What is *The Venture Mindset* by Ilya Strebulaev about?

*The Venture Mindset* outlines a revolutionary approach to innovation inspired by Silicon Valley’s venture capital strategies. It teaches nine principles for making smarter decisions, embracing calculated risks, and fostering long-term growth, such as prioritizing teams over ideas, encouraging dissent, and cutting losses early. The book blends real-world examples (Netflix, MIT) with research to show how organizations can adopt this mindset for disruptive success.

Who should read *The Venture Mindset*?

Entrepreneurs, corporate leaders, investors, and innovation-focused professionals will benefit most. The book offers actionable strategies for venture capitalists seeking sharper decision-making, corporate teams aiming to overcome bureaucracy, and startups navigating scalability challenges. It’s particularly relevant for those in tech, finance, or industries undergoing rapid disruption.

Is *The Venture Mindset* worth reading?

Yes—it combines academic rigor with engaging storytelling, making complex concepts accessible. The nine principles, like “pattern recognition” and “staged investments,” are backed by Stanford research and case studies. Readers praise its practicality for decision-making in fast-paced environments, though critics note it leans heavily on Silicon Valley paradigms.

What are the 9 principles of the Venture Mindset?

The framework includes: - Embrace failure as a learning tool - Source ideas from diverse networks - Prioritize strong teams over specific ideas - Cultivate expertise for pattern recognition - Say “no” frequently to focus on high-potential bets - Encourage debate to avoid groupthink - Use staged investments to mitigate risk - Align incentives for long-term success - Extend time horizons for breakthrough innovation.

What are key quotes from *The Venture Mindset*?

Notable quotes include: - **“Failure isn’t an endpoint—it’s a diagnostic tool.”** - **“The best ideas often come from the edges of your network.”** - **“Venture success is 10% idea, 90% execution.”** These emphasize resilience, external collaboration, and execution—core themes explored through case studies like Netflix’s pivot from DVDs to streaming.

How does *The Venture Mindset* compare to *Atomic Habits*?

While *Atomic Habits* focuses on individual behavior change, *The Venture Mindset* targets organizational decision-making. Strebulaev’s work emphasizes systemic innovation frameworks (e.g., staged investments, dissent cultures) versus Clear’s micro-habit strategies. Both advocate long-term thinking, but *The Venture Mindset* is tailored for teams and investors.

What criticisms exist about *The Venture Mindset*?

Some argue the principles are easier for VC-funded startups to adopt than traditional corporations. Others note the book underplays the role of luck in venture success. However, its structured approach to risk management and team dynamics is widely praised.

How does Ilya Strebulaev’s background influence the book?

As a Stanford finance professor and founder of the Stanford GSB Venture Capital Initiative, Strebulaev combines 20+ years of academic research with insights from advising firms like Netflix. This dual expertise ensures rigorous analysis of VC trends and practical corporate applications.

벤처 마인드셋

더 스마트하게 베팅하고 비범한 성장을 달성하는 방법

일리야 스트레불라예프 & 알렉스 당

4.22(345 Reviews)

벤처 마인드셋 개요

스탠퍼드 대학교 일리야 스트레불라예프 교수의 베스트셀러 "벤처 마인드셋(Venture Mindset)"은 벤처 캐피털리스트처럼 생각하는 방식이 어떻게 비약적인 성장을 이끄는지 밝혀냅니다. 구글의 에릭 슈미트가 "강력하고 실용적인 교훈으로 가득 차 있다"라고 평한 이 역설적인 전략은 무엇일까요? 실패를 혁신으로 바꾸는 9가지 원칙을 확인해 보세요.

전달 방식을 선택하세요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

벤처 마인드셋의 같은 아이디어를 담았습니다. 나에게 맞는 목소리, 깊이, 속도를 고르고 언제든 바꿔 보세요.

