Who should read *The Surprising Science of Meetings*?

This book is essential for managers, team leaders, and employees who regularly organize or attend meetings. It’s particularly valuable for professionals in corporate, tech, or nonprofit sectors seeking data-driven methods to reduce meeting fatigue and improve collaboration. Rogelberg’s insights cater to both novice leaders and seasoned executives aiming to foster accountability and productivity.

Is *The Surprising Science of Meetings* worth reading?

Yes—the book is praised for its actionable advice and rigorous research. *Business Insider* calls it “compelling,” while organizational psychologist Adam Grant hails Rogelberg as the “world’s leading expert on how to fix meetings.” Readers gain tools to shorten meetings, engage participants, and measure success, making it a high-ROD (return on decisions) resource for workplace efficiency.

What are the key concepts in *The Surprising Science of Meetings*?

Core ideas include: - **Optimal meeting length**: Shorter, focused sessions outperform marathons. - **Participant psychology**: Smaller groups (4-7 people) enhance engagement. - **Agenda design**: Prioritize critical topics and allocate time proportionally. - **Host accountability**: Leaders must model preparedness and solicit feedback. Rogelberg also debunks myths, like the necessity of weekly status updates.

How does *The Surprising Science of Meetings* compare to other leadership books?

Unlike generic leadership guides, Rogelberg’s work zeroes in on meetings as a microcosm of organizational health. While books like *Atomic Habits* focus on personal routines, this title offers a systems-level approach to collective efficiency. It’s frequently compared to Patrick Lencioni’s *Death by Meeting* but stands out for its empirical depth and focus on behavioral science.

What actionable tips does Steven G. Rogelberg offer for better meetings?

- **Cancel unnecessary meetings**: 15-20% of meetings could be eliminated with no downside. - **Use a “reverse agenda”**: List decisions needed first, then allocate time. - **Encourage “meeting sprints”**: Cap discussions at 45 minutes to maintain focus. - **Rotate facilitators**: Reduces leader bias and fosters inclusivity.

What are common criticisms of *The Surprising Science of Meetings*?

Some reviewers note the advice leans heavily on corporate settings, with less guidance for remote or hybrid environments. Others suggest the book could explore systemic causes of meeting dysfunction (e.g., organizational culture) more deeply. However, its practicality and research-backed framework outweigh these gaps.

How does *The Surprising Science of Meetings* address virtual meetings?

While primarily focused on in-person interactions, Rogelberg’s principles apply universally: clear agendas, minimized multitasking, and proactive timekeeping. He emphasizes camera-on policies and using breakout rooms for large virtual groups—a prescient take given the post-2020 shift to remote work.

회의의 과학 요약

Q: What is *The Surprising Science of Meetings* by Steven G. Rogelberg about?

*The Surprising Science of Meetings* provides evidence-based strategies to transform unproductive meetings into efficient, engaging sessions. Drawing on 15+ years of research and surveys of 5,000+ employees, Rogelberg identifies common meeting pitfalls (e.g., poor time management, disengagement) and offers actionable fixes, such as optimizing attendee lists and refining agendas. The book combines organizational psychology with real-world examples to help leaders eliminate wasted time and boost outcomes.

팀을 최고의 성과로 이끄는 방법

스티븐 로겔버그

3.64(820 Reviews)

회의의 과학 요약 개요

25개 이상의 "베스트" 리스트에 이름을 올린 과학적 기반의 회의 전략으로 당신의 업무 공간을 혁신하십시오. 스탠딩 회의가 앉아서 하는 회의보다 시간이 적게 걸리는 이유와 침묵 속의 브레인스토밍이 구두 세션보다 뛰어난 성과를 내는 이유를 확인해 보세요. 이는 IBM, P&G, SEC가 신뢰하는 인사이트입니다.

전달 방식을 선택하세요

다양한 학습 방식으로 회의의 과학 요약 살펴보기

회의의 과학의 같은 아이디어를 담았습니다. 나에게 맞는 목소리, 깊이, 속도를 고르고 언제든 바꿔 보세요.

