What is *Un-Trumping America* by Dan Pfeiffer about?

*Un-Trumping America* by Dan Pfeiffer is a political playbook arguing that Donald Trump represents the natural evolution of the modern Republican Party, not an anomaly. The book outlines strategies to defeat Trump in 2020 and proposes systemic democratic reforms to prevent similar figures from rising again. Pfeiffer, a former Obama advisor, blends insider insights with actionable plans to address polarization, disinformation, and voter suppression.

Who should read *Un-Trumping America*?

This book is ideal for politically engaged readers seeking to understand the GOP’s alignment with Trumpian politics and Democrats’ path to electoral success. It appeals to progressive activists, policymakers, and those interested in media’s role in democracy. Pfeiffer’s blend of campaign anecdotes and policy proposals makes it valuable for both casual and wonkish audiences.

Is *Un-Trumping America* worth reading?

Yes, for its incisive analysis of Republican tactics and clear roadmap for Democratic strategy. Pfeiffer’s experience as Obama’s communications director lends credibility, while his focus on long-term democratic reforms (e.g., ending gerrymandering, expanding voting access) offers substance beyond typical campaign narratives. Critics praise its urgency, though some find its partisan tone polarizing.

What are Dan Pfeiffer’s main arguments in *Un-Trumping America*?

Pfeiffer asserts three key points: - Trump is the GOP’s logical conclusion, not an outlier. - Democrats must prioritize grassroots mobilization, counter disinformation, and court diverse coalitions to win. - Systemic reforms like abolishing the Electoral College and banning gerrymandering are essential to safeguarding democracy.

How does Pfeiffer suggest defeating Trump and the GOP?

He advocates for Democrats to embrace bold policies (e.g., climate action, healthcare expansion), leverage digital organizing, and expose Republican reliance on voter suppression. Pfeiffer emphasizes combating right-wing media narratives through proactive messaging and building a progressive media ecosystem.

What democratic reforms does *Un-Trumping America* propose?

The book calls for abolishing the Electoral College, enacting national vote-by-mail, ending partisan gerrymandering, and expanding the Supreme Court. Pfeiffer argues these steps would reduce polarization and ensure equitable representation.

How does Pfeiffer critique the Republican Party in the book?

He portrays the GOP as a party that deliberately undermines democracy through gerrymandering, judicial manipulation, and alignment with far-right media. Pfeiffer traces this shift to the post-Obama era, where anti-establishment rhetoric and racial resentment became central to Republican strategy.

What role does media play in *Un-Trumping America*’s analysis?

Pfeiffer blames right-wing media (e.g., Fox News, Facebook algorithms) for amplifying disinformation and normalizing extremist ideologies. He urges progressives to counter by funding independent journalism and creating engaging digital content to reach disaffected voters.

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기

미국을 다시 민주주의 국가로 만들기 위한 계획

댄 파이퍼

4.2(2680 Reviews)

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기 개요

오바마의 고문 댄 파이퍼(Dan Pfeiffer)의 전략서는 트럼피즘을 해체하고 실행 가능한 전략을 통해 민주주의를 재건합니다. "Pod Save America" 진행자들이 지지하는 이 CNN 분석가의 가이드는 민주당원들이 간절히 원하는 것, 즉 분노를 넘어 미국의 민주적 기관들을 되찾기 위한 실질적인 로드맵을 제시합니다.

전달 방식을 선택하세요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기의 같은 아이디어를 담았습니다. 나에게 맞는 목소리, 깊이, 속도를 고르고 언제든 바꿔 보세요.

1장

The Battle for America's Political Soul

In the summer of 2016, Dan Pfeiffer found himself in Cleveland at the Republican National Convention, surrounded by the awkward tension of what felt like a bad wedding. Amidst the chaos, he had a revealing conversation with a Never Trump Republican. When Pfeiffer suggested this Republican must be eager to be rid of "these Trump people" after Trump's inevitable defeat, the response was chilling: "These people aren't going anywhere. Win or lose, they're here to stay. This is the Republican Party now." This moment crystallized what would become the central thesis of "Un-Trumping America" - that Trump himself isn't the disease but merely the most visible symptom of a deeper political malady. The book, which shot to #3 on the New York Times bestseller list upon its 2020 release, has been praised by figures ranging from Hillary Clinton to Jon Stewart for its unflinching analysis of American democracy in crisis. As a former Obama White House Communications Director, Pfeiffer brings insider knowledge and strategic thinking to what has become one of the most pressing questions in American politics: How do we move beyond Trump and the forces that enabled his rise?

