where scientists "accept an idea as infallible." Following the 2006 Lesne-Ashe paper in Nature, NIH funding for oligomer research exploded from nearly zero to $333 million by 2021, with amyloid-related projects receiving $1.5 billion of the $3 billion Alzheimer's budget. Despite authoring over 1,100 scholarly articles cited more than 75,000 times, George Perry, editor of the Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and a prominent skeptic of the amyloid hypothesis, hasn't been invited to speak at major Alzheimer's conferences in recent years. Many scientists describe career obstacles when challenging the dominant theory. One researcher received whispered advice to at least pretend her work linked to amyloids in grant proposals. Others found venture capitalists and pharmaceutical companies would only back anti-amyloid approaches. NIH program officers recommended including "pro-amyloid collaborators" in applications, while alternative theories faced publication rejections from top journals. Scientists like Ruth Itzhaki, Robert Moir, and Malu Tansey struggled for funding and recognition when proposing alternative explanations involving herpes virus, microbial causes, or immune responses. Perry believes the amyloid hypothesis persists because its champions seek legacy and recognition: "The major goal of these people is to win-if it isn't the Nobel Prize, it's God's glory." He argues funders favor established amyloid researchers like Selkoe because they're "safe" investments who publish in prestigious journals, creating an avalanche of amyloid-related papers that crowds out alternative approaches. The hypothesis has survived through constant evolution-being called the "amyloid plaque," "amyloid-beta," "amyloid cascade," and "amyloid oligomer" hypotheses-making it, as Stanford's Sudhof notes, impossible to disprove.

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

轻松跟读，《造假医学》摘要中的每个词都会随音频实时高亮。

第 7 章

Blots on a Field: Uncovering Scientific Fraud

In December 2021, Matthew Schrag was developing techniques to quantify image manipulation in scientific papers when he found a paper in the Journal of Neuroscience with suspicious western blots that looked like "flat-bottom smiles." Using NIH-approved software, he colored one band red and another green, then merged them to reveal a perfect match (shown in yellow), with a correlation coefficient of 0.98-virtually identical bands that should represent different experimental conditions. Following this thread, Schrag discovered these manipulations led to Sylvain Lesne at the University of Minnesota, whose name appeared on multiple papers with similar issues. His investigation quickly expanded as he found questionable images in multiple prestigious journals. Most significantly, Schrag discovered problems in Lesne's seminal 2006 Nature paper, co-authored with Karen Ashe, which had introduced amyloid-beta star 56 (A*56) and been cited thousands of times. This paper had reinvigorated the amyloid hypothesis at a moment of despair in the field, redirecting research toward oligomers and away from plaques. If Schrag's suspicions were correct, a key advance in Alzheimer's research was built on fabricated results, potentially undermining the dominant approach to curing the disease. Schrag's findings received powerful validation from leading forensic image analysts. Elisabeth Bik confirmed his concerns that research groups appeared to have composed figures by piecing together parts from different experiments, suggesting data might have been altered to fit hypotheses. Jana Christopher also endorsed Schrag's work, even identifying additional cloned image sections he had missed. Dennis Selkoe served as Piller's "acid test" for evaluating Lesne's apparent misconduct. After reviewing Schrag's dossier, Selkoe confirmed at least "twelve or fifteen images where there is no other explanation" than manipulation, particularly in the landmark 2006 Nature paper. He noted that Lesne's unique system for measuring amyloid-beta oligomers separately in different cellular compartments "made no biochemical sense" to experienced researchers. Despite numerous publications by Lesne and Karen Ashe on A*56, few labs ever successfully detected the protein, with many failing in unpublished attempts. Selkoe worried about the impact of exposing this misconduct on public trust in science, especially after attacks on scientists during the Trump presidency and Covid pandemic, but ultimately concluded: "We need to declare these examples and warn the world." By enhancing contrast on published images, Schrag revealed obvious signs of digital manipulation in the 2006 Nature paper, including use of eraser tools that deleted evidence contradicting assertions about purified A*56. These findings ultimately led to the paper's retraction in 2024, with Ashe and most co-authors acknowledging image doctoring had occurred (only Lesne disagreed).

