
In "Static," Amy and David Goodman expose how government and media manipulate truth. This fearless 2006 expose predicted today's "fake news" era, earning Amy the alternative Nobel Prize. What silenced voices are fighting back while you're being distracted?
Amy Goodman, award-winning journalist and host of Democracy Now!, is the co-author of Static: Government Liars, Media Cheerleaders, and the People Who Fight Back, a sharp critique of corporate media and political power structures.
A Harvard-educated anthropologist turned investigative reporter, Goodman’s career spans decades exposing government corruption, corporate malfeasance, and grassroots movements ignored by mainstream outlets. Her groundbreaking work as the executive producer and host of Democracy Now!—syndicated across 1,400 global stations—cements her authority in independent journalism.
Goodman’s other New York Times bestsellers, including The Exception to the Rulers and Democracy Now!: Twenty Years Covering the Movements Changing America, further dissect systemic inequities and activist resilience. Recognized with the Right Livelihood Award and Harvard’s I.F. Stone Medal for Journalistic Independence, Goodman’s writing merges frontline reporting with incisive analysis, amplifying marginalized voices.
Static reflects her decades-long mission to challenge power and redefine news accountability, solidifying her status as a pivotal figure in progressive media.
Static examines the collusion between government, corporate interests, and mainstream media to manipulate public perception, particularly during the Bush administration. Amy and David Goodman expose lies about war, torture, and media censorship while amplifying marginalized voices of activists and dissidents. The book combines investigative reporting with firsthand accounts to challenge power structures and advocate for grassroots democracy.
This book is ideal for readers seeking critical analysis of U.S. politics, media bias, and corporate influence. Activists, journalists, and students of political science will benefit from its unflinching critique of power and its celebration of dissent. Those interested in post-9/11 wars, government transparency, or independent journalism will find it particularly relevant.
Yes, Static remains a vital resource for understanding media complicity in state propaganda and wartime disinformation. Its blend of rigorous reporting and grassroots perspectives offers a counter-narrative to mainstream coverage. The book’s themes of accountability and resistance resonate in today’s climate of misinformation and corporate consolidation of media.
The Goodmans argue that corporate media outlets often parrot government talking points instead of holding power accountable. They document cases where journalists prioritized access over truth, such as uncritical reporting on the Iraq War’s false premises. The book contrasts this with independent media’s role in amplifying dissent.
Like The Exception to the Rulers and Breaking the Sound Barrier, Static continues Goodman’s focus on systemic corruption and media reform. It expands on her critiques of the Iraq War and torture programs while reinforcing her advocacy for independent journalism as a democratic safeguard.
Yes. Issues like corporate media consolidation, government surveillance, and wartime propaganda persist. The book’s warnings about eroding press freedoms and its blueprint for grassroots resistance remain urgent amid ongoing debates over disinformation and AI-generated content.
The book揭露 fabricated claims about weapons of mass destruction and details how media outlets amplified falsehoods to justify invasion. It highlights soldiers and families who publicly opposed the war, exposing human costs often ignored by mainstream coverage.
Amy Goodman is an award-winning journalist and host of Democracy Now!, renowned for her unembedded war reporting and coverage of human rights abuses. A Harvard graduate, she received the Right Livelihood Award for pioneering grassroots journalism, lending authority to her critiques of media and power.
Some conservatives dismiss the book as overly partisan, while others argue it oversimplifies media dynamics. However, its factual rigor—citing declassified documents and whistleblower testimony—has solidified its reputation as a seminal work on government-media collusion.
Почувствуйте книгу через голос автора
Превратите знания в увлекательные, богатые примерами идеи
Захватите ключевые идеи мгновенно для быстрого обучения
Наслаждайтесь книгой в весёлой и увлекательной форме
When a court will not act because of 'national security,' there is no longer any difference between the West and the Third World.
Разбейте ключевые идеи Static на понятные тезисы, чтобы понять, как инновационные команды создают, сотрудничают и растут.
Погрузитесь в Static через яркие истории, превращающие уроки инноваций в запоминающиеся и применимые моменты.
Задавайте любые вопросы, выбирайте свой стиль обучения и создавайте идеи, которые действительно вам подходят.

Создано выпускниками Колумбийского университета в Сан-Франциско
"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."
"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."
"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."
"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."
"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."
"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."
"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."
"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."
"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"
"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."
"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."
"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"
Создано выпускниками Колумбийского университета в Сан-Франциско

Получите резюме книги «Static» в формате PDF или EPUB бесплатно. Распечатайте или читайте офлайн в любое время.
What happens when the most powerful nation on Earth decides that reality is negotiable? When Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld casually dismisses legal boundaries on propaganda with a shrug: "When you speak today, there's no one audience"? This isn't a dystopian novel-it's the machinery of modern information warfare, operating in plain sight yet invisible to millions. While we obsess over fake news on social media, a far more sophisticated deception has been running for decades: governments and corporations manufacturing consent, one carefully planted story at a time. The question isn't whether we're being manipulated. It's whether we'll keep pretending we're not.