2장

Trumpism: The Marriage of Billionaires and Bigots

Trumpism isn't a coherent political philosophy - Trump himself has no underlying beliefs beyond racism and narcissism. At its core, Trumpism represents "billionaire-funded racial grievance politics" - plutocracy disguised as populism. It's more a political playbook than an ideology, featuring racial division to mobilize the base, normalized lying, treating press as the enemy, viewing democracy as an obstacle, using propaganda as primary communication, and winning at all costs regardless of morals, laws, or consequences. While these tactics existed before Trump, they were never deployed so explicitly or successfully. His victory supercharged the Republican Party's worst instincts and created a playbook that will outlive his presidency. Trump's win resolved a fundamental tension within the Republican Party. For years, establishment Republicans (raised on Reagan and Bush) battled with Tea Party upstarts (raised on Rush Limbaugh and Breitbart) who emerged in opposition to Obama. While establishment Republicans were annoyed America elected a liberal president, the Tea Partyers were apoplectic America elected a black president. These Tea Partyers - later rebranded as the Freedom Caucus - repeatedly pushed the party into losing confrontations. The most dangerous example was when newly elected Republicans forced a confrontation over the debt ceiling, essentially threatening America's ability to pay its bills. I sat in the Situation Room during terrorist threats and potential pandemics, but I was never more afraid than during this debt-ceiling showdown - it was legislative terrorism that caused market plunges and a credit rating downgrade. This revealed the fundamental tension in the Republican Party: corporate-serving establishment versus a rabid base fueled by racial paranoia. Obama's election made the Republican base whiter, more rural, and increasingly anti-trade, anti-immigrant, and anti-Wall Street. But that reckoning never happened because America elected a racist billionaire. Trump showed Republicans they could have their racism and their tax cuts too. He united the billionaires and the bigots - the core of Trumpism is billionaire-funded racial grievance politics. This union will continue after Trump because they need each other to maintain political power.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

3장

Yes We Can vs. Because We Can: The Political Power Asymmetry

Democrats and Republicans in Washington are playing two different games with different sets of rules. The great asymmetry in American politics is that Democrats view political power as a means to an end, while Republicans view political power as an end in itself. In other words, Democrats want to do the right thing and Republicans want to win. Modern politics is a contest between two philosophies: "Yes We Can" versus "Because We Can." There's an amoral nihilism to an approach that strives for political power for power's sake, and no one embodies this more than Mitch McConnell. While we've focused on Trump as the existential threat to American democracy, McConnell is the true threat who created the environment where someone like Trump could thrive. McConnell's terribleness was on full display when the Obama administration uncovered Russian interference in the 2016 election. The administration proposed a bipartisan letter from congressional leadership detailing what they knew. McConnell refused to sign - not because he questioned the intelligence, but because he thought it would hurt Trump and Republicans in key Senate races. McConnell would rather lose his appendix with a dull spoon than give up an ounce of political power. McConnell's pattern of putting party above country is clear: he refused to work with Obama on economic recovery during the financial crisis, openly stated his top priority was making Obama a one-term president, and stole a Supreme Court seat by refusing to fill Scalia's vacancy. When later asked if he would fill a vacancy in 2020, he didn't hesitate to say "Absolutely," exposing his naked cynicism. Obama's "Yes We Can" optimism powered his rise to the White House, reflecting his sincere belief in the possibility of better politics and faith in the American people. His campaign represented a rejection of the cautious centrism that had frustrated Democrats - the Clintonian triangulation, obsessive poll-testing, small-bore policy initiatives, and support for the Iraq War. Obama wasn't a "usual" politician. As a newcomer to national politics without the battle scars of endless political wars, he embraced politically risky positions like the Affordable Care Act. This approach made me proud to be a Democrat and prouder to have worked for Obama. The times we live in call for bold action, not incrementalism or mushy-middle centrism. Despite Democratic policies being more popular, Trump's historically low poll numbers, and Democrats outnumbering Republicans nationally, Republicans have been winning the long war for power in American politics. The Republican Party has abandoned conservative principles in favor of pursuing consistent power. This shift gives them a tactical advantage - they can choose whatever path is most politically beneficial at any moment, unburdened by principles, prior positions, or morality. Republican politicians have trained their voters to root for the jersey regardless of what happens on the field. Democrats don't have this freedom. We're governed by ideological commitments to which our voters hold us accountable. Obama felt obligated to pass healthcare reform because he campaigned on it, even knowing it would hurt his political prospects. Republican voters, by contrast, care primarily about winning. This ideological flexibility allows Republicans to hold together a coalition of struggling white men and billionaires profiting from that struggle. Their positions shift constantly: small government under Bush for prescription drugs, then against it for Obamacare; deficits don't matter under Bush and Trump, but are catastrophic under Obama; for immigration reform under Bush, against it under Obama, briefly for it after 2012, then hard-line under Trump.

