What is
Autocracy, Inc. about?
Autocracy, Inc. by Anne Applebaum examines how modern authoritarian regimes collaborate globally to undermine democracies, using kleptocratic financial systems, disinformation campaigns, and shared tactics to consolidate power. The book highlights networks like Russia, China, and Iran that weaponize corruption, suppress dissent, and erode institutional trust while evading accountability.
Who should read
Autocracy, Inc.?
This book is essential for policymakers, journalists, and readers interested in global politics, authoritarianism, or democratic resilience. Applebaum’s insights appeal to those analyzing systemic threats to freedom, from disinformation to transnational corruption, making it timely for understanding 21st-century geopolitical conflicts.
Is
Autocracy, Inc. worth reading?
Yes—Applebaum’s rigorous analysis of autocratic alliances offers critical perspective on looming threats to democracy. While some critics note a lack of concrete solutions, the book’s examination of kleptocracy, propaganda, and institutional decay makes it a vital resource for navigating modern geopolitics.
How do autocracies collaborate according to Anne Applebaum?
Autocracies form pragmatic networks to share tactics like election interference, cyberattacks, and financial manipulation. These regimes prioritize power preservation over ideology, coordinating through shadow economies and leveraging Western institutions’ weaknesses to destabilize democracies.
What role does disinformation play in
Autocracy, Inc.?
Disinformation is central to modern autocratic strategy, eroding public trust in facts and institutions. Applebaum details how states like Russia and China use social media, bots, and state media to spread conspiracy theories, polarize societies, and legitimize authoritarian narratives globally.
What are the main critiques of
Autocracy, Inc.?
Some reviewers argue the book focuses more on diagnosing autocratic systems than offering actionable solutions. Others note its grim tone but acknowledge its value in exposing transnational kleptocracy and the urgency of democratic reform.
How does Applebaum suggest combating autocratic networks?
Solutions include enhancing financial transparency (e.g., tracking oligarchs’ assets), regulating social media to curb disinformation, and strengthening international alliances. Applebaum emphasizes preemptive intelligence efforts and countering authoritarian influence in democratic institutions.
How does
Autocracy, Inc. relate to Applebaum’s previous work?
It expands on themes from her Pulitzer-winning Gulag and Iron Curtain, shifting from historical analysis of Soviet repression to modern authoritarianism’s globalized tactics. The book connects past totalitarian strategies to contemporary threats like cyberwarfare and kleptocracy.
What is the significance of kleptocracy in the book?
Kleptocracy—rule by thieves—enables autocrats to loot state resources, buy foreign influence, and entrench power. Applebaum traces how illicit funds flow through offshore accounts, real estate, and Western banks, undermining legal and economic systems.
Why is
Autocracy, Inc. relevant in 2025?
As autocracies deepen alliances and refine hybrid warfare tactics, the book’s warnings about financial corruption, election meddling, and institutional fragility remain urgent. It contextualizes current crises, from AI-driven disinformation to transnational repression.
How does
Autocracy, Inc. compare to Masha Gessen’s rules for surviving autocracy?
While Gessen’s rules focus on individual resilience (e.g., “believe the autocrat”), Applebaum analyzes systemic autocratic networks. Both highlight institutional vulnerability, but Autocracy, Inc. emphasizes globalized collaboration among dictators versus domestic survival strategies.
What frameworks does Applebaum present in
Autocracy, Inc.?
Key frameworks include:
- Kleptocratic financial systems: Moving illicit wealth globally to evade sanctions.
- Disinformation ecosystems: Weaponizing social media to distort reality.
- Transnational repression: Collaborating to silence dissent across borders.