What is *Thanks for the Feedback* by Douglas Stone about?

*Thanks for the Feedback* explores the challenges of receiving feedback and provides strategies to process evaluations, coaching, and criticism constructively. It combines neuroscience, psychology, and practical frameworks to help readers navigate feedback in professional and personal contexts, emphasizing the receiver’s role in interpreting and acting on input.

Who should read *Thanks for the Feedback*?

Professionals, managers, and individuals seeking to improve communication, leadership, or personal relationships will benefit. It’s particularly valuable for those in roles requiring frequent feedback exchanges (e.g., HR, coaching) or anyone struggling with defensiveness or misinterpretation of critiques.

Is *Thanks for the Feedback* worth reading?

Yes—it’s a New York Times bestseller praised for reshaping how feedback is received. The science-backed strategies and relatable examples make it essential for workplace dynamics, conflict resolution, and personal growth. Its focus on receiver education fills a gap missed by most feedback literature.

What are the three types of feedback described in the book?

The authors categorize feedback into: - **Appreciation** (motivational recognition) - **Coaching** (skill development) - **Evaluation** (performance assessment) Misalignment between the giver’s intent and receiver’s perception often causes conflict.

How does *Thanks for the Feedback* address emotional reactions to criticism?

It identifies three “feedback triggers”: 1. **Truth triggers** (disputing feedback’s accuracy) 2. **Relationship triggers** (distrusting the giver) 3. **Identity triggers** (threats to self-image) The book offers tools to separate emotions from insights.

What framework does the book recommend for receiving feedback effectively?

Key steps include: - Clarifying the feedback’s purpose (appreciation, coaching, or evaluation) - Distinguishing between “what happened” and “feelings” - Separating the feedback’s value from its delivery flaws

What is a key quote from *Thanks for the Feedback*?

“Feedback is not just what happens to you—it’s how you make sense of it.” This underscores the book’s thesis that receivers control how they interpret and act on input, even when poorly delivered.

How can *Thanks for the Feedback* help in workplace settings?

It provides tactics for managers to reduce defensiveness during reviews, helps teams normalize constructive criticism, and teaches employees to extract actionable insights from ambiguous feedback (e.g., “You need to be more proactive”).

피드백의 기술 요약

피드백을 잘 수용하는 과학과 기술

더글라스 스톤

4.06(9541 Reviews)

피드백의 기술 요약 개요

"대화의 심리학(Thanks for the Feedback)"에서 스톤(Stone)과 힌(Heen)은 우리가 비판을 수용하는 방식에 혁신을 일으켰습니다. 이 뉴욕타임스 베스트셀러는 기업 문화와 개인 관계를 모두 변화시켰습니다. 애덤 그랜트(Adam Grant)는 이 책을 "잠재적으로 인생을 바꿀 수 있는 책"이라고 평가했습니다. 더 큰 자기 인식과 더 강력한 관계를 원하는 모든 이들에게 이 책이 필독서가 된 것은 당연한 결과입니다.

전달 방식을 선택하세요

다양한 학습 방식으로 피드백의 기술 요약 살펴보기

피드백의 기술의 같은 아이디어를 담았습니다. 나에게 맞는 목소리, 깊이, 속도를 고르고 언제든 바꿔 보세요.

1장

The Art of Receiving Feedback: A Transformational Journey

Have you ever felt your heart race and defenses rise when someone offers you criticism? You're not alone. In a world where we receive constant assessment-from school grades to job reviews, dating apps to social media likes-feedback is unavoidable. Yet despite the 825 million work hours spent annually on performance reviews alone, most of us still struggle to hear what others have to say about us. Douglas Stone and Sheila Heen's groundbreaking work flips the traditional script by focusing not on how to give better feedback, but on how to receive it more effectively. The book has become a favorite among leaders at organizations like Google and the Gates Foundation, who recognize that the real leverage in feedback isn't in the giving-it's in the receiving. As Bill Gates himself noted, this approach transforms feedback from something we endure into fuel for growth and deeper relationships.

