What is *What We Owe The Future* about?

*What We Owe The Future* argues for **longtermism**—the view that safeguarding humanity’s long-term potential is a critical moral priority. William MacAskill explores existential risks like AI, climate collapse, and pandemics, while advocating for actions to ensure civilization’s resilience, moral progress, and preparedness for a future dominated by digital minds.

Who should read *What We Owe The Future*?

This book is ideal for readers interested in **ethics, philosophy, or global policy**, particularly those concerned with humanity’s future trajectory. Policymakers, Effective Altruism advocates, and anyone seeking to understand how today’s choices impact tomorrow’s generations will find it transformative.

Is *What We Owe The Future* worth reading?

Widely praised for its **optimistic yet practical** tone, the book offers a compelling case for rethinking humanity’s responsibilities. Reviewers highlight its rigorous research, accessible writing, and ability to inspire actionable change, making it essential for those invested in shaping a better future.

What is longtermism according to William MacAskill?

Longtermism posits that **positively influencing the distant future** is a moral imperative. MacAskill argues that future generations could vastly outnumber us, so reducing existential risks and improving civilizational trajectories today could benefit trillions of potential lives.

What existential risks does the book highlight?

Key risks include: - **Catastrophic climate change** - **Unregulated AI development** - **Pandemics and bioweapons** - **Civilizational collapse** without recovery mechanisms - **Moral backsliding** halting societal progress

How does MacAskill justify prioritizing future generations?

Using **population ethics**, he asserts that future lives are equally valuable to current ones. Historical examples—like ending slavery—illustrate how moral shifts can have long-lasting positive ripple effects, justifying proactive investments in humanity’s future.

What is "moral entrepreneurship" in the book?

Moral entrepreneurship refers to **pioneering ethical innovations** that reshape societal values. MacAskill cites movements like abolitionism and environmentalism as examples, urging readers to champion new norms that benefit future societies.

How does the book address digital minds?

MacAskill warns that **AI-driven digital consciousness** could dominate the future, potentially outpacing human intelligence. He stresses the need to align these minds with humane values to prevent dystopian outcomes.

Что мы должны будущему

Уильям Макаскилл

3.82(6234 Reviews)

Обзор книги Что мы должны будущему

В книге «Что мы должны будущему» (What We Owe the Future) Макаскилл призывает нас взглянуть на всю временную шкалу человечества. Эта радикальная концепция, одобренная Илоном Маском и ставшая бестселлером New York Times, задает вопрос: что, если ваши сегодняшние решения могут повлиять на миллиарды жизней через тысячи лет?

Выберите способ повествования

Одна книга. Множество способов её услышать.

Те же идеи из Что мы должны будущему. Выберите подходящие вам голос, глубину и темп. Меняйте в любое время.

Глава 1

Shaping Humanity's Vast Future: Our Greatest Moral Responsibility

When Elon Musk was asked which book had most influenced his thinking in recent years, he didn't hesitate: "What We Owe The Future" by William MacAskill. This philosophical tour de force has captured the imagination of influential thinkers across industries, from tech titans to political leaders. MacAskill's concept of "longtermism" - the idea that positively influencing the long-term future is a key moral priority - has sparked a movement that's reshaping how we think about our responsibilities to future generations. Named one of the best books of 2022 by publications ranging from The Economist to The New York Times, it arrives at a critical moment when humanity faces unprecedented technological risks and opportunities that could determine our species' fate for millions of years to come.

