Who should read *Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code*?

This book is essential for **software developers** at all levels. Beginners learn foundational practices like identifying code smells and writing tests, while experienced engineers gain systematic strategies to improve legacy systems. Managers and architects also benefit from understanding refactoring’s role in agile workflows and technical debt reduction.

Is *Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code* worth reading in 2024?

Yes. Despite its 2018 update, the principles remain timeless. The second edition’s shift to **JavaScript examples** broadens relevance, and concepts like **behavior-preserving transformations** apply to any language. Fowler’s methodology is widely adopted in modern DevOps and CI/CD pipelines, making it a cornerstone of professional software craftsmanship.

What are the key code smells discussed in *Refactoring*?

Fowler identifies **24 code smells**, including: - **Data Clumps**: Groups of variables passed together unnecessarily (fix with *Introduce Parameter Object*). - **Primitive Obsession**: Overusing basic data types instead of objects (address via *Replace Primitive with Object*). - **Long Methods**: Overly complex functions requiring decomposition.

How does *Refactoring* approach the "Rule of Three"?

Fowler advocates Don Roberts’ **Rule of Three**: Refactor only when duplication occurs three times. This balances over-engineering with technical debt, encouraging pragmatic design adjustments. For example, repeated validation logic might trigger *Extract Method* refactoring.

What changes were made in the second edition of *Refactoring*?

The 2018 update replaces Java with **JavaScript examples**, reflecting modern language trends. It also streamlines the refactoring catalog, adds new code smells, and integrates insights from automated tools like ESLint. Despite fewer pages, it retains core principles while enhancing accessibility for newer developers.

How does testing relate to refactoring, according to Fowler?

Fowler asserts that **comprehensive tests** are prerequisites for safe refactoring. Techniques like *Test-Driven Development (TDD)* ensure behavior preservation during code changes. The book provides strategies for retrofitting tests into legacy systems, reducing risks when modernizing untested codebases.

What is the "catalog of refactorings" in *Refactoring*?

The catalog details **72 refactorings**, categorized into: - **Core techniques** (e.g., *Rename Variable*). - **Encapsulation** (e.g., *Hide Delegate*). - **Simplifying conditionals** (e.g., *Decompose Conditional*). Each entry includes mechanics, motivation, and examples, serving as a reference for incremental code improvements.

리팩터링

Q: What is *Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code* about?

*Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code* by Martin Fowler is a definitive guide to restructuring code without altering its functionality. It introduces over 70 refactoring techniques, such as **Extract Method** and **Replace Conditional with Polymorphism**, to eliminate "code smells" like duplicated logic or overly complex classes. The book emphasizes small, incremental changes to enhance readability, maintainability, and scalability of software systems.

기존 코드의 디자인 개선하기

마틴 파울러

4.24(8775 Reviews)

Technology

리팩터링 개요

마틴 파울러(Martin Fowler)의 "리팩터링(Refactoring)"은 개발자들에게 기능의 변경 없이 코드를 개선하는 방법을 가르침으로써 코딩 관행에 혁명을 일으켰습니다. 애자일의 선구자 켄트 벡(Kent Beck)이 보증한 이 업계의 성서는 거대 IT 기업들이 소프트웨어 유지보수에 접근하는 방식을 변화시켰으며, "클린 코드"를 하나의 신조로 만든 바로 그 책입니다.

전달 방식을 선택하세요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

리팩터링의 같은 아이디어를 담았습니다. 나에게 맞는 목소리, 깊이, 속도를 고르고 언제든 바꿔 보세요.

1장

The Art of Sustainable Code: Refactoring as a Design Superpower

In a world where software projects often collapse under their own complexity, Martin Fowler's "Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code" stands as a timeless guide to keeping codebases healthy and maintainable. First published in 1999 and updated in 2018, this book has become required reading for developers who care about craftsmanship. Tech leaders like Kent Beck (creator of Extreme Programming) consider Fowler's refactoring techniques essential, while companies from Google to Spotify incorporate these practices into their engineering culture. What makes this book particularly powerful is how it transforms what many consider a mundane maintenance task into a proactive design activity that actually accelerates development. As software continues eating the world, the ability to evolve code without breaking it has never been more valuable.