2장

Why Feedback Is So Hard: The Three Triggers

When someone offers feedback, our reaction often has little to do with the content and everything to do with how it triggers us emotionally. Understanding these triggers is the first step toward managing our responses and extracting value from even the most difficult feedback conversations. Truth triggers occur when we believe the feedback is simply wrong or unfair. "I don't micromanage!" we protest, certain the criticism misses the mark. This trigger stems from our conviction that the giver doesn't have their facts straight or doesn't understand the context. We become so focused on proving them wrong that we miss potential insights. Relationship triggers shift our focus from the feedback itself to the person delivering it. "Who are you to criticize my parenting when you don't even have kids?" The relationship becomes the issue, not the feedback. We question their credibility, motives, or timing, using these concerns to dismiss what might be valuable input. Identity triggers are perhaps the most destabilizing, as they threaten our very sense of who we are. When feedback suggests we're not as competent, caring, or ethical as we believe ourselves to be, it can send us into an emotional tailspin. "If I'm not good at this core aspect of my job, then who am I?" These triggers can leave us feeling overwhelmed, ashamed, or disoriented. What makes these triggers so challenging is that they operate below the surface of our awareness. We don't think, "I'm having an identity trigger right now." Instead, we simply feel the feedback is wrong, the giver is problematic, or we're suddenly questioning everything about ourselves. By recognizing these patterns, we gain the power to respond more productively. Consider Kip, who prided himself on being unbiased in hiring. When his colleague Nancy suggested he treated nontraditional candidates differently in interviews, his immediate reaction was dismissal-a classic truth trigger. Only by asking clarifying questions did he discover that his animated interviewing style actually gave these candidates less space to make their case, undermining his own intentions. His blind spot was revealed not because the feedback was wrong, but because he initially couldn't see what Nancy saw. The path to growth begins with recognizing which triggers are activated when we receive feedback. Only then can we move beyond our defensive reactions to engage with what might be valuable-even when it's painful to hear.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

피드백의 기술 요약의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

3장

The Three Types of Feedback: Appreciation, Coaching, and Evaluation

Not all feedback serves the same purpose, yet we often treat it as if it does. This confusion leads to crossed wires and missed opportunities. Understanding the distinct types of feedback helps us recognize what we're receiving and what we actually need. Appreciation says "I see you" and "you matter." It satisfies our fundamental human need for recognition and connection. When people complain about not getting enough feedback, they often mean they want more appreciation-acknowledgment that someone notices and values their efforts. Like a plant needs sunlight, we need appreciation to thrive. Without it, relationships develop what might be called "Mutual Appreciation Deficit Disorder," where both parties feel unrecognized and undervalued. Coaching aims to help you improve, grow, or change. It might address skill development ("here's how to analyze that market") or relationship issues ("when you interrupt me, I feel dismissed"). Coaching is future-focused and improvement-oriented. It assumes you can change and provides guidance on how to do so. Evaluation tells you where you stand against expectations or others. It provides assessment, ranking, or rating: "You're meeting expectations," "You're our top salesperson," or "Your performance is below standard." Evaluations align expectations, clarify consequences, and inform decisions. What makes them difficult is the layer of judgment that often accompanies the assessment. We need all three types, but problems arise when what we want doesn't match what we're given. Consider Donald, a law firm partner who misses the mark with three different employees: His assistant April wants appreciation for her long hours but gets coaching on time management; first-year lawyer Cody seeks coaching to improve but receives evaluation about his standing; and senior associate Evelyn needs clear evaluation about her partnership prospects but gets vague appreciation instead. Despite Donald's good intentions, everyone walks away frustrated. Another complication: all coaching contains implicit evaluation. When someone says, "Here's how you could improve your presentation skills," they're also suggesting "your current presentation skills aren't as good as they could be." This explains why the same baseball coaching from a father is received enthusiastically by one twin daughter while the other storms off in tears-one hears the helpful advice while the other hears only judgment. To avoid these misalignments, be explicit about the purpose of feedback conversations. When giving feedback, check in: "I'm intending to give coaching-is that what you need?" When receiving, be direct about what would help most: "I appreciate your coaching, but first I need to know if I'm doing all right overall." This simple clarification can transform feedback exchanges from frustrating to fulfilling.

4장

Understanding Before Judging: The Path to Better Feedback

When receiving feedback, our first instinct is to judge its validity-what's wrong with this feedback? Holly, a public defender, dismisses her supervisor Irwin's advice about getting "too enmeshed" with clients because she believes caring deeply is essential to her work. But this wrong-spotting tendency, while natural, defeats learning. The problem begins with how feedback arrives: in vague, generic labels like "be more proactive" or "maintain professional distance" that contain little actual content. When Irwin told Holly she was "too enmeshed," she assumed he meant she should care less. But he actually meant something specific: stop giving clients money and establish clearer boundaries to maintain professional credibility. Labels serve as general topic indicators but aren't the actual feedback. This misunderstanding happens because givers and receivers interpret labels differently. When givers use labels, they're seeing a detailed mental movie of the behavior they're describing, but receivers only hear vague words. This leads to mismatches, like when Nicholas interpreted his boss's advice to be "more assertive" as pushing customers aggressively, while she meant being more energetic and engaged. To understand feedback better, we must first learn to spot labels. Once identified, resist the temptation to fill in your own meaning. When someone says "be more affectionate," don't assume you know what they mean-it could be anything from holding hands in public to saying "I love you" more often. Feedback has both a past component ("here's what I noticed") and a future component ("here's what you need to do"). To clarify feedback, we need to understand both where it's coming from and where it's going. This means asking questions to uncover: 1. The specific observations that led to the feedback 2. How the giver interpreted those observations 3. What specific actions they're recommending 4. What consequences or expectations are attached Instead of using our own views to dismiss the giver's feedback as wrong (or vice versa), we need to understand why we see things differently. The shift moves from "that's wrong" to "tell me more-let's figure out why we see this differently." Two key factors explain these differences: we have different data, and we interpret that data differently. We observe different data because of our different roles, positions, experiences, and sensitivities. Even when exposed to the same environment, we notice different things based on our backgrounds and interests. Our biases also significantly influence what data we collect-when someone likes you, they'll actively notice your strengths and dismiss your mistakes as exceptions. When friction develops, the opposite happens. Even when looking at identical data, people can interpret it completely differently. When Janie complains that Ripley isn't helping keep the house clean, they're seeing the same messy house but interpreting it differently. Janie sees clutter as chaos and failure, feeling stretched too thin and ashamed. Ripley sees the same clutter as evidence of a rich family life bursting with energy and joy. By focusing on understanding rather than judgment, we transform feedback conversations from debates about who's right to explorations of how we see things differently. This shift doesn't require agreement, but it does require curiosity-and it's the foundation for extracting value from even the most challenging feedback.

