What is *The Economists' Hour* by Binyamin Appelbaum about?

*The Economists' Hour* examines how economists reshaped global policy from 1969 to 2008, advocating free markets, deregulation, and globalization. Appelbaum critiques how their influence prioritized efficiency over equity, leading to income inequality, corporate dominance, and environmental neglect. The book blends historical analysis with case studies on topics like inflation fighting and tax policies, arguing for rebalancing economic priorities.

Who should read *The Economists' Hour*?

This book suits readers interested in economic history, policy-making, and critiques of free-market ideology. Policymakers, students of economics, and anyone seeking to understand the roots of modern inequality or the 2008 financial crisis will find it valuable. Appelbaum’s journalistic style makes complex ideas accessible to non-experts.

Is *The Economists' Hour* worth reading?

Yes, for its incisive critique of economic policymaking’s unintended consequences. Appelbaum’s rigorous research and engaging storytelling reveal how technocratic decisions eroded social safety nets and amplified corporate power. It’s particularly relevant for debates on climate policy, antitrust laws, and wealth redistribution in the 2020s.

What are the main arguments in *The Economists' Hour*?

Appelbaum argues that economists overly prioritized markets, leading to: - **Deregulation**: Weakened consumer and environmental protections. - **Globalization**: Accelerated job displacement without safety nets. - **Tax cuts**: Short-term growth at the expense of infrastructure and education. He contrasts these outcomes with the promised efficiency gains, highlighting systemic fractures.

How does *The Economists' Hour* critique Milton Friedman’s ideas?

The book challenges Friedman’s belief that markets self-correct, citing examples like the 2008 crisis and rising inequality. Appelbaum argues Friedman’s influence led policymakers to undervalue government’s role in addressing market failures, particularly in labor rights and environmental regulation.

What historical events does Appelbaum highlight in *The Economists' Hour*?

Key moments include: - Paul Volcker’s inflation-fighting policies at the Federal Reserve. - The repeal of Glass-Steagall, contributing to financial instability. - The rise of cost-benefit analysis in regulatory decisions. These examples illustrate economists’ growing authority over public policy.

How does *The Economists' Hour* address income inequality?

Appelbaum links deregulation and tax policies to widening wealth gaps. He notes how prioritizing shareholder value and free trade suppressed wages while enriching corporations. The book advocates reviving antitrust enforcement and progressive taxation to rebalance economic power.

What quotes from *The Economists' Hour* are significant?

Notable lines include: - **“Efficiency became the overriding goal, but not everyone benefited.”** - **“Markets need rules, and rules require democratic oversight.”** These emphasize Appelbaum’s call for reining in unfettered capitalism.

《经济学家的时代》摘要

宾亚明·阿佩尔鲍姆

4.09(1696 Reviews)

《经济学家的时代》摘要概述

经济学家如何在 40 年间劫持了美国政策，承诺繁荣却带来了不平等。阿佩尔鲍姆（Appelbaum）在《纽约时报》广受赞誉的揭秘中，揭示了自由市场理论如何使从华尔街到智利的全球社会陷入分裂。这本书让决策者们开始反思：我们是否赋予了经济学家过大的权力？

选择讲述方式

用不同学习方式探索《经济学家的时代》摘要

来自《经济学家的时代》的相同理念。选择适合你的声音、深度和节奏，随时切换。

第 1 章

When Markets Ruled the World

In the early 1950s, a young economist named Paul Volcker worked as a human calculator at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, with little hope for advancement in an institution that kept economists in the basement. The American elite widely distrusted economists then - from FDR dismissing Keynes as an impractical "mathematician" to Eisenhower warning against technocratic control. But a revolution was brewing. Market-oriented economists were about to rise to unprecedented influence, transforming government, business, and everyday life in ways that continue to shape our world today. "The Economists' Hour" by Binyamin Appelbaum chronicles this remarkable transformation from 1969 to 2008, when economists led efforts to curb taxation, deregulate industries, and promote globalization. The book has become required reading in policy circles, with former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers acknowledging its importance despite disagreeing with some conclusions. Even Barack Obama included it on his 2019 reading list, recognizing how these economic ideas fundamentally reshaped American society - for better and worse.