2장

Why Refactoring Matters: The Economics of Clean Code

Refactoring isn't about making code "pretty" - it's about economics and sustainable development. The most counterintuitive insight Fowler shares is that regular refactoring actually makes development faster, not slower. When managers worry that developers are "wasting time" cleaning up working code, they miss the bigger picture of long-term productivity and maintenance costs. Think of code like a kitchen. If you cook meals without cleaning up, you'll initially move faster. But eventually, the accumulated mess will slow you down dramatically. You'll spend more time searching for ingredients, working around clutter, and fixing mistakes. In software, this manifests as developers spending hours tracking down bugs in convoluted code, struggling to add features without breaking existing functionality, and repeatedly explaining complex workarounds to new team members. Fowler explains this through his "Design Stamina Hypothesis." Initially, poor design lets you move quickly because you're not investing time in architecture and clean code. But that advantage disappears as the system grows. Good design maintained through regular refactoring creates "development stamina" that sustains productivity over the long term. This becomes particularly evident in large-scale systems where small inefficiencies multiply across millions of lines of code. Real-world examples validate this approach. When Fowler consulted for a troubled financial services project, he found programmers struggling with a messy class hierarchy that had grown organically over three years. After just two days of focused refactoring, they removed half the code without reducing functionality by consolidating duplicate methods and simplifying inheritance patterns. Six months later, the original project failed because the code was too complex to debug or tune performance issues. The restarted project, which embraced continuous refactoring, succeeded and delivered better performance with less maintenance overhead. The economics become even clearer when you consider that developers spend up to 70% of their time reading code rather than writing it. Well-refactored code communicates its intent clearly through meaningful variable names, logical organization, and consistent patterns. This makes it faster to understand and modify, reducing the cognitive load on developers. As Fowler memorably puts it, "Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand." The financial impact extends beyond developer productivity. Refactored code is typically more efficient, uses less memory, and runs faster because it eliminates redundancy and streamlines operations. It's also easier to test, reducing the number of bugs that reach production and their associated costs. Companies like Amazon and Google mandate regular refactoring as part of their development process precisely because they've measured these economic benefits.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

리팩터링의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

3장

The Refactoring Process: Small Steps, Big Impact

What separates true refactoring from general code cleanup is its disciplined approach. Fowler defines refactoring as "a change made to the internal structure of software to make it easier to understand and cheaper to modify without changing its observable behavior." This definition emphasizes that refactoring is about improving design while preserving functionality, not fixing bugs or adding features. The key insight is that refactoring happens in tiny, behavior-preserving steps, each followed by running tests to ensure nothing broke. This rhythm - make a small change, test, commit - is fundamental. While it might seem inefficient to work in such small increments, this approach ensures you never leave the code in a broken state. For example, when extracting a method, you might first identify the code to extract, create the new method, move the code, adjust any necessary variables, and test after each step rather than doing it all at once. Fowler demonstrates this through a theatrical billing system example. Rather than making sweeping changes, he methodically improves the code: extracting functions with meaningful names (like calculatePerformanceCharge instead of amountFor), replacing temporary variables with queries (turning price calculations into dedicated methods), introducing polymorphism for different play types (creating separate classes for comedies and tragedies). Each step is small, but the cumulative effect transforms tangled code into a clear, maintainable design. The example shows how even complex refactorings can be broken down into safe, manageable steps. This incremental approach addresses the biggest risk of changing existing code: introducing bugs. By taking small steps and testing after each one, refactoring becomes remarkably safe. As Kent Beck describes it, this is the difference between being "a great programmer" and "a good programmer with great habits." The discipline of small steps creates a safety net that allows bold structural changes to be made confidently. The process also includes knowing when to refactor. Fowler identifies several prime opportunities: just before adding a feature (to make implementation easier), during code comprehension (to capture your understanding), and during code reviews (to immediately implement improvements rather than just suggesting them). He also introduces the concept of "preparatory refactoring" - improving the code's design before adding new functionality - and "comprehension refactoring" where you refactor code to verify and document your understanding of how it works. Common triggers for refactoring include duplicate code, long methods (over 10 lines), large classes (too many responsibilities), feature envy (a method more interested in another class's data), and primitive obsession (overuse of primitive data types instead of small objects). Recognizing these code smells and addressing them promptly prevents technical debt from accumulating. The refactoring process is supported by modern development tools that automate many common refactorings, reducing the risk of manual errors. IDEs can safely rename variables, extract methods, and move classes, making it easier to maintain the small-steps discipline that characterizes effective refactoring.

