What is *Attention Span* by Gloria Mark about?

*Attention Span* by Gloria Mark challenges the myth of sustained focus, arguing that multitasking and shifting attention types—like focused, rote, or relaxed states—are natural and beneficial. Drawing on decades of research, Mark explains how kinetic attention (strategic switching between modes) boosts productivity while preventing burnout in our distraction-filled world.

Who should read *Attention Span* by Gloria Mark?

This book is ideal for professionals, educators, and anyone struggling with digital distractions. It offers evidence-based strategies for optimizing attention cycles, making it valuable for remote workers, students, or individuals seeking to balance productivity with mental well-being in tech-driven environments.

Is *Attention Span* by Gloria Mark worth reading?

Yes—it provides a science-backed alternative to traditional productivity advice. Mark’s insights on kinetic attention and practical tips for managing interruptions make it a fresh take on thriving in the digital age. However, some readers critique its structure as disorganized.

What is kinetic attention in *Attention Span*?

Kinetic attention refers to intentionally shifting between four attention states: **focused** (deep work), **rote** (automatic tasks), **frustrated** (task-switching), and **bored** (mental rest). Mark argues this dynamic balance enhances creativity and reduces cognitive fatigue compared to forced concentration.

What are the main ideas in *Attention Span*?

Key ideas include: - Attention spans naturally fluctuate (avg. 47 seconds per screen). - Distractions aren’t inherently harmful if managed strategically. - “Flow states” are overrated; kinetic attention is more sustainable. - Digital tools fragment focus but can be optimized with mindfulness.

How does *Attention Span* suggest improving focus?

Mark recommends: - Scheduling tasks around natural attention cycles (e.g., complex work post-break). - Using mindfulness to notice distraction triggers. - Embracing “boredom breaks” to reset mental energy. - Grouping interruptions instead of addressing them immediately.

What critiques exist about *Attention Span*?

Some readers find the book’s structure disjointed, blending research with anecdotal advice. Others argue it downplays systemic workplace factors causing distraction. A minority feel the tips are too similar to existing productivity guides.

How does *Attention Span* compare to *Deep Work* by Cal Newport?

While *Deep Work* prioritizes uninterrupted focus, *Attention Span* argues for flexible attention cycling. Mark critiques Newport’s approach as unrealistic for most modern roles, advocating instead for adaptive strategies that acknowledge inevitable distractions.

「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する

グロリア・マーク

3.51(1608 Reviews)

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』の概要

『Attention Span』の中で、著名な心理学者グロリア・マークは、私たちの「集中力」に対する理解に一石を投じています。一般的な通説に反して、彼女の研究はFacebookのユーザーが予想よりも高い幸福度を報告していることを明らかにしました。カル・ニューポートが彼女を「気散りに関する決定的なエキスパート」と呼ぶ理由、そして絶え間ない集中が実はあなたの足を引っ張っているかもしれない理由を探ってみましょう。

語り方を選ぶ

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学するの同じアイデアを、あなたに合う声・深さ・ペースで学べます。いつでも切り替えられます。

第1章

The Digital Age's Attention Crisis: How We Lost Our Focus

In a world where the average person spends just 47 seconds on any screen before switching to something else, Gloria Mark's groundbreaking research couldn't be more timely. "Attention Span" has quickly become essential reading for anyone struggling with digital distraction-from tech executives at Google and Microsoft to everyday knowledge workers drowning in notifications. As a scientist who has tracked our collective attention for over two decades, Mark offers something rare: not just another productivity manual, but a deeply researched exploration of why our relationship with technology has become so problematic. With Bill Gates naming it one of his top books of 2023 and countless readers finding validation in its pages, "Attention Span" has struck a nerve in our increasingly fragmented digital culture.