第 2 章

The Rise of Market Fundamentalism

Milton Friedman, a small man with large glasses and boyish enthusiasm, became one of the twentieth century's most influential ideologues. His central belief was simple: open markets represented the best system of human governance, far superior to traditional government, which should be minimized. A formidable academic who won the Nobel Prize in 1976, Friedman was also a masterful communicator who reshaped economic thinking worldwide. Born to immigrant parents in Brooklyn in 1912, Friedman grew up in Rahway, New Jersey, where his family owned various small businesses. After studying at Rutgers University, he shifted from mathematics to economics during the Great Depression. Ironically, Friedman and his future wife Rose Director found employment through New Deal programs that created a "boom market for economists" in Washington. During WWII, Friedman worked for the Treasury Department, where he helped create tax withholding, which Rose never forgave him for. Friedman's first major policy victory came through ending military conscription. In 1967, Martin Anderson, a libertarian economics professor connected to Richard Nixon's inner circle, proposed ending the draft based on Friedman's ideas. Friedman argued for an all-volunteer military recruited through competitive wages rather than forced service. Despite warnings from advisers that ending the draft might alienate conservative voters, Nixon embraced the proposal, calling the draft "one of the severest and most unfair restraints on the free market." The transition faced significant resistance in Congress. House Armed Services Committee Chairman F. Edward Hebert famously quipped, "The only way to get an all-volunteer army is to draft it." Many war opponents still valued conscription as a civic institution, with Senator Thomas Eagleton warning that ending the draft would make war "the business of the poor." Nevertheless, the legislation narrowly passed, with the last draft call occurring on June 30, 1973. This shift fundamentally changed Americans' relationship with military service. The all-volunteer force, supplemented by contractors in equal numbers during recent conflicts, has made war more remote from most Americans' lives. As predicted, "increased taxes generate far more public discussion than increased draft calls," allowing war to become a permanent, low-grade conflict commanding little public attention.

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

轻松跟读，《经济学家的时代》中的每个词都会随音频实时高亮。

第 3 章

The Battle Against Inflation

In December 1933, amid the Great Depression, John Maynard Keynes published an open letter in the New York Times urging President Roosevelt to embark on government spending to stimulate the economy. This challenged the prevailing view that government borrowing and spending was merely "moving money from the left pocket to the right pocket." Keynes argued markets wouldn't automatically deliver optimal outcomes - businesses uncertain about the future would refrain from investing and people would remain unemployed. His 1936 book "The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money" revolutionized economics, particularly influencing younger economists like Paul Samuelson. By the late 1950s, economists made increasingly bold claims about managing the economy. Samuelson and Solow suggested governments could choose from a "menu" of unemployment and inflation rates using the Phillips curve. In Britain, economists debated whether unemployment should be limited to 1.25% or 1.75%, with anyone suggesting 2.5% "regarded as, more or less, a Nazi." The Kennedy administration embraced Keynesian economics, particularly through Walter W. Heller, who became Council of Economic Advisers chairman. Heller persistently argued for tax cuts to promote job growth, describing the gap between actual and potential economic output as roughly "the size of the Italian economy." This marked a tactical shift from traditional Keynesian emphasis on government spending to tax cuts that would return money to the private sector - an approach that appealed to conservatives who preferred smaller government. Kennedy's tax cut delivered on its promise - growth surged as Americans spent their windfall, and unemployment dropped to around 3.5% by the late 1960s. The expansion created optimism that "modern economics" could perpetuate endless growth. In 1965, Time put Keynes on its cover, crediting his ideas for "the most sizable, prolonged and widely distributed prosperity in history." However, the Keynesian triumph proved short-lived. By late 1965, the economy began overheating and inflation rising. The administration's aggressive growth stimulation and Vietnam War spending demonstrated that adding too much fuel to an economic fire causes it to burn out of control. Milton Friedman built a counterrevolution case, arguing that governments should return to the pre-Keynesian consensus that they couldn't stimulate economic growth. Friedman's 1967 presidential address to the American Economic Association explained that printing money could boost employment and growth only by tricking people. Once people realized what happened, maintaining growth would require printing even more money, leading to accelerating inflation. By the mid-1970s, Americans faced "stagflation" - simultaneous high unemployment and inflation. The 1973 oil embargo triggered the worst downturn since the Depression. Ford's "WIN" (Whip Inflation Now) campaign failed as unemployment reached 9% while inflation exceeded 10%. Friedman's explanation was simple: unemployment rose because the economy was weak, while inflation persisted because government kept printing money. As Keynesian economics faltered, interest in Friedman's ideas grew. Germany's Bundesbank adopted monetarist principles in 1974, and Friedman won the 1976 Nobel Prize.

