What is *Bad Therapy: Why the Kids Aren't Growing Up* about?

*Bad Therapy* critiques modern mental health practices, arguing that over-therapizing, over-medication, and lowered expectations harm children’s resilience. Abigail Shrier investigates how therapeutic interventions, social media, and parenting trends contribute to rising anxiety and delayed adulthood milestones. The book challenges the notion that therapy is universally beneficial for kids, highlighting unintended consequences like emotional fragility.

Who should read *Bad Therapy: Why the Kids Aren't Growing Up*?

Parents, educators, and policymakers concerned about children’s mental health trends will find this book provocative. It’s also relevant for therapists seeking to reflect on industry practices. Shrier’s arguments appeal to readers skeptical of mainstream mental health approaches and those interested in fostering resilience in children.

Is *Bad Therapy* worth reading?

Yes, for its controversial yet evidence-backed critique of child therapy’s pitfalls. While criticized for oversimplification, Shrier’s investigative journalism raises valid concerns about overdiagnosis and therapeutic overreach. The book sparks debate on balancing mental health support with fostering independence, making it a thought-provoking read despite its polarizing stance.

What are the main arguments in *Bad Therapy*?

Shrier claims modern therapy often worsens kids’ mental health by: - Encouraging hyper-focus on emotions and rumination. - Rewarding emotional suffering while undermining resilience. - Promoting overdiagnosis of conditions like ADHD and anxiety. - Lowering parental authority and societal expectations for maturity.

How does *Bad Therapy* criticize modern parenting trends?

Shrier argues that parents now prioritize emotional validation over teaching grit, often deferring to therapists instead of setting boundaries. Overprotection, “gentle parenting,” and avoidance of discomfort, she claims, leave kids ill-equipped to handle adversity. Examples include shielding children from failure and pathologizing normal developmental challenges.

What solutions does Abigail Shrier propose in *Bad Therapy*?

- Reduce reliance on therapy for non-severe issues. - Restore parental authority and high expectations. - Encourage unsupervised play and risk-taking to build resilience. - Limit social media and smartphone use to curb anxiety.

How does *Bad Therapy* address the role of therapists?

Shrier accuses many therapists of applying adult-focused methods (e.g., trauma-informed care) to children, despite limited evidence. She argues therapists often pathologize normal behavior, use leading questions that distort kids’ self-perception, and prioritize validation over problem-solving. Case studies describe therapy exacerbating anxiety or creating new insecurities.

What criticisms has *Bad Therapy* received?

Critics argue Shrier: - Overgeneralizes from anecdotes while dismissing systemic mental health crises. - Ignores benefits of therapy for severe cases (contradicting her own disclaimer). - Romanticizes past parenting styles without acknowledging their flaws. - Fails to address socioeconomic factors influencing mental health.

나쁜 치료

아이들이 어른이 되지 못하는 이유

애비게일 슈라이어

3.98(13309 Reviews)

나쁜 치료 개요

"나쁜 치료(Bad Therapy)"에서 애비게일 슈라이어는 현대 육아의 과도한 심리 치료 의존 경향에 대담하게 도전합니다. 조 로건의 지지를 받고 조던 피터슨이 출연한 이 도발적인 비평은 다음과 같은 질문을 던집니다. 우리의 "온화한" 접근 방식이 사실 아이들의 성장을 가로막고 있는 것은 아닐까? 회복탄력성 있는 아이를 키우는 방식을 재정립하며 문화적 화두를 던지는 작품입니다.

전달 방식을 선택하세요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

나쁜 치료의 같은 아이디어를 담았습니다. 나에게 맞는 목소리, 깊이, 속도를 고르고 언제든 바꿔 보세요.