4장

The Republican Playbook: Racism, Rigging, and Racketeering

Far from representing a break with Republican tradition, Trump's racism fits perfectly within the party's fifty-year trajectory. From Nixon's "Southern strategy" to Reagan's "states' rights" speech near a civil rights murder site, from Bush Sr.'s Willie Horton ad to Bush Jr.'s anti-LGBTQ campaign, Republicans have consistently exploited racial divisions. When Obama was elected, Republicans pushed racist conspiracy theories about voter fraud in inner cities, ACORN, and the New Black Panthers. Even Mitt Romney, the great hope of the #NeverTrump movement, ran as an anti-immigrant crusader in 2012. The pre-Trump Republican Party attempted subtlety with racism through "dog whistles" - racist pitches only racists could hear. Jesse Helms' infamous 1990 ad against Harvey Gantt exemplifies this, showing a white man's rejection letter because "they had to give it to a minority." Republican success depended on scaring white voters about nonwhite people taking jobs and committing crimes, while maintaining plausible deniability. Trump abandoned subtlety for a bullhorn, explicitly calling Mexican immigrants "rapists" and proposing Muslim bans. Bill Clinton's 1992 criticism of rapper Sister Souljah became a political template for candidates to prove mainstream appeal by condemning extremists in their party. Yet when Trump launched his racist birther crusade against Obama in 2011, Republicans missed this perfect "Sister Souljah moment." Instead of condemning Trump's conspiracy theories, Republican leaders remained silent. Within months of Trump's public humiliation at the White House Correspondents' dinner, Republican presidential candidates were making pilgrimages to Trump Tower seeking his endorsement. Mitt Romney eventually won Trump's backing, sending the unmistakable message that extreme racist views were welcome in the Republican Party. Trump didn't make Republicans comfortable with racism; their comfort with racism made them comfortable with Trump. After Obama's 2012 reelection, Republicans faced two options: broaden appeal to nonwhite voters, or double down on white voters. Despite initial signals toward inclusion, they ultimately chose the latter path. Trump's 2016 victory settled the debate: the GOP would become a white nationalist party. Senator John Cornyn's 2019 tweet highlighting that "Texas gained almost nine Hispanic residents for every additional white resident" exemplifies this strategy - an explicit message that white Americans should fear demographic change.