第 4 章

The Volcker Revolution

Paul Volcker, standing six-foot-seven with a perpetually grumpy expression, brought intellectual heft and anti-inflation conviction to the Federal Reserve. Born in 1927 in Teaneck, New Jersey, Volcker was educated at Princeton where Austrian emigres who had witnessed post-WWI hyperinflation shaped his economic thinking. His 1949 senior thesis warned about "the disastrous effects of a sharp price rise" and the need to control the money supply - foreshadowing his later policies. When Carter appointed him Fed chairman in 1979, Volcker was clear about his intentions to tighten monetary policy. By then, inflation had eroded the dollar's value to 39 cents compared to 1970. At his confirmation hearing, Volcker offered no comfort to those worried about high interest rates, stating firmly, "I don't think we have any substitute for seeking an answer to our problems in the context of monetary discipline." On October 6, 1979, Volcker announced the Fed would adopt monetarism - focusing on controlling the money supply rather than interest rates. This technical shift carried a powerful message: unlike previous anti-inflation campaigns that had been abandoned when the economy began to suffer, Volcker intended to "slay the inflationary dragon" regardless of short-term pain. Interest rates soon climbed above 20%, triggering a severe recession that cost millions their jobs, homes, and retirement security. The execution was painful. Factory workers suffered most, with unemployment reaching 23% in the auto industry and 29% among steelworkers. When Fed governor Nancy Teeters asked how much harder they needed to squeeze the money supply, her colleague Emmett Rice simply replied, "We don't know. We will keep bringing it down until we find out." As Americans suffered, they sent Volcker keys to unsold cars and wooden beams from unbuilt homes. A Kentucky builders' association published a wanted poster accusing him of "Murder of the American Dream." When Ronald Reagan delivered his first inaugural address in January 1981, over 8 million Americans were unemployed, yet he focused primarily on inflation as the nation's greatest economic threat. Unlike Carter who blamed the American people's profligacy, Reagan blamed government spending, embracing monetarism as his economic philosophy. By summer 1982, Volcker began easing his anti-inflation campaign, telling Congress "the inflationary tide has turned in a fundamental way." As interest rates fell, the economy rebounded, and Reagan celebrated "morning in America." But the victory came at a permanent cost - the median income of full-time male workers in 1978 ($54,392 in inflation-adjusted terms) would not be matched or exceeded in the next four decades. Ironically, monetarism itself didn't survive its own success. The Fed quietly abandoned monetary targets when Friedman's assumption about the stability of money velocity proved wrong. Despite these implementation failures, Friedman had won the ideological war. Central banks now played the dominant role in macroeconomic policy, focusing primarily on controlling inflation even at the expense of unemployment.