第2章

Our Fragmented Digital Minds

We've developed unbreakable bonds with our devices, creating a pattern where we constantly switch attention between apps, screens, and devices. This isn't just a matter of poor discipline-it's a fundamental shift in how our minds operate in the digital age. As a research scientist tracking attention for twenty years, Gloria Mark has observed how our collective ability to focus has dramatically changed. We now spend much of our waking hours in what she calls the "digital world," developing new habits that often leave us feeling out of control. This creates several paradoxes: technology designed to augment our capabilities leaves us distracted and exhausted; managers expect immediate responses while demanding productivity; and the internet's structure, while mirroring our associative memory, encourages endless surfing. Multitasking carries significant costs: the switch cost of reorienting to new tasks, emotional costs of anxiety and stress, and depletion of our limited cognitive resources. Research shows we typically spend twenty-five minutes on other tasks before returning to interrupted work. Studies where email was cut off for a week revealed people focused longer, switched attention less frequently, and showed measurably reduced stress via heart rate monitoring. Four modern myths about attention persist: First, that we should always strive to be focused (in reality, attention naturally ebbs and flows); Second, that flow is the ideal state (though rare for most knowledge workers); Third, that distractions stem primarily from notifications and lack of discipline (ignoring environmental, social, and technological forces); Fourth, that mindless activity has no value (when it actually helps replenish cognitive resources). Instead of optimizing for ceaseless productivity, we should adjust our lives for balance, maintaining positive cognitive resources. Attention isn't binary but nuanced-focus works best when balanced with other forms of attention that tax our resources less.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』の一語一語が音声に合わせてリアルタイムでハイライトされ、自然に読み進められます。

第3章

The Science of Attention: How Our Minds Process Information

To understand our rapidly shifting attention on digital devices, we must examine the psychological processes behind our behaviors. William James, psychology's founding father, defined attention as focusing consciousness on one object among many possibilities, believing we control what shapes our experience through selective attention. Modern science reveals attention isn't centralized but comprises different brain networks-alerting (maintaining vigilance), orienting (selecting stimuli), and executive control (managing interference)-all working together like an orchestra. When we use our devices, these systems become overtaxed as we battle constant visual cues and the temptation of unlimited information access. Our minds operate with a finite pool of cognitive resources that deplete as we use them throughout the day. This well-established psychological theory explains why by afternoon, after managing emails, texts, meetings, and resisting distractions, we feel drained and turn to social media for relief. Like spending cash until only pennies remain, we allocate our attentional resources across activities until they're nearly gone. Neuroscience confirms this through blood flow measurements-sustained focus increases carbon dioxide in active brain regions, and as we maintain focus, blood velocity decreases, indicating resource depletion. We need breaks to replenish these resources through sleep, nature exposure, psychological detachment, or even simple games. In everyday life, we don't just fluctuate between focus and distraction on one task-we rapidly shift between different screens, apps, and activities. This dynamic, energetic switching pattern represents what Mark calls "kinetic attention"-a vigorous, motion-filled state characterized by rapid shifts between applications, websites, and devices. Kinetic attention isn't inherently good or bad, but research shows we generally aren't skilled at utilizing it effectively, resulting in stress, fatigue, poor performance and burnout because such rapid switching depletes our cognitive resources.

第4章

The Constant Battle for Your Attention

People frequently struggle with controlling their attention in our device-filled world, often feeling mentally drained from constant digital bombardment. This happens because much of our attention operates automatically through well-learned responses that require minimal effort, like answering phones or checking email notifications. This automatic (exogenous) attention is stimulus-driven and difficult to inhibit, as demonstrated by the classic Stroop test where reading words interferes with naming colors. Our devices constantly challenge us to resist these automatic responses. Research shows that maintaining cognitive control over extended periods gradually breaks down our resistance to distractions, leading to more impulsive choices as brain activity in regions related to working memory and task-switching diminishes-a phenomenon called cognitive fatigue. People commonly fall into behavioral patterns-attention traps-where they lose control of their attention when using devices. These include: 1. The attention-wandering trap: Our attention naturally wanders between external stimuli and internal thoughts. When using devices, browser tabs and apps provide triggers that lead our minds astray. While mind-wandering isn't inherently bad and can spark creativity, excessive internet meandering can steal time from important tasks. 2. The rote attention trap: Simple, repetitive digital activities like playing Candy Crush or browsing social media lightly engage our attention and can help us replenish attentional resources. However, we often misjudge how much time we'll spend on these activities. The emotional rewards keep us engaged through intermittent reinforcement, where rewards come occasionally rather than consistently. 3. The social media trap: Social media captures our attention because we're inherently social beings craving connection. The intermittent conditioning from social rewards (like Facebook likes) functions as a powerful hook, increasing our sense of social worth. We keep posting hoping for likes, just as we keep scrolling TikTok knowing eventually we'll find something entertaining. 4. The identity trap: Many people spend considerable attention designing and maintaining their online personas. For some, their social media persona becomes more important than their real-world identity, with followers and likes serving as validation. Because we naturally want to present ourselves in the best possible light, maintaining these carefully constructed personas can consume significant attention. 5. The sunk cost trap: We often continue digital activities because we've already invested so much time that stopping feels wasteful. After reading an article for thirty minutes and realizing it's not valuable, we might continue hoping for a worthwhile ending rather than accepting the lost time. Choosing where to focus our attention is essentially allocating limited resources. While traditional models suggest these choices are governed by individual preferences, priorities, and resource needs, this view is incomplete. We're embedded in social, cultural, and technical environments that profoundly influence our attention. Our attention choices reflect not just individual factors but the complex interplay between our internal preferences and the broader social and technical world we inhabit.

