What is
Hit Men by Fredric Dannen about?
Hit Men exposes the corrupt underbelly of the 1970s–1980s music industry, detailing how record labels, independent promoters, and organized crime colluded to control radio airplay and profits. Fredric Dannen investigates payola schemes, ruthless executives like CBS Records’ Walter Yetnikoff, and the "Network" of promoters tied to the mafia. The book blends investigative journalism with insider accounts to reveal systemic greed and power struggles.
Music enthusiasts, industry professionals, and pop culture historians will find Hit Men compelling. It appeals to readers interested in corporate corruption, the intersection of crime and entertainment, or the business dynamics behind iconic artists like Michael Jackson and Billy Joel. Critics praise its depth, though some note its focus on specific executives.
Is
Hit Men worth reading?
Yes. Dannen’s meticulous research and gripping storytelling make Hit Men a seminal work on music industry machinations. It ranked #2 on Billboard’s "100 Greatest Music Books" and remains relevant for its insights into payola and corporate excess. The 2010 epilogue updates the narrative for the digital age, though some readers find sections overly detailed.
How does
Hit Men explore music industry corruption?
The book reveals how labels paid independent promoters (the "Network") to bribe radio stations for airplay, often using mob connections. Dannen ties these practices to declining artistic integrity and inflated chart success, highlighting figures like promoter Joe Isgro and Columbia Records’ Yetnikoff, who leveraged payola to dominate Billboard rankings.
What role did independent promoters play in
Hit Men?
Independent promoters acted as middlemen between labels and radio, using cash, drugs, and mob ties to secure airplay. Dannen dubs them the "Network," showcasing their stranglehold on Top 40 radio and their role in perpetuating payola. Their influence waned after 1980s federal investigations.
Who is Walter Yetnikoff in
Hit Men?
Yetnikoff, CEO of CBS Records, epitomized 1980s excess. Dannen portrays him as a brash, alcoholic power broker who used threats and payoffs to dominate the industry, signing stars like Bruce Springsteen. His eventual downfall mirrors the industry’s shift from analog-era corruption to corporate consolidation.
Does
Hit Men cover organized crime’s influence on the music industry?
Yes. Dannen traces mob ties to independent promoters, detailing how crime families like the Gambinos profited from payola. The book also links Columbia Records to dubious financial dealings, showing how labels turned a blind eye to criminality for commercial gain.
What are the main criticisms of
Hit Men?
Some readers argue Dannen overemphasizes CBS Records and Yetnikoff, neglecting other labels. Others find the organized crime sections tangential or the financial details dry. Despite this, most praise its exhaustive research and narrative pace.
How does
Hit Men compare to other music industry exposés?
Unlike memoirs or artist-focused books, Hit Men adopts a journalistic lens, akin to Marc Eliot’s Rockonomics. It predates streaming-era analyses but set the standard for examining industry corruption. Dannen’s later work, Hong Kong Babylon, similarly explores crime-entertainment ties.
How did
Hit Men impact the music business upon release?
The book sparked debates about payola and ethics, though systemic issues persisted. Its 1990 publication coincided with federal probes into radio promotion, indirectly contributing to the decline of the "Network" and the rise of corporate-controlled playlisting.
What research methods did Fredric Dannen use in
Hit Men?
Dannen combined court documents, insider interviews, and financial records to build his case. He interviewed over 200 industry figures, including disgruntled executives and prosecutors, creating a mosaic of firsthand accounts and verified data.
Is
Hit Men relevant to today’s music industry?
Yes. While payola evolved into legalized "play for placement" deals, Hit Men’s themes of power consolidation and ethical compromises persist. The 2010 epilogue critiques streaming’s rise, making it a primer for understanding modern industry dynamics.