从《经济学家的时代》中收获更多

每日获取新洞见，探索 10 万+ 条课程内容
文字实时高亮，与音频同步
保存你的书库，在所有设备上随时访问

第 5 章

The Tax Revolution

In April 1971, University of Chicago economist Robert Mundell shocked colleagues by claiming that both inflation and unemployment could be solved simultaneously without pain through substantial tax cuts. The proposal was met with incredulity from both Keynesians and monetarists. Yet within a decade, his radical idea would move from academic fringe to mainstream Republican economic ideology. Jack Kemp, former Buffalo Bills quarterback turned congressman, championed business concerns by introducing corporate tax cuts in 1974. He hired economist Paul Craig Roberts, who brought in Norman Ture to craft the "Job Creation Act," claiming it would generate enough growth to offset revenue losses. Jude Wanniski joined their circle in 1976, and Herbert Stein dubbed them "supply-side fiscalists." Supply-side economics gained political momentum in 1977 when Congressman John Rousselot proposed replacing Democrats' Keynesian stimulus with a 5% reduction in personal income tax rates. Though Democrats dismissed this as "trickle-down economics," Jack Kemp and Senator William Roth soon introduced more ambitious legislation cutting rates by 10% annually for three years. The Republican National Committee endorsed the plan despite fiscal conservatives' discomfort. Dick Cheney, then running for Congress, cautiously supported it while warning Wanniski, "You guys better know what you're talking about." By 1980, even the Joint Economic Committee under Democratic Senator Lloyd Bentsen unanimously endorsed supply-side thinking as "a new era of economic thinking" that could reduce inflation without increasing unemployment. The Reagan tax cuts failed to deliver on supply-side promises. While everyone expected handing out money would boost growth, the specific supply-side claim was that lower rates would encourage more work and investment. Yet Americans didn't increase savings rates as predicted, and despite corporate tax rates falling to negative levels for machinery investments, business investment actually declined. U.S. Steel used its tax windfall to buy Marathon Oil rather than upgrade aging steel mills. The impact on demand proved modest too. The 1980s saw average annual growth of just 2.2 percent after adjusting for population and inflation - slightly slower than the 1970s. Even Dick Cheney later admitted, "I'm not convinced that the Reagan tax cuts worked." With promised growth failing to materialize, the government borrowed on the largest scale since World War II. By late 1981, even Republican stalwarts like Senator Bob Dole were acknowledging problems with supply-side economics. After witnessing a debate between Fed Vice Chairman Frederick Schultz (who viewed Reagan's policies with horror) and Citicorp CEO Walter Wriston (a Reaganomics defender), Dole admitted, "You won the debate. I think we are going to have to do something on the fiscal side." He later joked: "Good news is, a bus full of supply-siders went over a cliff last night. Bad news is, there were three empty seats."

第 6 章

Dismantling Antitrust

In April 1952, AT&T invited engineers from rival companies to learn how to make transistors, even providing factory tours and publishing complete instructions in what became known as "Mother Bell's Cookbook." This technology sharing enabled companies like Texas Instruments to develop silicon transistors and Sony to create transistor radios. AT&T's generosity wasn't voluntary - the federal government forced the company to share its innovations as part of a broader campaign to prevent powerful companies from hoarding technology. Between 1941 and 1959, regulators required over 100 companies to license patents. Later, forcing IBM to allow others to write software for its computers enabled new companies like Microsoft to emerge. This government intervention through antitrust regulation was part of a distinctly American tradition dating back to the 19th century. As railroads and large corporations threatened the ideal of economic independence, the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 criminalized market power abuse. Senator John Sherman argued Americans should not "endure a king over the production, transportation and sale of any of the necessaries of life." The rise of economics transformed antitrust law in America. Economists gradually persuaded the judiciary to abandon the original goals of antitrust in favor of a single objective: providing goods at the lowest possible prices. Aaron Director, though publishing almost nothing, profoundly influenced a generation of Chicago-trained lawyers by challenging conventional antitrust thinking. His students, including Robert Bork, became "Janissaries" spreading his doctrine that corporate behavior typically reflected efficiency rather than predation. Director's followers challenged traditional antitrust enforcement throughout the 1960s. When the Supreme Court protected Utah Pie Company from larger competitors who slashed prices, Robert Bork complained they "were convicted not of injuring competition but, quite simply, of competing." Robert Bork's influential 1978 book "The Antitrust Paradox" provided intellectual cover by rewriting history, falsely claiming the Sherman Act's original purpose was solely to maximize consumer welfare rather than to prevent concentration of power or protect small businesses - a claim contradicted by the Congressional Record. The Reagan administration dramatically shifted antitrust enforcement in 1981 when Attorney General William French Smith declared the government would stop interfering with corporate concentration. The Justice Department issued new guidelines in 1982 embracing the Chicago School's tolerant view of mergers, while halving the antitrust division's staff and enrolling remaining attorneys in mandatory economics classes. The meatpacking industry quickly consolidated after the government defended Cargill's acquisition of three plants. By 1992, the top firms controlled 71% of the market, up from 25%, resulting in a 35% decline in workers' wages as companies shuttered unionized plants. Despite evidence that collusion was common, the government didn't reconsider its tolerance for consolidation. The courts continued narrowing antitrust law, as in the 1993 case where Brown & Williamson (represented by Bork) defeated Liggett's predatory pricing claim. Even Microsoft escaped breakup despite losing its tying case. Corporate concentration has tilted power between employers and workers, allowing companies to demand more while paying less. Workers have fewer alternatives and less leverage, as illustrated when Steve Jobs got a Google recruiter fired for approaching an Apple engineer. Innovation suffers as tech giants like Amazon, Facebook, and Google swallow potential rivals rather than compete with them.