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

5장

The Republican Plot Against Democracy

While Americans have been distracted by Trump's tweets and White House drama, Republicans have been systematically rigging American democracy by diluting the power of the majority and installing minority rule. Understanding this plan is the first step to fixing our democracy. After Obama's shocking 2008 victory, Republicans implemented voter ID laws to restrict Democratic voting access. Republican officials have openly admitted these laws' partisan purpose - Wisconsin congressman Glenn Grothman argued voter ID would "make a little bit of a difference" helping Republicans win Wisconsin, while Pennsylvania's Republican leader listed voter ID among accomplishments that would "allow Governor Romney to win the state." These Jim Crow-style policies are costing Democrats elections - a study found Wisconsin's voter ID law potentially suppressed 200,000 votes in a state Trump won by just 22,700 votes. Despite Democrats winning the popular vote by eight points in 2018, they gained only 40 House seats compared to Republicans' 63 seats in 2010 when they won by seven points. This disparity stems from Republican gerrymandering after the 2010 census, when they outspent Democrats three-to-one in state legislative races to gain redistricting power. In Wisconsin, Democrats won every statewide election in 2018 yet Republicans still captured 63 of 99 assembly seats. In North Carolina, Republicans deliberately split historically black universities between districts. When Democrats challenged these maps, the conservative Supreme Court abandoned the "one person, one vote" standard in 2019, ruling gerrymandering was for voters to decide - voters who can't vote out gerrymandering politicians because of gerrymandering. In January 2010, the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling devastated campaign finance regulations. The decision unleashed unprecedented corporate spending in elections - outside spending jumped from $70 million before Citizens United to over $300 million in 2010, helping Republicans deliver Democrats a "historic ass whipping." By 2012, Republican-affiliated groups outspent Democratic counterparts $418 million to $130 million. The Koch brothers now effectively own the Republican Party, with candidates terrified of losing their financial backing if they acknowledge climate change. The system overwhelmingly benefits Republicans since it takes "a hundred thousand Democrats donating $10 to match one Republican writing one $1 million check." Republican obstruction of Obama's judicial appointments was systematic and unprecedented. They filibustered even non-controversial nominees, requiring 60 votes and extending confirmation times. They abused the "blue slip" procedure, which gives senators informal veto power over nominees from their states. When Democrats eliminated the filibuster for judicial appointments in 2013, Obama briefly managed to confirm judges, including key appointments to the DC Circuit. But after Republicans won the Senate in 2014, McConnell ground the process to a halt, leaving Obama with more than one hundred vacancies at the end of his term, including a Supreme Court seat that would have shifted the court in a liberal direction.

6장

Winning in 2020: A Strategic Blueprint

Campaigns against Trump will be extraordinarily difficult - incumbents rarely lose, Trump has a financial head start, Republican billionaires will protect their tax cuts, and Republicans will employ voter suppression, intimidation, and possibly foreign interference. Campaigns must focus on what they can control while preparing for unpredictable events. Above all, cybersecurity ("Don't get hacked") is crucial, and Democrats must revolutionize campaign strategy rather than rely on outdated methods like TV ads, phone calls, and mail that young voters ignore. Traditional campaign structures are outdated, with TV ads, phone calls, and mail still dominating despite their ineffectiveness with younger voters. This persists due to risk aversion and perverse financial incentives for consultants who profit from ad buys. Trump inadvertently innovated in 2016 because he couldn't attract traditional operatives or funding. To win in 2020, Democrats must revolutionize campaigning by questioning every assumption, breaking traditions, and listening to younger staffers with fresh perspectives. Campaigns must be digital-first across all functions, use polling only to track progress (not determine positions), build bottom-up structures that empower grassroots organizers, and create alternative media ecosystems rather than relying on mainstream coverage. Traditional campaign strategy targets opponents' secret weaknesses - like McCain's support for Bush policies or Romney's plutocratic image. But Trump is different. His flaws are already obvious, and voter expectations for him are so low that nothing seems shocking. Even the Access Hollywood tape revealing sexual assault bragging didn't end his candidacy as it would have for any other politician. Instead of attacking Trump's obvious weaknesses, target his strengths. On immigration, call out his failures after three years in charge, expose how he profits from undocumented labor at his businesses, and reject his fearmongering framework entirely. On trade, highlight his hypocrisy with Trump-branded products made in China and his incompetent trade war that hurt American farmers while big corporations received the bailout money borrowed from China. Democrats have wasted time debating whether to appeal to the base or court moderate swing voters - a false choice as long as the Electoral College exists. The only path to 270 electoral votes requires doing both, as Obama demonstrated twice without compromising his principles. The media portrays base voters and swing voters as having irreconcilable differences, but they actually share many concerns: an economy rigged for the wealthy, healthcare as a right, and Trump's corruption. A unifying message can work in both Philadelphia and Scranton - you just need to show up in both places and speak to Americans' shared concerns. Conventional wisdom says making elections a referendum on incumbents is the best strategy, but both Romney in 2012 and Clinton in 2016 failed with this approach. This election will inevitably be a choice between you and Trump, so you must make the case for yourself, not just against him. Trump's deficiencies are already priced in - his supporters voted with eyes open to his flaws. Some appreciated his racism, others were partisan Republicans, and many were frustrated with politics-as-usual. Your job is showing why their gamble didn't pay off and why you deserve their vote. Remember that the decisive voters often pay the least attention to politics, so introduce yourself thoroughly.

