Explore the theoretical divide in digital addiction research. Learn about Ivan Goldberg, Mark Griffiths, and Andrew Przybylski's perspectives for your psychology literature review.

The internet doesn't cause the problem; it provides a place for existing problems to manifest through maladaptive cognitions, shifting the focus from the technology being the villain to the user's internal map.
Create a podcast featuring the leading theorists on digital addiction drawn from academic journals. I am working on a theoretical framework for the literature review portion of my dissertation








The theoretical divide centers on whether excessive screen time should be classified as a clinical addiction or simply problematic use. While some researchers model it after substance dependence, others remain skeptical of the link between digital use and clinical pathology. This friction makes the topic a complex but valuable area for a psychology literature review, as leading theorists do not currently agree on a single definition or framework for the phenomenon.
Key figures include Ivan Goldberg, who originally sketched diagnostic criteria based on substance dependence, and Mark Griffiths of Nottingham Trent University, who supports a components model of addiction. In contrast, Andrew Przybylski from Oxford University represents a more skeptical viewpoint. These scholars represent the fragmented nature of the field, offering different perspectives ranging from clinical addiction models to skepticism regarding the evidence of harmful links.
The components model, championed by Mark Griffiths, suggests that digital addiction shares core features with traditional addictions. These features include salience, mood modification, and withdrawal symptoms. By applying this framework, researchers argue that problematic internet use can be understood through the same psychological mechanisms as other addictive behaviors. This model provides a structured way for students to analyze digital overuse within a dissertation or academic literature review.
Creato da alumni della Columbia University a San Francisco
"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."
"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."
"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."
"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."
"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."
"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."
"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."
"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."
"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"
"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."
"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."
"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"
Creato da alumni della Columbia University a San Francisco