4장

Code Smells: Recognizing Problems Worth Solving

One of the book's most valuable contributions is the concept of "code smells" - patterns that signal potential problems in code. Co-authored with Kent Beck, this catalog helps developers identify when and where to refactor, providing a systematic approach to improving code quality without relying on mere instinct. Rather than relying on rigid metrics like cyclomatic complexity or line counts, code smells develop a programmer's intuition about problematic patterns. For instance, "Mysterious Name" indicates functions or variables with unclear purposes, such as methods named "process()" or variables called "data." "Shotgun Surgery" describes when a single change requires modifications across many different classes - a common issue when dealing with cross-cutting concerns like logging or security. Some smells are particularly insidious and require careful attention. "Feature Envy" occurs when a function in one module seems more interested in another module's data than its own - a sign it might belong elsewhere. For example, if an Order class constantly queries Customer details, those operations might better belong in the Customer class. "Primitive Obsession" reveals our tendency to use basic types (like strings and integers) when a proper object would better represent the domain concept - such as using a string for a phone number instead of creating a dedicated PhoneNumber class with validation and formatting. Fowler's perspective on comments is particularly thought-provoking. Rather than viewing them as universally good, he considers them a "smell" - not because documentation is bad, but because comments often compensate for unclear code. When you feel the need to write a comment explaining what the code does, first try refactoring the code to make it self-explanatory. For instance, instead of commenting "calculate total with tax," create a method called calculateTotalWithTax(). The book identifies several other notable smells: "Long Method" suggests breaking down complex operations into smaller, focused pieces; "Duplicate Code" indicates a violation of DRY principles; and "Large Class" suggests a class might be trying to do too much, violating single responsibility principles. Each smell comes with specific refactoring techniques to address the underlying issues. These smells aren't absolute rules but heuristics that guide attention to areas worth improving. By learning to recognize them, developers gain a vocabulary for discussing code quality and prioritizing improvements. The smells serve as warning signs, helping teams identify technical debt before it becomes overwhelming and providing a common language for code review discussions. Moreover, Fowler emphasizes that context matters - what's considered a smell in one situation might be acceptable in another. The key is understanding not just the patterns themselves, but when and why they become problematic in your specific codebase.

리팩터링에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

5장

The Power of Good Names: Communication Through Code

Throughout the book, Fowler emphasizes the critical importance of naming. "Good programming is all about how you name things," he explains, noting that finding the right names is one of programming's two hardest challenges (alongside cache invalidation and off-by-one errors). This observation resonates particularly in large codebases where developers spend far more time reading code than writing it. Refactorings like Rename Variable, Rename Function, and Extract Function all serve to improve how code communicates its intent. When a function is named after what it does rather than how it does it, readers can understand its purpose without examining its implementation. For example, rather than naming a function "iterateArrayAndSum," a better name might be "calculateTotalRevenue" if that's its business purpose. Similarly, variable names like "data" or "info" should be replaced with specific descriptors like "customerTransactions" or "monthlyExpenses." This focus on naming reflects a deeper philosophy: code is primarily a communication medium between humans, not just instructions for computers. Fowler admits to being "lazy" about remembering code details, deliberately putting everything important into the code itself through clear naming and structure. He advocates for self-documenting code where the names of classes, methods, and variables tell a coherent story about the system's behavior. The book offers practical guidance on this communication challenge. For instance, when extracting a function, name it after its intention rather than implementation. Even if a function name becomes longer than its body (like Smalltalk's "highlight" method that simply calls "reverse"), the clarity gained through naming justifies the extraction. Fowler provides numerous examples: "calculateAgeInYears" is better than "ageCalc," "isEligibleForDiscount" trumps "checkFlag," and "processPaymentTransaction" is clearer than "doPayment." This approach transforms code from a technical artifact into a form of communication, where each name tells a story about the program's purpose and structure. Good names act as documentation that stays synchronized with the code, unlike separate documentation that can become outdated. Fowler suggests several naming patterns: using verb phrases for methods that perform actions (validateCustomer, calculateTotal), noun phrases for methods that return values (customerAge, invoiceTotal), and meaningful prefixes or suffixes to group related items (CustomerRepository, OrderService). The impact of thoughtful naming extends beyond individual pieces of code. Well-named elements create a domain-specific vocabulary that teams can use to discuss the system, bridging the gap between technical implementation and business requirements. This shared language becomes particularly valuable in domain-driven design and when collaborating with non-technical stakeholders.