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기의 각 단어가 오디오에 맞춰 실시간으로 강조되어 편하게 따라 읽을 수 있습니다.

7장

Rebuilding Democracy: The Path Forward

Barack Obama revolutionized campaign fundraising with unprecedented grassroots small-dollar donations. In 2008, he raised so much money that he became the first major candidate to forgo federal matching funds. Yet by 2012, in the post-Citizens United landscape, Obama became the first incumbent in recent memory to be outspent by the opposition. The situation has grown exponentially worse under Trump, who raised $30 million in a single weekend in summer 2019 - more than many Democratic presidential candidates raised in all of 2019, and he accomplished this in mere hours. Our democracy is for sale, and Democrats can't win playing the Republican game. Republicans have always had a fundamental money advantage because more wealthy people and corporations back them. Before Citizens United, campaign finance caps limited individual influence, allowing Democrats to compete despite this disadvantage. Now, with unlimited contributions to super PACs and nonprofits, money equals political power. The system operates in gray areas - candidates pitch to donors, leave the room, and super PAC representatives collect massive checks from the same people. The Koch brothers exemplify this system, using their $50 billion fortunes to control Republican politics at every level and protect their fossil fuel interests. After spending millions advocating for Trump's tax cut (which saved them an estimated $1 billion), they donated $500,000 to Paul Ryan's PAC - a perfect illustration of their investment approach to politics. The Federal Election Commission is deliberately ineffective by design. Created after Watergate, the FEC has limited authority and six commissioners, ensuring deadlocks on important decisions. In 2020, a Republican commissioner resigned, leaving the FEC without enough members to even meet, then promptly joined a law firm specializing in helping Republicans exploit campaign finance loopholes. Democrats must prioritize reforming the FEC with more commissioners, resources and enforcement power to address rampant political cheating. Dark money groups have spent over $1 billion on American elections since Citizens United, all in secret. Unlike campaigns and super PACs that must disclose donors, political nonprofits can spend millions without transparency. The DISCLOSE Act, which would close this loophole, passed the Democratic House but was blocked by Mitch McConnell. A Democratic president could force federal contractors to disclose political spending through executive order - something Obama considered but abandoned. Ultimately, exposing the financial connections between corporations and Republican demagoguery could cut off Trumpism's supply lines. Democrats must reject corporate and lobbyist money not just as a moral stance but as a winning political strategy. Obama's 2008 campaign proved this approach works - refusing lobbyist and PAC money became central to his message of change and helped raise half a billion dollars in small donations. When the DNC eventually reversed this policy in 2016, it damaged the party's credibility. Bernie Sanders and Beto O'Rourke demonstrated that taking principled stands on campaign funding unlocks grassroots donor enthusiasm.