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第5章

The Four States of Attention

Our attention is far more nuanced than simply being focused or unfocused. From John Locke's early observations to William James's distinctions between controlled attention and scattered states, thinkers have long recognized different attentional modes. But our digital age demands a new framework for understanding attention. Working at Microsoft Research, Mark and her colleagues discovered that engagement alone wasn't sufficient to describe attention-the challenge level of activities also mattered significantly. They developed a framework with two dimensions: engagement and challenge. Unlike flow theory, they found people could be engaged in activities with varying degrees of mental effort and cognitive resource demands. This framework identifies four distinct attentional states: 1. Focus: When people are highly engaged and highly challenged, they enter a state of focus. This represents absorption in an activity that requires significant mental effort. Being focused correlates with motivation, concentration, creativity and satisfaction. Though not identical to flow, focus can be considered a precondition to flow. As the phrase "paying attention" suggests, maintaining focus costs considerable cognitive resources. 2. Rote: Rote attention occurs when people are highly engaged but not challenged. This mechanical, routine attention absorbs us without requiring mental effort-like playing solitaire or Candy Crush. Because rote activities aren't challenging, they use fewer cognitive resources, explaining why people can engage in them for extended periods without feeling depleted. 3. Bored: When neither engagement nor challenge is present, we experience boredom. This might manifest as aimlessly surfing the internet or flipping through TV channels without interest. Boredom underuses available cognitive resources and creates low arousal, making concentration difficult. Unlike flow where time awareness diminishes, during boredom we're hyperaware of time's slow passage. 4. Frustrated: Frustration occurs when we're highly challenged but not engaged. This happens when we struggle with difficult tasks we can't abandon-perhaps due to deadlines, managerial requirements, or inner compulsion. This state consumes substantial cognitive resources despite our disengagement. Attention follows natural rhythms, just as our bodies do with circadian cycles, metabolism, and hormone fluctuations. Research shows that alertness and selective attention vary throughout the day, influenced by circadian rhythms and homeostatic processes. Focus peaks at 11am and 3pm, with people needing time to "power up" in the morning and after lunch before gradually declining after 3pm. Rote attention rises from 9am until 2pm before declining, while boredom peaks around 1pm post-lunch. Rather than viewing distractions as external forces that break focus, research reveals that certain attentional states make people more susceptible to distractions. When people are bored or engaged in rote activities, they're more likely to switch their attention to Facebook or face-to-face interactions. Without strong goal-directed attention, our focus becomes "like a reed in the wind." While flow might seem ideal, it's rarely achievable in typical knowledge work. Instead of chasing this elusive state, we should aim for balanced attentional rhythms. Rather than striving for constant focus, we should recognize our cognitive ebbs and flows, purposefully shifting between different attentional states to maintain balance.

