
Dive into the essence of knowledge with Jennifer Nagel's acclaimed philosophical guide that transforms complex epistemology into accessible wisdom. In our post-truth era, this Oxford University Press gem challenges how we justify beliefs - a vital intellectual compass for navigating today's information wilderness.
Feel the book through the author's voice
Turn knowledge into engaging, example-rich insights
Capture key ideas in a flash for fast learning
Enjoy the book in a fun and engaging way
Break down key ideas from Knowledge into bite-sized takeaways to understand how innovative teams create, collaborate, and grow.
Distill Knowledge into rapid-fire memory cues that highlight Pixar’s principles of candor, teamwork, and creative resilience.

Experience Knowledge through vivid storytelling that turns Pixar’s innovation lessons into moments you’ll remember and apply.
Ask anything, pick the voice, and co-create insights that truly resonate with you.

From Columbia University alumni built in San Francisco

Get the Knowledge summary as a free PDF or EPUB. Print it or read offline anytime.
Have you ever been absolutely certain about something, only to discover later you were completely wrong? This universal experience sits at the heart of epistemology - philosophy's exploration of knowledge itself. In our digital age, we're drowning in information yet increasingly uncertain about what constitutes genuine knowledge. When "alternative facts" compete with expertise and misinformation spreads faster than truth, understanding the foundations of knowledge has never been more vital. Knowledge isn't like water or gold - it can't exist independently of a knower. While we often imagine knowledge flowing freely through databases and libraries, it requires a mind to access and interpret it. Facts only become knowledge when processed by a thinking subject, whether an individual physicist interpreting quantum data or a research team collectively understanding phenomena no single member fully grasps. What separates knowing from merely thinking? When we say "Maya knows the door is locked" versus "Sam thinks the door is locked," we recognize a fundamental distinction. Knowledge is factive - it can only connect a person to truth. If Maya knows the door is locked, then it must actually be locked. Thinking, however, might be false. But truth alone isn't sufficient - knowledge requires proper justification beyond mere lucky guesses. Consider someone who correctly believes their spouse is faithful, but only out of blind trust rather than based on evidence. Despite being right, this might not constitute genuine knowledge. Most philosophers hold that truth exists independently of our beliefs - a position that explains how we recognize our past mistakes. We once "knew" Earth was flat and the sun revolved around us. Our ability to acknowledge these errors demonstrates that truth transcends belief.