Глава 1
The Urban Renaissance Paradox: Cities as Battlegrounds for Justice
When Marc Doussard and Greg Schrock began researching urban economic justice movements, they discovered something remarkable: cities once deemed powerless against global capital were becoming epicenters of progressive policy innovation. Despite warnings that businesses would flee at the first sign of regulation, more than fifty U.S. cities had enacted minimum wage laws by the late 2010s, many at $15 per hour-double what activists had initially proposed just a decade earlier. This transformation wasn't happening through traditional politics but through a new kind of activism that explicitly linked economic and racial justice. Their book "Justice at Work" arrives at a pivotal moment, as the 2020 convergence of COVID-19, police violence protests, and massive job losses revealed these inequalities as deeply interconnected rather than separate problems. The work has become required reading for organizers and policymakers alike, with figures from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to labor leader Sara Nelson citing its insights on how cities can become laboratories for economic democracy despite seemingly insurmountable constraints.
Глава 2
Cities' Surprising Power in the Global Economy
America's cities present a striking paradox. While inequality has worsened dramatically, urban areas have become unexpected winners in the global economy. This challenges traditional theories suggesting cities lack power to address inequality for fear of scaring away investment. The reality is more complex and offers surprising leverage for justice movements.
Three key economic shifts have transformed urban dynamics: the emergence of "post-Fordism" replacing mass production with specialized industries; deindustrialization shifting employment from manufacturing to polarized service sectors; and financialization intensifying inequality through both employment and housing markets. These changes have reversed decades of disinvestment, making central cities essential coordination hubs for global production networks.
Today's businesses depend on dense urban centers to provide specialized labor and innovation ecosystems. This reversal creates problems of growth rather than decline-gentrification rather than abandonment-opening new opportunities for progressive movements. As businesses become anchored to specific urban locations, they can't credibly threaten to relocate when faced with regulations improving wages or working conditions.
This economic transformation enables a fundamental shift in how we approach development. Rather than focusing solely on manufacturing exports and hoping benefits trickle down, cities can directly regulate service industries that cannot easily relocate. Policies mandating higher pay and better working conditions in these sectors can create the same economic multipliers that once characterized manufacturing while directly addressing inequality.
The evidence contradicts traditional assumptions about the incompatibility of growth and equity. Chicago's $15 minimum wage passed with minimal controversy and strong public support. Even business-friendly mayors like Rahm Emanuel have embraced wage laws under activist pressure. Cities remain committed to growth but have found ways to reconcile economic development with distributive fairness, challenging long-held assumptions about what's politically possible.
Глава 3
The Evolution of Economic and Racial Justice Coalitions
Urban social movements have undergone a remarkable transformation over the past four decades, evolving from neighborhood-based organizing to sophisticated multi-issue coalitions that explicitly connect economic and racial justice. This evolution has unfolded through four distinct periods aligned with economic changes.
During deindustrialization in the 1980s, neighborhood coalitions attempted electoral takeovers by uniting minority neighborhoods with white progressives. Notable victories included electing Harold Washington in Chicago and Ray Flynn in Boston, who used public power to direct resources to neglected neighborhoods. However, these efforts yielded disappointing results as mayors struggled to govern while alienating private interests, and the movement's discursive strategy of pitting neighborhoods against downtown placed reform mayors in conflict with the economic centers needed to overcome deindustrialization.
The 1990s saw the emergence of citywide living-wage movements that joined neighborhood coalitions with labor unions to address service-sector poverty. This approach expanded advocacy for social and economic equality by building multi-organizational networks that eventually gained power to set political agendas beyond city government's limited powers. The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) provided crucial organizational structure, supplying a network to spread policy proposals and convening coalitions that converted neighborhood concerns into city-level advocacy.
In the 2000s, these movements pursued community benefits agreements with developers, responding to inequitable reinvestment in previously disinvested neighborhoods. Organizations like the Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy helped secure agreements attaching conditions to major development projects, including union labor requirements, above-market wages, affordable housing contributions, and job training support.
After the Great Recession, activism transformed again, embracing previously downplayed elements: explicit racial and economic justice messaging, public confrontation, multi-organization networks, and ideological critiques of capitalism and institutional racism. Organizations increasingly prioritized racial justice in their mission statements and resource allocation, with the SEIU declaring "We cannot achieve economic justice without racial justice."