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

轻松跟读，《经济学家的时代》中的每个词都会随音频实时高亮。

第 7 章

The Deregulation Wave

In the mid-1930s, airline industry representative Colonel Edgar Gorrell convinced Congress that competition was threatening the industry's survival, describing it as "economic anarchy." Congress responded in 1938 by creating the Civil Aeronautics Authority, which licensed sixteen airlines and blocked new entrants for four decades, declaring Americans were now "safeguarded against uneconomic, destructive competition." Michael Levine, an aviation enthusiast and Yale Law student in the early 1960s, discovered Pacific Southwest Airlines (PSA), California's unregulated discount airline. Founded in 1949, PSA operated entirely within California, outside federal regulation, selling tickets from a renovated airport latrine and charging less than half the rates of federally licensed carriers. After researching PSA, Levine published a 1965 Yale Law Journal article concluding that U.S. air transportation regulation was "predicated upon erroneous economic assumptions" resulting in "unnecessarily high fares." Though briefly hired by the Civil Aeronautics Board chairman who wanted different perspectives, Levine quit within a year, finding little interest in his ideas. By the mid-1970s, both the political left and right were questioning economic regulation. Ralph Nader, icon of the consumer movement, began campaigning against economic regulation that protected companies at consumers' expense. Senator Ted Kennedy seized the moment, recruiting Harvard Law professor Stephen Breyer to investigate airline regulation. Kennedy's hearings in 1975 highlighted the dramatic price differences between regulated interstate flights and unregulated intrastate service - a ticket from San Francisco to Los Angeles on PSA cost $18.75 while a similar-distance Boston-Washington flight on American Airlines cost $41.67. Jimmy Carter built his political career as a different kind of Democrat, emphasizing Americans as consumers rather than workers. In February 1977, Carter launched a push to deregulate commercial aviation, citing a government report that estimated regulation inflated ticket costs by $1.8 billion annually. To lead the effort, Carter appointed economist Alfred E. Kahn to head the Civil Aeronautics Board. Kahn was an eccentric but brilliant choice - an effervescent professor who walked around his office in socks, lectured staff during daily swims, and maintained wry distance from politicians (keeping a sign reading "I Have Tenure at Cornell" in his office). At the CAB, Kahn transformed the agency from one focused on preventing discounted tickets to one embracing competition. He created an Office of Economic Analysis led by economist Darius Gaskins, hired Michael Levine to fight legal obstacles, and famously demanded plain English in all communications. Carter successfully pushed airline deregulation legislation, signing it on October 24, 1978. The CAB issued 3,189 new route licenses over the next five months before closing permanently in 1984. Carter then tackled the trucking industry, replacing reluctant regulators with economists like Darius Gaskins. Despite Teamster opposition (including an attempted bribe to a senator), Congress passed trucking deregulation in 1980, followed by railroad deregulation. Transportation deregulation delivered economists' predicted benefits: logistics costs fell from 18% to 7.4% of GDP, and airline prices dropped 45% while passenger volume soared. However, it also transferred money from workers to consumers and executives - truck driver earnings fell 20% while airline CEO compensation skyrocketed from $373,779 to $11.33 million.