1장

The Entrepreneurial Revolution in Your Pocket

In a world where billion-dollar ideas can start on napkins, one book stands out for demystifying the secret sauce behind today's most transformative companies. "The Venture Mindset" has become a favorite among tech CEOs and innovation leaders for its practical approach to thinking like Silicon Valley's most successful investors. When Eric Yuan founded a videoconferencing startup called Saasbee in 2011, most venture capitalists dismissed it as entering an overcrowded market. Yet three believers at Qualcomm Ventures saw something special and invested $500,000 despite their colleagues' skepticism. That company, later renamed Zoom, would become one of the most successful investments in venture capital history. This pattern of unconventional thinking-embracing risk, seeking contrarian opportunities, and backing extraordinary people-forms the backbone of a decision-making framework that has reshaped our world, one unicorn at a time.

2장

The Venture Mindset: A Different Species of Decision-Making

The Venture Mindset represents a fundamentally different approach to decision-making that has evolved through decades of trial and error, primarily in Silicon Valley. It's the secret operating system running behind every successful venture capital firm and the companies they create. This mindset differs dramatically from traditional business thinking in nearly every decision area-from hiring processes to investment selection to idea incubation. At its core, the Venture Mindset embraces failure as an essential part of finding extraordinary success. Unlike traditional companies that fear mistakes, VCs understand that strikeouts don't matter if you occasionally hit home runs. This counterintuitive approach explains why venture capitalists remain resilient despite frequent failures-they operate in winner-take-all markets where a single successful investment can outperform all others combined. Consider ride-sharing apps: dozens received funding, but only Uber and Lyft succeeded at scale. This pattern repeats across industries, with the typical VC portfolio seeing just one in twenty investments becoming a runaway success. This "home run" approach means VCs fear missing the next Google far more than backing failures. As VC Bill Gurley puts it: "If you invest in something that doesn't work, you lose 1X your money. If you miss Google, you lose 10,000X your money." This mindset remains exceedingly rare in large organizations, where managers typically fear errors of commission more than errors of omission-the opposite of the VC approach. Traditional companies operate with meticulous planning processes that systematically filter out small, experimental projects. The annual budgeting cycle, with its emphasis on detailed financial metrics and ROI calculations, resists the unpredictable pivots that innovative ventures often require. Companies attempting to embrace the Venture Mindset must avoid three critical pitfalls. First, "playing it too safe" by confusing incremental A/B testing with truly bold experimentation. Second, "betting the farm" on a single massive initiative rather than diversifying across multiple smaller bets. Third, letting "a thousand flowers bloom" without proper focus or discipline. The key is finding balance: making bold bets, diversifying risk across multiple initiatives, and regularly culling unsuccessful projects. Smart organizations structure their innovation portfolios as three-tiered pyramids: core business investments with incremental innovations at the base, "adjacent innovation" in the middle, and high-risk disruptive innovations at the top. Google formalized this approach with a 70/20/10 resource allocation rule, with 10% dedicated to moonshot initiatives. Their Google X division operates like an internal VC fund, evaluating hundreds of speculative ideas annually and funding only the most promising ones.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