1장

The Therapy Trap: How Mental Health Culture Is Making Us Sicker

In a culture obsessed with wellness, Abigail Shrier's "Bad Therapy" arrives as a bracing counternarrative. The book has sparked fierce debate since publication, with mental health professionals divided over its provocative thesis. Celebrities from Joe Rogan to Jonathan Haidt have praised its courage, while critics argue it oversimplifies complex issues. What makes this book particularly relevant is its timing-arriving amid skyrocketing youth mental health diagnoses and unprecedented levels of anxiety among young Americans. Shrier, a Yale Law graduate and Wall Street Journal contributor whose previous work on gender dysphoria generated similar controversy, doesn't just question whether we're overdiagnosing mental illness-she suggests our therapeutic culture itself may be causing the very problems it claims to solve.

2장

When Healers Harm: The Dangers of Unnecessary Therapy

Any medical intervention carries risk-this principle, well-established in physical medicine, applies equally to mental health treatments. "Iatrogenesis," harm originating from the healer, doesn't just happen through malpractice but through well-intentioned treatments applied inappropriately. Consider "psychological debriefing" for disaster victims, once standard practice, now known to worsen PTSD symptoms in up to 40% of cases. Or the D.A.R.E. anti-drug program that inadvertently increased substance use among teens by as much as 29% in some studies. These aren't isolated failures but symptoms of a broader problem: therapy isn't a benign folk remedy but a powerful intervention capable of both helping and harming. The risks are substantial and often overlooked. Therapy can lead clients to reorganize their identity around diagnoses, creating what psychologists call "learned helplessness" or a "sick role." It can encourage family estrangement through misattributed blame, exacerbate depression through excessive rumination, compromise natural resilience by creating dependency, and foster an unhealthy attachment to the therapeutic process. Research shows police officers who underwent mandatory debriefing after witnessing trauma exhibited 41% more hyperarousal symptoms than untreated colleagues. Similarly, burn victims showed increased anxiety after therapy, with follow-up studies revealing a 15% higher rate of post-traumatic stress. Perhaps most troubling, standardized bereavement counseling often hindered natural recovery processes, with studies showing that 38% of participants experienced delayed healing. Despite these documented risks, most therapists minimize potential harms, rarely discussing the possibility of negative outcomes with clients. Unlike medical doctors who must formally acknowledge treatment risks and obtain informed consent, therapists typically don't systematically track side effects or warn clients of potential downsides. This reluctance stems partly from the fact that therapists themselves are the "medicine"-admitting failure feels deeply personal and threatens professional identity. Their incentives are also problematic: treating mildly affected patients for extended periods is more profitable than handling difficult cases like schizophrenia, leading to what some critics call "therapeutic drift." When iatrogenic risks go unmeasured, the greatest harm falls on the healthiest patients-those with little to gain and everything to risk from unnecessary treatment. Studies indicate that up to 10% of therapy clients experience significant deterioration, with the highest rates among those with milder initial symptoms. As one prominent psychiatrist bluntly puts it: "A good rule is don't expose yourself to unnecessary interventions, including therapy." This doesn't mean avoiding therapy altogether, but rather approaching it with appropriate caution and reserving it for conditions where its benefits clearly outweigh its risks.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

