What is
Destiny of the Republic by Candice Millard about?
Destiny of the Republic chronicles President James A. Garfield’s rise from poverty to the presidency, his 1881 assassination by Charles Guiteau, and the medical blunders that ultimately caused his death. Candice Millard intertwines political drama, technological innovation (like Alexander Graham Bell’s bullet-locating device), and a critique of 19th-century medical practices to reveal how Garfield’s tragedy spurred civil service reforms.
Who should read
Destiny of the Republic?
History enthusiasts, political science students, and readers interested in medical history will appreciate this narrative. Millard’s gripping storytelling appeals to fans of biographical works like The Devil in the White City, offering insights into Gilded Age politics, leadership, and the consequences of institutional corruption.
Is
Destiny of the Republic worth reading?
Yes—it combines rigorous research with page-turning suspense. Millard humanizes Garfield as a self-made scholar and reformer, while exposing the lethal hubris of his doctors and the toxic political climate. The book’s exploration of how one death reshaped American governance makes it a compelling read.
How does
Destiny of the Republic explain Garfield’s assassination?
Guiteau, a delusional office-seeker, believed killing Garfield would unite the Republican Party and earn him fame. Millard traces his psychological unraveling and the era’s patronage system, which incentivized political violence. Garfield’s resistance to the "spoils system" made him a target of Conkling’s Stalwart faction, indirectly enabling Guiteau’s act.
What medical mistakes doomed Garfield?
Doctors ignored antiseptic practices, causing fatal sepsis. Dr. Bliss repeatedly probed Garfield’s wound with unsterilized fingers, dismissed Joseph Lister’s germ theory, and rejected Bell’s metal-detecting device. An autopsy later showed the bullet missed vital organs—Garfield likely would have survived with modern care.
How did Garfield’s death transform U.S. politics?
His assassination galvanized support for the Pendleton Civil Service Act (1883), which replaced patronage with merit-based federal hiring. Vice President Chester Arthur, once a Conkling ally, unexpectedly championed the reform, dismantling the system that had fueled Guiteau’s rage.
What role does Alexander Graham Bell play in the story?
Bell races to invent an induction balance to locate the bullet non-invasively. Despite multiple attempts, Dr. Bliss restricts Bell to searching only Garfield’s right side—the wrong area. The device later proves effective in medical trials, cementing Bell’s legacy beyond the telephone.
How does Millard portray the political conflict between Garfield and Roscoe Conkling?
Conkling, leader of the Stalwarts, demands control over patronage appointments, while Garfield allies with Half-Breed reformers. Their clash symbolizes the era’s corruption, with Conkling resigning from the Senate in protest—a move that backfires and weakens his faction.
What quote captures Garfield’s view of the presidency?
Garfield called the presidency a “bleak mountain” he felt obligated to ascend. This reflects his reluctance to seek power and his foresight about the challenges ahead, including party infighting and reform resistance.
How does the book critique 19th-century medicine?
Millard highlights how arrogance and ignorance doomed Garfield. U.S. doctors rejected Lister’s antisepsis methods, unlike European peers. Bliss’s refusal to admit error—even as Garfield’s body rotted—exposes a system prioritizing ego over science.
What is Guiteau’s motivation for assassinating Garfield?
Guiteau, influenced by the Oneida Community’s extremist theology, believed God commanded him to kill Garfield to unite Republicans. Millard frames him as a product of extremist ideologies and the patronage system’s toxic incentives.
How does
Destiny of the Republic depict Garfield’s legacy?
Garfield emerges as a symbol of lost potential: a polymath fluent in Greek, advocate for Black voting rights, and proponent of education. His death unified a fractured nation and catalyzed progressive reforms, though his personal modesty overshadowed his achievements.