Says Who? by Anne Curzan Summary

Says Who? challenges rigid grammar rules by exploring how English evolves through cultural shifts and common usage. Linguist Anne Curzan blends humor with linguistic research to debunk myths about "correct" language, addressing topics like split infinitives, singular they, and dictionary labeling. The book emphasizes adapting language for clarity and inclusivity rather than strict adherence to outdated norms.

This book suits grammar enthusiasts seeking a fresh perspective, writers navigating formal vs. informal tone, and anyone curious about linguistic equity. Curzan’s approachable style appeals to both rule-bound traditionalists and colloquial speakers, offering tools to become language "caretakers" rather than gatekeepers.

Yes—the book provides actionable insights into balancing precision with inclusivity in communication. Curzan’s witty analysis of language debates (e.g., who vs. whom) and real-world examples (job interviews vs. barbecues) make it a valuable resource for educators, professionals, and word nerds alike.

Curzan traces rules to 18th-century prescriptivists and reveals how usage trends shape modern standards. For example, snuck overtook sneaked through widespread adoption, demonstrating how language democratically evolves. The book highlights how dictionaries track—rather than dictate—these changes.

• “Caretakers of language, not gatekeepers”: Encourages adapting rules to context rather than enforcing absolutes.
• “Linguistic pajamas vs. verbal tux”: Metaphor for matching language formality to setting.
• “Debates about language are about more than language”: Ties usage conflicts to social values.

Yes. Curzan defends singular they as both historically rooted (used since Chaucer’s era) and essential for gender inclusivity. She critiques opposition as prioritizing outdated norms over clarity and respect.

Curzan dismantles the myth that splitting infinitives (e.g., to boldly go) is grammatically wrong, noting the “rule” originated from Latin-based 18th-century pedantry. She advocates using split infinitives when they enhance rhythm or meaning.

Some traditionalists argue the book overly prioritizes linguistic flexibility, potentially muddying clarity. However, Curzan counters that context-aware usage preserves precision while fostering inclusivity—a balance supported by most modern linguists.

While Benjamin Dreyer’s guide focuses on practical style rules, Says Who? examines why rules exist and when to bend them. Both emphasize clarity, but Curzan’s work leans more on linguistic evolution and social equity, making them complementary reads.

Absolutely. The book teaches tailoring language to audience expectations—using formal structures for resumes but colloquialisms in team chats. Curzan provides frameworks for avoiding unintentional bias while maintaining authority.

As AI tools like Grammarly enforce rigid standards, Curzan’s human-centric approach helps balance automation with empathy. The book’s focus on inclusive language aligns with global DEI initiatives, making it a timely resource for educators and workplaces.

• “Linguistic pajamas”: Overly casual language in formal settings.
• “Verbal tux”: Unnecessarily stiff phrasing in relaxed contexts.
• “Usage novices”: Individuals learning to navigate language norms.