1장

Meetings: The Hidden Productivity Killer We Love to Hate

Imagine walking into your office on Monday morning to discover that all your meetings for the week have been canceled. Would you feel relieved or concerned? For most professionals, the answer is a complicated mix of both. In America alone, a staggering 55 million meetings occur daily, consuming approximately $1.4 trillion annually-roughly 8.2% of the 2014 GDP. Even more troubling, an estimated $250 billion of that is completely wasted on ineffective gatherings. The Surprising Science of Meetings by Steven G. Rogelberg has been hailed as a game-changer by organizational leaders worldwide, with Adam Grant calling it "the most important book on meetings ever written." Drawing on fifteen years of groundbreaking research across hundreds of organizations, Rogelberg doesn't just identify what's wrong with our meetings-he provides evidence-based solutions that can transform them from energy-draining obligations into productive, engaging experiences that benefit both organizational outcomes and individual careers.

2장

The Meeting Epidemic: More Time, Less Productivity

The scale of meetings in modern organizations is truly staggering. Since 1976, the number of daily workplace meetings in the United States has skyrocketed from 11 million to approximately 55 million. Non-managers attend about eight meetings weekly, while managers participate in twelve, with executives spending 56-60% of their working hours in meetings. For many CEOs, the burden is even heavier-university chancellors average seven meetings totaling nearly five hours daily, while nonprofit executives often spend six and a half hours in meetings, many of which are simply preparing for other meetings. This proliferation reflects shifting organizational values emphasizing inclusion, empowerment, teamwork, and flatter hierarchies. But the financial impact is enormous. Beyond the $1.4 trillion annual cost, individual companies like Xerox spend over $100 million yearly just on meeting time. These figures actually underestimate the true cost by excluding facilities, equipment, opportunity costs, and the psychological toll of bad meetings. The frustrating reality is that most organizations simply accept poor meetings as inevitable. While surveys about meeting effectiveness vary widely-some showing 50-70% considered wasteful, others indicating most meetings are somewhat productive-the truth likely falls somewhere in between. Meetings are generally negative experiences, but with some valuable interactions mixed in, often tied to leaders who excel at running them. What matters most is your organization's specific return on meeting investment. Using a Meeting Quality Assessment tool, you can calculate a "Wasted Meeting Time Index" by evaluating five key areas: meeting design, time dynamics, interpersonal dynamics, discussion dynamics, and post-meeting activities. Scores between 0-20% indicate productive meetings (above typical), 21-40% suggest hit-or-miss meetings with considerable waste (sadly typical), and scores above 41% indicate meetings needing substantial improvement.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

회의의 과학 요약의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

3장

The Meeting Paradox: Necessary Evil or Untapped Opportunity?

Meetings are easy targets for ridicule. We've all heard the sarcastic quips: "A meeting is an event where minutes are taken and hours are wasted," or "Meetings are indispensable when you don't want to accomplish anything." Management guru Peter Drucker even suggested meetings were symptoms of bad organization. But contrary to popular belief, eliminating meetings isn't the solution. Schedules with too few meetings actually create substantial risks. Meetings serve vital organizational functions. They provide employees with essential information, inclusion, support, voice, and community. They help people connect in human ways, building relationships and networks. Meetings efficiently bring together ideas and opinions, helping everyone perform better through coordination and cooperation. They help make sense of organizational challenges and ambiguities, foster commitment to goals, and bring individuals together as a coherent whole. Research actually shows that employees want meetings as part of their ideal workday. The solution isn't eliminating meetings but making them better through evidence-based practices derived from meeting science-the systematic study of what happens before, during, and after meetings. Meeting science employs various complementary approaches including field surveys, longitudinal studies, and laboratory experiments. Field surveys collect data from managers and employees about meetings and job attitudes, while laboratory studies manipulate meeting conditions to test specific variables like standing versus sitting meetings or emotional contagion among participants. As Andy Grove of Intel noted, allowing poorly conducted meetings is like permitting theft of valuable time from fellow managers. Rather than accepting bad meetings as inevitable, we need to apply scientific insights to transform them into productive experiences.