8장

Reforming American Institutions

America's democracy has always been imperfect, but the system is fundamentally broken. The Electoral College is a prime example - in 2000, Gore needed to win all swing states to reach 270 electoral votes, an "inside straight" he nearly achieved, losing only Florida. Obama's victories in 2008 and 2012 suggested demographic changes might give Democrats a permanent Electoral College advantage, but Trump's 2016 victory - despite losing the popular vote by three million - shattered that theory. Trump himself called the Electoral College "phoney" in 2012 tweets when he mistakenly thought Obama had lost the popular vote, writing "More votes equals a loss...revolution!" Defenders of the Electoral College make two main arguments: that the founders specifically designed it (though they also limited voting to white male landowners), and that without it candidates would only campaign in big cities. But the current system actually restricts campaigning to a handful of battleground states, with most states completely ignored. Eliminating the Electoral College would give everyone's vote equal weight regardless of location and incentivize candidates to campaign in previously ignored areas. While a constitutional amendment would be extremely difficult, Democrats should start advocating for it now. Meanwhile, the National Popular Vote interstate compact offers a clever workaround - fifteen states plus DC have already agreed to award their electoral votes to the national popular vote winner regardless of state results. The Senate is fundamentally broken despite its venerated status among insiders. Most senators aren't the giants of yesteryear but former House members who haven't become smarter or more deliberative by changing chambers. The 60-vote requirement paralyzes action on urgent issues like climate change. Worse, demographic trends show young people moving from rural red states to urban blue ones, further concentrating Democratic voters. By 2040, 70% of Americans will live in just sixteen states, meaning the remaining 30% will control sixty-eight Senate seats - dramatically diluting the political power of non-white voters. Despite Democrats' massive 2018 midterm victory, Republicans blocked Obama's nominees after his reelection. Harry Reid, the tough former boxer and Senate majority leader who formed an incredible partnership with Obama, decided enough was enough. In 2013, he persuaded Democrats to change Senate rules so executive branch appointments and non-Supreme Court judges could be confirmed with 50 votes instead of 60. Reid preserved the 60-vote threshold for Supreme Court nominees, but McConnell immediately eliminated that requirement once Trump took office to confirm Neil Gorsuch to the seat stolen from Merrick Garland. The next Democratic Senate majority leader should eliminate the remaining legislative filibuster despite opposition from many Democrats.

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

매일 새로운 인사이트를 10만 개 이상의 레슨에서 만나보세요
단어가 강조되어 오디오와 실시간으로 동기화됩니다
내 라이브러리를 저장하고 모든 기기에서 이용하세요

9장

Toward a More Perfect Union

Through travels across America for Pod Save America, I've found rejuvenation amid the disasters of the Trump era. I meet activists who channeled their anger into action - wannabe optimists seeking hope. I acknowledge the challenge of balancing honesty about our broken system with the hope needed to fuel activism. Drawing from Obama's lesson during his darkest presidential moment - "If I go down, I'm not going down like a punk" - I argue that when everything is at stake, we must run like we have nothing to lose. Despite Washington's caution, I find hope in everyday citizens fighting back: Parkland students, terminal patient Ady Barkan advocating for healthcare, Amanda Litman helping thousands run for office, and Chicago mothers confronting violence. These people embody Obama's audacity and show the path forward. The disorientation of our current moment has Democrats debating how to respond to Trump's assholery and Republican radicalization. Some argue we should adopt McConnell and Trump's strategies - smashing norms and breaking rules that seem to work for Republicans. But this approach fundamentally misunderstands that Democratic and Republican bases respond to different motivations: Democrats need hope while Republicans respond to fear. Trump's strategy works because he can't convince people he's good, but can convince them his opponents are equally bad. Democrats must forge a new approach that fuses Obama's hopeful idealism with the realism that comes from knowing someone like Trump can become president - becoming "idealists without illusions" who match Republicans in strategy and toughness, not cynicism. If we follow the lead of these everyday heroes, we will beat Trump, fix our democracy, and make sure that this era was nothing more than a detour from the path to a more perfect union.

★★★★★

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기 완독을 축하합니다

100만 명 이상의 학습자가 사랑합니다

“23일째 매일 사용하고 있어요. 이제 제 일상의 한 부분이 되었습니다.”

jayallen

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기의 핵심 주제

democratic structural reform
partisan power asymmetry
racial grievance politics
republican party radicalization
legislative brinkmanship

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기의 명언

Trumpism represents billionaire-funded racial grievance politics.
Democrats want to do the right thing and Republicans want to win.
McConnell would rather lose his appendix with a dull spoon than give up an ounce of political power.
The times we live in call for bold action, not incrementalism or mushy-middle centrism.
Republicans have been winning the long war for power in American politics.