벤처 마인드셋의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

3장

Venturing Beyond Your Four Walls

Great innovations rarely emerge from within corporate walls. The Venture Mindset requires actively seeking opportunities in unexpected places, building diverse networks, and remaining open to unconventional ideas. Consider Pejman Nozad's extraordinary journey from Iranian immigrant working at a rug store to respected Silicon Valley investor. While selling expensive rugs in Palo Alto, he built trust relationships with wealthy Silicon Valley customers, eventually launching a tech venture fund operating from the back of the shop. This positioned him to meet Dropbox founders Arash Ferdowsi and Drew Houston at a Y Combinator demo day in 2007, arranging the crucial introduction to Sequoia Capital that led to a $1.2 million investment eventually returning $2 billion. The power of networks drives venture capital success. Research shows about half of all VC deals come from investors' professional networks. Unlike corporate executives, VCs work tirelessly expanding these connections, maintaining networks twice the size of corporate VCs. But effective networking isn't just about quantity-it's about diversity across industries, roles, and backgrounds. Great VCs don't passively wait for opportunities-they actively hunt for them. Brian Jacobs of Emergence Capital exemplifies this approach. While visiting Salesforce Tower's construction site, he discovered Building Robotics, a startup providing temperature control software. Recognizing its potential, he secured an introduction to the founders and invested, eventually seeing the company acquired by Siemens. Modern VCs employ sophisticated methods to identify opportunities. Paul Arnold's Switch Ventures uses data science to evaluate founders, analyzing datasets of over 100,000 entrepreneurs to identify those most likely to build unicorns. Similarly, Sequoia's "Early Bird" system tracks app store activity, helping them discover promising startups before they seek investment. Revolutionary technologies often follow unlikely paths to success. Chester Carlson's xerography invention was rejected by industry giants like RCA, GE, Kodak, and IBM for five years before finding success. Steve Jobs was rejected when he offered Atari founder Nolan Bushnell one-third of Apple for just $50,000. Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak's personal computer concept was rejected five times by his employer Hewlett-Packard. These rejections stem from the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome-a corporate mindset that rejects external ideas. Research shows this creative myopia is widespread: a study of nearly one million patents found inventors at large firms disproportionately draw from their own company's prior work while ignoring competitors' innovations. To combat this syndrome, organizations must implement specific mechanisms for sourcing external ideas. The story of Nespresso illustrates this perfectly. Eric Favre, a Nestle engineer, discovered the secret to perfect espresso crema during a vacation in Rome. Despite working in Nestle's packaging department, Favre developed a prototype that encapsulated coffee in sealed capsules where trapped air created the perfect frothy espresso. Though management was initially skeptical, Favre's persistence over ten years eventually transformed Nestle's business.

4장

The Prepared Mind Sees What Others Miss

When Sameer Gandhi met Dropbox's founders in 2007, his quick investment decision wasn't mere luck but the result of a prepared mind. Having researched file sharing extensively and met countless teams in this space, he recognized that Drew Houston and Arash Ferdowsi understood both the technical and design challenges that had stumped others. This pattern recognition-developed through countless meetings with entrepreneurs and hours studying pitch decks-enables VCs to make seemingly instantaneous decisions that are actually built on extensive preparation. Like scientists such as Fleming discovering penicillin, the Venture Mindset combines serendipity with preparation-seeing opportunities others miss because your mind is tuned to recognize them. While traditional companies often suffer from "analysis paralysis" when evaluating new ideas, the Venture Mindset relies on three core mechanisms for faster decision-making. First, do your spadework outside company walls, as demonstrated by Yuri Milner who built extensive spreadsheets tracking global social networks before successfully investing in Facebook despite initial rejection. Second, leverage deep industry expertise, exemplified by Bonny Simi who transformed JetBlue's innovation approach by founding JetBlue Technology Ventures. With her unique background as pilot, Olympian and Stanford graduate, she combined airline industry knowledge with VC thinking to identify truly valuable startups while quickly dismissing those addressing non-critical problems. The "Prepared Mind" approach is exemplified by firms like Accel Partners, whose partners constantly think about future trends before searching for companies that fit their thesis. Theresia Gouw, while at Accel, identified Google's weakness in "parameterized" search through discussions with search expert Philip Nelson. She realized Google struggled with detailed queries like travel options with specific parameters, creating an opportunity in vertical niche search. This insight led her to invest in Trulia, which later went public successfully. Decision-making speed is crucial in innovation. VCs typically give entrepreneurs just twenty minutes to pitch, and most don't even get that opportunity. Research shows Hollywood producers decide on scripts in minutes or even seconds, with one study finding typical decision times of just 45 seconds. Dating decisions follow similar patterns-half of people decide about second dates within 2-3 minutes. Job recruiters hold the speed record, spending just 7.4 seconds scanning resumes for pattern-matching. However, preparation doesn't mean relying on mental shortcuts or ignoring facts. A prepared mind must guard against biases related to race, gender or background that might cause overlooking unusual startups or uncommon ideas that don't fit established patterns.