第6章

The Multitasking Myth: How We Fragment Our Attention

Multitasking isn't new-our ancestors multitasked for survival 1.5 million years ago. Today, despite no longer needing to constantly scan for predators, we still struggle to focus deeply. People fall on a continuum between monochronic (preferring to complete one task before starting another) and polychronic (preferring to juggle multiple tasks). True multitasking is rarely possible-what we're actually doing is rapidly switching attention between activities. This works only when at least one activity requires minimal cognitive resources. When activities demand full attention, performance suffers significantly. While occasional attention-switching can be beneficial for refreshing cognitive resources or breaking negative thought patterns, excessive rapid switching depletes our mental capacity and increases stress. To study attention in real-world environments, Mark created "living laboratories" where researchers shadowed knowledge workers with stopwatches, timing precisely how long they spent on activities before switching. This painstaking data collection revealed people in workplaces averaged only three minutes, five seconds on any activity before switching, with computer attention spans even shorter at two and a half minutes. As sensor technologies evolved, more sophisticated tracking methods using heart rate monitors, actigraphs, and precise computer logging measured attention spans in real-world settings. The results were striking: average attention duration on screens has declined dramatically from 150 seconds in 2004 to just 47 seconds in recent years. This pattern holds true across all job types from managers to software developers. Though our attention on any screen has stabilized at about forty-seven seconds, the problem extends beyond low-level task switching. Even when considering higher-level "working spheres" (distinct projects or areas of responsibility), our focus remains fragmented. Studies show people manage about twelve working spheres daily, spending just ten and a half minutes on each before switching. When interrupted, it takes an average of twenty-five minutes and twenty-six seconds to return to the original task, with people working on an average of 2.26 intervening tasks before returning to their interrupted work. Despite some people's belief that multitasking boosts productivity, evidence consistently shows the opposite. As early as 1927, psychologist Arthur T. Jersild demonstrated that task-switching slows performance and increases errors. Beyond reduced productivity, multitasking creates "attention residue" from previous tasks that interferes with current work. Laboratory and real-world studies consistently link multitasking with higher stress markers, including decreased immunoglobulin A, higher blood pressure, and greater perceived mental workload. In our digital culture, multitasking has become normalized from very young ages. Though it increases physiological stress, fragments work, drains cognitive resources, and harms productivity, multitasking feels unavoidable in our polychronic world. For knowledge workers especially, monochronic work styles seem increasingly like a luxury-we multitask because falling behind feels like the alternative.

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

第7章

The Hidden Forces Shaping Our Attention

The psychological pull of internet distractions is so powerful that some professionals resort to extreme measures-like one doctor who purchased round-trip plane tickets just to write without internet access. While interruptions can sometimes offer beneficial mental breaks or social connections, their costs are well-documented. Bluma Zeigarnik's groundbreaking research discovered what became known as the Zeigarnik effect-we remember interrupted tasks better than completed ones. Her 1927 experiments showed that interrupted tasks create a state of tension from the unsatisfied need to finish, which persists in our memory. According to Kurt Lewin's field theory, unfulfilled needs create tension that's released only when goals are completed. This theory explains why interrupted tasks linger in our minds-the memory "sizzles on the back burner" until resolution. Surprisingly, people self-interrupt nearly as often as they're interrupted by external factors. These internal interruptions stem from thoughts, memories, or habits that pull us away from tasks without any external trigger. We may not even recognize how frequently this happens-suddenly checking email or searching for unrelated information based on random thoughts. Self-interruption patterns can form quickly-taking anywhere from 18 to 254 days to become habits. Email has evolved from an occasional pleasure to a constant interruption. Studies tracking computer activity revealed people check their email an astonishing 74-77 times daily on average, with one dedicated individual checking 374 times daily. Most participants (41%) self-interrupted to check email rather than responding to notifications. Beyond email, Facebook users averaged 38 daily visits-with one person checking 264 times-typically in brief 18-second "snacks" of social media consumption. In a groundbreaking experiment at a scientific research organization, Mark eliminated email access for participants for a full workweek while monitoring their stress levels via heart rate variability. The results were striking: without email, participants maintained significantly longer attention spans while working on computers and experienced measurably less stress by week's end. Participants described email as "ruining my life" and "interfering with happiness," while the email-free experience felt "freeing," "liberating," and allowed working at "a human pace." The internet's design itself contributes significantly to our wandering attention. Its node-link structure deliberately mimics our natural mental organization of associative thinking. When we surf the internet, our attention often shifts from goal-directed searching to following associations through clicks, setting our minds on unexpected paths. This internet browsing parallels mind-wandering-both lack rigid goals, allow free conceptual exploration, and often occur without awareness that our thoughts have meandered. The internet provides countless entry points that prime our mental networks. When browsing topics like the Winter Olympics, related concepts like ice-skating and ski jumping spring to mind, making contextually relevant links attract our attention "like a neon sign." Priming can trigger automatic responses without conscious choice-advertisers leverage this by exposing us to brand names that later influence our product choices.