나쁜 치료의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

3장

The Paradox: More Treatment, Worse Outcomes

Today's youth represent the most psychologically monitored, diagnosed, and treated generation in history-yet they're also the most anxious, depressed, and fearful on record. This creates what researchers call the "Treatment-Prevalence Paradox": unlike medical conditions where increased treatment reduces prevalence, mental health problems have ballooned despite more sophisticated and available treatments. This paradox becomes even more striking when compared to physical health conditions, where treatment advances typically lead to better outcomes. The statistics are staggering: nearly 40 percent of Gen Z has received mental health treatment, far more than previous generations. A stunning 42 percent carry mental health diagnoses, making "normal" increasingly rare. These diagnoses have become identity markers, proudly displayed in social media profiles alongside names and photos, with terms like "anxiety," "ADHD," and "depression" becoming common biographical details. Meanwhile, experts insist even more youth have undiagnosed conditions, suggesting psychological normality is becoming anomalous. This medicalization of normal emotional experiences has created a culture where temporary struggles are often pathologized into permanent conditions. Since World War II, mental health services have expanded exponentially. American Psychological Association membership quadrupled between 1946 and 1960, then quadrupled again from 1970 to 1995. Mental health spending has doubled nearly every decade since 1986, reaching unprecedented levels of investment in psychological services and medication. Yet adolescent mental health has steadily declined since the 1950s, with teen suicide rates quadrupling between 1950 and 1988. This trend has continued into the 21st century, with each new generation reporting higher levels of psychological distress than the last. While smartphones clearly exacerbate these problems through sleep disruption, social comparison, and constant connectivity, neither parents, schools, nor mental health organizations have taken meaningful action to restrict teen usage. The absurdity reaches its peak with therapists offering treatment via text message-embedding therapy in the very device causing harm. During COVID-19 lockdowns, mental health organizations failed to oppose the devastating isolation imposed on children, even as these same organizations actively engaged in other political issues. The pandemic response highlighted how mental health institutions often prioritize conformity to prevailing narratives over children's psychological well-being. Rather than helping children place fears in perspective, experts often validate catastrophic thinking. When asked if it would ever be appropriate to tell a child they're exaggerating climate threats, one expert recoiled, calling such an approach "invalidating." This represents a fundamental shift from traditional therapeutic approaches that emphasized resilience and coping skills. By validating apocalyptic fears rather than providing reassurance, adults effectively breathe life into the monster under the bed, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy where anxiety becomes a permanent state rather than a temporary challenge to overcome. This approach has created a generation that sees itself as fundamentally fragile and in need of constant professional support.

4장

Ten Steps to Bad Therapy: How We're Making Kids Worse

Bad therapy follows predictable patterns that worsen rather than improve mental health. First, it teaches kids to pay excessive attention to their emotions. While a rich emotional vocabulary helps children, telling them their feelings are "always valid" and should guide behavior is problematic. Emotions are unstable, manipulable, and often misleading. Psychologist Yulia Chentsova Dutton warns that excessive focus on emotions can worsen distress, and Michael Linden adds that regularly asking children about their feelings induces negative responses: "Asking somebody 'how are you feeling?' is inducing negative feelings." Second, therapy often induces rumination-obsessively brooding over past injuries and personal problems. While venting provides temporary relief, rehashing the same hurts can become pathological. Professor Leif Kennair explains that many therapeutic interventions actually increase worry and rumination, noting that "rumination is the major predictor for depression." Third, therapy makes happiness a goal while paradoxically rewarding emotional suffering. Research shows the more vigorously you hunt happiness, the more disappointed you're likely to be. Meanwhile, kids receive social rewards for expressing suffering, leading them to "amplify their signal of how much they suffer." As one high school senior observes, today's teens identify with their struggles rather than their strengths. Fourth, therapists often affirm and accommodate anxieties rather than helping children overcome them. This approach brings short-term relief but can solidify worries, suggesting everyday challenges are emergencies requiring evasive action. In contrast, evidence-based therapies like CBT use exposure therapy-helping patients confront fears directly. Fifth, constant monitoring creates anxiety. Peter Gray observes that "kids today are always under the situation of an observer"-whether parents at home, teachers at school, or instructors during activities. This constant surveillance is functionally equivalent to adding anxiety. When psychologists want to create stress in research settings, they simply add an observer. Sixth, diagnoses are dispensed liberally, fundamentally altering children's self-perception. When children grow up believing there's something wrong with their brains, their sense of efficacy diminishes-they may believe they cannot improve circumstances on their own. Seventh, psychiatric medication becomes the default solution. Altering a child's brain chemistry is one of the most profound parental decisions, yet many doctors treat it as routine. These medications impose brutal side effects on already struggling teens: weight gain, sleeplessness, diminished sex drive, fatigue, addiction risk, and sometimes suicidality. Eighth, children are encouraged to share their "trauma," despite evidence that talking about trauma doesn't always help. Many patients are actually harmed by being forced to discuss traumatic experiences. As physician Richard Byng explains: "Really good trauma-informed work does not mean that you get people to talk about it. Quite the opposite." Ninth, young adults are encouraged to break contact with "toxic" family members. Family estrangement has increased dramatically, with nearly 30 percent of American adults having cut off a family member. When confronted, estranged adult children often cite therapist-provided language: "My therapist said you emotionally abused me." Finally, therapy creates treatment dependency, undermining someone's sense of agency and self-belief. "We're just teaching people that they're not adequate humans," says Dr. Byng. Young people trained to seek approval before taking small risks may feel incapable of meeting basic adult challenges.

