What is *This Could Be Our Future* by Yancey Sticker about?

*This Could Be Our Future* challenges profit-driven societal frameworks, advocating for a shift toward generosity, community, and long-term value. Author Yancey Strickler introduces **Bentoism**, a decision-making model balancing self-interest, societal good, and future consequences. The book critiques financial maximization ("FIML") and proposes redefining success through creative collaboration, ethical systems, and cultural evolution over 30 years.

Who should read *This Could Be Our Future*?

Ideal for entrepreneurs, policymakers, and creatives seeking alternatives to capitalism’s limitations. It appeals to readers interested in ethical business models, systemic change, or frameworks like Bentoism for personal/professional decision-making. Strickler’s Kickstarter co-founder perspective adds relevance for startup founders and social impact leaders.

What is Bentoism in *This Could Be Our Future*?

Bentoism is a four-quadrant framework guiding decisions by weighing **current self**, **future self**, **current others**, and **future others**. It visualizes choices through a "bento box" analogy, encouraging balance between immediate needs and long-term societal impacts. The method aims to reduce short-termism and foster collaborative problem-solving.

How does *This Could Be Our Future* criticize capitalism?

Strickler argues capitalism’s fixation on "financial maximization as life’s primary goal" (FIML) stifles creativity, equity, and sustainability. He highlights Kickstarter’s Public Benefit Corporation model as an alternative, prioritizing social responsibility alongside profit. The book critiques shareholder primacy, advocating for metrics beyond GDP to measure progress.

What are key quotes from *This Could Be Our Future*?

- *"We’ve mistaken a single value (money) for a complete value system."* - *"The future is a series of bento boxes—choices that ripple across time and people."* These emphasize redefining success and intergenerational accountability.

How does *This Could Be Our Future* relate to Kickstarter’s mission?

Strickler ties the book’s themes to Kickstarter’s ethos: democratizing funding for creative projects while operating as a Public Benefit Corporation. The platform’s $8B+ raised for creators exemplifies prioritizing cultural value over pure profit.

What is the “30-year rule” in *This Could Be Our Future*?

Strickler posits that cultural paradigms shift over roughly 30 years, citing examples like environmentalism’s rise. He urges readers to plant seeds for gradual systemic change rather than seeking immediate disruption.

How does *This Could Be Our Future* address personal decision-making?

The book provides exercises to align actions with core values using Bentoism. Readers assess choices through four lenses: **now vs. later** and **self vs. others**, fostering intentionality in career, relationships, and finances.

《这可以是我们的未来》摘要

扬西·斯特里克勒

4.05(782 Reviews)

《这可以是我们的未来》摘要概述

在《这可能就是我们的未来》（*This Could Be Our Future*）一书中，Kickstarter 的联合创始人杨希·斯特里克勒（Yancey Strickler）通过“便当主义”（Bentoism）挑战了我们这个痴迷于财富的社会——这是一个重视社区利益高于利润的框架。该书获得了 54,928 名读者给出 4.10/5 的评分，是一部重塑商业领袖如何定义财务指标之外的成功的宣言。

选择讲述方式

用不同学习方式探索《这可以是我们的未来》摘要

来自《这可以是我们的未来》的相同理念。选择适合你的声音、深度和节奏，随时切换。

第 1 章

Redefining the Future Through Expanded Values

In a world obsessed with financial maximization, Yancey Strickler's vision offers a revolutionary alternative. As co-founder of Kickstarter, Strickler witnessed firsthand how challenging conventional financial wisdom could create remarkable possibilities. His platform has channeled billions of dollars to creative projects that traditional investors would have dismissed as unprofitable. This success story isn't just about a company-it's about reimagining what's possible when we expand our definition of value beyond monetary returns. "This Could Be Our Future" has been praised by thought leaders like Seth Godin and Daniel Pink as a blueprint for a more balanced approach to decision-making. The book arrives at a critical moment when growing inequality and environmental challenges are forcing many to question whether financial maximization has become a destructive force rather than a constructive one. What if our obsession with money is actually limiting human potential rather than expanding it?

