
In "A City on Mars," award-winning researchers Kelly and Zach Weinersmith challenge our space colonization fantasies with sobering reality. What if our cosmic ambitions create more problems than they solve? Winner of the 2024 Royal Society Science Book Prize for transforming how we view humanity's extraterrestrial future.
Kelly Weinersmith and Zach Weinersmith, award-winning science communicators and New York Times bestselling authors, bring their signature humor and rigorous research to A City on Mars: Can We Settle Space, Should We Settle Space, and Have We Really Thought This Through?. Kelly, a parasitologist and Rice University adjunct professor specializing in host-manipulating organisms like the crypt-keeper wasp, combines her ecological expertise with Zach’s science cartooning prowess (SMBC Comics) to dissect the biological, political, and technical challenges of space colonization.
Their previous collaboration, Soonish: Ten Emerging Technologies That’ll Improve and/or Ruin Everything, laid groundwork for analyzing speculative futures through interdisciplinary lenses.
The Weinersmiths’ work has been featured in Nature, The Atlantic, and BBC World, with Kelly regularly appearing on the Science… sort of podcast and speaking at the Smithsonian’s Future Is Here Festival. A City on Mars, winner of the 2024 Royal Society Trivedi Science Book Prize, debuted at #11 on the New York Times Hardback Nonfiction list, cementing their status as critical thinkers navigating humanity’s grandest ambitions.
A City on Mars explores the scientific, ethical, and legal challenges of space settlement, questioning whether humanity should—or even can—sustainably colonize Mars, the Moon, or orbital habitats. Authors Kelly and Zach Weinersmith blend rigorous research with humor, covering topics like space reproduction, extraterrestrial governance, and unintended consequences for Earth, while dissecting myths about off-world living.
This book is ideal for space enthusiasts, sci-fi fans, and policymakers interested in a critical yet entertaining analysis of space colonization. It’s also suited for readers who enjoy popular science infused with humor, such as the Weinersmiths’ earlier work Soonish.
Yes—the book offers a balanced, evidence-based critique of space settlement dreams, combining expert interviews with witty illustrations. It challenges assumptions about off-world living while remaining accessible, making it a standout in both science communication and speculative futurism.
The book highlights unresolved risks like radiation and low-gravity pregnancy, arguing that human reproduction in space remains a major unsolved challenge. Current research suggests developmental abnormalities could occur, making sustainable colonies far riskier than often assumed.
It examines gaps in international space law, including corporate governance, resource extraction rights, and the potential for conflict over lunar “Peaks of Eternal Light”. The authors warn that existing treaties are ill-equipped to handle privatized space settlements.
The Weinersmiths inject levity through absurd hypotheticals (e.g., space cannibalism laws) and Zach’s Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal-style comics. This approach makes complex topics like orbital mechanics or xenobiological risks more engaging.
While not explicitly naming Musk, the book critiques tech-driven colonization narratives for overlooking biological, social, and political realities. It argues that profit-motivated timelines often ignore critical research gaps.
Both books blend deep research with humor, but A City on Mars focuses narrowly on space settlement’s feasibility, whereas Soonish surveyed diverse emerging technologies. The newer work adopts a more cautionary tone, reflecting years of specialized study.
Key arguments against settlement include:
This anecdote illustrates how microgravity dulls taste buds, leading astronauts to crave spicy foods—a humorous example of unexpected daily-life challenges in space. The detail underscores the book’s focus on overlooked pragmatic issues.
It warns that uncontrolled expansion could replicate Earth’s ecological mistakes, advocating for preemptive protections against space debris and celestial resource depletion. The authors compare lunar mining proposals to historical extractive industries.
Absolutely—it provides critical context for 2020s developments like NASA’s Artemis program and commercial space stations. The book’s 2025 release timing positions it as a counterpoint to overly optimistic Mars colonization claims.
Feel the book through the author's voice
Turn knowledge into engaging, example-rich insights
Capture key ideas in a flash for fast learning
Enjoy the book in a fun and engaging way
Space isn't just uncomfortable - it's actively hostile.
Space bastards - skeptics who see the enormous gaps.
The human body wasn't built for space.
The real economic value comes from human ideas.
We face a menu of increasingly awful options.
Break down key ideas from A City on Mars into bite-sized takeaways to understand how innovative teams create, collaborate, and grow.
Distill A City on Mars into rapid-fire memory cues that highlight key principles of candor, teamwork, and creative resilience.

Experience A City on Mars through vivid storytelling that turns innovation lessons into moments you'll remember and apply.
Ask anything, pick the voice, and co-create insights that truly resonate with you.

From Columbia University alumni built in San Francisco
"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."
"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."
"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."
"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."
"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."
"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."
"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."
"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."
"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"
"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."
"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."
"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"
From Columbia University alumni built in San Francisco

Get the A City on Mars summary as a free PDF or EPUB. Print it or read offline anytime.
Picture Elon Musk's vision: a million people living on Mars within our lifetime, humanity spreading across the solar system like pioneers heading west. It's intoxicating stuff. But what if our most cherished space dreams rest on foundations as solid as Martian dust? This isn't another starry-eyed celebration of our cosmic destiny. Instead, it's a reckoning with what actually happens when human bodies, built by millions of years of Earth-bound evolution, confront environments that want them dead. The Weinersmiths spent four years excavating the buried assumptions beneath our space ambitions, transforming from enthusiastic supporters into what they call "space bastards"-skeptics armed with uncomfortable questions. Their conclusion challenges everything we've been told: rushing to colonize space might create more nightmares than solutions, and the gap between SpaceX promotional videos and sustainable off-world living is wider than the gulf between Earth and Mars itself. Every great migration needs a story to justify the journey, and space settlement has collected several. The most seductive is the "backup plan" narrative-that Mars colonies would preserve humanity if Earth becomes uninhabitable. But pause for a moment and consider what this actually means. Even an Earth scorched by nuclear winter, choked by runaway climate change, or devastated by pandemic would remain vastly more hospitable than Mars on its best day. Mars offers no breathable air, no magnetic field to block radiation, and soil laced with toxic perchlorates. Any Mars settlement would require constant Earth resupply for generations, making it useless as actual insurance against terrestrial catastrophe. The environmental salvation pitch fares no better under scrutiny. To merely maintain Earth's current population-not reduce it-we'd need to relocate 220,000 people daily to space. Every single day. Forever. The industrial-scale infrastructure required makes current space programs look like toy rockets. And those dreams of mining asteroids for precious metals? The economics collapse when you calculate extraction costs against market value, especially since nonrenewable resources constitute barely 2.5% of Earth's actual wealth. Perhaps most revealing is the "overview effect" myth-this idea that seeing Earth from space confers profound wisdom. Yet after nearly seventy years of spaceflight and over 600 astronauts, their insights rarely transcend greeting card philosophy about Earth's beauty.