벤처 마인드셋에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

5장

The Art of Saying No: Why Selectivity Matters

The venture capital approach to decision-making is remarkably thorough-VCs spend an average of 118 hours on due diligence per investment they actually make, with some firms like Emergence Capital investing up to 400 hours. This process culminates in the "investment memorandum," a concise document that doesn't hide risks but brings them to light. Unlike corporate presentations designed to advocate for ideas, these memos identify weaknesses, outline various scenarios from disaster to success, and stimulate frank discussion. Despite their reputation as risk-takers, VCs call themselves "risk-reduction engineers," methodically assessing management teams, business models, and market potential while conducting extensive reference checks. Bill Maris of Google Ventures exemplified this approach when evaluating Theranos in 2013. Despite the company's impressive partnerships and board featuring political celebrities like Henry Kissinger, Maris spotted red flags: no healthcare experts on the board, no reputable biotech VC investors, and secretive leadership. When his team member attempted to test Theranos's blood-testing technology at Walgreens, they encountered suspicious delays. While VCs de-risk investments, they avoid analysis paralysis. Their meetings are focused, memos concise, and decisions swift-unlike corporations where projects languish for months or years. This bureaucratic clutter kills innovation. IBM's failed Fireworks Partners venture illustrates this problem-some investments were still under review when the entire initiative was abandoned. Being highly selective isn't just for venture capitalists-it's a skill anyone can master. The key is efficiently rejecting most opportunities before approving any, involving multiple people with prepared minds who aren't afraid to disagree. The winning ratio should be around 1 to 100. The Pulitzer Prize selection process demonstrates this approach-judges read 300 books each but nominate just three, using a two-speed approach similar to VCs. Google's hiring process (with below 1% acceptance) and homebuyers' selection process follow similar patterns: quick initial screening followed by deeper due diligence on promising candidates.

6장

Betting on People: The Jockey Matters More Than the Horse

Ali Tamaseb's research shows that "super founders"-entrepreneurs with prior successful startup experience-are three times more likely to succeed than other founders. This insight reflects how VCs often invest primarily based on the team, sometimes regardless of industry or market conditions. The case of Tiny Speck illustrates this principle perfectly: when their game Glitch failed spectacularly, investors like Accel Partners refused to take back the remaining $5 million, instead encouraging founders Stewart Butterfield and Cal Henderson to pivot. This trust in the team rather than the product led to the creation of Slack, which eventually sold to Salesforce for $27 billion. While in horse racing the animal itself accounts for about 90% of performance with jockeys contributing only 10%, venture capital operates with reverse priorities. Research with over 1,000 VCs revealed that 47% consider the team the most important factor in investment decisions-far outweighing any single business factor like business model, product, or market size. This team-first approach becomes even more pronounced at earlier investment stages. VCs know that ideas are abundant, but execution makes all the difference. As General Georges Doriot put it: "Always consider investing in a grade A man with a grade B idea. Never invest in a grade B man with a grade A idea." Gmail began as "Project Caribou"-a joke product built by a single engineer that launched on April Fool's Day 2004. Paul Buchheit, Google's employee #23, created what would become a 2-billion-user product with an incredibly vague mandate: "build an email thing." The project succeeded because Google created the right environment-a racetrack-for internal innovation. Innovation requires leadership, not management. VCs evaluate founders on character and charisma, looking for those who energize others and treat everyone with respect. Kate Mitchell of Scale Venture Partners checks how founders treat receptionists, believing those who can't show respect to everyone will struggle to lead teams. Rather than starting with ideas and finding managers, the venture mindset identifies leaders first and lets them innovate. With disruptive innovation, industry knowledge can sometimes be a hindrance-Tony Xu had no logistics experience before founding DoorDash, and Airbnb's founders had no hotel industry background. VCs seek "well-rounded square pegs"-pattern breakers with learning velocity who can keep pace with exponentially scaling startups.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