나쁜 치료에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

5장

The School Therapy Machine: When Education Becomes Treatment

Today's schools have transformed into centers of amateur psychological diagnosis and treatment. Teachers regularly diagnose conditions like anxiety based on minimal observation, while expanded psychology staffs monitor teaching quality, identify emotional disturbances, and adjust academic requirements accordingly. Modern classrooms begin with "emotions check-ins" rather than academic work, asking children to publicly categorize their feelings through metaphors like "daisy bright" or "no bones days." This constant attention to feelings likely undermines children's emotional stability rather than improving it, inducing a harmful "state orientation" that makes them less capable of completing tasks. Schools have dramatically expanded their psychological staff, with California alone planning to hire 10,000 additional counselors. These counselors provide therapy sessions during school hours and routinely intervene with teachers on students' behalf. However, this creates problematic "dual relationships" where counselors simultaneously act as therapists, academic intermediaries, and parental substitutes while reporting to school administration rather than parents. Social-emotional learning (SEL) has transformed classrooms into group therapy sessions with untrained facilitators. In one Salt Lake City fifth-grade class, a teacher's question "What is something making you really sad?" triggered a chain reaction of sobbing children sharing family traumas. Popular SEL curricula explicitly prompt students to revisit and discuss traumatic or embarrassing experiences, while software enables schools to permanently record students' emotional disclosures. SEL advocates insist on injecting psychological interventions into every subject, claiming children cannot learn until their social-emotional needs are met. Math classes are transformed into feeling sessions with kindergarten-level problems where "everyone belongs" and there are "no wrong answers." One presenter proudly declared, "I can't think of a content area that needs more social-emotional learning than mathematics." The proliferation of classroom "shadows" (private aides) has expanded beyond helping children with severe disabilities to supporting neurotypical children for almost any reason-making friends, sitting still, or general "success." These shadows create dependency rather than self-sufficiency, constantly prompting children about social interactions and behaviors. Academic accommodations have expanded far beyond their original purpose, with school counselors advocating for excusing lateness, forgiving missed work, allowing mid-class walks, inflating grades, and reducing homework-often without requiring an official diagnosis. Students exploit vague mental health claims to avoid academic responsibilities, while teachers who oppose these accommodations face resistance from school counselors. Following Obama's 2014 Dear Colleague Letter threatening schools with funding loss for disproportionate minority suspensions, "restorative justice" replaced traditional discipline. This approach reframes bad behavior as "cries for help" and uses "restorative circles" where victims and bullies sit together sharing feelings. Teachers report this system revictimizes the bullied while failing to curb violence.