6장

Encapsulation: The Foundation of Maintainable Systems

A recurring theme throughout Fowler's work is the importance of encapsulation - hiding implementation details to create clear boundaries between different parts of a system. Many refactorings serve to improve encapsulation, making systems more resilient to change. This principle is fundamental to object-oriented design and helps manage complexity by creating well-defined interfaces between components. Encapsulation goes beyond just hiding data fields. Fowler introduces techniques like "Encapsulate Record" to transform raw data structures into objects with behavior, and "Encapsulate Collection" to prevent external code from manipulating internal collections directly. For example, instead of exposing a list of orders directly, an Order Management System might provide methods like addOrder() and removeOrder() to maintain invariants and ensure proper validation. This approach prevents bugs that could arise from direct manipulation of the underlying data structure. One particularly valuable insight concerns "Feature Envy" - when a function in one module seems more interested in another module's data. Consider a calculateOrderTotal() method in a Customer class that primarily works with Order data - this is a clear sign of Feature Envy. The solution is often "Move Function," relocating the function to be closer to the data it manipulates. This follows a fundamental design principle: "Put things together that change together." When applied consistently, this principle leads to more cohesive modules that are easier to maintain and modify. Encapsulation also extends to how objects relate to each other. "Hide Delegate" introduces intermediary methods to shield clients from knowing about an object's internal structure. For instance, rather than client code navigating through department.getManager().getName(), you might add a getManagerName() method to Department. Conversely, "Remove Middle Man" eliminates excessive delegation when it becomes bureaucratic - if too many methods simply forward calls, the abstraction might be adding more complexity than value. The goal isn't perfect encapsulation everywhere, but appropriate boundaries that make the system easier to understand and modify. As Fowler notes, "The art is knowing when to stop" - finding the right balance between excessive exposure and needless indirection. This balance often depends on the specific context: a library API might need stronger encapsulation than internal application code. Good encapsulation should reduce coupling while maintaining practical usability. Proper encapsulation also facilitates testing and debugging by providing clear points of control and observation. When implementation details are well-encapsulated, tests can focus on behavior rather than implementation, making them more robust and meaningful. This approach also makes it easier to evolve the system over time, as changes can be made behind stable interfaces without affecting dependent code.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

리팩터링의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

7장

Beyond Classes: Transforming Data and Separating Phases

While many refactoring techniques revolve around object-oriented concepts, Fowler presents powerful alternative patterns for organizing code that draw from functional and procedural paradigms. Two particularly valuable patterns that demonstrate this flexibility are data transformation and phase separation. "Combine Functions into Transform" introduces a functional approach where data flows through a transformation pipeline. Instead of modifying objects in place, this pattern creates new data structures with derived information added as fields. For example, when preparing customer data for reporting, rather than mutating a Customer object, you might create a CustomerReport object that adds calculated fields like lifetime value or risk assessment. This approach works particularly well for read-only operations, such as generating reports, preparing data for display, or computing analytics. The immutable nature of these transformations makes the code easier to test and reason about, while clearly documenting the data flow. "Split Phase" separates complex processes into sequential processing stages with clear intermediate data structures between them. Similar to how compilers separate lexical analysis from parsing and code generation, this pattern makes complex processes more manageable by creating explicit boundaries between different concerns. A practical example is order processing: the first phase might validate and normalize input data, creating a ValidatedOrder structure; the second phase could apply business rules and pricing, producing a PricedOrder; and the final phase might handle fulfillment details, resulting in a ProcessedOrder. Each phase has a clear responsibility and contract with its neighbors. These patterns demonstrate that effective refactoring isn't tied to any particular programming paradigm. Whether you're working with objects, functional transformations, or procedural code, the fundamental principles of good design remain consistent: clear communication of intent, appropriate separation of concerns, and minimizing duplication. The choice of pattern should be driven by the specific requirements and constraints of your problem domain. The transformation pattern shines when dealing with data processing pipelines, especially in scenarios involving data analysis, reporting, or API responses. Phase separation excels at managing complexity in business processes, workflow engines, or any situation where a complex operation can be broken down into discrete steps with clear intermediate states. What matters most is creating code that clearly expresses its intent and can evolve gracefully as requirements change. As Fowler emphasizes, "Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand." These patterns provide different tools for achieving that goal, each with their own strengths and appropriate use cases.