Глава 2

The Moral Revolution of Taking the Future Seriously

Imagine living every human life in sequence - all 100 billion lives spanning 300,000 years of human history. You'd spend 10% of your time as a hunter-gatherer, 60% as an agriculturalist, and just a fraction in our modern technological era. But here's the staggering truth: if humanity survives even a million years (the typical mammalian species lifespan), 99.5% of all human lives still lie ahead. On the scale of a human life, we're just five months old. This perspective reveals the moral importance of safeguarding humanity's future. The case for longtermism rests on three simple principles: future people count morally just as much as present people; there could be an astronomical number of them; and our actions today might determine whether their lives are wonderful or terrible. Future people are utterly disenfranchised - they cannot vote, lobby, or make their views heard. Yet taking them seriously represents a moral revolution comparable to previous movements that expanded moral consideration to disempowered groups. Though we cannot give future people political power, we can act as trustees for generations to come. The potential scale of the future is staggering. If humans survive just as long as the typical mammalian species, there would be eighty trillion people yet to come, outnumbering us ten thousand to one. And this is conservative - with our unique adaptability, humanity might survive hundreds of millions of years until Earth becomes uninhabitable, or even trillions of years as the universe slowly cools. The future could be extraordinarily good. In just the last two centuries, global life expectancy has risen from under thirty to seventy-three years. Extreme poverty has fallen from over 80% to under 10%. We could build a world where everyone lives like the happiest people in the most well-off countries today, free from poverty and inadequate healthcare. Yet dystopia is equally possible - totalitarianism, environmental collapse, or civilization-destroying war. Whether the future is wonderful or terrible depends partly on us.

Следите за каждым словом во время прослушивания

Читайте вместе с аудио: каждое слово из Что мы должны будущему подсвечивается в реальном времени.

Глава 3

How Our Actions Today Shape Millennia to Come

We affect the long-term future constantly through everyday actions. Greenhouse gas emissions will impact Earth for hundreds of thousands of years - timescales comparable to nuclear waste. In the medium-low emissions scenario, sea levels would rise ten to twenty meters over ten thousand years, submerging major coastal cities worldwide. History shows deliberate attempts to influence the distant future can succeed. Shakespeare and Horace created works that have lasted centuries. Thucydides, writing in the fifth century BC, deliberately crafted his history "to last forever" and still influences military academies today. America's Founding Fathers consciously designed institutions for "thousands of years," with Benjamin Franklin even investing money to benefit Boston and Philadelphia centuries later. The seemingly wild implications of longtermism stem not from its moral premises but from the unusual historical moment we inhabit. We live in an era of extraordinary change - with economic growth at historically unprecedented 3% per year compared to near 0% for most of human history. This rapid rate of change cannot continue forever due to physical limitations. Combined with our unusual global connectivity, this gives us outsized opportunity to influence humanity's future trajectory. History often features periods of plasticity followed by rigidity, like glassblowing where molten glass can take many shapes before cooling into a fixed form. These moments of plasticity frequently follow crises or occur when institutions are new. With climate change, we missed early opportunities for action when the science was already clear but the issue less politically divisive. We should learn from this and address emerging challenges like advanced AI proactively.

Глава 4

Moral Progress Is Not Inevitable

Despite slavery's historical ubiquity, it was eventually abolished through the efforts of many, including enslaved people who resisted and a small group of Quaker activists. The suffering of enslaved people was immense - those who survived the Atlantic crossing faced ten-hour workdays on plantations, widespread whipping, and life expectancies as low as twenty years. Slavery was widely accepted as natural, even by renowned philosophers like Plato and Aristotle. Benjamin Lay, a four-foot-tall Quaker activist, used dramatic protests to highlight slavery's horrors - standing barefoot in snow, disrupting meetings, and once splashing fake blood on a Quaker gathering. Though ostracized during his lifetime, Lay influenced Quaker circles that dramatically shifted from 70% of leaders owning slaves (1681-1705) to just 10% (1754-1780). This Quaker movement spread through activists like Anthony Benezet to Britain, where abolitionists eventually persuaded Parliament to abolish the slave trade in 1807 and slavery itself in 1833, marking one of history's most significant moral transformations. Was abolition inevitable? The evidence suggests it was far from guaranteed. In China, slavery waxed and waned over millennia - from the ancient Shang dynasty (before 1500 BCE) until final abolition in 1909, with multiple attempts at reform followed by resurgence under new dynasties. Globally, it's difficult to see abolitionism as part of any consistent historical trend toward moral progress. Moral inconsistencies can persist for remarkably long periods - consider modern examples like the legality of alcohol versus other drugs, factory farming alongside pet protection laws, or prison labor in the United States. Mississippi's Parchman Farm operated as a de facto plantation using convict labor until the 1970s, and even today American prisoners work for about one dollar per hour. The abolitionists demonstrate not only the importance of moral change but how to achieve it. Benjamin Lay exemplifies the moral entrepreneur - someone who thinks deeply about morality, takes it seriously, acts on convictions, and willingly endures being seen as eccentric. We should aspire to be such "weirdos" who can withstand mockery while driving moral progress.