벤처 마인드셋의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

7장

Agree to Disagree: The Power of Constructive Conflict

VCs are disagreement seekers rather than consensus seekers. As Andy Rachleff of Benchmark Capital states, "The only way to make outsized returns in Venture Capital is to be right and non-consensus." Mike Maples reinforces this: "You can't outinvest others by investing in whatever everybody thinks." The chapter warns against the "you scratch my back and I scratch yours" pattern that leads to mock consensus driven by political considerations. This happened at Enron, where performance reviews involved backroom deals between managers. In VC firms, partners must be able to safely critique each other's positions without fear of reprisal. Ray Dalio insists organizations win by becoming "radically open-minded" and "replacing the joy of being proven right with the joy of learning what is true." The VC methodology includes an obligation to dissent-as General John Monash told his men: "When I really want [your loyal service] most is when you think I am wrong." VCs combat group biases with four specific mechanisms. First, they keep teams small-typically 3-5 partners plus junior members-ensuring everyone present contributes. This aligns with Amazon's "two-pizza team" principle and research showing optimal group size is 4-5 people. Second, they implement "juniors speak first" to prevent HIPPO (Highest-Paid Person's Opinion) domination. Junior team members often possess valuable "soft" information from customer conversations and market analysis. Third, they assign devil's advocates to argue against investments. Some firms like a16z designate "red teams" to oppose deals, similar to Warren Buffett hiring separate advisers to argue for and against acquisitions. Finally, they collect independent feedback before meetings, with team members sharing opinions on investment opportunities without seeing others' input first. This reveals genuine differences of opinion and liberates discussion. Many successful VC firms have institutionalized this approach. At Venrock, partners vigorously debate deals, but the partner who brought the opportunity makes the final decision unilaterally. This process prevented them from missing opportunities like Dollar Shave Club, which was later acquired for $1 billion.

8장

Double Down or Quit: The Power of Sequential Decision-Making

The Venture Mindset requires flexibility-being prepared to either double down or quit with each new piece of information. This approach begins with experimentation: launching a "minimum viable product" (MVP) or "minimum lovable product" (MLP) with limited functionality, then adding features only if initial tests succeed. While business schools teach commitment-based decision models (like NPV and IRR calculations), VCs value flexibility-what academics call "real options." This approach recognizes the right, but not obligation, to take future actions. Just as poker players receive limited information from initial cards and must decide whether to fold, call, or raise as more cards are revealed, VCs make sequential investment decisions as startups progress. The Airbnb story exemplifies this approach. Sequoia Capital's initial $600,000 seed investment (at a $2.5 million valuation) was just the beginning. As Airbnb demonstrated growth-expanding to 8,000 locations with 700,000 bookings-Sequoia doubled down in Series A. Through subsequent funding rounds, the valuation skyrocketed to $40 billion at IPO, eventually surpassing $100 billion. We humans resist cutting our losses, even in life-or-death situations. This "escalation of commitment" affects mountain climbers near Everest's summit and business leaders alike. Amateur poker players demonstrate this bias by refusing to fold losing hands, while traders like Nick Leeson of Barings Bank make increasingly larger bets trying to recover losses. The TV show "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?" offers three critical lifelines that mirror VC best practices for avoiding escalation of commitment: "Phone-a-Friend" teaches us not to double down alone. Smart VCs involve partners in follow-on decisions to counterbalance bias. Some firms like Lightspeed Capital use dedicated "reinvestment teams" to independently challenge assumptions. "Ask the Audience" emphasizes seeking outsiders' perspectives. VCs require new investors to lead follow-on rounds, as they lack existing bias. Research shows rounds led by new investors yield better outcomes. "50-50" reminds us to quit often enough. Only about half of startups survive each funding stage, with just 1 in 60 becoming unicorns. VCs fund startups for 12-18 months, then ruthlessly evaluate progress.