6장

The Trauma Industry: Manufacturing Victims

The concept of "trauma" has become extraordinarily ubiquitous in modern education, reaching nearly mythological proportions. At one notable education conference, a consultant used the word "trauma" 105 times in a single hour, demonstrating how this terminology has infiltrated educational discourse. Schools increasingly operate under the assumption that all children have experienced "adverse childhood experiences" (ACEs), implementing widespread mental health interventions. This approach persists despite explicit warnings from Dr. Vincent Felitti, the original ACE study's author, who emphasized that the research was designed for population-level analysis rather than individual diagnosis or treatment protocols. The commercialization of trauma theory has found its apex in bestselling books like Bessel van der Kolk's "The Body Keeps the Score," which has sold over three million copies and spawned countless derivative works. The book's central thesis - that the body physically stores childhood traumas - has become accepted wisdom among many practitioners. Van der Kolk argues that these stored traumas manifest in a striking array of conditions: autoimmune disorders, anxiety, depression, ADHD, asthma, migraines, fibromyalgia, and even cancer. However, these sweeping claims rest on remarkably thin evidence, including PET scans of just eight subjects recalling traumatic memories, from which van der Kolk drew broad conclusions about trauma's effects on the amygdala and Broca's area. The allure of trauma theory lies partly in its message of absolution: "It's not your fault. Trauma made you this way." This narrative provides a secular form of forgiveness, encouraging individuals who've never experienced severe trauma to retrospectively reframe ordinary life disappointments as results of childhood "wounds." Van der Kolk's influence extends back to the 1990s, when he served as a chief architect of repressed memory theory, providing expert testimony in numerous cases that later resulted in false convictions. Notably, he has never publicly disavowed this discredited theory despite overwhelming evidence against it. Harvard psychology professor Richard McNally's assessment is particularly damning, comparing repressed memory therapy to the lobotomy era in terms of damage to mental health practice. Despite being thoroughly debunked by prominent researchers like Elizabeth Loftus, who demonstrated the malleability of memory, and Harrison Pope and Paul McHugh, who exposed the lack of scientific evidence, these theories continue to shape therapeutic approaches and popular understanding. The methodological problems plaguing trauma theory research are extensive. Dr. Pope illustrates these issues with a pointed analogy about 19th-century masturbation studies: if Victorian doctors diagnosed "masturbation-induced mental illness," modern researchers would likely find brain differences in the "ill" group - not because masturbation caused illness, but due to selection bias in subject choice. This same problem of reverse causation and confirmation bias plagues much modern trauma research. Distinguished neurobiology professor James McGaugh provides perhaps the most decisive criticism of current trauma theory applications. He emphasizes the fundamental neuroscientific distinction between sudden shock trauma (as experienced in combat) and sustained childhood adversity. "It's a mistake, if not dishonest," he argues, "to make neuroscientific claims about kids who suffered a bad childhood based on our work with soldiers who survived a discrete and sudden shock." This conflation of different types of adverse experiences represents a serious misapplication of trauma research.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

나쁜 치료의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

7장

When Parents Surrender Authority: The Gentle Parenting Trap

The author's generation, shaped by experiences of divorce and minimal parental supervision in the 1970s and 1980s, entered parenthood with a fierce determination to do things differently. They wholesale rejected traditional disciplinary methods like spanking, stern voices, and allowing children to roam unsupervised. Instead, they embraced a gentler, therapy-inspired approach characterized by soft voices, physical positioning at children's eye level, and an almost obsessive focus on emotional validation and feedback loops. This profound parental insecurity manifests in countless daily interactions. Parents constantly poll their children about activities - "Are you having fun?" "Is this okay?" "Would you prefer something else?" - replacing natural parenting instincts with clinical therapeutic language borrowed from counseling sessions. Modern parents spend nearly triple the time with their children compared to the 1960s, yet the outcomes are increasingly troubling: rising rates of anxiety and depression among youth, teenagers who self-isolate in their rooms, young adults avoiding traditional milestones of dating and marriage, and an alarming increase in prescription medications for behavioral and emotional issues. The contrast with America's previous parenting paradigm is stark. Earlier generations embraced a more straightforward, often masculine approach epitomized by phrases like "knock it off" and "shake it off." When children came running with complaints about playground disputes, parents typically responded with "Work it out yourselves." Minor injuries were met with "You'll live" - not out of callousness, but from a deep-seated belief that children needed to develop resilience through experience. This approach didn't waste time over-explaining situations but instead credited children with either having common sense or needing to develop it through natural consequences. Today's gentle parenting approach has left many parents effectively powerless when confronted with serious misbehavior. They avoid the word "no" as if it were toxic, consider traditional time-outs a form of abandonment trauma, and respond to aggressive behavior with preference statements rather than clear correction: "I don't like it when you hit me" instead of "Stop hitting - it's wrong." Highly educated parents invest considerable time and resources creating elaborate "calming corners" with sensory toys and "apology chores" while their children continue to throw violent tantrums, destroy household property, and physically assault family members. The therapeutic parenting movement has created a new category of "sensitive child" - one who supposedly experiences emotions and sensations more intensely than others and requires constant environmental adjustments. This flattering designation often prevents parents from implementing necessary discipline, believing their child is too delicate for normal correction or boundaries. Neuropsychologist Rita Eichenstein notes a troubling pattern: parents who continuously accommodate these "sensitivities" often inadvertently reinforce and expand them by creating increasingly controlled, frictionless environments that leave children ill-equipped for real-world challenges. The long-term consequences of boundary-free parenting become more apparent as children age. What begins as bossy behavior in toddlerhood evolves into alarming levels of entitlement by elementary school. These children often issue commands to adults with no awareness of social hierarchy or appropriate boundaries. Parenting coach Rebecah Freeling emphasizes that entitled behavior that merely seems cute at age three becomes deeply problematic by ages seven to nine, and can develop into dangerous patterns during the teenage years, particularly regarding risk-taking behaviors and respect for authority. The collision between boundary-free parenting and structured environments like schools creates inevitable conflicts. Teachers, struggling to maintain order while managing increasingly disruptive students, often suggest professional evaluations - typically code for considering medication. Parents, though initially resistant to the idea of "medicating" their children, frequently find themselves acquiescing when their gentle parenting techniques prove insufficient for managing serious behavioral issues. This creates a troubling cycle where medication becomes a substitute for traditional boundary-setting and discipline.