Получите больше от Что мы должны будущему

Получайте новые идеи каждый день из более чем 100 000 уроков
Слова подсвечиваются синхронно с аудио
Ваша библиотека сохранена на всех устройствах

Глава 5

The Perilous Possibility of Value Lock-In

The collapse of China's Zhou dynasty in the sixth century BC created both conflict and a golden age of philosophical experimentation known as the Hundred Schools of Thought. During this period, philosophers traveled between states promoting competing theories and moral systems to political elites. During China's Warring States era, four major philosophical traditions competed for influence: Confucianism, Legalism, Daoism, and Mohism. These schools engaged in bitter rivalries until 221 BC, when the Legalism-influenced Qin dynasty conquered China and violently suppressed competing ideologies. The first Qin emperor ordered book burnings, prohibited "private learning," and executed hundreds of dissenting scholars. Following popular revolt and years of conflict, the Han dynasty emerged. Initially guided by a blend of philosophies, Confucianism gradually became the orthodox state ideology through skillful political maneuvering. Despite periods when Buddhism and Daoism flourished alongside it, Confucianism dominated Chinese intellectual life for over a thousand years. We are currently living through a global equivalent of China's Hundred Schools of Thought - a period of moral plasticity where different worldviews compete and no single one has won out. Like molten glass that can be shaped into many forms, our philosophical culture remains malleable. But technological advances, particularly artificial intelligence, could bring this period of diversity and change to an end. Artificial intelligence aims to create machines that mimic human intelligence. Recent breakthroughs in machine learning have produced remarkable achievements like AlphaGo beating world champion Lee Sedol, and AI systems that generate speech, images, art, and text. The ultimate goal is artificial general intelligence (AGI) - a system capable of learning and performing as wide an array of tasks as humans can. AGI would be monumentally important for two reasons. First, it could dramatically accelerate technological progress and economic growth. By automating innovation itself and allowing unlimited "reproduction" of AI workers, growth rates could increase from today's 3% annually to levels where economies double in size over months rather than decades. Second, AGI has potential immortality. Just as software like the 1977 game Pong can be preserved indefinitely through replication, AGI could persist as long as civilization exists. This combination of rapid technological progress and immortality makes value lock-in a real possibility. The development of AGI presents a profound challenge similar to a child appointing an adult to rule a country - how do we ensure vastly more intelligent systems act according to our wishes? As Nick Bostrom outlined in "Superintelligence," an AI with goals different from humanity's would seek resources and prevent threats to its existence, potentially leading to human disempowerment or elimination.