第 2 章

The Hidden Default That Shapes Our World

Hidden defaults guide our behavior in ways we rarely notice. Just as retail planners position businesses for right turns because people avoid left turns against traffic, our society contains countless invisible nudges that shape our choices. Consider organ donation rates: neighboring countries Austria (99.98%) and Germany (12%) differ dramatically not because of cultural differences but because Austria defaults citizens to opt-in while Germany defaults to opt-out. We typically follow the path of least resistance. These defaults don't just happen-they develop as people with knowledge and power shape systems to their advantage. Some defaults we can easily adjust, like paperless billing preferences. Others are nearly invisible, like water to fish in David Foster Wallace's famous parable. They become embedded in our customs, traditions, and social codes until we mistake them for natural laws. The most powerful hidden default in modern society is financial maximization-the belief that the rational choice is always the one that makes the most money. This magnetic north pulls our decisions and defines our concept of progress. GDP, our primary metric of success, measures how effectively we maximize financial returns without assessing broader implications. This explains America's bankruptcy-inducing healthcare system, pharmaceutical companies raising prices on existing drugs, and corporations spending more on stock buybacks than R&D or employee wages. As product developers say: you are what you measure. Financial maximization has spread beyond business to dominate education, government, healthcare, and scientific research-institutions once focused on knowledge, service, care, and discovery are increasingly measured by money alone. The concept began innocently with Adam Smith in 1776. In "The Wealth of Nations," he argued that society functions best when people act according to self-interest, with an "invisible hand" maintaining balance between capital, land, and workers. But Smith never advocated for the extreme profit-maximizing behaviors common today. Financial maximization as we know it emerged more recently, particularly through game theory developed in the 1950s by RAND Corporation scientists. Their famous Prisoner's Dilemma scenario demonstrated that betraying your partner was "rational," even though cooperation produced better overall outcomes. This darker interpretation of self-interest fostered distrust rather than Smith's original vision of mutual benefit. The game's structure-isolated interrogation rooms-predetermined its moral. Yet when the same game was called "Community Game" instead of "Wall Street Game," cooperation rates nearly doubled, revealing how powerful framing can be in shaping our perception of what's rational.

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

轻松跟读，《这可以是我们的未来》摘要中的每个词都会随音频实时高亮。

第 3 章

The Homogenization of Everything

In 2017, country singer Sam Hunt's "Body Like a Back Road" topped Billboard's Hot Country Songs chart for an unprecedented 34 consecutive weeks-longer than any song by Elvis, the Beatles, or Madonna. This wasn't a fluke but the logical conclusion of financial maximization making everything increasingly homogeneous. Radio, once a democratic medium where diverse voices could reach audiences across continents, fell victim to corporate consolidation. Initially, Congress limited ownership to just two stations per entity to preserve media diversity. But gradually, these limits were eroded-from two stations to five, then seven, and by 1984 to forty stations. After the 1996 removal of virtually all limits, Clear Channel Communications alone controlled more than 1,200 stations by 2002. Today, just two companies own half of all American radio stations. This consolidation led to massive layoffs, homogenized playlists with stations sharing up to 97% of the same songs, and a dramatic decline in musical diversity. The movie industry has followed a similar path. Of the top ten highest-grossing films in 2017 and 2018, all were sequels or adaptations of existing material. Since multinational conglomerates began purchasing Hollywood studios in the 1980s, the percentage of remakes, sequels, and adaptations has skyrocketed to 61% of all Hollywood movies in the past fifteen years. These corporate owners prioritize financial returns over creative risk-taking, treating films like any other product line with predictable variants. This homogenization extends to our physical landscape. At Second Avenue and First Street in Manhattan's Lower East Side, a TD Bank now stands where Mars Bar, a beloved punk dive, once operated. This transformation exemplifies New York's radical gentrification. From 1910-1960s, average NYC rent grew modestly from $40 to $200 monthly, but from the 1970s-2010s, it exploded from $335 to $3,500. As property values soared, small businesses faced impossible rent hikes-some tripling overnight. National chains, which barely existed in New York before the mid-1990s, now dominate the cityscape. While urban gentrification makes headlines, small towns faced similar devastation through shopping centers. A 1954 tax code change called "accelerated depreciation" transformed commercial real estate into tax shelters, dramatically accelerating mall construction across America. By 1970, the US had thirteen thousand shopping centers, almost all built since the tax change and located outside town centers. From 1954 to 1977, retail in American city centers dropped by 77 percent. When big-box stores like Walmart arrived, they captured 84 percent of their sales from existing local businesses, causing twelve thousand store closures. Despite the popular narrative of a startup revolution, American entrepreneurship rates have plummeted to half of what they were in the 1970s. This isn't from lack of desire-two-thirds of Americans dream of starting businesses-but from the impossibility of competing with established giants. As G.K. Chesterton observed, "Too much capitalism does not mean too many capitalists, but too few."