8장

Breaking Free: Reclaiming Childhood and Parental Authority

Independence is the antidote to adolescent anxiety, a truth increasingly supported by research and real-world examples. Lenore Skenazy's Let Grow movement has documented numerous cases where children who were given freedom to explore and take calculated risks developed remarkable self-reliance. Research by Peter Gray demonstrates that unsupervised play serves multiple developmental functions: it helps children learn risk assessment, develops problem-solving skills, and builds social competence. His studies show that children who regularly engage in free play show significantly lower rates of anxiety and depression in later years. Japan's approach to childhood independence offers a striking contrast to Western helicopter parenting. From age six or seven, Japanese children commonly run errands to local shops, take younger siblings to school, and navigate complex urban transit systems alone. This independence is supported by thoughtful urban design - neighborhoods feature clear landmarks, well-marked paths, and community spaces designed for children. Japanese playgrounds intentionally incorporate elements that Western parents might consider hazardous: high climbing structures, fast slides, and natural features like streams and rock formations. These environments teach children to gauge risk and trust their judgment. The Great Depression's natural experiment in childhood resilience provides compelling historical evidence. The landmark Oakland Growth Study followed 167 children through the 1930s and into adulthood. Middle-class children who took on adult responsibilities - from after-school jobs to managing household budgets - showed remarkable psychological advantages. They developed stronger executive function skills, better emotional regulation, and more robust coping mechanisms. By age 40, these individuals reported higher life satisfaction and showed better stress management than peers who had been either completely sheltered or overwhelmed by poverty. Modern parenting culture has become increasingly somber and anxiety-ridden. Parenting books emphasize constant vigilance and intervention, treating every childhood moment as critical to development. This approach contradicts psychological research showing that humor and playfulness are essential coping mechanisms. Viktor Frankl's observations from concentration camps demonstrate that humor isn't just entertainment - it's a crucial psychological defense mechanism that helps maintain perspective in difficult circumstances. The erosion of extended family networks has deprived children of valuable developmental resources. Traditional family structures provided multiple adult role models, varied attachment relationships, and natural opportunities for independence. The Harvard Grant Study's longitudinal research reveals that individuals who maintained strong extended family connections showed greater emotional resilience, better relationship skills, and higher career achievement. These benefits stemmed from exposure to diverse adult personalities, family stories of overcoming adversity, and the security of belonging to a larger social network. Parents should resist the urge to orchestrate every aspect of their children's lives. Natural consequences, peer conflicts, and minor failures build essential coping skills. Frankl's architectural metaphor about strengthening decrepit arches through increased load perfectly illustrates how moderate stress builds resilience. Children need opportunities to face and overcome challenges without immediate parental intervention. The author emphasizes that effective parenting isn't about following expert systems or maximizing achievement metrics. It's about creating conditions where children can develop naturally, with appropriate freedom and responsibility. Parents' deep emotional investment in their children's future makes them uniquely qualified to make decisions about their upbringing. The key is to trust parental instincts over professional opinions that often reflect current trends rather than timeless wisdom. Her conclusion advocates for a return to fundamentals: reduce screen time, minimize hovering, question the rush to medication, and resist the pathologization of normal childhood behavior. Parents must reclaim their authority from a system that too often undermines their natural role as primary caregivers and decision-makers in their children's lives.