Picture military briefings with PowerPoint slides reading "Villainize Zarqawi/leverage xenophobia response"-official Pentagon documentation of psychological warfare. During the Iraq War, U.S. officials planted fabricated stories in Iraqi newspapers like "IRAQI ARMY DEFEATS TERRORISM" while privately acknowledging no Iraqi battalions could fight independently. They deliberately inflated Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's importance to falsely link Saddam Hussein with 9/11, making the insurgency appear foreign-led when it was predominantly Iraqi. When a supposed Zarqawi letter appeared in the New York Times, General Mark Kimmitt boasted it was "the most successful information campaign to date." But it wasn't journalism-psychological operations officers had fed propaganda to America's paper of record. The government tracked journalists' phone calls to hunt whistleblowers, with Attorney General Alberto Gonzales threatening prosecution for publishing classified information. The message: participate in our narrative or become our target. This propaganda succeeded because corporate media, already compromised by its own complicity, had abandoned its watchdog role entirely.
Why do certain perspectives dominate our news while others vanish? Corporate media suffers from what insiders call "the access of evil" - journalists trading truth for proximity to power. During Bush's first term, 69 percent of Sunday show journalists were conservatives, and 58 percent of guests were Republicans. Before invading Iraq, less than 1 percent of network "experts" represented antiwar organizations. This isn't mainstream media - it's extreme media cheerleading for war while marginalizing dissent. The New York Times' NSA wiretapping story reveals this corruption's depth. In December 2005, they published James Risen and Eric Lichtblau's explosive report on illegal government surveillance. Buried in paragraph nine: the Times had sat on this story for a full year at the White House's request - withholding vital information until after Bush's 2004 reelection. Editor Bill Keller claimed administration officials had "assured" them that "legal checks" existed. This from the regime that had declared torture, preemptive war, and offshore gulags legal. The story only ran because Risen planned to reveal it in his upcoming book.
Maher Arar, a 33-year-old Canadian engineer, was detained at JFK Airport while changing planes. Interrogated for hours without counsel, he warned U.S. officials that Syria would torture him. They ignored him, chaining him to a CIA "torture taxi" and flying him to Jordan for beatings before delivering him to Syrian authorities. There he endured brutal cable torture and imprisonment in an "underground grave"-a rat-infested cell three feet wide, six feet deep, seven feet high, lacking sanitation. He survived this for over ten months. After Canadian intervention, Arar was released without charges in October 2003. Years later, he still suffers nightmares and the "terrorist" label that destroyed his career. When he sued U.S. officials including John Ashcroft, Judge David Trager dismissed the case, ruling that torture decisions belong to Executive and Legislative branches when national security is involved. This wasn't isolated-"extraordinary rendition" systematically kidnapped hundreds globally and sent them to torture-friendly countries. When courts refuse to act citing "national security," what difference remains between the West and the Third World?
In 2004, FBI agents and Denver police in SWAT gear appeared at Sarah Bardwell's door, claiming to investigate "suspected terrorists" regarding upcoming political conventions. When Bardwell and her roommates declined to answer questions, agents took notes on items in their home and threatened "more intrusive effort" for their "noncooperation." Two years later, she admitted: "We don't talk about politics anymore. There's been a toning down of everything we do." The chilling effect was complete. The Thomas Merton Center in Pittsburgh became an FBI "international terrorism investigation" target simply for opposing the Iraq War. Pentagon spies infiltrated a Quaker Meeting House in Florida where activists planned to protest military recruiters. The most far-reaching program was NSA warrantless eavesdropping-a "vacuum cleaner approach" sweeping up innocent Americans' communications. AT&T whistleblower Mark Klein revealed secret eavesdropping rooms in main switching centers. Despite claims the program "saved thousands of lives," virtually all NSA tips led to dead ends, with FBI agents joking that new tips meant more "calls to Pizza Hut."
By 2006, with 70% of Americans disapproving of Bush, the administration had spent $1.6 billion on advertising and PR between 2003-2005. They paid the Lincoln Group to plant propaganda in Iraqi newspapers while creating fake television news segments for American audiences. Government agencies produced hundreds of segments featuring pseudo-reporters delivering propaganda about Medicare and Iraq. The Government Accountability Office labeled these "covert propaganda" and declared them illegal, but the White House instructed agencies to ignore these findings. The administration also paid pundits directly-Armstrong Williams received $240,000 to promote No Child Left Behind. When real journalists became troublesome, they employed fake ones. Jeff Gannon, actually James Guckert, a male escort and gay porn webmaster, obtained White House press credentials and lobbed softball questions at Bush. Meanwhile, legitimate journalists like Maureen Dowd were initially denied credentials, while Helen Thomas, who had covered presidents since Kennedy, was moved to the back row. These efforts succeeded: a December 2005 poll showed 41% of Americans believed Saddam Hussein had "strong links to al Qaeda," 22% thought he helped plan 9/11, and among U.S. troops, 90% believed their mission was "to retaliate for Saddam's role in the 9/11 attacks."
When surveillance chills speech and propaganda replaces journalism, what can one person do? Alice Walker, arrested protesting the Iraq War, offers wisdom: "When you gather with all the other people who are just as small as you are, but you're together" - that's where power begins. South African journalist Allister Sparks identifies the problem: journalists become embedded with sources, dependent on access, reluctant to challenge power. The solution isn't waiting for corporate media to reform - it's building alternatives now. Arundhati Roy urged Americans to confront empire: "If you join the battle, not in your hundreds of thousands, but in your millions, you will be greeted joyously by the rest of the world." That chance remains. The static may be loud, but truth is louder. We see this in investigative reporting exposing corruption, viral videos capturing injustice, grassroots movements shifting discourse. Media isn't something that happens to us - it's something we create. By supporting independent journalism, questioning official narratives, and amplifying marginalized voices, we break through manufactured consent. Democracy's future depends on ordinary people seeking and sharing truth - one story, one voice, one act of courage at a time.