第 4 章

The Mullet Economy: Business in Front, Party in Back

America's recycling system collapsed in 2018 when China refused to accept our contaminated materials. The problem stemmed from "single-stream" recycling-putting all recyclables in one bin-which replaced the more effective "multistream" approach. While single-stream seemed convenient and reduced collection costs, it produced significantly more contaminated materials. When China raised its standards, American cities were left burning recyclables with nowhere to send them-a perfect example of how short-term financial thinking creates long-term problems. In 1970, economist Milton Friedman published a transformative New York Times op-ed that introduced financial maximization to the mainstream. Writing during a time when businesses faced pressure to address social issues, Friedman argued that corporate social responsibility was a "fundamentally subversive doctrine." He claimed businesses couldn't have real responsibilities because they weren't real people, and declared that "the social responsibility of a business is profit." Friedman's doctrine gave rise to what Strickler calls "the Maximizing Class"-accountants, lawyers, and consultants from elite schools working at firms like Bain, BCG, and McKinsey. These professionals specialized in extracting wealth while minimizing costs. As companies struggled through 1970s economic downturns, they implemented changes including tax avoidance, political lobbying, decreased service quality, wage freezes, budget cuts, and mass layoffs. Three years after Friedman's essay, wages stagnated for most Americans. While productivity continued to climb, compensation flatlined. From 1948-1973, hourly compensation grew 91%, but from 1973-2013, it grew just 9.2%. When families struggled with stagnant wages, credit cards emerged as a solution. Credit card debt in America went from effectively zero in 1966 to $55 billion by 1980 and $1 trillion by 2018. As Strickler puts it: "This is where the pay raises went. They became debt." This created what Strickler calls "the Mullet Economy": cost-cutting "business in front" for most people, financial windfalls "party in back" for the top 10%. The two-step process involves companies first cutting costs through wage freezes and layoffs, then redistributing the "saved" cash to executives and shareholders. Since stock buybacks were legalized in 1982, they've grown dramatically, reaching over $1 trillion in 2018. Many American companies now spend more on buybacks than on R&D. Some of the biggest victims of the Mullet Economy are college students taking on record debt to enter a workforce with stagnant wages. While college tuition has increased nineteenfold since 1971 to $34,740, student debt has ballooned to $1.4 trillion, up 150% in just ten years. Nearly a third of borrowers are in default or forbearance, unable to keep up with payments. Politics has also been corrupted by financial maximization. Research from 2015 revealed that elections are decided almost entirely by money, with a direct ratio between campaign spending and vote share. The majority of political funding comes from large corporations, executives, and the wealthiest 1% of Americans. In exchange for contributions, politicians weaken regulations, expand tax loopholes, and undercut government functions that might limit financial maximization.

从《这可以是我们的未来》摘要中收获更多

每日获取新洞见，探索 10 万+ 条课程内容
文字实时高亮，与音频同步
保存你的书库，在所有设备上随时访问

第 5 章

The Trap of Perpetual Anxiety

Despite his success at Kickstarter, Strickler struggled with self-doubt, comparing himself to the cutthroat CEO ideal portrayed in business magazines. Standing in line at a grocery store, he noticed a Harvard Business Review with aggressive phrases like "Be paranoid," "Disrupt yourself," and "Go to war." This militaristic, aggressive tone pervades modern business culture-headlines about "wars" for tech dominance, CEOs "out for blood," and Silicon Valley "casualties"-reflecting the combative mindset that financial maximization encourages. Since 1966, UCLA's Higher Education Research Institute has surveyed college freshmen about their values and life goals. In 1967, "develop a meaningful philosophy of life" topped the list at 85%, while "be very well off financially" ranked seventh at 41%. By 2016, these priorities had dramatically reversed-82% of freshmen considered being rich essential, while developing a meaningful philosophy of life dropped to 46%. This shift began in the mid-1970s, reflecting the normalization of financial maximization. Adam Smith noted that society's tendency to worship the rich and powerful while neglecting the poor was "necessary" to maintain social order. In today's business world, our role models are successful wealthy people who achieved their dreams and made millions. We base our self-worth on external validation, imagining these external goals as destinations that will solve our problems. But research shows that achieving "extrinsic" goals like wealth and recognition leads to increased anxiety and depression compared to achieving "intrinsic" goals focused on learning and helping others. During the Internet 2.0 era, fast growth and big valuations defined success. A New York Times profile of Zenefits celebrated its rapid growth and $4.5 billion valuation while ignoring the CEO's alarming statements about being "petrified" and feeling like "the wheels are ready to come off." A year later, he was fired for violating regulations to maintain growth rates demanded by investors. Once companies invite financial maximization inside, they become trapped by their choices, prioritizing immediate gains over long-term sustainability. The trap of financial maximization keeps us perpetually anxious, always chasing the next goal without finding lasting satisfaction. Despite the seeming permanence of the current system, even Milton Friedman's now-dominant idea was once just a proposition that required persuasion. History continues to evolve, and alternatives are possible.