Chicago's Grassroots Collaborative exemplifies this shift. Beginning with a traditional economic focus, the organization's trajectory changed after the failed 2006 "Big Box" living-wage campaign. Executive director Amisha Patel recognized that while "the faces of the people on the protests were black and Latino," the campaign didn't address race directly, allowing Mayor Daley to control the racial narrative. The Great Recession cemented their pivot toward addressing racial inequities through public finance campaigns, challenging austerity measures that disproportionately affected communities of color.
Unlike earlier movements that emphasized class over race, today's Economic and Racial Justice (ERJ) coalitions treat economic and racial inequalities as manifestations of the same problem. Their success stems from three key innovations: finding leverage by targeting place-dependent service economies rather than mobile manufacturing; explicitly incorporating racial justice rather than subsuming it; and adopting expansive framing that connects workers' rights to broader social justice.
Глава 4
Urban Policy Entrepreneurs: How Movements Win
How do grassroots movements capitalize on political opportunities? Rather than seeing successful campaigns as products of luck specific to individual cities, Doussard and Schrock examine how activists strategically replicate victories across multiple locations through what they call "urban policy entrepreneurship."
Urban policy entrepreneurs (UPEs) work through coalitions to identify favorable political venues and systematically experiment with legislation and advocacy techniques. Building on John Kingdon's concept of policy entrepreneurs, they operate within three semi-autonomous streams-problems, policies, and politics-that must align for major policy changes to occur.
In the problem stream, UPEs have greater ability to shape public perception than national policy entrepreneurs. Cities provide advantages for making "focusing events"-like Occupy Wall Street using the local tactic of occupying Zuccotti Park to draw national attention to inequality. Urban spaces offer "trenches" for collective action, with visible inequalities creating fertile ground for activism. Local media, which have strong connections with community organizations and need content, provide coverage opportunities.
In the policy stream, UPEs operate through complex networks spanning multiple cities and issues. These networks provide access to diverse policy models, research and testimony from numerous municipal experiments. The multitude of subnational legislative forums allows UPEs to "shop" for opportunities across cities, counties and states, running several campaigns simultaneously. Urban legislation often faces less conservative opposition and requires convincing fewer officials (just a dozen city council members in many cities), allowing ambitious bills to survive negotiation intact.
In the politics stream, cities offer UPEs two distinct advantages. First, the urban real estate boom creates numerous intervention points through public approvals for funding, zoning, and site assembly. These visible targets allow activists to force concessions from developers and public authorities. Second, municipal elections provide opportunities to escalate pressure, with justice coalitions manufacturing political pressure by targeting campaigns or supporting challengers.
Unlike Washington policy entrepreneurs who must "wait for the fortuitous event," UPEs can "make their own luck" by actively opening agenda windows. They use problem and politics streams strategically-staging protests, introducing legislation, and shaping political narratives through organizing. Campaigns are most effective when articulating simple problems like inequality or racism rather than complex issues like housing justice.
Глава 5
The Fight for $15: A Movement Transformation
The Fight for $15 movement transformed minimum wage politics in America. At the turn of the century, the federal minimum wage remained stagnant at $5.15, few states had their own minimum wages, and city-level minimum wages didn't exist. Today, most states have minimum wages, many exceeding $10, and numerous cities have enacted $15 minimum wages.
This dramatic shift resulted from a movement that evolved from experimental strikes in 2012 to a nationwide campaign spanning hundreds of cities. Starting with Black Friday ministrikes in Manhattan, Chicago, and Detroit, organizers tested whether workers could protest without losing jobs. The campaign expanded strategically, choosing cities with symbolic significance-St. Louis and Detroit highlighted issues facing Black workers in areas with anti-union legislation. By September 2013, coordinated national strikes occurred in over 150 cities, eventually incorporating airport workers, home health workers, security guards, and adjunct faculty.
The movement deliberately built a national network of organizations, including the National Employment Law Project, Economic Policy Institute, SEIU, and the UC Berkeley Labor Center, creating infrastructure to support local campaigns led by economic and racial justice coalitions. This network provided draft legislation, legal advice, and testimony, allowing campaigns to learn systematically from both failures and successes.