벤처 마인드셋에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

9장

Making the Pie Bigger: Aligned Incentives Drive Success

Modern VCs operate on the "2 and 20" compensation model-2% management fee regardless of performance, plus 20% of profits after returning investors' capital. This carried interest, a term from sailing voyages, aligns VC interests with investors. VCs insist everyone critical to a startup's success becomes an owner with meaningful equity, making founders' upside unlimited while protecting against downside risk. This approach both motivates hard work and attracts innovative, risk-tolerant talent. Research confirms these mechanisms work: experiments show pay-for-performance participants solve more anagrams, and jockeys paid percentage-based compensation perform better than those on fixed retainers. In 1957, a compensation revolution began in what would become Silicon Valley when eight engineers left William Shockley's lab to launch their semiconductor venture. With Arthur Rock's help, they secured funding from Sherman Fairchild, each receiving 7.5% ownership. When Fairchild later bought them out for $3 million, removing their equity upside, all eight eventually left to start their own companies. These "Fairchildren" spawned hundreds of ventures worth trillions today, including Intel, AMD, and Apple. Learning from Fairchild's mistake, they implemented widespread employee stock options, which became the industry standard. Risk preferences vary dramatically based on incentive structures, not personality types. Corporate managers show extreme risk aversion, with 90% requiring at least a 60% chance of success before investing. The payoff chart explains why: in VC-backed startups, founders get nothing if the company sells for less than the investment, but capture massive upside in successful outcomes. This asymmetry encourages risk-taking on innovative projects with higher volatility but bigger potential returns. Corporate managers face the opposite incentives-fixed salaries with minimal upside but significant downside if risky projects fail. The same person would make entirely different decisions in these two environments. The Venture Mindset prioritizes value creation over value extraction-growing a bigger pie rather than fighting for a larger slice. This principle applies beyond venture capital to partnerships like consulting or legal firms, where the choice between adding partners (dividing profits among more people) or maintaining exclusivity is constant.

10장

Great Things Take Time: The Patience to Build Unicorns

The chapter opens with the story of Matagorda Island, Texas, where in 1981 the first-ever US privately funded commercial rocket exploded during launch. This failure marked the beginning of private space ventures, followed by Space Services Inc.'s successful launch a year later. Twenty-five years later, Elon Musk's SpaceX faced similar failures with Falcon 1, experiencing three consecutive launch failures before finally succeeding on the fourth attempt in 2008. Despite public criticism, SpaceX secured crucial venture funding after these failures, eventually transforming into a $137 billion company launching rockets weekly. Like sequoia trees that need fire to release their seeds and grow, great companies often emerge from times of crisis. The section tells the story of Amadeo Peter Giannini, who founded Bank of Italy (later Bank of America) and walked 17 miles to rescue $80,000 from his bank during the 1906 San Francisco earthquake and fire. While other bankers closed for months, Giannini set up a makeshift desk on the waterfront the next day, offering loans on handshakes to help rebuild the city. What makes VCs successful unicorn shepherds is patience-they're stuck with illiquid investments for years, often waiting through long periods of cash burn before seeing returns. The average unicorn takes nine years before IPO, with companies like MongoDB, Uber, and DocuSign taking 10-15 years. This patience requirement creates a different mental model-like buying versus renting a car. While traditional investors focus on short-term profitability, VCs think about long-term potential and future market size, willing to endure the J-curve where things get worse before better. Thinking long-term is a choice that fundamentally changes decision-making. With a short 3-year outlook, a power plant COO would cut costs to boost financials for sale, but with a 10-15 year outlook, he'd invest in retrofitting and repairs. This same principle applies across business decisions from hiring to training. The famous Stanford marshmallow experiment demonstrates the power of delayed gratification. Children who could resist eating one marshmallow for 15 minutes to receive two later showed better outcomes in academic achievement and stress management years later-with SAT scores averaging 210 points higher than those who couldn't wait. Successful children employed specific strategies: looking away, playing with toys, singing, or even napping rather than staring at the temptation. This principle applies to adult decision-making too, where most people demonstrate "hyperbolic discounting," valuing immediate rewards disproportionately higher than future ones. When making career decisions, focus on long-term value rather than short-term metrics like starting salary-think like a VC about your career as an important long-term project. The Venture Mindset isn't just for Silicon Valley; it's a powerful framework for anyone seeking to create extraordinary value in an increasingly uncertain world.

