Angrynomics by Eric Lonergan and Mark Blyth Summary

Angrynomics explores the economic roots of societal anger, analyzing how wage stagnation, inequality, and elite policy failures fuel public frustration. Authors Eric Lonergan and Mark Blyth distinguish between "moral anger" (justified grievances) and "tribal anger" (manipulated by populists), proposing reforms like cash transfers and dual interest rates to address systemic inequities.

This book suits readers seeking to understand the link between economic policies and rising global discontent. It’s ideal for policymakers, students of political economy, and general audiences interested in solutions to inequality, post-2008 financial crises, and the societal impact of events like Brexit and COVID-19.

Yes, for its concise analysis of modern economic anger and actionable solutions. While some critics note its brevity limits depth, the book’s blend of academic rigor and accessible storytelling makes it a timely primer on systemic inequality and reform.

The authors identify moral anger—legitimate frustration over economic injustice—and tribal anger, which is exploited by populists to divide societies. They argue post-2008 austerity and elite bailouts amplified moral anger, while tribal anger fuels polarization.

Key proposals include universal cash transfers, sovereign wealth funds for public investment, dual interest rates to support households, and profit-sharing from tech giants’ data revenues. These aim to reduce wealth gaps and democratize economic gains.

The book critiques post-2008 austerity measures and bank bailouts, arguing they prioritized elites over ordinary citizens. This mismanagement entrenched wage stagnation and asset inflation, worsening public distrust in institutions.

While not explicitly endorsing UBI, Lonergan and Blyth advocate direct cash transfers to households as a tool to stimulate demand and reduce inequality. They frame this as part of a broader strategy to recalibrate economic power.

In a postscript, the authors note pandemic lockdowns exacerbated existing stressors like job insecurity and healthcare inequities. They argue their proposals—particularly cash transfers—could mitigate crisis-driven anger.

Some readers find the book too brief, with insufficient detail on implementing its solutions. Others note its focus on Western economies limits global applicability.

While Austerity dissects the dangers of fiscal cuts, Angrynomics broadens the scope to address societal anger’s economic roots. Both emphasize policy fairness but differ in tone—Angrynomics uses dialogues for accessibility.

The authors suggest central banks issue perpetual zero-interest loans for public infrastructure and support dual-rate systems to lower borrowing costs for households, diverging from traditional inflation-targeting roles.

Notable lines include:

• “Anger is the signal, not the noise”—highlighting frustration as a valid response to systemic failure.
• “We work more for less, while assets inflate”—capturing wage stagnation’s role in driving discontent.