SeaTac, Washington became the first U.S. city to approve a $15 minimum wage through Proposition 1 in November 2013. Despite SeaTac's small size (26,900 residents), the campaign faced challenges from economic divisions within the city, requiring intensive door-knocking across diverse immigrant communities. The proposition passed by just 77 votes, proving $15 was viable but through methods too resource-intensive to easily replicate elsewhere.
Seattle's $15 campaign culminated in a working group of 23 business, labor, and public representatives tasked with creating legislation both sides could accept. Organizers maintained outside pressure through public events and a ballot initiative threat that polls showed would pass with 68-80% support. Research from national policy networks, particularly Berkeley Labor Center studies showing minimum wage increases didn't harm employment growth, proved persuasive to business representatives. The Seattle City Council unanimously passed the bill in June 2014.
Chicago activists adapted Seattle's model to reach a $13 minimum wage despite significant barriers: machine politics, racial segregation, non-binding ballot initiatives, and opposition from Mayor Rahm Emanuel. Organizers strategically placed a non-binding $15 minimum wage referendum on ballots in key precincts during March 2014 elections, winning 80% approval. This symbolic victory, combined with challenger Jesus "Chuy" Garcia's mayoral campaign and the epithet "Mayor 1%" pressured Emanuel to establish a working group.
By 2018, the movement shifted from municipal policies to state-level ballot initiatives in Republican-controlled states like Michigan, Missouri, Arkansas, Colorado, and Arizona. These campaigns were increasingly streamlined and cost-effective. Colorado's successful Amendment 70 operated on just $5 million with only four staff members, yet covered 150 times more workers than SeaTac's initiative at just 4.5 times the cost.
In Democratic-controlled states like Illinois, New Jersey, and Connecticut, $15 minimum wage laws passed through legislatures with minimal debate in 2019. Illinois' bill moved through both chambers with little testimony and quick gubernatorial approval, showing how the issue had transformed from controversial to routine business.
Глава 6
Targeted Hiring: Connecting Jobs to Racial Justice
The fight against racial inequality remains one of the most persistent challenges in urban political economy. Since the Great Migration, organizers have struggled to secure good jobs in communities of color, with civil rights activists initially focusing on desegregating public employment and creating affirmative action programs.
Targeted hiring policies represent a through-line in this work, moving local governments from passive to active roles in the labor market by leveraging public construction, contracting, and economic development to create jobs for structurally unemployed residents. These policies take various forms, from procedural requirements to use local employment services to outcome-based goals for marginalized populations.
Chicago's experiment with targeted hiring in the 1970s-80s illustrates both possibilities and constraints. Harold Washington's mayoral administration (1983-1987) emerged from organizing around jobs and economic development, drawing on neighborhood-based movements challenging downtown-oriented growth. "Local hiring" became central to Washington's platform, with the "Chicago First" program launching in 1987. However, the program faced fierce opposition from contractors who called the requirements "official intimidation," while construction trade unions had their own history of excluding Black workers. After Washington's death in 1987, momentum dissipated, and Mayor Richard M. Daley quietly killed the program in 1991.
The community benefits movement revived targeted hiring in the 2000s. As private investment returned to central cities, Community Benefits Agreements (CBAs) demanded developers compensate communities for projects receiving public subsidies or land-use approvals. CBAs typically included provisions beyond targeted hiring: living-wage requirements, community social spaces, environmental impact mitigation, and affordable housing.
By the late 2000s, San Francisco's First Source Hiring program and Local Hire policy were failing to meet their 50% resident hiring goals. In 2010, Chinese for Affirmative Action and Brightline Defense issued a damning report declaring that "the 'good faith efforts' approach has clearly failed" and advocating for "targeted hiring mandates." Rather than regulating the market, the city could enforce mandates as a "participant" in the construction market. This legal innovation convinced San Francisco's Board of Supervisors to pass the Mandatory Local Hire ordinance in 2011, creating a model ready for export to other cities.
In post-Katrina New Orleans, a city marked by extreme racial inequality, targeted hiring emerged from community organizing around the city's reconstruction boom. Despite billions in new investment, a 2013 report revealed 52% of working-age Black men were unemployed or out of the workforce, creating what activists called a "Black jobs crisis." Building on momentum from the Black Lives Matter movement with their "Black Workers Matter" campaign, organizers forced Mayor Mitch Landrieu's administration to establish a task force exploring targeted hiring.