第 6 章

Expanding Our Definition of Value

Maslow's hierarchy of needs helps explain money's proper role in our lives. Financial security functions as a foundational safety need in modern society-as fundamental as physical safety, but still "low" on Maslow's pyramid. Daniel Kahneman's research confirms this, showing happiness increases with income only up to about $75,000 annually-the point of financial security. Beyond this threshold, additional money produces diminishing returns. This creates a trap in financial maximization: as someone accumulates more money, each additional dollar means less. Many successful people reach this realization but struggle with what comes next, as society provides little guidance for moving beyond financial security toward love, esteem, and self-actualization. Financial maximization assumes that by growing money, everything else follows. But research contradicts this. Daniel Pink cites a Carnegie Mellon study showing that introducing money as motivation actually decreased enjoyment and intrinsic interest in activities. When participants were paid to make shapes with blocks and then the payment was removed, they played less than those who were never paid at all. Money transformed a joyful activity into a transaction. Pink identifies three higher drives that truly motivate us: autonomy (control over what we do), mastery (improving our skills), and purpose (meaning behind our actions). These values, which align with Maslow's higher tiers, suggest that basing decisions on non-financial values is rational and expands our potential. For a century, we've measured value through GDP, tracking money spent by businesses, consumers, and government. But economist Simon Kuznets, who introduced GDP after the Great Depression, warned about its limitations. GDP doesn't account for "the intensity and unpleasantness of effort" required to earn income, nor does it distinguish between beneficial and harmful spending. A thousand dollars spent on a family vacation counts the same as a thousand dollars spent on divorce attorneys. Though "value" and "values" appear similar, they represent distinct concepts. Value (singular) is monetary worth-quantitative and measurable-while values (plural) represent ideals and principles-qualitative and harder to measure. The economic perspective offers convenience through money's universal language. As financial maximization grew dominant, society shifted from focusing on values (what's meaningful) to focusing on value (what maximizes money).

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

轻松跟读，《这可以是我们的未来》摘要中的每个词都会随音频实时高亮。

第 7 章

Bentoism: A Framework for Balanced Decision-Making

While we typically focus on maximizing immediate self-interest-visualized as a hockey stick graph going up and to the right-there's a larger universe we miss. Our decisions affect not just ourselves now, but our future selves and our communities. Bentoism (named after the Japanese bento box meal) expands our view of self-interest across two axes: Time (now to future) and Self-Interest (me to us). This creates four spaces: Now Me, Now Us, Future Me, and Future Us-each representing a valid perspective that impacts our decisions. Applying Bentoism to the Prisoner's Dilemma reveals why the RAND secretaries chose loyalty over betrayal. Each perspective in the Bento offers a different answer: Now Me wants to avoid jail at all costs; Now Us considers our partner and favors solidarity; Future Me considers our values and what we'll regret; and Future Us envisions the world we want to create. The secretaries chose Now Us over Now Me because their values guided them to do so. In Pulp Fiction, Butch's seemingly irrational decision to risk his life retrieving his father's gold watch illustrates Bentoism in action. In a deleted scene, Butch debates with himself, weighing different perspectives: Now Me says leave ("It's just a watch"); Now Us thinks of his lover Fabienne; Future Me reminds him of his values ("This watch is a symbol"); and Future Us connects him to his family legacy. This internal debate resembles checking a Bento box, where the decision ultimately comes from balancing immediate self-interest against deeper values. Financial maximization simplifies our complex world into a single goal, but Bentoism offers a more nuanced approach. Like the screwdriver expanding possibilities beyond the hammer, Bentoism functions as a values processor with each quadrant containing core values. Now Me values security, pleasure, and autonomy; Now Us emphasizes community, fairness, and tradition; Future Me prioritizes mastery, purpose, and grit; while Future Us champions awareness, sustainability, and knowledge.