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기의 등장인물

Dan PfeifferAuthor and former Obama Communications Director
Donald Trump45th U.S. President and subject of the analysis
Mitch McConnellRepublican leader described as a threat to democracy

저자 소개

댄 파이퍼(Dan Pfeiffer)는 베스트셀러인 Untrumping America의 저자이자 버락 오바마 대통령의 전 선임 고문으로, 정치 전략 및 디지털 커뮤니케이션 분야의 전문가로 명성이 높습니다.

오바마 행정부의 혁신적인 미디어 접근 방식을 설계한 핵심 인물인 파이퍼는 트위터와 유튜브 같은 소셜 플랫폼을 활용해 유권자들의 참여를 이끌어내는 방식을 개척했으며, 오바마 대통령의 화제가 된 "비트윈 투 퍼른스(Between Two Ferns)" 인터뷰를 기획하기도 했습니다. 그의 저서는 2008년과 2012년 대선 캠페인부터 백악관에서의 6년에 걸친 깊은 경험을 바탕으로, 현대 정치에 대한 날카로운 분석과 진보적 옹호를 위한 실질적인 통찰을 결합하고 있습니다.

파이퍼는 3억 회 이상의 다운로드를 기록하고 HBO 특집 방송으로도 제작된 영향력 있는 팟캐스트 Pod Save America의 공동 진행자로 활동하며, 진보 미디어의 선두 주자로서 입지를 굳혔습니다. 그의 전작인 Yes We (Still) Can은 뉴욕 타임스 베스트셀러 1위로 데뷔하며 오바마 시대 정치의 생생한 뒷이야기를 전했습니다.

CNN 정치 평론가이자 '렛 아메리카 보트(Let America Vote)'와 같은 옹호 단체의 이사회 멤버로 활동 중인 파이퍼의 작업은 현대 민주주의에 관한 논의에서 널리 인용되고 있습니다. Untrumping America는 재치와 내부자의 시각, 그리고 실행 가능한 전략을 결합하는 그의 전통을 이어가며, 오늘날의 양극화된 지형을 헤쳐 나가는 독자들에게 깊은 공감을 얻고 있습니다.

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기 요약 다운로드

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기 요약을 무료 PDF 또는 EPUB으로 받으세요. 인쇄하거나 오프라인에서 언제든 읽을 수 있습니다.

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

Crippled America

Donald Trump

Yes We Still Can

Dan Pfeiffer

The America We Deserve

Donald Trump

Donald Trump Jr.

Donald Trump

Barbara McQuade

Heather Cox Richardson

No Is Not Enough

Naomi Klein

이 책에 대한 FAQ

더 알아보기

학습 계획

The Civic Persuader's Playbook

In an era of information overload, the ability to turn technical data into a moving narrative is a superpower for civic leaders. This playbook is essential for urban planners, policy advocates, and local leaders who need to mobilize public support for complex initiatives.

2 h•3 섹션

학습 계획

US Politics

This learning plan provides essential knowledge for anyone seeking to understand how American democracy actually works beyond news headlines and partisan talking points. It's ideal for engaged citizens, students, professionals working in policy or government, and anyone who wants to participate more meaningfully in civic life by understanding both the constitutional foundations and contemporary challenges facing US political institutions.

5 h 34 m•5 섹션

학습 계획

Democracy

This learning plan is essential for anyone seeking to understand why democracies worldwide face unprecedented challenges and what can be done to preserve them. It's particularly valuable for engaged citizens, aspiring policy professionals, educators, and anyone concerned about the future of democratic governance in an era of polarization and institutional strain.

5 h 24 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

Analyze Profiles in Courage & Modern Lessons

This plan is essential for aspiring leaders and public servants who want to anchor their decision-making in proven moral frameworks. It bridges the gap between historical presidential integrity and the high-stakes ethical dilemmas of the modern political landscape.

5 h 31 m•4 섹션

학습 계획

The Strategist's Guide to Clear Thinking

In an era of information overload, the ability to think structurally and argue ethically is a critical leadership asset. This guide is designed for professionals and decision-makers who need to strip away noise, validate evidence, and lead through high-level persuasion and debate.