★★★★★

벤처 마인드셋 완독을 축하합니다

100만 명 이상의 학습자가 사랑합니다

“23일째 매일 사용하고 있어요. 이제 제 일상의 한 부분이 되었습니다.”

jayallen

벤처 마인드셋의 핵심 주제

contrarian investing
power law returns
innovation portfolio management
asymmetric risk
venture capital methodology

벤처 마인드셋의 명언

VCs fear missing the next Google far more than backing failures.
Failure [is] an essential part of finding extraordinary success.
The Venture Mindset requires actively seeking opportunities in unexpected places.
Great innovations rarely emerge from within corporate walls.

벤처 마인드셋의 등장인물

Ilya StrebulaevAuthor and expert on venture capital mindsets
Alex DangAuthor and expert on corporate innovation
Eric YuanFounder of Zoom and case study in persistence
Pejman NozadRug seller turned successful venture capitalist
Bill GurleyProminent VC known for the 'home run' philosophy

저자 소개

*벤처 마인드셋(The Venture Mindset)*의 공동 저자인 일리야 스트레불라예프(Ilya Strebulaev)와 알렉스 당(Alex Dang)은 혁신 전략과 벤처 캐피털 원칙 분야의 저명한 전문가들입니다.

스트레불라예프는 스탠퍼드 경영대학원의 사모펀드 담당 데이비드 S. 로벨(David S. Lobel) 교수입니다. 그는 스탠퍼드 벤처 캐피털 이니셔티브(Venture Capital Initiative)를 설립했으며, VC 의사결정에 관한 최고의 학술적 권위자로 널리 인정받고 있습니다.

노련한 기술 경영자인 알렉스 당은 아마존에서 혁신적인 이니셔티브를 이끌었으며, 맥킨지 파트너로서 글로벌 기업들에 자문을 제공했습니다. 그들의 저서는 수십 년간의 연구와 실무 경험을 결합하여, 조직이 최고의 벤처 캐피털리스트들로부터 위험에 기민하게 대응하는 프레임워크를 채택하는 방법을 가르칩니다.

스트레불라예프의 획기적인 연구는 월스트리트 저널(The Wall Street Journal), 하버드 비즈니스 리뷰(Harvard Business Review), 블룸버그(Bloomberg) 등에 소개되었으며, 알렉스 당의 운영 전문성은 AI 기반 벤처와 확장 가능한 디지털 생태계를 아우릅니다. 이 책은 전 구글 CEO 에릭 슈미트(Eric Schmidt)와 같은 업계 리더들로부터 찬사를 받았으며, AI 파괴적 혁신을 헤쳐 나가는 시의적절한 통찰력으로 *파이낸셜 타임스(Financial Times)*의 주목을 받았습니다.

두 저자는 혁신을 배양하고자 하는 포춘 500대 기업과 정부 기관을 대상으로 경영진 워크숍을 활발히 이끌고 있습니다.

벤처 마인드셋 요약 다운로드

벤처 마인드셋 요약을 무료 PDF 또는 EPUB으로 받으세요. 인쇄하거나 오프라인에서 언제든 읽을 수 있습니다.

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

Venture Deals

Brad Feld

The founder's mentality

Chris Zook & James Allen

The Innovation Mindset

Lorraine Marchand

The Investor's Paradox: Why Great VCs Think Like Entrepreneurs 책 표지

3 sources

The Investor's Paradox: Why Great VCs Think Like Entrepreneurs

New to Big

David Kidder

The Lean Startup

Eric Ries

The Creator Mindset

Nir Bashan

The Serendipity Mindset

Christian Busch

이 책에 대한 FAQ

더 알아보기

학습 계획

The Unshakable Founder Mindset

This learning plan is designed for ambitious entrepreneurs who need to balance mental fortitude with aggressive market disruption. It combines ancient philosophy with modern scaling strategies to help founders build resilient, inclusive, and high-growth companies.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

The Systems Thinking Advantage for Founders

In the volatile world of startups, founders often fall into the trap of reactive management. This learning plan is essential for entrepreneurs who want to move beyond chaos by mastering the structural dynamics of their business. It is ideal for early-stage leaders aiming to build scalable, stable organizations through first-principles design.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Entrepreneurship

This comprehensive guide is designed for aspiring founders and leaders looking to transition from initial idea to a scalable enterprise. It provides the essential roadmap for navigating the high-stakes journey of building, funding, and leading a modern business.