Глава 6

Existential Risks: The Threats That Could End Everything

Arthur C. Clarke's novel "Rendezvous with Rama" begins with a devastating asteroid strike in Italy that kills 600,000 people and destroys priceless cultural treasures. This fictional disaster prompts humanity to create Spaceguard, an early-warning system for Earth-bound threats from space. In reality, scientists' warnings about asteroid dangers were often met with a "giggle factor" until comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 crashed into Jupiter in 1994 with force equivalent to 125 times the world's nuclear arsenal. This event increased public awareness, and in 1998, Congress tasked NASA with finding 90% of all near-Earth objects larger than one kilometer, naming the effort "Spaceguard" in homage to Clarke. The program has been remarkably successful, tracking 93% of large asteroids and 98% of extinction-threatening ones. We now know the risk of an extinction-level asteroid impact is less than one in fifteen billion - a hundred times lower than previously estimated. Despite COVID-19's devastating toll of seventeen million deaths and $10 trillion in economic damage, we've gotten off relatively easy. Future pandemics, particularly those engineered through biotechnology, could be far more destructive. Biotechnology has progressed at a staggering pace - even faster than Moore's law - with human genome sequencing costs plummeting from hundreds of millions to just $1,000 in twenty years. Many extinction risk specialists consider engineered pandemics the second most likely cause of human extinction this century, just behind artificial intelligence. Metaculus forecasts a 0.6% chance of an engineered pandemic killing at least 95% of humanity by 2100, while expert Toby Ord estimates 3%. The Cold War's bioweapons race demonstrates how war drives dangerous technological development. While we've enjoyed a "Long Peace" since World War II with no direct great-power conflicts, this peace cannot be taken for granted, as Russia's invasion of Ukraine reminds us. Following this invasion, Metaculus more than doubled its predicted chance of a third world war by 2050 to 23%. Great-power war amplifies virtually all other existential risks - it diverts resources from safety measures, destroys international cooperation, increases the likelihood of bioweapons development, nuclear strikes, AI arms races, and undermines climate change mitigation efforts. Reducing the likelihood of world war is therefore one of the most important ways to safeguard civilization this century.

Следите за каждым словом во время прослушивания

Читайте вместе с аудио: каждое слово из Что мы должны будущему подсвечивается в реальном времени.

Глава 7

Collapse, Stagnation, and Recovery

In AD 100, the Roman Empire stood alongside the Han dynasty as one of two superpowers encompassing half the world's population. Rome represented the pinnacle of advancement with central heating, durable concrete, massive structures like the Colosseum, sophisticated economic systems, and a population of one million in its capital. After centuries of growth and stability, Rome's decline was dramatic - sacked twice in the 5th century and eventually collapsing. Rome's population plummeted to just 30,000, not recovering for 1,400 years. Despite historical collapses like Rome's, human civilization has shown remarkable resilience. Even when the Western Roman Empire fell, Europe wasn't depopulated - Roman rule was simply replaced by various Germanic tribes. While technological sophistication declined dramatically, this decline wasn't permanent. The Renaissance, Scientific Revolution, and Industrial Revolution eventually emerged from these ashes. Even in a worst-case nuclear scenario where 99% of humanity perished, civilization would likely survive. The physical infrastructure, knowledge in libraries and digital storage, and critical skill sets would remain. With 2 billion people working in agriculture today, agricultural knowledge would persist. The impacts would be geographically diverse - coastal areas in the Southern Hemisphere would be less affected, with places like Australia and New Zealand potentially continuing relatively unscathed. Recent years have brought unprecedented hope in addressing climate change. The International Energy Agency predicts that global coal use peaked in 2014 and is now in structural decline. Solar panel costs have fallen by a factor of 250 since 1976, while lithium-ion battery costs have dropped 41-fold since 1991. Though solar and wind currently supply only about 3% of global energy, continued exponential cost declines suggest they'll provide a substantial portion within twenty years. However, we shouldn't get complacent. There's a substantial chance decarbonization efforts will stall due to breakdowns in international coordination or technological stagnation. In a worst-case scenario where we burn through all recoverable fossil fuels, we'd likely see 7 degrees of warming with a one-in-six chance of 9.5 degrees. The Islamic Golden Age of the eleventh century saw Baghdad become the global center of scientific progress, producing remarkable innovations: magnifying lens theory, flywheel-powered water-lifting devices, the first programmable machine, and pioneering code-breaking methods. However, this golden age faded from the twelfth century onward due to various factors including the Mongol invasion, the Crusades, or cultural shifts prioritizing theology over science. What distinguishes our modern era is that technological progress and economic growth have been sustained at unprecedented levels since the Industrial Revolution. But the question remains: will this continue, or will future historians view our era as just another efflorescence that eventually stagnated?