By fall 2015, the administration unveiled "Hire NOLA," requiring 40% local hiring and 20% disadvantaged worker participation on city-funded projects exceeding $150,000. Though organizers expressed concerns about enforcement, the ordinance passed unanimously, pairing with a Living Wage Ordinance to broaden its coalition support.
Seattle's targeted hiring initiative emerged in response to tech-driven growth that exacerbated racial inequality. The Construction Jobs Equity Coalition mobilized after finding only 6% of city-funded construction work went to Seattle residents and just 3% to low-income community residents. Their "Priority Hire" program mandated 20% of hours on city projects over $5 million go to workers from economically distressed ZIP codes, bypassing constitutional limitations on explicit racial targeting.
Глава 7
Beyond Wages: The Struggle for Time and Dignity
Economic justice movements have expanded beyond wage issues to address workers' control over their time and ability to manage household responsibilities. Following the Great Recession, workers faced not just low wages but increasingly unpredictable schedules and limited protections for time off, creating a "functionally intersectional" crisis that affected every aspect of workers' lives.
Unlike minimum wage campaigns that tap into widespread understanding about fair pay, scheduling and time-off issues lack a clear vocabulary and organizing tradition. When interviewed, striking fast food workers often complained more about unpredictable scheduling than low wages-being sent home early after arranging childcare, facing "clopens" (closing late and opening early), and other practices that made stable life impossible.
Policy networks addressing social reproduction issues emerged in the late 1990s following welfare reform, as organizations like the Children's Defense Fund, Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, and newer groups like A Better Balance shifted focus to working poverty. Unlike minimum wage campaigns with their clear graphics and statistics, advocacy for sick time and fair scheduling relies more on narrative descriptions of problems that official labor statistics don't track.
Since 2012, twenty cities and states have passed paid time off laws, primarily in the form of sick days. The resulting legislation varies widely, with numerous exemptions and qualifications-Philadelphia exempts healthcare, Connecticut excludes businesses with fifty or fewer employees, and other laws exempt various government workers. The most progressive aspect is accelerating accrual rates to one hour per thirty worked, translating to about eight days annually for full-time workers-still meager by international standards.
Fair workweek policies exist in even smaller numbers-just six cities and three states-with inconsistent coverage across industries. These laws lack internal coherence, introducing heterogeneous bundles of reforms including advance notice requirements, compensation for schedule changes, minimum paid hours per shift, and rights to rest between shifts.
While sick days and fair scheduling never achieved the national prominence of the Fight for $15, they've successfully passed in numerous cities because they offered elected officials a way to demonstrate commitment to addressing inequality. Chicago's experience illustrates this dynamic perfectly-after securing a $13 minimum wage, labor organizers found Mayor Emanuel's administration fixated on matching New York Mayor de Blasio's progressive policies.
Despite policy victories, organizers have struggled to make the public recognize and act against inhumane scheduling practices. Unlike minimum wage laws that operate within the historically well-regulated world of wage labor with ready-made economic measures, social reproduction work remains largely invisible. There's no "Bureau of Household Care" to measure caring work, which is performed either without compensation or by underpaid, low-status workers.
Глава 8
Fighting Austerity Through Anti-Racism
Fiscal austerity has become a crucial target for economic and racial justice coalitions who recognize that achieving their goals requires universal public goods to bridge the gap between unstable work and basic needs. Budget cuts in cities have been ongoing for fifty years, with federal fiscal support to cities now less than one-quarter of their funding. This pressure has disproportionately affected public education, social services, and public health, while police and real estate development budgets remain robust.
Organizing against austerity faces two distinct challenges: the bewildering complexity of public finance creates barriers to grassroots mobilization, and the profusion of special districts and funds makes standardized policy approaches difficult. Activists have responded by simplifying their message-framing austerity directly as a problem of white supremacy.
Through the mid-2010s, organizers tried to become financial educators, conducting TIF district bus tours and PowerPoint presentations explaining complex financial instruments. These efforts largely failed-"We presented too many PowerPoints," admitted organizers. The breakthrough came when they abandoned technical education in favor of narrative framing centered on race. When one organizer showed graphs on subprime mortgages, participants suddenly connected: "Oh, I get it: it's a big conspiracy by the banks."