8장

Polymorphism: Simplifying Conditional Logic

Complex conditional logic creates some of the most difficult-to-maintain code, often becoming a source of bugs and technical debt. Fowler introduces several powerful strategies for taming this complexity, with polymorphism emerging as a particularly effective solution for reducing and simplifying conditional statements. "Replace Conditional with Polymorphism" transforms switch statements or if-else chains into a clean class hierarchy where each variant implements its own behavior. This pattern proves especially valuable when the same conditional structure appears in multiple places throughout the codebase, as it centralizes the logic and makes adding new variants more straightforward. Instead of duplicating conditional checks, the behavior is encapsulated within appropriate classes. The theatrical billing example demonstrates this principle elegantly. Initially, the code might contain complex nested if-statements to calculate prices based on play types, audience size, and seasonal factors. Instead of maintaining these intricate conditionals, Fowler creates a class hierarchy with Comedy and Tragedy subclasses that each implement their own pricing rules. Comedy might include special handling for laugh tracks and audience participation, while Tragedy could factor in the production's scale and historical accuracy. Adding a new play type, such as Musical or Historical Drama, becomes as simple as creating a new subclass with its specific pricing logic. For special cases like null values, the "Introduce Special Case" pattern (also known as the Null Object pattern) replaces repetitive null checks with a dedicated object that provides appropriate default behavior. For instance, instead of checking if a customer exists before calculating a discount, a NullCustomer class could automatically return zero discounts. This eliminates scattered conditional code and makes the special case handling explicit and centralized. These refactoring techniques deliver benefits beyond just making code shorter. They make it more expressive by elevating conditional logic from low-level implementation details to explicit design elements. The resulting code more clearly communicates the underlying domain concepts and relationships. When examining the codebase, developers can quickly understand the different variants and their specific behaviors by looking at the class hierarchy rather than deciphering complex conditional statements. The polymorphic approach also provides better extension points. New behaviors can be added without modifying existing code, following the Open-Closed Principle. This makes the codebase more maintainable and reduces the risk of introducing bugs when implementing new features or business rules.