피드백의 기술 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

5장

Blind Spots: What Others See That We Cannot

We all have blind spots-things obvious to others but invisible to us. Our behavior is largely invisible to us but clearly visible to others. Three key blind spots affect how we're perceived: our "leaky face" (facial expressions visible to everyone except ourselves), our "leaky tone" (voice tone that conveys meaning we don't hear ourselves), and our "leaky patterns" (recurring behaviors obvious to others but not to us). Our faces communicate tremendous information through expressions, yet we can't see our own faces in action. While humans evolved exceptional ability to read others' facial expressions-a skill developed over hundreds of thousands of years to distinguish friend from foe-we remain blind to our own expressions. Tone of voice conveys substantial emotional information beyond our words. While we focus on our thoughts and intentions when speaking, our superior temporal sulcus (STS)-the brain region that processes vocal emotion-actually turns off when we speak. This explains why we're often surprised by feedback about our tone and why our recorded voice sounds unfamiliar. Even major behavioral patterns can remain invisible to us while being obvious to others. Bennett discovers his family sees him as "always on his cell phone" despite his efforts to minimize phone time. Similarly, recurring relationship patterns that friends could chart from the beginning often remain completely invisible to us until someone points them out. Beyond these inherent blind spots, three dynamics widen the gap between self-perception and others' perception: emotional math (we discount certain emotions while others count them double), situation versus character attribution (we blame circumstances while others blame our character), and impact versus intent (we judge ourselves by intentions while others judge us by impacts). When something goes wrong, we attribute our actions to situational factors while others attribute them to our character. When we're late for a call, we explain it was because we were juggling multiple tasks (situation), while others conclude we're scatterbrained (character). The third amplifier highlights how we judge ourselves by our intentions while others judge us by our impacts. This creates a fundamental disconnect in perception-we know our good intentions but others only experience our impacts. Consider Annabelle, who intends to be respectful despite internal frustration with team members who ask questions she believes they should figure out themselves. Her colleagues experience only the negative impact of her leaked contempt through facial expressions, tone, and body language. These blind-spot amplifiers create a dramatically positive self-image. Consider this revealing statistic: 37% of Americans report being workplace bullying victims, yet fewer than 1% identify as bullies. This stark disparity suggests many "bullies" are unaware of their impact. They judge themselves by intentions ("just trying to get the job done right!") while attributing others' negative reactions to hypersensitivity or context. Simply trying harder to see ourselves clearly doesn't work. When we look inward, we typically conclude we don't have blind spots and the feedback must be wrong. Instead, we need help from others who can serve as honest mirrors. Ask specifically: "What do you see me doing, or failing to do, that is getting in my own way?" This signals your desire for honesty and focuses on impacts rather than intentions.