★★★★★

나쁜 치료 완독을 축하합니다

100만 명 이상의 학습자가 사랑합니다

“23일째 매일 사용하고 있어요. 이제 제 일상의 한 부분이 되었습니다.”

jayallen

나쁜 치료의 핵심 주제

therapeutic iatrogenesis
youth mental health
medicalization of childhood
emotional overdiagnosis
learned helplessness

나쁜 치료의 명언

Therapy isn't a benign folk remedy but a powerful intervention capable of both helping and harming.
Normal emotional experiences have created a culture where temporary struggles are often pathologized into permanent conditions.
Emotions are unstable, manipulable, and often misleading.
Bad therapy follows predictable patterns that worsen rather than improve mental health.

나쁜 치료의 등장인물

Abigail ShrierAuthor and Yale Law graduate

저자 소개

애비게일 크라우저 슈라이어(Abigail Krauser Shrier)는 현대 치료 문화가 Z세대에 미치는 영향에 대해 도발적인 비판을 담은 뉴욕 타임스 베스트셀러, *나쁜 치료: 아이들이 자라지 못하는 이유(Bad Therapy: Why the Kids Aren’t Growing Up)*의 저자입니다. 예일 대학교 법학대학원을 졸업하고 화이트칼라 범죄 전문 변호사로 활동했던 슈라이어는 저널리즘으로 전향하여 맨해튼 연구소(Manhattan Institute)의 선임 연구원이자 *더 프리 프레스(The Free Press)*의 기고 편집자로 활동하고 있습니다.

그녀의 작업은 청소년에게 영향을 미치는 문화적 트렌드에 초점을 맞추고 있으며, 법률가다운 엄격함과 조사 보도를 결합합니다. 슈라이어의 전작인 돌이킬 수 없는 상처: 우리 딸들을 유혹하는 트랜스젠더 열풍(Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters) (2020)은 이코노미스트 선정 ‘올해의 책’으로 뽑혔으며, 청소년의 성전환에 관한 국제적인 논쟁을 불러일으켰습니다.

그녀의 통찰은 월스트리트 저널과 뉴스위크 같은 주요 매체에 게재되고 있으며, 서브스택 뉴스레터인 *더 트루스 페어리(The Truth Fairy)*를 운영하고 있습니다. 저널리즘 부문에서 바바라 올슨 상(Barbara Olson Award)을 수상한 슈라이어의 저서들은 20개 이상의 언어로 번역되었으며, 나쁜 치료는 NPR 선정 ‘2024년 최고의 책’으로 이름을 올렸습니다.

나쁜 치료 요약 다운로드

나쁜 치료 요약을 무료 PDF 또는 EPUB으로 받으세요. 인쇄하거나 오프라인에서 언제든 읽을 수 있습니다.

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

Psychobabble

Stephen Briers

The Coddling of the American Mind

Greg Lukianoff & Jonathan Haidt

This Book Will Change Your Mind About Mental Health

Nathan Filer

Shrinks

Jeffrey A. Lieberman & Ogi Ogas

Power of Bad

John Tierney

Little Treatments, Big Effects

Jessica Schleider

The Good News About Bad Behavior

Katherine Reynolds Lewis

Moody Bitches

Julie Holland

이 책에 대한 FAQ

더 알아보기

학습 계획

Be a Better Parent

This learning plan is designed for parents who want to move beyond reactive parenting and build deeper, more effective relationships with their children. Whether you're a new parent seeking foundational knowledge or an experienced parent looking to refine your approach during challenging phases, this plan provides science-backed strategies and practical tools. It's especially valuable for parents who feel overwhelmed by behavioral challenges, struggle with communication, or want to raise emotionally healthy and independent children.

