What is *How To Be Right in a World Gone Wrong* about?

*How To Be Right in a World Gone Wrong* is a 2018 political commentary by radio host James O'Brien, dissecting modern debates on Brexit, immigration, political correctness, and LGBTQ+ rights. Using conversations from his talk show, O'Brien challenges flawed arguments by deconstructing logical fallacies and media-driven misinformation, urging readers to question populist slogans and think critically.

Who should read *How To Be Right in a World Gone Wrong*?

This book suits readers interested in media bias, political discourse, and societal polarization. It benefits those seeking tools to counter misinformation or understand Brexit-era rhetoric. Critics note O’Brien’s confrontational style may appeal less to classical liberals or readers valuing bipartisan dialogue.

Is *How To Be Right in a World Gone Wrong* worth reading?

Yes, for its incisive analysis of populist rhetoric and media manipulation. O'Brien’s breakdown of callers’ arguments provides actionable insights into spotting logical gaps. However, critics argue its dismissive tone toward opposing views undermines its goal of constructive debate.

What are the main arguments in *How To Be Right in a World Gone Wrong*?

O'Brien argues that media simplification and political slogans (e.g., “Brexit means Brexit”) exploit public distrust. He emphasizes how homophobia and anti-immigrant sentiments stem from flawed logic rather than facts. The book critiques “compassion for the conned,” suggesting tolerance for bigoted views enables harm.

How does James O'Brien address political correctness in the book?

O'Brien defends political correctness as a tool for respect, countering claims of “oversensitivity.” He attributes backlash to media fearmongering and politicians weaponizing language to delegitimize marginalized groups. Examples include dissecting callers’ complaints about LGBTQ+ visibility.

What critiques exist about *How To Be Right in a World Gone Wrong*?

Critics accuse O'Brien of hypocrisy for dismissing opponents as “morally defective” while preaching rational debate. His support for policies like sugar taxes is called simplistic, ignoring non-ideological critiques. Some argue his “gotcha” approach alienates rather than educates.

How does the book analyze Brexit and its supporters?

O'Brien frames Brexit as a product of misleading slogans (“take back control”) and media-driven xenophobia. He dissects callers’ circular logic, showing how frustration with elites was exploited to justify economically harmful policies.

What role does media bias play in *How To Be Right*?

The book blames media for spreading oversimplified narratives (e.g., “political correctness gone mad”) that fuel division. O'Brien highlights how outlets prioritize clicks over nuance, leaving audiences misinformed on issues like immigration or taxation.

대화의 기술

... 잘못되어 가는 세상 속에서

제임스 오브라이언

4.12(11584 Reviews)

대화의 기술 개요

"How to Be Right"에서 제임스 오브라이언은 현대의 논쟁들을 외과 수술과 같은 정밀함으로 해부합니다. 워터스톤즈(Waterstones)와 WH 스미스(WH Smith)에서 이달의 책으로 선정된 이 도발적인 가이드는 브렉시트, 이슬람주의, 그리고 정치적 올바름 이면에 숨겨진 전술들을 폭로합니다. 타인을 소외시키지 않으면서 토론에서 승리할 수 있을까요? 오브라이언이 그 방법을 보여줍니다.

전달 방식을 선택하세요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

대화의 기술의 같은 아이디어를 담았습니다. 나에게 맞는 목소리, 깊이, 속도를 고르고 언제든 바꿔 보세요.

1장

When Being Right Becomes a Full-Time Job

Have you ever noticed how some people seem to hold onto beliefs with such conviction despite all evidence to the contrary? In a world increasingly divided by echo chambers and "alternative facts," James O'Brien has built a career as something of a rarity: a liberal talk radio host who uses the power of simple questions to expose flawed thinking. His approach is deceptively straightforward-listen carefully to what people say, then ask them to explain not just what they believe, but why. The results are often revealing, sometimes uncomfortable, and occasionally transformative. "How to Be Right" became an instant bestseller in the UK, with Stephen Fry calling it "simply unputdownable" and J.K. Rowling praising O'Brien as "one of the most fearless commentators of our time." The book struck a chord during the tumultuous Brexit era, offering a masterclass in critical thinking when it was most needed. What makes O'Brien's approach so compelling is that he doesn't rely on complex arguments or academic jargon-he simply asks people to follow their own logic to its natural conclusion, often revealing the contradictions they've never confronted.