5 h 18 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Viral psych for founders

This learning plan is essential for startup founders and product leaders who want to move beyond traditional marketing and build products with viral growth baked into their DNA. It combines cutting-edge behavioral psychology, proven persuasion science, and systematic growth engineering to help you create products that naturally spread, retain users, and scale exponentially. Perfect for early-stage founders seeking product-market fit and growth-stage leaders optimizing for viral expansion.

4 h 40 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Inspiring Entrepreneur Models

This learning plan is essential for aspiring entrepreneurs and business builders who want to move beyond theory and learn from proven success models. It's designed for anyone ready to launch their own venture or scale an existing business, combining inspirational stories with actionable frameworks across every stage of the entrepreneurial journey.

5 h 45 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Billionaire Mindset: From Frustration to Manifestation

This plan is designed for ambitious professionals feeling stuck in their current career trajectory. It bridges the gap between emotional intelligence and strategic execution, making it essential for anyone ready to transition from frustration to high-level success.

3 h•4 섹션

학습 계획

CEO mindset

This learning plan is essential for senior executives, emerging leaders, and entrepreneurs who aspire to think and operate at the CEO level. It bridges the gap between functional expertise and enterprise-wide leadership by developing the strategic thinking, execution capabilities, and leadership presence that define world-class chief executives.

4 h 30 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Zero to One for Young Founders

This plan is essential for aspiring entrepreneurs who want to build companies that create something entirely new rather than just iterating on existing ideas. It is designed for young founders seeking to master the strategic mechanics of vertical progress and long-term planning.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

지금 바로 학습 여정을 시작하세요

3장

벤처 마인드셋

개요벤처 마인드셋 개요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

The Entrepreneurial Revolution in Your Pocket

The Venture Mindset: A Different Species of Decision-Making

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Venturing Beyond Your Four Walls

The Prepared Mind Sees What Others Miss

벤처 마인드셋에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Art of Saying No: Why Selectivity Matters

Betting on People: The Jockey Matters More Than the Horse

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Agree to Disagree: The Power of Constructive Conflict

Double Down or Quit: The Power of Sequential Decision-Making

벤처 마인드셋에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Making the Pie Bigger: Aligned Incentives Drive Success

Great Things Take Time: The Patience to Build Unicorns

벤처 마인드셋 완독을 축하합니다

벤처 마인드셋의 핵심 주제

벤처 마인드셋의 명언

벤처 마인드셋의 등장인물

저자 소개

벤처 마인드셋 요약 다운로드

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

이 책에 대한 FAQ

What is The Venture Mindset by Ilya Strebulaev about?

Who should read The Venture Mindset?

Is The Venture Mindset worth reading?

What are the 9 principles of the Venture Mindset?

더 알아보기

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

The Entrepreneurial Revolution in Your Pocket

The Venture Mindset: A Different Species of Decision-Making

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Venturing Beyond Your Four Walls

The Prepared Mind Sees What Others Miss

벤처 마인드셋에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Art of Saying No: Why Selectivity Matters

Betting on People: The Jockey Matters More Than the Horse

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Agree to Disagree: The Power of Constructive Conflict

Double Down or Quit: The Power of Sequential Decision-Making

벤처 마인드셋에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Making the Pie Bigger: Aligned Incentives Drive Success

Great Things Take Time: The Patience to Build Unicorns

벤처 마인드셋 완독을 축하합니다

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

더 알아보기

벤처 마인드셋 개요