第 8 章

Values Maximization in Action

When Adele announced her first tour in four years, she faced a common problem: scalpers buying up tickets to resell at massive markups. Rather than maximizing profits, Adele partnered with Songkick to distribute 40% of tickets to her most loyal fans at fair prices. This algorithm-powered approach reduced scalping by 90% and saved fans an estimated $6.5 million. Instead of financially maximizing, Adele was fairness maximizing-optimizing for her values as a person and artist while still running a profitable tour. The NBA's transformation through the three-point shot illustrates how discovering new forms of value changes how we play the game. Though introduced in 1979, the three-pointer was initially dismissed as inefficient and selfish since it had a lower success rate than two-point shots. But when data analysts in the 2000s began measuring shot efficiency with new technologies and metrics, they discovered that three-pointers were actually more valuable over time. Despite establishment skepticism, teams that embraced this approach outperformed expectations, completely transforming basketball within a decade. Balancing money's influence isn't a new concept. Religious traditions have long used the Sabbath as a structural break to preserve time for rest and worship beyond money's reach. Despite most blue laws being reversed today, Chick-fil-A still closes on Sundays, sacrificing an estimated $1 billion annually. While financially irrational, this choice reflects a Bentoist perspective-optimizing for values beyond money, which contributes to their popularity as both a restaurant and workplace. For followers of the Financial Independence Retire Early (FIRE) movement, value comes from not spending money on unnecessary things. These primarily Millennial adherents focus on happiness rather than luxury, creating radical budgets that allow them to save aggressively toward early retirement. FIRE demonstrates how money can be respected while not being the only value that matters. Expanding values beyond financial maximization isn't theoretical-it's already happening. When Kickstarter became a public benefit corporation in 2015, it codified commitments beyond shareholder value, including pledges not to use tax loopholes, to support artists in less commercial areas, and to donate 5% of after-tax profits to arts education and fighting inequality. Patagonia exemplifies Future Us thinking through its public benefit corporation charter, which includes the remarkable pledge to share proprietary information with direct competitors when doing so might benefit the environment. In 2014, after spending four years developing a sustainable biorubber for wetsuits, they shared the material with competitors. Similarly, Tesla released all its patents publicly in 2015, recognizing that their competition wasn't other electric carmakers but the "enormous flood of gasoline cars" that threatened climate stability.

从《这可以是我们的未来》摘要中收获更多

每日获取新洞见，探索 10 万+ 条课程内容
文字实时高亮，与音频同步
保存你的书库，在所有设备上随时访问

第 9 章

The Thirty-Year Theory of Change

Jeff Bezos shared a story about a friend learning to do a perfect handstand. Her coach advised that mastering a handstand takes six months of daily practice, not the two weeks most people expect. This unrealistic expectation leads to quitting. When we underestimate effort required, we cut corners and give up. But with realistic expectations and planning, we have a chance at success. While we crave instant change, evidence suggests substantive shifts in majority viewpoints take about thirty years. Joseph Lister's antiseptic method took thirty years to go from controversial to standard practice. The NBA's three-point shot, introduced in 1979, took thirty years to become essential to the game. Milton Friedman's financial maximization philosophy went from fringe to dominant in the same timeframe. Hungarian philosopher Karl Mannheim observed that society changes because new people are born while others die-a continuous transfer of cultural heritage. Life resembles a party where newcomers learn the rules, adults control the festivities, and eventually people leave while the party continues. This turnover happens quickly-in thirty years, a third of today's population will be gone and half the larger future population will be new. Change emerges in response to crisis-television inspired exercise, and surgery deaths led to antiseptics. Recycling illustrates this pattern perfectly. Before the 20th century, little was meant to be discarded, but consumerism created mounting garbage problems. Oregon started the first modern recycling program in 1970, and by the 1990s, recycling became mandatory in many cities. Similarly, organic food evolved from niche health stores in the 1980s to mainstream availability after FDA standards were established in 2000. The year 2050-thirty years from now-represents a generation away from our present moment. This timeframe matters because it's how long it typically takes for revolutionary ideas to become normal parts of life. If a Bentoist movement continues growing, 2050 is when we might expect a meaningful shift in how society values things.

第 10 章

Creating a Values Maximizing Future

John Maynard Keynes, founder of macroeconomics, championed capitalism while recognizing its limitations. In his 1930 essay "Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren," he predicted that after about 100 years of necessary greed and avarice, humanity could move beyond money worship. That hundred-year mark is approaching now. From 1946 to 1973, America experienced unprecedented prosperity with median pay increasing 91% and family incomes doubling. But when financial maximization took over, the focus shifted from collective prosperity to individual gain. Forty years later, America has the world's highest wealth inequality, stagnant wages since 1973, and CEOs earning 271 times more than average workers. Had America continued its pre-financial-maximization trajectory, workers would earn more, executives would still prosper (though less extravagantly), public services would be better funded, and society would be stronger overall. We're trapped under financial maximization's limitations, but we can free ourselves by acknowledging how expansive our universe of value truly is. If this broader perspective became normal, companies would repair products rather than replace them, CEOs might pay themselves less and workers more, and we could satisfy financial needs while prioritizing deeper values. Many of us struggle to articulate our values because we're too busy pursuing financial security. The Bento begins with a blank piece of paper, drawing a box with four quadrants and asking simple questions: What do I want and need? What does my future self want and need? What do we want and need? What does future us want and need? After brainstorming responses and finding themes, the Bento reveals one's true values and purpose. Organizations must evolve beyond mere financial targets to embrace Bentoist values while maintaining profitability. Companies with clear secular missions-like those focused on environmental impact-should be willing to sacrifice some profit to fulfill their values-based commitments, making these missions as consequential as financial concerns. By 2050, a Bentoist approach to value could become mainstream. The Values Maximizing Class-comprised of diverse professionals from accountants to venture capitalists-would identify, measure, and grow rational, non-financial values. Their research might reveal three paths to value growth: creating new value in new things, new value in existing things, and growing existing value in existing things. The Values Helix illustrates how values pass through generations. Each generation's values and relationships directly influence the next, creating a continuous chain of values transmission across time. We each have responsibility to consciously shape which values change and which endure, recognizing that meaningful transformation happens gradually. Eventually, financial maximization will diminish as our dominant value, replaced by an expanded view that shifts from rational self-interest to rational self-coherence-a destination worth turning left for.