第 8 章

The Value of Life

The U.S. military historically spent without restraint, claiming it was keeping pace with the Soviets while Congress lacked the will to control spending. When John F. Kennedy became president in 1960, he appointed Robert McNamara as Defense Secretary to overhaul this approach. McNamara hired economist Charles Hitch from the RAND Corporation, who had just published "The Economics of Defense in the Nuclear Age." Hitch introduced cost-benefit analysis to the military, requiring each branch to articulate their goals, options for achieving them, and the costs and benefits of each option. This wasn't replacing an earlier decision-making system - it was introducing the very discipline of making choices. When military officials resisted economic judgment of their decisions, Hitch's 30-year-old aide Alain Enthoven famously retorted, "General, I have fought just as many nuclear wars as you have." In 1965, economist Charles Schultze, the new White House budget director, proposed extending this approach across government. Johnson's domestic adviser Joseph Califano, frustrated with "unsystematic and chaotic and anarchic" budgeting, strongly endorsed the idea. Within two weeks, President Johnson ordered the implementation of cost-benefit analysis throughout the executive branch to bring "a finer life" to Americans "at the lowest possible cost." As cost-benefit analysis expanded, economists developed increasingly sophisticated methods for pricing the previously unquantifiable. The National Park Service, initially resistant to monetizing recreation, eventually adopted Harold Hotelling's approach of calculating how much visitors spent to access parks. The Nixon administration first formally valued human life in regulatory analysis in 1971, shocking government officials. Using insurance industry logic, they calculated a human life at $140,000 (about $885,000 in 2019). By 1974, this valuation led to rejecting "Mansfield bars" on trucks that would have saved lives but cost too much per life saved. Thomas Schelling revolutionized this approach in 1965 by arguing that the value of life should be determined by "the people who may die" rather than by their economic output to others. Younger economists built on this by analyzing wage premiums for dangerous jobs to infer how workers valued their own safety. By 1978, the Consumer Product Safety Commission was using a $1 million per life figure in regulatory analyses. W. Kip Viscusi sought to persuade liberals to embrace cost-benefit analysis rather than reject it outright. His doctoral dissertation in 1976 was among the early papers using wage data to estimate the value of human life. Though initially rebuffed in the Carter administration by an official who called such valuation "immoral," Viscusi's work gained traction in the 1980s. When OSHA needed to justify warning labels on workplace chemicals, Viscusi's valuation of human life at $2-3 million (versus the agency's few hundred thousand) helped demonstrate the rule's benefits exceeded its costs. Despite liberal hopes that Clinton would abandon cost-benefit analysis, his administration maintained regulatory review, with regulatory czar Sally Katzen arguing regulation was good and cost-benefit analysis made it better. Even Vice President Gore declared himself a convert.

从《经济学家的时代》中收获更多

每日获取新洞见，探索 10 万+ 条课程内容
文字实时高亮，与音频同步
保存你的书库，在所有设备上随时访问

第 9 章

The Legacy of the Economists' Hour

Since the early 1970s, economic growth has become erratic, with benefits flowing primarily to the wealthy. The top 10% of households increased their share of total income from 31% in 1971 to 48% by 2016, returning inequality to Gatsby-era levels. America's transformation from manufacturing to services was largely inevitable due to technological progress and globalization. But the policies of the Economists' Hour made this transition unnecessarily painful by accelerating economic evolution while concentrating benefits among the wealthy. The high dollar and focus on low inflation hastened manufacturing's decline, while weakened unions and increased corporate concentration shifted bargaining power to employers. The minimum wage, which peaked in value in 1968, lost 40% of its purchasing power during the Economists' Hour. Even liberal economists like Samuelson and Tobin viewed unions as cartels and minimum wages as job-killers, making it easier for politicians to attack worker protections. The result: workers' share of economic output has been falling since the early 1970s. For the bottom 99% of households, income growth in France actually outpaced the United States during the Economists' Hour, challenging perceptions of American economic superiority. The problem isn't markets themselves, but their imbalanced implementation without adequate safety nets. Countries with stronger social protections experience less backlash against globalization. Markets need not prioritize efficiency above all else. The government already protects affluent Americans through professional cartels like medical associations and real estate agents' commissions, while zoning laws benefit current homeowners. These protections should extend to the less fortunate by acknowledging that losing a dollar hurts more than gaining one pleases, and by slowing the pace of change to reduce pain. Research consistently shows people value fairness over pure economic gain. Sometimes the right answer is to do without markets entirely, as when they undermine democratic access. America has allowed markets to determine access to healthcare, education, and even citizenship, unlike other developed nations. Friedman claimed markets reduce social strain by limiting issues requiring agreement, but relationships strengthen through use, not avoidance. When wealthy people can simply exit failing systems rather than improving them, social bonds weaken. America's problem is "too many markets, and too much walking away." Markets remain powerful wealth creators, but "the measure of a society is the quality of life at the bottom of the pyramid, not the top." Liberal democracy depends on reducing the strain of inequality.