5 h 18 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Build Resilience in People-Pleasing Kids

This plan is essential for parents who notice their children prioritizing others' happiness at the expense of their own well-being. It provides a roadmap for transforming submissive behaviors into confident self-advocacy, making it ideal for families seeking to raise emotionally secure and resilient individuals.

5 h 5 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Unshakable: Stoic Drills for Modern Chaos

In an era of constant digital noise and social volatility, emotional resilience is a survival skill. This plan is designed for high-stress professionals and individuals seeking to regain control over their reactions and mental clarity through practical, ancient wisdom.

2 h 30 m•5 섹션

학습 계획

Taming the Toddler Storm

This plan is essential for parents and caregivers struggling with the daily challenges of toddler behavior and emotional volatility. It provides a science-based approach to transforming outbursts into opportunities for connection and long-term skill building.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Heal my relationship with my kids

This plan is designed for parents seeking to move past reactive patterns and deep-seated conflicts to build a healthier bond with their children. It is ideal for those who want to combine self-reflection with practical attachment strategies to foster lifelong trust and connection.

6 h 11 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Great parent

Parenting is one of life's most important roles, yet few of us receive formal training in child development, emotional intelligence, or effective communication strategies. This learning plan is essential for parents, caregivers, and guardians who want to move beyond reactive parenting to build secure, confident, and emotionally resilient children through science-backed approaches and mindful practices.

4 h 23 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Unshakable: The Art of Emotional Detachment

In an era of constant social pressure, mastering emotional boundaries is essential for mental clarity. This plan is designed for individuals who feel drained by others' moods or struggle with social overthinking.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Heal from emotionally unavailable parenting

This plan is designed for adults who grew up with emotionally distant or immature caregivers and struggle with self-worth or relationship patterns. It provides a structured path to move from survival-based coping mechanisms to a life of secure attachment and authentic connection.

4 h 3 m•4 섹션

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

지금 바로 학습 여정을 시작하세요

7장

나쁜 치료

개요나쁜 치료 개요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

The Therapy Trap: How Mental Health Culture Is Making Us Sicker

When Healers Harm: The Dangers of Unnecessary Therapy

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Paradox: More Treatment, Worse Outcomes

Ten Steps to Bad Therapy: How We're Making Kids Worse

나쁜 치료에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The School Therapy Machine: When Education Becomes Treatment

The Trauma Industry: Manufacturing Victims

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

When Parents Surrender Authority: The Gentle Parenting Trap

Breaking Free: Reclaiming Childhood and Parental Authority

나쁜 치료 완독을 축하합니다

나쁜 치료의 핵심 주제

나쁜 치료의 명언

나쁜 치료의 등장인물

저자 소개

나쁜 치료 요약 다운로드

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

이 책에 대한 FAQ

What is Bad Therapy: Why the Kids Aren't Growing Up about?

Who should read Bad Therapy: Why the Kids Aren't Growing Up?

Is Bad Therapy worth reading?

What are the main arguments in Bad Therapy?

더 알아보기

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

The Therapy Trap: How Mental Health Culture Is Making Us Sicker

When Healers Harm: The Dangers of Unnecessary Therapy

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

The Paradox: More Treatment, Worse Outcomes

Ten Steps to Bad Therapy: How We're Making Kids Worse

나쁜 치료에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The School Therapy Machine: When Education Becomes Treatment

The Trauma Industry: Manufacturing Victims

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

When Parents Surrender Authority: The Gentle Parenting Trap

Breaking Free: Reclaiming Childhood and Parental Authority

나쁜 치료 완독을 축하합니다

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

더 알아보기

나쁜 치료 개요