★★★★★

你已读完《这可以是我们的未来》摘要

“坚持使用 23 天了，我每天都会打开它。它现在已经成为我的日常习惯。”

jayallen

《这可以是我们的未来》摘要中的核心主题

financial maximization
value pluralism
hidden defaults
corporate consolidation
beyond gdp

《这可以是我们的未来》摘要精选金句

You are what you measure.
We typically follow the path of least resistance.
Financial maximization has become a destructive force.
Too much capitalism does not mean too many capitalists, but too few.
What if our obsession with money is actually limiting human potential?

《这可以是我们的未来》摘要中的人物

Yancey StricklerAuthor and co-founder of Kickstarter
Sam HuntCountry singer used as a case study
David Foster WallaceWriter mentioned for his 'water to fish' parable

关于作者

《这可能是我们的未来：一个更慷慨世界的宣言》（This Could Be Our Future: A Manifesto for a More Generous World）的作者扬西·斯特里克勒（Yancey Strickler）是一位企业家和远见卓识者，以重新构想超越利润的社会价值而闻名。斯特里克勒出生于弗吉尼亚州农村，现居纽约市。他联合创立了先驱性的众筹平台 Kickstarter，该平台已帮助创作者获得了超过 80 亿美元的资金，巩固了他作为创意创新领域领导者的声誉。

他的作品探讨了后资本主义、集体价值和伦理体系等主题，这些探索深受其乐评人背景以及他开发的“便当主义”（Bentoism）框架的影响——这是一种强调长期相互依存关系的决策模型。

斯特里克勒的见解曾刊登在《华尔街日报》、《时代周刊》以及《埃兹拉·克莱恩秀》（The Ezra Klein Show）中，而他在现代艺术博物馆（MoMA）和斯坦福大学等机构的演讲进一步扩大了他的影响力。他联合创办了 The Creative Independent，目前领导着重新定义协作创作的平台 Metalabel。

他 2024 年的作品包括《互联网的黑暗森林文集》（The Dark Forest Anthology of the Internet）和《九个创意冥想》（Nine Creative Meditations），扩展了他对数字文化的探索。《这可能是我们的未来》已以五种语言出版，它将哲学的深度与可操作的策略相结合，确立了斯特里克勒作为重塑现代经济和创意范式的关键发声者的地位。

下载《这可以是我们的未来》摘要

免费获取《这可以是我们的未来》摘要的 PDF 或 EPUB 版本。可打印或随时离线阅读。

用户还喜欢

Prosperity

Colin Mayer

Inventing the Future

Nick Srnicek

Future of Capitalism

Paul Collier

The intention economy

Doc Searls

What We Owe the Future

William MacAskill

Competing for the Future

Gary Hamel

You Will Own Nothing

Carol Roth

The Price of Everything: A Parable of Possibility and Prosperity

Russell Roberts

关于《这可以是我们的未来》摘要的常见问题

发现更多

学习计划

Philosophy for the Entrepreneurial Pivot

This plan is essential for founders who feel disconnected from their 'why' or paralyzed by the lack of data in new markets. It is designed for entrepreneurs seeking a deeper intellectual foundation to guide their strategic shifts and ethical leadership.

2 h 18 m•3 章节

学习计划

The Existentialist Roadmap to Freedom

This plan is essential for individuals feeling trapped by societal expectations or existential dread, offering a path to radical self-ownership. It is designed for deep thinkers and aspiring leaders who want to build a life of authenticity and purpose beyond conventional norms.

2 h•4 章节

学习计划

Economics for Future Leaders

This plan provides a foundational toolkit for aspiring decision-makers to understand the invisible forces shaping our world. It is ideal for students and professionals who want to bridge the gap between abstract economic theory and practical financial literacy.

1 h 45 m•3 章节

学习计划

The Billionaire Mindset: From Frustration to Manifestation

This plan is designed for ambitious professionals feeling stuck in their current career trajectory. It bridges the gap between emotional intelligence and strategic execution, making it essential for anyone ready to transition from frustration to high-level success.