2장

The Power of Listening in a World That Shouts

In today's media landscape, shouting matches have become the norm. Political commentators talk over each other, social media rewards the most outrageous statements, and nuance is sacrificed at the altar of engagement metrics. Against this backdrop, O'Brien's approach feels almost revolutionary-he listens. "People are rarely asked to explain not just what they believe, but why," O'Brien observes. This simple insight forms the foundation of his approach. When callers phone in with strong opinions about immigration, Brexit, or Islam, he doesn't immediately counter with facts or opposing viewpoints. Instead, he asks them to elaborate on their thinking. Take Bob from Colchester, who was convinced immigration was overwhelming Britain. When asked for evidence, his only example was difficulty reaching the tills at his local shop. Or Andy, who claimed his Christian values were being "eroded" despite not practicing Christianity himself. When pressed, he fabricated a story about Muslim-only prayer rooms at his daughter's school-hanging up when challenged. These exchanges reveal something profound about how opinions form in the modern world. Many people hold strong views shaped by media narratives rather than personal experience. They absorb talking points from newspapers and television without critically examining them. When asked to substantiate their beliefs with concrete examples from their own lives, they often struggle. This disconnect between strongly held opinions and personal experience isn't accidental. It serves powerful interests. Immigration myths persist because they conveniently excuse employers paying poor wages, politicians underfunding services, and developers not building enough housing. The Daily Express and Daily Mail stoke fears about immigrants driving down wages while their owners extract millions in profits and pay their own immigrant cleaning staff poverty wages. The most revealing aspect of these conversations is how rarely people question what they're told. As O'Brien puts it, "People somehow enjoy being frightened." Media outlets exploit this tendency because "selling tickets to the ghost train has always been more profitable than selling tickets to the speak-your-weight machine."

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

대화의 기술의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

3장

When Fear Targets Faith: Islam in the Crosshairs

Growing up with an Irish surname in 1970s Britain, O'Brien experienced firsthand how entire communities can be unfairly associated with extremists. His father, a journalist at the pro-Union Daily Telegraph, received hate mail accusing him of spreading "Fenian propaganda" and having the "blood of murdered children" on his hands. While O'Brien faced mostly playground teasing, he recognized even then that people who conflated ordinary Irish people with IRA bombers were unwittingly doing the terrorists' work by fracturing society. Yet after 9/11, he was stunned by how quickly people painted all Muslims as complicit. This remains the most depressing issue covered on his show. British Muslims face a double trauma-they're equally likely to be victims of attacks while simultaneously being blamed for them by former friends and neighbors. The Nice truck attack in 2016 tragically illustrates this point. Over a third of the 84 victims were Muslim, including the first to die-Fatima Charrihi, a mother of seven wearing a hijab. Yet nine months later, after the Westminster Bridge attack, a photo of a Muslim woman in a headscarf looking at her phone near an injured victim went viral as supposed evidence of her callousness. By the time both the woman and photographer came forward to correct the record, explaining she was actually calling for help, the damage was done. This conflation of terrorists with all Muslims isn't limited to internet trolls. The Sun newspaper ran a headline "If We Want Peace... We Need Less Islam" after the London Bridge attack. Former editor Kelvin MacKenzie questioned why a Muslim newsreader in a headscarf should report on the Nice attack-implying she shared some affinity with the terrorist. When callers like Richard from Marlowe insist all Muslims should apologize for terrorist attacks, O'Brien exposes the logical flaw by asking how Sunni and Shia Muslims who "kill each other every single day in Syria" could be considered a monolithic group responsible for each other's actions. This simple question reveals the absurdity of demanding collective responsibility from 1.8 billion diverse individuals. What's most revealing is how many people have lost the desire to question what they're being told. Their bespoke, unchallenged diet of "news," augmented by algorithms and deliberately fake stories, has convinced them to be "more concerned" about Muslims who haven't done anything wrong. This mindset serves both terrorists and politicians who benefit from societal divisions.