第 8 章

Systemic Failure: How Institutions Protected Fraud

The investigation into scientific integrity revealed shocking findings about Eliezer Masliah, director of the NIA Division of Neuroscience and one of the world's most powerful Alzheimer's scientists with a $2.6 billion annual budget. A 300-page dossier compiled by researchers identified 132 apparently doctored papers by Masliah-the most for any scientist examined-showing questionable western blots, micrographs, and reused images dating back to 1997. Eleven leading neuroscientists who reviewed the dossier were stunned, with one calling the findings "breathtaking." The questionable research included studies that helped win FDA approval for clinical trials of prasinezumab, a Parkinson's drug that showed no benefit in a recent trial. Masliah's dubious work raises serious questions about the vetting process at NIH, which acknowledged his work was not checked for possible fraud before hiring. When NIH receives misconduct concerns, it conducts preliminary reviews before passing credible cases to the Office of Research Integrity (ORI). However, this process is plagued by delays and opacity. Despite Schrag submitting his Cassava dossier in 2021 and Lesne dossier in 2022, he received no response. Meanwhile, NIH continued funding Lesne's work for five more years, even though the administrator overseeing the grant had co-authored Lesne's suspect 2006 Nature paper. ORI's meager resources-just 37 employees and a $12 million budget to oversee $48 billion in NIH funding-contribute to this ineffectiveness. Universities typically conduct investigations themselves, often gaining extensions that drag cases out indefinitely, with few researchers ever facing penalties for misconduct. The FDA's oversight of clinical trials shows similar weaknesses. A 2020 investigation revealed a light-handed, slow-moving approach to violations, with clear corrections of dangerous practices being rare. The FDA typically requests voluntary corrections rather than taking decisive action, and participants in compromised trials often aren't notified of problems. Critics point to the "revolving door" between the FDA and industry-many senior officials, including Commissioners Rob Califf and Scott Gottlieb, had significant industry ties before or after their FDA tenure. A study found that eleven of sixteen FDA medical examiners who worked on twenty-eight drug approvals later became employees or consultants for the companies they regulated. The Aduhelm approval exemplifies how corporate influence can compromise FDA oversight. Biogen donated heavily to patient advocacy groups that pressured the FDA, while maintaining a cozy relationship with the agency. Billy Dunn, the FDA's top regulator for Alzheimer's drugs, worked closely with Biogen through back channels to secure approval. After shepherding both Aduhelm and its successor Leqembi through approval, Dunn left the FDA to become an industry consultant and join the board of Prothena, an anti-amyloid biopharma company, receiving options for 30,000 shares.