第8章

The Social and Technological Forces Hijacking Our Focus

What can algorithms infer about you from your digital footprints? Far more than you realize. Digital phenotyping-analyzing your online behavior-reveals your emotional state and personality with impressive accuracy. Researchers found that linguistic patterns in social media posts correlate strongly with subjective well-being; using "I" frequently indicates negative feelings. Even minimal data like Facebook likes can predict personality traits better than your significant other after analyzing just 300 likes. Companies leverage this knowledge to target ads based on your psychological profile-showing fear-inducing insurance ads to neurotics or party cruises to extroverts. Your smartphone tracks physical activity, location, ambient sound, and usage patterns, all revealing your personality traits. These insights feed algorithms designed to capture your attention by presenting precisely what will interest you most, keeping you engaged on platforms longer. Algorithms exploit our fundamental human instincts, particularly our social curiosity. When we receive notifications about friends' posts, we're compelled to investigate. Many algorithms deliberately trigger lower-order emotions-happiness, surprise, fear, disgust, anger-which demand our attention automatically, without cognitive processing. This makes us particularly vulnerable when our attentional resources are depleted. TikTok's sophisticated recommender engine creates an attention trap through meticulous data collection about both videos and users. The algorithm creates a feedback loop: observe, tweak, present another video, repeat. TikTok videos captivate attention by mimicking condensed film structure-introduction, tension, and climax-often with surprise endings packed into fifteen seconds. This triggers operant conditioning: when videos make you laugh, that positive reinforcement strengthens your behavior to keep watching. Our broader media environment fundamentally shapes our attention patterns beyond just computers and phones. Film and television shot lengths have dramatically shortened over decades-from twelve seconds in 1930s films to less than four seconds by 2010. Music videos feature even briefer shots, averaging just 1.6 seconds. These rapid visual transitions condition viewers to expect quick changes, potentially influencing how we interact with our personal devices. Social influence can override rational judgment in our digital interactions. Digital traces signal others' presence-posts, comments, even the "inner reading voice" 81% of people report hearing when reading text. Young people are particularly vulnerable to social influence, with the brain's reward center showing heightened activation when viewing Instagram photos with many likes versus few. This activation peaks around ages 16-17. We invest significant attention in constructing our online personas, performing on the internet as Shakespeare's "stage." While we manage impressions in face-to-face settings through clothing and social choices, online impression management can lead to exaggeration, with studies showing people unknowingly inflate their self-importance in Facebook updates. We must navigate "context collapse" where different social groups (colleagues on LinkedIn, family on Instagram) see our posts, requiring multiple carefully maintained identities-a rewarding but time-consuming endeavor.

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』をもっと深く楽しむ

毎日の新しい気づきを10万件以上のレッスンから
言葉をハイライトして音声と同期
ライブラリを保存して、どの端末からでも利用

第9章

Reclaiming Your Attention in the Digital Age

While we can't blame algorithms alone for our attention problems, we can develop agency in the digital world by understanding how underlying factors constrain our attention in complex ways. By reframing our goal from achieving absolute free will to developing agency, we can become aware of our conditioning and take control of our behaviors even when we can't control our desires. We need to shift from maximizing productivity with our devices to maintaining psychological balance while still achieving our aims. Psychological balance means achieving homeostasis between the parasympathetic ("rest and digest") and sympathetic (fight-or-flight) nervous systems. Multitasking and constant interruptions create stress through sympathetic dominance, leading to health problems. When our nervous system is balanced, we experience positive emotions that enhance creativity and problem-solving. Applying Bandura's four properties of agency can help us control our attention in the digital world: 1. Meta-awareness means observing your digital behavior like an outsider would, bringing habitual actions to a conscious level. By asking yourself questions like "What value will I gain?" or "How much time have I spent here?", you switch from passive to active attention management. With practice, meta-awareness becomes natural-like developing a muscle-helping you avoid rabbit holes and sunk cost attention traps. 2. Forethought means visualizing how your current digital actions will affect your future. Before indulging in social media or games, imagine the consequences hours later-will you see a finished presentation or be staying up late making up for lost time? The more detailed your visualization, including anticipated emotions, the easier it becomes to course-correct. 3. Self-regulation can be developed through: - Restructuring your digital environment to reduce stimuli that trigger automatic attention - Creating "hooks" that pull you out of potential attention traps - Resisting the initial temptation to switch screens-it's easier to not start than to pull yourself out once engaged 4. Self-reflection enables course correction to achieve attention control and balance. Instead of mindlessly scrolling social media, leverage these platforms intentionally to connect meaningfully with individuals who make you happy. Traditional day scheduling focuses on listing tasks, meetings and deadlines to maximize productivity, often causing stress. In our digital world, we need to relearn day design to include strategies for well-being, understanding our rhythm of attentional states and limited cognitive resources. Design your day with awareness of your limited mental resources, understanding which activities drain them and which replenish them. Include "negative space"-intentional breaks surrounding hard work that allow you to reset and boost attention capacity. Instead of forcing yourself into marathon sessions of focus, strive for psychological balance by following your natural attentional rhythm. The narrative that we shouldn't allow mindless activities isn't based in science-rote activities like gardening, knitting, or even certain digital activities help us relax, reset, and replenish cognitive resources. We're still in the digital world's infancy-personal computers only became widespread in the mid-1980s, the internet in the mid-1990s, and smartphones in 2007. Our understanding of healthy digital integration lags behind technological development. Yet we can be optimistic-despite notifications, conditioning, and personality factors, we still own our attention-no one can take that away. We can learn to harness our dynamic attention, sustain focus when needed, and step back when appropriate, creating a digital world in the image we want.