4장

Brexit: The Undefined Victory

"I still don't understand what Brexit supporters thought they won," O'Brien confesses. For years before Cameron's referendum, he was baffled by people convinced they were oppressed by "unelected bureaucrats in Brussels" yet unable to name a single EU law they wanted abolished. By October 2016, watching people like Nigel Farage retreat from positions about being like Norway or Switzerland while the Prime Minister claimed the "will of the people" had determined Britain could be nothing like those countries became surreal. What had initially seemed funny became downright depressing as anger shifted from the misled voters to those still selling the snake oil. Take Andy the plumber, who admitted voting for Brexit despite knowing it would cause him "short-term personal financial loss." When pressed about which EU laws he was eager to escape, he first mentioned "the shape of your bananas"-a notorious Boris Johnson fabrication. When further challenged, Andy admitted he couldn't name a single law. His justification then shifted to vague complaints about Brussels being "very political," before finally landing on immigration. Despite claiming not to be xenophobic, Andy complained about "mobs of immigrants not willing to integrate" in Nottingham city center. When asked how Brexit would address this since these people were already in the UK, he struggled to explain, eventually suggesting we could "integrate them" without "human rights being involved." Similarly, Sean from Uxbridge revealed the racial undertones behind some "legitimate concerns" about immigration when he complained about not seeing enough "white faces" in A&E. When challenged about which EU countries have predominantly non-white populations, he couldn't name any, eventually admitting the country had "lost its identity." This aversion to critical thinking reached its apex with Theresa May's vacuous "Brexit means Brexit" slogan-a phrase designed to discourage thought and postpone reality. The truly nasty element is how it treats Brexit supporters as idiots who can be placated with fatuous soundbites while dissenters are maligned as "sneering elites" and questions dismissed as unpatriotic. Sean's conversation revealed deeper racial anxieties when he complained about seeing too many "Indian or Pakistani people" behind supermarket tills, claiming this was "why people voted to leave Europe"-despite these demographics having nothing to do with EU membership. When pressed on this contradiction, he couldn't reconcile his complaints about non-EU immigrants with his Brexit vote.

대화의 기술에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

5장

Beyond Prejudice: The Evolution of LGBT Acceptance

Orwell's description of the "Two Minutes Hate" in Nineteen Eighty-Four perfectly captures how right-wing tabloids and radio phone-ins direct public rage-"an abstract, undirected emotion which could be switched from one object to another like the flame of a blowlamp." This fickleness of fury is actually encouraging. It suggests prejudice might not be deeply rooted and could potentially be uprooted through simple questioning. Since O'Brien began broadcasting in 2004, he's watched public contempt shift targets-from single mothers to welfare claimants to "Schrodinger's immigrant" (simultaneously stealing jobs and living on benefits). Homosexuality has always remained a contentious topic, though O'Brien has found the most hope here that people can change their perspectives. His approach to dismantling homophobia is deceptively simple: listen carefully to what people say and frame questions accordingly. When callers insist homosexuality is a "lifestyle choice," he asks one simple question: "When did you choose to be straight?" Their inevitable answer-"I didn't choose, I was born straight"-reveals the logical inconsistency in their position. Religious homophobes present different challenges. During an exchange with David, a lay preacher, O'Brien repeatedly asked what Jesus actually said about homosexuality. Despite asking the question over and over, David refused to acknowledge Jesus never mentioned homosexuality. The Old Testament provides more ammunition against homophobia. When callers cite Leviticus 18:22 about homosexuality being an "abomination," O'Brien counters by asking about other "abominations" like eating shellfish or wearing mixed fabrics. These biblical inconsistencies expose selective moral outrage. Recently, the "blowlamp" of public outrage has shifted from homosexuality to trans people. O'Brien finds himself conflicted on this issue-convinced by trans women that they deserve to be treated as women, yet understanding non-trans women's concerns about predatory males potentially exploiting self-identification laws. The tragic case of Lucy Meadows illustrates what's at stake. After a primary school teacher announced her transition from Mr. Upton to Miss Meadows, Daily Mail columnist Richard Littlejohn wrote a cruel piece headlined "He's not only in the wrong body... he's in the wrong job." Two and a half months later, Lucy took her own life. At her inquest, the coroner condemned the press: "Lucy Meadows was not somebody who had thrust herself into the public limelight... Her only crime was to be different. Not by choice but by some trick of nature."