Глава 8

The Philosophical Case for Valuing Future Lives

Derek Parfit, one of the most influential moral philosophers of the last century, dedicated his life to advancing our moral understanding with extraordinary single-mindedness. Living mostly at Oxford's exclusive All Souls College, he minimized time spent on anything but philosophy - running between seminars, eating the same simple meals daily, and even reading while brushing his teeth. Parfit argued that extinction would be catastrophically worse than even a disaster killing 99% of humanity, because extinction would prevent the existence of countless future generations. He maintained that preventing a happy life from existing constitutes a moral loss - a view I initially found counterintuitive but came to accept through philosophical argument. The view that creating happy people is morally neutral rather than good is often considered intuitive. Jan Narveson expressed this as "We are in favour of making people happy, but neutral about making happy people." However, this intuition becomes problematic in extreme cases. If creating miserable lives is clearly bad - imagine bringing into existence someone who would experience nothing but agony - why wouldn't creating happy lives be good? This asymmetry is difficult to justify philosophically. Parfit noted that our existence is extraordinarily contingent and identity is exceptionally fragile, with profound ethical implications. Our identities depend on astronomical odds - any of the 200 million other sperm in our father's ejaculation would have created someone else with 75% of our genes. Even millisecond differences in conception timing would have resulted in completely different people. This fragility means our everyday choices constantly alter future identities. By taking public transport instead of driving, you slightly impact thousands of people's schedules, statistically changing at least one conception timing annually. This creates an "identity cascade" where, beyond a certain point, everyone born will differ from who would have existed otherwise, completely changing future history. A simple logical argument demonstrates why the intuition of neutrality fails. Consider parents deciding whether to have a child. Due to a temporary maternal vitamin deficiency, conceiving now would result in a child who suffers from migraines throughout life but otherwise lives well. Alternatively, they could wait a few months and have a migraine-free child, or have no child at all. According to the intuition of neutrality, having no child is equally good as having a child with migraines (option A = B). Similarly, having no child is equally good as having a migraine-free child (option A = C). But by simple logic, if A = B and A = C, then B must equal C. This creates a contradiction, because having a migraine-free child is clearly better than having a child who suffers from migraines when all else is equal.

Получите больше от Что мы должны будущему

Получайте новые идеи каждый день из более чем 100 000 уроков
Слова подсвечиваются синхронно с аудио
Ваша библиотека сохранена на всех устройствах

Глава 9

Will the Future Be Good or Bad?

Imagine living every human life ever lived - would you consider this collective existence worthwhile? Now extend this thought experiment to all sentient beings: you would experience 100 billion trillion years of vertebrate consciousness, with 80% as fish, 20% as amphibians or reptiles, and human existence comprising just one-hundred billionth of your time. Let's begin by asking whether the world is better than nothing for humans alive today. Do most people have net-positive lives? This sensitive question matters not just for longtermists but also for practical policy decisions like healthcare prioritization. Life satisfaction surveys of 1.5 million people across 166 countries found only 47% scored above 5 on a 0-10 scale, though interpreting where "neutral" falls is difficult. Happiness surveys show most people report being happy, with over 70% in almost all countries saying they're "very" or "rather" happy, though these may be optimistic. To gather more data, I commissioned psychologists to survey Americans and Indians about their life quality. The results were striking: In the US, 16% said their life contained more suffering than happiness, 9% preferred never to have been born, and 31% wouldn't live their exact same life again. Indian respondents were notably more positive, with only 11% reporting more suffering than happiness and just 6% wishing they had never been born. Putting it all together, I'd tentatively suggest that about 10% of the global population have lives with below-neutral wellbeing. If I were given the option to be reincarnated as a randomly selected person alive today, I would choose to do so. If I were to live through everyone's lives, I would be glad to have lived. When assessing whether the world is good on balance, we must consider the vast majority of sentient beings: nonhuman animals. The scale of animal suffering in factory farming is staggering - approximately 79 billion vertebrate land animals and 100 billion fish are slaughtered for food annually. The conditions these animals endure are horrific. Broiler chickens grow so rapidly that 30% develop severe walking problems. Their slaughter involves being hung upside down, electrocuted, and having their throats cut - with millions surviving only to die in scalding water. Egg-laying hens fare even worse, confined to battery cages smaller than a sheet of paper after having their beaks painfully cut. When considering the long-term future, we must weigh the likelihood of reaching eutopia versus anti-eutopia. Despite the greater badness of anti-eutopia, there are strong reasons to believe eutopia is much more likely. People rarely produce bad things simply because they are bad. Even the worst atrocities typically occur not because people actively seek suffering, but as side effects or means to other ends. Factory farming persists not because people enjoy animal suffering, but because they want cheap meat. Similarly, slavery and war were pursued for profit, power, and glory.