6장

Managing Relationship Triggers: Don't Switchtrack

When feedback triggers relationship issues, "switchtrack conversations" often result. In a scene from "Lucky Louie," Louie gives Kim red roses, she gives feedback that she doesn't like them and has told him so before, and they end up arguing. Though seemingly discussing the same topic (roses), they're actually on separate tracks: Kim is frustrated that Louie doesn't listen to her preferences, making her feel unimportant, while Louie is upset about feeling unappreciated for his gesture. This "switchtrack" dynamic involves four steps: getting feedback, experiencing a relationship trigger, changing the topic to our feelings, and talking past each other. Two key relationship triggers are: (1) what we think about the feedback giver, and (2) how we feel treated by them. We often dismiss feedback based on the giver's perceived lack of trust, credibility, or skill in delivery. The easiest target is how, when, and where feedback is offered: "Why would you say that in front of my fiance?" or "You waited until now to bring this up?" This creates a classic switchtrack where we debate the inappropriate delivery but never address the actual feedback. We also question if givers are trying to undermine us, control us, or just checking a box. We wonder if their praise is genuine or if they're saying something different behind our backs. The challenge is that intentions are invisible-locked in the giver's head where even they may not fully recognize them. Beyond what we think about feedback givers, we're also triggered by how they make us feel. Three key relationship interests commonly get snagged during feedback: our needs for appreciation, autonomy, and acceptance. We're triggered when feedback feels unbalanced against our positive contributions. Like a caretaker who's criticized for one moment of impatience after years of selfless care, or an employee who covers for a colleague only to be questioned about a minor oversight upon their return. Autonomy triggers flare when others appear to control aspects of our lives we consider our domain. Our boundaries often remain invisible until violated, when they suddenly crystallize. We're particularly sensitive about control over our attitudes, behaviors, personality, and self-expression. We struggle to take feedback from someone who doesn't seem to accept us as we are now. This creates a paradox: givers want us to change, while we want assurance it's okay if we don't. Complications arise when giver and receiver define acceptance differently-what seems like a small behavioral suggestion to one feels like a rejection of identity to the other. When relationship triggers cause reactions, the goal isn't to dismiss these issues but to recognize when two topics are on the table and address each on its merits rather than letting them become entangled. Three moves can help manage relationship triggers: 1. Spot the two topics (the original feedback and the relationship concern) 2. Give each topic its own conversation track through "signposting"-explicitly acknowledging the two separate topics 3. Listen for relationship issues lurking beneath "advice"-what sounds like tips for self-improvement might actually be expressing deeper feelings of frustration, loneliness, or worry By recognizing and managing relationship triggers, we can transform feedback conversations from frustrating switchtrack exchanges to productive discussions that address both the original feedback and the relationship concerns that arise.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

피드백의 기술 요약의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

7장

Understanding Relationship Systems: It's Not Just You or Me

When receiving feedback about a problem, we often face a fundamental question: who is responsible and who needs to change? While the feedback giver confidently identifies us as the source of the problem, we typically see things differently. A "system" is a set of interdependent components forming a complex whole, where each part influences others creating ripple effects. When problems occur in relationship systems, we each see only part of the problem-specifically what the other person contributes. Systems Insight Number One: Each person is part of the problem. Systems Insight Number Two: Each person sees only part of the problem (the other's contribution). To better understand relationship systems, we need to examine them from three different perspectives: One step back reveals how relationship problems often stem from the intersection of our differences, not just one person's behavior. Your need for weekend downtime conflicts with my need for engagement; your desire to empty Mom's house quickly clashes with my need to mourn. These differences create downward spirals of action and reaction, like Sandy and Gil's money conflicts where her comfort spending and his penny-pinching create mutual frustration. Two steps back shows how our roles significantly shape our interactions. "Accidental adversaries" emerge when role structures create chronic conflict, despite individuals' intentions. Role clashes arise from two sources: role confusion (unclear boundaries and responsibilities) and role clarity (inherent tensions between roles like compliance officers vs. traders, Sales vs. Legal). Three steps back includes not just the individuals involved but also other players, physical environment, timing, policies, and processes that influence behavior. When investigating workplace accidents, focusing solely on an injured worker's behavior misses the systemic factors-fatigue policies, equipment maintenance, safety training budgets, and performance incentives that contribute to the outcome. A systems perspective offers several advantages when processing feedback. It provides a more accurate picture of reality by combining multiple perspectives. It moves us away from needless judgment by helping us see conflicts as intersections of different styles rather than character flaws. And contrary to what some might fear, it enhances rather than diminishes accountability by clarifying the actual factors that caused problems. Systems thinking helps address two problematic feedback profiles: blame absorbers and blame shifters. Blame absorbers point fingers at themselves for everything, which not only creates emotional distress but obstructs learning by failing to explore the full system. Blame shifters deflect responsibility, attributing failures to external factors. While this might seem liberating, it's actually exhausting. These individuals feel constantly victimized by others' incompetence or treachery, powerless as life happens "at" them. When we don't understand the systemic nature of feedback, we often try adjusting just one component, expecting it to solve everything. Take Alice, who tells her direct report Benny to bring projects in on time and on budget, treating it as "a Benny Problem." What's unexplored is why Benny runs late-the board changing requirements, Vince failing to communicate changes promptly, and Alice not conveying clear parameters. Focusing on just one player in the system creates fixes that fail by solving short-term issues while creating long-term costs.