4장

The Leadership Blind Spot: Why Your Meetings Are Worse Than You Think

Perhaps the most troubling discovery in meeting science is that most leaders dramatically overestimate their meeting facilitation skills. This inflated self-perception creates a significant barrier to improvement-after all, why fix something you don't believe is broken? Without adequate assessment of meetings and leadership, these problems persist unchecked. Research by Green Peak Partners and Cornell found that high self-awareness was an exceptional predictor of executive success, as self-aware leaders do better at hiring and leveraging talent around them. To overcome this blind spot, leaders must regularly evaluate their meetings through surveys and feedback. Consider the example of an RSC Bio Solutions CEO who implemented daily fifteen-minute huddles with his commercial team, then assessed their effectiveness through a simple survey measuring usefulness and communication effectiveness. The survey revealed high satisfaction but also identified opportunities for improvement around focus and conciseness. Rather than immediately reducing frequency as some suggested, the CEO first implemented changes: creating additional discussion prompts, rotating leadership responsibilities, and setting clearer expectations. The ideal meeting leader embodies servant leadership principles, prioritizing others' needs over self-promotion. Unlike egocentric "leader-first" approaches focused on power accumulation, servant leaders share power and find satisfaction when others prosper. This leadership style, practiced at successful companies like SAS, Whole Foods, and Starbucks, aligns with Adam Grant's research on "givers" who assist others without expecting reciprocation. Servant-leader meeting facilitators recognize their responsibility to make meetings valuable for everyone, not just themselves. They carefully design meetings, create psychologically safe environments, and sometimes strategically limit their own contributions to encourage fuller participation. One leader restricted himself to just one or two sentences in certain meetings to prevent prematurely influencing discussions, resulting in richer, more inclusive conversations. Effective servant leaders excel at time management, active listening, conflict management, ensuring participation, and building consensus. They take pride in being excellent stewards of others' time, recognizing this approach leads to success for all involved. Research confirms that helping others is one of the most robust predictors of life satisfaction.

회의의 과학 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

5장

Breaking the Time Trap: Rethinking Meeting Duration

Cultural norms deeply influence how we conduct meetings, including the ubiquitous sixty-minute meeting length that has become standard across vastly different meeting purposes and contexts. This standardization ignores a fundamental principle known as Parkinson's law-work expands to fill the time available. First described in a 1955 essay in The Economist, Parkinson's law has been consistently confirmed by research across various populations, from college students to NASA scientists. When given excess time, people expend less effort and feel less urgency. This principle applies directly to meetings-if scheduled for sixty minutes, they generally take the full hour regardless of necessity. Meeting leaders should thoughtfully determine how much time is actually needed based on goals, attendees, and past meeting analysis. Scheduling unusual meeting lengths (like forty-eight minutes) can increase attention and reduce tardiness. Research supports reducing estimated meeting times by 5-10%, as the Yerkes-Dodson law shows that moderate stress improves performance. Google popularized the fifty/twenty-five rule (shortening hour meetings to fifty minutes and half-hour meetings to twenty-five), which provides transition time between meetings and reduces the 50% late-start rate that research shows leads to meeting frustration and decreased quality. Ten or fifteen-minute meetings, common in high-stakes environments like hospitals and emergency services, are gaining popularity in corporate settings. Companies like Percolate have made fifteen minutes their default meeting length, while former Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer famously scheduled ten-minute meetings that forced tight focus and allowed her to be highly responsive to employee needs. The "huddle"-a brief team gathering typically lasting 10-15 minutes-has been adopted by organizations from Apple to Zappos to the Obama White House. These daily team gatherings follow a consistent structure: same time, same place, perfect attendance (in person or remote), standing up when possible. Huddles typically address four key areas through focused questions: accomplishments and wins, daily priorities, key metrics, and obstacles. These brief meetings promote unity, coordination, accountability, problem-solving, and cross-team communication. While huddles are small time investments with big returns, two hazards must be avoided: creating more meeting time (instead, huddles should replace longer meetings) and not honoring the end time. Running over schedule breaks an implicit contract with attendees, causing stress and frustration. Many organizations take ending on time seriously-Google uses visible countdown timers, O3 World's "Roombot" technology dims lights as meetings near their end, while Tripping.com and Buddytruk use humorous penalties for running over.