Глава 10

Taking Action for the Long-Term Future

In the Aymara language of Bolivia and surrounding regions, the future is conceptualized as being behind us (unseen) while the past is before us (visible). This metaphor aptly describes our relationship with the future - we're walking backwards into unknown terrain, able only to glimpse what's coming by looking over our shoulder. Despite uncertainty about the future, we can still make wise choices. Like explorers in uncharted territory, we should: (1) take actions we can be confident are good across multiple scenarios, (2) increase our options rather than limiting them, and (3) learn more about what might lie ahead. This means promoting robustly beneficial technologies like clean energy, maintaining diverse cultures and political systems, and investing in better long-term forecasting and research. When tackling global problems, we must prioritize like an expedition facing multiple threats - some issues demand immediate attention while others can wait. Rather than choosing causes close to our hearts or those most visible, we should evaluate problems using significance, persistence, contingency, tractability, and neglectedness. Some issues allow for robustly good actions: climate change (supporting organizations like Clean Air Task Force), biosecurity (promoting universal diagnostics), and general disaster preparedness (building food stockpiles, bunkers, and information vaults). For complex problems like AI safety, the key is building fields of morally motivated actors who can reduce uncertainty. While many focus on personal consumption choices to address global problems, this emphasis is often a strategic blunder. Consider plastic reduction - reusing a plastic bag 8,000 times equals the environmental impact of avoiding just one transatlantic flight. Even meaningful personal choices like vegetarianism pale compared to systemic approaches: donating 10% of a median American income to effective climate organizations could reduce emissions by 3,000 tonnes yearly - far exceeding a lifetime of vegetarianism. Career choice is the most impactful decision for your lifetime impact. When choosing a career, follow three key principles: learn, build options, and do good. First, treat your career like an experiment - research options, make your best guess, try it for a couple years, update, and repeat. Second, build career capital by investing in skills like organizational leadership, political influence, research abilities, communication, entrepreneurship, and community building. Finally, focus on doing good by choosing high-impact problem areas. Beyond direct impact, spreading longtermism itself can be enormously powerful. Convincing just one person to do as much good as you would have done doubles your impact. Recent environmental successes, like Germany's solar initiatives that drove down global costs by 92% between 2000-2020, show how future-oriented activism can have transformative effects. The challenges ahead - decarbonizing the economy, reducing risks from war, engineered pathogens, and AI - require a movement of morally motivated people concerned about the future. Positive moral change isn't inevitable; it requires work by generations of thinkers and activists. We live at a pivotal time of extraordinary change when we can steer the future onto a better trajectory.

