What is
Broken Government by John W. Dean about?
Broken Government analyzes how Republican leadership from Nixon to George W. Bush eroded legislative, executive, and judicial branches through partisan tactics like lax congressional oversight, expansion of presidential power, and judicial politicization. Dean exposes systemic failures, including lobbyist-driven legislation, collapsed checks and balances, and ethical breaches like the Valerie Plame leak.
Who should read
Broken Government?
This book suits political science enthusiasts, historians, and voters seeking insight into U.S. governance decline. It’s particularly relevant for readers examining partisan polarization, executive overreach, or the impact of ideology on institutions like the Justice Department.
Is
Broken Government worth reading?
Yes, for its insider perspective: Dean, Nixon’s former White House Counsel, combines firsthand experience with rigorous analysis of Republican-led dysfunction. The book details actionable reforms and underscores risks of unchecked power, making it a timely resource despite its 2007 publication.
How does
Broken Government critique Congressional oversight?
Dean argues GOP-controlled Congresses ignored constitutional duties, permitting executive abuses like warrantless surveillance. Tactics included extending vote times to pressure holdouts and letting lobbyists draft bills—exemplified by Tom DeLay’s admission about corporate influence.
What examples of executive overreach does Dean highlight?
The book cites Bush-Cheney’s “unitary executive” theory to bypass Congress, politicizing the Justice Department, and shielding Scooter Libby after the Plame leak. Dean also notes neglect of Iraq War oversight and homeland security failures.
How does
Broken Government address judicial branch politicization?
Dean critiques Republican efforts to pack courts with ideologues, notably fundamentalist judges. He ties this to a broader strategy to entrench conservative agendas, undermining judicial impartiality.
What are key takeaways from
Broken Government?
- Congressional dysfunction: Closed rules and partisan tactics marginalized minority input.
- Executive secrecy: Bush expanded presidential authority while evading accountability.
- Ethical decay: Nonpartisan career officials left due to political interference.
How does
Broken Government compare to Dean’s earlier works?
Unlike Blind Ambition (Watergate memoir) or Conservatives Without Conscience (ideological critique), this book offers a comprehensive analysis of institutional decay across all government branches, linking historical patterns to modern crises.
What criticisms exist about
Broken Government?
Some view Dean’s tone as partisan, though he substantiates claims with legislative records and insider accounts. Critics argue he overlooks Democratic complicity, but the book focuses on systemic GOP-driven failures.
Why is
Broken Government relevant today?
Its warnings about eroded checks and balances mirror current debates over presidential power, Supreme Court politicization, and congressional gridlock—making it a primer for understanding ongoing governance challenges.
How does Dean’s Watergate experience inform
Broken Government?
His role in Nixon’s cover-up and subsequent cooperation with investigators provides unique insight into executive abuses, reinforcing his analysis of Bush-era secrecy and accountability gaps.
What notable quotes appear in
Broken Government?
Dean writes, "When George Bush is president, no evidence of corruption or incompetence is shocking enough to warrant congressional attention"—highlighting legislative passivity amid executive misconduct.
How does
Broken Government suggest fixing governmental flaws?
Dean advocates restoring congressional oversight, depoliticizing judicial appointments, and enforcing transparency norms. He emphasizes bipartisan cooperation to rebuild institutional integrity.