6장

Beyond the Agenda: Strategic Meeting Design

Throughout history, traveling "merchants" have sold quick fixes promising to solve complex problems without requiring deep thought or hard work. Similarly, most meeting advice books and articles tout agendas as a cure-all solution. Unfortunately, relying on meeting agendas alone is exactly this kind of ineffective quick fix. Research shows agendas are minor predictors of meeting effectiveness, with some studies finding no positive relationship between written agendas and meeting quality. Many organizations simply recycle the same agenda from meeting to meeting, changing only the date. To be truly effective, agendas need strategic thought and preparation beyond just their existence. An agenda should be treated as an event plan, with careful consideration given to details, flow, and experience. With meetings often costing $1,000-$3,000 in attendee time and salaries, they warrant the same preparation as client meetings. As a meeting leader, you're a steward of others' time, so prepare internal meetings with the same focus as client events. Meetings should primarily address issues requiring genuine interaction and engagement, not just updates that could be handled through memos or webinars. Effective meetings should focus on interaction-requiring topics such as identifying risks and challenges, discussing key metrics, evaluating processes, solving important problems, celebrating victories, forecasting, and coordinating efforts. Beyond these leader-identified topics, agenda items should also come from attendees themselves. As Andy Grove noted, "The most important criterion governing matters to be talked about is that they be issues that preoccupy and nag the subordinate." Research shows that when employees have "voice" in work activities, they feel greater commitment and engagement. The order of agenda items significantly impacts meeting success. Research by Littlepage and Poole found that items early in the agenda receive disproportionate time and attention, regardless of importance. Therefore, simply listing items in the order received is counterproductive. Instead, rank agenda items by strategic importance, considering both immediate and long-term issues. Items with related content should be placed near each other to create a better "story." While meeting leaders maintain ultimate responsibility, strategically sharing leadership through agenda item "owners" increases accountability and follow-through. These owners facilitate discussion of their items and handle related post-meeting actions. Research confirms that publicly attaching names to tasks improves accountability. Apple formalized this practice with "DRIs" (directly responsible individuals) for agenda items. The final crucial step in agenda creation is determining not just what to cover but how to address each item. Meeting leaders should consider which tools and techniques best fit each agenda item based on the people involved, tasks at hand, history, and potential challenges.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

회의의 과학 요약의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

7장

The Attendance Dilemma: Finding the Right Size and Mix

Large, "bloated" meetings are common in organizations, with over 50% containing at least two unnecessary attendees. This happens due to inclusivity concerns, failure to analyze who's truly needed, and fear of political repercussions from excluding people. Despite theoretical benefits of more perspectives, research shows that large meetings are counterproductive. Bain & Company data shows each person over seven reduces decision effectiveness by approximately 10%. Another study found larger teams report poorer group experiences and more counterproductive behaviors including interpersonal aggression and resource misuse. Large meetings face coordination challenges and suffer from "social loafing"-the tendency to reduce effort when working collectively. In Ringelmann's tug-of-war experiments, individuals in dyads performed at 93% capacity, while those in eight-person groups dropped to 49%. Companies employ various approaches to limit meeting size. Percolate has a "no spectators" rule, while Apple follows Steve Jobs's intolerance of large meetings. Google advocates for no more than ten attendees, and Amazon uses the "two-pizza rule." Research suggests seven or fewer is ideal for decision-making, eight to twelve works with skilled facilitation, and fewer than fifteen is best for idea generation. While people complain about too many meetings, exclusion from meetings often creates feelings of marginalization and diminished organizational self-worth. Meeting leaders face a dilemma: large meetings lead to dysfunction, but excluding people can burn bridges. Five techniques help reduce meeting size while maintaining inclusion: (1) splitting agenda items into multiple smaller meetings; (2) using timed agendas where people enter and exit at specific times; (3) gathering input from non-attendees beforehand; (4) sharing detailed meeting notes with secondary stakeholders; and (5) assigning "representative voices" to speak for specific groups. Research shows people with explicit roles (like representing others) take their responsibilities more seriously. Excluding unnecessary attendees gives the gift of time to both those who don't attend and those who do, reducing frustration and saving company resources. However, since people dislike exclusion more than meetings themselves, using these techniques allows leaders to manage meeting size strategically without risking feelings of isolation.

