
In "Wild Problems," economist Russ Roberts challenges rational decision-making for life's biggest choices. When data fails, what guides us? Derek Sivers gave it 9/10, praising its revolutionary approach to self-identity. Discover why flourishing matters more than happiness in decisions that truly define us.
Feel the book through the author's voice
Turn knowledge into engaging, example-rich insights
Capture key ideas in a flash for fast learning
Enjoy the book in a fun and engaging way
Break down key ideas from Wild Problems into bite-sized takeaways to understand how innovative teams create, collaborate, and grow.
Distill Wild Problems into rapid-fire memory cues that highlight Pixar’s principles of candor, teamwork, and creative resilience.

Experience Wild Problems through vivid storytelling that turns Pixar’s innovation lessons into moments you’ll remember and apply.
Ask anything, pick the voice, and co-create insights that truly resonate with you.

From Columbia University alumni built in San Francisco

Get the Wild Problems summary as a free PDF or EPUB. Print it or read offline anytime.
We've all been there - staring at a pros and cons list for a life-changing decision, only to realize something feels fundamentally wrong with reducing our biggest choices to checkmarks on a page. This is the central insight of "Wild Problems" - that our most consequential decisions resist calculation. When Charles Darwin contemplated marriage, he created a meticulous list weighing companionship against freedom, family against career. Yet despite his list suggesting he remain single, he concluded with "Marry-Marry-Marry Q.E.D." Why? Because Darwin recognized what we all intuitively understand: life's biggest decisions aren't just about maximizing happiness or minimizing pain. They're about who we become. What makes a problem "wild" rather than "tame"? Tame problems have clear goals and objective assessment methods - like finding the fastest route between cities or baking a perfect cake. Wild problems involve subjective goals that resist measurement. Should you marry? Which career will fulfill you? How should you parent? These questions have no manual for success, and what works brilliantly for one person might fail miserably for another. The distinction matters because we often mistakenly apply tame-problem thinking to wild-problem decisions, creating an illusion of objectivity where none exists.