6장

The Myth of Political Correctness Gone Mad

The war against "political correctness" is waged by those seeking to silence opinions they find uncomfortable and arrest social developments they consider threatening to their privileged status quo. The irony is that these warriors against PC culture spend their lives being offended by just about everything while claiming "you can't give offence, you can only take it." It's fascinating how people offended by everything-from gay marriage to inclusive toilets-insist they're enemies of those who take unnecessary offense. O'Brien's radio switchboard could be filled six times over with callers railing against "snowflakes," completely missing the irony that they're taking violent offense at innocuous actions they'd never know about if media wasn't keeping them perpetually outraged. The narrative of "political correctness gone mad" often relies on twisted facts. Take Marian from Sutton Coldfield, convinced that Union Flags were routinely removed to avoid offending Muslims. When O'Brien researched the single case in Radstock, Somerset that spawned this myth, he found the council simply chose a Union Flag over St. George's flag for their single flagpole. The Muslim Cultural Society actually called this "political correctness going too far," and the Muslim Council of Britain supported St. George as "a national symbol of inclusivity." Yet headlines twisted this into Muslims demanding flag removal, leading to death threats against a councillor. Perhaps the most infamous example of manufactured outrage is "Winterval." For years, people insisted "you weren't even allowed to celebrate Christmas anymore" because it had been renamed. The reality? Birmingham City Council briefly used "Winterval" as an umbrella term for a winter festival season that prominently featured Christmas alongside Diwali, Chinese New Year, and other celebrations. The promotional brochure used "Christmas" three times on its cover alone, featured the city's Christmas tree, and included carol singing and traditional decorations. The council even hung a "Merry Christmas" banner across the town hall. When pressed to define "political correctness," people struggle. Geoff from Macclesfield initially defined it as "trying to say or do something that doesn't offend anybody at all"-until O'Brien pointed out that Geoff himself was offended by John Lewis selling gender-neutral children's clothes. When asked why this bothered him enough to call in, Geoff eventually admitted his real concern: fear that someday it might become "illegal to refer to boys and girls separately." Yet when asked how such a hypothetical ban would affect him personally, he conceded "it wouldn't change my sense of self" and couldn't articulate how it would negatively impact his life.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