从《造假医学》摘要中收获更多

每日获取新洞见，探索 10 万+ 条课程内容
文字实时高亮，与音频同步
保存你的书库，在所有设备上随时访问

第 9 章

The Path Forward: Innovation and Hope

Despite the dominance of the amyloid hypothesis, alternative approaches are gaining traction. Madhav Thambisetty takes an innovative approach by comparing brain tissues from younger adults with and without Alzheimer's risk factors to tissues from deceased patients. Rather than developing entirely new drugs through costly decades-long trials, he searches for already-approved compounds that might be repurposed to target the abnormalities he identifies. Another radical researcher, Ruth Itzhaki of Oxford, has spent decades investigating links between herpesvirus and Alzheimer's. After years of being marginalized, her infection hypothesis is finally gaining traction with NIH funding jumping to nearly $250 million annually in 2023, with clinical trial results expected by 2026. Prevention offers a bridge from today's difficult reality to future effective treatments. Miguel Arce Renteria focuses on how better treatment systems can forestall Alzheimer's, particularly for Latino Americans who are 1.5 times more likely to develop the disease than whites, and African Americans who suffer at twice the rate. Risk factors like diabetes, high blood pressure, cholesterol, obesity, depression, hearing loss, sedentary lifestyles, and poor diets can be targeted to forestall or moderate Alzheimer's. "Cognitive reserve" can help people function longer despite increasing brain pathology. Higher education can be protective, while poor childhood education increases risk. Though Alzheimer's can afflict anyone, it's also a disease of inequality. In 2024, Matthew Schrag's lab produced 3D animations showing how cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) transforms elegant networks of brain capillaries into gnarly, misshapen tubes with bulbous growths that eventually burst. Schrag believes few diseases of aging have just one cause-if they did, they would appear earlier and more consistently. "It's time for the field to move on," he says, noting many scientists privately want to move past the amyloid hypothesis. Schrag studies inflammation in the brain, blood vessels that do "more than simple plumbing," and lysosomes-cellular structures that digest waste products. He sees hope in the concept that neurodegenerative diseases might be "age-related, lysosomal-storage diseases" that could respond to therapies enhancing lysosomal function. Beyond his research, Schrag treats about 200 Alzheimer's patients yearly, helping them preserve dignity while accepting new realities. He emphasizes the importance of planning transitions like giving up driving or moving to assisted living before crises occur, allowing patients to maintain agency in their own lives. In early 2024, Stephen Price continues his decline despite taking Cassava's simufilam in a clinical trial. His condition has worsened dramatically-he rarely speaks in complete sentences, struggles with basic functions like eating and toileting, and has wandered off dangerously. His wife Toni, 75, recently suffered a minor heart attack that Matt attributes to caregiving stress. Matt feels ethically compromised by enabling his father's continued participation in the trial, especially after learning more about simufilam's scientific problems and the fraud indictment against one of its developers. The experience has taught Matt painful lessons about medical trust and time's preciousness, as he reluctantly explores nursing home options for his father whose agency diminishes daily. Despite the scientific betrayals documented throughout "Doctored," the book ultimately offers hope that by exposing fraud and embracing diverse research approaches, we might finally make meaningful progress against this devastating disease that affects millions worldwide.

★★★★★

你已读完《造假医学》摘要

“坚持使用 23 天了，我每天都会打开它。它现在已经成为我的日常习惯。”

jayallen

《造假医学》摘要中的核心主题

scientific research fraud
medical ethics violations
alzheimer's amyloid hypothesis
clinical trial transparency
academic whistleblower accounts

《造假医学》摘要精选金句

"what's possible for him is shrinking."
"Everything Is Figureoutable,"
"great beauty within disease and death."
science "self-corrects,"
"This is my scientific space,"

《造假医学》摘要中的人物

Charles PillerAuthor and investigative journalist
Matthew SchragVanderbilt neurologist and whistleblower
Stephen PriceRetired contractor and Alzheimer's patient
Matt PriceEpidemiologist and son of Stephen Price
Toni PriceWife and caregiver of Stephen Price

关于作者

查尔斯·皮勒（Charles Piller）是一位屡获殊荣的调查记者和作家，他在其著作《Doctored: Fraud, Arrogance, and Tragedy in the Quest to Cure Alzheimer’s》中探讨了科学诚信问题。

皮勒专注于科学和公共卫生领域，他借鉴了在《科学》（Science）杂志、《STAT》、《洛杉矶时报》（Los Angeles Times）和《萨克拉门托蜜蜂报》（The Sacramento Bee）数十年的报道经验，在这些媒体任职期间，他揭露了生物医学研究中的关键问题。他对阿尔茨海默病研究欺诈的调查——特别是揭露了具有影响力的研究中的图像篡改行为——直接为这本关于科学不端行为的揭秘之作提供了素材。