리팩터링에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

9장

The Evolution of Design: Refactoring and Architecture

Perhaps Fowler's most profound insight is how refactoring fundamentally changes our approach to software architecture. Rather than trying to get the design perfect upfront, refactoring enables continuous design improvement throughout development. This shift represents a dramatic departure from traditional waterfall methodologies where architecture was considered a one-time, upfront activity. This approach, which Fowler calls "evolutionary design," addresses a fundamental challenge: we rarely understand a problem well enough at the beginning to create the ideal design. As we build the system and learn more about the domain, our understanding evolves - and refactoring allows the design to evolve with it. For example, what might start as a simple customer management system could evolve to handle complex hierarchical relationships, audit trails, and integration points - changes that would have been difficult to anticipate initially. The evolutionary approach contradicts the traditional "YAGNI" (You Aren't Gonna Need It) principle, which warns against building speculative flexibility. With refactoring as a foundation, developers can confidently build the simplest design that works today, knowing they can evolve it tomorrow when requirements change. This might mean starting with a basic data structure and gradually introducing design patterns like Strategy or Observer as the need becomes clear, rather than implementing them preemptively. This doesn't mean abandoning architectural thinking - rather, it shifts when that thinking happens. Instead of trying to anticipate all future needs upfront, architects can focus on creating clear, well-factored systems that respond gracefully to change. Key architectural decisions, such as service boundaries, database technology choices, and integration patterns, can be revisited and refined as the system grows. The emphasis moves from prediction to adaptation. Fowler's approach has transformed how the industry thinks about software architecture. Rather than seeing design as something completed before coding begins, modern teams recognize it as a continuous activity that extends throughout the system's lifetime. This perspective has enabled the rise of agile methodologies and DevOps practices that emphasize responding to change over following a rigid plan. Teams can now safely make substantial architectural changes even in mature systems, such as breaking monoliths into microservices or replacing core components. The impact of this evolutionary approach extends beyond individual projects. Organizations adopting these practices often find they can deliver features faster, maintain higher quality standards, and respond more quickly to market changes. For example, companies can gradually modernize legacy systems while keeping them operational, or experiment with new architectures without committing to wholesale rewrites. As software continues to eat the world, this ability to evolve systems incrementally without breaking existing functionality has become an essential competitive advantage. Fowler's techniques provide a practical path to achieving this seemingly magical ability - making "Refactoring" not just a technical manual, but a guide to sustainable software development in an ever-changing world. The approach has proven particularly valuable in domains with rapid innovation, such as mobile applications, cloud services, and AI-driven systems, where requirements and best practices evolve constantly.

★★★★★

리팩터링 완독을 축하합니다

100만 명 이상의 학습자가 사랑합니다

“23일째 매일 사용하고 있어요. 이제 제 일상의 한 부분이 되었습니다.”

jayallen

리팩터링의 핵심 주제

code smell identification
behavior preserving transformation
technical debt management
incremental design improvement
software maintainability

리팩터링의 명언

Refactoring isn't about making code 'pretty' - it's about economics.
Regular refactoring actually makes development faster, not slower.
Good programmers write code that humans can understand.
Refactoring is about improving design while preserving functionality.
The discipline of small steps creates a safety net.

리팩터링의 등장인물

Martin FowlerAuthor and software design expert
Kent BeckCreator of Extreme Programming

저자 소개

마틴 파울러(Martin Fowler)는 리팩터링: 기존 코드의 디자인을 개선하는 방법의 저명한 저자이자 소프트웨어 공학 분야의 중추적인 인물로, 애자일 방법론과 진화적 소프트웨어 설계에 대한 전문성으로 널리 알려져 있습니다.

2000년부터 ThoughtWorks의 수석 과학자(Chief Scientist)로 재직 중인 파울러는 현대 소프트웨어 관행을 재정의한 2001년 애자일 소프트웨어 개발 선언문(Manifesto for Agile Software Development)의 공동 작성자이기도 합니다. 그의 작업은 이론과 실무를 연결하며 클린 코드, 유지보수 가능한 시스템, 지속적 인도(Continuous Delivery)를 강조합니다. 이러한 주제들은 영향력 있는 Addison-Wesley Signature Series의 일부인 리팩터링의 핵심 내용입니다.

엔터프라이즈 애플리케이션 아키텍처 패턴 및 도메인 특화 언어를 포함한 파울러의 다른 기초 저서들은 엔터프라이즈 소프트웨어 개발에서 널리 참조되고 있습니다. 그는 자신의 블로그(martinfowler.com), 글로벌 컨퍼런스 강연, 그리고 ThoughtWorks의 업계 리더십을 통해 소프트웨어 모범 사례를 지속적으로 형성해 나가고 있습니다.

리팩터링은 17,000개 이상의 Goodreads 리뷰에서 언급되고 여러 언어로 번역된 프로그래밍의 고전이 되었으며, 전 세계 개발자들에게 필수 도서로서의 지위를 공고히 하고 있습니다.

리팩터링 요약 다운로드

리팩터링 요약을 무료 PDF 또는 EPUB으로 받으세요. 인쇄하거나 오프라인에서 언제든 읽을 수 있습니다.

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

Clean Code

Robert C. Martin

Clean Architecture

Robert C. Martin

Refactoring Legacy Code with Claude 책 표지

Modernizing Legacy Codebases with Claude Code — A Complete Step-by-Step Refactoring Guide | Claude Lab

A Practical Guide to Using Claude Code on Legacy Projects - LinkedIn

Claude Code for Legacy Codebases: A Guide | Richard Joseph Porter

How I use Claude Code to refactor legacy code — without breaking anything - DEV Community

6 sources

Refactoring Legacy Code with Claude

Effective Programming

Jeff Atwood

Tidy First?