8장

Breaking Habits: The Power of Meeting Environment

Humans are creatures of habit, with research showing roughly 45% of daily behaviors are repeated in the same location. This extends to meetings, where leaders engage in habitual behaviors-same time, same place, same seating arrangements. Breaking these patterns can create new energy and dynamics. Where you sit directly affects your meeting experience-influencing who you speak with, how much you participate, and even leadership dynamics. Research shows seating location affects communication flow and who we're likely to disagree with. People in "privileged" positions at the head or foot of the table typically communicate most, while those sitting adjacent are less likely to disagree with each other. Meeting leaders should encourage seating fluidity to prevent stagnation and promote different communication patterns. Simple solutions include shuffling name placards or changing meeting locations. Another technique is the "empty chair"-a physical cue representing customers or absent stakeholders, helping attendees consider alternative perspectives. Walking meetings, designed for 2-4 people, have been embraced by leaders like Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg, and Barack Obama. Research supports this practice: walking not only provides health benefits but increases energy, focus, and engagement. Stanford researchers found walking, especially outdoors, significantly boosts creativity-over 80% of participants were more creative walking than sitting. Walking meetings enhance communication by reducing multitasking, breaking down formalities, and encouraging more authentic conversation. They work best with small groups, minimal technology needs, and proper planning. The route should be relatively quiet and circular, with participants informed in advance to wear appropriate footwear. Standing meetings offer another alternative to traditional seated formats. Research shows standing meetings were 34% shorter than sitting meetings while maintaining the same quality, with participants reporting greater satisfaction. Studies from Washington University found standing meetings produced better collaboration, less possessiveness of ideas, more openness to others' suggestions, and higher engagement levels. These techniques are tools to energize meetings, promote focus, and improve the overall experience. They should be used sparingly, as overuse creates just another habit. Leveraging different approaches for different meeting goals is best practice. As William Cowper noted, "variety's the very spice of life that gives it all its flavor."

회의의 과학 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

9장

The Silence Solution: Rethinking Meeting Participation

Despite extensive preparation and talent, many corporate product failures like New Coke or McDonald's Arch Deluxe share a common problem: critical information never surfaced during decision-making meetings. The solution might be counterintuitive: less talking and more silence. Despite the hope that meetings will generate synergistic outcomes exceeding what could be achieved through one-on-one conversations, research shows this only happens 10-15% of the time. The key challenge is that attendees often fail to share unique, critical information, instead focusing on common knowledge that everyone already knows. Studies by Stasser and Titus demonstrate that groups typically base decisions on shared information rather than surfacing unique insights that could lead to optimal solutions. This happens because sharing common knowledge earns social approval, while unique perspectives may challenge the group's thinking. Brainwriting leverages strategic silence to generate and prioritize ideas more effectively than traditional brainstorming. Research shows brainwriting groups produce 20% more ideas and 42% more original ideas than traditional brainstorming. The process involves attendees silently writing ideas in response to a prompt, with contributions remaining anonymous. This approach eliminates production blocking (where only one person can speak at a time), reduces fear of social humiliation, and ensures all attendees must participate rather than hiding behind others' contributions. In simplified brainwriting with voting, attendees silently respond to a prompt tied to the meeting goal, with each idea on a separate sheet. A facilitator then sorts similar ideas into conceptual "buckets," which can be discussed or prioritized through voting. The entire process is inclusive, engaging, time-effective (often taking just one-third the time of traditional brainstorming), and free from conformity pressures. Another technique is silent reading of proposals during meetings. Amazon's Jeff Bezos pioneered this approach to evaluate ideas on their merits rather than presentation skills or social pressure. Meeting participants read thoroughly written proposals during the meeting itself-not in advance-ensuring everyone has done the preparation work. The silent reading period (10-30 minutes) is followed by vigorous discussion. Effective meeting leaders recognize they're orchestrating an experience when bringing people together. Most default to the conventional "simultaneous verbal interaction technique" (SVIT), but alternatives like brainwriting and silent reading represent essential options for different meeting goals. As Will Rogers said, "Never miss a good chance to shut up."

