What is
Post Corona: From Crisis to Opportunity about?
Post Corona analyzes how COVID-19 accelerated pre-existing economic and societal trends, cementing the dominance of tech giants like Amazon and Zoom while devastating sectors like hospitality and education. Scott Galloway explores the pandemic’s role in widening inequality, reshaping consumer behavior, and forcing businesses to adapt or perish. The book blends sharp business insights with warnings about declining social mobility and corporate responsibility.
Who should read
Post Corona: From Crisis to Opportunity?
Business leaders, entrepreneurs, policymakers, and anyone interested in understanding tech’s growing influence will find this book essential. It’s particularly relevant for those analyzing post-pandemic economic shifts, digital transformation, or strategies to navigate volatile markets. Galloway’s accessible style also appeals to general readers seeking a macro-level view of societal changes.
Is
Post Corona worth reading?
Yes—it offers a compelling, data-driven analysis of pandemic-driven disruptions, backed by Galloway’s expertise as a NYU professor and tech entrepreneur. The book’s predictions about tech monopolies, remote work, and economic inequality remain pertinent in 2025, making it a valuable resource for understanding ongoing digital acceleration.
How did COVID-19 accelerate tech monopolies according to Scott Galloway?
Galloway argues the pandemic turbocharged tech giants’ growth by intensifying reliance on e-commerce (Amazon), remote collaboration (Zoom), and streaming services. He details how these firms leveraged scale and infrastructure to crush competitors, predicting sustained dominance without regulatory intervention.
What industries does Galloway predict will struggle post-pandemic?
Higher education, brick-and-mortar retail, and traditional hospitality face existential threats due to outdated models exposed by the crisis. Galloway highlights universities’ declining value proposition without in-person networking and restaurants’ vulnerability to delivery-app economics.
What key quotes define
Post Corona?
- “The pandemic has not been a change agent so much as an accelerant”: Galloway’s thesis that COVID-19 sped up inevitable trends.
- “Our commonwealth didn’t just happen, it was shaped”: A call to address systemic inequities through policy.
How does
Post Corona critique capitalism?
Galloway condemns shareholder primacy and lax antitrust enforcement, arguing they enabled tech monopolies to prioritize profits over societal wellbeing. He advocates for policies to curb corporate power and reinvest in public goods like education and healthcare.
What frameworks does Galloway use to analyze post-COVID business?
The book emphasizes “the accelerant effect”—how crises amplify winners and losers—and “digital Darwinism,” where companies adapt or die. Case studies contrast agile firms like Peloton with slow-moving incumbents.
How does
Post Corona compare to Galloway’s earlier book
The Four?
While The Four dissects tech giants’ pre-pandemic rise, Post Corona examines their crisis-enabled dominance and broader societal impacts. Both books critique unchecked corporate power but diverge in scope: The Four focuses on corporate strategies; Post Corona addresses systemic policy failures.
What solutions does Galloway propose for economic recovery?
He advocates taxing tech monopolies, revitalizing vocational education, and reimagining urban spaces for hybrid work. Galloway also stresses rebuilding trust in institutions through transparency and equitable growth initiatives.
How relevant is
Post Corona in 2025?
Its themes remain critical amid ongoing debates about AI regulation, remote work evolution, and wealth gaps. The book’s warnings about digital inequality and corporate consolidation have intensified with recent tech layoffs and antitrust lawsuits.
What are criticisms of
Post Corona?
Some argue it overemphasizes tech’s role while underselling healthcare and climate challenges. Others note Galloway’s pro-capitalist solutions contradict his systemic critiques, creating tension between reform and radical change.