Kent Beck

The Pragmatic Programmer: Lessons for Modern Developers 책 표지

23 sources

The Pragmatic Programmer: Lessons for Modern Developers

Effective Java

Joshua Bloch

Rework

Jason Fried

이 책에 대한 FAQ

더 알아보기

학습 계획

Designing and Programming Software

This comprehensive path is designed for developers looking to transition from writing scripts to engineering robust, production-ready systems. It provides the essential bridge between basic syntax and complex architectural decision-making required in modern tech roles.

5 h 53 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Diagnostic for Tool Enshittification

As software platforms increasingly prioritize monetization over utility, developers must learn to identify predatory technical patterns. This guide is essential for software architects and engineers who want to build resilient stacks and avoid becoming locked into decaying ecosystems.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Programming

This comprehensive path bridges the gap between basic syntax and professional system architecture. It is ideal for aspiring developers who want to master both the practical skills of coding and the high-level design patterns used in top-tier tech companies.

5 h 1 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Learn to code from scratch

This comprehensive path bridges the gap between writing your first line of code and architecting complex systems. It is ideal for aspiring developers who want to move beyond basic syntax to master the professional engineering standards required in the tech industry.

4 h 23 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Master Conceptual Tech for Expert Vibecoding

This plan is designed for developers who want to move beyond syntax and master the underlying philosophy of software creation. It is ideal for engineers seeking to bridge the gap between technical execution and high-level architectural intuition.

5 h 59 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Learn software dev

This comprehensive learning path takes you from programming beginner to professional software engineer, covering everything from writing your first line of code to making architectural decisions for large-scale systems. It's ideal for career changers entering tech, self-taught programmers looking to formalize their skills, or junior developers aiming to reach senior-level expertise. The structured progression ensures you build both technical proficiency and the professional mindset needed to succeed in modern software development teams.

4 h 50 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Unconventional Breakup Refactor

This plan is essential for anyone trapped in a cycle of post-breakup rumination and emotional distress. It provides a structured, systems-based approach to recovery for individuals seeking to reclaim their mental clarity and rebuild their lives after a significant loss.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

From Zero to Coder

This comprehensive path bridges the gap between digital literacy and professional software development. It is ideal for absolute beginners who want to move beyond basic syntax to building functional web applications with industry-standard tools.

2 h•5 섹션

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

지금 바로 학습 여정을 시작하세요

9장

리팩터링

개요리팩터링 개요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

The Art of Sustainable Code: Refactoring as a Design Superpower

Why Refactoring Matters: The Economics of Clean Code

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Refactoring Process: Small Steps, Big Impact

Code Smells: Recognizing Problems Worth Solving

리팩터링에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Power of Good Names: Communication Through Code

Encapsulation: The Foundation of Maintainable Systems

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Beyond Classes: Transforming Data and Separating Phases

Polymorphism: Simplifying Conditional Logic

리팩터링에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Evolution of Design: Refactoring and Architecture

리팩터링 완독을 축하합니다

리팩터링의 핵심 주제

리팩터링의 명언

리팩터링의 등장인물

저자 소개

리팩터링 요약 다운로드

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

이 책에 대한 FAQ

What is Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code about?

Who should read Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code?

Is Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code worth reading in 2024?

What are the key code smells discussed in Refactoring?

더 알아보기

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

The Art of Sustainable Code: Refactoring as a Design Superpower

Why Refactoring Matters: The Economics of Clean Code

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Refactoring Process: Small Steps, Big Impact

Code Smells: Recognizing Problems Worth Solving

리팩터링에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Power of Good Names: Communication Through Code

Encapsulation: The Foundation of Maintainable Systems

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Beyond Classes: Transforming Data and Separating Phases

Polymorphism: Simplifying Conditional Logic

리팩터링에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Evolution of Design: Refactoring and Architecture

리팩터링 완독을 축하합니다

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

더 알아보기

리팩터링 개요