대화의 기술의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

7장

The Feminist Challenge to Everyday Sexism

Many apparently straight, white men have come to believe they are the real victims of discrimination in modern society. As a straight white man himself, O'Brien finds this completely absurd but no longer funny-especially after the 2018 Toronto van attack by a self-described "incel" (involuntary celibate). This male supremacist movement offers men excuses for their failures while absolving them of responsibility. At its heart, sexism is about dominion-the belief that men should have complete control over women. Most men find it hard to understand how systemic this is. A pivotal lesson O'Brien learned came from Fiona, a City lawyer who called about an incident from early in her career. When alone in an elevator with a shy senior partner who told her he "loved the way she filled out" her jeans, she felt deeply uncomfortable-not threatened, but disturbed. She realized he was essentially telling her he'd imagined her partially naked. This seemingly banal comment revealed how words, not just intention, can create discomfort. Some women believe policing inappropriate behavior is their job. If they're comfortable threatening to punch a man who places a hand on their knee, they might overlook how someone like Fiona felt in that elevator. But if a woman doesn't feel comfortable confronting harassment, whose job is it? Society must establish conventions clear enough that any man behaving inappropriately knows he's transgressed. What's "normal" has evolved dramatically-doctors once advertised cigarettes, people owned slaves, and marital rape wasn't criminalized in the UK until 1984. The Criminal Review Committee's language from that time essentially described forced marital sex as merely "a failure of the marital relationship." Learning this history makes O'Brien realize some people would welcome a return to those days. In January 2018, a Financial Times journalist went undercover at the Presidents Club Dinner where 360 wealthy men were "entertained" by 130 "hostesses" in short dresses and high heels. Women reported being groped, grabbed, and propositioned after signing non-disclosure agreements. When discussing this on his show, caller Lorraine suggested the women should have complained on the night, placing responsibility on them rather than the perpetrators. The exchange revealed how some still believe harassment should be handled privately, protecting powerful men from public accountability rather than changing the culture that enables such behavior.

8장

The False Freedom of the Free Market

Fixed-odds betting terminals (FOBTs) changed O'Brien's understanding of "free choice" and libertarian arguments. These machines, designed using behavioral psychology to maximize harm through frequent small wins and quick 100 stakes every twenty seconds, deliberately target the poorest communities. Despite claims about personal responsibility, these machines represent "state-corporate harm maximization" rather than genuine free choice. Classical liberals mask feelings of inadequacy by casting themselves as superior, believing government should only protect us from each other, not ourselves. They typically fall into two categories: beneficiaries of inherited inequality who believe their advantages are "natural," and disadvantaged people who mistakenly believe they'll someday join the winners-"temporarily embarrassed millionaires." When discussing Britain's 2018 sugar tax on drinks, caller Henry from Fulham objected to paying more because "other people are too stupid" to understand health risks. O'Brien challenged him on whether the tax would actually impact his finances (it wouldn't) and how he gained his own knowledge about sugar's dangers (through school). This exchange reveals how opponents of "nanny state" policies often claim to defend freedom while ignoring how commercial interests manipulate consumer choices. The Sunny Delight story perfectly demonstrates this-a product marketed as healthy that was 95% water and corn syrup, positioned in chiller cabinets to suggest nutritional value, showing how "free choice" is anything but when multi-national corporations spend millions on persuasion while health advocates struggle to be heard. Jamie Oliver endures constant abuse for suggesting people need help making healthy choices, particularly his proposal that fast food outlets shouldn't open near schools. When caller Gary insisted "It's none of Jamie Oliver's business what my kids eat," O'Brien pointed out the massive imbalance: children are bombarded with junk food advertising everywhere while receiving almost no counter-messaging about health risks. In poorer areas especially, high streets are dominated by takeaways, normalizing unhealthy options.