10장

Mastering Remote Meetings: Overcoming the Distance Challenge

Remote audio-only meetings present unique challenges that require different approaches. Despite technological advances, phone-based meetings remain common as people are often away from their desks. Paradoxically, employees dislike these meetings' effectiveness but prefer attending remotely to regain control through multitasking. This creates a perfect environment for social loafing-people reduce effort when anonymous, making minimal contributions while doing other work. Even motivated participants struggle with interruptions, communication flow problems, and misinterpretations without visual cues. Background noise and poor connections further undermine effectiveness. To improve remote meetings, first try encouraging video participation (WebEx, Google Hangout, Skype) to add visual cues that counteract communication problems and social loafing. When video isn't possible, additional facilitation techniques become necessary before, during, and after the meeting. Before remote meetings: Consider "banning" the mute button to discourage multitasking by asking participants to find quiet spaces; open the conference line early so participants can check connections before the official start time; and choose agenda items carefully, recognizing that meaningful discussion is harder without visual cues. During remote meetings: Use people's names frequently to maintain engagement and actively manage conversation flow. Draw remote attendees in by calling on them directly and keep a tally to ensure everyone contributes. Direct questions to specific individuals, especially remote participants when others are together in person. Have instant messaging available for attendees to signal when they want to speak. For larger remote teams, more substantive structural intervention becomes necessary. Keep phone meetings brief (around fifteen minutes) for communicating information and early-stage brainstorming. For decision-making, create small subteams (3-4 people) who discuss problems separately and select representatives. These representatives then meet with the leader to make final decisions-similar to representative democracy. Another effective approach is "using the intervals"-working between short meetings. First, hold a brief meeting (15 minutes) to outline a problem. Then use collaborative tools like Google Docs for asynchronous brainstorming. After a set period, have someone condense the document, then ask team members to vote on the best ideas. Hold a follow-up meeting (20 minutes) to discuss finalists, then conduct a final vote via online survey. Remote, audio-only meetings are the most difficult type to run effectively. However, they can work well if these techniques are applied. Many of these techniques-particularly using meeting intervals-can also be applied to improve in-person meetings.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

회의의 과학 요약의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

11장

Transforming Meeting Culture: A Practical Framework

Meetings are a foundational organizational characteristic that should never be accepted as poor by default. In the US alone, over a trillion dollars is spent on meetings annually, yet they're treated carelessly with little evaluation or drive to improve. Small positive changes-even improving just one meeting weekly-can lead to significant organizational gains and improved employee health and engagement. Taking just 5-15 minutes to visualize a meeting's flow, key needs, and challenges dramatically improves chances of success. Leaders can engage in a "premortem" exercise, imagining the meeting has failed and working backward to identify potential problems. Meeting decisions about time, agenda, attendees, and context should be purposeful rather than habitual. Remember Parkinson's law: work expands to fill the time allotted. Consider using odd meeting lengths or start times, or follow Google's approach of scheduling 50-55 minute meetings instead of full hours. A leader's mindset fundamentally shapes meeting success. The servant-leader approach focuses on making meetings valuable for all attendees rather than using meetings to demonstrate power or control. This mindset drives leaders to actively manage meeting dynamics: engaging all participants, asking meaningful questions, modeling active listening, drawing out input, directing traffic, and handling conflict. Since meetings often feel like interruptions, leaders should create positive energy from the start through music, enthusiastic greetings, or offering snacks. Begin with a purposeful opening statement and remind attendees of "meeting values." To maintain engagement, discourage multitasking and consider limiting device use. Keep meetings fresh by incorporating variety through clicker quizzes, role playing, partner discussions, and stretching breaks. Most leaders overestimate their meeting facilitation skills. Pay attention to warning signs: attendees checking phones, engaging in side conversations, reluctance to disagree, or your own domination of the discussion. Periodically evaluate your regular meetings through quick surveys asking what to stop, start, and continue doing. The solution to poor meetings isn't elimination but improvement. Meetings serve crucial purposes: building interpersonal connections, combining diverse perspectives, creating shared understanding, fostering commitment to broader goals, and bringing individuals together as a resilient whole. Approach meeting improvement as an experimental process: try new approaches, reflect on results, and continue learning. This not only enhances your meetings but demonstrates your willingness to innovate and take reasonable risks, helping build a culture of innovation. Your example may inspire others to improve their meetings, gradually transforming the organization's meeting culture.