3 h•4 章节

学习计划

Zero to One for Young Founders

This plan is essential for aspiring entrepreneurs who want to build companies that create something entirely new rather than just iterating on existing ideas. It is designed for young founders seeking to master the strategic mechanics of vertical progress and long-term planning.

1 h 30 m•3 章节

学习计划

The Founder Mindset: Persuasion and Resilience

This learning plan is designed for aspiring entrepreneurs and early-stage founders who need to bridge the gap between technical skill and business leadership. It provides the psychological tools and tactical frameworks necessary to survive the volatile journey of building a company from scratch.

2 h•4 章节

学习计划

The Game of Abundance

This plan is essential for individuals feeling trapped by financial stress or the exhaustion of constant mental battles. It offers a paradigm shift for those seeking to replace scarcity-driven survival with a strategic, spiritual approach to prosperity.

1 h 30 m•3 章节

学习计划

The Architecture of a Fearless Life

This plan is essential for professionals and seekers struggling with burnout, anxiety about the future, or the pressure of high-stakes results. It offers a blueprint for building resilience by integrating ancient wisdom into modern daily routines, making it ideal for anyone looking to find stability in an unpredictable world.

1 h 30 m•3 章节

由哥伦比亚大学校友创建 | 源自旧金山

BeFreed 汇聚全球求知若渴的学习者

4.7

平均评分

7,840+ 条 App 评分

BeFreed 社区

说真的，我还没把这个 app 完全摸透，但用了这几天已经被惊艳到了… BeFreed 和我用过的任何学习类 app 都不在一个层级。它让人特别投入，还能实实在在地提升专注力，对刷手机停不下来的人来说太合适了！

@ladyInfinity

我买 BeFreed 正好 23 天，从那以后每天都在用。它已经完全融入了我的日常工作流和学习习惯。

@jayallen

说实话，这个 app 超出了我所有的预期。我可以让它就任何主题生成音频，无论是什么，效果都很惊艳。我的专业领域是心理治疗方向，而且是多学科交叉的，但它给出的内容非常准确。

@Raguipa

我最感激的是它大大减少了我刷手机的时间——花在搜索上的时间少了，吸收信息的时间多了。完整有声书、播客加上学习计划的组合，真的很出色。

@colonyofcreatorsNGO

我做 PhotoReading 快速学习讲师已经 24 年了… 书籍、阅读和学习就是我的本行，而 BeFreed 用一种创新的方式，把知识变得特别容易吸收，做得非常出色。

@BeFreed user

它不只是一个书籍摘要 app。我用过「有趣」这个阅读模式，比传统方式的摘要好得多，理解观点也更容易，光这一点就值回票价。

@austinakon

我爱这个 app。用了几天，完全停不下来。作为开始，再好不过了。

@jcrules328

我真的很喜欢这个产品；已经试用了大概一个月，感觉挖到宝了。它特别好用，因为我可以用 BeFreed 创建自己想学的主题，声音也很棒，旁白选择多到用不完。

@DanielCZ

说真的，我还没把这个 app 完全摸透，但用了这几天已经被惊艳到了… BeFreed 和我用过的任何学习类 app 都不在一个层级。它让人特别投入，还能实实在在地提升专注力，对刷手机停不下来的人来说太合适了！

@ladyInfinity

我买 BeFreed 正好 23 天，从那以后每天都在用。它已经完全融入了我的日常工作流和学习习惯。

@jayallen

说实话，这个 app 超出了我所有的预期。我可以让它就任何主题生成音频，无论是什么，效果都很惊艳。我的专业领域是心理治疗方向，而且是多学科交叉的，但它给出的内容非常准确。

@Raguipa

我最感激的是它大大减少了我刷手机的时间——花在搜索上的时间少了，吸收信息的时间多了。完整有声书、播客加上学习计划的组合，真的很出色。

@colonyofcreatorsNGO

我做 PhotoReading 快速学习讲师已经 24 年了… 书籍、阅读和学习就是我的本行，而 BeFreed 用一种创新的方式，把知识变得特别容易吸收，做得非常出色。

@BeFreed user

它不只是一个书籍摘要 app。我用过「有趣」这个阅读模式，比传统方式的摘要好得多，理解观点也更容易，光这一点就值回票价。

@austinakon

我爱这个 app。用了几天，完全停不下来。作为开始，再好不过了。

@jcrules328

我真的很喜欢这个产品；已经试用了大概一个月，感觉挖到宝了。它特别好用，因为我可以用 BeFreed 创建自己想学的主题，声音也很棒，旁白选择多到用不完。

@DanielCZ

我特别喜欢它能把有用的信息和想法浓缩成 8-15 分钟的播客式音频。我本来不太爱听播客，因为废话太多，但它把这些全都去掉了。

@BeFreed user

我正在读博士的最后阶段，需要读大量不熟悉的材料… 用 BeFreed，只要输入一个提示，app 就会帮你找到源材料并生成一期音频播客。我觉得 BeFreed 的流程比 NotebookLM 更顺畅。