대화의 기술에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

9장

The Generational Divide That's Reshaping Politics

If we avoid an apocalyptic culture war, Britain's biggest political battle will be based on age and money. This is under-reported because it's creeping up incrementally and pits family members against each other, while aging newspaper readers don't want to hear they've secured a disproportionate share of national wealth that younger generations need access to. Born in 1972 (Generation X), O'Brien took for granted he'd match or exceed his parents financially, attend university, and become a homeowner. For millennials (1981-2000), everything's different. Research shows they earn 8,000 less in their twenties than the previous generation, their chances of homeownership have halved, and they graduate with average debts of 50,800 while his generation left with none. In 2000, O'Brien and his wife borrowed their flat's full purchase price plus extra for furniture, on modest journalist salaries, buying on the edge of Notting Hill. Today, people with six-figure incomes can't afford London homes. They pay more in rent than mortgage payments would be, essentially buying homes for their landlords because they can't raise hefty deposits. Many beneficiaries of this generational divide resist acknowledging it. When callers like Doris claim young people could buy homes if they "knuckled down" like her generation did, they ignore the stark mathematics: in 1966, the average house cost about 3.5 times annual salary; today it's 8.5 times. Despite showing these calculations, there's a psychological resistance to accepting that young people face genuinely harder circumstances. The status quo has shifted dramatically. Young people no longer presume property ownership is their birthright, and our concept of "normal" has changed. This raises a troubling question: what are people working for today? Financial security itself is changing. While O'Brien wards off anxiety by knowing he could downsize his home, millennials who can't buy property live "genteel hand-to-mouth," spending on leisure because saving while renting won't meaningfully change their relationship with the property market. They develop little concept of long-term security. This situation portends disaster: generations of future pensioners who've paid enough rent to cover several mortgages but own nothing. With homes increasingly sold to fund social care, even expected inheritances may disappear. We're heading toward wealth concentrated in an ever-shrinking section of society alongside a catastrophic social care crisis. The workplace has transformed dramatically across generations. The Silent Generation (1925-1945) expected jobs for life and comfortable retirements. Generation X recognized job security was no longer guaranteed. Millennials face both employment insecurity and unattainable property ownership, losing the equity that provided previous generations with financial safety nets. Modern employment increasingly resembles pre-union era piecework, with companies like Uber representing a serious assault on established commercial norms. They insert profit-extracting middlemen between suppliers and customers while passing business risks to underpaid, overworked workers who lack traditional employment protections.

10장

Trump's Alternative Reality and the Death of Truth

In 1990, Mike Godwin formulated "Godwin's Law"-that online discussions eventually lead to Nazi comparisons. Yet by August 2017, after white nationalists and neo-Nazis rallied in Charlottesville leaving one counter-protester dead and Trump commented there were "very fine people, on both sides," Godwin himself tweeted support for Nazi comparisons. Just eight months into Trump's presidency, violent racists marched unhooded on American streets, shattering the naive hope that support for Trump would dissolve as his depravity emerged. Trump's appeal was deliberately rooted in white supremacy, not "economic insecurity." He fed supporters meaningless slogans to chant at rallies where he openly mocked disabled journalists and Muslim Gold Star families. His strategy was simple: validate anger, provide targets, disable critical thinking, and offer self-serving alternative narratives. Trump supporters gloss over contradictions-like chanting "Lock Her Up" about Clinton while ignoring that Trump's own campaign manager Manafort was actually imprisoned. Trump understood that treating people as hate-filled and gullible while helping them blame "others" would earn their unwavering loyalty. Trump's "fake news" rhetoric created an alternative reality where his lies weren't lies. This became clear just days after his inauguration when Press Secretary Sean Spicer falsely claimed Trump's inauguration had "the largest audience ever." When challenged, Kellyanne Conway infamously introduced "alternative facts" to the lexicon. This early episode demonstrated how Trump's team had already corrupted the relationship between people and objective truth, allowing them to write their own reality regardless of observable facts. Trump supporters like "Brian from Peterborough" demonstrate complete abandonment of reality. When confronted with Trump's documented mocking of disabled people, they simultaneously deny it happened while claiming it was "during the campaign." They constantly shift arguments when cornered, moving from defending Trump's behavior to asking about "the economy" or "Brexit." Despite seeing video evidence of Trump boasting about sexual assault, mocking disabled people, and implementing policies separating children from parents, supporters refuse to acknowledge reality. These followers crave the comfort of a strongman telling them everything will be alright, while blaming invisible enemies for their problems rather than their political heroes.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