8장

Cultivating a Growth Identity: The Key to Learning from Feedback

Our ability to handle feedback depends not just on how we interpret it, but on how we hold our identity. Some people develop brittle identities that shatter under criticism, while others build robust ones that treat feedback as an integral part of who they are. The good news: we can learn to hold our identity in ways that make us more resilient by making two crucial shifts: giving up simple identity labels for complexity, and moving from a fixed mindset to a growth mindset. While simple identity labels like "I'm competent" or "I'm a good person" help orient us, they create an all-or-nothing dynamic. When feedback suggests we're not "all," we hear it as being "nothing." This makes feedback threatening-it can flip our identity switch from light to darkness. When all-or-nothing identities encounter negative feedback, we face a painful choice: either exaggerate the feedback (letting it become the headline of our identity story) or deny it completely. We often toggle between these extremes, finding no stable middle ground-accepting feedback means we're "bad," rejecting it means ignoring potentially valuable information. Simple labels can't capture the complexity of who we are. You might see yourself as "fair" or "trustworthy," but life presents situations that challenge these black-and-white self-definitions. A more nuanced self-story acknowledges both what you're proud of and where you fell short, allowing you to learn even from harsh criticism without being devastated by it. Accepting certain truths about ourselves creates a grounded foundation that makes feedback less destabilizing: you will make mistakes, you have complex intentions, and you have contributed to problems. Accepting that you will make mistakes takes pressure off and allows you to learn from feedback rather than reject it. Accepting that we have mixed intentions-that we sometimes cut corners, tell half-truths, and act in self-interest-can be an enormous relief. Once you've abandoned simple labels, consider another aspect of identity: Do you view your traits and abilities as fixed and finished, or as evolving and capable of growth? Stanford professor Carol Dweck discovered this crucial distinction by studying how children respond to challenging puzzles. With a fixed mindset, every challenge becomes a referendum on your abilities. When puzzles become difficult, fixed-mindset children hear them whispering: "Not enough puzzle smarts." Growth-mindset children see the same puzzles as coaches helping them improve. It's as if they're working in a "Learning Room" while fixed-mindset kids work in a "Testing Room." Our fixed or growth assumptions profoundly affect how we see ourselves, hear feedback, and respond to it. Growth-mindset individuals are remarkably accurate in gauging their abilities, while fixed-mindset people struggle with self-assessment. Research shows fixed-mindset students focus on whether they got answers right or wrong but lose interest in learning the correct answers. Growth-mindset students listen closely to both evaluation and coaching, hungry for information that helps them improve. To shift from fixed to growth assumptions, first become aware of your tendencies. Do you live in the Testing Room or the Learning Room? Do challenges threaten your identity or offer growth opportunities? Is failure the end or just another play in an ongoing game? Experiment with changing habits or improving skills, find a coach, and try things you aren't good at. When you fail, list ways to improve next time. After receiving negative feedback or rejection, give yourself a "second score" based on how you handle the first score. While the initial evaluation may not be fully in your control, your reaction to it usually is-and in the long term, this second score often matters more. Building a "second score" identity-"I don't always succeed, but I'm good at learning from failure"-helps you face challenging life events with resilience and grace.

★★★★★

피드백의 기술 요약 완독을 축하합니다

“23일째 매일 사용하고 있어요. 이제 제 일상의 한 부분이 되었습니다.”

jayallen

피드백의 기술 요약의 핵심 주제

receiving feedback
emotional triggers
blind spot awareness
performance evaluation
difficult conversations

피드백의 기술 요약의 명문장

Truth triggers occur when we believe the feedback is simply wrong or unfair.
Evaluation tells you where you stand against expectations or others.
Labels serve as general topic indicators but aren't the actual feedback.
We need all three types, but problems arise when what we want doesn't match what we're given.

피드백의 기술 요약의 등장인물

Douglas StoneCo-author and expert on receiving feedback
Sheila HeenCo-author and expert on receiving feedback
KipCase study regarding hiring bias and blind spots
DonaldLaw firm partner used as a case study

저자 소개

더글라스 스톤(Douglas Stone)은 베스트셀러인 *피드백의 기술(Thanks for the Feedback: The Science and Art of Receiving Feedback Well)*의 공동 저자이자 협상 및 커뮤니케이션 분야의 선도적인 전문가입니다. 하버드 법학대학원에서 약 30년 동안 강의해 온 스톤은 트라이어드 컨설팅 그룹(Triad Consulting Group)을 공동 설립하여 구글, 애플, 미국 국무부와 같은 조직에 중대한 대화에 관한 자문을 제공하고 있습니다. 그의 작업은 실질적인 전략과 심리학적 통찰력을 결합하여 직장 내 역동성과 개인적 관계를 개선하는 데 중점을 둡니다.

스톤은 기업 교육과 학계 커리큘럼에서 널리 활용되는 뉴욕 타임스 베스트셀러, *어려운 대화(Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most)*를 공동 집필했습니다. 그의 프레임워크는 경영자 교육 프로그램에서 교육되고 있으며, 매사추세츠 주 대법원부터 글로벌 NGO에 이르기까지 다양한 기관에서 시행되고 있습니다.

복잡한 대인 관계의 문제를 실행 가능한 도구로 변환하는 것으로 잘 알려진 스톤의 방법론은 공감, 명확성, 그리고 협력적 문제 해결을 강조합니다. 피드백의 기술은 전 세계 리더십 개발 프로그램에 통합되어 전문가들이 비판을 수용하고 성장을 도모하는 데 도움을 주고 있습니다. 이 책은 업계 리더들의 지지를 받았으며 교육에서 의료에 이르기까지 다양한 분야에서 필독서로 인용되고 있습니다.