This shift to what Marshall Ganz calls "public narrative"-emotionally compelling stories rather than technical details-proved transformative. By naming perpetrators and centering racial inequality, organizers found a simplifying language that replaced exhausting technical details with emotionally compelling explanations.
The Chicago Teachers Union effectively challenged Mayor Emanuel's "Renaissance" plan to close dozens of schools in low-income neighborhoods on Chicago's South and West sides. The Caucus of Rank-and-File Educators (CORE) transformed the union's approach, shifting from narrow bargaining over pay to activism that connected education with Chicago's broader inequalities. They directly confronted racial issues, labeling the school closure plan as "educational apartheid" in their report "The Black and White of Education in Chicago Schools," which highlighted that 88 percent of students affected by school closures since 2001 were African American.
Tax increment financing (TIF) in Chicago exemplifies both chronic fiscal problems and acute crises for low-income communities. By 2000, TIF districts covered more than 30% of Chicago, freezing general-purpose property tax revenues at founding-year levels while diverting all future growth to "anti-blight" activities. Organizers gained traction against TIF by reframing it as a racial justice issue rather than a technical problem, simplifying complex financial mechanisms by showing how Wall Street itself began as a slave trading post.
As economic and racial justice coalitions expand beyond workplace issues, they increasingly target regressive tax structures at the state level. The Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute exemplifies this evolution, transforming from a semi-volunteer organization in the 1990s to a sophisticated advocacy group with ten employees by 2019. Their expanded staff now includes outreach directors focused on building alliances with communities of color and communications specialists who create resonant messaging about complex fiscal policy.
Глава 9
The Future of Urban Justice Movements
The recent success of social and economic justice movements in cities upsets traditional urban studies assumptions. These movements disprove warnings that mobile investors will punish cities for attempting redistribution. Their method of victory is particularly significant-uniting previously separated agendas around work and home, race and class.
Despite institutional threats like the Janus Supreme Court decision cutting public-sector union revenue, economic and racial justice coalitions have demonstrated remarkable resilience. Their power stems from multiple durable sources, including the decades-long urban "renaissance" of investment and repopulation. Their collaborative methods have become systematized over twenty-plus years, making each new policy campaign more efficient than the last. What once required enormous resources-like Chicago's minimum wage campaigns-now moves through legislatures with minimal effort, as policy entrepreneurship networks convert labor-intensive advocacy into reproducible campaigns.
The success of economic justice policy victories stems less from legislative votes than from the discursive framing that compels legislative bodies to act. Only in hindsight does the consensus on inequality seem inevitable-it took the Great Recession and movements like Occupy Wall Street to make inequality impossible to ignore. Teacher strikes demonstrate this power of problem framing: they succeeded not through organizational skill but by successfully rallying public support.
However, the $15 minimum wage is not justice. Fair workweek legislation provides limited support for workers balancing paid and unpaid labor. Justice movements embrace necessarily utopian visions that evolve as movements mature. Early economic and racial justice coalitions strategically minimized racial components, focusing on narrowly material demands fitted to the American welfare state. Their vision centered on wages, employment benefits, and consumption-specifically "standard" jobs offering forty weekly hours, "family-wage" jobs supporting dependents, or simply "good" jobs exceeding undefined thresholds.
These limited aspirations were products of their time, when expanding postwar incomes papered over glaring problems in this vision of justice through the workplace. This vision ignored how workplaces rationed access to "family wage" jobs for white men, declining public goods spending, rising costs of housing and healthcare, environmental costs of economic expansion, and the toll of repetitive work on human flourishing.
Racial justice framing has transformed activism by turning abstract inequalities into concrete, actionable problems that "cut issues with great effectiveness." This conceptual power has allowed movements to quickly frame issues like disinvestment, undervalued care work, financial systems, police violence, and COVID-19 as racial justice problems.
The most hopeful question is whether contemporary justice movements will transcend liberal pluralism's institutional means and goals. Current activists pursue visions rooted in New Deal era materialism-jobs, pay, housing-but alternatives like human development capabilities and Lefebvre's "right to the city" offer promising frameworks. Despite institutional disadvantages, justice activists increasingly shape rather than merely respond to problems, with mayors and council members now pledging loyalty to racial and economic equality. The work ahead is daunting but happening everywhere, allowing urban scholars to move citizens from the margins to the center of our stories.