皮勒早期的著作包括关于军事遗传学的《Gene Wars》（1988年）和关于技术风险的《The Fail-Safe Society》（1993年）。作为公共诚信中心（Center for Public Integrity）的创始董事会成员以及美国科学促进会（AAAS）/卡夫里科学新闻奖（Kavli Journalism Award）的获得者，他的工作曾在美国参议院作证，并影响了全球卫生政策。

《Doctored》由 One Signal/Simon & Schuster 出版，该书将他严谨的调查精神与对医学伦理的深度分析相结合。

下载《造假医学》摘要

免费获取《造假医学》摘要的 PDF 或 EPUB 版本。可打印或随时离线阅读。

用户还喜欢

Follow the Science

Sharyl Attkisson

Bad Science

Ben Goldacre

Blind Spots

Marty Makary

U.S. Medical Experiments and the Betrayal of Trust 书籍封面

Unethical moments in U.S. medical research history - PBS

3 sources

U.S. Medical Experiments and the Betrayal of Trust

Patient H. M.

Luke Dittrich

An American Sickness

Elisabeth Rosenthal

Anatomy of an Epidemic

Robert Whitaker

Every Patient Tells a Story

Lisa Sanders

关于《造假医学》摘要的常见问题

发现更多

学习计划

The Medicine 3.0 Performance Manual

This manual is essential for high-performers and health-conscious individuals seeking to move beyond traditional healthcare. It provides a data-driven framework for extending lifespan through metabolic optimization and advanced preventative screening.

3 h•4 章节

学习计划

Nature's Lethal Ambition

This plan offers a unique look at how humanity has harnessed nature's toxins for power, war, and status. It is ideal for history buffs, science enthusiasts, and true crime fans interested in the dark evolution of toxicology.

1 h 12 m•3 章节

学习计划

The Smart Decade in Medicine

This learning plan explores the frontier where biology meets engineering, detailing the technologies redefining human health. It is essential for healthcare professionals, biotech investors, and tech enthusiasts looking to understand the next decade of medical innovation.

1 h 24 m•4 章节

学习计划

The Science of Self-Sabotage

This plan is essential for high-achievers and chronic caretakers who feel stuck in repetitive patterns of failure or burnout. It offers a deep dive into the neurobiology of behavior, making it ideal for anyone looking to reclaim control over their choices and mental well-being.

30 m•3 章节

学习计划

The Medicine 3.0 Longevity Blueprint

This blueprint is designed for individuals looking to move beyond traditional medicine and take control of their aging process. It is ideal for high-performers and health-conscious learners who want to build a science-backed foundation for lifelong vitality and physical independence.

1 h 45 m•4 章节

学习计划

Master self-deception

In a world full of cognitive shortcuts, understanding how we lie to ourselves is the ultimate competitive advantage. This plan is essential for leaders, decision-makers, and individuals seeking personal growth who want to strip away mental illusions and see reality clearly.

5 h 24 m•4 章节

学习计划

Study MKUltra and manipulation techniques

This plan provides a deep dive into the evolution of psychological control, from historical government experiments to modern digital influence. It is essential for history buffs, psychology students, and anyone concerned with maintaining mental autonomy in an age of data-driven manipulation.

5 h 33 m•4 章节

学习计划

The World's Most Audacious Heists

This plan offers a deep dive into the intersection of high-stakes crime, security engineering, and criminal psychology. It is ideal for true crime enthusiasts, security professionals, and art historians looking to understand the mechanics of the world's most sophisticated thefts.

1 h 30 m•3 章节

由哥伦比亚大学校友创建源自旧金山

BeFreed 汇聚全球求知若渴的学习者

4.7

平均评分

7,840+ 条 App 评分

BeFreed Community

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

查看更多网络上关于 BeFreed 的讨论

由哥伦比亚大学校友创建源自旧金山

BeFreed 汇聚全球求知若渴的学习者

4.7

平均评分

7,840+ 条 App 评分

BeFreed Community

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

查看更多网络上关于 BeFreed 的讨论

开启你的学习之旅，就是现在

第 9 章