What is
Natives: Race and Class in the Ruins of Empire about?
Natives blends memoir, historical analysis, and social critique to examine Britain’s racial and class inequalities. Akala interweaves his experiences growing up mixed-race in 1980s–90s London with explorations of imperialism, systemic racism, and myths of meritocracy. The book connects historical atrocities like the Atlantic slave trade to modern issues like police violence and educational disparities, arguing that race and class remain inseparable forces shaping British society.
Who should read
Natives: Race and Class in the Ruins of Empire?
This book is essential for readers interested in anti-racism, British colonialism, or class dynamics. Educators, policymakers, and activists will find its critiques of systemic inequality particularly relevant, while fans of Akala’s music or journalism gain insight into his intellectual foundations. It also appeals to those seeking narratives bridging personal trauma with broader historical patterns.
Is
Natives: Race and Class in the Ruins of Empire worth reading?
Yes—Natives offers a searing, well-researched perspective on Britain’s racial and economic hierarchies. Its blend of autobiography and history makes complex theories accessible, while Akala’s sharp critiques of media bias, educational inequity, and imperial legacies provide fresh angles on enduring social issues. The book’s unflinching honesty and multidisciplinary approach have earned praise for illuminating systemic oppression.
Who is Akala, the author of
Natives?
Akala (born Kingslee Daley) is a British-Jamaican rapper, historian, and activist known for his work on race and class. A MOBO Award-winning hip-hop artist, he founded the Hip-Hop Shakespeare Company and has become a prominent voice on imperialism. His lived experience with racism in London and autodidactic approach to education inform Natives’ blend of scholarly rigor and personal narrative.
How does
Natives critique the idea of meritocracy?
Akala dismantles the myth that Britain rewards talent and effort equally, showing how race and class gatekeep opportunity. He highlights biased teacher expectations, discriminatory policing, and media dehumanization of Black figures like Linford Christie, arguing these systems ensure working-class and minority groups face structural barriers to advancement.
What historical events does
Natives analyze?
The book examines Japan’s imperialism, Spanish conceptions of Blackness in the 1400s, the Arab and Atlantic slave trades, and British rule in Hong Kong. Akala ties these to modern issues, showing how colonial violence and racial hierarchies underpin contemporary capitalism, immigration policies, and cultural attitudes.
How does
Natives address education and racism in the UK?
Akala details being placed in remedial classes despite academic talent, linking this to studies showing teachers mark Black students more harshly. He contrasts this with Pan-African Saturday schools that fostered critical thinking, arguing mainstream education often perpetuates racism by erasing non-European histories and lowballing minority students.
What is the significance of the “Linford’s Lunchbox” chapter?
This chapter dissects media obsession with athlete Linford Christie’s body instead of his achievements, exposing how Black masculinity is hypersexualized and dehumanized. Akala frames this as part of a broader pattern where Black success is diminished through racist stereotyping in sports and pop culture.
Does
Natives discuss the far right’s influence in Britain?
Yes—Akala critiques far-right rhetoric like the “white genocide” conspiracy theory and examines how “free speech” arguments amplify hate groups. He connects modern xenophobia to imperial ideologies, showing how fear of lost dominance fuels anti-immigrant and anti-Black policies.
How does
Natives compare to other books on race in Britain?
Unlike purely historical or theoretical works, Natives merges memoir with academic analysis, offering a visceral, intersectional perspective. It complements texts like Brit(ish) by Afua Hirsch but stands out for its class-conscious lens and critique of liberal complacency.
What critiques exist about
Natives?
Some argue Akala’s pessimism about systemic change lacks actionable solutions, while others note the dense historical sections demand prior knowledge. However, most praise its ambition in linking personal and political, calling it a vital intervention in debates on race and class.
Why is
Natives relevant in understanding modern British society?
The book exposes how imperialism’s legacy shapes everything from gentrification to Brexit-era nationalism. By connecting Windrush deportations, knife crime, and media racism to deeper colonial patterns, Akala provides tools to dissect modern inequalities rooted in Britain’s unresolved past.