대화의 기술의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

11장

The Path Forward: Reclaiming Reason in Public Discourse

Writing about contemporary society poses obvious challenges as things change rapidly. Recent positive developments include Paul Dacre leaving the Daily Mail and Infowars being removed from social media platforms, but much remains concerning. Politicians from the House of Commons to Hungary flirt dangerously with prejudices that devastated Europe last century. Journalism has largely failed its duty, prioritizing manufactured conflict over evidence-based reasoning. The assault on objectivity began with climate change debates, where fringe voices received equal airtime to scientific consensus. This "false equivalence" spread to vaccination debates and Brexit, where bloviating blowhards face experts while insisting everything will be fine if we just "believe" more. O'Brien's book offers a roadmap for reclaiming reason in public discourse. By asking simple questions and refusing to accept nonsensical answers, we can expose the contradictions in harmful beliefs. By listening more and talking less, we can understand where people's fears and anxieties truly come from. And by refusing to accept "alternative facts," we can defend the very concept of objective truth. In a world increasingly dominated by those who shout the loudest, O'Brien's quiet approach of asking "Why do you think that?" might just be the revolution we need.

★★★★★

대화의 기술 완독을 축하합니다

100만 명 이상의 학습자가 사랑합니다

“23일째 매일 사용하고 있어요. 이제 제 일상의 한 부분이 되었습니다.”

jayallen

대화의 기술의 핵심 주제

critical thinking
socratic questioning
media manipulation
logical fallacies
echo chamber deconstruction

대화의 기술의 명언

People are rarely asked to explain not just what they believe, but why.
I still don't understand what Brexit supporters thought they won.

대화의 기술의 등장인물

James O’BrienAuthor and liberal talk radio host
Bob from ColchesterRadio caller who discussed immigration
AndyRadio caller who discussed Christian values
Fatima CharrihiMuslim victim of the Nice truck attack
Richard from MarloweRadio caller who discussed collective responsibility

저자 소개

How to Be Right… in a World Gone Wrong의 베스트셀러 작가인 제임스 오브라이언(James O’Brien)은 영리한 정치 평론과 공공 담론에 대한 전문성으로 잘 알려진 영국의 저명한 저널리스트이자 라디오 진행자입니다. 현대 사회의 양극화를 비판한 이 책은 LBC의 수상 경력에 빛나는 전화 연결 프로그램을 20년 동안 진행해 온 오브라이언의 경력을 바탕으로, 미디어 수사학과 문화적 갈등에 대한 날카로운 분석을 담고 있습니다. 나이절 파라지(Nigel Farage)와 같은 인물들과의 화제가 된 인터뷰에서 보여준 그의 직설적인 인터뷰 스타일은 잘못된 정보에 맞서고 건설적인 토론을 장려하려는 그의 의지를 잘 보여줍니다.

오브라이언의 권위는 Daily Express 칼럼니스트, Newsnight의 빈번한 객원 진행자, 그리고 문학, 정치, 예술계 인사들과 대담을 나누는 인터뷰 팟캐스트 Full Disclosure의 호스트로서의 배경에서 비롯됩니다. 그의 전작인 Loathe Thy Neighbour는 계급과 정체성 정치를 탐구하며 사회적 긴장을 해부하는 그만의 독보적인 영역을 구축했습니다.

2017년 영국 언론인 협회(British Press Guild) 선정 "올해의 라디오 방송인"인 오브라이언의 작업은 영국 미디어와 정치 분석에서 자주 인용됩니다. *How to Be Right…*는 Sunday Times 베스트셀러 5위에 올랐으며, 현대의 소통과 비판적 사고에 관한 중요한 텍스트로서의 입지를 굳혔습니다.

대화의 기술 요약 다운로드

대화의 기술 요약을 무료 PDF 또는 EPUB으로 받으세요. 인쇄하거나 오프라인에서 언제든 읽을 수 있습니다.

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

How Not to Be Wrong

James O'Brien

The Art of Always Being Right

A.C. Grayling

Learning to Disagree

John Inazu

Win Every Argument

Mehdi Hasan

How to Have Impossible Conversations

Peter Boghossian & James A. Lindsay

I Respectfully Disagree

Justin Jones-Fosu

Thank You for Arguing

Jay Heinrichs

Asking the right questions

M. Neil Browne

이 책에 대한 FAQ

더 알아보기

학습 계획

How to argue

Effective argumentation is a foundational skill for success in any field where ideas matter—from business negotiations to academic discourse to everyday relationships. This learning plan benefits professionals seeking to influence stakeholders, students developing critical thinking abilities, and anyone who wants to communicate more persuasively while maintaining intellectual integrity and fostering genuine understanding.