★★★★★

Вы дочитали Что мы должны будущему до конца

Любимо более чем 1 млн учащихся

“Прошло 23 дня, и я пользуюсь приложением каждый день. Теперь оно стало частью моей повседневной жизни.”

jayallen

Ключевые темы в Что мы должны будущему

longtermism
moral responsibility
existential risk
future generations
value lock-in

Цитаты из Что мы должны будущему

Civilization could plausibly last for millions, billions, or even trillions of years.
Future people count morally.
If we accept that future people matter, then we should accept that we should prioritize actions that improve the very long-run future.
The future could be radically better than the present.
We can affect the very long-run future.

Персонажи в Что мы должны будущему

William MacAskillAuthor and philosopher who developed longtermism
Benjamin LayQuaker activist who protested against slavery
Anthony BenezetAbolitionist activist who spread Quaker ideals
ThucydidesAncient historian who wrote to influence forever

Об авторе

Уильям Макаскилл, автор книги «Что мы должны будущему» (What We Owe the Future), — философ-новатор и сооснователь движения эффективного альтруизма. Будучи адъюнкт-профессором Оксфордского университета, он стал самым молодым профессором философии в этом учебном заведении на момент своего назначения.

Его работа сосредоточена на лонгтермизме — этическом императиве по защите долгосрочного потенциала человечества — и принятии моральных решений в условиях неопределенности. Экспертный опыт Макаскилла основан на создании таких некоммерческих организаций, как Giving What We Can и 80,000 Hours, которые мобилизовали более 300 миллионов долларов на высокоэффективные цели.

Его предыдущие книги, «Умнее, чем кажется» (Doing Good Better) и «Моральная неопределенность» (Moral Uncertainty), утвердили его как ведущего эксперта в области доказательной филантропии и этической теории. Макаскилл является частым автором The New York Times и The Guardian, а его выступление на TED об эффективном альтруизме посмотрели миллионы людей по всему миру.

Отмеченный в списке Forbes «30 до 30» в категории социального предпринимательства, он сочетает академическую строгость с практическими стратегиями для достижения глобального блага. Книга «Что мы должны будущему» стала бестселлером по версии New York Times, усилив его призыв уделять приоритетное внимание будущим поколениям при принятии важнейших решений сегодня.

Скачать резюме книги «Что мы должны будущему»

Получите резюме книги «Что мы должны будущему» в формате PDF или EPUB бесплатно. Распечатайте или читайте офлайн в любое время.

Пользователям также понравилось

Future Stories

David Christian

The Inevitable

Kevin Kelly

The Future of Humanity

Michio Kaku

Doing Good Better

William MacAskill

Long-Term Thinking for a Short-Term World

Jim Brumm

This Could Be Our Future

Yancey Strickler

THE FUTURE WE CHOOSE

Christiana Figueres

The Precipice

Toby Ord

Часто задаваемые вопросы об этой книге

Узнать больше

ПЛАН ОБУЧЕНИЯ

The Culture: AI Minds and Human Purpose

This plan explores the intersection of advanced technology and social philosophy through the lens of Iain M. Banks's universe. It is ideal for sci-fi enthusiasts, futurists, and ethicists interested in the long-term implications of AI governance.

2 h•4 Разделы

ПЛАН ОБУЧЕНИЯ

The Existentialist Roadmap to Freedom

This plan is essential for individuals feeling trapped by societal expectations or existential dread, offering a path to radical self-ownership. It is designed for deep thinkers and aspiring leaders who want to build a life of authenticity and purpose beyond conventional norms.

2 h•4 Разделы

ПЛАН ОБУЧЕНИЯ

The Grand Architecture of Human Civilization

This plan bridges classical philosophy with modern economic and leadership challenges to provide a holistic view of societal development. It is ideal for aspiring leaders and history enthusiasts who want to understand the intellectual foundations of today's global systems.

1 h 30 m•3 Разделы

ПЛАН ОБУЧЕНИЯ

The Full Stack Human

In an era dominated by rapid technological shifts and AI, understanding the biological and cognitive foundations of being human is essential. This plan is ideal for lifelong learners and professionals seeking to connect science, philosophy, and interdisciplinary strategy to lead a more purposeful life.

