What is
The War on Journalism by Andrew Fowler about?
The War on Journalism investigates the decline of mainstream media, exposing how corporate greed, government surveillance, and self-censorship eroded press freedom. Andrew Fowler traces the impact of whistleblowers like Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden, while critiquing media giants like the BBC, The Washington Post, and Rupert Murdoch’s News of the World for prioritizing power over truth. The book warns of draconian laws silencing dissent and urges a reckoning for democratic accountability.
Who should read
The War on Journalism?
Journalists, media students, and advocates of press freedom will find this book essential. It’s also critical for readers interested in government transparency, corporate influence on news, and the ethical challenges facing modern journalism. Fowler’s insider perspective, drawn from decades at ABC’s Four Corners, offers valuable insights for those analyzing media’s role in democracy.
Is
The War on Journalism worth reading?
Yes—it’s a compelling expose of journalism’s crisis, blending investigative rigor with firsthand accounts. Fowler’s analysis of high-profile cases like WikiLeaks and phone-hacking scandals provides a stark warning about media consolidation and state overreach. Its relevance grows amid rising distrust in institutions and debates over “fake news”.
What are the main themes in
The War on Journalism?
- Corporate Influence: Media moguls prioritizing profit over public interest.
- Whistleblowers: How Manning and Snowden disrupted traditional journalist-source dynamics.
- Government Overreach: Laws criminalizing leaks and spying on citizens.
- Self-Censorship: Journalists avoiding controversial stories to protect careers.
How does Andrew Fowler critique mainstream media in the book?
Fowler argues outlets like the BBC and The New York Times became complicit by cozying up to power, accepting manipulated leaks, and avoiding hard-hitting investigations. He highlights layoffs, editorial timidity, and the rise of “chicken shit editors” who kowtow to political or corporate pressures.
What role do whistleblowers play in
The War on Journalism?
Whistleblowers like Snowden and Manning are portrayed as catalysts for transparency, challenging the collusive relationship between governments and journalists. Their leaks exposed systemic abuses but also triggered retaliatory laws targeting press freedom.
How does the book address Rupert Murdoch’s media empire?
Fowler examines Murdoch’s News of the World phone-hacking scandal as emblematic of unethical tabloid culture. He ties Murdoch’s power to broader trends of sensationalism and political manipulation, undermining journalistic integrity.
What solutions does Fowler propose for journalism’s crisis?
The book urges revitalizing investigative reporting, protecting whistleblowers, and resisting restrictive laws. Fowler advocates for decentralized, independent media to counterbalance corporate and state control.
How does
The War on Journalism compare to Fowler’s other works?
Like The Most Dangerous Man in the World (on Julian Assange), this book critiques institutional power but focuses specifically on media’s decline. Both emphasize the tension between national security narratives and public accountability.
What criticisms exist about
The War on Journalism?
Some argue Fowler oversimplifies media history or downplays digital platforms’ role in disrupting traditional models. Others note the book’s dense case studies may overwhelm casual readers.
Why is
The War on Journalism relevant in 2025?
With governments globally enacting surveillance laws and media layoffs accelerating, Fowler’s warnings about censorship and corporate capture remain urgent. The book’s themes resonate amid AI-driven disinformation and declining trust in institutions.
How does the book define “the price of freedom”?
It refers to the legal, financial, and ethical costs of defending press independence. Fowler warns that without radical reform, democracies risk becoming “unchallenged and unaccountable” regimes.