★★★★★

회의의 과학 요약 완독을 축하합니다

“23일째 매일 사용하고 있어요. 이제 제 일상의 한 부분이 되었습니다.”

jayallen

회의의 과학 요약의 핵심 주제

meeting science
organizational efficiency
facilitation skills
time management
evidence-based management

회의의 과학 요약의 명문장

Meetings are easy targets for ridicule.
Meetings serve vital organizational functions.
Employees want meetings as part of their ideal workday.
Allowing poorly conducted meetings is like permitting theft.
Leaders overestimate their meeting facilitation skills.

회의의 과학 요약의 등장인물

Steven G. RogelbergAuthor and researcher of meeting science

저자 소개

조직 심리학자이자 뉴욕 타임스 베스트셀러인 *회의의 놀라운 과학: 팀을 최고의 성과로 이끄는 방법(The Surprising Science of Meetings: How You Can Lead Your Team to Peak Performance)*의 저자인 스티븐 G. 로겔버그(Steven G. Rogelberg)는 직장 내 회의 분야에서 세계 최고의 전문가로 인정받고 있습니다. 노스캐롤라이나 대학교 샬럿 캠퍼스(UNC Charlotte)의 챈슬러 석좌 교수인 로겔버그는 산업 및 조직 심리학 박사 학위와 수십 년간의 연구를 결합하여 팀 효율성과 조직 역학의 리더십 과제를 해결합니다. 그의 연구는 CBS 디스 모닝(CBS This Morning), NPR의 모닝 에디션(Morning Edition), 월스트리트 저널(Wall Street Journal) 등에 소개되었으며, 애덤 그랜트(Adam Grant)는 그를 "회의 개선 방법에 관한 세계 최고의 전문가"라고 칭송합니다.

로겔버그의 통찰력은 구글(Google) 및 아마존(Amazon)과 같은 포춘 500대 기업과의 컨설팅, 3,000개 조직에 서비스를 제공하는 비영리 지원 이니셔티브 지휘, 그리고 유엔(UN)과 런던 증권거래소에서 채택한 프레임워크 개척에서 비롯되었습니다. 그의 후속작인 *만나서 반가워요: 1:1 미팅의 예술과 과학(Glad We Met: The Art and Science of 1:1 Meetings)*은 관리 효율성을 위한 실질적인 전략을 더욱 확장하여 다룹니다.

회의의 놀라운 과학은 25개 이상의 "최고의 리더십 도서" 목록에 올랐으며, *워싱턴 포스트(Washington Post)*가 선정한 주목해야 할 리더십 도서 1위로 선정되었습니다. 평생 공로로 훔볼트 상(Humboldt Prize)을 수상한 로겔버그의 방법론은 전 세계 최고 경영자 과정(MBA)에서 교육되고 있으며 전 세계 경영진에 의해 실행되고 있습니다.

회의의 과학 요약 다운로드

회의의 과학 요약을 무료 PDF 또는 EPUB으로 받으세요. 인쇄하거나 오프라인에서 언제든 읽을 수 있습니다.

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

Glad We Met

Steven G. Rogelberg

Meetings That Get Results

Terrence Metz

Meetings That Get Results

Brian Tracy

Meetings Suck

Cameron Herold

Death by Meeting

Patrick M. Lencioni

Fixing Meetings

Graham Allcott and Hayley Watts

The Power of Full Engagement

Jim Loehr & Tony Schwartz

Science-Backed Secrets to Peak Productivity 책 표지

Evidence-Based Techniques to Boost Focus and Productivity

6 sources

Science-Backed Secrets to Peak Productivity

회의의 과학 요약에 관한 자주 묻는 질문

더 알아보기

학습 계획

The Psychology of High-Stakes Meetings

This plan is essential for leaders and professionals who must navigate intense corporate environments where every word carries weight. It provides the psychological tools needed to remain calm, read unspoken signals, and influence high-stakes decisions effectively.

1 h 12 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Run Meetings People Actually Want

In today’s corporate world, poorly managed meetings are a significant drain on productivity and morale. This plan is designed for leaders and project managers who want to stop wasting time and start driving real results through structured facilitation and accountability.