★★★★★

你已读完《经济学家的时代》

“坚持使用 23 天了，我每天都会打开它。它现在已经成为我的日常习惯。”

jayallen

《经济学家的时代》摘要中的核心主题

market fundamentalism
neoliberal policy shift
economic technocracy
deregulation history
consequences of globalization

《经济学家的时代》摘要精选金句

Open markets represented the best system of human governance.
Increased taxes generate far more public discussion than increased draft calls.
Ending the draft would make war 'the business of the poor.'
Modern economics could perpetuate endless growth.
I don't think we have any substitute for seeking an answer to our problems in the context of monetary discipline.

《经济学家的时代》摘要中的人物

Paul VolckerEconomist at the Federal Reserve Bank
Walter W. HellerChairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
Paul SamuelsonKeynesian economist and influential author

关于作者

Binyamin Appelbaum 是《经济学家的时刻：伪先知、自由市场与社会的分裂》（The Economists’ Hour: False Prophets, Free Markets, and the Fracture of Society）一书的作者，他是一位曾入围普利策奖的记者，也是经济政策领域的领军人物。作为《纽约时报》编辑委员会负责商业和经济的主笔，Appelbaum 将数十年的严谨调查与历史学家的视角相结合，分析了经济学家如何重塑全球治理。

他此前在《夏洛特观察报》（The Charlotte Observer）对 2008 年次级抵押贷款危机的报道揭露了掠夺性贷款行为并引发了联邦调查，该报道为他赢得了乔治·波克奖（George Polk Award），并确立了他揭露系统性金融风险的声誉。

Appelbaum 的工作架起了经济理论与现实世界影响之间的桥梁，这得益于他此前在《华盛顿邮报》、《波士顿环球报》和《夏洛特观察报》的任职经历。《经济学家的时刻》因其对自由市场意识形态带来的社会后果的批判而广受赞誉，进一步扩展了他获奖新闻报道中的主题。

该书在有关不平等和全球化的辩论中被广泛引用，体现了 Appelbaum 将复杂的政策辩论转化为通俗易懂叙事的能力。他现居华盛顿特区，通过其全球数百万读者阅读的社论持续影响着经济话语。

下载《经济学家的时代》摘要

免费获取《经济学家的时代》摘要的 PDF 或 EPUB 版本。可打印或随时离线阅读。

用户还喜欢

Good Economics for Hard Times

Abhijit V. Banerjee & Esther Duflo

Austerity

Mark Blyth

The only game in town

Mohamed A. El-Erian

Keynes Hayek

Nicholas Wapshott

Angrynomics

Eric Lonergan and Mark Blyth

How Economics Explains the World

Andrew Leigh

New Ideas from Dead Economists

Todd G. Buchholz

False Economy

Alan Beattie

关于《经济学家的时代》摘要的常见问题

发现更多

学习计划

Economics for Future Leaders

This plan provides a foundational toolkit for aspiring decision-makers to understand the invisible forces shaping our world. It is ideal for students and professionals who want to bridge the gap between abstract economic theory and practical financial literacy.

1 h 45 m•3 章节

学习计划

The Social Logic of Wealth

This plan bridges the gap between sociology and economics to reveal how human relationships drive financial outcomes. It is essential for professionals, policymakers, and students who want to understand the hidden social structures that govern wealth and market success.

2 h•4 章节

学习计划

Study economics

Economics shapes every aspect of modern life, from personal financial decisions to global policy debates. This comprehensive learning plan is ideal for students, professionals, entrepreneurs, and engaged citizens who want to understand the forces driving markets, make better strategic decisions, and critically evaluate economic claims in business and public discourse.