피드백의 기술 요약 다운로드

피드백의 기술 요약을 무료 PDF 또는 EPUB으로 받으세요. 인쇄하거나 오프라인에서 언제든 읽을 수 있습니다.

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

Feedback

M. Tamra Chandler and Laura Dowling Grealish

Difficult Conversations

Douglas Stone

Let's Talk

Therese Huston

Critical Feedback: The Art of Clarity 책 표지

C.O.R.E. Framework for Defensive Feedback | Eamon Blackthorn

S.B.I. Method for Difficult Feedback | Eamon Blackthorn

How to Give Constructive Criticism (Without the Sandwich) | QuestWorks

5 sources

Critical Feedback: The Art of Clarity

Overcoming Your Fear of Giving Tough Feedback

Tips for Giving Feedback & Avoiding Feedback Mistakes | CCL

The High-Wire Act: Giving Feedback to Your High-Performers Without Crushing Trust

The Hidden Psychology Behind Your Most Frustrating Coaching Conversations

6 sources

Hard Feedback: The Gift of Growth

Feedback model in 7 steps | Fit for Feedback

Radical Candor Framework for Manager Feedback | Cabinet

Use Situation-Behavior-Impact (SBI)™ To Understand Intent - CCL.org

9 sources

How to Give Feedback That Lands

Why The Feedback Sandwich Is Ineffective & What to Do Instead

"Giving Feedback Without Creating Defensiveness"

5 sources

How to Give Feedback That Lands

Feedback Without Being a Pushover: Overbearing Boss Edition 책 표지

Responding to Feedback You Disagree With

How to Raise a Difficult Issue in a One-on-One with Your Boss

6 sources

Feedback Without Being a Pushover: Overbearing Boss Edition

피드백의 기술 요약에 관한 자주 묻는 질문

이 학습 계획의 일부

학습 계획

Accept criticism without becoming defensive

3 h 23 m•4 에피소드

더 알아보기

학습 계획

Give formative feedback as a manager in work

Effective feedback is the cornerstone of high-performing teams, yet many managers struggle to move beyond basic criticism. This learning plan is essential for leaders who want to transition from traditional management to a coaching-led approach that fosters long-term employee development and psychological safety.

5 h 52 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Accept criticism without becoming defensive

The ability to receive criticism constructively is essential for professional advancement and personal growth. This learning plan helps anyone who struggles with defensive reactions to feedback develop healthier responses that transform criticism from a threat into a valuable resource.

3 h 23 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Radical Self-Worth Blueprint

This blueprint is essential for high-achievers who struggle with chronic self-criticism and burnout. It provides a structured path to decouple identity from output, benefiting anyone seeking a more resilient and compassionate relationship with themselves.

1 h 12 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Thinking, Fast and Slow: Decision Toolkit

In an era of information overload, understanding the mechanics of human judgment is a critical superpower for leaders and professionals. This toolkit is essential for anyone looking to minimize cognitive errors and master the psychological drivers behind every choice we make.

3 h 15 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Power of TED* for Leaders

This learning plan is essential for leaders feeling drained by constant workplace drama and reactive problem-solving. It provides a practical framework to shift team dynamics from conflict-heavy interactions to empowering, creator-led collaboration.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Kritik als Wachstumschance nutzen

Dieser Lernplan ist ideal für Fach- und Führungskräfte, die Feedback nicht mehr als Bedrohung, sondern als Hebel für Erfolg sehen wollen. Er vermittelt psychologisches Wissen und praktische Methoden, um in kritischen Situationen gelassen und konstruktiv zu bleiben.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

The Science of Self-Awareness

This plan bridges the gap between neuroscience and practical decision-making for leaders and high-performers. It is ideal for anyone looking to master their internal biology and break through the mental glass ceilings that hinder professional progress.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

The Science of Human Connection

In an era of digital disconnect, understanding the biological and psychological roots of interaction is essential for meaningful success. This plan is designed for professionals and leaders who want to master non-verbal cues and conflict resolution to build stronger, more resilient bonds.

1 h 36 m•4 섹션

컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 제작 | 샌프란시스코에서 개발

BeFreed는 호기심 넘치는 글로벌 커뮤니티를 하나로 연결합니다

4.7

평균 평점

앱 평가 7.84천 개 이상

BeFreed 커뮤니티

정말이지 아직 앱을 다 써 보지도 않았는데, 며칠 써 본 것만으로도 깊은 인상을 받았어요… BeFreed는 제가 써 본 어떤 학습 앱과도 차원이 달라요. 몰입감이 엄청나고 집중력도 실제로 좋아져서, 스마트폰을 하염없이 스크롤하는 분들께 딱이에요!

@ladyInfinity

정확히 23일 전에 BeFreed를 구입했는데, 그날부터 하루도 빠짐없이 쓰고 있어요. 제 일상 업무 흐름과 학습 습관에 완전히 자리 잡았어요.