★★★★★

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』を最後まで読み終えました

100万人以上の学習者に愛用されています

“23日間、毎日使い続けています。今では日課の一部です。”

jayallen

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』の主要テーマ

digital distraction
cognitive resource depletion
task switching costs
kinetic attention
attentional fatigue

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』の名言

Technology designed to augment our capabilities leaves us distracted and exhausted.
Attention naturally ebbs and flows.
Mindless activity helps replenish cognitive resources.
We've developed unbreakable bonds with our devices.
Choosing where to focus our attention is essentially

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』の登場人物

Gloria MarkAuthor and research scientist tracking attention

著者について

『Attention Span: A Groundbreaking Way to Restore Balance, Happiness, Productivity』の著者であり、カリフォルニア大学アーバイン校の情報の学長教授（Chancellor’s Professor of Informatics）であるグロリア・ジャネット・マーク（Gloria Janet Mark）は、ヒューマンコンピュータインタラクションとデジタル行動における先駆的な研究者です。コロンビア大学で心理学の博士号を取得した彼女の、注意の断片化、マルチタスク、およびテクノロジーが心理に与える影響に関する数十年にわたる研究は、現代の集中力の課題を探求する本書（ノンフィクション）の骨格を成しています。

2012年よりマイクロソフトのシニア客員研究員を務めるマークは、以前にテクノロジーが飽和した環境における職場の生産性を検証した『Multitasking in the Digital Age』を執筆しています。彼女の研究成果は、『ニューヨーク・タイムズ』、『ウォール・ストリート・ジャーナル』、NPR、BBCなどで取り上げられており、SXSWやアスペン・アイデア・フェスティバルでも発表を行っています。

ヒューマンコンピュータインタラクションにおけるリーダーシップが認められ、ACM CHIアカデミーの会員に選出されたマークの仕事は、学術的な厳密さと、認知的コントロールを取り戻すための実践的な洞察を橋渡しするものです。『Attention Span』は、彼女の150本以上の査読付き論文に基づいて構成されており、デジタル・オーバーロード（情報の過負荷）を乗りこなすためのエビデンスに基づいた戦略を提示しています。本書は2023年の出版以来、幅広いメディアで報道され、テクノロジーが社会に与える影響を理解する上での第一人者としてのマークの評価を確固たるものにしました。

「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学するの要約をダウンロード

「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学するの要約をPDFまたはEPUBで無料でダウンロード。印刷やオフラインでいつでもお読みいただけます。