5 h 15 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Strategist's Guide to Clear Thinking

In an era of information overload, the ability to think structurally and argue ethically is a critical leadership asset. This guide is designed for professionals and decision-makers who need to strip away noise, validate evidence, and lead through high-level persuasion and debate.

2 h•4 섹션

학습 계획

Read the Room and Win

In today’s competitive landscape, the ability to decode human behavior is a superpower for professionals and leaders. This plan is designed for anyone looking to master social intelligence, from closing high-stakes deals to navigating office politics with ease.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Become better at talking, argumenting

Effective communication is the cornerstone of professional leadership and personal influence. This plan is designed for professionals and aspiring leaders who want to transform their debating skills into a powerful tool for negotiation and persuasion.

4 h 41 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Human Book: Decoding Hidden Intent

In an era of complex communication, understanding what remains unsaid is a critical competitive advantage. This plan is essential for leaders, negotiators, and recruiters who need to master behavioral baselines, facial analysis, and linguistic markers to navigate high-stakes interactions.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Combat logical fallacies

In an era of misinformation, the ability to think critically is a vital survival skill. This plan is designed for professionals, students, and citizens who want to sharpen their decision-making and resist manipulation in complex public and private debates.

5 h 25 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Art of Conversational Competence

In an era where communication defines professional success, mastering the nuances of human interaction is essential. This plan is designed for leaders and professionals who need to navigate high-stakes conflicts and persuade diverse audiences with poise.

2 h•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Birth of Wisdom

This plan bridges the gap between ancient logic and modern existential critique, offering a powerful toolkit for independent thought. It is ideal for students of philosophy, debaters, or anyone seeking to liberate their mind from conventional biases.

1 h•2 섹션

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

지금 바로 학습 여정을 시작하세요

9장

대화의 기술

개요대화의 기술 개요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

When Being Right Becomes a Full-Time Job

The Power of Listening in a World That Shouts

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

When Fear Targets Faith: Islam in the Crosshairs

Brexit: The Undefined Victory

대화의 기술에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Beyond Prejudice: The Evolution of LGBT Acceptance

The Myth of Political Correctness Gone Mad

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Feminist Challenge to Everyday Sexism

The False Freedom of the Free Market

대화의 기술에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Generational Divide That's Reshaping Politics

Trump's Alternative Reality and the Death of Truth

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Path Forward: Reclaiming Reason in Public Discourse

대화의 기술 완독을 축하합니다

대화의 기술의 핵심 주제

대화의 기술의 명언

대화의 기술의 등장인물

저자 소개

대화의 기술 요약 다운로드

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

이 책에 대한 FAQ

What is How To Be Right in a World Gone Wrong about?

Who should read How To Be Right in a World Gone Wrong?

Is How To Be Right in a World Gone Wrong worth reading?

What are the main arguments in How To Be Right in a World Gone Wrong?

더 알아보기

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

When Being Right Becomes a Full-Time Job

The Power of Listening in a World That Shouts

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

When Fear Targets Faith: Islam in the Crosshairs

Brexit: The Undefined Victory

대화의 기술에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Beyond Prejudice: The Evolution of LGBT Acceptance

The Myth of Political Correctness Gone Mad

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Feminist Challenge to Everyday Sexism

The False Freedom of the Free Market

대화의 기술에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Generational Divide That's Reshaping Politics

Trump's Alternative Reality and the Death of Truth

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Path Forward: Reclaiming Reason in Public Discourse

대화의 기술 완독을 축하합니다

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

더 알아보기

대화의 기술 개요