@jayallen

솔직히 이 앱은 제 기대를 전부 뛰어넘었어요. 어떤 주제든 오디오로 만들어 달라고 할 수 있고, 결과물이 놀라워요. 제 전문 분야는 심리치료 쪽이고 여러 학문이 얽혀 있는데도 답변이 아주 정확해요.

@Raguipa

제일 고마운 건 스크롤하는 시간이 확 줄었다는 거예요. 검색하는 시간은 줄고 흡수하는 시간은 늘었어요. 오디오북 전권, 팟캐스트, 학습 플랜의 조합이 정말 훌륭해요.

@colonyofcreatorsNGO

저는 24년째 PhotoReading 속진 학습 강사로 일하고 있어요… 책과 독서, 배움이 제 전문인데, BeFreed는 정보를 소화하기 쉽게 전달하는 혁신적인 방식을 정말 잘 구현했어요.

@BeFreed user

단순한 책 요약 앱이 아니에요. '재미' 스타일을 써 봤는데, 전통적인 방식보다 훨씬 나은 요약이고 아이디어를 이해하기도 쉬워요. 이것만으로도 값어치를 해요.

@austinakon

이 앱이 정말 좋아요. 며칠 써 봤는데 듣는 걸 멈출 수가 없어요. 시작하기에 이보다 좋을 수 없어요.

@jcrules328

정말 마음에 들어요. 한 달 정도 써 봤는데 숨은 보석을 찾은 기분이에요. BeFreed로 제가 원하는 주제를 직접 만들 수 있어서 좋고, 목소리도 훌륭한 데다 내레이션 선택지가 무궁무진해요.

@DanielCZ

정말이지 아직 앱을 다 써 보지도 않았는데, 며칠 써 본 것만으로도 깊은 인상을 받았어요… BeFreed는 제가 써 본 어떤 학습 앱과도 차원이 달라요. 몰입감이 엄청나고 집중력도 실제로 좋아져서, 스마트폰을 하염없이 스크롤하는 분들께 딱이에요!

@ladyInfinity

정확히 23일 전에 BeFreed를 구입했는데, 그날부터 하루도 빠짐없이 쓰고 있어요. 제 일상 업무 흐름과 학습 습관에 완전히 자리 잡았어요.

@jayallen

솔직히 이 앱은 제 기대를 전부 뛰어넘었어요. 어떤 주제든 오디오로 만들어 달라고 할 수 있고, 결과물이 놀라워요. 제 전문 분야는 심리치료 쪽이고 여러 학문이 얽혀 있는데도 답변이 아주 정확해요.

@Raguipa

제일 고마운 건 스크롤하는 시간이 확 줄었다는 거예요. 검색하는 시간은 줄고 흡수하는 시간은 늘었어요. 오디오북 전권, 팟캐스트, 학습 플랜의 조합이 정말 훌륭해요.

@colonyofcreatorsNGO

저는 24년째 PhotoReading 속진 학습 강사로 일하고 있어요… 책과 독서, 배움이 제 전문인데, BeFreed는 정보를 소화하기 쉽게 전달하는 혁신적인 방식을 정말 잘 구현했어요.

@BeFreed user

단순한 책 요약 앱이 아니에요. '재미' 스타일을 써 봤는데, 전통적인 방식보다 훨씬 나은 요약이고 아이디어를 이해하기도 쉬워요. 이것만으로도 값어치를 해요.

@austinakon

이 앱이 정말 좋아요. 며칠 써 봤는데 듣는 걸 멈출 수가 없어요. 시작하기에 이보다 좋을 수 없어요.

@jcrules328

정말 마음에 들어요. 한 달 정도 써 봤는데 숨은 보석을 찾은 기분이에요. BeFreed로 제가 원하는 주제를 직접 만들 수 있어서 좋고, 목소리도 훌륭한 데다 내레이션 선택지가 무궁무진해요.

@DanielCZ

유용한 정보와 아이디어를 8~15분짜리 팟캐스트 스타일 오디오로 압축해서 들을 수 있다는 게 정말 좋아요. 원래 팟캐스트는 군더더기가 많아서 안 좋아했는데, 여기는 그걸 싹 걷어냈어요.

@BeFreed user

박사 과정을 마무리하는 중이라 낯선 자료를 많이 읽어야 해요… BeFreed에서는 프롬프트만 입력하면 앱이 자료를 찾아서 오디오 팟캐스트로 만들어 줘요. BeFreed의 과정이 NotebookLM보다 더 매끄럽게 느껴져요.

@Brad

아침을 준비하거나 산책하거나 출퇴근할 때 들을 것을 YouTube에서 자주 찾곤 했는데, BeFreed는 광고도 군더더기도 없이 훨씬 더 딱 맞는 걸 들려줘요!

@BeFreed user

이 플랫폼의 가장 큰 장점은 활용도예요. 다루지 못하는 주제가 말 그대로 하나도 없어요. 무엇을 던져도 다 소화해요… 제한이 전혀 없으면서 약속을 실제로 지키는 학습 도구는 정말 드물어요.