4 h 22 m•4 章节

学习计划

Power, Ideas, and the State

In an era of deep polarization, understanding the intersection of economic interests and political theory is essential for informed citizenship. This plan is designed for aspiring leaders and policy enthusiasts who want to move beyond headlines to the structural roots of governance.

1 h 30 m•3 章节

学习计划

Power, Money, and Daily Life

This learning plan is essential for anyone seeking to understand the invisible forces of governance and economics that shape our world. It is designed for curious minds and aspiring policy thinkers who want to move beyond headlines to grasp how power and capital actually function.

2 h•4 章节

学习计划

Master behavioral economics

Behavioral economics has revolutionized how we understand human decision-making, revealing that people consistently make predictable errors in judgment that traditional economics cannot explain. This learning plan is essential for professionals in business, policy, marketing, product design, and leadership roles who want to understand what truly drives human behavior and how to design systems that lead to better outcomes. Whether you're optimizing user experiences, crafting policies, developing marketing strategies, or simply seeking to make better decisions yourself, mastering these principles provides a powerful competitive advantage.

4 h 39 m•4 章节

学习计划

Capital, Culture, and the Global Pivot

This plan offers a unique historical lens on how specific cultural identities and state-building efforts shaped today's global economy. It is ideal for finance professionals, historians, or policy analysts seeking to understand the deep-rooted origins of modern markets and the rise of economic miracles.

2 h•4 章节

学习计划

The Management Shadow: Taleb/Kahneman/Greene

In an era of radical uncertainty, traditional management frameworks often fail because they ignore human irrationality and the impact of rare events. This plan is designed for leaders and strategists who want to master the hidden psychological and systemic forces that govern success and power.

4 h 43 m•4 章节

由哥伦比亚大学校友创建源自旧金山

BeFreed 汇聚全球求知若渴的学习者

4.7

平均评分

7,840+ 条 App 评分

BeFreed Community

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

查看更多网络上关于 BeFreed 的讨论

由哥伦比亚大学校友创建源自旧金山

BeFreed 汇聚全球求知若渴的学习者

4.7

平均评分

7,840+ 条 App 评分

BeFreed Community

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

查看更多网络上关于 BeFreed 的讨论

开启你的学习之旅，就是现在

第 6 章

《经济学家的时代》摘要

《经济学家的时代》摘要概述

用不同学习方式探索《经济学家的时代》摘要

When Markets Ruled the World

The Rise of Market Fundamentalism

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

The Battle Against Inflation

The Volcker Revolution

从 《经济学家的时代》中收获更多

The Tax Revolution

Dismantling Antitrust

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

The Deregulation Wave

The Value of Life

从 《经济学家的时代》中收获更多

The Legacy of the Economists' Hour

你已读完 《经济学家的时代》

《经济学家的时代》摘要中的核心主题

《经济学家的时代》摘要精选金句

《经济学家的时代》摘要中的人物

关于作者

下载《经济学家的时代》摘要

用户还喜欢

关于《经济学家的时代》摘要的常见问题

What is The Economists' Hour by Binyamin Appelbaum about?

Who should read The Economists' Hour?

Is The Economists' Hour worth reading?

What are the main arguments in The Economists' Hour?

发现更多

BeFreed 汇聚全球求知若渴的学习者

BeFreed 汇聚全球求知若渴的学习者

用不同学习方式探索《经济学家的时代》摘要

When Markets Ruled the World

The Rise of Market Fundamentalism

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

The Battle Against Inflation

The Volcker Revolution

从 《经济学家的时代》中收获更多

The Tax Revolution

Dismantling Antitrust

边听边看，每个词都清晰呈现

The Deregulation Wave

The Value of Life

从 《经济学家的时代》中收获更多

The Legacy of the Economists' Hour

你已读完 《经济学家的时代》

用户还喜欢

发现更多

从《经济学家的时代》中收获更多

从《经济学家的时代》中收获更多

你已读完《经济学家的时代》

从《经济学家的时代》中收获更多

从《经济学家的时代》中收获更多

你已读完《经济学家的时代》