What is
The Next Great Migration by Sonia Shah about?
The Next Great Migration challenges the perception of migration as a crisis, arguing it’s a natural, lifesaving response to climate change and ecological shifts. Sonia Shah combines science, history, and reporting to show how human and animal migration has shaped biodiversity and societies. The book critiques xenophobic policies and proposes creating safe, organized pathways for the estimated 200 million climate refugees by midcentury.
Who should read
The Next Great Migration?
This book is essential for policymakers, environmentalists, and advocates of social justice. It appeals to readers interested in climate change, biodiversity, and human rights, offering a data-driven rebuttal to anti-immigration narratives. Students of ecology, sociology, or geopolitics will find its interdisciplinary approach valuable.
What are the main arguments in
The Next Great Migration?
Key arguments include:
- Migration is biologically innate and has driven human evolution.
- “Native” species and static habitats are myths rooted in colonial-era pseudoscience.
- Walls and restrictions harm ecosystems and exacerbate humanitarian crises.
- Managed migration could mitigate climate displacement and boost societal resilience.
How does
The Next Great Migration address climate refugees?
Shah predicts up to 200 million climate refugees by 2050 and argues against containment strategies. Instead, she advocates for international frameworks to facilitate safe movement, noting that barriers like the U.S.-Mexico border wall endanger 90+ species while failing to deter migrants.
What historical examples support Shah’s thesis on migration?
The book traces human migration from East Africa to global settlements, including Polynesian navigation and genetic diversity shaped by mobility. Shah dismantles the idea that pre-modern societies were static, highlighting how migration spurred cultural and biological adaptation.
Does
The Next Great Migration critique conservation biology?
Yes. Shah challenges conservationists’ focus on “native” species, arguing this ignores migration’s role in ecosystems. She critiques habitat theories that prioritize geographic purity over dynamic ecological processes, which often align with anti-immigration rhetoric.
What are criticisms of
The Next Great Migration?
Some reviewers note Shah’s optimism about managed migration may underestimate political hurdles. However, her evidence-based approach reframes migration as an opportunity rather than a threat, countering fatalistic climate narratives.
How does Sonia Shah’s background influence the book?
A Guggenheim fellow and science journalist, Shah draws on her expertise in epidemiology (Pandemic) and global inequities. Her investigative rigor shines in dissecting migration myths, while her focus on marginalized communities adds ethical depth.
How does
The Next Great Migration compare to Shah’s other works?
Like Pandemic, it interweaves science and social justice but shifts focus to mobility. While The Fever examined disease history, this book links migration to survival, reflecting Shah’s evolving exploration of humanity’s relationship with environmental change.
What solutions does Shah propose for climate-induced migration?
- Replace border walls with climate-resilient infrastructure.
- Develop international visa programs for displaced populations.
- Invest in social integration to harness migrants’ economic and cultural contributions.
Why is
The Next Great Migration relevant in 2025?
With rising climate disasters and political tensions over borders, Shah’s framework offers a proactive alternative to crisis-driven responses. The book’s emphasis on adaptability resonates amid AI-driven workforce shifts and global biodiversity decline.
What iconic quotes define
The Next Great Migration?
- “Migration is not a bug but a feature of life on Earth.”
- “Walls endanger species far more effectively than they stop people.”
These lines encapsulate Shah’s argument that mobility is inseparable from ecological and human survival.
How does the book redefine “belonging”?
Shah argues “belonging” is dynamic, not tied to geography. By tracing how humans and species continuously adapt, she reimagines identity as rooted in movement—a perspective crucial for climate adaptation.