2 h•4 Разделы

ПЛАН ОБУЧЕНИЯ

Read high-concept sci-fi exploring extremes

High-concept science fiction pushes the boundaries of imagination, challenging readers to confront radical ideas about humanity's future and the nature of reality itself. This learning plan is ideal for readers seeking to move beyond conventional sci-fi narratives into more intellectually demanding works that explore consciousness, technological transcendence, and the outer limits of speculative thought.

5 h 22 m•4 Разделы

ПЛАН ОБУЧЕНИЯ

La responsabilité à l'ère des machines

Ce parcours est essentiel pour comprendre comment concilier innovation technologique et impératifs éthiques durables. Il s'adresse aux décideurs et citoyens souhaitant naviguer les défis de l'automatisation tout en préservant l'avenir.

1 h 30 m•3 Разделы

ПЛАН ОБУЧЕНИЯ

Existentialism

This plan provides a roadmap for navigating the complexities of modern existence by engaging with the world's most influential thinkers. It is ideal for anyone seeking to build a resilient personal philosophy and find clarity in their own freedom and ethical choices.

5 h 55 m•4 Разделы

ПЛАН ОБУЧЕНИЯ

The Integrated Human Map

This multidisciplinary framework is essential for thinkers who want to bridge the gap between biological evolution, historical narrative, and physical laws. It is designed for visionaries and problem-solvers looking to build a holistic understanding of how to reboot global systems.

3 h•4 Разделы

Создано выпускниками Колумбийского университета в Сан-Франциско

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

Узнайте больше о том, как обсуждают BeFreed в интернете

Создано выпускниками Колумбийского университета в Сан-Франциско

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

Узнайте больше о том, как обсуждают BeFreed в интернете

Начните своё обучение прямо сейчас

Глава 10

Что мы должны будущему

ОбзорОбзор книги Что мы должны будущему

Одна книга. Множество способов её услышать.

Shaping Humanity's Vast Future: Our Greatest Moral Responsibility

The Moral Revolution of Taking the Future Seriously

Следите за каждым словом во время прослушивания

How Our Actions Today Shape Millennia to Come

Moral Progress Is Not Inevitable

Получите больше от Что мы должны будущему

The Perilous Possibility of Value Lock-In

Existential Risks: The Threats That Could End Everything

Следите за каждым словом во время прослушивания

Collapse, Stagnation, and Recovery

The Philosophical Case for Valuing Future Lives

Получите больше от Что мы должны будущему

Will the Future Be Good or Bad?

Taking Action for the Long-Term Future

Вы дочитали Что мы должны будущему до конца

Ключевые темы в Что мы должны будущему

Цитаты из Что мы должны будущему

Персонажи в Что мы должны будущему

Об авторе

Скачать резюме книги «Что мы должны будущему»

Пользователям также понравилось

Часто задаваемые вопросы об этой книге

What is What We Owe The Future about?

Who should read What We Owe The Future?

Is What We Owe The Future worth reading?

What is longtermism according to William MacAskill?

Узнать больше

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

Одна книга. Множество способов её услышать.

Shaping Humanity's Vast Future: Our Greatest Moral Responsibility

The Moral Revolution of Taking the Future Seriously

Следите за каждым словом во время прослушивания

How Our Actions Today Shape Millennia to Come

Moral Progress Is Not Inevitable

Получите больше от Что мы должны будущему

The Perilous Possibility of Value Lock-In

Existential Risks: The Threats That Could End Everything

Следите за каждым словом во время прослушивания

Collapse, Stagnation, and Recovery

The Philosophical Case for Valuing Future Lives

Получите больше от Что мы должны будущему

Will the Future Be Good or Bad?

Taking Action for the Long-Term Future

Вы дочитали Что мы должны будущему до конца

Пользователям также понравилось

Узнать больше

Обзор книги Что мы должны будущему