What is
Breaking Up with Sugar by Molly Carmel about?
Breaking Up with Sugar offers a science-backed approach to overcoming sugar addiction by addressing emotional dependencies and dietary cycles. Molly Carmel, a therapist and former sugar addict, outlines a 66-day reset plan, seven vows for behavioral change, and meal strategies to break free from sugar’s grip. The book combines personal anecdotes, client stories, and actionable steps to help readers build a healthier relationship with food.
This book is ideal for individuals struggling with yo-yo dieting, emotional eating, or sugar addiction. It’s also valuable for those seeking sustainable weight management or tired of restrictive diets. Molly Carmel’s methods resonate with readers who want psychological tools rather than calorie-counting rules.
Is
Breaking Up with Sugar worth reading?
Yes—unlike typical diet guides, Carmel focuses on reshaping your relationship with food through behavioral frameworks, not deprivation. The 66-day reset plan and vow system provide structure, while relatable client stories offer real-world proof of success.
What is the 66-day reset plan in
Breaking Up with Sugar?
This core framework involves abstaining from sugar and refined flour for 66 days to reset neural pathways tied to addiction. Carmel emphasizes meal prep, distraction techniques during cravings, and tracking progress. The period aligns with research on habit formation, helping users transition to long-term change.
How does Molly Carmel compare sugar addiction to drug addiction?
Carmel argues sugar activates the brain’s reward system similarly to substances like alcohol, creating dependency cycles. She cites studies showing sugar withdrawal triggers cravings and mood swings, paralleling drug addiction’s biochemical effects. This perspective reframes overeating as a treatable compulsion, not a moral failure.
What are the “seven vows” in
Breaking Up with Sugar?
These behavioral commitments include promises like “I vow to eat three meals a day” and “I vow to ask for help.” Designed to replace diet rules, the vows foster mindfulness, accountability, and self-compassion. They target common triggers, such as skipping meals or isolation, that lead to binge eating.
Does
Breaking Up with Sugar include meal plans?
Yes—the book provides sugar-free meal templates emphasizing protein, healthy fats, and fiber to stabilize blood sugar. Examples include avocado-egg breakfasts and lettuce-wrapped tacos. Carmel also advises meal prep strategies to reduce decision fatigue and avoid relapse.
How does
Breaking Up with Sugar address emotional eating?
Carmel encourages readers to identify emotional triggers (stress, boredom) and replace sugar with coping mechanisms like journaling or calling a friend. She likens quitting sugar to ending a toxic relationship, requiring grief processing and self-redefinition.
What makes
Breaking Up with Sugar different from other diet books?
Unlike calorie-focused guides, Carmel’s approach targets the why behind overeating. She blends cognitive-behavioral techniques with addiction science, avoiding “good vs. bad” food labels. The book also rejects short-term fixes, prioritizing lasting psychological shifts over rapid weight loss.
How does Molly Carmel suggest handling sugar cravings?
Strategies include delaying the craving (setting a 10-minute timer), drinking water, or engaging in distracting activities like walking. Carmel also advises creating “emergency kits” with non-triggering snacks (e.g., nuts) and scripting responses to social pressure.
Can
Breaking Up with Sugar help with weight loss?
While not a weight-loss manual, Carmel notes that reducing sugar often leads to natural weight management by stabilizing hunger hormones. Success stories in the book highlight improved energy and reduced inflammation, alongside gradual, sustainable weight changes.
What critiques exist about
Breaking Up with Sugar?
Some readers may find the 66-day reset challenging due to its strict initial phase. Carmel acknowledges the plan requires significant lifestyle adjustments but argues it’s necessary to break addiction cycles. Critics of “all-or-nothing” approaches might prefer moderation-focused methods.