What is
This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things by Whitney Phillips about?
This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things explores the interplay between online trolling and mainstream culture, analyzing how trolls exploit media sensationalism and digital platforms to spread chaos. Phillips uses ethnographic research to argue that trolling isn’t isolated behavior but a reflection of broader societal norms and media dynamics.
Who should read
This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things?
This book is essential for media scholars, digital ethicists, journalists, and anyone interested in internet culture. It’s particularly valuable for understanding misinformation tactics, the ethics of online communication, and the historical roots of trolling.
What are Whitney Phillips’ credentials for writing about online trolling?
Whitney Phillips holds a PhD in English with a focus on folklore and digital culture. She’s an assistant professor at Syracuse University, a WIRED columnist, and has authored multiple award-winning books on digital ethics, including The Ambivalent Internet and You Are Here.
Is
This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things worth reading?
Yes—it’s praised as a foundational text in internet studies, offering critical insights into trolling’s cultural impact. Reviewers highlight its accessible academic style, though some critique its sympathetic lens toward trolls.
What key concepts does Phillips introduce in the book?
- Trolling as cultural practice: Examines how trolls mirror and manipulate mainstream media tropes.
- "Lulz" philosophy: Analyzes the pleasure-driven motivation behind disruptive behavior.
- Media amplification: Shows how click-driven journalism fuels trolling’s visibility.
How does
This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things address the “oxygen of amplification”?
Phillips argues that media outlets inadvertently empower trolls by sensationalizing their actions. Her 2018 Oxygen of Amplification report, cited in the book, provides guidelines for ethically reporting on extremism without amplifying harmful messages.
What is the book’s main argument about internet culture?
Phillips contends that trolling and mainstream culture are co-dependent: trolls exploit media weaknesses, while outlets profit from covering their antics. This cycle normalizes destructive behaviors and erodes digital discourse.
What are common criticisms of the book?
Some argue Phillips overly empathizes with trolls, downplaying their harm. Others note her 2015 analysis feels dated in addressing modern platforms like TikTok or AI-driven disinformation.
How has this book influenced media ethics discussions?
It’s widely taught in communication courses and cited in journalism ethics guidelines. Phillips’ work prompted outlets like The New York Times to reconsider coverage of extremist movements.
How does this book compare to Phillips’ later works like
You Are Here?
While Nice Things focuses on trolling’s origins, You Are Here (2021) addresses conspiracy theories and polarization. Both emphasize media literacy but shift from analysis to actionable strategies for navigating misinformation.
What practical advice does Phillips offer to combat trolling?
- Avoid “feeding the trolls” through disproportionate coverage.
- Prioritize context over virality when reporting.
- Support digital literacy programs to inoculate audiences.
What notable quotes appear in the book?
“Trolling is the substrate, not the aberration, of online culture.”
“Media outlets don’t just report on the lulz—they’re active participants in the cycle.”
Why is this book relevant in 2025?
With AI-generated deepfakes and algorithm-driven polarization, Phillips’ analysis of attention economies remains critical. Her frameworks help decode modern misinformation tactics rooted in early trolling culture.
What academic value does
This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things provide?
It’s a seminal text in digital media studies, frequently assigned in courses on internet culture, journalism ethics, and political communication. Its mixed-methods approach (ethnography + media analysis) is widely emulated.
What are the key takeaways from the book?
- Trolling and mainstream media reinforce each other’s worst tendencies.
- Ethical reporting requires resisting amplification of harmful content.
- Digital literacy must address systemic issues, not just individual behavior.