@jayallen

BeFreed는 환상적이에요. 디자인이 편해서 헤매는 시간은 줄고 배우는 시간은 늘었어요. 오디오북, 팟캐스트, 학습 플랜의 조합은 천재적이에요. 제 하루가 완전히 달라졌어요.

@BeFreed user

처음엔 이탈리아어로 팟캐스트를 만드는 방법을 이해하는 데 시간이 좀 걸렸는데, 알고 나니까 — 와! 정말 대단해요! 어떤 주제든 설명해 달라고 하면 정말 똑똑하게 잘 설명해 줘요!

@matteo77

BeFreed는 제가 매일 쓰는 오디오북 앱이 됐어요… 제일 마음에 드는 건 텍스트를 넣으면 이동 중에도 들을 수 있는 오디오로 만들어 준다는 점이에요.

@kotanzu1

유용한 정보와 아이디어를 8~15분짜리 팟캐스트 스타일 오디오로 압축해서 들을 수 있다는 게 정말 좋아요. 원래 팟캐스트는 군더더기가 많아서 안 좋아했는데, 여기는 그걸 싹 걷어냈어요.

@BeFreed user

박사 과정을 마무리하는 중이라 낯선 자료를 많이 읽어야 해요… BeFreed에서는 프롬프트만 입력하면 앱이 자료를 찾아서 오디오 팟캐스트로 만들어 줘요. BeFreed의 과정이 NotebookLM보다 더 매끄럽게 느껴져요.

@Brad

아침을 준비하거나 산책하거나 출퇴근할 때 들을 것을 YouTube에서 자주 찾곤 했는데, BeFreed는 광고도 군더더기도 없이 훨씬 더 딱 맞는 걸 들려줘요!

@BeFreed user

이 플랫폼의 가장 큰 장점은 활용도예요. 다루지 못하는 주제가 말 그대로 하나도 없어요. 무엇을 던져도 다 소화해요… 제한이 전혀 없으면서 약속을 실제로 지키는 학습 도구는 정말 드물어요.

@jayallen

BeFreed는 환상적이에요. 디자인이 편해서 헤매는 시간은 줄고 배우는 시간은 늘었어요. 오디오북, 팟캐스트, 학습 플랜의 조합은 천재적이에요. 제 하루가 완전히 달라졌어요.

@BeFreed user

처음엔 이탈리아어로 팟캐스트를 만드는 방법을 이해하는 데 시간이 좀 걸렸는데, 알고 나니까 — 와! 정말 대단해요! 어떤 주제든 설명해 달라고 하면 정말 똑똑하게 잘 설명해 줘요!

@matteo77

BeFreed는 제가 매일 쓰는 오디오북 앱이 됐어요… 제일 마음에 드는 건 텍스트를 넣으면 이동 중에도 들을 수 있는 오디오로 만들어 준다는 점이에요.

@kotanzu1

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

지금 바로 학습 여정을 시작하세요

8장

피드백의 기술 요약

피드백의 기술 요약 개요

다양한 학습 방식으로 피드백의 기술 요약 살펴보기

The Art of Receiving Feedback: A Transformational Journey

Why Feedback Is So Hard: The Three Triggers

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Three Types of Feedback: Appreciation, Coaching, and Evaluation

Understanding Before Judging: The Path to Better Feedback

피드백의 기술 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Blind Spots: What Others See That We Cannot

Managing Relationship Triggers: Don't Switchtrack

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Understanding Relationship Systems: It's Not Just You or Me

Cultivating a Growth Identity: The Key to Learning from Feedback

피드백의 기술 요약 완독을 축하합니다

피드백의 기술 요약의 핵심 주제

피드백의 기술 요약의 명문장

피드백의 기술 요약의 등장인물

저자 소개

피드백의 기술 요약 다운로드

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

피드백의 기술 요약에 관한 자주 묻는 질문

What is Thanks for the Feedback by Douglas Stone about?

Who should read Thanks for the Feedback?

Is Thanks for the Feedback worth reading?

What are the three types of feedback described in the book?

이 학습 계획의 일부

Accept criticism without becoming defensive

더 알아보기

BeFreed는 호기심 넘치는 글로벌 커뮤니티를 하나로 연결합니다

다양한 학습 방식으로 피드백의 기술 요약 살펴보기

The Art of Receiving Feedback: A Transformational Journey

Why Feedback Is So Hard: The Three Triggers

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Three Types of Feedback: Appreciation, Coaching, and Evaluation

Understanding Before Judging: The Path to Better Feedback

피드백의 기술 요약에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Blind Spots: What Others See That We Cannot

Managing Relationship Triggers: Don't Switchtrack

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Understanding Relationship Systems: It's Not Just You or Me

Cultivating a Growth Identity: The Key to Learning from Feedback

피드백의 기술 요약 완독을 축하합니다

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

이 학습 계획의 일부

Accept criticism without becoming defensive

더 알아보기