What is
Cicero: The Life and Times of Rome's Greatest Politician about?
Cicero by Anthony Everitt is a biography exploring the life of ancient Rome’s foremost orator and statesman. It traces his political career, philosophical contributions, and turbulent clashes with figures like Julius Caesar and Mark Antony, while contextualizing his role in the collapse of the Roman Republic. The book blends historical rigor with vivid storytelling, emphasizing Cicero’s enduring influence on Western governance and rhetoric.
Who should read
Cicero: The Life and Times of Rome's Greatest Politician?
History enthusiasts, students of political philosophy, and readers fascinated by ancient Rome will find this book compelling. It appeals to those interested in leadership, rhetoric, and the interplay between personal ambition and public service. Everitt’s accessible style also makes it suitable for general audiences seeking a nuanced portrait of Republican Rome.
Is
Cicero: The Life and Times of Rome's Greatest Politician worth reading?
Yes. Everitt combines meticulous research with engaging prose, offering both scholarly depth and narrative flair. Critics praise its balanced portrayal of Cicero’s brilliance, vanity, and moral complexities, making it a standout biography for understanding late Republican Rome.
How does Anthony Everitt portray Cicero’s political philosophy?
Everitt highlights Cicero’s advocacy for a mixed constitution blending monarchy, democracy, and oligarchy. The book emphasizes his belief in legal checks to prevent autocracy, as articulated in On the State, and his lifelong struggle to preserve Republican ideals amid civil wars and dictatorships.
What were Cicero’s major conflicts with figures like Julius Caesar?
Cicero opposed Caesar’s autocratic ambitions, fearing the Republic’s collapse. Though initially supportive of Pompey against Caesar, he later critiqued both leaders’ power grabs. His conflicts with Mark Antony after Caesar’s assassination ultimately led to his execution.
How does the book address Cicero’s personal life and flaws?
Everitt portrays Cicero as a devoted family man but also vain and politically opportunistic. The biography examines his exile after illegal executions, his strategic alliances, and his vulnerability to personal slights, humanizing him without excusing his missteps.
What is Cicero’s legacy according to Anthony Everitt?
Cicero’s writings on governance, ethics, and rhetoric shaped Western political thought. John Adams called him “the greatest statesman and philosopher combined,” reflecting his enduring impact on democratic ideals. Everitt underscores his role as a martyr for Republican principles.
Does the book discuss Cicero’s death?
Yes. Everitt details Cicero’s 43 BC execution under Mark Antony’s orders, his severed head and hands displayed in the Roman Forum. This brutal end symbolizes the Republic’s final collapse and Cicero’s tragic fate as a defender of liberty.
How does Everitt’s biography compare to other works on Cicero?
Praised for its readability, the book synthesizes Cicero’s letters, speeches, and historical context into a cohesive narrative. Unlike drier academic texts, it balances political intrigue with personal anecdotes, making it a gateway for newcomers.
What criticisms does the book highlight about Cicero?
Everitt critiques Cicero’s vanity, political naivety, and tendency toward self-aggrandizement. His failure to ally effectively with Pompey and overestimation of his influence after Caesar’s death are framed as fatal flaws.
What sources did Anthony Everitt use in writing
Cicero?
The biography draws on Cicero’s 900+ surviving letters (many to Atticus), speeches like Against Catiline, and works by Plutarch and Sallust. Everitt also references archaeological findings to reconstruct Republican Rome’s social dynamics.
How does the book explore the fall of the Roman Republic?
Through Cicero’s career, Everitt analyzes corruption, populism, and military dictatorships that eroded Republican institutions. The biography serves as a cautionary tale about power imbalances and the fragility of democratic systems.