2 h•4 섹션

학습 계획

Power, Ideas, and the State

In an era of deep polarization, understanding the intersection of economic interests and political theory is essential for informed citizenship. This plan is designed for aspiring leaders and policy enthusiasts who want to move beyond headlines to the structural roots of governance.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

The Transformation Director's Playbook

This playbook is essential for high-achievers who want to treat their fitness journey with the same strategic precision as a professional production. It is designed for individuals looking to combine physical excellence with powerful digital storytelling to inspire others.

1 h 30 m•3 섹션

학습 계획

Machiavelli for Modern Leaders

This plan is essential for leaders navigating volatile environments where traditional idealism often fails. It provides a pragmatic toolkit for executives and managers who need to master power dynamics, strategic agility, and reputation management to ensure institutional longevity.

2 h•4 섹션

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

샌프란시스코에서 컬럼비아 대학교 동문들이 만들었습니다

LOVED BY

1,000,000+ curious minds.

4.7

avg rating

1M+ learners

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

"Instead of endless scrolling, I just hit play on BeFreed. It saves me so much time."

@Moemenn

"I never knew where to start with nonfiction—BeFreed’s book lists turned into podcasts gave me a clear path."

@Chloe, Solo founder, LA

117

"Perfect balance between learning and entertainment. Finished ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’ on my commute this week."

@Raaaaaachelw

"Crazy how much I learned while walking the dog. BeFreed = small habits → big gains."

@Matt, YC alum

108

"Reading used to feel like a chore. Now it’s just part of my lifestyle."

@Erin, Investment Banking Associate , NYC

254

"Feels effortless compared to reading. I’ve finished 6 books this month already."

@djmikemoore

"BeFreed turned my guilty doomscrolling into something that feels productive and inspiring."

@Pitiful

4.5K

"BeFreed turned my commute into learning time. 20-min podcasts are perfect for finishing books I never had time for."

@SofiaP

"BeFreed replaced my podcast queue. Imagine Spotify for books — that’s it. 🙌"

@Jaded_Falcon

201

"It is great for me to learn something from the book without reading it."

@OojasSalunke

"The themed book list podcasts help me connect ideas across authors—like a guided audio journey."

@Leo, Law Student, UPenn

483

"Makes me feel smarter every time before going to work"

@Cashflowbubu

웹에서 BeFreed가 어떻게 논의되고 있는지 더 보기

지금 바로 학습 여정을 시작하세요

3장

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기

개요트럼프 없는 미국 만들기 개요

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

The Battle for America's Political Soul

Trumpism: The Marriage of Billionaires and Bigots

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Yes We Can vs. Because We Can: The Political Power Asymmetry

The Republican Playbook: Racism, Rigging, and Racketeering

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Republican Plot Against Democracy

Winning in 2020: A Strategic Blueprint

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Rebuilding Democracy: The Path Forward

Reforming American Institutions

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Toward a More Perfect Union

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기 완독을 축하합니다

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기의 핵심 주제

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기의 명언

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기의 등장인물

저자 소개

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기 요약 다운로드

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

이 책에 대한 FAQ

What is Un-Trumping America by Dan Pfeiffer about?

Who should read Un-Trumping America?

Is Un-Trumping America worth reading?

What are Dan Pfeiffer’s main arguments in Un-Trumping America?

더 알아보기

1,000,000+ curious minds.

1,000,000+ curious minds.

한 권의 책, 다양한 듣기 방식.

The Battle for America's Political Soul

Trumpism: The Marriage of Billionaires and Bigots

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Yes We Can vs. Because We Can: The Political Power Asymmetry

The Republican Playbook: Racism, Rigging, and Racketeering

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

The Republican Plot Against Democracy

Winning in 2020: A Strategic Blueprint

들리는 모든 단어를 눈으로 확인하세요

Rebuilding Democracy: The Path Forward

Reforming American Institutions

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기에서 더 많은 것을 얻으세요

Toward a More Perfect Union

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기 완독을 축하합니다

다른 사용자들도 좋아한 책

더 알아보기

트럼프 없는 미국 만들기 개요