@Brad

我经常在做早餐、散步、通勤的时候上 YouTube 找点东西听，而 BeFreed 提供了更有针对性的选择，没有广告，也没有废话！

@BeFreed user

这个平台最棒的地方是它的多面性。真的没有任何主题是它讲不了的，你丢给它什么它都能处理… 很少能找到一个毫无限制、又真正兑现承诺的学习工具。

@jayallen

BeFreed 太棒了。界面好用，让我花在找功能上的时间更少，花在学习上的时间更多。有声书、播客和学习计划的组合是天才设计，彻底改变了我的日常。

@BeFreed user

一开始我花了点时间才弄明白怎么生成意大利语的播客，然后就——哇！太棒了！我可以让它讲解任何一个话题，它讲得又好又聪明！

@matteo77

BeFreed 已经成了我每天都用的有声书 app… 我最喜欢的是，把自己的文字放进去，它就能生成随时随地都能听的音频。

@kotanzu1

我特别喜欢它能把有用的信息和想法浓缩成 8-15 分钟的播客式音频。我本来不太爱听播客，因为废话太多，但它把这些全都去掉了。

@BeFreed user

我正在读博士的最后阶段，需要读大量不熟悉的材料… 用 BeFreed，只要输入一个提示，app 就会帮你找到源材料并生成一期音频播客。我觉得 BeFreed 的流程比 NotebookLM 更顺畅。

@Brad

我经常在做早餐、散步、通勤的时候上 YouTube 找点东西听，而 BeFreed 提供了更有针对性的选择，没有广告，也没有废话！

@BeFreed user

这个平台最棒的地方是它的多面性。真的没有任何主题是它讲不了的，你丢给它什么它都能处理… 很少能找到一个毫无限制、又真正兑现承诺的学习工具。

@jayallen

BeFreed 太棒了。界面好用，让我花在找功能上的时间更少，花在学习上的时间更多。有声书、播客和学习计划的组合是天才设计，彻底改变了我的日常。

@BeFreed user

一开始我花了点时间才弄明白怎么生成意大利语的播客，然后就——哇！太棒了！我可以让它讲解任何一个话题，它讲得又好又聪明！

@matteo77

BeFreed 已经成了我每天都用的有声书 app… 我最喜欢的是，把自己的文字放进去，它就能生成随时随地都能听的音频。

@kotanzu1

查看更多网络上关于 BeFreed 的讨论

开启你的学习之旅，就是现在

第 4 章

《这可以是我们的未来》摘要

《这可以是我们的未来》摘要概述

用不同学习方式探索《这可以是我们的未来》摘要

Redefining the Future Through Expanded Values

The Hidden Default That Shapes Our World

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

The Homogenization of Everything

The Mullet Economy: Business in Front, Party in Back

从《这可以是我们的未来》摘要中收获更多

The Trap of Perpetual Anxiety

Expanding Our Definition of Value

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

Bentoism: A Framework for Balanced Decision-Making

Values Maximization in Action

从《这可以是我们的未来》摘要中收获更多

The Thirty-Year Theory of Change

Creating a Values Maximizing Future

你已读完《这可以是我们的未来》摘要

《这可以是我们的未来》摘要中的核心主题

《这可以是我们的未来》摘要精选金句

《这可以是我们的未来》摘要中的人物

关于作者

下载《这可以是我们的未来》摘要

用户还喜欢

关于《这可以是我们的未来》摘要的常见问题

What is This Could Be Our Future by Yancey Sticker about?

Who should read This Could Be Our Future?

What is Bentoism in This Could Be Our Future?

How does This Could Be Our Future criticize capitalism?

发现更多

BeFreed 汇聚全球求知若渴的学习者

用不同学习方式探索《这可以是我们的未来》摘要

Redefining the Future Through Expanded Values

The Hidden Default That Shapes Our World

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

The Homogenization of Everything

The Mullet Economy: Business in Front, Party in Back

从《这可以是我们的未来》摘要中收获更多

The Trap of Perpetual Anxiety

Expanding Our Definition of Value

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

Bentoism: A Framework for Balanced Decision-Making

Values Maximization in Action

从《这可以是我们的未来》摘要中收获更多

The Thirty-Year Theory of Change

Creating a Values Maximizing Future

你已读完《这可以是我们的未来》摘要

用户还喜欢

发现更多