What is
Enlightenment Now by Steven Pinker about?
Enlightenment Now (2018) argues that Enlightenment values—reason, science, and humanism—have driven unprecedented progress in health, safety, and prosperity. Through 75+ data-rich graphs, Pinker demonstrates global improvements in lifespan, poverty reduction, and peace while countering modern pessimism. He urges defending these ideals against tribalistic and authoritarian threats to sustain progress.
Who should read
Enlightenment Now?
This book suits readers interested in data-driven optimism, philosophy, or societal trends. Policymakers, educators, and advocates of science will find value in its defense of rational problem-solving. Critics of "doom-and-gloom" narratives or fans of Pinker’s earlier works like The Better Angels of Our Nature will also appreciate its evidence-based perspective.
Is
Enlightenment Now worth reading?
Yes, for its compelling synthesis of history, science, and philosophy. Pinker’s accessible writing and robust data make complex trends digestible. While critics argue he downplays climate risks or inequality, the book’s emphasis on solutions over cynicism offers a refreshing counterpoint to media negativity.
What are the main ideas in
Enlightenment Now?
- Enlightenment Values: Reason, scientific inquiry, and humanism as drivers of progress.
- Progress Metrics: Declining violence, rising lifespans, and expanding literacy since the 18th century.
- Modern Challenges: Addressing climate change, inequality, and political polarization through evidence-based policies.
How does Pinker defend the Enlightenment in
Enlightenment Now?
Pinker contrasts pre-Enlightenment superstitions (e.g., witch hunts, divine-right monarchies) with post-Enlightenment advancements like vaccines, democracy, and human rights. He attributes setbacks (e.g., populism, pseudoscience) to innate cognitive biases, not Enlightenment failures, advocating doubled commitment to its ideals.
What critiques exist about
Enlightenment Now?
Some scholars argue Pinker overlooks systemic issues like colonial legacies or environmental degradation’s pace. Others claim his optimism underestimates existential risks (e.g., AI, nuclear war). However, supporters praise his rebuttal of nostalgic "golden age" myths.
How does
Enlightenment Now compare to Pinker’s
The Better Angels of Our Nature?
Both books use data to argue humanity is improving, but Enlightenment Now broadens focus beyond violence reduction to metrics like happiness and knowledge. It also directly addresses 21st-century challenges (e.g., populism, misinformation) and expands on humanism’s role in ethics.
What quotes from
Enlightenment Now are most impactful?
- “Optimism is not complacency”: Urges proactive problem-solving.
- “The world is not a zero-sum struggle”: Challenges tribalistic mindsets.
- “Data is a dirty drug for pessimists”: Highlights media’s negative bias.
How does
Enlightenment Now address climate change?
Pinker acknowledges climate risks but rejects apocalyptic framing. He advocates for green technology investments (e.g., nuclear energy, carbon capture) and global cooperation, arguing Enlightenment-driven innovation historically solves such challenges.
Why is
Enlightenment Now relevant in 2025?
Amid AI ethics debates, political polarization, and climate anxiety, the book’s case for evidence-based governance and international collaboration remains critical. Its anti-fatalism message counters resignation to crises like pandemics or inequality.
What frameworks in
Enlightenment Now apply to personal growth?
- Reason over emotion: Making decisions via data, not fear.
- Collaborative problem-solving: Prioritizing collective well-being over tribalism.
- Long-term thinking: Viewing setbacks as solvable through incremental progress.
How does
Enlightenment Now define humanism?
Humanism here emphasizes moral concern for all individuals’ flourishing, rejecting dogma or hierarchy. Pinker ties it to secular ethics, free speech, and policies reducing suffering (e.g., universal healthcare, education access).