他のユーザーのお気に入り

The Distraction Addiction

Alex Soojung-Kim Pang

Reclaim Your Focus: Science-Based Attention Training の書籍表紙

How to Improve Your Concentration and Focus in a Distracted World

Focus Training: 5 Simple Exercises to Improve Attention and Concentration

6 sources

Reclaim Your Focus: Science-Based Attention Training

The Attention Crisis: Reclaiming Focus in a Distracted World の書籍表紙

Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World

Digital Minimalism: On Living Better with Less Technology

25 sources

The Attention Crisis: Reclaiming Focus in a Distracted World

BeFreed

The Distracted Mind

Adam Gazzaley

Focus

Daniel Goleman

Evidence-Based Techniques to Boost Focus and Productivity

6 sources

Reclaiming Your Focus: The Attention Revolution

Hyperfocus

Chris Bailey

The Mindful Focus Revolution: Breaking Free from Digital Distractions の書籍表紙

3 sources

The Mindful Focus Revolution: Breaking Free from Digital Distractions

この本に関するよくある質問

学習プラン

Focus Lab: Reclaiming Your Attention

In an era of constant digital distraction, the ability to protect your focus is a competitive advantage. This plan is designed for professionals and creatives who need to move beyond busywork to achieve high-impact, elite-level results through disciplined attention.

30 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

Improve focus and attention

In an era of constant digital distraction, the ability to control your attention is a competitive advantage. This plan is ideal for professionals and students looking to master deep work, leverage neuroscience, and build sustainable peak performance habits.

3 h 56 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

Productivity and focus

In an era of constant distraction, the ability to manage your attention is a competitive advantage. This plan is designed for professionals and students who want to move beyond busywork to achieve elite-level performance and sustainable success.

3 h 45 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

Stop Distractions & Stay on Track Daily

In an era of constant digital noise, the ability to maintain focus is a competitive advantage. This plan is designed for professionals and students who need to reclaim their attention and build sustainable systems for high-impact productivity.

3 h 52 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

Master Focus and Science-Based Habits

This learning plan is essential for professionals and students seeking to reclaim their attention in the digital age. It combines neuroscience with practical systems, making it ideal for high-performers looking to build lasting habits and superior cognitive resilience.

4 h 51 m•4 セクション

学習プラン

The Deep Work Strategy

In an era of constant digital distraction, the ability to focus deeply is a rare and valuable superpower. This plan is essential for professionals and creatives who want to increase their cognitive output and master hard skills quickly.

2 h•4 セクション

学習プラン

Finish What You Start

In an era of constant distraction, the ability to follow through on commitments is a vital competitive advantage. This plan is designed for students and professionals who struggle with starting or finishing projects and want to master the science of effective learning and focus.

1 h 30 m•3 セクション

学習プラン

The Art of Grounded Maturity

In an era of constant distraction and reactive behavior, the ability to remain grounded is a rare competitive advantage. This plan is designed for professionals and individuals seeking to transition from anxious overthinking to a state of confident, magnetic maturity.

1 h 30 m•3 セクション

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

コロンビア大学卒業生がサンフランシスコで開発

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

BeFreedがウェブ上でどのように話題になっているかをもっと見る

今すぐ学習の旅を始めよう

第9章

「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する

概要『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』の概要

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

The Digital Age's Attention Crisis: How We Lost Our Focus

Our Fragmented Digital Minds

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Science of Attention: How Our Minds Process Information

The Constant Battle for Your Attention

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Four States of Attention

The Multitasking Myth: How We Fragment Our Attention

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Hidden Forces Shaping Our Attention

The Social and Technological Forces Hijacking Our Focus

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』をもっと深く楽しむ

Reclaiming Your Attention in the Digital Age

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』を最後まで読み終えました

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』の主要テーマ

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』の名言

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』の登場人物

著者について

「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学するの要約をダウンロード

他のユーザーのお気に入り

この本に関するよくある質問

What is Attention Span by Gloria Mark about?

Who should read Attention Span by Gloria Mark?

Is Attention Span by Gloria Mark worth reading?

What is kinetic attention in Attention Span?

もっと見る

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1冊の本。さまざまな聴き方。

The Digital Age's Attention Crisis: How We Lost Our Focus

Our Fragmented Digital Minds

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Science of Attention: How Our Minds Process Information

The Constant Battle for Your Attention

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』をもっと深く楽しむ

The Four States of Attention

The Multitasking Myth: How We Fragment Our Attention

聴きながら、すべての言葉を目で追えます

The Hidden Forces Shaping Our Attention

The Social and Technological Forces Hijacking Our Focus

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』をもっと深く楽しむ

Reclaiming Your Attention in the Digital Age

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』を最後まで読み終えました

他のユーザーのお気に入り

もっと見る

『「集中力」の正体――デジタル時代の「飽き性」を科学する』の概要