1 h 24 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Turn Dead Standups into High-Energy Huddles

Many teams struggle with repetitive, low-value meetings that drain morning energy rather than fueling it. This plan is designed for team leads and scrum masters looking to revitalize their daily rituals and drive faster delivery through better collaboration.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

The Science of Starting

This plan is essential for professionals and students who struggle with procrastination and the paralysis of starting new tasks. It provides a scientific approach to overcoming biological resistance and optimizing your digital environment for maximum output.

1 h 45 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Speak Up in Meetings Confi...

In today's collaborative workplace, the ability to speak up confidently in meetings directly impacts career advancement and idea implementation. This learning plan helps professionals who struggle with meeting anxiety or hesitate to share valuable insights transform into confident, influential contributors.

3 h 24 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Read the Room and Spot the Lie

This plan is essential for professionals who need to navigate high-stakes negotiations or lead complex teams. It benefits recruiters, managers, and investigators by merging neuroscience with practical behavioral analysis to ensure authentic communication.

1 h 45 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Spot hidden habits killing productivity

In an era of constant digital noise, traditional time management is no longer enough to stay effective. This plan is designed for professionals and students who feel busy but unproductive, offering the tools to reclaim focus and master cognitive energy.

3 h 16 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Neurobiology of Unstoppable Growth

This plan is essential for leaders and high-performers who want to leverage brain science to overcome burnout and stagnation. It bridges the gap between biological reality and professional excellence, making it ideal for anyone navigating high-pressure environments.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 제작 샌프란시스코에서 개발

BeFreed는 호기심 넘치는 글로벌 커뮤니티를 하나로 연결합니다

4.7

평균 평점

앱 평가 7.84천 개 이상

BeFreed Community

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 제작 샌프란시스코에서 개발

BeFreed는 호기심 넘치는 글로벌 커뮤니티를 하나로 연결합니다

4.7

평균 평점

앱 평가 7.84천 개 이상

BeFreed Community

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

지금 바로 학습 여정을 시작하세요

6장

회의의 과학 요약

회의의 과학 요약 개요

다양한 학습 방식으로 회의의 과학 요약 살펴보기

Meetings: The Hidden Productivity Killer We Love to Hate

The Meeting Epidemic: More Time, Less Productivity

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Meeting Paradox: Necessary Evil or Untapped Opportunity?

The Leadership Blind Spot: Why Your Meetings Are Worse Than You Think

회의의 과학 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Breaking the Time Trap: Rethinking Meeting Duration

Beyond the Agenda: Strategic Meeting Design

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Attendance Dilemma: Finding the Right Size and Mix

Breaking Habits: The Power of Meeting Environment

회의의 과학 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Silence Solution: Rethinking Meeting Participation

Mastering Remote Meetings: Overcoming the Distance Challenge

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Transforming Meeting Culture: A Practical Framework

회의의 과학 요약 완독을 축하합니다

회의의 과학 요약의 핵심 주제

회의의 과학 요약의 명문장

회의의 과학 요약의 등장인물

저자 소개

회의의 과학 요약 다운로드

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

회의의 과학 요약에 관한 자주 묻는 질문

What is The Surprising Science of Meetings by Steven G. Rogelberg about?

Who should read The Surprising Science of Meetings?

Is The Surprising Science of Meetings worth reading?

What are the key concepts in The Surprising Science of Meetings?

더 알아보기

BeFreed는 호기심 넘치는 글로벌 커뮤니티를 하나로 연결합니다

BeFreed는 호기심 넘치는 글로벌 커뮤니티를 하나로 연결합니다

다양한 학습 방식으로 회의의 과학 요약 살펴보기

Meetings: The Hidden Productivity Killer We Love to Hate

The Meeting Epidemic: More Time, Less Productivity

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Meeting Paradox: Necessary Evil or Untapped Opportunity?

The Leadership Blind Spot: Why Your Meetings Are Worse Than You Think

회의의 과학 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Breaking the Time Trap: Rethinking Meeting Duration

Beyond the Agenda: Strategic Meeting Design

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Attendance Dilemma: Finding the Right Size and Mix

Breaking Habits: The Power of Meeting Environment

회의의 과학 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Silence Solution: Rethinking Meeting Participation

Mastering Remote Meetings: Overcoming the Distance Challenge

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Transforming Meeting Culture: A Practical Framework

회의의 과학 요약 완독을 축하합니다

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

더 알아보기